Act III., in which we find that, fortune having shuffled the cards, and

the judge and jury cut them, Mr. Titmouse turns up possessor of Yatton

and ten thousand a-year; while Aubrey, quite at the bottom of the pack,

is in a state of destitution. To show the depth of distress into which

he has fallen, a happy expedient is hit upon: he is described as turning

his attention and attainments to literature; and that the unfathomable

straits he is put to may be fully understood, he is made a reviewer!

Thus the highest degree of sympathy is excited towards him; for

everybody knows that no person would willingly resort to criticism

(literary or dramatic) as a means of livelihood, if he could command a

broom and a crossing to earn a penny by, or while there exists a

Mendicity Society to get soup from.

We have yet to mention one character; and considering that he is the

main-spring of the whole matter, we cannot put it off any longer. Mr.

Gammon is a lawyer—that is quite enough; we need not say more. You all

know that stage solicitors are more outrageous villains than even their

originals. Mr. Gammon is, of course, a “fine speciment of the specious,”

as Mr. Hood’s Mr. Higgings says. It is he who, finding out a flaw in

Aubrey’s title, angled per advertisement for the heir, and caught a

Tittlebat—Titmouse. It is he who has so disinterestedly made that

gentleman’s fortune.—“Only just merely for the sake of the costs?” one

naturally asks. Oh no; there is a stronger reason (with which, however,

reason has nothing to do)—love! Mr. Gammon became desperately enamoured

of Miss Aubrey; but she was silly enough to prefer the heir to a

peerage, Mr. Delamere. Mr. Gammon never forgave her, and so ruins her

brother.

Having brought the whole family to a state in which he supposes they

will refuse nothing, Gammon visits Miss Aubrey, and, in the most

handsome manner, offers her—notwithstanding the disparity in their

circumstances—his hand, heart, and fortune. More than that, he promises

to restore the estate of Yatton to its late possessor. To his

astonishment the lady rejects him; and, he showing what the bills call

the “cloven foot,” Miss Aubrey orders him to be shown out. Meantime, Mr.

Tittlebat Titmouse, having been returned M.P. for Yatton, has made a

great noise in house, not by his oratorical powers, but by his

proficient imitations of cock-crowing and donkey-braying.

This being Act IV., it is quite clear that Gammon’s villany and

Tittlebat’s prosperity cannot last much longer. Both are ended in an

original manner. True to the principle with which the Adelphi commenced

its season—that of putting stage villany into comedy—Mr. Gammon

concludes the facetiæ with which his part abounds by a comic suicide!

All the details of this revolting operation are gone through amidst the

most ponderous levity; insomuch, that the audience had virtue enough to

hiss most lustily33. While this page was passing through the press, we

witnessed a representation of “Ten Thousand a-Year” a second time, and

observed that the offensiveness of this scene was considerably abated.

Mr. Lyon deserves a word of praise for his acting in that passage of the

piece as it now stands. .

Thus the string of rascality by which the piece is held together being

cut, it naturally finishes by the reinstatement of Aubrey—together with

a view of Yatton in sunshine, a procession of charity children, mutual

embraces by all the characters, and a song by Mrs. Grattan. What becomes

of Titmouse is not known, and did not seem to be much cared about.

This piece is interesting, not because it is cleverly constructed (for

it is not), nor because Mr. Titmouse dyes his hair green with a barber’s

nostrum, nor on account of the cupboard court of Nisi Prius, nor of the

charity children, nor because Mr. Wieland, instead of playing the devil

himself, played Mr. Snap, one of his limbs—but because many of the

scenes are well-drawn pictures of life. The children’s ball in the first

“epoch,” for instance, was altogether excellently managed and true; and

though many of the characters are overcharged, yet we have seen people

like them in Chancery-lane, at Messrs. Swan and Edgar’s, in country

houses, and elsewhere. The suicide incident is, however, a disgusting

drawback.

The acting was also good, but too extravagantly so. Mr. Wright, as

Titmouse, thought perhaps that a Cockney dandy could not be caricatured,

and he consequently went desperate lengths, but threw in here and there

a touch of nature. Mr. Lyon was as energetic as ever in Gammon; Mrs.

Yates as lugubrious as is her wont in Miss Aubrey; Mrs. Grattan acted

and looked as if she were quite deserving of a man with ten thousand a

year. As to her singing, if her husband were in possession of twenty

thousand per annum, (would to the gods he were!) it could not have been

more charmingly tasteful. The pathetics of Wilkinson (as Quirk) in the

suicide scene, and just before the event, deserve the attention and

imitation of Macready. We hope the former comedian’s next character will

be Ion, or, at least, Othello. He has now proved that smaller parts are

beneath his purely histrionic talents.

Mr. Yates did not make a speech! This extraordinary omission set the

house in a buzz of conjectural wonderment till “The Maid of Honour” put

a stop to it.

NOTE.—A critique on this piece would have appeared last week, if it had

pleased some of the people at the post-office (through which the MS. was

sent to the Editors) not to steal it. Perhaps they took it for something

valuable; and, perhaps, they were not mistaken. Thanks be to Mercury, we

have plenty of wit to spare, and can afford some of it to be stolen now

and then. Still we entreat Colonel Maberly (Editor of the “Post” in St.

Martin’s-le-Grand) to supply his clerks with jokes enough to keep them

alive, that they may not be driven to steal other people’s. The most

effectual way to preserve them in a state of jocular honesty would be

for him to present every person on the establishment with a copy of

“Punch” from week to week.

PUNCH, OR THE LONDON CHARIVARI. VOL. 1. DECEMBER 4, 1841. [pg 241]

OFFICIAL REPORT OF THE FIRE AT THE TOWER. The document with this title,

that has got into the newspapers, has been dressed up for the public

eye. We have obtained the original draft, and beg to administer it to

our readers neat, in the precise language it was written in.

THE OFFICIAL REPORT. MR. SNOOKS says, that it being his turn to be on

watch on the night of Saturday, October 30th, he went to his duty as

usual, and having turned into his box, slept until he was amazed by

shouts and the rolling of wheels in all directions. The upper door of

his box being open, he looked out of it, and his head struck violently

against something hard, upon which he attempted to open the lower door

of his box, when he found he could not. Thinking there was something

wrong, he became very active in raising an alarm, but could obtain no

attention; and he has since found that in the hurry of moving property

from different parts of the building, his box had been closely

barricaded; and he, consequently, was compelled to remain in it until

the following morning. He says, however, that everything was quite safe

in the middle of the day when he took his great-coat to his box, and

trimmed his lantern ready for the evening.

MRS. SNOOKS, wife of the above witness, corroborates the account of her

husband, so far as trimming the lanthern in the daytime is concerned,

and also as to his being encased in his box until the morning. She had

no anxiety about him, because she had been distinctly told that the fire

did not break out until past ten, and her husband she knew was sure to

be snug in his box by that time.

JOHN JONES, a publican, says, at about nine o’clock on Saturday, the

30th of October, he saw a light in the Tower, which flickered very much

like a candle, as if somebody was continually blowing one out and

blowing it in again. He observed this for about half an hour, when it

began to look as if several gas-lights were in the room and some one was

turning the gas on and off very rapidly. After this he went to bed, and

was disturbed shortly before midnight by hearing that the Tower was in

flames.

SERGEANT FIPS, of the Scotch Fusileer (Qy. Few sillier) Guards, was at a

public-house on Tower-hill, when, happening to go to the door, he

observed a large quantity of thick smoke issuing from one of the windows

of the Tower. Knowing that Major Elrington, the deputy governor, was

fond of a cigar, he thought nothing of the circumstance of the smoke,

and was surprised in about half an hour to see flames issuing from the

building.

GEORGE SNIVEL saw the fire bursting from the Tower on Saturday night,

and being greatly frightened he ran home to his mother as soon as

possible. His mother called him a fool, and said it was the gas-works.

THOMAS POPKINS rents a back attic at Rotherhithe; he had been peeling an

onion on the 30th of October, and went to the window for the purpose of

throwing out the external coat of the vegetable mentioned in the

beginning of his testimony, when he saw a large fire burning somewhere,

with some violence. Not thinking it could be the Tower, he went to bed

after eating the onion—which has been already twice alluded to in the

course of his evidence.

