CHAPTER I. The Letter J formed by a dog sitting up in begging position

Produced by Syamanta Saikia, Jon Ingram, Barbara Tozier and the PG

Online Distributed Proofreading Team at https://www.pgdp.net

Files redesigned by David Widger converting original external links

to internal links.

[pg i] PUNCH or the London Charivari, with a vignette of PUNCH. VOLUME

THE FIRST. [pg iii] A group of masked players surround PUNCH. A banner

reads INTRODUCTION. A letter T is hoisted in a shipyard. his Guffawgraph

is intended to form a refuge for destitute wit—an asylum for the

thousands of orphan jokes—the superannuated Joe Millers—the millions of

perishing puns, which are now wandering about without so much as a shelf

to rest upon! It is also devoted to the emancipation of the JEW

d’esprits all over the world, and the naturalization of those alien

JONATHANS, whose adherence to the truth has forced them to emigrate from

their native land.

PUNCH has the honour of making his appearance every SATURDAY, and

continues, from week to week, to offer to the world all the fun to be

found in his own and the following heads:

POLITICS. “PUNCH” has no party prejudices—he is conservative in his

opposition to Fantoccini and political puppets, but a progressive whig

in his love of small change.

FASHIONS. This department is conducted by Mrs. J. Punch, whose extensive

acquaintance with the élite of the areas enables her to furnish the

earliest information of the movements of the Fashionable World.

POLICE. This portion of the work is under the direction of an

experienced nobleman—a regular attendant at the various offices—who from

a strong attachment to “PUNCH,” is frequently in a position to supply

exclusive reports.

[pg iv] REVIEWS. To render this branch of the periodical as perfect as

possible, arrangements have been made to secure the critical assistance

of John Ketch, Esq., who, from the mildness of the law, and the

congenial character of modern literature with his early associations,

has been induced to undertake its execution.

FINE ARTS. Anxious to do justice to native talent, the criticisms upon

Painting, Sculpture, &c., are confided to one of the most popular

artists of the day—“Punch’s” own immortal scene-painter.

MUSIC AND THE DRAMA. These are amongst the most prominent features of

the work. The Musical Notices are written by the gentleman who plays the

mouth-organ, assisted by the professors of the drum and cymbals. “Punch”

himself does the Drama.

SPORTING. A Prophet is engaged! He foretells not only the winners of

each race, but also the “VATES” and colours of the riders.

THE FACETIÆ Are contributed by the members of the following learned

bodies:—

THE COURT OF COMMON COUNCIL AND THE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY:—THE TEMPERANCE

ASSOCIATION AND THE WATERPROOFING COMPANY:—THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND

THE HIGHGATE CEMETERY:—THE DRAMATIC AUTHORS’ AND THE MENDICITY

SOCIETIES:—THE BEEFSTEAK CLUB AND THE ANTI-DRY-ROT COMPANY.

Together with original, humorous, and satirical articles in verse and

prose, from all the

Dogs dressed in gentlemen's clothing. FUNNY DOGS WITH COMIC TALES.

[pg v] INTRODUCTION. VOLUME I.—JULY TO DECEMBER, 1841. POLITICAL

SUMMARY. Early in the month of July, 1841, a small handbill was freely

distributed by the newsmen of London, and created considerable amusement

and inquiry. That handbill now stands as the INTRODUCTION to this, the

first Volume of Punch, and was employed to announce the advent of a

publication which has sustained for nearly twenty years a popularity

unsurpassed in the history of periodical literature. Punch and the

Elections were the only matters which occupied the public mind on July

17, 1842. The Whigs had been defeated in many places where hitherto they

had been the popular party, and it was quite evident that the Meeting of

Parliament would terminate their lease of Office. [Street Politics.] The

House met on the 19th of August, and unanimously elected MR. SHAW

LEFEVRE to be Speaker. The address on the QUEEN’S Speech was moved by

MR. MARK PHILLIPS, and seconded by MR. DUNDAS. MR. J.S. WORTLEY moved an

amendment, negativing the confidence of the House in the Ministry, and

the debate continued to occupy Parliament for four nights, when the

Opposition obtained a majority of 91 against the Ministers. Amongst

those who spoke against the Government, and directly in favour of SIR

ROBERT PEEL, was MR. DISRAELI. In his speech he accused the Whigs of

seeking to retain power in opposition to the wishes of the country, and

of profaning the name of the QUEEN at their elections, as if she had

been a second candidate at some petty poll, and considered that they

should blush for the position in which they had placed their Sovereign.

MR. BERNAL, Jun., retorted upon MR. DISRAELI for inveighing against the

Whigs, with whom he had formerly been associated. SIR ROBERT PEEL, in a

speech of great eloquence, condemned the inactivity and feebleness of

the existing Government, and promised that, should he displace it, and

take office, it should be by walking in the open light, and in the

direct paths of the constitution. He would only accept power upon his

conception of public duty, and would resign the moment he was satisfied

he was unsupported by the confidence of the people, and not continue to

hold place when the voice of the country was against him. [Hercules

tearing Theseus from the Rock to which he had grown.] LORD JOHN defended

the acts of the Ministry, and denied that they had been guilty of

harshness to the poor by the New Poor Law, or enemies of the Church by

reducing “the ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY to the miserable pittance of

£15,000 a year, cutting down the BISHOP OF LONDON to no more than

£10,000 a year, and the BISHOP OF DURHAM to the wretched stipend of

£8,000 a year!” He twitted PEEL for his reticence upon the Corn Laws,

and denounced the possibility of a sliding scale of duties upon corn. He

concluded by saying, “I am convinced that, if this country be governed

by enlarged and liberal counsels, its power and might will spread and

increase, and its influence become greater and greater; liberal

principles will prevail, civilisation will be spread to all parts of the

globe, and you will bless millions by your acts and mankind by your

union.” Loud and continued cheering followed this speech, but on

division the majority was against the Ministers. When the House met to

recommend the report on the amended Address, MR. SHARMAN CRAWFORD moved

another amendment, to the effect that the distress of the people

referred to in the QUEEN’S Speech was mainly attributable to the non-

representation of the working classes in Parliament. He did not advocate

universal suffrage, but one which would give a fair representation of

the people. From the want of this arose unjust wars, unjust legislation,

unjust monopoly, of which the existing Corn Laws were the most grievous

instance. There was no danger in confiding the suffrage to the working

classes, who had a vital interest in the public prosperity, and had

evinced the truest zeal for freedom.

The amendment was negatived by 283 to 39.

At the next meeting of the House LORD MARCUS HILL read the Answer to the

Address, in which the QUEEN declared that “ever anxious to listen to the

advice of Parliament, she would take immediate measures for the

formation of a new Administration.” [Punch and Peel.] LORD MELBOURNE, in

the House of Lords, announced on the 30th of August that he and his

colleagues only held office until their successors were appointed. [Last

Pinch.] The House received the announcement in perfect silence, and

adjourned immediately afterwards. On the same [pg vi]night, in the House

of Commons, LORD JOHN RUSSELL made a similar announcement, and briefly

defended the course he and his colleagues had taken, and in reply to

some complimentary remarks from LORD STANLEY, approving of LORD JOHN’S

great zeal, talent, and perseverance, denied that the Crown was

answerable for any of the propositions contained in the Speech, which

were the result of the advice of HER MAJESTY’S Ministers, and for which

her Ministers alone were responsible. This declaration was necessary in

consequence of the accusation of the Conservatives, that the Ministry

had made an unfair use of the QUEEN’S name in and out of Parliament.

[Trimming a Whig.] The new Ministry [The Letter of Introduction] was

formed as follows:—

THE CABINET. THE DUKE OF WELLINGTON (without office); First Lord of the

Treasury, SIR R. PEEL; Lord Chancellor, LORD LYNDHUHST; Chancellor of

the Exchequer, RIGHT HON. H. GOULBURN; President of the Council, LORD

WHARNCLIFFE; Privy Seal, DUKE OF BUCKINGHAM; Home Secretary, SIR JAMES

GRAHAM; Foreign Secretary, EARL OF ABERDEEN; Colonial Secretary, LORD

STANLEY; First Lord of the Admiralty, EARL OF HADDINGTON; President of

the Board of Control, LORD ELLENBOROUGH; President of the Board of

Trade, EARL OF RIPON; Secretary at War, SIR H. HARDINGE; Treasurer of

the Navy and Paymaster of the Forces, SIR E. KNATCHBULL.

NOT IN THE CABINET. Postmaster-General, LORD LOWTHER; Chancellor of the

Duchy of Lancaster, LORD G. SOMERSET; Woods and Forests, EARL OF

LINCOLN; Master-General of the Ordnance, SIR G. MURRAY; Vice-President

of the Board of Trade and Master of the Mint, W.E. GLADSTONE; Secretary

of the Admiralty, HON. SYDNEY HERBERT; Joint Secretaries of the

Treasury, SIR G. CLERK and SIR T. FREMANTLE; Secretaries of the Board of

Control, HON. W. BARING and J. EMERSON TENNENT; Home Under-Secretary,

HON. C.M. SUTTON; Foreign Under-Secretary, LORD CANNING; Colonial Under-

Secretary, G.W. HOPE; Lords of the Treasury, ALEXANDER PRINGLE, H.

BARING, J. YOUNG, and J. MILNES GASKELL; Lords of the Admiralty, SIR G.

COCKBURN, ADMIRAL SIR W. GAGE, SIR G. SEYMOUR, HON. CAPTAIN GORDON, HON.

H.L. COREY; Store-keeper of the Ordnance, J.R. BONHAM; Clerk of the

Ordnance, CAPTAIN BOLDERO; Surveyor-General of the Ordnance, COLONEL

JONATHAN PEEL; Attorney-General, SIR F. POLLOCK; Solicitor-General, SIR

W. FOLLETT; Judge-Advocate, DR. NICHOLL; Governor-General of Canada, SIR

C. BAGOT; Lord Advocate of Scotland, SIR W. RAE.

IRELAND. Lord Lieutenant, EARL DE GREY; Lord Chancellor, SIR E. SUGDEN;

Chief Secretary, LORD ELIOT; Attorney-General, MR. BLACKBURNE, Q.C.;

Solicitor-General, SERJEANT JACKSON.

QUEEN’S HOUSEHOLD. Lord Chamberlain, EARL DELAWARR; Lord Steward, EARL

OF LIVERPOOL; Master of the Horse, EARL OF JERSEY; Master of the

Buckhounds, EARL OF ROSSLYN; Captain of the Yeomen of the Guard, MARQUIS

OF LOTHIAN; Captain of the Gentlemen Pensioners, LORD FORESTER; Vice-

Chamberlain, LORD ERNEST BRUCE; Treasurer of the Household, EARL JERMYN;

Controller of the Household, HON. D. DAMER; Lords in Waiting, LORD

ABOYNE, LORD RIVERS, LORD HARDWICKE, LORD BYRON, EARL OF WARWICK,

VISCOUNT SYDNEY, EARL OF MORTON, and MARQUIS OF ORMONDE; Groom in

Waiting, CAPTAIN MEYNELL; Mistress of the Robes, DUCHESS OF BUCCLEUCH;

Ladies of the Bedchamber, MARCHIONESS CAMDEN, LADY LYTTELTON, LADY

PORTMAN, LADY BARHAM, and COUNTESS OF CHARLEMONT.

PRINCE ALBERT’S HOUSEHOLD. Groom of the Stole, MARQUIS OF EXETER;

Sergeant-at-Arms, COLONEL PERCEVAL; Clerk Marshal, LORD C. WELLESLEY.

The members of the new Government were re-elected without an exception,

and the House of Commons met again on September 16. SIR ROBERT PEEL made

a statement to the House, in which he merely intimated that he should

adopt the Estimates [Playing the Knave] of his predecessors, and

continue the existing Poor-Law and its Establishment to the 31st of July

following. He declined to announce his own financial measures until the

next Session, and continued in this determination unmoved by the

speeches of LORD JOHN RUSSELL, LORD PALMERSTON, and other Members of the

Opposition. MR. FIELDEN moved that no supplies be granted until after an

inquiry into the distress of the country; but the motion was negatived

by a large majority. Continual reference was made by MR. COBDEN, MR.

VILLIERS, and others to the strong desire of the people for a Repeal of

the Corn Laws, and which had been loudly expressed out of the House for

more than four years. MR. BUSFIELD FERRAND denied the necessity for any

alteration, and accused the manufacturers of fomenting the agitation for

their own selfish ends, and to increase their power of reducing the

wages of the already starving workmen. MR. MARK PHILLIPS, in a capital

speech, disproved all MR. FERRAND’S statements. SIR ROBERT PEEL brought

in a Bill to continue the Poor Law Commission for six months, and MR.

FIELDER’S Amendment [The Well Dressed and the Well to Do] to reject it

was negatived by 183 to 18. LORD MELBOURNE attacked, in the House of

Lords, the Ministerial plan of finance, and their silence as to the

future [Mr. Sancho Bull and his State Physician], and invited the DUKE

OF WELLINGTON to bring forward a measure for an alteration of the Corn

Laws, promising him a full House if he would do so. The Duke declined

the invitation, as he never announced an intention which he did not

entertain, and he had not considered the operation of the Corn Laws

sufficiently to bring forward a scheme for the alteration of them. This

statement led on a subsequent evening to an intimation from the DUKE OF

WELLINGTON, in reply to the EARL OF RADNOR, that a consideration of the

Corn Laws was only declined “at the present time.” On the 7th of October

Parliament was prorogued until November 11th, the Lords Commissioners

being the LORD CHANCELLOR, the DUKE OF WELLINGTON, the DUKE OF

BUCKINGHAM, the EARL OF SHAFTESBURY, and LORD WHARNCLIFFE.

[pg vii] NOTES. Hume’s Terminology.—Defeat at Leeds.

W. BECKETT 2076 W. ALDAM 2043 T. HUME 2033 VISCOUNT JOCELYN 1926 Lessons

in Punmanship.—THOMAS HOOD, the distinguished Poet and Wit, died May 3,

1845.

Court Circular.—MASTER JONES, better known as the “Boy JONES,” was a

sweep who obtained admission on more than one occasion to Buckingham

Palace in a very mysterious manner. He gave great trouble to the

authorities, and was at length sent into the Royal Navy.

Mrs. Lilly was the nurse of the PRINCESS ROYAL.

Mr. Moreton Dyer, a stipendiary Magistrate, removed from the Commons on

a charge of bribing electors.

A Public Conveyance.—THE MARQUIS OF WATERFORD was then a man about town,

and frequently before the public in connection with some extravagance.

“The Black-Balled Of The United Service” refers to proceedings connected

with the EARL OF CARDIGAN. Exception had been taken to the introduction

of black bottles at the mess-table at Brighton, and a duel was

subsequently fought by LORD CARDIGAN and MR. HARVEY TUCKETT.

An Ode.—Kilpack’s Divan, now the American Bowling Alley, in King Street,

Covent Garden, continues to be the resort of minor celebrities. As the

club was a private one, we do not feel justified in more plainly

indicating the members referred to as the “jocal nine.”

Mrs. H.—MRS. HONEY, a very charming actress.

Court Circular.—DEAF BURKE was a pugilist who occasionally exhibited

himself as “the Grecian Statues,” and upon one occasion attempted a

reading from SHAKSPEARE. As he was very ignorant, and could neither read

nor write, the effect was extremely ridiculous, and helped to give the

man a notoriety.

The Harp, a tavern near Drury Lane, was a favourite resort of the Elder

KEAN, and in 1841 had a club-room divided into four wards: Gin Ward,

Poverty Ward, Insanity Ward, and Suicide Ward, the walls of which were

appropriately illustrated, and by no mean hand. The others named (with

the exception of PADDY GREEN) were pugilists.

An an-tea Anacreontic.—RUNDEL was the head of a large Jeweller’s firm on

Ludgate Hill.

Monsieur Jullien was the first successful promoter of cheap concerts in

England. He was a clever conductor, and affected the mountebank. He was

a very honourable man, and hastened his death by over-exertion to meet

his liabilities. He died 1860.

Punch and Peel.—SIR ROBERT PEEL stipulated, on taking office, for an

entire change of the Ladies of the Bedchamber.

William Farren, the celebrated actor of Old Men.

Colonel Sibthorp was M.P. for Lincoln, and more distinguished by his

benevolence to his constituency than his merits as a senator. He was

very amusing.

Fashionable Movements.—COUNT D’ORSAY, an elegant, accomplished, and

kind-hearted Frenchman, was a leader of Fashion, long resident in

England. He was the friend and adviser of Louis NAPOLEON during his

exile in this country. COUNT D’ORSAY died in Paris.

Jobbing Patriots.—MR. GEORGE ROBINS was an auctioneer in Covent Garden,

and celebrated for the extravagant imagery of his advertisements. His

successors have offices in Bond Street.

Shocking Want of Sympathy.—SIR P. LAURIE, a very active City magnate,

continually engaged in “putting down” suicide, poverty, &c.

Sir F. Burdett, long the Radical member for Westminster. His political

perversion took every one by surprise.

New Stuffing for the Speaker’s Chair.—MR. PETER BORTHWICK had been an

actor in the Provinces.

Inquest.—The Eagle Tavern, City Road, was built by MR. ROUSE—“Bravo,

ROUSE!” as he was called.

Lady Morgan, the Authoress of The Wild Irish Girl, and many other

popular works, died 1860.

The Tory Table d’Hote.—“BILLY” HOLMES was whipper-in to the

Conservatives in the House of Commons.

The Legal Eccalobeion.—BARON CAMPBELL had been appointed Chancellor of

Ireland a few days before the Dissolution (1841). He is now Lord

Chancellor of England (1861). The Eccalobeion was an apparatus for

hatching birds by steam, but was too costly to be successful

commercially.

The State Doctor.—SIR R. PEEL, in his speech at Tamworth, had called

himself “the State Doctor,” who would not attempt to prescribe until

regularly called in.

Curious Coincidence.—Certain gentlemen, feeling themselves aggrieved and

unfairly treated by the managers of the London Theatres, had for some

time been abusing the more fortunate dramatists, whose pieces had found

acceptance with the public, until at last they resolved upon the course

here set forth, and commented upon.

