CHAPTER XII

A "LEFT-HANDED" MARRIAGE

I

On arriving in London, and (thanks to the bounty of Ludwig) being well

provided with funds, Lola took a house in Half Moon Street,

Piccadilly. There she established something of a _salon_, where she

gave a series of evening receptions. They were not, perhaps, up to the

old Barerstrasse standard; still, they brought together a number of

the less important "lions," all of whom were only too pleased to

accept invitations.

Among the hangers-on was Frederick Leveson-Gower, a son of Earl

Granville. He had met the great Rachel in Paris and was ecstatic about

her. "Not long after," he says, "I got to know another much less

gifted individual, but who having captivated a King, upset two

Ministries, and brought about a revolution in Bavaria, was entitled to

be looked upon as celebrated. This was Lola Montez."

In his character of what is still oddly dubbed a "man-about-town,"

Serjeant Ballantine was also among those who attended these Half Moon

Street gatherings. "His hostess," he says, "had certain claims to

celebrity. She was, I believe, of Spanish origin, and certainly

possessed that country's style of beauty, with much dash of manner and

an extremely _outré_ fashion of dress." Another occasional visitor was

George Augustus Sala, a mid-Victorian journalist who was responsible

for printing more slipshod inaccuracies than any two members of his

craft put together. He says that he once contemplated writing Lola's

memoirs. He did not, however, get beyond "contemplating." This,

perhaps, was just as well, since he was so ill-equipped for the task

that he imagined she was a sister of Adah Isaacs Menken.

"About this time," he says, "I made the acquaintance, at a little

cigar shop under the pillars in Norreys Street, Regent Street, of an

extremely handsome lady, originally the wife of a solicitor, but who

had been known in London and Paris as a ballet-dancer under the name

of Lola Montez. When I knew her, she had just escaped from Munich,

where she had been too notorious as Countess of Landsfeld. She had

obtained for a time complete mastery over old King Ludwig of Bavaria;

and something like a revolution had been necessary to induce her to

quit the Bavarian capital."

A ridiculous story spread that Lord Brougham (who had witnessed her

ill-starred début in 1843) wanted to marry her. The fact that there

was already a Lady Brougham in existence did not curb the tongues of

the gossipers. "She refused the honourable Lord," says a French

journalist, "in a manner that redounded to her credit."

Journalists, anxious for "copy," haunted Half Moon Street all day

long. They were never off her doorstep. "Town gossip," declared one of

them, "is in full swing; and the general public are all agog to catch

a glimpse of the latest 'lioness.' Lola Montez is on every lip and in

everybody's eye. She is causing an even bigger sensation than that

inspired by the Swedish Nightingale, Madame Jenny Lind."

Notwithstanding the ill-success of a former attempt to exploit her

personality behind the footlights, Mrs. Keeley produced a sketch at

the Haymarket written "round" Lola Montez. This, slung together by

Stirling Coyne, was called: _Pas de Fascination_. The scene was laid

in "Neverask-_where_"; and among the characters were "Prince

Dunbrownski," "Count Muffenuff," and "General von Bolte."

It scarcely sounds rib-rending.

Mrs. Charles Kean, who attended the first performance, described _Pas

de Fascination_ as "the most daring play I ever witnessed." Lola

Montez herself took it in good part. She sat in a box, "and, when the

curtain fell, threw a magnificent bouquet at the principal actress."

Coals of fire.

Not to be behindhand in offering tit-bits of "news," an American

correspondent informed his readers that: "During the early part of

1849, Lola Montez, arrayed in the Royal Bavarian jewels, crashed into

one of the Court balls at Buckingham Palace. Needless to remark," he

added, "the audacity has not been repeated." From this, it would

appear that the Lord Chamberlain had been aroused from his temporary

slumbers.

The _Satirist_ had assured his readers "the public will soon be

hearing more of Madame Montez." They did. What they heard was

something quite unexpected. This was that she had made a second

experiment in matrimony, and that her choice had fallen on a Mr.

George Heald, a callow lad of twenty, for whom a commission as Cornet

in the Life Guards had been purchased by his family.