MR. SWIFT, of the Jewel-office, says, that he saw the Tower burning at

the distance of about three acres from where the jewels are kept, when

his first thought was to save the regalia. For this purpose he rushed to

the scene of the conflagration and desired everybody who would obey him,

to leave what they were about and follow him to that part of the Tower

set apart for the jewels. Several firemen were induced to quit the

pumps, and having prevailed on a large body of soldiers, he led them and

a vast miscellaneous mob to the apartments where the crown, &c., were

deposited. After a considerable quantity of squeezing, screaming,

cursing, and swearing, it was discovered that the key was missing, when

the jewel-room was carried by storm, and the jewels safely lodged in

some other part of the building. When witness returned to the fire, it

was quite out, and the armoury totally demolished.

The whole of the official report is in the same satisfactory strain, but

we do not feel ourselves justified in printing any more of it.

A CON-CERTED CON. “When is the helm of a ship like a certain English

composer?”—said the double bass to the trombone in the orchestra of

Covent Garden Theatre, while resting themselves the other evening

between the acts of Norma.—The trombone wished he might be blowed if he

could tell.—“When it is A-lee” quoth the bass—rosining his bow with

extraordinary delight at his own conceit.

RECONCILING A DIFFERENCE. Two literary partisans were lately contending

with considerable warmth, for the superiority of Tait’s or Blackwood’s

Magazine—till from words they fell to blows, and decided the dispute by

the argumentum ad hominem.—Doctor Maginn, hearing of the circumstance,

observed to a friend, that however the pugnacious gentleman’s opinions

might differ with respect to Tait and Blackwood, it was evident they

were content to decide them by a Frazer (fray sir).

OUR WEATHERCOCK. The state of the weather, at all times an object of

intense interest and general conversation amongst Englishmen, has

latterly engaged much of our attention; and the observations which we

have made on the extraordinary changes which have taken place in the

weathercock during the last week warrant us in saying “there must be

something in the wind.” It has been remarked that Mr. Macready’s Hamlet

and Mr. Dubourg’s chimneys have not drawn well of late. A smart breeze

sprung up between Mr. and Mrs. Smith, of Brixton, on last Monday

afternoon, which increased during the night, and ended in a perfect

storm. Sir Peter Laurie on the same evening retired to bed rather misty,

and was exceedingly foggy all the following morning. At the Lord Mayor’s

dinner the glass was observed to rise and fall several times in a most

remarkable manner, and at last settled at “heavy wet.” A flock of gulls

were seen hovering near Crockford’s on Tuesday, and on that morning the

milkman who goes the Russell-square walk was observed to blow the tips

of his fingers at the areas of numerous houses. Applications for food

were made by some starving paupers to the Relieving Officers of

different workhouses, but the hearts of those worthy individuals were

found to be completely frozen. Notwithstanding the severity of the

weather, the nose of the beadle of St. Clement Danes has been seen for

nearly the last fortnight in full blossom. A heavy fall of blankets took

place on Wednesday, and the fleecy covering still lies on several beds

in and near the metropolis. Expecting frost to set in, Sir Robert Peel

has been busily employed on his sliding scale; in fact, affairs are

becoming very slippery in the Cabinet, and Sir James Graham is already

preparing to trim his sail to the next change of wind. Watercresses, we

understand, are likely to be scarce; there is a brisk demand for “bosom

friends” amongst unmarried ladies; and it is feared that the intense

cold which prevails at nights will drive some unprovided young men into

the union.

THE BANE AND ANTIDOTE. We are requested to state that the insane person

who lately attempted to obtain an entrance into Buckingham Palace was

not the Finsbury renegade, Mr. Wakley. We are somewhat surprised that

the rumour should have obtained circulation, as the unfortunate man is

described as being of respectable appearance.

THE CORSAIR. A POEM TO BE READ ON RAILROADS. The sky was dark—the sea

was rough;

The Corsair’s heart was brave and tough;

The wind was high—the waves were steep;

The moon was veil’d—the ocean deep;

The foam against the vessel dash’d:

The Corsair overboard was wash’d.

A rope in vain was thrown to save—

The brine is now the Corsair’s grave!

As it is expected that the jogging and jerking, or the sudden passing

through tunnels, may in some degree interfere with the perusal of this

poem, we give it with the abbreviations, as it is likely to be read with

the drawbacks alluded to.

Wherever there is a dash—it is supposed there will be a jolt of the

vehicle.

CORSAIR-POEM. —sky—dark—sea—rough;

—Corsair—brave—tough;

—wind—high—waves steep;

—moon—veil’d—oce—deep;

—foam—gainst—vess—dash’d;

—Corsair—board—wash’d.

—rope—vain—to save,

—brine—Cors—grave.

“STUPID AS A ‘POST.’” The Morning Post has made another blunder. Lord

Abinger, it seems, is too Conservative to resign. After all the

editorial boasting about “exclusive information,” “official

intelligence,” &c. it is very evident that the “Morning Twaddler” must

not be looked upon as a direction post.

We learn that a drama of startling interest, founded upon a recent event

of singular horror, is in active preparation at the Victoria Theatre. It

is to be entitled “Cavanagh the Culprit; or, the Irish Saveloyard.” The

interest of the drama will be immensely strengthened by the introduction

of the genuine knife with which the fatal ham was cut. Real saveloys

will also be eaten by the Fasting Phenomenon before the audience.

“Never saw such stirring times,” as the spoon said to the saucepan.

[pg 242] THE “PUFF PAPERS.” A very large man is surprised by a very

small man in a box. CHAPTER I. Having expressed the great gratification

I should enjoy at being permitted to become a member of so agreeable a

society, I was formally presented by the chairman with a capacious

meerschaum, richly mounted in silver, and dark with honoured age, filled

with choice tobacco, which he informed me was the initiatory pipe to be

smoked by every neophyte on his admission amongst the “Puffs.” I shall

not attempt to describe with what profound respect I received that

venerable tube into my hands—how gently I applied the blazing match to

its fragrant contents—how affectionately I placed the amber mouth-piece

between my lips, and propelled the thick wreaths of smoke in circling

eddies to the ceiling:—to dilate upon all this might savour of an

egotistical desire to exalt my own merits—a species of puffing I

mortally abhor. Suffice it to say, that when I had smoked the pipe of

peace, I was heartily congratulated by the chairman and the company

generally upon the manner in which I had acquitted myself, and I was

declared without a dissentient voice a duly-elected member of the

“Puffs.”

The business of the night, which my entrance had interrupted, was now

resumed; and the chairman, whom I shall call Arden, striking his hammer

upon a small mahogany box which was placed before him on the table,

requested silence. Before I permit him to speak, I must give my readers

a pen-and-ink sketch of his person. He was rather tall and erect in his

person—his head was finely formed—and he had a quick grey eye, which

would have given an unpleasant sharpness to his features, had it not

been softened by the benevolent smile which played around his mouth. In

his attire he was somewhat formal, and he affected an antiquated style

in the fashion of his dress. When he spoke, his words fell with measured

precision from his lips; but the mellow tone of his voice, and a certain

courteous empressement in his manner, at once interested me in his

favour; and I set him down in my mind as a gentleman of the old English

school. How far I was right in my conjecture my readers will hereafter

have an opportunity of determining.

“Our new member,” said the chairman, turning towards me, “should now be

informed that we have amongst us some individuals who possess a taste

for literary pursuits.”

“A very small taste,” whispered a droll-looking ‘Puff,’ with a

particularly florid nose, who was sitting on my right hand, and who

appeared to be watching all the evening for opportunities of letting off

his jokes, which were always applauded longest and loudest by himself.

My comical neighbour’s name, I afterwards learned, was Bayles; he was

the licensed jester of the club; he had been a punster from his youth;

and it was his chief boast that he had joked himself into the best

society and out of the largest fortune of any individual in the three

kingdoms.

This incorrigible wag having broken the thread of the chairman’s speech,

I shall only add the substance of it. It was, that the literary members

of the “Puffs” had agreed to contribute from time to time articles in

prose and verse; tales, legends, and sketches of life and manners—all

which contributions were deposited in the mahogany box on the table; and

from this literary fund a paper was extracted by the chairman on one of

the nights of meeting in each week, and read by him aloud to the club.

These manuscripts, I need scarcely say, will form the series of THE PUFF

PAPERS, which, for the special information of the thousands of the fair

sex who will peruse them, are like the best black teas, strongly

recommended for their fine curling leaf.

The first paper drawn by the chairman was an Irish Tale; which, after a

humorous protest by Mr. Bayles against the introduction of foreign

extremities, was ordered to be read.