Animal Magnetism.—LORDS MELBOURNE, RUSSELL, and MORPETH, and MR.

LABOUCHERE at the window, SIR R. PEEL and the DUKE OF WELLINGTON

mesmerising the Lion.

Mr. Muntz, M.P. for Birmingham, wore a very large beard, and in 1841

such hirsute adornments were very uncommon.

General Satisfaction.—The Morning Herald had acquired the sobriquet of

“My Grandmother.”

Done Again.—MR. DUNN, a barrister, subjected Miss BURDETT COUTTS to a

series of annoyances which ultimately led to legal proceedings, and to

MR. DUNN’S imprisonment.

Bernard Cavanagh was an impostor who pretended he could live for many

weeks without food. He attracted much attention at the time, and was

ultimately detected concealing [pg viii]a cold sausage, when he

confessed his imposture, and was imprisoned by the MAYOR OF READING.

Taking The Hodds.—“Holy Land,” the cant name for a part of St. Giles’s,

now destroyed. BANKS owned a public-house frequented by thieves of both

sexes, and whom he managed to keep under perfect control. A visit to

“Stunning JOE BANKS” was thought a fast thing in 1841.

Feargus O’Connor, M.P. for Nottingham, was the leader of the Chartists

and projector of the Land Scheme for securing votes to the masses. The

project failed. MR. O’CONNOR was a political enthusiast, ultimately

became insane, and died in an Asylum.

Die Hexen am Rhein.—MR. FREDERICK YATES was an admirable actor, and the

proprietor and manager of the favourite “little Adelphi” Theatre, in the

Strand.

Prospectus.—We believe this article suggested the existing Accident

Assurance Company.

Mr. Silk Buckingham was a voluminous writer and founder of the British

and Foreign Institute, in George Street, Hanover Square.

Parliamentary Masons.—The masons employed in building the New Houses of

Parliament struck for higher wages.

The Improvident.—LORD MELBOURNE and MR. LABOUCHERE, MR. D. O’CONNELL,

LORDS RUSSELL and MORPETH.

Promenade Concerts.—M. MUSARD was the originator in Paris of this class

of amusement. Their popularity induced an imitation in England by M.

JULLIEN.

To Benevolent and Humane Jokers.—TOM COOKE was the leader and composer

at the Theatres Royal, and a remarkable performer on a penny trumpet. He

occasionally made use of this toy in his pantomime introductions. He was

also a very “funny” fellow.

Coming Events Cast their Shadows before.—SIR JAMES CLARKE, Accoucheur to

the QUEEN.

Savory Con. by Cox.—COX AND SAVORY, advertising silversmiths and

watchmakers.

New Parliamentary Masons.—In the foreground COL. SIBTHORP, SIR R. PEEL,

and MR. O’CONNELL. At the back SIR JAMES GRAHAM, DUKE OF WELLINGTON, and

LORD STANLEY.

“Rob Me the Exchequer, Hal.”—A person of the name of SMITH forged a

great amount of Exchequer Bills at this time.

The Fire at the Tower on October 31, 1841. Immense damage was done to

the building, and a great quantity of arms were destroyed. (See Annual

Register.)

Sir Robert Macaire.—Robert Macaire was a French felonious drama made

famous by the admirable acting of LEMAITRE, and, from some supposed

allusion to LOUIS PHILIPPE, MACAIRE’S friend and scapegoat always

appears with a large umbrella.

The O’Connell Papers.—D. O’CONNELL was elected Lord Mayor of Dublin,

1841.

Harmer Virumque Cano.—ALDERMAN HARMER, Proprietor of the Weekly

Dispatch, and for that and other reasons, was not elected Lord Mayor.

Cutting at the Root of the Evil.—MR. HOBLER was for many years Principal

Clerk to the Magistrates at the Mansion House.

Olivia’s (Lord Brougham’s) Return to her Friends.—LORDS RUSSELL,

MELBOURNE, MORPETH, D. O’CONNELL, CORDEN, and LABOUCHERE.

A Barrow Knight.—SIR VINCENT COTTON was a well-known four-in-hand whip,

and for some little time drove a coach to Brighton. SIR WYNDHAM

ANSTRUTHER (WHEEL OF FORTUNE) was another four-in-hand celebrity.

Seeing Nothing.—DANIEL WHITTLE HARVEY.

Barber-ous Announcement.—MR. TANNER’S shop was part of one of the side

arches of Temple Bar, and so reached from that obstruction to Shire

Lane, which adjoins it on the City side.

Fashionable Intelligence.—The PADDY GREEN so frequently referred to was

a popular singer and an excellent tempered man. He was unfairly treated

by Punch at this time, because really unknown to the writer. MR. JOHN

GREEN is now the well known and much respected host and proprietor of

Evans’s Hotel, Covent Garden.

Kings and Carpenters.—DON LEON, shot for insurrection in favour of the

Ex-Regent CHRISTINA.

Cupid out of Place.—LORD PALMERSTON, from his very engaging manner, was

long known as “Cupid.”

Jack Cutting his Name on the Beam.—LORD JOHN RUSSELL, after GEORGE

CRUIKSHANK’S etching of Jack Sheppard.

Sibthorp’s Con. Corner.—BRYANT was publisher of Punch, 1841.

PUNCH kicks the world. Punch, or the London Charivari for the week

ending July 17, 1841 October 9, 1841 July 24, 1841 October 16, 1841 July

31, 1841 October 23, 1841 August 7, 1841 October 30, 1841 August 14,

1841 November 6, 1841 August 21, 1841 November 13, 1841 August 28, 1841

November 20, 1841 September 5, 1841 November 27, 1841 September 12, 1841

December 4, 1841 September 18, 1841 December 11, 1841 September 25, 1841

December 18, 1841 October 2, 1841 December 25, 1841 INDEX. A man

sweeping, forming the letter A A Barrister’s Card, 33 A Bitter

Draught—Jonathanisms, 47 A Bower of Bliss in Stangate, 120 A

Barrowknight, 226 A Card, 106 A Chapter on Politics, 216 A Classical

Inscription for a Cigar-case, 29 A Chapter on Boots, 16 A Con., 15, 23,

29, 48, 209, 221, 241, 252 A Constant Pair, 76 A Count and his

Schneider, 76 A Curious Error, 155 A Cruel Disappointment, 81 Active

Benevolence, 231 A Cut by Sir Peter, 273 A Dab for Laurie, 251 A Deer

Bargain, 275 A Dictionary for the Ladies, 264 A Dose of Castor, 218 A

Dress Rehearsal, 59 Advantages of Animal Magnetism, 47 Advantages of

Style, 69 Advice Gratis, 74 A Familiar Epistle from John Stump, Esq.,

237 A Fair Offer, 33 A Few more veritable Jonathans, 24 Affairs in

China, 143 A Great Card, 143 A Hint for Politicians, 101 A Hint to the

new Lord Chamberlain, 83 A Hint to the Ugly, 48 Alarming Destitution, 52

Alarming Prospects of the Country, 218 A Legend of the Tower (not

London), 220 A Mail Due, 173 A Manual of Dénouements, 145 A Matter of

Course, 83 A Matter of Taste, 52 A Mayor’s Nest, 184 A Meeting of Old

Acquaintances, 252 A Mesmeric Advertisement, 122 A Moving Scene, 35 A

Modern Method of forming a New Budget, 13 An Alligator Chairman, 10 An

Alarming Strike, 122 An-Tea Anacreontic, 4, 13, 40, 53 An Atrocious Pun,

98 An Appropriate Name, 97 An Advertisement, 85 A Natural Deduction, 37

A Natural Inference, 52 An Appropriate Gift, 173 An Acute Angle, 73 An

Extract from the Spectator, 202 An Extensive Sacrifice, 129 An Exclusive

Appointment, 87 A New Theory of Pockets, 113 A New Milky Way, 228 A New

Conjuring Company, 129 A New Version of Belshazzar’s Feast, 66 A New

Wine, 257 An Imminent Breach, 82 An Inquiry from Deaf Burke, Esq., 58

Animal Magnetism, 28 An important Discovery, 64 Announcement

Extraordinary, 274 An Ode picked up in the Divan, 11 A Novel

Entertainment, 110 An Undivided Moiety, 205 A Party of Medallers, 15 A

Pair of Ducks, 179 A Pair of Fools, 76 A Pæan for Dan, 208 A Perfect

Vacuum Proved, 252 A Pleasant Assurance, 149 A Private Box, 93 A Pro and

Con, 101 A Prudent Change, 34 A Prudent Reason, 125 A Public

Convenience, 6 A “Punch” Testimonial, 227 A Pun from the Row, 83 A

Quarter-day Cogitation, 5 “Are ye sure the News is True?” 218 Artistic

Execution, 83 Arrived at Last, 173 “A Ring! a Ring!!” 145 American

Congress, 172 A Royal Duck, 134 A Scandalous Report, 194 A Short

Treatise of Dramatic Casualties, 131 A Singular Inadvertence, 90 A Slap

at John Chinaman’s Chops, 180 A Slight Contrast, 256 A Spoke in

Stanley’s Wheel, 52 A Spoon Case, 251 Assertion of the Unintelligible,

111 A Strong Resemblance, 34 A Suggestion, 182 A Thing unfit to

a(p)pear, 64 A Thorough Draught, 207 A Try-Angle, 170 A Trifle from

Little Tommy, 81 Awful Accident, 69, 81 A Wood-cut, 23 Authentic, 40 A

Voice from the Area, 100 A woman leans against a letter B. Bad either

Way, 76 Ballads of the Briefless, 273 Barber-ous Announcement, 228

Bartholomew Fair Show-Folks, 88 Beginning Early, 75 Bernard Cavanagh,

124 Birth of the Prince of Wales, 205 Black and White, 52 “Blow Gentle

Breeze,” 193 Brandy and Waterford (a Go!), 226 Breach of Privilege, 29

Buffoon’s Natural History, 256 Bunks’s Discoveries in the Thames, 129

Burke’s Heraldry, 182 A seated man smokes and forms a letter C Calumny

Refuted, 52 Capital Illustration, 88 Cause and Effect, 202, 238 Caution

to Gourmands, 81 Caution to Sportsmen, 97 Certainly not,—“Better Late

than Never,” 255 Characteristic Correspondence, 17 Charles Kean’s

“Cheek”, 53 Chaunt to Old Father Time, 23 Chelsea, 71

Christianity.—Price Fifteen Shillings, 150 Civilization, 27 Clar’ de

Kitchen, 15 Comic Credentials, 40 Coming Events cast their Shadows

before, 177 Commentary on the Elections, 9 Commercial Intelligence, 1

Cons.—A Query, 54 Cons, by O’Connell, 167 Con. by Theodore Hook, 81

Cons. by Our Own Colonel, 155 Conundrums by Col. Sibthorp, 21 Con. by

Sibthorp and Stultz, 245 Con. by an X M.P., 29 Cons, worth Conning, 227

Conundrum by the Lord Mayor, 216 Concerts d’Eté, 96 Condensed

Parliamentary Report, 133 Continuations from China, 157 Conversation

between Two Hackney-coach Horses, 5 Coombe’s Lungs and Learning, 161

Correspondence, 35 Correspondence Extraordinary, 61 Coventry’s Wise

Precaution, 157 Court Circular, 5, 13 Crimes of Eating, 250 Cross

Readings, 23 Cupid’s Bow, 255 Curious Ambiguity, 144 Curious

Coincidence, 65, 87 Curious Synonymes, 173 Curiosity Hunters, 137

Custom-House Sale, 145 Cutting at the Root of the Evil, 218 Cutting it

rather Short, 251 A man walks through a letter D Decidedly Unpleasant,

87 Devilled Drumsticks, 226 Dialogue. George Canning and Sir Robert

Peel, 111 Diary of a Lord Mayor, 26 Discovery of Valuable Jewels, 238

Distress of the Country, 215 Doctor Peel taking time to Consult, 126

Doing the State some Service, 206 Domestic Economy, 183 Done again, 110

Draw it Gently, 255 Dyer Ignorance, 135 A man doffs his hat, holds a bag

in his hand, and has a string attached. He forms a letter E.

Eccentricities of the Minor Drama, 137 Ecclesiastical Transportation, 21

Elegant Phrases, 261 Eligible Investments! 209 Encouragement of Native

Talent, 114 Enjoyment, 108 English and American Produce, 61 Epigrams,

14, 21, 24, 61, 89, 97, 173, 198 Epitaph on a Candle, 172 Errata in the

“Times,” 141 Exclusive Interference, 28 Express from America, 185

Express from Windsor, 134 Extra Fashionable News, 90 Extraordinary

Assize Intelligence, 52 Extraordinary Operation, 52 A man carries

something on a shoulder and forms a letter F False Alarm, 206 Fancied

Fair, 95 Fashions, 83, 257, 270 Fashionable Arrivals, 21, 74 Fashionable

Intelligence, 47, 130, 205, 221, 232, 257 Fashionable Movements, 255

Fearful State of London, 99 Fine Arts, 9, 33, 108, 112 Fine Arts

External Exhibitions, 65 Fire! Fire! 173 Fire at the Adelphi Theatre,

249 Fish Sauce, 118 Foreign Affairs, 42, 95 French Living, 232 From the

London Gazette, Nov. 16, 232 A man leans against a letter G Galvanism

Outdone, 101 General Satisfaction, 85 Geology of Society, 157 “Go along,

Bob,” 155 Grant’s Meditations among the Coffee-cup, 263 Gravesend—from

our own Correspondent, 121 Great Annual Michaelmas Jubilee, 135 Two men

shaking hands form a letter H (H)all is lost now! 123 “Habit is second

Nature,” 147 Hamlet’s Soliloquy by a XX Teetotaller, 190 Happy Land, 173

Hard and Fast, 203 Hard to Remember, 209 Harmer Virumque Cano, 215 Heavy

Lightness, 83 High Life Below Stairs, 134 Hints on Popping the Question,

233 Hints to New Members, 82 Hints on Melo-dramatic Music, 17 Hints how

to enjoy an Omnibus, 250 His Turn now, 237 Hitting the Right Nail on the

Head, 52 Hostilities in Private Life, 178 Humane Suggestion, 111 Hume’s

Terminology, 1 Hume’s Day-school, 11 Hume Leeds—Wakley Follows, 180

Humfery Cheat-’em, 45 PUNCH in his theatre forms a letter I “I Do Adjure

you, Answer me!” 154 If I had a Thousand a Year, 63 Imperial

Parliament—The Queen’s Speech, 78 Important News from China, 74

Important Intelligence, 269 Important Invention, 130 Inauguration of the

Image of Shakspere, 106 Injured Innocence, 54 Inquest, 41 Inquest

Extraordinary, 87 Inquest Extraordinary on a Coroner, 155 Inquest—not

Extraordinary, 78 Irish Intelligence.—Awful State of the Country, 220

Irish Particular, 52 It was before I married, 57 A begging dog forms a

letter J Jocky Jason, 57 Joe Hume’s Forthcoming Work, 221 Joe

Hum(e)anity, 123 Jonathans, 24, 37 A woman and her backwards umbrella

form a letter K Keeping it dark, 189 Kidnapping Extraordinary, 179 Kings

and Carpenters, 234 People under a tree building a canoe form a letter L

Labours of the British Association, 57 Labours of the Session, 159 Lady

Morgan’s Little One, 49 Lam(b)entations, 71 Land Sharks and Sea Gulls,

142 Last New Sayings, 191 Laurie’s Raillery, 252 Laurie’s Essay on the

Pharmacopœia, 168 Laurie on Geography, 161 Lays of the “Beau Monde,” 141

Lays of the Lazy, 70 Legal Pugilism, 41 Lessons in Punmanship, 2 Letter

of Introduction, 90 Like Master Like Man, 154 Lines on Miss Adelaide

Kemble, 255 Looking on the Black Side of Things, 99 List of Outrages,

142 Literary Queries and Replies, 24 Lord Melbourne’s Letter-beg, 70

Lord Johnny Licking the Birse, 54 Love and Hymen, 244 Loyalty and

Insanity, 258 Linen-drapers of Ludgate, 166 List of the Premiums at the

H.S. Soc., 189 Literary Recipes, 39 Two girls on stilts form a letter M

Madame Tussaud’s, 96 Magisterial Axioms, 226 Major Beniowsky’s New Art

of Memory, 149 Making a Composition with one’s Ancestors, 135 Marriage

and Christening Extraordinary, 22 Matinée Mesmerique, 123 Matrimonial

Agency, 59 Maternal Solicitude, 70 “Matters in Fact” and “Matters in

Law,” 59 Metropolitan Improvements, 141 Michaelmas Day, 142 Modern Wat

Tylers, 26 Molar and Incisor, 136 Monsieur Jullien, 15 More Ways than

One, &c., 15 Morbid Sympathy for Criminals, 227 More Sketches of London

Life, 231 More Fashionable Intelligence, 227 Mr. Punch, Artist in

Philosophy and Fireworks, 202 Musical News (Noose), 243 “My Name’s the

Doctor,” 40 Myself, Punch, and the Keeleys, 217 Two men and a

wheelbarrow form a letter N Napoleon’s Statue at Boulogne, 81 National

Distress, 251 Native Swallows, 1 Narrative of an Awful Case of Extreme

Distress, 77 New Code of Signals, 57 News for the Syncretics, 101 New

Parliamentary Returns, 83 New Annuals and Republications, 238 News of

Extraordinary Interest, 15 New Swimming Apparatus, 99 New Works now in

the Press, 171 New Stuffing for the Speaker’s Chair, 41 Nigger

Peculiarities, 184 Nobody Cares and Nobody Nose, 250 Nothing Wonderful,

26 Nothing New, 159 “Not Exactly,” 256 Not a Step Fa(r)ther, 173 Nouveau

Manuel du Voyageur, 28 Novel Experiment—Great Screw, 82 Novel

Subscriptions, 123 Nursery Education Report, 54 Nursery Education

Report—No. 2, 62 A couple in an O-framed vignette Official Report of the

Fire at the Tower, 241 Oh! Day and Night! 132 Oh! Gemini! 228 Old

Bailey, 41 Ominous, 22 “One Good Turn deserves Another,” 218 On Dits of

the Clubs, 53 On Snuff, and the Different Ways of Taking it, 256 On the

Introduction of Pantomime into the English Language, 10 On Sir E.L.