II

The precise reasons actuating Lola in adopting this step were not

divulged. Several, however, suggested themselves. Perhaps she was

attracted by the Cornet's glittering cuirass and plumed helmet;

perhaps by his substantial income; and perhaps she tired of being a

homeless wanderer, and felt that here at last was a prospect of

settling down and experimenting with domesticity.

When the announcement appeared in print there was much fluttering

among the Mayfair dovecotes. As the bridegroom had an income of

approximately £10,000 a year, the débutantes--chagrined to discover

that such an "eligible" had been snatched from their grasp--felt

inclined to call an indignation meeting.

"Preposterous," they said, "that such a woman should have snapped him

up! Something ought to be done about it."

But, for the moment, nothing was "done about it," and the knot was

tied on July 14. Lola saw that the knot should be a double one; and

the ceremony took place, first, at the French Catholic Chapel in King

Street, and afterwards at St. George's, Hanover Square.

[Illustration: _Berrymead Priory, Acton, where Lola Montez lived with

Cornet Heald_]

A press representative, happening to be among the congregation, rushed

off to Grub Street. There he was rewarded with a welcome five

shillings by his editor, who, in high glee at securing such a piece of

news before any other journal, had a characteristic paragraph on the

subject:

Lola Montez, Countess of Landsfeld, the ex-danseuse and

ex-favourite of the imbecile old King of Bavaria, is, we are

able to inform our readers, at last married legitimately.

_On dit_ that her young husband, Mr. George Trafford Heald,

has been dragged into the match somewhat hurriedly. It will

be curious to mark the progress of the Countess in this

novel position. A sudden change from a career of furious

excitement to one in which prudence and a regard for the

rules of good society are the very opposite to those

observed by loose foreigners must prove a trial to her.

Whipping commissaries of police, and setting ferocious dogs

at inoffensive civilians, may do very well for Munich. In

England, however, we are scarcely prepared for these

activities, even if they be deemed the privilege of a

countess.

Disraeli, who had a hearty appetite for all the tit-bits of gossip

discussed in Mayfair drawing-rooms, heard of the match and mentioned

it in a letter to his sister, Sarah:

_July, 1849._

The Lola Montez marriage makes a sensation. I believe he

[Heald] has only £3,000 per annum, not £13,000. It was an

affair of a few days. She sent to ask the refusal of his

dog, which she understood was for sale--of course it wasn't,

being very beautiful. But he sent it as a present. She

rejoined; he called; and they were married in a week. He is

only twenty-one, and wished to be distinguished. Their

dinner invitations are already out, I am told. She quite

convinced him previously that she was not Mrs. James; and,

as for the King of Bavaria, who, by the by, allows her £1500

a year, and to whom she writes every day--that was only a

_malheureuse_ passion.

Apropos of this union, a popular riddle went the round of the clubs:

"Why does a certain young officer of the Life Guards resemble a much

mended pair of shoes?" The answer was, "Because he has been heeled

[Heald] and soled [sold]."

The honeymoon was spent at Berrymead Priory, a house that the

bridegroom owned at Acton. This was a substantial Gothic building,

with several acres of well timbered ground and gardens. Some distance,

perhaps, from the Cornet's barracks. Still, one imagines he did not

take his military duties very seriously; and leave of absence "on

urgent private affairs" was, no doubt, granted in liberal fashion.

Also, he possessed a phæton, in which, with a spanking chestnut

between the shafts, the miles would soon be covered.

The Priory had a history stretching back to the far off days of Henry

III, when it belonged to the Chapter of St. Paul's Cathedral. Henry

VII, in high-handed fashion, presented it to the Earl of Bedford; and

a subsequent occupant was the notorious Elizabeth Chudleigh, the

bigamous spouse of the Duke of Kingston. Another light lady, Nancy

Dawson, is also said to have lived there as its châtelaine, under the

"protection" of the Duke of Newcastle.