The candles being snuffed, and the chairman’s spectacles adjusted to the

proper focus, he commenced as follows:—

THE GIANT’S STAIRS. A LEGEND OF THE SOUTH OF IRELAND. “Don’t be for

quitting us so airly, Felix, ma bouchal, it’s a taring night without,

and you’re better sitting there opposite that fire than facing this

unmarciful storm,” said Tim Carthy, drawing his stool closer to the

turf-piled hearth, and addressing himself to a young man who occupied a

seat in the chimney nook, whose quick bright eye and somewhat humorous

curl of the corner of the mouth indicated his character pretty

accurately, and left no doubt that he was one of those who would laugh

their laugh out, if the ould boy stood at the door. The reply to Tim’s

proposal was a jerk of Felix’s great-coat on his left shoulder, and a

sly glance at the earthen mug which he held, as he gradually bent it

from its upright position, until it was evident that the process of

absorption had been rapidly acting on its contents. Tim, who understood

the freemasonry of the manoeuvre, removed all the latent scruples of

Felix by adding—“There’s more of that stuff—where you know; and by the

crook of St. Patrick we’ll have another drop of it to comfort us this

blessed night. Whisht! do you hear how the wind comes sweeping over the

hills? God help the poor souls at say!”

“Wissha amen!” replied Tim’s wife, dropping her knitting, and devoutly

making the sign of the cross upon her forehead.

A silence of a few moments ensued; during which, each person present

offered up a secret prayer for the safety of those who might at that

moment be exposed to the fury of the warring elements.

I should here inform my readers that the cottage of Tim Carthy was

situated in the deep valley which runs inland from the strand at

Monkstown, a pretty little bathing village, that forms an interesting

object on the banks of the romantic Lee, near the “beautiful city” of

Cork.

[pg 243]

“I never heard such a jearful storm since the night Mahoon, the ould

giant, who lives in the cave under the Giants Stairs, sunk the three

West Ingee-men that lay at anchor near the rocks,” observed Mrs. Carthy.

“It’s Felix can tell us, if he plazes, a quare story about that same

Mahoon,” added Tim, addressing himself to the young man.

“You’re right there, anyhow, Tim,” replied Felix; “and as my pipe is

just out, I’ll give you the whole truth of the story as if I was after

kissing the book upon it.

“You must know, then, it was one fine morning near Midsummer, about five

years ago, that I got up very airly to go down to the beach and launch

my boat, for I meant to try my luck at fishing for conger eels under the

Giant’s Stairs. I wasn’t long pulling to the spot, and I soon had my

lines baited and thrown out; but not so much as a bite did I get to keep

up my spirits all that blessed morning, till I was fairly kilt with

fatigue and disappointment. Well, I was thinking of returning home

again, when all at once I felt something mortial heavy upon one of my

lines. At first I thought it was a big conger, but then I knew that no

fish would hang so dead upon my hand, so I hauled in with fear and

thrembling, for I was afeard every minnit my line or my hook would

break, and at last I got my prize to the top of the water, and then safe

upon the gunnel of the boat;—and what do you think it was?”

“In troth, Felix, sorra one of us knows.”

“Well, then, it was nothing else but a little dirty black oak box,

hooped round with iron, and covered with say-weed and barnacles, as if

it had lain a long time in the water. ‘Oh, ho!’ says myself, ‘it’s in

rale good luck I am this beautiful morning. Phew! as sure as turf, ’tis

full of goold, or silver, or dollars, the box is.’ For, by dad, it was

so heavy intirely I could scarcely move it, and it sunk my little boat

a’most to the water’s edge; so I pulled back for bare life to the shore,

and ran the boat into a lonesome little creek in the rocks. There I

managed somehow to heave out the little box upon dry land, and, finding

a handy lump of a stone, I wasn’t long smashing the iron fastenings, and

lifting up the lid. I looked in, and saw a weeshy ould weasened fellow

sitting in it, with his legs gothered up under him like a tailor. He was

dressed in a green coat, all covered with goold lace, a red scarlet

waistcoat down to his hips, and a little three-cornered cocked hat upon

the top of his head, with a cock’s feather sticking out of it as smart

as you plase.

“‘Good morrow to you, Felix Donovan,’ says the small chap, taking off

his hat to me, as polite as a dancing-masther.

“‘Musha! then the tip top of the morning to you,’ says I, ‘it’s ashamed

of yourself you ought to be, for putting me to such a dale of throuble.’

“‘Don’t mention it, Felix,’ says he, ‘I’ll be proud to do as much for

you another time. But why don’t you open the box, and let me out? ’tis

many a long day I have been shut up here in this could dark place.’ All

the time I was only holding the lid partly open.

“‘Thank you kindly, my tight fellow,’ says myself, quite ’cute; ‘maybe

you think I don’t know you, but plase God you’ll not stir a peg out of

where you are until you pay me for my throuble.’

“‘Millia murdher!’ says the little chap. ‘What could a poor crather like

me have in the world? Haven’t I been shut up here without bite or sup?’

and then he began howling and bating his head agin the side of the box,

and making most pitiful moans. But I wasn’t to be deceived by his

thricks, so I put down the lid of the box and began to hammer away at

it, when he roared out,—

“‘Tare an’ agers! Felix Donovan, sure you won’t be so cruel as to shut

me up again? Open the box, man, till I spake to you.’

“‘Well, what do you want now’!’ savs I, lifting up the lid the laste

taste in life.

“‘I’ll tell you what, Felix, I’ll give you twenty goolden guineas if

you’ll let me out.’

“‘Soft was your horn, my little fellow; your offer don’t shoot.’

“‘I’ll give you fifty.

“‘No.’

“‘A hundred.’

“’T won’t do. If you were to offer me all the money in the Cork bank I

wouldn’t take it.’

“‘What the diaoul will you take then?’ says the little ould chap,

reddening like a turkey-cock in the gills with anger.

“‘I’ll tell you,’ says I, making answer; ‘I’ll take the three best gifts

that you can bestow.’”

(To be continued.)

Why is a butcher like a language master?—Because he is a retailer of

tongues.

THE KNATCHBULL TESTIMONIAL. A meeting, unequalled in numbers and

respectability, was held during the past week at the sign of “The

Conservative Cauliflower,” Duck-lane, Westminster, for the purpose of

presenting an address, and anything else, that the meeting might decide

upon, to Sir Edward Knatchbull, for his patriotic opposition to ’pikes.

Mr. ADAM BELL, the well-known literary dustman, was unanimously called

to the Chair. The learned gentleman immediately responded to the call,

and having gracefully removed his fan tail with one hand and his pipe

with the other, bowed to the assembled multitude, and deposited himself

in the seat of honour. As there was no hammer in the room, the inventive

genius of the learned chairman, suggested the substitution of his bell,

and having agitated its clapper three times, and shouted “Orger” with

stentorian emphasis, he proceeded to address the meeting:—

“Wedgetable wendors and purweyors of promiscus poulte-ry, it isn’t often

that a cheer is taken in this room for no other than harmonic meetings

or club-nights, and it is, therefore, with oncommon pride that I feels

myself in my present proud persition. (Werry good! and Hear, hear!) You

are all pretty well aware of my familiar acquaintance with the nobs of

this here great nation. (We is! and cheers.) For some years I’ve had the

honour to collect for Mr. Dark, night and day, I may say; and in my mind

the werry best standard of a real gentleman is his dust-hole. (Hear,

hear! and He’s vide avake!) You’re hailed,” continued the eloquent Adam,

“you’re hailed by a sarvant in a dimity jacket; you pulls up alongside

of the curb; you collars your basket, and with your shovel in your

mawley, makes a cast into the hairy; one glance at the dust conwinces

you vether you’re to have sixpence or a swig of lamen-table beer. (It

does! and cheers.) A man as sifteses his dust is a disgrace to humanity!

(Immense cheering, which was rendered more exhilarating by the

introduction of Dirk’s dangle-dangles, otherwise bells.) But you’ll say,

Vot is this here to do with Sir Eddard? I’ll tell you. It has been my

werry great happiness to clear out Sir Eddard, and werry well I was paid

for doing it. The Tories knows what jobs is, and pays according-ly.

(Here the Meeting gave the Conservative Costermonger fire.) The ’pinion

I then formed of Sir Eddard has jist been werrified, for hasn’t he comed

forrard to oppose them rascally taxes on commercial industry and

Fairlop-fair—on enterprising higgling and ‘twelve in a tax-cart?’ need I

say I alludes to them blessed ‘pikes? (Long and continued cheers.) Sir

Eddard is fully aware that the ‘pike-men didn’t make the dirt that makes

the road, and werry justly refuses to fork out tuppence-ha’penny! It’s

werry true Sir Eddard says that the t’other taxes must be paid, as

what’s to pay the ministers? But it’s highly unreasonable that ’pike-men

is to be put alongside of Prime Ministers, wedgetable wendors, and

purveyors of promiscus polte-ry! Had that great man succeeded in bilking

the toll, what a thing it would ha’ been for us! Gatter is but 3d. a

pot, and that’s the price of a reasonable ‘pike-ticket. That wenerable

and wenerated liquor as bears the cognominum of ‘Old Tom’ is come-atable

for the walley of them werry browns. But Sir Eddard has failed in his

bould endeavour—the ’pikes has it! (Shame!) It’s for us to reward him. I

therefore proposes that a collection of turnpike tickets is made, and

then elegantly mounted, framed and glaziered, and presented to the Right

Honourable Barrownight.” (Immense applause.)