Bulwer, Bart., 28 On the Science of Electioneering, 110 On the Key-Vive,

191 On the Popularity of Mr. Ch—s K—n, 48 Our City Article, 39, 245 Our

Foreign Relations, 118 Our Trade Report, 189 Our Weathercock, 241 Out of

School, 275 Out of Season, 98 Two men pull on a tree branch and form a

letter P Parliamentary Intentions, 90 Parliamentary Masons—Parliamentary

Pictures, 162 Peel’s Pre-existence, 198 Peel “regularly called in,” 102

Pen and Palette Portraits, 262, 274 Peter the Great (Fool?), 250

Philanthropy, Fine Writing, and Fireworks, 77 Physiology of the Lond.

Med. Student, 142, 154, 165, 177, 185, 201, 213, 225, 229, 244, 253, 265

Pictorial History of Parliament, 174 Pleasures of Hope (rather

expensive), 83 Please to remember the Fifth of November, 195 Poached

Egotism, 143 Poetry on an Improved Principle, 25 Political Naturalist’s

Library, 143 Political Euclid, 149, 166 Politics of the Outward Man, 186

Political Intelligence, 264 Poor Jack, 158 Poor John Bull, 34 Popish

Red-dress, 251 “’Possum up a Gum Tree,” 205 Pray don’t tell the

Governor, 28 Present Crops Abroad, 82 Private, 13 Proper Precaution, 222

Prospectus for a Provident Annuity Company, 81 Prospectus for a New

Hand-book of Jesters, 238 Prospectus of a New Grand Railroad Accident

and Partial Mutilation Provident Society, 159 Private Correspondence,

155 Providing for Evil Days, 107 Promenade Concerts, 168 Public Affairs

on Phrenological Principles, 57 Punch and Peel, 18 Punch and Peel—the

New Cabinet, 30 Punch and Sir John Pollen, 45 Punch and the Swiss

Giantess, 245 Punchlied—Song for Punch Drinkers, 268 Punch’s Catechism

of Geography, 214 Punch’s Commission to Inquire into the General

Distress, 170 Punch’s Correspondence, 17 Punch’s Extra Dramatic

Intelligence, 69 Punch’s Essence of Guffaw, 122 Punch’s Guide to the

Watering Places—Brighton, 145 Punch’s Histrionic Readings in

History—England, 136 Punch’s Information, 41, 58, 82, 119, 179, 261

Punch’s Lecture on Morality, 119 Punch’s Letter-Writer, 255 Punch’s

Literature, 86 Punch’s Literary Intelligence, 276 Punch’s New General

Letter-Writer, 160 Punch’s Pæan to the Princelet, 209 Punch’s Political

Economy, 191 Punch’s Random Recoll. of the House of Lords, 52 Punch’s

Review: Madame Laffarge, 189 Punch’s Stomachology, Lecture I., 232

PUNCH’S THEATRE, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 95, 107, 113, 131, 132,

144, 156, 167, 180, 192, 203, 204, 216, 239, 240, 252, 264, 276 A dog

jumps through a hoop and forms a letter Q Q.E.D., 133 Qualifications for

an M.P., 12 Queer Queries, 269 Questions by the Disowned of Nottingham,

23 A pump with a 'Temperance' banner forms a letter R Rather Ominous, 83

Rather Suicidal, 82 Reasons Ne Plus Ultra, 76, 97 Recollections of a

Trip in Mr. Hampton’s Balloon, 99 Railway Accidents, Prevention of, 165

Reconciling a Difference, 241 Recreation for the Public, 130 Reform your

Lawyer’s Bills, 197 Regularly Called in and Bowled out, 225 Rejected

Address of the Melancholy Whigs, 54 Relative Gentility, 189 Revenge is

Sweet, 23 Review, 23 “Rob me the Exchequer, Hal,” 194 Roebuck defying

the “Thunderer,” 134 Romance of a Teacup, 221, 233, 245 Root and Branch,

142 Royal Nursery Education Report, No. 3, 105 Rumball the Comedian, 41

Two whales kiss and form a letter S Sayings and Doings in the Royal

Nursery, 239 Savory Con. by Cox, 178 Schools of Design, 83, 159 Seeing

Nothing, 226 Shall Great Olympus to a Molehill Stoop? 89 Shocking want

of Sympathy, 29 Should this meet the Eye, 203 Sibthorpiana, 144

Sibthorp’s Corner, 233, 251, 267 Sibthorp on Borthwick, 172 Sibthorp on

the Corn Laws, 118 Sibthorp’s Very Best, 75 Sibthorpian Problems, 180

Signs of the Times, 253 Sir Francis Burdett’s Visit to the Tower, 197

Sir Peter Laurie, 210 Sir Robert Peel and the Queen, 93 Sir Robert Peel

(Loquitur), 155 “Slumber, my Darling,” 237 Some things to which the

Irish would not swear, 177 Something Warlike, 1 So much for Buckingham,

159 Songs for Catarrhs, 205 Songs for the Sentimental, 6, 22, 37, 49,

81, 85, 123, 143, 149, 202, 233, 252, 262, 267 Songs of the Seedy, 93,

155, 167, 179, 184, 251 Soup, à la Julien, 264 Spanish Politics, 167

Sparks from the Fire—All is not Lost, 214 Speech from the Hustings, 24

Sporting—the Knocker Hunt, 14 Sporting Face, 145 Sporting in Downing-

street, 69 Starvation Statistics for Sir Robert Peel, 267

Stenotypography, 15 Street Politics—Punch and his Stage-Manager, 6

“Stupid as a Post,” 241 Supreme Court of the High Inquisitor Punch, 40,

69 Surrey Zoological Gardens, 109 “Syllables which breathe of the Sweet

South,” 22 Syncretic Literature, 100, 112, 124 Synopsis of Voting

according to Cant, 3 Sweet Autumn Days, 153 Two Chinese men stand with

their queues out to form a letter T Taking the Hodds, 133 Taking a Sight

at the Fire, 220 Theatrical Intelligence, 107 TALES, SKETCHES, &c. A

Day-Dream at my Uncle’s, 193 A Rail-Road Novel, 2 Father O’Flynn and his

Congregation, 125 My Uncle Bucket, 64 My Friend Tom, 101 Say it was

“me,” 148 “Take Care of Him,” 268 The Barber of Stocksbawler, 161 The

Currah Cut, 76 The Gold Snuff-box, 183 The Great Creature, 169 The Heir

of Applebite, 73, 89, 97, 109, 121, 146, 171, 182, 194, 206, 219 The Man

of Habit, 191 The Omen Outwitted, 117 The Professional Singer, 4 The

Puff Papers, 230, 242, 254, 266 Tom Connor’s Dilemma, 153 The Sailor’s

Secret, 22 The Tiptoes, 133 The Wife Catchers, 34, 37, 49, 61 Theatre-

Royal Drury Lane, 47 The Above-bridge Navy, 35 The Amende Honorable, 107

The Bane and Antidote, 241 The Beauty of Brass, 111 The Boy Jones’s Log,

46 The Broth of a Boy, 269 The Battle and the Breeze, 130 The Corn Laws

and Christianity, 114 The Cheroot, 273 The Copper Captain, 267 The

Corsair; a Poem to be read on Railroads, 241 The Dinnerology of England,

78 The Destruction of the Aldermen, 215 The Desire of Pleasing, 181 The

Election of Ballinafad, 21 The Entire Animal, 12 The Explosive Box, 28

The Evil most to be Dreaded, 143 The Fastest Man, 267 The Fasting

Phenomenon, 130 “The force of Fancy could no further go,” 216 The Fêtes

for the Polish, 249 The Fire at the Tower, 195 The Gent’s Own Book, 63,

75, 85, 98, 147, 190, 207 The Great Cricket Match at St. Stephen’s, 87

The Golden-square Revolution, 99 The Geology of Society, 178 The High-

road to Gentility, 257 The Knatchbull Testimonial, 243 The late

Promotions, 264 The Legal Eccalobeion, 52 The Lord Mayor’s Fool, 214 The

Lord Mayors and the Queen, 202 The Loves of the Plants, 26 The Lost Med.

Papers of the British Assoc., 94 The Limerick Mares, 231 The Lambeth

Demosthenes, 219 The Light of all Nations, 130 The Minto House

Manifesto, 45 The Ministerial TOP, 123 The Mansion-house Parrot, 58 The

Money Market, 69 The Moral of Punch, 1 The Male Dalilah, 227 The Masons

and the Stone Jug, 216 The Ministry’s Ode to the Passions, 93 The New

Doctor’s System, 132 The Normandie “No-go,” 29 The New Administration,

100 The New House, 29 The New State Stretcher, 173 The O’Connell Papers,

208 The Prince of Wales, 226 The Packed Jury, 87 The Pensive Peel, 183

The Prince of Wales—his Future Times, 222 The Prince’s Extra, 216 The

Rival Candidates, 196 The Rape of the Lock-up, 228 The Royal Bulletins,

226 The Rich Old Buffer, 77 The Rising Sun, 17 The Royal Lion and

Unicorn—a Dialogue, 50 The Statistical Society, 110 The School of Design

at Hookham-cum-Snivey, 269 The Star System, 231 The Speakership, 58 The

Two Fatal Chiropedists, 89 The Two Macbeths, or the Haymarket Gemini, 47

The Tory Peacocks and the Finsbury Daw, 139 The Tory Table d’Hôte, 52

The Thorny Premier, 144 The Tea-service on Sea-service, 170 The Two New

Equity Judges, 202 The Two last Important Sittings, 180 The Unkindest

Cut of All, 221 The very “next” Jonathan, 157 The Value of Stocks—Last

Quotation, 166 The Wheels of Fortune, 226 The Wise Man of the East, 250

The “Well-dressed” and the “Well-to-do,” 138 The War with China, 168 The

“Weight” of Royalty—the Social “Scale,” 270 The Wapping Deluge, 178 The

Whigs’ last Dying Speech, 66 Those Diving Belles! those Diving Belles!

158 To the Laughter-loving Public, 23 “Try our best Sympathy,” 190 To

bad Jokers, 40 To benevolent and humane Jokers, 168 To Fancy Builders

and Capitalists, 38 To Mr. Green, the Inspector of Highways, 74 To

Professors of Languages who give Long Credit, 144 To Punsters and

others, 274 To Sir Rhubarb Pill, M.P. and M.D., 123 To Sir F—s B—t, 39

To Sir Robert, 149 To the Black-balled of the United Service, 9

Transactions of the Soc. of Hookham-cum-Snivey, 141 Transactions and

Yearly Report of do., 105, 118 Tremendous Failure, 207 A man's face in a

U-shaped frame University of London, 51 Vocal Evasion, 83 Verses on Miss

Chaplin, 238 “Very Like a Whale,” 173 Three men form a letter W War to

the Nail, 136 Waterford Election, 29 W(h)at Tyler, 122 What, ho!

Apothecary, 23 “When Vulcan Forged,” &c., 197 Whig-Waggeries, 13 Who are

to be the Lords in Waiting, 99 Wit without Money, 38, 71 END OF THE

FIRST VOLUME.

PUNCH, OR THE LONDON CHARIVARI. VOL. 1. [pg 1] JULY 17, 1841. THE MORAL

OF PUNCH. As we hope, gentle public, to pass many happy hours in your

society, we think it right that you should know something of our

character and intentions. Our title, at a first glance, may have misled

you into a belief that we have no other intention than the amusement of

a thoughtless crowd, and the collection of pence. We have a higher

object. Few of the admirers of our prototype, merry Master PUNCH, have

looked upon his vagaries but as the practical outpourings of a rude and

boisterous mirth. We have considered him as a teacher of no mean

pretensions, and have, therefore, adopted him as the sponsor for our

weekly sheet of pleasant instruction. When we have seen him parading in

the glories of his motley, flourishing his baton (like our friend

Jullien at Drury-lane) in time with his own unrivalled discord, by which

he seeks to win the attention and admiration of the crowd, what visions

of graver puppetry have passed before our eyes! Golden circlets, with

their adornments of coloured and lustrous gems, have bound the brow of

infamy as well as that of honour—a mockery to both; as though virtue

required a reward beyond the fulfilment of its own high purposes, or

that infamy could be cheated into the forgetfulness of its vileness by

the weight around its temples! Gilded coaches have glided before us, in

which sat men who thought the buzz and shouts of crowds a guerdon for

the toils, the anxieties, and, too often, the peculations of a life. Our

ears have rung with the noisy frothiness of those who have bought their

fellow-men as beasts in the market-place, and found their reward in the

sycophancy of a degraded constituency, or the patronage of a venal

ministry—no matter of what creed, for party must destroy patriotism.

The noble in his robes and coronet—the beadle in his gaudy livery of

scarlet, and purple, and gold—the dignitary in the fulness of his

pomp—the demagogue in the triumph of his hollowness—these and other

visual and oral cheats by which mankind are cajoled, have passed in

review before us, conjured up by the magic wand of PUNCH.

How we envy his philosophy, when SHALLA-BA-LA, that demon with the bell,

besets him at every turn, almost teasing the sap out of him! The moment

that his tormentor quits the scene, PUNCH seems to forget the existence

of his annoyance, and, carolling the mellifluous numbers of Jim Crow, or

some other strain of equal beauty, makes the most of the present,

regardless of the past or future; and when SHALLA-BA-LA renews his

persecutions, PUNCH boldly faces his enemy, and ultimately becomes the

victor. All have a SHALLA-BA-LA in some shape or other; but few, how

few, the philosophy of PUNCH!

We are afraid our prototype is no favourite with the ladies. PUNCH is

(and we reluctantly admit the fact) a Malthusian in principle, and

somewhat of a domestic tyrant; for his conduct is at times harsh and

ungentlemanly to Mrs. P.

“Eve of a land that still is Paradise,

Italian beauty!”

But as we never look for perfection in human nature, it is too much to

expect it in wood. We wish it to be understood that we repudiate such

principles and conduct. We have a Judy of our own, and a little

Punchininny that commits innumerable improprieties; but we fearlessly

aver that we never threw him out of window, nor belaboured the lady with

a stick—even of the size allowed by law.

There is one portion of the drama we wish was omitted, for it always

saddens us—we allude to the prison scene. PUNCH, it is true, sings in

durance, but we hear the ring of the bars mingling with the song. We are

advocates for the correction of offenders; but how many generous and

kindly beings are there pining within the walls of a prison, whose only

crimes are poverty and misfortune! They, too, sing and laugh, and appear

jocund, but the heart can ever hear the ring of the bars.

We never looked upon a lark in a cage, and heard him trilling out his

music as he sprang upwards to the roof of his prison, but we felt

sickened with the sight and sound, as contrasting, in our thought, the

free minstrel of the morning, bounding as it were into the blue caverns

of the heavens, with the bird to whom the world was circumscribed. May

the time soon arrive, when every prison shall be a palace of the

mind—when we shall seek to instruct and cease to punish. PUNCH has

already advocated education by example. Look at his dog Toby! The

instinct of the brute has almost germinated into reason. Man has reason,

why not give him intelligence?

We now come to the last great lesson of our motley teacher—the gallows!

that accursed tree which has its root in injuries. How clearly PUNCH

exposes the fallacy of that dreadful law which authorises the

destruction of life! PUNCH sometimes destroys the hangman: and why not?

Where is the divine injunction against the shedder of man’s blood to

rest? None can answer! To us there is but ONE disposer of life. At other

times PUNCH hangs the devil: this is as it should be. Destroy the

principle of evil by increasing the means of cultivating the good, and

the gallows will then become as much a wonder as it is now a jest.

We shall always play PUNCH, for we consider it best to be merry and

wise—

“And laugh at all things, for we wish to know,

What, after all, are all things but a show!”—Byron.

As on the stage of PUNCH’S theatre, many characters appear to fill up

the interstices of the more important story, so our pages will be

interspersed with trifles that have no other object than the moment’s

approbation—an end which will never be sought for at the expense of

others, beyond the evanescent smile of a harmless satire.

COMMERCIAL INTELLIGENCE. There is a report of the stoppage of one of the

most respectable hard-bake houses in the metropolis. The firm had been

speculating considerably in “Prince Albert’s Rock,” and this is said to

have been the rock they have ultimately split upon. The boys will be the

greatest sufferers. One of them had stripped hia jacket of all its

buttons as a deposit on some tom-trot, which the house had promised to

supply on the following day; and we regret to say, there are whispers of

other transactions of a similar character.

Money has been abundant all day, and we saw a half-crown piece and some

halfpence lying absolutely idle in the hands of an individual, who, if

he had only chosen to walk with it into the market, might have produced

a very alarming effect on some minor description of securities. Cherries

were taken very freely at twopence a pound, and Spanish (liquorice) at a

shade lower than yesterday. There has been a most disgusting glut of

tallow all the week, which has had an alarming effect on dips, and

thrown a still further gloom upon rushlights.

The late discussions on the timber duties have brought the match market

into a very unsettled state, and Congreve lights seem destined to

undergo a still further depression. This state of things was rendered

worse towards the close of the day, by a large holder of the last-named

article unexpectedly throwing an immense quantity into the market, which

went off rapidly.

SOMETHING WARLIKE. Many of our readers must be aware, that in pantomimic

pieces, the usual mode of making the audience acquainted with anything

that cannot be clearly explained by dumb-show, is to exhibit a linen

scroll, on which is painted, in large letters, the sentence necessary to

be known. It so happened that a number of these scrolls had Been thrown

aside after one of the grand spectacles at Astley’s Amphitheatre, and

remained amongst other lumber in the property-room, until the late

destructive fire which occurred there. On that night, the wife of one of

the stage-assistants—a woman of portly dimensions—was aroused from her

bed by the alarm of fire, and in her confusion, being unable to find her

proper habiliments, laid hold of one of these scrolls, and wrapping it

around her, hastily rushed into the street, and presented to the

astonished spectators an extensive back view, with the words, “BOMBARD

THE CITADEL,” inscribed in legible characters upon her singular drapery.