At the beginning of the last century the property was acquired by a

Colonel Clutton. He was followed by Edward Bulwer, afterwards Lord

Lytton, who lived there on and off (chiefly off) with his wife, until

their separation in 1836. On one occasion he gave a dinner-party,

among the guests being John Forster, "to meet Miss Landon,

Fontblanque, and Hayward." To the invitation was added the warning,

"We dine at half-past five, to allow time for return, and regret much

having no spare beds as yet." A spare bed, however, was available for

Lord Beaconsfield, when he dined there in the following year.

On the departure of Bulwer, the house had a succession of tenants; and

for a short period it even sheltered a bevy of Nuns of the Sacred

Heart. It was when they left that the estate was purchased by Mr.

George Heald, a barrister with a flourishing practice. He left it to

his booby son, the Cornet: and it was thus that Lola Montez

established her connection with Berrymead Priory.

While the original house still stands, the garden in which it stood

has gone; and the building itself now serves as the premises of the

Acton Constitutional Club. But the committee have been careful to

preserve some evidence of Cornet Heald's occupancy. Thus, his crest

and family motto, _Nemo sibi Nascitur_, are let into the mosaic

flooring of the hall, and the drawing-room ceiling is embellished with

his initials picked out in gold.

III

Prejudice, perhaps, but unions between the sons of Mars and the

daughters of Terpsichore were in those days frowned upon by the

military big-wigs at the Horse Guards. Hence, it was not long before

an inspired note on the subject of this one appeared in the

_Standard_:

We learn from undoubted authority that, immediately on the

marriage of Lieutenant Heald with the Countess of Landsfeld,

the Marquess of Londonderry, Colonel of the 2nd Life Guards,

took the most decisive steps to recommend to Her Majesty

that this officer's resignation of his commission should be

insisted on; and that he should at once leave the regiment,

which this unfortunate and extraordinary act might possibly

prejudice.

Her Majesty, having consulted the Prince Consort and the Duke of

Wellington, shared this view. Instead, however, of being summarily

"gazetted out," the love-sick young warrior was permitted to "send in

his papers."

Thinking that he had acted precipitately in resigning, Cornet Heald

(egged on, doubtless, by Lola) endeavoured to get his resignation

cancelled. The authorities, however, were adamant. "Much curiosity,"

says a journalistic comment, "has been aroused among the Household

Troops by the efforts of this officer to regain his commission after

having voluntarily relinquished it. Notwithstanding his youth and the

fact that he had given way to a sudden impulse, Lord Londonderry was

positively inflexible. Yet the influence and eloquence of a certain

ex-Chancellor, well known to the bride, was brought to bear on him."

The "certain ex-Chancellor" was none other than Lord Brougham.

Much criticism followed in other circles. Everybody had an opinion to

advance. Most of them were far from complimentary, and there were

allusions by the dozen to "licentious soldiery" and "gilded

popinjays." The rigid editor of _The Black Book of the British

Aristocracy_ was particularly indignant. "The Army," he declared, in a

fierce outburst, "is the especial favourite of the aristocratic

section. Any brainless young puppy with a commission is free to lounge

away his time in dandyism and embryo moustaches at the public

expense."

The _Satirist_, living up to its name, also had its customary sting:

Of course, the gallant Colonel of the Household Troops could

not do less. That distinguished corps is immaculate; and no

breath of wind must come between it and its propriety. There

is but one black sheep in the 2nd Life Guards, and that, in

the eyes of the coal black colonel (him of the collieries),

is the soft, enchanted, and enchained Mr. Heald. Poor Heald!

Indignant Londonderry! How subservient, in truth, must be

the lean subaltern to his fat colonel.

A Sunday organ followed suit. "What," it demanded, "may be the precise

article of the military code against which Mr. Heald is thought to

have offended? One could scarcely have supposed that officers in Her

Majesty's service were living under such a despotism that they should

be compelled to solicit permission to get married, or their colonel's

approbation of their choice."