Mr. ALEC BILL JONES, the celebrated early-tater and spring-ingen dealer,

seconded the proposition, at the same time suggesting that “Old ’pike-

tickets would do as well as new ’uns; and everybody know’d that second-

hand tumpike-tickets warn’t werry waluable, so the thing could be done

handsome and reasonable.”

A collection was immediately commenced in the room, and in a few minutes

the subscription included the whole of the Metropolitan trusts, together

with three Waterloo-bridge tickets, which the donor stated “could ony be

’ad for axing for.”

A deputation was then formed for the purpose of presenting this unique

testimonial when completed to Sir Edward Knatchbull.

It is rumoured that the lessees of the gates in the neighbourhood of the

Metropolis are trying to get up a counter meeting. We have written to

Mr. Levy on the subject.

MUSICAL NEWS (NOOSE). We perceive from a foreign paper that a criminal

who has been imprisoned for a considerable period at Presburg has

acquired a complete mastery over the violin. It has been announced that

he will shortly make an appearance in public. Doubtless, his performance

will be a solo on one string.

[pg 244] THE PHYSIOLOGY OF THE LONDON MEDICAL STUDENT. 10.—THE

TERMINATION OF THE HALL EXAMINATION. A person stands with arms

outstretched holding a knife in each hand to form a letter T he morning

after the carousal reported in our last chapter, the parties thereat

assisting are dispersed in various parts of London. Did a modern

Asmodeus take a spectator to any elevated point from which he could

overlook the Great Metropolis of Mr. Grant and England just at this

period, when Aurora has not long called the sun, who rises as surlily as

if he had got out of bed the wrong way, he would see Mr. Rapp ruminating

upon things in general whilst seated on some cabbages in Covent Garden

Market; Mr. Jones taking refreshment with a lamplighter and two cabmen

at a promenade coffee-stand near Charing Cross, to whom he is giving a

lecture upon the action of veratria in paralysis, jumbled somehow or

other with frequent asseverations that he shall at all times be happy to

see the aforesaid lamplighter and two cabmen at the hospital or his own

lodgings; Mr. Manhug, with a pocket-handkerchief tied round his head,

not clearly understanding what has become of his latch-key, but rather

imagining that he threw it into a lamp instead of the short pipe which

still remains in the pocket of his pea-jacket, and, moreover, finding

himself close to London Bridge, is taking a gratuitous doze in the cabin

of the Boulogne steam-boat, which he ascertains does not start until

eight o’clock; whilst Mr. Simpson, the new man, with the usual destiny

of such green productions—thirsty, nauseated, and “coming round”—is

safely taken care of in one of the small private unfurnished apartments

which are let by the night on exceedingly moderate terms (an

introduction by a policeman of known respectability being all the

reference that is required) in the immediate neighbourhood of the Bow-

street Police-office. Where Mr. Muff is—it is impossible to form the

least idea; he may probably speak for himself.

The reader will now please to shift the time and place to two o’clock

P.M. in the dissecting-room, which is full of students, comprising three

we have just spoken of, except Mr. Simpson. A message has been received

that the anatomical teacher is unavoidably detained at an important case

in private practice, and cannot meet his class to day. Hereupon there is

much rejoicing amongst the pupils, who gather in a large semicircle

round the fireplace, and devise various amusing methods of passing the

time. Some are for subscribing to buy a set of four-corners, to be

played in the museum when the teachers are not there, and kept out of

sight in an old coffin when they are not wanted. Others vote for getting

up sixpenny sweepstakes, and raffling for them with dice—the winner of

each to stand a pot out of his gains, and add to the goodly array of

empty pewters which already grace the mantelpiece in bright order, with

the exception of two irregulars, one of which Mr. Rapp has squeezed flat

to show the power of his hand; and in the bottom of the other Mr. Manhug

has bored a foramen with a red-hot poker in a laudable attempt to warm

the heavy that it contained. Two or three think they had better adjourn

to the nearest slate table and play a grand pool; and some more vote for

tapping the preparations in the museum, and making the porter of the

dissecting-room intoxicated with the grog manufactured from the proof

spirit. The various arguments are, however, cut short by the entrance of

Mr. Muff, who rushes into the room, followed by Mr. Simpson, and

throwing off his macintosh cape, pitches a large fluttering mass of

feathers into the middle of the circle.

“Halloo, Muff! how are you, my bean—what’s up?” is the general

exclamation.

“Oh, here’s a lark!” is all Mr. Muff’s reply.

“Lark!” cries Mr. Rapp; “you’re drunk, Muff—you don’t mean to call that

a lark!”

“It’s a beautiful patriarchal old hen,” returns Mr. Muff, “that I

bottled as she was meandering down the mews; and now I vote we have her

for lunch. Who’s game to kill her?”

Various plans are immediately suggested, including cutting her head off,

poisoning her with morphia, or shooting her with a little cannon Mr Rapp

has got in his locker; but at last the majority decide upon hanging her.

A gibbet is speedily prepared, simply consisting of a thigh-bone laid

across two high stools; a piece of whip cord is then noosed round the

victim’s neck; and she is launched into eternity, as the newspapers

say—Mr. Manhug attending to pull her legs.

“Depend upon it that’s a humane death,” remarks Mr. Jones. “I never

tried to strangle a fowl but once, and then I twisted its neck bang off.

I know a capital plan to finish cats though.”

“Throw it off—put it up—let’s have it,” exclaim the circle.

“Well, then; you must get their necks in a slip knot and pull them up to

a key-hole. They can’t hurt you, you know, because you are the other

side the door.

“Oh, capital—quite a wrinkle,” observes Mr. Muff. “But how do you catch

them first?”

“Put a hamper outside the leads with some valerian in it, and a bit of

cord tied to the lid. If you keep watch, you may bag half-a-dozen in no

time; and strange cats are fair game for everybody,—only some of them

are rum ’uns to bite.”

At this moment, a new Scotch pupil, who is lulling himself into the

belief that he is studying anatomy from some sheep’s eyes by himself in

the Museum, enters the dissecting-room, and mildly asks the porter “what

a heart is worth?”

“I don’t know, sir,” shouts Mr. Rapp; “it depends entirely upon what’s

trumps;” whereupon the new Scotch pupil retires to his study as if he

was shot, followed by several pieces of cinders and tobacco-pipe,

During the preceding conversation, Mr. Muff cuts down the victim with a

scalpel; and, finding that life has departed, commences to pluck it, and

perform the usual post-mortem abdominal examinations attendant upon such

occasions. Mr. Rapp undertakes to manufacture an extempore spit, from

the rather dilapidated umbrella of the new Scotch pupil, which he has

heedlessly left in the dissecting-room. This being completed, with the

assistance of some wire from the ribs of an old skeleton that had hung

in a corner of the room ever since it was built, the hen is put down to

roast, presenting the most extraordinary specimen of trussing upon

record. Mr. Jones undertakes to buy some butter at a shop behind the

hospital; and Mr. Manhug, not being able to procure any flour, gets some

starch from the cabinet of the lecturer on Materia Medica, and powders

it in a mortar which he borrows from the laboratory.

“To revert to cats,” observes Mr. Manhug, as he sets himself before the

fire to superintend the cooking; “it strikes me we could contrive no end

to fun if we each agreed to bring some here one day in carpet-bags. We

could drive in plenty of dogs, and cocks, and hens, out of the back

streets, and then let them all loose together in the dissecting-room.”

“With a sprinkling of rats and ferrets,” adds Mr. Rapp. “I know a man

who can let us have as many as we want. The skrimmage would be immense,

only I shouldn’t much care to stay and see it.”

“Oh that’s nothing,” replies Mr. Muff. “Of course, we must get on the

roof and look at it through the skylights. You may depend upon it, it

would be the finest card we ever played.”