HUME’S TERMINOLOGY. Hume is so annoyed at his late defeat at Leeds, that

he vows he will never make use of the word Tory again as long as he

lives. Indeed, he proposes to expunge the term from the English

language, and to substitute that which is applied to, his own party. In

writing to a friend, that “after the inflammatory character of the

oratory of the Carlton Club, it is quite supererogatory for me to state

(it being notorious) that all conciliatory measures will be rendered

nugatory,” he thus expressed himself:—“After the inflammawhig character

of the orawhig of the nominees of the Carlton Club, it is quite

supererogawhig for me to state (it being nowhigous) that all

conciliawhig measures will be rendered nugawhig.”

NATIVE SWALLOWS. A correspondent to one of the daily papers has

remarked, that there is an almost total absence of swallows this summer

in England. Had the writer been present at some of the election dinners

lately, he must have confessed that a greater number of active swallows

has rarely been observed congregated in any one year.

LORD MELBOURNE TO “PUNCH.” My dear PUNCH,—Seeing in the “Court Circular”

of the Morning Herald an account of a General Goblet as one of the

guests of her Majesty, I beg to state, that till I saw that

announcement, I was not aware of any other general gobble it than myself

at the Palace.

Yours, truly, MELBOURN

[pg 2] A RAILROAD NOVEL DEAR PUNCH,—I was much amused the other day, on

taking my seat in the Birmingham Railway train, to observe a

sentimental-looking young gentleman, who was sitting opposite to me,

deliberately draw from his travelling-bag three volumes of what appeared

to me a new novel of the full regulation size, and with intense interest

commence the first volume at the title-page. At the same instant the

last bell rang, and away started our train, whizz, bang, like a flash of

lightning through a butter-firkin. I endeavoured to catch a glimpse of

some familiar places as we passed, but the attempt was altogether

useless. Harrow-on-the-Hill, as we shot by it, seemed to be driving

pell-mell up to town, followed by Boxmoor, Tring, and Aylesbury—I missed

Wolverton and Weedon while taking a pinch of snuff—lost Rugby and

Coventry before I had done sneezing, and I had scarcely time to say,

“God bless us,” till I found we had reached Birmingham. Whereupon I

began to calculate the trifling progress my reading companion could have

made in his book during our rapid journey, and to devise plans for the

gratification of persons similarly situated as my fellow-traveller.

“Why,” thought I, “should literature alone lag in the age of steam? Is

there no way by which a man could be made to swallow Scott or bolt

Bulwer, in as short a time as it now takes him to read an auction bill?”

Suddenly a happy thought struck me: it was to write a novel, in which

only the actual spirit of the narration should be retained, rejecting

all expletives, flourishes, and ornamental figures of speech; to be

terse and abrupt in style—use monosyllables always in preference to

polysyllables—and to eschew all heroes and heroines whose names contain

more than four letters. Full of this idea, on my returning home in the

evening, I sat to my desk, and before I retired to rest, had written a

novel of three neat, portable volumes; which, I assert, any lady or

gentlemen, who has had the advantage of a liberal education, may get

through with tolerable ease, in the time occupied by the railroad train

running from London to Birmingham.

I will not dilate on the many advantages which this description of

writing possesses over all others. Lamplighters, commercial bagmen,

omnibus-cads, tavern-waiters, and general postmen, may “read as they

run.” Fiddlers at the theatres, during the rests in a piece of music,

may also benefit by my invention; for which, if the following specimen

meet your approbation, I shall instantly apply for a patent.

SPECIMEN. CLARE GREY: A NOVEL. “Brief let me be.” LONDON: Printed and

Published for the Author. 1841. VOL. I. Clare Grey—Sweet girl—Bloom and

blushes, roses, lilies, dew-drops, &c.—Tom Lee—Young, gay, but

poor—Loved Clare madly—Clare loved Tom ditto—Clare’s pa’ rich, old,

cross, cruel, &c.—Smelt a rat—D—d Tom, and swore at Clare—Tears, sighs,

locks, bolts, and bars—Love’s schemes—Billet-doux from Tom, conveyed to

Clare in a dish of peas, crammed with vows, love, despair, hope—Answer

(pencil and curl-paper), slipped through key-hole—Full of hope, despair,

love, vows—Tom serenades—Bad cold—Rather hoarse—White kerchief from

garret-window—“’Tis Clare! ’tis Clare!”—Garden-wall, six feet high—Love

is rash—Scale the wall—Great house-dog at home—Pins Tom by the calf—Old

Hunk’s roused—Fire! thieves! guns, swords, and rushlights—Tom

caught—Murder, burglary—Station-house, gaol, justice—Fudge!—Pretty

mess—Heigho!—‘Oh! ’tis love,’ &c.—Sweet Clare Grey!—Seven pages of

sentiment—Lame leg, light purse, heavy heart—Pshaw!—Never mind—

Fellow operating a turnstile “THINGS MAY TAKE ANOTHER TURN”

VOL. II. “Adieu, my native land,” &c.—D.I.O.—“We part to meet

again”—Death or glory—Red coat—Laurels and rupees in view—Vows of

constancy, eternal truth, &c—Tom swells the brine with tears—Clare wipes

her eyes in cambric—Alas! alack! oh! ah!—Fond hearts, doomed to

part—Cruel fate!—Ten pages, poetry, romance, &c. &c.—Tom in battle—Cut,

slash, dash—Sabres, rifles—Round and grape in showers—Hot

work—Charge!—Whizz—Bang!—Flat as a Flounder—Never say die—Peace—Sweet

sound—Scars, wounds, wooden leg, one arm, and one eye—Half-

pay—Home—Huzza!—Swift gales—Post-horses—Love, hope, and Clare Grey—

A peg-legged, pirate cupid “I’D BE A BUTTERFLY,” &c.

VOL. III. “Here we are!”—At home once more—Old friends and old

faces—Must be changed—Nobody knows him—Church bells ringing—Inquire

cause—(?)—Wedding—Clare Grey to Job Snooks, the old pawnbroker—Brain

whirls—Eyes start from sockets—Devils and hell—Clare Grey, the fond,

constant, Clare, a jilt?—Can’t be—No go—Stump up to church—Too

true—Clare just made Mrs. Snooks—Madness!! rage!!! death!!!!—Tom’s

crutch at work—Snooks floored—Bridesman settled—Parson bolts—Clerk

mizzles—Salts and shrieks—Clare in a swoon—Pa’ in a funk—Tragedy

speech—Love! vengeance! and damnation!—Half an ounce of laudanum—Quick

speech—Tom unshackles his wooden pin—Dies like a hero—Clare pines in

secret—Hops the twig, and goes to glory in white muslin—Poor Tom and

Clare! they now lie side by side, beneath

A man sitting on a bench next to a tombstone “A WEEPING WILL-OH!”

LESSONS IN PUNMANSHIP. We have been favoured with the following

announcement from Mr. Hood, which we recommend to the earnest attention

of our subscribers:—

MR. T. HOOD, PROFESSOR OF PUNMANSHIP,

Begs to acquaint the dull and witless, that he has established a class

for the acquirement of an elegant and ready style of punning, on the

pure Joe-millerian principle. The very worst hands are improved in six

short and mirthful lessons. As a specimen of his capability, he begs to

subjoin two conundrums by Colonel Sibthorpe.

COPY.

“The following is a specimen of my punning before taking six lessons of

Mr. T. Hood:—

“Q. Why is a fresh-plucked carnation like a certain cold with which

children are affected?

“A. Because it’s a new pink off (an hooping-cough).

“This is a specimen of my punning after taking six lessons of Mr. T.

Hood:—

“Q. Why is the difference between pardoning and thinking no more of an

injury the same as that between a selfish and a generous man?

“A. Because the one is for-getting and the other for-giving.”

N.B. Gentlemen who live by their wits, and diners-out in particular,

will find Mr. T. Hood’s system of incalculable service.

Mr. H. has just completed a large assortment of jokes, which will be

suitable for all occurrences of the table, whether dinner or tea. He has

also a few second-hand bon mots which he can offer a bargain.

? A GOOD LAUGHER WANTED.

[pg 3] A SYNOPSIS OF VOTING, ARRANGED ACCORDING TO THE CATEGORIES OF

“CANT.” There hath been long wanting a full and perfect Synopsis of

Voting, it being a science which hath become exceedingly complicated. It

is necessary, therefore, to the full development of the art, that it be

brought into such an exposition, as that it may be seen in a glance what

are the modes of bribing and influencing in Elections. The briber, by

this means, will be able to arrange his polling-books according to the

different categories, and the bribed to see in what class he shall most

advantageously place himself.

It is true that there be able and eloquent writers greatly experienced

in this noble science, but none have yet been able so to express it as

to bring it (as we hope to have done) within the range of the certain

sciences. Henceforward, we trust it will form a part of the public

education, and not be subject tot he barbarous modes pursued by

illogical though earnest and zealous disciples; and that the great and

glorious Constitution that has done so much to bring it to perfection,

will, in its turn, be sustained and matured by the exercise of what is

really in itself so ancient and beautiful a practice.

VOTING MAY BE CONSIDERED AS 1st. He that hath NOT A VOTE AND VOTETH;

which may be considered, 1st. As to his CLAIM, which is divisible into

He that voteth for dead men. He that voteth for empty tenements. He that

voteth for many men. He that voteth for men in the country, and the

like. 2nd. As to his MOTIVE, which is divisible into Because he hath a

bet that he will vote. Because he loveth a lark. Because he LOVETH HIS

COUNTRY. [Here also may be applied all the predicates under the subjects

BRIBING, HUMBUG, and PRINCIPLE.] 2nd. He that hath A VOTE AND VOTETH

NOT; which is divisible into 1st. He that is PREVENTED from voting,

which is divisible into He who is upset by a bribed coachman. He who is

incited into an assault, that he may be put into the cage. He who is

driven by a drunken coachman many miles the wrong way. He who is

hocussed. He who is sent into the country for a holiday, and the like.

2nd. He that FORFEITETH his vote, which is divisible into He who is too

great a philosopher to care for his country. He who has not been

solicited. He who drinketh so that he cannot go to the poll. He who is

too drunk to speak at the poll. He who through over-zeal getteth his

head broken. He who stayeth to finish the bottle, and is too late, and

the like. 3rd. He that hath A VOTE AND VOTETH; which is divisible into

1st. He that voteth INTENTIONALLY, which is divisible into 1st. He that

voteth CORRUPTLY, which is divisible into 1st. He that is BRIBED, which

is divisible into 1st. He that is bribed DIRECTLY, which is divisible

into 1st. He that receiveth MONEY, which may be considered as He that

pretendeth the money is due to him. He that pretendeth it is lent. He

who receiveth it as alms. He who receiveth it as the price of a

venerated tobacco-pipe, a piece of Irish bacon, and the like. 2nd. He

that seeketh PLACE, which may be considered as He who asketh for a high

situation, as a judgeship in Botany Bay, or a bishopric in Sierra Leone,

and the like. He who asketh for a low situation, as a ticket-porter,

curate, and the like. He who asketh for any situation he can get, as

Secretary to the Admiralty, policeman, revising barrister, turnkey,

chaplain, mail-coach guard, and the like. 3rd. He that taketh DRINK,

which may be considered as He that voteth for Walker’s Gooseberry, or

Elector’s Sparkling Champagne. For sloe-juice, or Elector’s fine old

crusted Port. He who voteth for Brett’s British Brandy, or Elector’s

real French Cognac. He who voteth for quassia, molasses, copperas,

coculus Indicus, Spanish juice, or Elector’s Extra Double Stout. 2nd. He

that is bribed INDIRECTLY, as He who is promised a government contract

for wax, wafers, or the like. He who getteth a contract, for paupers’

clothing, building unions, and the like. He who furnisheth the

barouches-and-four for the independent 40s. freeholders. He who is

presented with cigars, snuffs, meerschaum-pipes, haunches of venison,

Stilton-cheeses, fresh pork, pine-apples, early peas, and the like. 2nd.

He that is INTIMIDATED, as By his landlord, who soliciteth back rent, or

giveth him notice to quit. By his patron, who sayeth they of the

opposite politics cannot be trusted. By his master, who sayeth he

keepeth no viper of an opposite opinion in his employ. By his wife, who

will have her own way in hysterics. By his intended bride, who talketh

of men of spirit and Gretna Green. By a rich customer, who sendeth back

his goods, and biddeth him be d—d. 3rd. He that is VOLUNTARILY CORRUPT,

which may be considered as He who voteth from the hope that his party

will provide him a place. He who voteth to please one who can leave him

a legacy. He who voteth to get into genteel society. He who voteth

according as he hath taken the odds. He who, being a schoolmaster,

voteth for the candidate with a large family. He who voteth in hopes

posterity may think him a patriot. 2nd. He that voteth CONSCIENTIOUSLY,

which is divisible into 1st. He that voteth according to HUMBUG, which

is divisible into 1st. He that is POLITICALLY humbugged, which is

divisible into 1st. He has SOME BRAINS, as He who believeth taxes will

be taken off. He who believeth wages will be raised. He who thinketh

trade will be increased. He who studieth political economy. He who

readeth newspapers, reviews, and magazines, and listeneth to lectures,

and the like. 2nd. He that has NO BRAINS, as He who voteth to support

“the glorious Constitution,” and maintain “the envy of surrounding

nations.” He who believeth the less the taxation the greater the

revenue. He who attendeth the Crown and Anchor meetings, and the like.

2nd. He that is MORALLY humbugged, as He who thinketh the Millennium and

the Rads will come in together. He who thinketh that the Whigs are

patriots. That the Tories love the poor. That the member troubleth

himself solely for the good of his country. That the unions are popular

with the paupers, and the like. 3rd. He that is DOMESTICALLY humbugged,

as He who voteth because the candidate’s ribbons suit his wife’s

complexion. Because his wife was addressed as his daughter by the

canvasser. Because his wife had the candidate’s carriage to make calls

in, and the like. Because his daughter was presented with a set of the

Prince Albert Quadrilles. Because the candidate promised to stand

godfather to his last infant, and the like. 2nd. He that voteth

according to PRINCIPLE, which is divisible into 1st. He whose principles

are HEREDITARY, as He who voteth on one side because his father always

voted on the same. Because the “Wrong-heads” and the like had always sat

for the county. Because he hath kindred with an ancient political hero,

such as Jack Cade, Hampden, the Pretender, &c., and so must maintain his

principle. Because his mother quartereth the Arms of the candidate, and

the like. 2nd. He whose principles are CONVENTIONAL, as He who voteth

because the candidate keepeth a pack of hounds. Because he was once

insulted by a scoundrel of the same name as the opposite candidate.

Because the candidate is of a noble family. Because the candidate laid

the first brick of Zion Chapel, and the like. Because he knoweth the

candidate’s cousin. Because the candidate directed to him—“Esq.” 3rd. He

whose principles are PHILOSOPHICAL, which may be considered as 1st. He

that is IMPARTIAL, as He that voteth on both sides. Because he tossed up

with himself. He who loveth the majority and therefore voteth for him

who hath most votes. Because he is asked to vote one way, and so voteth

the other, to show that he is not influenced. Because he hateth the

multitude, and so voteth against the popular candidate. 2nd. He that is

INDEPENDENT, as He who cannot be trusted. He who taketh money from one

side, and voteth on the other. He who is not worth bribing. He who

voteth against his own opinion, because his letter was not answered. He

who, being promised a place last election, was deceived, and the like.

2nd. He that voteth ACCIDENTALLY, which is divisible into 1st. He that

voteth through the BLUNDERS OF HIMSELF, which may be considered as He

who is drunk, and forgetteth who gave him the bribe. He who goeth to the

wrong agent, who leadeth him astray. He who is confused and giveth the

wrong name. He who is bashful, and assenteth to any name suggested. He

who promiseth both parties, and voteth for all the candidates, and the

like. 2nd. He that voteth through the BLUNDERS OF OTHERS, which may be

considered as He who is mistaken for his servant when he is canvassed,

and so incensed into voting the opposite way. He who is attempted to be

bribed before many people, and so outraged into honesty. He who hath too

much court paid by the canvasser to his wife, and so, out of jealousy,

voteth for the opposite candidate. He who is called down from dinner to

be canvassed, and being enraged thereat, voteth against his conviction.

He who bringeth the fourth seat in a hackney-coach to him who keepeth a

carriage and the like. [pg 4] THE PROFESSIONAL SINGER Have any of

PUNCH’S readers ever met one of the above genus—or rather, have they

not? They must; for the race is imbued with the most persevering hic et

ubique powers. Like the old mole, these Truepennies “work i’ th’ dark:”

at the Theatres, the Opera, the Coal Hole, the Cider Cellars, and the

whole of the Grecian, Roman, British, Cambrian, Eagle, Lion, Apollo,

Domestic, Foreign, Zoological, and Mythological Saloons, they “most do

congregate.” Once set your eyes upon them, once become acquainted with

their habits and manners, and then mistake them if you can. They are

themselves, alone: like the London dustmen, the Nemarket jockeys, the

peripatetic venders, or buyers of “old clo’,” or the Albert

continuations at one pound one, they appear to be made to measure for

the same. We must now describe them (to speak theatrically) with

decorations, scenes, and properties! The entirely new dresses of a

theatre are like the habiliments of the professional singer, i.e.

neither one nor the other ever were entirely new, and never will be

allowed to grow entirely old. The double-milled Saxony of these worthies

is generally very blue or very brown; the cut whereof sets a man of a

contemplative turn of mind wondering at what precise date those tails

were worn, and vainly speculating on the probabilities of their being

fearfully indigestible, as that alone could to long have kept them from

Time’s remorseless maw. The collars are always velvet, and always

greasy. There is a slight ostentation manifested in the seams, the

stitches whereof are so apparent as to induce the beholders to believe

they must have been the handiwork of some cherished friend, whose

labours ought not to be entombed beneath the superstructure. The

buttons!—oh, for a pen of steam to write upon those buttons! They,

indeed, are the aristocracy—the yellow turbans, the sun, moon, and stars

of the woollen system! They have nothing in common with the coat—they

are on it, and that’s all—they have no further communion—they decline

the button-holes, and eschew all right to labour for their living—they

announce themselves as “the last new fashion”—they sparkle for a week,

retire to their silver paper, make way for the new comers, and, years

after, like the Sleeping Beauty, rush to life in all their pristine

splendour, and find (save in the treble-gilt aodication and their own

accession) the coat, the immortal coat, unchanged! The waistcoat is of a

material known only to themselves—a sort of nightmare illusion of

velvet, covered with a slight tracery of refined mortar, curiously

picked out and guarded with a nondescript collection of the very

greenest green pellets of hyson-bloom gunpowder tea. The buttons (things

of use in this garment) describe the figure and proportions of a large

turbot. They consist of two rows (leaving imagination to fill up a lapse

of the absent), commencing, to all appearance, at the small of the back,

and reaching down even to the hem of the garment, which is invariably a

double-breasted one, made upon the good old dining-out principle of

leaving plenty of room in the victualling department. To complete the

catalogue of raiment, the untalkaboutables have so little right to the

name of drab, that it would cause a controversy on the point. Perhaps

nothing in life can more exquisitely illustrate the Desdemona feeling of

divided duty, than the portion of manufactured calf-skin appropriated to

the peripatetic purposes of these gentry; they are, in point of fact,

invariably that description of mud-markers known in the purlieus of

Liecester-square, and at all denominations of “boots”—great, little,

red, and yellow—as eight-and-sixpenny Bluchers. But the afore-mentioned

drabs are strapped down with such pertinacity as to leave the observer

in extreme doubt whether the Prussian hero of that name is their

legitimate sponsor, or the glorious Wellington of our own sea-girt isle.