In addition to thus disapproving of marriages between his officers and

ladies of the stage, Lord Londonderry (a veteran of fifty-five years'

service) disapproved with equal vigour of tobacco. "What," he once

wrote to Lord Combermere, "are the Gold Sticks to do with that sink of

smoking, the Horse Guards' guard and mess-rooms? Whenever I have

visited them, I have found them _worse_ than any pot-house, and this

actually opposite the Adjutant-General's and under his Grace's very

nose!"

The example set by Cornet Heald seems to have been catching. "Another

young officer of this regiment," announced the _Globe_, "has just run

off with a frail lady belonging to the Theatre and actually married

her at Brighton." He, too, was required to "send in his papers."

Besides losing his commission, Cornet Heald had, in his marriage, all

unwittingly laid up a peck of fresh trouble for himself. This was

brought to a head by the action of his spinster aunt, Miss Susannah

Heald, who, until he came of age, had been his guardian. Suspecting

Lola of a "past," she set herself to pry into it. Gathering that her

nephew's inamorata had already been married, she employed enquiry

agents to look into this previous union and discover just how and when

it had been dissolved. They did their work well, and reported that the

divorce decree of seven years earlier had not been made absolute, and

that Lola's first husband, Captain James, was still alive. Armed with

this knowledge, Miss Heald hurried off to the authorities, and, having

"laid an information," had Lola Montez arrested for bigamy.

The case was heard at Marlborough Street police court, with Mr.

Bingham sitting as Magistrate. Mr. Clarkson conducted the prosecution,

and Mr. Bodkin appeared for the defence.

"The proceedings of a London police court," declared _John Bull_,

"have seldom presented a case more fruitful of matter for public

gossip than was exhibited in the investigation at Marlborough Street,

where the mediated wife of a British officer (and one invested with

the distinction of Royal favouritism) answered a charge of imputed

bigamy.... It will readily be inferred that we allude to that

extraordinary personage known as Lola Montez, _alias_ the Countess of

Landsfeld."

Lola had, as the theatrical world would put it, dressed for the part.

She had probably rehearsed it, too. She wore, we learn, "a black silk

costume, under a velvet jacket, and a plain white straw bonnet trimmed

with blue ribbons." As became a countess, she was not required to sit

in the dock, but was given a chair in front of it. "There," said a

reporter, "she appeared quite unembarrassed, and smiled frequently as

she made a remark to her husband. She was described on the charge

sheet as being twenty-four years of age, but in our opinion she has

the look of a woman of at least thirty."

"In figure," added a second occupant of the press box, "madam is

rather plump, and of middle height, with pale complexion, unusually

large blue eyes and long black lashes. Her reputed husband, Mr. Heald,

is a tall young man of boyish aspect, fair hair and small brown

moustachios and whiskers. During the whole of the proceedings he sat

with the Countess's hand clasped in his, occasionally giving it a

fervent squeeze, and murmuring fondly in her ear."

All being ready, Mr. Clarkson opened the case for the prosecution.

"The offence imputed to the lady at the bar," he said, "is

that, well knowing her husband, Captain Thomas James, was

still alive, she contracted another marriage with this young

gentleman, Mr. George Trafford Heald. If this be

established, serious consequences must follow, as I shall

prove that the Ecclesiastical Court merely granted a decree

_a mensa et thoro_." He then put in a copy of this document,

and pointed out that, by its provisions, neither party was

free to re-marry during the lifetime of the other. Counsel

also submitted an extract from the register of the Hanover

Square church, showing that, on July 19, the defendant had,

under the name of "Maria Torres de Landsfeld," gone through

a ceremony of marriage with Cornet Heald.

Police-sergeant Gray, who had executed the warrant, described the

arrest.

"When I told her she must come along with me, the lady up and said:

'This is all rubbish. I was properly divorced from Captain James by

Act of Parliament. Lord Brougham was present when the divorce was

granted. I don't know if Captain James is still alive or not, and I

don't care a little bit. I was married to him in the wrong name, and

that made the whole thing illegal.'"

"Did she say anything else?" enquired the magistrate.

"Yes, Your Worship," returned the sergeant, consulting his note-book.

"She said: 'What on earth will the Royal Family say when they hear of

this? There's bound to be the devil of a fuss.'"