How gratifying to every philanthropist must be these proofs of the

elasticity of mind peculiar to a Medical Student! Surrounded by scenes

of the most impressive and deplorable nature—in constant association

with death and contact with disease—his noble spirit, in the ardour of

his search after professional information, still retains its buoyancy

and freshness; and he wreaths with roses the hours which he passes in

the dissecting-room, although the world in general looks upon it as a

rather unlikely locality for those flowers to shed their perfume over!

“By the way, Muff, where did you get to last night after we all cut?”

inquires Mr. Rapp.

“Why, that’s what I am rather anxious to find out myself,” replies Mr.

Muff; “but I think I can collect tolerably good reminiscences of my

travels.”

“Tell us all about it then,” cry three or four.

“With pleasure—only let’s have in a little more beer; for the heat of

the fire in cooking produces rather too rapid an evaporation of fluids

from the surface of the body.”

“Oh, blow your physiology!” says Rapp. “You mean to say you’ve got a hot

copper—so have I. Send for the precious balm, and then fire away.”

And accordingly, when the beer arrives, Mr. Muff proceeds with the

recital of his wanderings.

LOVE AND HYMEN. Cupid (that charming little garcon),

When free, is am’rous, brisk, and gay;

But when he’s noos’d by Hymen’s parson,

Snores like Glenelg, or flies away.

[pg 245] OUR CITY ARTICLE. An alarming forgery of Mendicity Society’s

tickets has been discovered in Red Lion Square, and has caused much

conversation at the doors of most of the gin palaces. Our readers are

probably aware what these tickets are, though, being a particular class

of security, there is not a great deal publicly done in them. They are

issued to certain subscribers, who pay a guinea per year towards housing

a Secretary and some other officers in a moderate-sized house, in the

kitchen of which certain soup is prepared, which is partaken of by a

number of persons called the Board, who are said to taste it and see

that it is good; and if there is any left, which may occasionally

happen, the poor are allowed to finish it. This valuable privilege is

secured by tickets; and these tickets are found to be forged to a very

large amount—some say indeed to the amount of 14,000 basins. It is not

usual to pay off these soup tickets, but a sort of interest can be had

upon them by standing just over the railings of the house in Red Lion

Square, when the Secretary’s dinner is being cooked or served up, and a

certain amount of savoury steam is then put into circulation. The house

has been besieged all day with “innocent holders,” who, on giving their

tickets in, cannot get them back again. The genuine tickets are known by

the stamp, which is a soup plate rampant, and a spoon argent,—the latter

being the emblem of the subscribers.

A great deal is said of a new company, whose object is to take advantage

of a well-known fact in chemistry. It is known that diamonds can be

resolved into charcoal, as well as that charcoal can be ultimately

reduced to air; and a company is to be founded with the view of simply

reversing the process. Instead of getting air from diamonds, their

object will be to get diamonds from air; and in fact the chief promoters

of it have generally drawn from that source the greater part of their

capital. The whole sum for shares need not be paid up at once; but the

Directors will be satisfied in the first instance with 10 per cent. on

the whole sum to be raised from the adventurers. It is intended to

declare a dividend at the earliest possible period, which will be

directly the first diamond has been made by the new process.

CON. BY SIBTHORP AND STULTZ. Why are batteries and soldiers like the

hands and feet of tailors?—Because the former make breaches (breeches),

and the latter pass through them.

THE ROMANCE OF A TEACUP. SIP THE THIRD. GOS-SIP. That hour devoted to

thy vesper “service”—

Dulcet exhilaration! glorious tea!—

I deem my happiest. Howsoe’er I swerve, as

To mind or morals, elsewhere, over thee

I am a perfect creature, quite impervious

To care, or tribulation, or ennui—

In fact, I do agnize to thee an utter

Devotion even to the bread and butter.

The homely kettle hissing on the bar—

(Urns I detest, irrelevant pomposities)—

The world beyond the window-blinds, as far

As I can thrust it—this defines what “cosset” is—

What woe that rhyme such scene of bliss must mar!

But rhyme, alas! is one of my atrocities;

In common with those bards who have the scratch

Of writing, and are all right with Catnach.

“How Nancy Sniggles was the village pride,—

How Will, her sweetheart, went to be a sailor;

How much at parting Nancy Sniggles cried,—

And how she snubb’d her funny friend the tailor;

How William boldly fought and bravely died;

How Nancy Sniggles felt her senses fail her—”

Then comes a sad dénouement—now-a-days

It is not virtue dominant that pays.

Such tales, in this, the post-octavo age,

Our novelists incontinently tells us—

Tales, wherein lovely heroines engage

With highwaymen, good-looking rogues but callous,

Who go on swimmingly till the last page,

And then take poison to escape the gallows—

Tales, whose original refinement teaches

The pride of eloquence in—dying speeches!

What an apotheosis have we here!

What equal laws th’ awards of fame dispose!

Capture a fort—assassinate a peer—

Alike be chronicled in startling prose—

Alike be dramatised—(how near

Is clever crime to virtue!)—at Tussaud’s

Be grouped with all the criminals at large,

From burglar Sheppard unto fiend Laffarge!

The women are best judges after all!

And Sheridan was right, and Plagi-ary;

To their decision all things mundane fall,

From court to counting-house; from square to dairy;

From caps to chemistry; from tract to shawl,

And then these female verdicts never vary!

In fact, on lap-dogs, lovers, buhl, and boddices,

There are no critics like these mortal goddesses!

To please such readers, authors make it answer

To trace a pedigree to the creation

Of some old Saxon peer; a monstrous grandsire,

Whose battles tell, in print, to admiration—

But I, unfortunate, have never once a

Mysterious hint of any great relation;

I know whether Shem or Japhet—right sir—

Was my progenitor—nor care a kreutzer.

For, though there’s matter for regret in losing

An opportune occasion to record

The feats in gambling, duelling, seducing—

Conventional acquirements of a lord—

Still I have stories startling and amusing,

Which I can tell and vouch, upon my word.

To anybody who desires to hear ’em—

But don’t be nervous, pray,—you needn’t fear ’em.

But what of my poor Hy-son all this while?

She saved the gardener by a timely kiss.

Few husbands are there proof against a smile,

And Te-pott’s rage endured no more than this.

Ah, reader! gentle, moral, free from guile,

Think you she did so very much amiss?

She was not love-sick for the fellow quite—

She merely thought of him—from morn till night!

A state of mind how much by parents dreaded!

(By those outrageous parents, English mammas,

Who scarcely own their daughters till they’re wedded)—

How postulant of patent Chubbs and Bramahs!

And eyes—the safest locks when locks are needed!—

And Abigails, and homilies, and grammars;

And other antidotes for “detrimentals”—

Id est, fine gentlemen unblest with rentals.

But this could not stop here; nor did it stop—

For both were anxious for—an explanation.

And in the harem’s grating was a gap,

Whence Hy-son peep’d in modest hesitation;

While on his spade the gardener would prop

Himself, and issue looks of adoration;

Until it happen’d, like a lucky rhyme,

Each for the other look’d at the same time.

Then fell the gardener upon his knees,

And kiss’d his hand in manner most devout—

So Hy-son couldn’t find the heart to tease

The poor dear man by being in a pout;—

Besides, she might go walk among the trees,

And not a word of scandal be made out.

She thought a—very—little more upon it,

Then smiled to Sou-chong,—and put on her bonnet.

PUNCH AND THE SWISS GIANTESS! SHERIFFS’ COURT.—WEDNESDAY. BONBON versus

PUNCH. [This important cause came on for trial on Wednesday last. That

it has not been reported in the morning papers is doubtless to be

attributed to the most reckless bribery on the part of the plaintiff. He

has, no doubt, sought to hush up his infamy; the defendant has no such

contemptible cowardice. Hence a special reporter was engaged for PUNCH.

The trial is given here, firstly, for the beautiful illustration it

affords of the philosophy of the English law of crim. con.; and secondly

on a principle—for PUNCH has principles—laid down by the defendant in

his course of public life, to show himself to the world the man he

really is. In pursuit of this moral and philosophical object, should the

waywardness of his genius ever induce PUNCH to cut a throat, pick a

pocket, or, as a Middlesex magistrate (for PUNCH has been upon the bench

many a year), to offer for sale a tempting lot of liberty to any

competent captive,—should PUNCH rob as a vulgar Old Bailey delinquent,

or genteelly swindle as an Aldermanic share-holder,—in each and every of

these cases there will, on discovery, be the fullest report of the same

in PUNCH’S own paper, PUNCH being deeply impressed with the belief that

an exhibition of the weaknesses of a great man [pg 246] is highly

beneficial to public philosophy and public morals. PUNCH now retires in

favour of his “own” reporter.]

