FOOTNOTES:

[9] Minimum area method (Mohr 1947).

[10] Before dispersal.

[11] See text and figure 19.

[12] Pack of five.

[Illustration: _Figure 19.--Locations and range of wolf 1051. Lines are

NOT travel routes; rather they merely indicate sequence of locations.

Only selected lakes are shown._]

From February 26 until April 24 the movements of 1051 were strongly

indicative of dispersal (fig. 20). His average weekly straight line

move during that period was 25 miles (compared with 6 miles per week

before this period), and until March 14 he maintained an almost

straight south-southwest heading to a location west of the town of

Castle Danger. After that the animal traveled a series of

northwest-southwest alternations that on April 3 took him east of Big

Sandy Lake to a point 129 miles southwest of where he had begun the

dispersal. There he remained for about 2 weeks, but between April 17

and 24 he traveled 26 miles northwest. We last saw him at 3:30 p.m. on

April 24 heading northwest through a swamp 15 miles southeast of Grand

Rapids, approximately 122 miles from where he had started. The total of

straight line distances between 16 consecutive pairs of locations taken

at intervals of from 1 to 8 days was 226 miles, which is the minimum

distance the wolf traveled during his dispersal.

[Illustration: _Figure 20.--Dispersal of wolf 1051. Lines merely

indicate sequence of locations. Only selected lakes are shown._]

We observed 1051 for distances of up to 5 miles during these travels;

he maintained a steady trot that seemed faster than usual, and he

appeared intent on heading in a straight line. He did chase deer

during his travels, and twice was seen feeding on carcasses. In the

area where he remained for about 2 weeks, he was twice seen closely

associated with another wolf. This relationship will be discussed

later.

An extensive search was made for 1051's signals on May 2 in an area of

at least 50 miles radius from his last known location, but it was

unsuccessful. On each subsequent tracking flight, the wolf's frequency

was also monitored with no success. Possible explanations for the loss

of the signal from this wolf include the following: (1) premature

expiration of the transmitter, (2) capture of the wolf and breakage of

the transmitter, (3) loss of the exposed antenna and consequent

reduction of range, and (4) travel of the wolf out of range of the

tracking aircraft.

During 1051's travels a number of interesting events took place:

Ecological Studies of the Timber Wolf in Northeastern Minnesota · 第 15 / 69 题