Indeed, it has been rumoured that (as there never was a pair of either

of the illustrious heroes) these gentlemen, for the sake of consistency,

invariably perambulate in one of each. We scarcely know whether it be so

or not—we merely relate what we have heard; but we incline to the two

Bluchers, because of the eight-and-six. The only additional expense

likely to add any emolument to the tanner’s interest (we mean no pun) is

the immense extent of sixpenny straps generally worn. These are

described by a friend of ours as belonging to the great class of

coaxers; and their exertions in bringing (as a nautical man would say)

the trowsers to bear at all, is worthy of notice. There is a legend

extant (a veritable legend, which emanated from one of the fraternity

who had been engaged three weeks at her Majesty’s theatre, as one of

twenty in an unknown chorus, the chief peculiarity of the affair being

the close approximation of some of his principal foreign words to “Tol

de rol,” and “Fal the ral ra”), in which it was asserted, that from a

violent quarrel with a person in the grass-bleached line, the body

corporate determined to avoid any unnecessary use of that commodity. In

the way of wristbands, the malice of the above void is beautifully

nullified, inasmuch as the most prosperous linen-draper could never wish

to have less linen on hand. As we are describing the genus in black and

white, we may as well state at once, those are the colours generally

casing the throats from whence their sweet sounds issue; these ties are

garnished with union pins, whose strong mosaic tendency would, in the

Catholic days of Spain (had they been residents), have consigned them to

the lowest dungeons of the Inquisition, and favoured them with an exit

from this breathing world, amid all the uncomfortable pomp of an auto-

da-fe.

It is a fact on record, that no one of the body ever had a cold in his

head; and this peculiarity, we presume, exempts them from carrying

pocket-handkerchiefs, a superfluity we never witnessed in their hands,

though they indulge in snuff-boxes which assume the miniture form of

French plum-cases, richly embossed, with something round the edges about

as much in proportion to the box as eighteen insides are to a small tax-

cart. This testimonial is generally (as the engraved inscription

purports) given by “several gentlemen” (who are, unfortunately, in these

instances, always anonymous—which circumstance, as they are invariably

described as “admirers of talent,” is much to be regretted, and, we

trust, will soon be rectified). We believe, like the immortal Jack

Falstaff, they were each born at four o’clock of the morning, with a

bald head, and something of a round belly; certain it is, they are

universally thin in the hair, and exhibit strong manifestation of

obesity.

The further marks of identity consist in a ring very variously chased,

and the infallible insignia of a tuning-fork: without this no

professional singer does or can exist. The thing has been tried, and

found a failure. Its uses are remarkable and various: like the “death’s-

head and cross-bones” of the pirates, or the wand, globe, and beard of

the conjuror, it is their sure and unvarying sign. We have in our mind’s

eye one of the species even now—we see him coquetting with the fork,

compressing it with gentle fondness, and then (that all senses may be

called into requisition) resting it against his eye-tooth to catch the

proper tone. Should this be the prelude to his own professional

performance, we see it returned, with a look of profound wisdom, to the

right-hand depository of the nondescript and imaginary velvet double-

breaster—we follow his eyes, till, with peculiar fascination, they fix

upon the far-off cornice of the most distant corner of the smoke-embued

apartment—we perceive the extension of the dexter hand employed in

innocent dalliance with the well-sucked peel of a quarter of an orange,

whilst the left is employed with the links of what would be a watch-

guard, if the professional singer had a watch. We hear the three

distinct hems—oblivion for a moment seizes us—the glasses jingle—two

auctioneers’ hammers astonish the mahogany—several dirty hands are

brought in violent and noisy contact—we are near a friend of the

vocalist—our glass of gin-and-water (literally warm without) empties

itself over our lower extremities, instigated thereto by the gymnastic

performances of the said zealous friend—and with an exclamation that,

were Mawworn present, would cost us a shilling, we find the professional

singer has concluded, and is half stooping to the applause, and half

lifting his diligently-stirred grog, gulping down the “creature comfort”

with infinite satisfaction.

—There goes the hammer again! (Rubins has a sinecure compared to that

fat man). “A glee, gents!—a glee!”—Ah! there they are—three coats—three

collars—Heaven knows how many buttons!—three bald heads, three stout

stomachs, three mouths, stuffed with three tuning-forks, nodding and

conferring with a degree of mystery worthy of three Guy Faux.”—What is

the subject?

“Hail smilig born.”

That’s a good guess! By the way, the vulgar notion of singing ensemble

is totally exploded by these gentry—each professional singer, as a

professional singer, sings his very loudest, in justice to himself; if

his brethren want physical power, that’s no fault of his, he don’t.

Professional singers indulge in small portions of classic lore: among

the necessary acquirements is, “Non nobis,” &c. &c.; that is, they

consider they ought to know the airs. The words are generally delivered

as follows:—Don—dobis—do—by—de. A clear enunciation is not much

cultivated among the clever in this line.

In addition to the few particulars above, it may be as well to mention,

they treat all tavern-waiters with great respect, which is more

Christian-like, as the said waiters never return the same—sit anywhere,

just to accommodate—eat everything, to prove they have no squeamish

partialities—know to a toothful what a bottom of brandy should be—the

exact quantity they may drink, free gratis, and the most likely victim

to drop upon for any further nourishment they may require. Their

acquirements in the musical world are rendered clear, by the important

information that “Harry Phillips knows what he’s about”—“Weber was up to

a thing or two.” A baritone ain’t the sort of thing for tenor music: and

when they sung with some man (nobody ever heard of), they showed him the

difference, and wouldn’t mind—“A cigar?” “Thank you, sir!—seldom

smoke—put it in my pocket—(aside) that makes a dozen! Your good health,

sir!—don’t dislike cold, though I generally take it warm—didn’t mean

that as a hint, but, since you have ordered it, I’ll give you a

toast—Here’s—THE PROFESSIONAL SINGER!”

FUSBOS.

AN AN-TEA ANACREONTIC. ??S ?? ???? ?????. Bards of old have sung the

vine

Such a theme shall ne’er be mine;

Weaker strains to me belong,

Pæans sung to thee, Souchong!

What though I may never sip

Rubies from my tea-cup’s lip;

Do not milky pearls combine

In this steaming cup of mine?

What though round my youthful brow

I ne’er twine the myrtle’s bough?

For such wreaths my soul ne’er grieves.

Whilst I own my Twankay’s leaves.

Though for me no altar burns,

Kettles boil and bubble—urns

In each fane, where I adore—

What should mortal ask for more!

I for Pidding, Bacchus fly,

Howqua shall my cup supply;

I’ll ne’er ask for amphoræ,

Whilst my tea-pot yields me tea.

Then, perchance, above my grave,

Blooming Hyson sprigs may wave;

And some stately sugar-cane,

There may spring to life again:

Bright-eyed maidens then may meet,

To quaff the herb and suck the sweet.

[pg 5] A CONVERSATION BETWEEN TWO HACKNEY-COACH HORSES. KINDLY

COMMUNICATED BY OUR DOG “TOBY.” DEAR SIR,—I was a-sitting the other

evening at the door of my kennel, thinking of the dog-days and smoking

my pipe (blessings on you, master, for teaching me that art!), when one

of your prospectuses was put into my paw by a spaniel that lives as pet-

dog in a nobleman’s family. Lawk, sir! what misfortunes can have

befallen you, that you are obleeged to turn author?

I remember the poor devil as used to supply us with dialect—what a face

he had! It was like a mouth-organ turned edgeways; and he looked as

hollow as the big drum, but warn’t half so round and noisy. You can’t

have dwindled down to that, surely! I couldn’t bear to see your hump and

pars pendula (that’s dog Latin) shrunk up like dried almonds, and

titivated out in msty-fusty toggery—I’m sure I couldn’t! The very

thought of it is like a pound weight at the end of my tail.

I whined like any thing, calling to my missus—for you must know that

I’ve married as handsome a Scotch terrier as you ever see. “Vixen,” says

I, “here’s the poor old governor up at last—I knew that Police Act would

drive him to something desperate.”

“Why he hasn’t hung himself in earnest, and summoned you on his

inquest!” exclaimed Mrs. T.

“Worse nor that,” says I; “he’s turned author, and in course is stewed

up in some wery elevated apartment during this blessed season of the

year, when all nature is wagging with delight, and the fairs is on, and

the police don’t want nothing to do to warm ‘em, and consequentially

sees no harm in a muster of infantry in bye-streets. It’s very hawful.”

Vixen sighed and scratched her ear with her right leg, so I know’d she’d

something in her head, for she always does that when anything tickles

her. “Toby,” says she, “go and see the old gentleman; perhaps it might

comfort him to larrup you a little.”

“Very well,” says I, “I’ll be off at once; so put me by a bone or two

for supper, should any come out while I’m gone; and if you can get the

puppies to sleep before I return, I shall be so much obleeged to you.”

Saying which, I toddled off for Wellington-street. I had just got to the

coach-stand at Hyde Park Corner, when who should I see labelled as a

waterman but the one-eyed chap we once had as a orchestra—he as could

only play “Jim Crow” and the “Soldier Tired.” Thinks I, I may as well

pass the compliment of the day with him; so I creeps under the hackney-

coach he was standing alongside on, intending to surprise him; but just

as I was about to pop out he ran off the stand to un-nosebag a cab-

horse. Whilst I was waiting for him to come back, I hears the off-side

horse in the wehicle make the following remark:—

OFF-SIDE HORSE—(twisting his tail about like anything)—Curse the flies!

NEAR-SIDE HORSE.—You may say that. I’ve had one fellow tickling me this

half-hour.

OFF-SIDE HORSE.—Ours is a horrid profession! Phew! the sun actually

penetrates my vertebra.

NEAR-SIDE HORSE.—Werterbee! What’s that?

OFF-SIDE HORSE—(impatiently).—The spine, my friend (whish! whish!)

NEAR-SIDE HORSE.—Ah! it is a shameful thing to dock us as they does. If

the marrow in one’s backbone should melt, it would be sartin to run out

at the tip of one’s tail. I say, how’s your feed?

OFF-SIDE HORSE.—Very indifferent—the chaff predominates—(munch) not bene

by any means.

NEAR-SIDE HORSE.—Beany! Lord bless your ignorance! I should be satisfied

if they’d only make it oaty now and then. How long have you been in the

hackney line?

OFF-SIDE HORSE.—I have occupied my present degraded position about two

years. Little thought my poor mama, when I was foaled, that I should

ever come to this.

NEAR-SIDE HORSE.—Ah! it ain’t very respectable, is it?—especially since

the cabs and busses have druv over our heads. What was you put to?—you

look as if you had been well brought up.

OFF-SIDE HORSE.—My mama was own sister to Lottery, but unfortunately

married a horse much below her in pedigree. I was the produce of that

union. At five years old I entered the army under Ensign Dashard.

NEAR-SIDE HORSE—Bless me, how odd! I was bought at Horncastle, to serve

in the dragoons; but the wetternary man found out I’d a splint, and

wouldn’t have me! I say, ain’t that stout woman with a fat family

looking at us?

OFF-SIDE HORSE.—I’m afraid she is. People of her grade in society are

always partial to a dilatory shillingworth.

NEAR-SIDE HORSE—Ay, and always lives up Snow-hill, or Ludgate-hill, or

Mutton-hill, or a hill somewhere.

WOMAN.—Coach!

NEAR-SIDE HORSE.—She’s ahailing us! I wonder whether she’s narvous? I’ll

let out with my hind leg a bit—(kick)—O Lord! the rheumatiz!

OFF-SIDE HORSE.—Pray don’t. I abjure subterfuges; they are unworthy of a

thoroughbred.

NEAR-SIDE HORSE.—Thoroughbred? I like that! Haven’t you just

acknowledged that you were a cocktail? Thank God! she’s moving on.

Hallo! there’s old Readypenny!—a willanous Tory.

OFF-SIDE HORSE.—I beg to remark that my principles are Conservative.

NEAR-SIDE HORSE.—And I beg to remark that mine isn’t. I sarved

Readypenny out at Westminster ‘lection the other day. He got into our

coach to go to the poll, and I wouldn’t draw an inch. I warn’t agoing to

take up a plumper for Rous.

OFF-SIDE HORSE.—I declare the obese female returns.

WOMAN.—Coach! Hallo! Coach!

WATERMAN.—Here you is, ma’am. Kuck! kuck! kuck!—Come along!—(Pulling the

coach and horses).

OFF-SIDE HORSE.—O heavens! I am too stiff to move, and this brute will

pull my head off.

NEAR-SIDE HORSE.—Keep it on one side, and you spiles his purchase.

WATERMAN—Come up, you old brute!

OFF-SIDE HORSE.—Old brute! What evidence of a low mind!—[The stout woman

and fat family ascend the steps of the coach].

COACH.—O law! oh, law! Week! week! O law!—O law! Week! week!

NEAR-SIDE HORSE—Do you hear how the poor old thing’s a sufferin’?—She

must feel it a good deal to have her squabs sat on by everybody as can

pay for her. She was built by Pearce, of Long-acre, for the Duchess of

Dorsetshire. I wonder her perch don’t break—she has been crazy a long

time.

WATERMAN.—Snow-hill—opposite the Saracen’s Head.

NEAR-SIDE HORSE.—I know’d it!

COACHMAN.—Kuck! kuck!

WHIP.—Whack! whack!

OFF-SIDE HORSE.—Pull away, my dear fellow; a little extra exertion may

save us from flagellation.

NEAR-SIDE HORSE.—Well, I’m pulling, ain’t I?

OFF-SIDE HORSE.—I don’t like to dispute your word; but—(whack)—Oh! that

was an abrasion on my shoulder.

NEAR-SIDE HORSE.—A raw you mean. Who’s not pulling now, I should like to

know!

OFF-SIDE HORSE.—I couldn’t help hopping then; you know what a grease I

have in my hind leg.

NEAR-SIDE HORSE.—Well, haven’t I a splint and a corn, and ain’t one of

my fore fetlocks got a formoses, and my hind legs the stringhalt?

WOMAN.—Stop! stop!

COACHMAN.—Whoo up!—d—n you!

OFF-SIDE HORSE.—There goes my last masticator!

NEAR-SIDE HORSE.—And I’m blow’d if he hasn’t jerked my head so that he’s

given me a crick in the neck; but never mind; if she does get out here,

we shall save the hill.

WOMAN.—Three doors higher up.

COACHMAN.—Chuck! chuck!

WHIP.—Whack! whack!

COACHMAN.—Come up, you varmint!

OFF-SIDE HORSE—Varmint! and to me! the nephew of the great Lottery! O

Pegasus! what shall I come to next!

NEAR-SIDE HORSE.—Alamode beef, may be, or perhaps pork sassages!

The old woman was so long in that house where she stopped, that I was

obleeged to toddle home, for my wife has a rather unpleasant way of

taking me by the scruff of my neck if I ain’t pretty regular in my

hours.

Yours, werry obediently, TOBY.

COURT CIRCULAR. Communicated exclusively to this Journal by MASTER

JONES, whose services we have succeeded in retaining, though opposed by

the enlightened manager of a metropolitan theatre, whose anxiety to

advance the interest of the drama is only equalled by his ignorance of

the means.

Since the dissolution of Parliament, Lord Melbourne has confined himself

entirely to stews.

Stalls have been fitted up in the Royal nursery for the reception of two

Alderney cows, preparatory to the weaning of the infant Princess; which

delicate duty Mrs. Lilly commences on Monday next.

Sir Robert Peel has been seen several times this week in close

consultation with the chief cook. Has he been offered the premiership?

Mr. Moreton Dyer, “the amateur turner,” has been a frequent visitor at

the palace of late. Palmerston, it is whispered, has been receiving

lessons in the art. We are surprised to hear this, for we always

considered his lordship a Talleyrand in turning.

A QUARTER-DAY COGITATION. (WRITTEN ON THE BACK OF A “NOTED” TAILOR’S

BILL.) By winter’s chill the fragrant flower is nipp’d,

To be new-clothed with brighter tints in spring;

The blasted tree of verdant leaves is stripp’d,

A fresher foliage on each branch to bring;

The aërial songster moults his plumerie,

To vie in sleekness with each feather’d brother:

A twelvemonth’s wear hath ta’en thy nap from thee,

My seedy coat!—When shall I get another?

NOTE.—Confiding tailors are entreated to send their addresses, pre-paid,

to PUNCH’S office.

P.S.—None need apply who refuse three years’ acceptances. If the bills

be made renewable, by agreement, “continuations” will be taken in any

quantity.—FITZROY FIPS.

[pg 6] STREET POLITICS. A DRAMATIC DIALOGUE BETWEEN PUNCH AND HIS STAGE

MANAGER. (Enter PUNCH.)

PUNCH.—R-r-r-roo-to-tooit-tooit?

(Sings.)

“Wheel about and turn about,

And do jes so;

Ebery time I turn about,

I jump Jim Crow.”

MANAGER.—Hollo, Mr. Punch! your voice is rather husky to-day.