As early as six o’clock in the morning, the neighbourhood of the court

presented a most lively and bustling aspect. Carriages continued to

arrive from the west-end; and we recognised scores of ladies whose names

are familiar to the readers of the Court Journal and Morning Post.

Several noblemen, amateurs of the subject, arrived on horseback. By

eight o’clock the four sides of Red Lion-square were, if we may be

allowed the metaphor, a mass of living heads. We owe a debt of gratitude

to Mr. Davis, the respected and conscientious officer for the Sheriff of

Middlesex; that gentleman, in the kindest spirit of hospitality,

allowing us six inches of his door-step when the crowd was at its

greatest pressure. Several inmates of Mr. Davis’s delightful mansion had

a charming view of the scene from the top windows, where we observed

bars of the most picturesque and moyen age description. At ten minutes

to nine, Mr. Charles Phillips, counsel for the plaintiff, arrived in

Lamb’s Conduit-passage, and was loudly cheered. On the appearance of Mr.

Adolphus, counsel for the defendant, a few miscreants in human shape

essayed groans and hisses; they were, however, speedily put down by the

New Police.

We entered the court at nine o’clock. The galleries were crowded with

rank, beauty, and fashion. Conflicting odours of lavender, musk, and Eau

de Cologne emanated from ladies on the bench, most of whom were

furnished with opera-glasses, sandwich-boxes, and species of flasks,

vulgarly known as pocket-pistols. In all our experience we never

recollect such a thrill as that shot through the court, when the crier

of the same called out—

BONBON v. PUNCH! Mr. SMITH (a young yet rising barrister with green

spectacles) with delicate primness opened the case. A considerable

pause, when—

Mr. CHARLES PHILLIPS, having successfully struggled with his feelings,

rose to address the court for the plaintiff. The learned gentleman said

it had been his hard condition as a barrister to see a great deal of

human wickedness; but the case which, most reluctantly, he approached

that day, made him utterly despair of the heart of man. He felt ashamed

of his two legs, knowing that the defendant in this case was a biped. He

had a horror of the mysterious iniquities of human nature—seeing that

the defendant was a man, a housekeeper, and, what in this case trebled

his infamy, a husband and a father. Gracious Heaven! when he

reflected—but no; he would confine himself to a simple statement of

facts. That simplicity would tell with a double-knock on the hearts of a

susceptible jury. The afflicted, the agonised plaintiff was a public

man. He was, until lately, the happy possessor of a spotless wife and an

inimitable spring-van. It was was a union assented to by reason, smiled

on by prudence. Mr. Bonbon was the envied owner of a perambulating

exhibition: he counted among his riches a Spotted Boy, a New Zealand

Cannibal, and a Madagascar Cow. The crowning rose was, however, to be

gathered, and he plucked, and (as he fondly thought) made his own for

ever, the Swiss Giantess! Mr. Bonbon had wealth in his van—the lady had

wealth in herself; hence it was, in every respect, what the world would

denominate an equal match.

The learned counsel said he would call witnesses to prove the blissful

atmosphere in which the parties lived, until the defendant, like a

domestic upas-tree, tainted and polluted it. That van was another Eden,

until PUNCH, the serpent, entered. The lady was a native of

Switzerland—yes, of Switzerland. Oh, that he (the learned gentleman)

could follow her to her early home!—that he could paint her with the

first blush and dawn of innocence, tinting her virgin cheek as the

morning sun tinted the unsullied snows of her native Jungfrau!—that he

could lead the gentlemen of the jury to that Swiss cottage where the

gentle Félicité (such was the lady’s name) lisped her early prayer—that

he could show them the mountains that had echoed with her songs (since

made so very popular by Madame Stockhausen)—that he could conjure up in

that court the goats whose lacteal fluid was wont to yield to the

pressure of her virgin fingers—the kids that gambolled and made holiday

about her—the birds that whistled in her path—the streams that flowed at

her feet—the avalanches, with their majestic thunder, that fell about

her. Would he could subpoena such witnesses! then would the jury feel,

what his poor words could never make them feel—the loss of his injured

client. On one hand would be seen the simple Swiss maiden—a violet among

the rocks—a mountain dove—an inland pearl—a rainbow of the glaciers—a

creature pure as her snows, but not as cold; and on the other the fallen

wife—a monument of shame! This was a commercial country; and the jury

would learn with additional horror that it was in the sweet confidence

of a commercial transaction that the defendant obtained access to his

interesting victim. Yes, gentlemen, (said Mr. P.,) it was under the

base, the heartless, the dastardly excuse of business, that the

plaintiff poured his venom in the ear of a too confiding woman. He had

violated the sacred bonds of human society—the noblest ties that hold

the human heart—the sweetest tendrils that twine about human affections.

This should be shown to the jury. Letters from the plaintiff would be

read, in which his heart—or rather that ace of spades he carried in his

breast and called his heart—would be laid bare in open court. But the

gentlemen of the jury would teach a terrible lesson that day. They would

show that the socialist should not guide his accursed bark into the

tranquil seas of domestic comfort, and anchor it upon the very

hearthstone of conjugal felicity. No—as the gentlemen of the jury were

husbands and fathers, as they were fathers and not husbands, as they

were neither one nor the other, but hoped to be both—they would that day

hurl such a thunderbolt at the pocket of the defendant—they would so

thrice-gild the incurable ulcers of the plaintiff, that all the

household gods of the United Empire would hymn them to their mighty

rest, and Hymen himself keep continual carnival at their amaranthine

hearths. “Gentlemen of the jury (said the learned counsel in

conclusion), I leave you with a broken heart in your hands! A broken

heart, gentlemen! Creation’s masterpiece, flawed cracked, SHIVERED TO

BITS! See how the blood flows from it—mark where its strings are cut and

cut—its delicate fibres violated—its primitive aroma evaporated to all

the winds of heaven. Make that heart your own, gentlemen, and say at how

many pounds you value the demoniac damage. And oh, may your verdict

still entitle you to the blissful confidence of that divine, purpureal

sex, the fairest floral specimens of which I see before me! May their

unfolding fragrance make sweet your daily bread; and when you die, from

the tears of conjugal love, may thyme and sweet marjoram spring and

blossom above your graves!”

Here the emotion of the court was unparalleled in the memory of the

oldest attorney. Showers of tears fell from the gallery, so that there

was a sudden demand for umbrellas.

The learned counsel sat down, and, having wiped his eyes, ate a

sandwich.

There were other letters, but we have selected the least glowing. Mr.

Charles Phillips then called his witnesses.

Peter Snooks examined: Was employed by plaintiff; recollected defendant

coming to the van to propose a speculation, in which Madame Bonbon was

to play with him. Defendant came very often when plaintiff was out. Once

caught Madame Bonbon on defendant’s knee. Once heard Madame Bonbon say,

“Bless your darling nose!” Was sure it was defendant’s nose. Was shocked

at her levity, but consented to go for gin—Madame found the money. Had a

glass myself, and drank their healths. Plaintiff never beat his wife; he

couldn’t: they were of very uneven habits; she was seven feet four,

plaintiff was four feet seven.

Cross-examined by Mr. Adolphus: Plaintiff was dreadfully afflicted at

infidelity of his wife: had become quite desperate—never sober since;

was never sober before. On first night of the news plaintiff was quite

delirious; took six plates of alamode beef, and two pots of porter.

Sarah Pillowcase examined: Was chambermaid at the Tinder-box and Flint,

New Cut; had known defendant since she was a child—also knew plaintiff’s

wife. They came together on the 1st of April, about twelve at night.

Understood they had been in a private box at the Victoria with an order.

They had twelve dozen of oysters for supper, and eight Welch-rabbits:

the lady found the money. Thought, of course, they were married, or

would rather have died than have served them. They made a hearty

breakfast: the lady found the money.

Cross-examined by Mr. Adolphus: Would swear to the lady, as she had once

paid a shilling to see her.

(Here it was intimated by the learned judge that ladies might leave the

court if they chose; it was evident, however, that no lady heard such

intimation, as no lady stirred.)

Cross-examination continued: Yes, would swear it. Knew the obligation of

an oath, and would swear it.

This ended the case for the plaintiff.

Mr. ADOLPHUS addressed the court for the defendant. He had not the

golden tongue—no, he was not blessed with the oratory of his learned

friend. He would therefore confine himself to the common sense view of

the question. He was not talking to Arcadian shepherds (he was very

happy to see his own butcher in the jury-box), but to men of business.