"Laughter in Court!" chronicled the pressmen.

"And what did you say to that?" enquired Mr. Bingham.

"I said that anything she said would be taken down by myself and used

in evidence against her," was the glib response.

The execution of the warrant would appear to have been carried out in

dramatic fashion.

Having evidently got wind of what was awaiting her, Lola and the

Cornet had packed their luggage and arranged to leave England. Just as

they were stepping into their carriage, Miss Susannah Heald and her

solicitor, accompanied by a couple of police officers, drove up in a

cab to Half Moon Street. When the latter announced that they had a

warrant for her arrest, there was something of a scene. "The

Countess," declared an imaginative reporter (who must have been

hovering on the doorstep), "exhibited all the appearance of excessive

passion. She used very strong language, pushed the elderly Miss Heald

aside, and bustled her husband in vigorous fashion. However, she soon

cooled down, and, on being escorted to Vine Street police station,

where the charge of bigamy was booked, she graciously apologised for

any trouble she had given the representatives of the law. She then

begged permission to light a cigar, and suggested that the constables

on duty there should join her in a social whiff."

Miss Susannah Heald, described as "an aged lady," deposed that she was

Cornet Heald's aunt, and that she had been appointed his guardian

during his minority, which had only just expired. She was bringing the

action, she insisted, "from a sense of duty."

Another witness was Captain Charles Ingram, a mariner in the service

of the East India Company. He identified the accused as the Mrs. James

who had sailed in a ship under his command from Calcutta to London in

the year 1842.

While an official return, prepared by the military authorities, showed

Captain James to have been alive on June 13, there was none to show

that he was still in the land of the living on July 19, the date of

the alleged bigamous marriage. The prosecution affected to consider

this point unimportant. The magistrate, however (on whom Lola's bright

eyes had done their work), did not agree.

"The point," he said, "is, to my mind, very important. During the

interval that elapsed between these two dates many things may have

happened which would render this second marriage quite legal. It is

possible, for instance, that Captain James may have been snatched from

this world to another one by any of those numerous casualties--such as

wounds in action or cholera--that are apt to befall members of the

military profession serving in a tropical climate. What do you say to

that, Mr. Clarkson?"

Mr. Clarkson had nothing to say. Mr. Bodkin, however, when it came to

his turn, had a good deal to say. The charge against his client was,

he declared, "in all his professional experience, absolutely

unparalleled." Neither the first nor the second husband, he pointed

out, had advanced any complaint; and the offence, if any, had been

committed under circumstances that fully justified it. He did not wish

to hint at improper motives on the part of Miss Heald, but it was

clear, he protested, that her attitude was governed by private, and

not by public, ends. None the less, he concluded, "I am willing to

admit that enough has been put before the Court to justify further

enquiry."

Such an admission was a slip which even the very rawest of counsel

should have avoided. It forced the hand of the magistrate.

"I am asked," he said, "to act on a presumption of guilt. As proof of

guilt is wanting, I am reluctant to act on such presumption, even to

the extent of granting a remand, unless the prosecution can assure me

that more evidence will be offered at another hearing. Since, however,

the defendant's own advocate has voluntarily admitted that there is

ground for further enquiry, I am compelled to order a remand. But the

accused will be released from custody on providing two sureties of

£500 each, and herself in one of £1000."

The adjourned proceedings began a week later, and were heard by

another magistrate, Mr. Hardwick. This time, however, there was no

defendant, for, on her name being called by the usher, Mr. Bodkin

pulled a long face and announced that his client had left England. "I

cannot," he said, "offer any reason for her absence." Still, he had a

suggestion. "It is possible," he said, "that she has gone abroad for

the benefit of her health." The question of estreating the

recognizances then arose. While not prepared to abandon them

altogether, counsel for the prosecution was sufficiently generous to

say that so far as he was concerned no objection would be offered to

extending them.

When, after two more adjournments, the defendant still failed to

surrender to her bail, the magistrate and counsel for the prosecution

altered their tone.