PUNCH.—Yes, yes; I’ve been making myself as hoarse as a hog, bawling to

the free and independent electors of Grogswill all the morning. They

have done me the honour to elect me as their representative in

Parliament. I’m an M.P. now.

MANAGER.—An M.P.! Gammon, Mr. Punch.

THE DOG TOBY.—Bow, wow, wow, wough, wough!

PUNCH.—Fact, upon my honour. I’m at this moment an unit in the

collective stupidity of the nation.

DOG TOBY.—R-r-r-r-r-r—wough—wough!

PUNCH.—Kick that dog, somebody. Hang the cur, did he never see a

legislator before, that he barks at me so?

MANAGER.—A legislator, Mr. Punch? with that wooden head of yours! Ho!

ho! ho! ho!

PUNCH.—My dear sir, I can assure you that wood is the material generally

used in the manufacture of political puppets. There will be more

blockheads than mine in St. Stephen’s, I can tell you. And as for

oratory, why I flatter my whiskers I’ll astonish them in that line.

MANAGER.—But on what principles did you get into Parliament, Mr. Punch?

PUNCH.—I’d have you know, sir, I’m above having any principles but those

that put money in my pocket.

MANAGER.—I mean on what interest did you start?

PUNCH.—On self-interest, sir. The only great, patriotic, and noble

feeling that a public man can entertain.

MANAGER.—Pardon me, Mr. Punch; I wish to know whether you have come in

as a Whig or a Tory?

PUNCH.—As a Tory, decidedly, sir. I despise the base, rascally, paltry,

beggarly, contemptible Whigs. I detest their policy, and—

THE DOG TOBY.—Bow, wow, wough, wough!

MANAGER.—Hollo! Mr. Punch, what are you saying? I understood you were

always a staunch Whig, and a supporter of the present Government.

PUNCH.—So I was, sir. I supported the Whigs as long as they supported

themselves; but now that the old house is coming down about their ears,

I turn my back on them in virtuous indignation, and take my seat in the

opposition ‘bus.

MANAGER.—-But where is your patriotism, Mr. Punch?

PUNCH.—Where every politician’s is, sir—in my breeches’ pocket.

MANAGER.—And your consistency, Mr. Punch?

PUNCH.—What a green chap you are, after all. A public man’s consistency!

It’s only a popular delusion, sir. I’ll tell you what’s consistency,

sir. When one gentleman’s in and won’t come out, and when another

gentleman’s out and can’t get in, and when both gentlemen persevere in

their determination—that’s consistency.

MANAGER.—I understand; but still I think it is the duty of every public

man to——

PUNCH.—(sings)—

“Wheel about and turn about, And do jes so; Ebery time he turn about, He

jumps Jim Crow.”

MANAGER.—Then it is your opinion that the prospects of the Whigs are not

very flattering?

PUNCH.—’Tis all up with them, as the young lady remarked when Mr. Green

and his friends left Wauxhall in the balloon; they haven’t a chance. The

election returns are against them everywhere. England deserts

them—Ireland fails them—Scotland alone sticks with national attachment

to their backs, like a—

THE DOG TOBY.—Bow, wow, wow, wough!

MANAGER.—Of course, then, the Tories will take office—?

PUNCH.—I rayther suspect they will. Have they not been licking their

chops for ten years outside the Treasury door, while the sneaking Whigs

were helping themselves to all the fat tit-bits within? Have they not

growled and snarled all the while, and proved by their barking that they

were the fittest guardians of the country? Have they not wept over the

decay of our ancient and venerable constitution—? And have they not

promised and vowed, the moment they got into office, that they

would—Send round the hat.

MANAGER.—Very good, Mr. Punch; but I should like to know what the Tories

mean to do about the corn-laws? Will they give the people cheap food?

PUNCH.—No, but they’ll give them cheap drink. They’ll throw open the

Thames for the use of the temperance societies.

MANAGER.—But if we don’t have cheap corn, our trade must be destroyed,

our factories will be closed, and our mills left idle.

PUNCH.—There you’re wrong. Our tread-mills will be in constant work;

and, though our factories should be empty, our prisons will be quite

full.

MANAGER.—That’s all very well, Mr. Punch; but the people will grumble a

leetle if you starve them.

PUNCH.—Ay, hang them, so they will; the populace have no idea of being

grateful for benefits. Talk of starvation! Pooh!—I’ve studied political

economy in a workhouse, and I know what it means. They’ve got a fine

plan in those workhouses for feeding the poor devils. They do it on the

homoeopathic system, by administering to them oatmeal porridge in

infinitessimal doses; but some of the paupers have such proud stomachs

that they object to the diet, and actually die through spite and

villany. Oh! ’tis a dreadful world for ingratitude! But never mind—Send

round the hat.

MANAGER.—What is the meaning of the sliding scale, Mr. Punch?

PUNCH.—It means—when a man has got nothing for breakfast, he may slide

his breakfast into his lunch; then, if he has got nothing for lunch, he

may slide that into his dinner; and if he labours under the same

difficulties with respect to the dinner, he may slide all three meals

into his supper.

MANAGER.—But if the man has got no supper?

PUNCH.—Then let him wish he may get it.

MANAGER.—Oh! that’s your sliding scale?

PUNCH.—Yes; and a very ingenious invention it is for the suppression of

victuals. R-r-r-roo-to-tooit-tooit! Send round the hat.

MANAGER.—At this rate, Mr. Punch, I suppose you would not be favourable

to free trade?

PUNCH.—Certainly not, sir. Free trade is one of your new-fangled notions

that mean nothing but free plunder. I’ll illustrate my position. I’m a

boy in a school, with a bag of apples, which, being the only apples on

my form, I naturally sell at a penny a-piece, and so look forward to

pulling in a considerable quantity of browns, when a boy from another

form, with a bigger bag of apples, comes and sells his at three for a

penny, which, of course, knocks up my trade.

MANAGER.—But it benefits the community, Mr. Punch.

PUNCH.—D—n the community! I know of no community but PUNCH and Co. I’m

for centralization—and individualization—every man for himself, and

PUNCH for us all! Only let me catch any rascal bringing his apples to my

form, and see how I’ll cobb him. So now—send round the hat—and three

cheers for

PUNCH’S POLITICS. SONGS FOR THE SENTIMENTAL. No. 1. O Reveal, thou fay-

like stranger,

Why this lonely path you seek;

Every step is fraught with danger

Unto one so fair and meek.

Where are they that should protect thee

In this darkling hour of doubt?

Love could never thus neglect thee!—

Does your mother know you’re out?

Why so pensive, Peri-maiden?

Pearly tears bedim thine eyes!

Sure thine heart is overladen,

When each breath is fraught with sighs.

Say, hath care life’s heaven clouded,

Which hope’s stars were wont to spangle?

What hath all thy gladness shrouded?—

Has your mother sold her mangle?

A PUBLIC CONVENIENCE. We are requested to state, by the Marquis of W——,

that, for the convenience of the public, he has put down one of his

carriages, and given orders to Pearce, of Long-acre, for the

construction of an easy and elegant stretcher.

[pg 7] CANDIDATES UNDER DIFFERENT PHASES A series of vignettes with

candidates: CANVASSING. What a love of a child THE DEPUTATION. If you

think me worthy THE SUCCESSFUL CANDIDATE. Constituents--rascals THE

HUSTINGS. Don't mention it I beg THE PUBLIC DINNER. The proudest moment

of my life CANVASSING. What a love of a child THE DEPUTATION. If you

think me worthy THE SUCCESSFUL CANDIDATE. Constituents--rascals THE

HUSTINGS. Don't mention it I beg THE PUBLIC DINNER. The proudest moment

of my life

[pg 9] FINE ARTS. PUNCH begs most solemnly to assure his friends and the

artists in general, that should the violent cold with which he has been

from time immemorial afflicted, and which, although it has caused his

voice to appear like an infant Lablache screaming through horse-hair and

thistles, yet has not very materially affected him otherwise—should it

not deprive him of existence—please Gog and Magog, he will, next season,

visit every exhibition of modern art as soon as the pictures are hung;

and further, that he will most unequivocally be down with his coup de

baton upon every unfortunate nob requiring his peculiar attention.

That he independently rejects the principles upon which these matters

are generally conducted, he trusts this will be taken as an assurance:

should the handsomest likeness-taker gratuitously offer to paint PUNCH’S

portrait in any of the most favourite and fashionable styles, from the

purest production of the general mourning school—and all performed by

scissars—to the exquisitely gay works of the President of the Royal

Academy, even though his Presidentship offer to do the nose with real

carmine, and throw Judy and the little one into the back-ground, PUNCH

would not give him a single eulogistic syllable unmerited. A word to the

landscape and other perpetrators: none of your little bits for

PUNCH—none of your insinuating cabinet gems—no Art-ful Union system of

doing things—Hopkins to praise for one reason, Popkins to censure for

another—and as PUNCH has been poking his nose into numberless unseen

corners, and, notwithstanding its indisputable dimensions, has managed

to screen it from observation, he has thereby smelt out several pretty

little affairs, which shall in due time be exhibited and explained in

front of his proscenium, for special amusement. In the mean time, to

prove that PUNCH is tolerably well up in this line of pseudo-criticism,

he has prepared the following description of the private view of either

the Royal Academy or the Suffolk-street Gallery, or the British

Institution, for 1842, for the lovers of this very light style of

reading; and to make it as truly applicable to the various specimens of

art forming the collection or collections alluded to, he has done it

after the peculiar manner practised by the talented conductor of a

journal purporting to be exclusively set apart to that effort. To

illustrate with what strict attention to the nature of the subject

chosen, and what an intimate knowledge of technicalities the writer

above alluded to displays, and with what consummate skill he blends

those peculiarities, the reader will have the kindness to attach the

criticism to either of the works (hereunder catalogued) most agreeably

to his fancy. It will be, moreover, shown that this is a thoroughly

impartial way of performing the operation of soft anointment.

THE UNERRING FOR PORTRAITS ONLY: Portrait of the miscreant who attempted

to assassinate Mr. Macreath. The head is extremely well painted, and the

light and shade distributed with the artist's usual judgement. VALENTINE

VERMILION. Portrait of His Majesty the King of Hanover. BY THE SAME.

Portrait of the boy who got into Buckingham Palace. GEOFFERY GLAZEM. OR

THUS: Portrait of Lord John Russell. An admirable likeness of the

original, and executed with that breadth and clearness so apparent in

this clever painter's works. BY THE SAME. Portrait of W. Grumbletone,

Esq., in the character of Joseph Surface. PETER PALETTE. Portrait of Sir

Robert Peel BY THE SAME. OR THUS: Portrait of the Empress of Russia. A

well-drawn and brilliantly painted portrait, calculated to sustain the

fame already gained by this our favourite painter. VANDYKE BROWN.

Portrait of the infant Princess. BY THE SAME. Portrait of Mary

Mumblegums, aged 170 years. BY THE SAME. THE UNERRING FOR EVERY SUBJECT:

The Death of Abel. This picture is well arranged and coloured with much

truth to nature; the chiaro-scuro is admirably managed. MICHAEL McGUELP.

Dead Game. THOMAS TICKLEPENCIL. Vesuvius in Eruption. CHARLES CARMINE,

R.A. Portraits of Mrs. Punch and Child. R.W. BUSS. Cattle returning from

the Watering Place. R. BOLLOCK. OR THUS: "We won't go home till

Morning." M. WATERFORD, R.H.S. This is one of the cleverest productions

in the Exhibition; there is a transparency in the shadows equal to

Rembrandt. The infant Cupid sleeping. R. DADD. Portrait of Lord

Palmerston. A.L.L. UPTON. Coast Scene: Smugglers on the look out. H.

PARKER. Portrait of Captain Rous, M.P. J. WOOD. Should the friends of

any of the artists deem the praise a little too oily, they can easily

add such a tag as the following:—“In our humble judgment, a little more

delicacy of handling would not be altogether out of place;” or,

“Beautiful as the work under notice decidedly is, we recollect to have

received perhaps as much gratification in viewing previous productions

by the same.”

FOR THE HALF CONDEMNED: This artist is, we much fear, on the decline; we

no longer see the vigour of handling and smartness of conception

formerly apparent in his works: or, “A little stricter attention to

drawing, as well as composition, would render this artist’s works more

recommendatory.”

THE TOTALLY CONDEMNED: Either of the following, taken conjointly or

separately: “A perfect daub, possessing not one single quality necessary

to create even the slightest interest—a disgrace to the Exhibition—who

allowed such a wretched production to disgrace these walls?—woefully out

of drawing, and as badly coloured,” and such like.

A COMMENTARY ON THE ELECTIONS. BY THE BEADLE OF SOMERSET HOUSE. Well,

lawks-a-day! things seem going on uncommon queer,

For they say that the Tories are bowling out the Whigs almost

everywhere;

And the blazing red of my beadle’s coat is turning to pink through fear,

Lest I should find myself and staff out of Office some time about the

end of the year.

I’ve done nothing so long but stand under the magnificent portico

Of Somerset House, that I don’t know what I should do if I was for to

go!

What the electors are at, I can’t make out, upon my soul,

For it’s a law of natur’ that the whig should be atop of the poll.

I’ve had a snug berth of it here for some time, and don’t want to cut

the connexion;

But they do say the Whigs must go out, because they’ve NO OTHER

ELECTION;

What they mean by that, I don’t know, for ain’t they been

electioneering—

That is, they’ve been canvassing, and spouting, and pledging, and

ginning, and beering.

Hasn’t Crawford and Pattison, Lyall, Masterman, Wood, and Lord John

Russell,

For ever so long been keeping the Great Metropolis in one alarming

bussel?

Ain’t the two first retired into private life—(that’s the genteel for

being rejected)?

And what’s more, the last four, strange to say, have all been elected.

Then Finsbury Tom and Mr. Wakley, as wears his hair all over his coat

collar,

Hav’n’t they frightened Mr. Tooke, who once said he could beat them

Hollar?

Then at Lambeth, ain’t Mr. Baldwin and Mr. Cabbell been both on ‘em

bottled

By Mr. D’Eyncourt and Mr. Hawes, who makes soap yellow and mottled!

And hasn’t Sir Benjamin Hall, and the gallant Commodore Napier,

Made such a cabal with Cabbell and Hamilton as would make any chap

queer?

Whilst Sankey, who was backed by a Cleave-r for Marrowbone looks cranky,

Acos the electors, like lisping babbies, cried out “No Sankee?”

Then South’ark has sent Alderman Humphrey and Mr. B. Wood,

Who has promised, that if ever a member of parliament did his duty—he

would!

Then for the Tower Hamlets, Robinson, Hutchinson, and Thompson, find

that they’re in the wrong box,

For the electors, though turned to Clay, still gallantly followed the

Fox;

Whilst Westminster’s chosen Rous—not Rouse of the Eagle—tho’ I once seed

a

Picture where there was a great big bird, very like a goose, along with

a Leda.

And hasn’t Sir Robert Peel and Mr. A’Court been down to Tamworth to be

reseated?

They ought to get an act of parliament to save them such fatigue, for

its always—ditto repeated.

Whilst at Leeds, Beckett and Aldam have put Lord Jocelyn into a

considerable fume,

Who finds it no go, though he’s added up the poll-books several times

with the calculating boy, Joe Hume.

So if there’s been no other election, I should like to find out

What all the late squibbing and fibbing, placarding, and blackguarding,

losing and winning, beering and ginning, and every other et cetera, has

been about!

TO THE BLACK-BALLED OF THE UNITED SERVICE. Black bottles at Brighton,

To darken your fame;

Black Sundays at Hounslow,

To add to your shame.

Black balls at the club,

Show Lord Hill’s growing duller:

He should change your command

To the guards of that colour.

[pg 10] ON THE INTRODUCTION OF PANTOMIME INTO THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE. A

man thumbing his nose English—it has been remarked a thousand and odd

times—is one of the few languages which is unaccompanied with

gesticulation. Your veritable Englishman, in his discourse, is as chary

as your genuine Frenchman is prodigal, of action. The one speaks like an

oracle, the other like a telegraph.

Mr. Brown narrates the death of a poor widower from starvation, with his

hands fast locked in his breeches’ pocket, and his features as calm as a

horse-pond. M. le Brun tells of the debut of the new danseuse, with

several kisses on the tips of his fingers, a variety of taps on the left

side of his satin waistcoat, and his head engulfed between his two

shoulders, like a cock-boat in a trough of the sea.

The cause of this natural diversity is not very apparent. The deficiency

of gesture on our parts may be a necessary result of that prudence which

is so marked a feature of the English character. Mr. Brown, perhaps,

objects to using two means to attain his end when one is sufficient, and

consequently looks upon all gesticulation during conversation as a

wicked waste of physical labour, which that most sublime and congenial

science of Pol. Econ. has shown him to be the source of all wealth. To

indulge in pantomime is, therefore, in his eyes, the same as throwing so

much money in the dirt—a crime which he regards as second in depravity

only to that of having none to throw. Napoleon said, many years back, we

were a nation of shopkeepers; and time seems to have increased, rather

than diminished, our devotion to the ledger. Gold has become our sole

standard of excellence. We measure a man’s respectability by his

banker’s account, and mete out to the pauper the same punishment as the

felon. Our very nobility is a nobility of the breeches’ pocket; and the

highest personage in the realm—her most gracious Majesty—the most

gracious Majesty of 500,000l. per annum! Nor is this to be wondered at.

To a martial people like the Romans, it was perfectly natural that

animal courage should be thought to constitute heroic virtue: to a

commercial people like ourselves, it is equally natural that a man’s

worthiness should be computed by what he is worth. We fear it is this

commercial spirit, which, for the reason before assigned, is opposed to

the introduction of pantomime among us; and it is therefore to this

spirit that we would appeal, in our endeavours to supply a deficiency

which we cannot but look upon as a national misfortune and disgrace. It

makes us appear as a cold-blooded race of people, which we assuredly are

not; for, after all our wants are satisfied, what nation can make such

heroic sacrifices for the benefit of their fellow creatures as our own?