If there had been any arts practised, it was on the side of the

plaintiff’s wife. His client had visited the plaintiff out of pure

compassion. The plaintiff’s show was a failing concern; his client, with

a benevolence which had marked his long career, wished to give him the

benefit of his own attractions, joined to those of the woman. Well, the

plaintiff knew the value of money, and therefore left his wife and the

defendant to arrange the affair between them. “Gentlemen of the jury,”

continued the learned counsel, “it must appear to you, that on the part

of the plaintiff this is not an affair of the heart, but a matter of the

breeches’ pocket. He leaves his wife—a fascinating, versatile

creature—with my client, I confess it, an acknowledged man of gallantry.

Well, the result is—what was to be expected. My learned friend has

dwelt, with his accustomed eloquence, on his client’s broken heart. I

will not speak of his heart; but I must say that the man who, bereaved

of the partner of his bosom, can still eat six plates of alamode beef,

must have a most excellent stomach. Gentlemen, beware of giving heavy

damages in this case, or otherwise you will unconsciously be the

promoters of great immorality. This is no paradox, gentlemen; for I am

credibly informed that if the man succeed in getting large damages, he

will immediately take his wife home to his bosom and his van, and

instead of exhibiting her, as he has hitherto done, for one penny, he

will, on the strength of the notoriety of this trial, and as a man

knowing the curiosity of society, immediately advance that penny to

threepence. You will, therefore, consider your verdict, gentlemen, and

give such moderate damages as will entirely mend the plaintiff’s broken

heart.”

The jury, without retiring from the box, returned a verdict of “Damages

One Farthing!”

We are credibly informed—though the evidence was not adduced in

court—that Monsieur Bonbon first suspected his dishonour from his wife’s

hair papers. She had most negligently curled her tresses in the soft

paper epistles of her innamorato.

[pg 247] PUNCH’S PENCILLINGS.—No. XXI. A man with Cupid's wings sits in

a chair picking his teeth with an arrow. A quiver is marked 'Protocols'

CUPID OUT OF PLACE.

From a Sketch made in “THE PALMERSTON GALLERY.”

[pg 249] THE FETES FOR THE POLISH—AND FATE OF THE BRITISH POOR. “Charity

begins at home,” says, or rather said, an admirable old proverb; but

alack! the adage, or the times, or both, are out of joint—the wholesome

maxim has lost its force—and homes for Charity must now be far as the

Poles asunder, ere the benign influence of the weeping goddess can fall

upon its wretched supplicants.

In private life the neglect of a domestic hearth for the vainglorious

squandering abroad of the means that could and ought to render that the

chief seat of comfort and independence, calls down upon the thoughtless

and heartless squanderer and abuser of his means the just indignation

and merited contempt of every thinking and properly constituted mind.

The “Charity” that does not begin at home is the worst species of

unjustifiable prodigality, and the first step to the absolute ruin of

the “nearest and dearest” for the sake of the profligate and abandoned.

And no sophistry can justify the apparent liberality that deprives

others of their just and urgent dues.

It may be and is most noble to feed the widow and to clothe the orphan;

but where is the beneficence of the deed if the wife and children of the

ostentatious donor—the victims of the performance of such acts—are left

themselves to endure misery and privations, from which his inadequate

means cannot exempt the stranger and the giver’s own household!

The sparrow who unwittingly rears the cuckoo’s spurious offspring,

tending with care the ultimate destroyer of its own young, does so in

perfect ignorance of the results about to follow the misplaced

affection. The cravings of the interloper are satisfied to the detriment

of its own offspring; and when the full-fledged recipient of its

misplaced bounty no longer needs its aid, the thankless stranger wings

its way on its far-off course, selfishly careless of the fostering bird

that brought it into life; and this may be looked upon as one of the

results generally attendant upon a blind forgetfulness of where our

first endeavours for the amelioration of the wants of others should be

made.

It has ever been the crying sin of the vastly sympathetic to weep for

the miseries of the distant, and blink at the wretchedness their eyes—if

not their hearts—must ache to see. Their charity must have its proper

stage, their sentiments the proper objects,—and their imaginations the

undisturbed right to revel in the supposititious grievances of the far-

off wretched and oppressed. The poor black man! the tortured slave! the

benighted infidel! the debased image of his maker! the sunken bondsman!

These terms must be the “Open sesame” for the breasts from whence spring

bibles, bribes, blankets, glass beads, pocket-combs, tracts, teachers,

missions, and missionaries. Oppression is what they would put down; but

then the oppression must be of “foreign manufacture.” Your English,

genuine home-made article, though as superior in strength and endurance

as our own canvas is to the finest fold of gauze-like cambric, is in

their opinion a thing not worth a thought. A half oppressed Caffre is an

object of ten thousand times more sympathy than a wholly oppressed

Englishman; a half-starved Pole the more fitting recipient of the same

proportion of actual bounty to a wholly starving peasant of our own land

of law and liberty.

Let one-tenth the disgusting details so nobly exposed in the Times

newspaper, as to the frightful state of some of our legalised poor law

inquisitions, appear as extracts from the columns of a foreign journal,

stating such treatment to exist amongst a foreign population, and mark

the result. Why, the town would teem with meetings and the papers with

speeches. Royal, noble, and honourable chairmen and vice chairmen would

launch out their just anathemas against the heartless despots whose

realms were disgraced by such atrocities. Think, think of the aged poor

torn from their kindred, caged in a prison, refused all aid within,

debarred from every hope without,—think of the flesh, the very flesh,

rotting by slow degrees, and then in putrid masses falling from their

wretched bones: think, we say, on this—then give what name you can, save

murder, to their quickly succeeding death.

Fancy children—children that should be in their prime—so caged and fed

that the result is disease in its most loathsome form, and with all its

most appalling consequences! No hope! no flight! The yet untainted, as

it were, chained to the spot, with mute despair watching the slow

infection, and with breaking hearts awaiting the hour—the moment—when it

must reach to them!

We say, think of these things—not as if they were the doings in England,

and therefore legalised matters of course—but think of them as the arts

of some despot in a far-off colony, and oh, how all hearts would

burn—all tongues curse and call for vengeance on the abetors of such

atrocities!

The supporters of the rights of man would indeed pour forth their

eloquent denunciations against the oppressors of the absent. The poetry

of passion would be exhausted to depict the frightful state of the

crimeless and venerable victim of tyranny, bowing his grey hairs with

sorrow to the grave; while the wailing of the helpless innocents

different indeed in colour, but in heart and spirit like ourselves,

being sprung from the one great source, would echo throughout the land,

and find responses in every bosom not lost to the kindly feelings of

good-will towards its fellows! Had the would-be esteemed philanthropists

but these “foreign cues for passion,” they would indeed

“Drown the stage with tears,

And cleave the general ear with horrid speech;

Make mad the guilty, and appal the free;

Confound the ignorant; and amaze, indeed,

The very faculties of eyes and ears.”

But, alas! there is no such motive; these most destitute of

Destitution’s children are simply fellow-countrymen and fellow-

Christians. Sons of the same soil, and worshippers of the same God, they

need no good works in the way of proselyzation to save them from eternal

perdition; consequently they receive no help to keep them from temporal

torture.

To convince themselves that these remarks are neither unwarrantably

severe, nor in the slightest degree overcharged, let our readers not

only refer to the revolting doings chronicled in the Times, but let them

find the further illustration of this foreign penchant in the recent

doings at the magnificently-attended ball given in behalf of the Polish

Refugees, and consequently commanding the support of the humane,

enlightened, and charitable English; and then let them cast their eyes

over the cold shoulder turned towards a proposition for the same act of

charity being consummated for the relief of the poverty-stricken and

starving families of the destitute and deserving artisans now literally

starving under their very eyes, located no farther off than in the

wretched locality of Spitalfields! An opinion—and doubtless an honest

one—is given by the Lord Mayor, that any attempt to relieve their wants,

in the way found so efficacious for the Polish Refugees, would be

madness, inasmuch as it would, as heretofore, prove an absolute failure.

Reader, is there anything of the cuckoo and the sparrow in the above

assertion? Is it not true? And if it is so, is it not a more than crying

evil? Is it not a most vile blot upon our laws—a most beastly libel upon

our creed and our country? Is no relief ever to be given to the

immediate objects who should be the persons benefited by our bounty? Are

those who, in the prosperity proceeding from their unceasing and ill-

paid toil, added their quota to the succour of others, now that poverty

has fallen on them, to be left the sport of fortune and the slaves of

suffering? Do good, we say, in God’s name, to all, if good can be done

to all. But do not rob the lamb of its natural due—its mother’s

nourishment—to waste it on an alien. There is no spirit of illiberality

in these remarks; they are put forward to advocate the rights of our own

destitute countrymen—to claim for them a share of the lavish

commiseration bestowed on others—to call attention to the desolation of

their hearths—the wreck of their comforts—the awful condition of their

starving and dependent families—and to give the really charitable an

opportunity of reserving some of their kindnesses for home consumption.