"Your Worship," said Mr. Clarkson, "it has come to my knowledge that

the person whose real name is Mrs. James, and who is charged with the

felonious crime of bigamy, is now some hundreds of miles beyond your

jurisdiction, and does not mean to appear. Accordingly, on behalf of

the highly respectable Miss Heald, I now ask that the recognizances be

forfeited. My client has been actuated all through by none but the

purest motives, her one object being to remove the only son of a

beloved brother from a marriage that was as illegal as it was

disgraceful. If we secure evidence from India that Captain James is

still alive, we shall then adopt the necessary steps to remove this

deluded lad from the fangs of this scheming woman."

"Let the recognizances be estreated," was the magisterial comment.

"Sensation!" scribbled the reporters.

Serjeant Ballantine, who liked to have a hand in all _causes

célèbres_, declares that he was consulted by Lola's solicitors, with a

view to undertaking her defence. If so, he would seem to have read his

instructions very casually, since he adds: "I forget whether the

prosecution was ultimately dropped, or whether she left England before

any result was arrived at. My impression is that the charge could not

have been substantiated."

Ignoring the fact that the case was still _sub judice_, the _Observer_

offered its readers some severe comments:

"The Helen of the age is most assuredly Lola Montez, _alias_

Betsy James, _alias_ the Gräfin von Lansfelt, _alias_ Mrs.

Heald. As far as can be gathered from her dark history, her

first public act was alleged adultery, as her last is

alleged bigamy.... The evidence produced before the

Consistory Court is of the most clear and convincing nature,

and proves that the character of this lady (whose fame has

become so disgustingly notorious) has been from an early

date that of a mere wanton, alike unmindful of the sacred

ties of matrimony and utterly careless of the opinion of the

world upon morality or religion."

[Illustration: _Lola Montez in London. Aged thirty_

(_Engraved by Auguste Hüssner_)]

By the way, during the police court proceedings, fresh light on the

subject of Lola's parentage was furnished by an odd entry in an Irish

paper:

"Lola Montez, Countess of Landsfeld, is the daughter of a

Cork lady. Her mother was at one time employed as a member

of a millinery establishment in this city; and was married

here to Lieutenant Gilbert, an officer in the army. Soon

after the marriage, he sailed with his wife and child to

join his regiment in India. At the end of last year, Lola's

mother, who is now in delicate health, visited her sister in

Cork."

IV

Thanks to the bright eyes of Lola (or perhaps to the musical jingle of

the Cornet's cash bags), a very loose watch was kept on the pair.

Hence the reason why the Countess of Landsfeld (as she still insisted

on being called) had not kept her second appointment at Marlborough

Street was because, together with the dashing ex-Life Guardsman, she

had left England early that morning. Travelling as Mr. and Mrs. Heald,

the pair went, first, to Paris, and then to Italy.

A British tourist who happened to be in Naples wrote to _The Times_,

giving an account of a glimpse he had of them. According to him, the

couple, "a youthful bridegroom and a fair lady," accompanied by a

courier, a _femme de chambre_, and a carriage, took rooms at the Hotel

Vittoria. After one night there, they left the next morning, hiring a

special steamer, at a cost of £400, to take them to Marseilles. The

hurried departure was said to be due to a lawyer's letters that was

waiting for the bridegroom at his banker's. "I am told," adds the

correspondent, "that Mr. and Mrs. Heald were bound on an excursion to

the Pyramids; and that, when the little business for which the lady is

wanted at home has been settled, they mean to prosecute their

intention. Pray, sir, help Mrs. Heald out of her present affliction.

Is this the first time that a lady has had two husbands? And is she

not bound for the East, where every man has four wives?"

The booby Cornet, with his ideas limited to fox-hunting and a study of

_Ruff's Guide_, was no mate for a brilliant woman like Lola. Hence

disagreements soon manifested themselves. A specially serious one

would seem to have arisen at Barcelona, for, says a letter from a

mutual acquaintance, "the Countess and her husband had a warm

discussion, which ended in an attempt by her to stab him. Mr. Heald,

objecting to such a display of conjugal affection, promptly quitted

the town."