A change, however, is coming over us: a few pantomimic signs have

already made their appearance amongst us. It is true that they are at

present chiefly confined to that class upon whose manners politeness

places little or no restraint—barbarians, who act as nature, rather than

as the book of etiquette dictates, (and among whom, for that very

reason, such a change would naturally first begin to show itself:) yet

do we trust, by pointing out to the more refined portion of the “British

public,” the advantage that must necessarily accrue from the general

cultivation of the art of pantomime, by proving to them its vast

superiority over the comparatively tedious operations of speech, and

exhibiting its capacity of conveying a far greater quantity of thought

in a considerably less space of time, and that with a saving of one-half

the muscular exertion—a point so perfectly consonant with the present

prevailing desire for cheap and rapid communication—that we say we hope

to be able not only to bring the higher classes to look upon it no

longer as a vulgar and extravagant mode of expression, but actually to

introduce and cherish it among them as the most polite and useful of all

accomplishments.

A man winking But in order to exhibit the capacities of this noble art

in all their comprehensive excellence, it is requisite that we should,

in the first place, say a few words on language in general.

It is commonly supposed that there are but two kinds of language among

men—the written and the spoken: whereas it follows, from the very nature

of language itself, that there must necessarily be as many modes of

conveying our impressions to our fellow-creatures, as there are senses

or modes of receiving impressions in them. Accordingly, there are five

senses and five languages; to wit, the audible, the visible, the

olfactory, the gustatory, and the sensitive. To the two first belong

speech and literature. As illustrations of the third, or olfactory

language, may be cited the presentation of a pinch of Prince’s Mixture

to a stranger, or a bottle of “Bouquet du Roi” to a fair acquaintance;

both of which are but forms of expressing to them nasally our respect.

The nose, however, is an organ but little cultivated in man, and the

language which appeals to it is, therefore, in a very imperfect state;

not so the gustatory, or that which addresses itself to the palate.

This, indeed, may be said to be imbibed with our mother’s milk. What

words can speak affection to the child like elecampane—what language

assures us of the remembrance of an absent friend like a brace of wood-

cocks? Then who does not comprehend the eloquence of dinners? A rump

steak, and bottle of old port, are not these to all guests the very

emblems of esteem—and turtle, venison, and champagne, the unmistakeable

types of respect? If the citizens of a particular town be desirous of

expressing their profound admiration of the genius of a popular author,

how can the sentiment be conveyed so fitly as in a public dinner? or if

a candidate be anxious to convince the “free and independent electors”

of a certain borough of his disinterested regard for the commonweal,

what more persuasive language could he adopt than the general

distribution of unlimited beer? Of the sensitive, or fifth and last

species of language, innumerable instances might be quoted. All

understand the difference in meaning between cuffs and caresses—between

being shaken heartily by the hand and kicked rapidly down stairs. Who,

however ignorant, could look upon the latter as a compliment? or what

fair maiden, however simple, would require a master to teach her how to

construe a gentle compression of her fingers at parting, or a tender

pressure of her toe under the dinner table?

Such is an imperfect sketch of the five languages appertaining to man.

There is, however, one other—that which forms the subject of the present

article—Pantomime, and which may be considered as the natural form of

the visible language—literature being taken as the artificial. This is

the most primitive as well as most comprehensive, of all. It is the

earliest, as it is the most intuitive—the smiles and frowns of the

mother being the first signs understood by the infant. Indeed, if we

consider for a moment that all existence is but a Pantomime, of which

Time is the harlequin, changing to-day into yesterday, summer into

winter, youth into old age, and life into death, and we but the clowns

who bear the kicks and buffets of the scene, we cannot fail to desire

the general cultivation of an art which constitutes the very essence of

existence itself. “Speech,” says Talleyrand, that profound political

pantomimist, “was given to conceal our thoughts;” and truly this is the

chief use to which it is applied. We are continually clamouring for acts

in lieu of words. Let but the art of Pantomime become universal, and

this grand desideratum must be obtained. Then we shall find that

candidates, instead of being able, as now, to become legislators by

simply professing to be patriots, will be placed in the awkward

predicament of having first to act as such; and that the clergy, in lieu

of taking a tenth part of the produce for the mere preaching of

Christianity, will be obliged to sacrifice at least a portion to

charitable purposes, and practise it.

Indeed, we are thoroughly convinced, that when the manifold advantages

of this beautiful art shall be generally known, it cannot fail of

becoming the principle of universal communication. Nor do we despair of

ultimately finding the elegant Lord A. avowing his love for the

beautiful Miss B., by gently closing one of his eyes, and the fair lady

tenderly expressing that doubt and incredulity which are the invariable

concomitants of “Love’s young dream,” by a gentle indication with the

dexter hand over the sinister shoulder.

A man laying a finger aside of his nose, and another with a thumbs-up AN

ALLIGATOR CHAIRMAN. An action was recently brought in the Court of

Queen’s Bench against Mr. Walter, to recover a sum of money expended by

a person named Clark, in wine, spirits, malt liquors, and other

refreshments, during a contest for the representation of the borough of

Southwark. One of the witnesses, who it appears was chairman of Mr.

Walter’s committee, swore that every thing the committee had to eat or

drink went through him. By a remarkable coincidence, the counsel for the

plaintiff in this tippling case was Mr. Lush.

[pg 11] AN ODE. PICKED UP IN KILLPACK’S DIVAN. Cum notis variorum.

“Excise Court.—An information was laid against Mr. Killpack, for selling

spirituous liquor. Mr. James (the counsel for the defendant) stated that

there was a club held there, of which Mr. Keeley, the actor, was

treasurer, and many others of the theatrical profession were members,

and that they had a store of brandy, whiskey, and other spirits. Fined

£5 in each case.”—Observer INVOCATION. Assist, ye jocal nine1,1. “Ye

jocal nine,” a happy modification of “Ye vocal nine.” The nine here so

classically invocated are manifestly nine of the members of the late

club, consisting of, 1. Mr. D—s J—d. 2. The subject of the engraving,

treasurer and store-keeper. 3. Mr. G—e S—h, sub-ed. J—— B——. 4. Mr. B—d,

Mem. Dram. Author’s Society. 5. C—s S—y, ditto. 6. Mr. C—e. 7. Mr. C—s,

T—s, late of the firm of T—s and P—t. 8. Mr. J—e A—n, Mem. Soc. British

Artists. 9, and lastly, “though not least,” the author of “You loved me

not in happier days.” inspire my soul!

(Waiter! a go of Brett’s best alcohol,

A light, and one of Killpack’s mild Havannahs).

Fire me! again I say, while loud hosannas

I sing of what we were—of what we now are.

Wildly let me rave,

To imprecate the knave

Whose curious information turned our porter sour,

Bottled our stout, doing it (ruthless cub!)

Brown,

Down

Knocking our snug, unlicensed club;

Changing, despite our belle esprit, at one fell swop,

Into a legal coffee-crib, our contraband cook-shop!

ODE. Then little Bob arose,

And doff’d his clothes,

Exclaiming, “Momus! Stuff!

I’ve played him long enough,”

And, as the public seems inclined to sack us,

Behold me ready dressed to play young Bacchus.

Bacchus straddling a barrel marked 'Best British Brandy Not Permitted'

He said22. “He said.”—Deeply imbued with the style of the most polished

of the classics, our author will be found to exhibit in some passages an

imitation of it which might be considered pedantic, for ourselves, we

admire the severe style. The literal rendering of the ‘dixit’ of the

ancient epicists, strikes us as being eitremely forcible here.—PUNCH.

his legs the barrel span,

And thus the Covent Garden god began;—

“GENTLEMEN,—I am—ahem—!—I beg your pardon,

But, ahem! as first low com. of Common Garden—

No, I don’t mean that, I mean to say,

That if we were—ahem!—to pay

So much per quarter for our quarterns, [Cries of ‘Hear!’]

Import our own champagne and ginger-beer;

In short, small duty pay on all we sup—

Ahem!—you understand—I give it up.”

The speech was ended,

And Bob descended.

The club was formed. A spicy club it was—

Especially on Saturdays; because

They dined extr’ordinary cheap at five o’clock:

When there were met members of the Dram. A. Soc.

Those of the sock and buskin, artists, court gazetteers—

Odd fellows all—odder than all their club compeers.

Some were sub-editors, others reporters,

And more illuminati, joke-importers.

The club was heterogen’ous

By strangers seen as

A refuge for destitute bons mots—

Dépôt for leaden jokes and pewter pots;

Repertory for gin and jeux d’esprit,

Literary pound for vagrant rapartee;

Second-hand shop for left-off witticisms;

Gall’ry for Tomkins and Pitt-icisms;33. A play-bill reminiscence, viz.

“The scenery by Messrs. Tomkins and Pitt.”—THE AUTHORS OF “BUT,

HOWEVER.”

Foundling hospital for every bastard pun;

In short, a manufactory for all sorts of fun!

Arouse my muse! such pleasing themes to quit,

Hear me while I say

“Donnez-moi du frenzy, s’il vous plait!”44. “Donnez-moi,” &c.—The

classics of all countries are aptly drawn upon by the universal

erudition of our bard. A fine parody this upon the exclamation of

Belmontel’s starving author: “La Gloire—donnez-moi do pain!”—FENWICK DE

PORQUET.

Give me a most tremendous fit

Of indignation, a wild volcanic ebullition,

Or deep anathema,

Fatal as J—d’s bah!

To hurl excisemen downward to perdition.

May genial gin no more delight their throttles—

Their casks grow leaky, bottomless their bottles;

May smugglers run, and they ne’er make a seizure;

May they—I’ll curse them further at my leisure.

But for our club,

“Ay, there’s the rub.”

“We mourn it dead in its father’s halls:”55. “They mourn it dead,” &c.—A

pretty, but perhaps too literal allusion to a popular song—J. RODWELL.—

The sporting prints are cut down from the walls;

No stuffing there,

Not even in a chair;

The spirits are all ex(or)cised,

The coffee-cups capsized,

The coffee fine-d, the snuff all taken,

The mild Havannahs are by lights forsaken:

The utter ruin of the club’s achieven—

Our very chess-boards are ex-chequered even.

“Where is our club?” X—sighs,66. “X—sighs.”—Who “X” may happen to be we

have not the remotest idea. But who would not forgive a little

mystification for so brilliant a pun?—THE GHOST OF PUNCH’S THEATRE. and

with a stare

Like to another echo, answers “Where?”

MR. HUME. We are requested by Mr. Hume to state, that being relieved

from his parliamentary duties, he intends opening a day-school in the

neighbourhood of the House of Commons, for the instruction of members

only, in the principles of the illustrious Cocker; and to remedy in some

measure his own absence from the Finance Committees, he is now engaged

in preparing a Parliamentary Ready-reckoner. We heartily wish him

success.

“PRIVATE.” “In the event of the Tories coming into power, it is intended

to confer the place of Postmaster-General upon Lord Clanwilliam. It

would be difficult to select an individual more peculiarly fitted for

the situation than his lordship, whose love of letters is notorious in

the Carlton Club.”—Extract from an Intercepted Letter.

“AND DOTH NOT A MEETING LIKE THIS MAKE AMENDS?” It is currently reported

at the Conservative Clubs, that if their party should come into power,

Sir Robert Peel will endeavour to conciliate the Whigs, and to form a

coalition with their former opponents. We have no doubt the cautious

baronet sees the necessity of the step, and would feel grateful for

support from any quarter; but we much doubt the practicability of the

measure. It would indeed he a strange sight to see Lord Johnny and Sir

Bobby, the two great leaders of the opposition engines, with their

followers, meeting amicably on the floor of the House of Commons. In our

opinion, an infernal crash and smash would be the result of these

Four trains meeting at an intersection with bodies strewn about. GRAND

JUNCTION TRAINS.

[pg 12] THE DRAMA. The “star system” has added another victim to the

many already sacrificed to its rapacity and injustice. Mr. Phelps, an

actor whose personation of Macduff, the Hunchback, Jaques, &c., would

have procured for him in former times no mean position, has been

compelled to secede from the Haymarket Theatre from a justifiable

feeling of disgust at the continual sacrifices he was required to make

for the aggrandisement of one to whom he may not possibly ascribe any

superiority of genius. The part assigned to Mr. Phelps (Friar Lawrence)

requires an actor of considerable powers, and under the old régime would

have deteriorated nothing from Mr. Phelps’ position; but we can

understand the motives which influenced its rejection, and whilst we

deprecate the practice of actors refusing parts on every caprice, we

consider Mr. Phelps’ opposition to this ruinous system of “starring” as

commendable and manly. The real cause of the decline of the drama is the

upholding of this system. The “stars” are paid so enormously, and cost

so much to maintain them in their false position, that the manager

cannot afford (supposing the disposition to exist) to pay the working

portion of his company salaries commensurate with their usefulness, or

compatible with the appearance they are expected to maintain out of the

theatre; whilst opportunities of testing their powers as actors, or of

improving any favourable impression they may have made upon the public,

is denied to them, from the fear that the influence of the greater,

because more fortunate actor, may be diminished thereby. These facts are

now so well known, that men of education are deterred from making the

stage a profession, and consequently the scarcity of rising actors is

referable to this cause.

The poverty of our present dramatic literature may also be attributable

to this absurd and destructive system. The “star” must be considered

alone in the construction of the drama; or if the piece be not actually

made to measure, the actor, par excellence, must be the arbiter of the

author’s creation. Writers are thus deterred from making experiments in

the higher order of dramatic writing, for should their subject admit of

this individual display, its rejection by the “star” would render the

labour of months valueless, and the dramatist, driven from the path of

fame, degenerates into a literary drudge, receiving for his wearying

labour a lesser remuneration than would be otherwise awarded him, from

the pecuniary monopoly of the “star.”

It is this system which has begotten the present indifference to the

stage. The public had formerly many favourites, because all had an

opportunity of contending for their favour—now they have only Mr. A. or

Mrs. B., who must ultimately weary the public, be their talent what it

may, as the sweetest note would pall upon the ear, were it continually

sounded, although, when harmonised with others, it should constitute the

charm of the melody.

We have made these remarks divested of any personal consideration. We

quarrel only with the system that we believe to be unjust and injurious

to an art which we reverence.

VAUXHALL.—Vauxhall! region of Punch, both liquid and corporeal!—Elysium

of illumination lamps!—Paradise of Simpson!—we have been permitted once

again to breathe your oily atmosphere, to partake of an imaginary repast

of impalpable ham and invisible chicken—to join in the eruption of

exclamations at thy pyrotechnic glories—to swallow thy mysterious arrack

and

A jester wearing a toga PUNCH A LA ROMAINE.

We have seen Jullien, the elegant, pantomimic Jullien, exhibit his six-

inch wristbands and exquisitely dressed head—we have roved again amid

those bowers where, with Araminta Smith, years ago,

“We met the daylight after seven hours’ sitting.”

But we were not happy. There was a something that told us it was not

Vauxhall: the G R’s were V R’s—the cocked hats were round hats—the

fiddlers were foreigners—the Rotunda was Astley’s—the night was moon-

shiny—and there was not—our pen weeps whilst we trace the mournful

fact—there was not “Simpson” to exclaim, “Welcome to the royal

property!” Urbane M.A.C., wouldst that thou hadst been a Mussulman, then

wouldst thou doubtlessly be gliding about amid an Eden of Houris,

uttering to the verge of time the hospitable sentence which has rendered

thy name immortal—Peace to thy manes!

STRAND.—The enterprising managers of this elegant little theatre have

produced another mythological drama, called “The Frolics of the Fairies;

or, the Rose, Shamrock, and Thistle,” from the pen of Leman Rede, who

is, without doubt, the first of this class of writers. The indisposition

of Mr. Hall was stated to be the cause of the delay in the production of

this piece; out, from the appearance of the bills, we are led to infer

that it arose from the indisposition of Mrs. Waylett to shine in the

same hemisphere with that little brilliant, Mrs. Keeley, and “a gem of

the first water” she proved herself to be on Wednesday night. It would

be useless to enter into the detail of the plot of an ephemeron, that

depends more upon its quips and cranks than dramatic construction for

its success. It abounds in merry conceits, which that merriest of—dare

we call her mere woman?—little Mrs. Bob rendered as pointed as a

Whitechapel needle of the finest temper. The appointments and

arrangements of the stage reflect the highest credit on the management,

and the industry which can labour to surmount the difficulties which we

know to exist in the production of anything like scenic effect in the

Strand Theatre, deserve the encouragement which we were gratified to see

bestowed upon this little Temple of Momus.

The Olympic Theatre has obtained an extension of its licence from the

Lord Chamberlain, and will shortly open with a company selected from

Ducrow’s late establishment; but whether the peds are bi or quadru,

rumour sayeth not.

A CARD. MESSRS. FUDGE and VAMP beg to inform novelists and writers of

tales in general, that they supply dénouements to unfinished stories, on

the most reasonable terms. They have just completed a large stock of

catastrophes, to which they respectfully solicit attention.

FOR MELO-DRAMA. Discovery of the real murderers, and respite of the

accused.

Ditto very superior, with return of the supposed victim.

Ditto, ditto, extra superfine, with punishment of vice and reward of

virtue.

FOR FARCES. Mollification of flinty-hearted fathers and union of lovers,

&c. &c. &c.

FOR COMEDIES. Fictitious bankruptcy of the hero, and sudden

reinstatement of fortune.

Ditto, ditto, with exposure of false friends.

Non-recognition of son by father, ultimate discovery of former by

latter.

Ditto, ditto, very fine, “with convenient cordial,” and true gentlemen,

illustrated by an old debauchee.

N.B.—On hand, a very choice assortment of interesting parricides,

strongly recommended for Surrey use.

WHY AND BECAUSE. Young Kean’s a bad cigar—because

The more he’s puff’d, the worse he draws.

A new farce, entitled “My Friend the Captain,” is to be produced

tonight, at the Haymarket Theatre.

MR. HAMMOND will take a benefit at the English Opera House, on Monday

next. We are happy to see that this very deserving actor’s professional

brethren are coming forward to lend him that assistance which he has

always been ready to afford to others.

TO MRS. H. Thou sweet, to whom all bend the knee,

No wonder men run after thee;

There’s something in a name, perhaps,

For Honey’s often good for chaps.

A MR. GRAHAM has appeared at the Surrey. He is reported to be a very

chaste and clever actor. If so, he certainly will not suit the taste of

Mr. Davidge’s patrons. How they have tolerated Wilson, Leffler, and Miss

Romer so long, we are utterly at a loss to divine. It must be, that

“music hath charms.”