Let this be their just object, and not one among the relieved would

withhold his mite from their suffering fellows in other climes. But in

Heaven’s name, let the adage root itself once more in every Englishman’s

“heart of hearts,” and once more let “Charity begin at home!”

THE FIRE AT THE ADELPHI THEATRE. Yates was nearly treating the

enlightened British public with an antidote to “the vast receptacle of

8,000 tons of water,” by setting fire to the saloon chimney. Great as

the consternation of the audience was in the front, it was far exceeded

by the alarm of the actors behind the curtain, for they are so sensible

of the manager’s daring genius, that they concluded he had set fire to

the house in order to convert “the space usually devoted to illusion

into the area of reality.” The great Mr. Freeborn actually rushed out of

the theatre without his rouge. Little Paul drank off a glass of neat

water. Mr. John Sanders was met at the end of Maiden Lane, with his legs

thrust into the sleeves of his coat, and the rest of his body encased in

the upper part of a property dragon; whilst little round Wilkinson was

vainly endeavouring to squeeze himself into a wooden waterspout. Had he

succeeded he might have applied for the reward offered by the Royal

Society for a method of

A man holds up a broken hoop, part of which has been straightened into

an L shape. SQUARING THE CIRCLE.

[pg 250] THE CRIMES OF EATING. Two whales 'kiss' to form a letter S. ir

Robert Peel and her Majesty’s Ministers have, we learn, taken a hint in

criminal jurisprudence from his Worship the Mayor of Reading, and are

now preparing a bill for Parliament, which they trust will be the means

of checking the alarming desire for food which has begun to spread

amongst the poorer classes of society. The crime of eating has latterly

been indulged in to such an immoderate extent by the operatives of

Yorkshire and the other manufacturing districts, that we do not wonder

at our sagacious Premier adopting strong measures to suppress the

unnatural and increasing appetites of the people.

Taking up the sound judicial views of the great functionary above

alluded to, who committed Bernard Cavanagh, the fasting man, to prison

for smelling at a saveloy and a slice of ham, Sir Robert has laid down a

graduated—we mean a sliding—scale of penalties for the crime of eating,

proportioning, with the most delicate skill, the exact amount of the

punishment to the enormity of the offence. By his profound wisdom he has

discovered that the great increase of crime in these countries is

entirely attributable to over-feeding the multitude. Like the worthy Mr.

Bumble, in “Oliver Twist,” he protests “it is meat and not madness” that

ails the people. He can even trace the origin of every felony to the

particular kind of food in which the felon has indulged. He detects

incipient incendiarism in eggs and fried bacon—homicide in an Irish

stew—robbery and house-breaking in a basin of mutton-broth—and an

aggravated assault in a pork sausage. Upon this noble and statesmanlike

theory Sir Robert has based a bill which, when it becomes the law of the

land, will, we feel assured, tend effectually to keep the rebellious

stomachs of the people in a state of wholesome depletion. And as we now

punish those offenders who break the Queen’s peace, we shall, in like

manner, then inflict the law upon the hungry scoundrels who dare to

break the Queen’s Fast.

We have been enabled, through a private source, to obtain the following

authentic copy of Sir Robert’s scale of the offences under the intended

Act, with the penalty attached to each, viz.:

For penny rolls or busters Imprisonment not exceeding a week. For bread

of any kind, with cheese or butter Imprisonment for a month. For

saveloys, German sausages, and Black puddings One month's imprisonment,

with hard labour. For a slice of ham, bacon, or meat of any kind

Imprisonment for three months, and exercise on the treadmill. For a

hearty dinner on beef and pudding Transportation for seven years. For

do. with a pot of home-brewed ale. Transportation for life. As these

offences apply only to those who have no right to eat, the wealthy and

respectable portion of society need be under no apprehension that they

will be exposed to any inconvenience by the operation of the new law.

NOBODY CARES AND* WELLINGTON has justified his claim to the sobriquet of

‘the iron Duke’ by the manner in which he treated the deputation from

Paisley. His Grace excused himself from listening to the tale of misery

which several gentlemen had travelled 500 miles to narrate to him, on

the plea that he was not a Minister of the Crown. Yet we have a right to

presume that the Queen prorogued Parliament upon his Grace’s

recommendation, so if he be not one of Peel’s Cabinet what is he? We

suppose

A man who is all nose. * NOBODY NOSE.

HINTS HOW TO ENJOY AN OMNIBUS. On getting in, care neither for toes or

knees of the passengers; but drive your way up to the top, steadying

yourself by the shoulders, chests, or even faces of those seated.

Seat yourself with a jerk, pushing against one neighbour, and thrusting

your elbow into the side of the other. You will thus get plenty of room.

If possible, enter with a stick or umbrella, pointed at full length; so

that any sudden move of the “bus” may thrust it into some one’s stomach.

It will make you feared.

When seated, occupy, if possible, the room of two, and revenge the

treatment you have received on entering, by throwing every opposition in

the way of a new-comer, especially if it be a woman with a child in her

arms. It is a good plan to rest firmly on your umbrella, with your arms

at right angles.

Open or shut windows as it suits you; men with colds, or women with

toothaches, have no business in omnibuses. If they don’t like it, they

can get out; no one forces them to ride.

Young bucks may stare any decent woman out of countenance, put their

legs up along the seats, and if going out to dinner, wipe the mud off

their boots on the seats. They are only plush.

If middle-aged gentlemen are musical or political, they can dislocate a

tune in something between a bark and a grumble, or endeavour to provoke

an argument by declaring very loudly that Lord R—— or the Duke “is a

thorough scoundrel,” according to their opinion of public affairs. If

this don’t take, they can keep up a perpetual squabble with the

conductor, which will show they think themselves of some importance.

Ladies wishing to be agreeable can bring lap dogs, large paper parcels,

and children, to whom an omnibus is a ship, though you wish you were out

of their reach.

Conductors should particularly aim to take up laundresses returning with

a large family washing, bakers and butchers in their working jackets,

and, if a wet day, should be particular not to pull up to the pathway.

For want of space, the following brevities must suffice:—Never say where

you wish to stop until after you have passed the place, and then pull

them up with a sudden jerk. Keep your money in your waistcoat-pocket,

and button your under and upper coat completely, and never attempt to

get at it until the door is opened, and then let it be nothing under a

five-shilling piece. Never ask any one to speak to the conductor for

you, but hit or poke him with your umbrella or stick, or rap his hand as

it rests on the door. He puts it there on purpose. Always stop the wrong

omnibus, and ask if the Paddington goes to Walworth, and the Kennington

to Whitechapel: you are not obliged to read all the rigmarole they paint

on the outside. Finally, consider an omnibus as a carriage, a bed, a

public-house, a place of amusement, or a boxing-ring, where you may

ride, sleep, smoke, chaff, or quarrel, as it may suit you.

PETER THE GREAT (FOOL?) The following colloquy occurred between a

candidate for suicidal fame and the City’s Peter Laureate:—

“So, sir, you tried to hang yourself, did you?”

“In course I did, or I should not have put my head in the noose.”

“You had no business to do so.”

“I did it for my pleasure, not for business.”

“I’ll let you see, sir, you shan’t do it either for fun or earnest.”

“Are you a Tory, Sir Peter?”

“A Tory, sir! No, sir; I’m a magistrate.”

“Ah, that’s why you interfere; you must be a low Rad, or you wouldn’t

prevent a man from

A man holds a paddle up to a woman. DOING WHAT HE LIKES WITH HIS HONE.”

THE WISE MAN OF THE EAST. SIR PETER LAURIE begs Punch to inform him,

which of Arabia’s Children is alluded to in Moore’s beautiful ballad,

“Farewell to thee, Araby’s daughter.”

He presumes it is Miss Elizabeth, commonly called Bess-Arabia.

[pg 251] SONGS OF THE SEEDY.—No. VII. I love the night with its mantle

dark,

That hangs like a cloak on the face of the sky;

Oh what to me is the song of the lark?

Give me the owl; and I’ll tell you why.

It is that at night I can walk abroad,

Which I may not do in the garish day,

Without being met in the streets, and bored

By some cursed dun, that I cannot pay.

No! no! night let it ever be:

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 1, Complete · 第 16 / 18 章