Further particulars were supplied by another correspondent: "I saw Mr.

Heald," says this authority. "He is a tall, thin young man, with a

fair complexion, and often uses rouge to hide his pallor. Many pity

him for what has happened. Others, however, pity the lovely Lola.

Before he left this district, Mr. Heald called on the English Consul.

'I have come,' he said,'to ask your advice. Some of my friends here

suggest that I should leave my wife. What ought I to do about it? If I

stop with her, I am afraid of being assassinated or poisoned.' He then

exhibited a garment covered with blood. The Consul replied: 'I am

positively astonished that, after the attack of which you speak, you

did not complain to the police, and that you have since lived with

your wife on terms of intimacy. If you want to abandon her, you must

do as you think best. I cannot advise you.'"

H.B.M. Consul, however, did stretch a point, since he (perhaps fearing

further bloodshed) offered to _viser_ the applicant's passport for any

other country. Thereupon, Mr. Heald betook himself to Mataro. But,

becoming conscience-smitten, he promptly sat down and wrote an

apologetic letter to the lady he left behind him, begging her

forgiveness. "If you should ever have reason to complain of me again,"

he said, "this letter will always act as a talisman."

Apparently it had the effect, for Lola returned to her penitent

spouse.

The Barcelona correspondent of _L'Assemblée Nationale_ managed to

interview the Cornet.

"He says," announced this authority, "that others persuaded him to

depart, against his real wishes. On rejoining him, Mrs. Heald was most

indignant. Her eyes positively flashed fire; and, if she should chance

to encounter the men who took her husband from her, I quite tremble to

think what will happen!"

Something obviously did happen, for, according to de Mirecourt,

"during their sojourn in Sunny Spain, the admirable English husband

made his wife the gratified mother of two beautiful offspring."

Parenthood, however, would appear to have had an odd effect upon this

couple, for, continues de Mirecourt: "_Mais, en dépit de ces gages

d'amour, leur bonheur est troublé par des querelles intestines._"

It was from Spain that, having adjusted their differences temporarily,

the couple went back to Paris. As a peace offering, a rising young

artist, Claudius Jacquand, was commissioned to paint both their

portraits on a single canvas. During, however, another domestic

rupture, Heald demanded that Lola's features should be painted out. "I

want nothing," he said, "to remind me of that woman." Unfortunately,

Lola had just made a similar demand where the Cornet was concerned.

Jacquand was a man of talent, but he could not do impossibilities.

Thereupon, Lola, breathing fire and fury, took the canvas away and

hung it with its back to the front in her bedroom. "To allow my

husband to watch me always would," she said, "be indelicate!"

There is a theory that, within the next twelve months, the

ill-assorted union was dissolved by Heald getting upset in a

rowing-boat and drowned in Lisbon harbour. The theory, however, is a

little difficult to reconcile with the fact that, on the close of the

Great Exhibition at the end of 1851, he attended an auction of the

effects, where he bought a parquet floor and had it laid down in his

drawing-room at Berrymead Priory. After this he had a number of

structural alterations added; fitted the windows with some stained

glass, bearing his crest and initials; and, finally, did not give up

the lease until 1855. Pretty good work, this, for a man said to have

met with a watery grave six years earlier.

As a matter of strict fact, Cornet Heald was not drowned, either at

Lisbon or anywhere else. He died in his bed at Folkestone, in 1856.

The medical certificate attributed the cause of death to consumption.

In the _Gentleman's Magazine_, however, the diagnosis was different,

viz., "broken heart."

All things pass. In 1859 the executors of the dashing Cornet sold the

Berrymead property for £7000, to be repurchased soon afterwards for

£23,000 by a land-development company. The house now serves as the

premises of the Priory Constitutional Club, Acton. A certain amount of

evidence of Cornet Heald's one-time occupancy still exists. Thus his

crest and motto, _Nemo sibi Nascitur_, are let into the mosaic

flooring of the hall, and the drawing-room ceiling is embellished with

his initials picked out in gold.

The Magnificent Montez: From Courtesan to Convert · 第 12 / 17 章