We are authorised to state that Rouse of the Eagle Tavern is not the

Rous who was lately returned for Westminster.

THE REAL AND THE IDEAL; OR, THE CATASTROPHE OF A VICTORIA MELO-DRAMA.

Berthelda.—Sanguine, you have killed your mother!!!

Fruitwoman.—Any apples, oranges, biscuits, ginger-beer!

(Curtain falls.)

QUALIFICATIONS FOR AN M.P. We give the following list of qualifications

for a member of parliament for Westminster, as a logical curiosity,

extracted from a handbill very liberally distributed by Captain Rons’s

party, during the late contest:—

1st. Because “he is brother to the Earl of Stradbroke.”

2nd. Because “his family have always been hearty Conservatives.”

3rd. Because “they have been established in Suffolk from the time of the

Heptarchy.”

4th. Because “he entered the navy in 1808.”

5th. Because “he brought home Lord Aylmer in the Pique, in 1835.”

6th. Because “he ran the Pique aground in the Straits of Belleisle.”

7th. Because “after beating there for eleven hours, he got her off

again.”

8th. Because “he brought her into Portsmouth without a rudder or

forefoot, lower-masts all sprung, and leaking at the rate of two feet

per hour!” ergo, he is the fittest man for the representative of

Westminster.—Q.E.D.

THE ENTIRE ANIMAL. LORD LONDONDERRY, in a letter to Colonel Fitzroy,

begs of the gallant member to “go the whole hog.” This is natural advice

from a thorough bore like his lordship.

PUNCH, OR THE LONDON CHARIVARI. VOL. 1. [pg 13] JULY 24, 1841. A MODEST

METHOD OF FORMING A NEW BUDGET SO AS TO PROVIDE FOR THE DEFICIENCY OF

THE REVENUE. A building (with the words More Ton Dyer) and a sail

forming the letter P oor Mr. Dyer! And so this gentleman has been

dismissed from the commission of the peace for humanely endeavouring to

obtain the release of Medhurst from confinement. Two or three thousand

pounds, he thought, given to some public charity, might persuade the

Home Secretary to remit the remainder of his sentence, and dispose the

public to look upon the prisoner with an indulgent eye.

Now, Mr. Punch, incline thy head, and let me whisper a secret into thine

ear. If the Whig ministry had not gone downright mad with the result of

the elections, instead of dismissing delectable Dyer, they would have

had him down upon the Pension List to such a tune as you wot not of,

although of tunes you are most curiously excellent. For, oh! what a

project did he unwittingly shadow forth of recruiting the exhausted

budget! Such a one as a sane Chancellor of the Exchequer would have

seized upon, and shaken in the face of “Robert the Devil,” and his crew

of “odious monopolists.” Peel must still have pined in hopeless

opposition, when Baring opened his plan.

Listen! Mandeville wrote a book, entitled “Private Vices Public

Benefits.” Why cannot public crimes, let me ask, be made so? you,

perhaps, are not on the instant prepared with an answer—but I am.

Let the Chancellor of the Exchequer forthwith prepare to discharge all

the criminals in Great Britain, of whatever description, from her

respective prisons, on the payment of a certain sum, to be regulated on

the principle of a graduated or “sliding scale.”

A vast sum will be thus instantaneously raised,—not enough, however, you

will say, to supply the deficiency. I know it. But a moment’s further

attention. Mr. Goulburn, many years since, being then Chancellor of the

Exchequer, and, like brother Baring, in a financial hobble, proposed

that on the payment, three years in advance, of the dog and hair-powder

tax, all parties so handsomely coming down with the “tin,” should

henceforth and for ever rejoice in duty-free dog, and enjoy untaxed

cranium. Now, why not a proposition to this effect—that on the payment

of a good round sum (let it be pretty large, for the ready is required),

a man shall be exempt from the present legal consequences of any crime

or crimes he may hereafter commit; or, if this be thought an extravagant

scheme, and not likely to take with the public, at least let a list of

prices be drawn up, that a man may know, at a glance, at what cost he

may gratify a pet crime or favourite little foible. Thus:—

For cutting one’s own child’s head off—so much. (I really think I would

fix this at a high price, although I am well aware it has been done for

nothing.)

For murdering a father or a mother—a good sum.

For ditto, a grand ditto, or a great-grand ditto—not so much: their

leases, it is presumed, being about to fall in.

Uncles, aunts, cousins, friends, companions, and the community in

general—in proportion.

The cost of assaults and batteries, and other diversions, might be

easily arranged; only I must remark, that for assaulting policemen I

would charge high; that being, like the Italian Opera, for the most

part, the entertainment of the nobility.

You may object that the propounding such a scheme would be

discreditable, and that the thing is unprecedented. Reflect, my dear

PUNCH, for an instant. Surely, nothing can be deemed to be discreditable

by a Whig government, after the cheap sugar, cheap timber, cheap bread

rigs. Why, this is just what might have been expected from them. I

wonder they had not hit upon it. How it would have “agitated the

masses!”

As to the want of a precedent, that is easily supplied. Pardons for all

sorts and sizes of crimes were commonly bought and sold in the reign of

James I.; nay, pardon granted in anticipation of crimes to be at a

future time committed.

After all, you see, Mr. Dyer’s idea was not altogether original.

Your affectionate friend, CHRISTOPHER SLY. Pump Court.

P.S.—Permit me to congratulate you on the determination you have come

to, of entering the literary world. Your modesty may be alarmed, but I

must tell you that several of our “popular and talented” authors are

commonly thought to be greatly indebted to you. They are said to derive

valuable hints from you, particularly in their management of the

pathetic.

Keep a strict eye upon your wife, Judith. You say she will superintend

your notices of the fashions, &c.; but I fear she has been already too

long and exclusively employed on certain newspapers and other

periodicals. Her style is not easily mistaken.

WHIG-WAGGERIES. The Whigs must go: to reign instead

The Tories will be call’d;

The Whigs should ne’er be at the head—

Dear me, I’m getting bald!

The Whigs! they pass’d that Poor Law Bill;

That’s true, beyond a doubt;

The poor they’ve treated very ill—

There, kick that beggar out!

The Whigs about the sugar prate!

They do not care one dump

About the blacks and their sad state—

Just please to pass the lump!

Those niggers, for their sufferings here,

Will angels be when dying;

Have wings, and flit above us—dear—

Why, how those blacks are flying!

The Whigs are in a state forlorn;

In fact, were ne’er so low:

They make a fuss about the corn—

My love, you’re on my toe!

The Whigs the timber duty say

They will bring down a peg;

More wooden-pated blockheads they!

Fetch me my wooden leg!

COURT CIRCULAR. Deaf Burke took an airing yesterday afternoon in an open

cart. He was accompanied by Jerry Donovan. They afterwards stood up out

of the rain under the piazzas in Covent Garden. In the evening they

walked through the slops.

The dinner at the Harp, yesterday, was composed of many delicacies of

the season, including bread-and-cheese and onions. The hilarity of the

evening was highly increased by the admirable style in which Signor

Jonesi sang “Nix my dolly pals.”

Despatches yesterday arrived at the house of Reuben Martin, enclosing a

post order for three-and six-pence.

The Signor and Deaf Burke walked out at five o’clock. They after wards

tossed for a pint of half-and-half.

Jerry Donovan and Bill Paul were seen in close conversation yesterday.

It is rumoured that the former is in treaty with the latter for a pair

of left-off six-and-eightpenny Clarences.

Paddy Green intends shortly to remove to a three-pair back-room in

Little Wild-street, Drury-lane, which he has taken for the summer. His

loss will be much felt in the neighbourhood.

AN AN-TEA ANACREONTIC.—No. 2. Rundell! pride of Ludgate Hill!

I would task thine utmost skill;

I would have a bowl from thee

Fit to hold my Howqua tea.

And oh! leave it not without

Ivory handle and a spout.

Where thy curious hand must trace

Father Mathew’s temperate face,

So that he may ever seem

Spouting tea and breathing steam.

On its sides do not display

Fawns and laughing nymphs at play

But portray, instead of these,

Funny groups of fat Chinese:

On its lid a mandarin,

Modelled to resemble Lin.

When completed, artisan,

I will pay you—if I can.

[pg 14] SPORTING. THE KNOCKER HUNT. On Thursday, July 8, 1841, the

celebrated pack of Knocker Boys met at the Cavendish, in Jermyn Street.

These animals, which have acquired for themselves a celebrity as undying

as that of Tom and Jerry, are of a fine powerful breed, and in excellent

condition. The success which invariably attends them must be highly

gratifying to the distinguished nobleman who, if he did not introduce

this particular species into the metropolis, has at least done much to

bring it to its present extraordinary state of perfection.

As there may be some of our readers who are ignorant of the purposes for

which this invaluable pack has been organised, it may be as well to

state a few particulars, before proceeding to the detail of one of the

most splendid nights upon record in the annals of disorderism.

The knocker is a thing which is generally composed of brass or iron. It

has frequently a violent resemblance to the “human face divine,” or the

ravenous expressiveness of a beast of prey. It assumes a variety of

phases under peculiar vinous influences. A gentleman, in whose veracity

and experience we have the most unlimited confidence, for a series of

years kept an account of the phenomena of his own knocker; and by his

permission the following extracts are now submitted to the public:—

1840.

Nov. 12—Dined with Captain ——. Capital spread—exquisite

liqueurs—magnificent wines—unparalleled cigars—drank my four

bottles—should have made it five, but found I had eaten something which

disagreed with me—Home at four.

State of Knocker.—Jumping up and down the surface of the door like a

rope dancer, occasionally diverging into a zig-zag, the key-hole

partaking of the same eccentricities.

Nov. 13.—Supped with Charley B——. Brandy, genuine cognac—Cigars

principè. ESTIMATED CONSUMPTION: brandy and water, eighteen

glasses—cigars, two dozen—porter with a cabman, two pots.

State of Knocker.—Peripatetic—moved from our house to the next—remained

till it roused the family—returned to its own door, and became

duplicated—wouldn’t wake the house-porter till five.

N.B. Found I had used my own thumb for a sounding-plate, and had bruised

my nail awfully.

Nov. 14.—Devoted the day to soda-water and my tailor’s bill—gave a

draught for the amount, and took another on my own account.

Nov. 15.—Lectured by the “governor”—left the house savage—met the

Marquess—got very drunk unconsciously—fancied myself a merman, and that

the gutter in the Haymarket was the Archipelago—grew preposterous, and

felt that I should like to be run over—thought I was waltzing with

Cerito, but found I was being carried on a stretcher to the station-

house—somebody sent somewhere for bail, and somebody bailed me.

State of Knocker.—Very indistinct—then became uncommonly like the

“governor” in his nightcap—could NOT reach it—presume it was filial

affection that prevented me—knocked of its own accord, no doubt agitated

by sympathy—reverberated in my ears all night, and left me with a

confounded head-ache in the morning.

The above examples are sufficient to show the variability of this

singular article.

Formerly the knocker was devoted entirely to the menial occupation of

announcing, by a single dab, or a variation of raps, the desire of

persons on the door-step to communicate with the occupants of the

interior of a mansion. Modern genius has elevated it into a source of

refined pleasure and practical humour, affording at the same time

employment to the artisan, excitement to the gentleman, and broken heads

and dislocations of every variety to the police!

We will now proceed to the details of an event which PUNCH alone is

worthy to record:—

Notice of a meet having been despatched to all the members of the

“Knocker Hunt,” a splendid field—no street—met at the Cavendish—the

hotel of the hospitable Marquess. The white damask which covered the

mahogany was dotted here and there with rich and invigorating viands;

whilst decanters of port and sherry—jugs of Chateau Margaux—bottles of

exhilarating spirits, and boxes of cigars, agreeably diversified the

scene. After a plentiful but orderly discussion of the “creature

comforts,” (for all ebullitions at home are strictly prohibited by the

Marquess) it was proposed to draw St. James’s Square. This suggestion

was, however, abandoned, as it was reported by Captain Pepperwell, that

a party of snobs had been hunting bell-handles in the same locality, on

the preceding night. Clarges Street was then named; and off we started

in that direction, trying the west end of Jermyn Street and Piccadilly

in our way; but, as was expected, both coverts proved blank. We were

almost afraid of the same result in the Clarges Street gorse; for it was

not until we arrived at No. 33, that any one gave tongue. Young Dashover

was the first, and clearly and beautifully came his shrill tone upon the

ear, as he exclaimed “Hereth a knocker—thuch a one, too!” The rush was

instantaneous; and in the space of a moment one feeling seemed to have

taken possession of the whole pack. A more splendid struggle was never

witnessed by the oldest knocker-hunter! A more pertinacious piece of

cast-iron never contended against the prowess of the Corinthian! After a

gallant pull of an hour and a half, “the affair came off,” and now

graces the club-room of the “Knocker Hunt.”

The pack having been called off, were taken to the kennel in the

Haymarket, when one young dog, who had run counter at a bell-handle, was

found to be missing; but the gratifying intelligence was soon brought,

that he was safe in the Vine-street station-house.

The various compounds known as champagne, port, sherry, brandy, &c.,

having been very freely distributed, Captain Pepperwell made a

proposition that will so intimately connect his name with that of the

immortal Marquess, that, like the twin-born of Jupiter and Leda, to

mention one will be to imply the other.

Having obtained silence by throwing a quart measure at the waiter, he

wriggled himself into an upright position, and in a voice tremulous from

emotion—perhaps brandy, said—

“Gentlemen of—the Knocker Hunt—there are times when a man can’t make—a

speech without con-considerable inconvenience to himself—that’s my case

at the present moment—but my admiration for the distinguished foun—der

of the Knocker Hunt—compels me—to stand as well as I can—and propose,

that as soon as we have knockers enough—they be melted down—by some

other respectable founder, and cast into a statue of—the Marquess of

Waterford!”

Deafening were the cheers which greeted the gallant captain! A meeting

of ladies has since been held, at which resolutions were passed for the

furtherance of so desirable an object, and a committee formed for the

selection of a design worthy of the originator of the Knocker Hunt. To

that committee we now appeal.

A statue of a gentleman holding a lion-faced door-knocker in the air. TO

HENRY, MARQUESS OF WATERFORD, AND HIS JOLLY COMPANIONS IN LOWE, THIS

STATUE OF ACHILLES, CAST FROM KNOCKERS TAKEN IN THE VICINITIES OF

SACKVILLE-STREET, VIGO-LANE, AND WATERLOO-PLACE, IS INSCRIBED BY THEIR

GENTLEWOMEN. PLACED ON THIS SPOT ON THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL, MDCCCXLII.

BY COMMAND OF COLONEL ROWAN.

Mem. The hunt meet again on Monday next, as information has been

received that a splendid knocker occupies the door of Laing’s shooting

gallery in the Haymarket.

[pg 15] STENOTYPOGRAPHY. Our printer’s devil, with a laudable anxiety

for our success, has communicated the following pathetic story. As a

specimen of stenotypography, or compositor’s short-hand, we consider it

unique.

SERAPHINA POPPS; OR, THE BEAUTY OF BLOOMSBURY. Seraphina Popps was the

daughter of Mr. Hezekiah Popps, a highly respectable pawnbroker,

residing in —— Street, Bloomsbury. Being an only child, from her

earliest infancy she wanted for 0, as everything had been made ready to

her hand hand.

She grew up as most little girls do, who live long enough, and became

the universal !1 of all who knew her, for

“None but herself could be her ||.”2

Amongst the most devoted of her admirers was Julian Fitzorphandale.

Seraphina was not insensible to the worth of Julian Fitzorphandale; and

when she received from him a letter, asking permission to visit her, she

felt some difficulty in replying to his ?3; for, at this very critical

.4, an unamiable young man, named Augustus St. Tomkins, who possessed

considerable £. s. d. had become a suitor for her hand. She loved

Fitzorphandale +5 St. Tomkins, but the former was ? of money; and

Seraphina, though sensitive to an extreme, was fully aware that a

competency was a very comfortable “appendix.”

She seized her pen, but found that her mind was all 6’s and 7’s. She

spelt Fitzorphandale, P-h-i-t-z; and though she commenced ¶6 after ¶,

she never could come to a “finis.” She upbraided her unlucky * *, either

for making Fitzorphandale so poor, or St. Tomkins so ugly, which he

really was. In this dilemma we must leave her at present.

Although Augustus St. Tomkins was a Freemason7, he did not possess the

universal benevolence which that ancient order inculcates; but revolving

in his mind the probable reasons for Seraphina’s hesitation, he came to

this conclusion: she either loved him -8 somebody else, or she did not

love him at all. This conviction only ×9 his worst feelings, and he

resolved that no ??10 of conscience should stand between him and his

desires.

On the following day, Fitzorphandale had invited Seraphina to a pic-nic

party. He had opened the &11 placed some boiled beef and ^^12 on the

verdant grass, when Seraphina exclaimed, in the mildest ``´´13, “I like

it well done, Fitzorphandale!”

As Julian proceeded to supply his beloved one with a §14 of the

provender, St. Tomkins stood before them with a †15 in his hand.

Want of space compels us to leave the conclusion of this interesting

romance to the imagination of the reader, and to those ingenious

playwrights who so liberally supply our most popular authors with

gratuitous catastrophes.

NOTES BY THE FLY-BOY. 1. Admiration. 2. Parallel. 3. Note of

Interrogation. 4. Period. 5. More than. 6. Paragraph. 7. Freemason. 8.

Less than. 9. Multiplied. 10. Scruples. 11. Hampers-and. 12. Carets. 13.

Accents. 14. Section. 15. Dagger. NEWS OF EXTRAORDINARY INTEREST. A

mechanic in Berlin has invented a balance of extremely delicate

construction. Sir Robert Peel, it is said, intends to avail himself of

the invention, to keep his political principles so nicely balanced

between Whig and Tory, that the most accurate observer shall be unable

to tell which way they tend.

The London Fire Brigade have received directions to hold themselves in

readiness at the meeting of Parliament, to extinguish any conflagration

that may take place, from the amazing quantity of inflammatory speeches

and political fireworks that will be let off by the performers on both

sides of the house.

The following extraordinary inducement was held out by a solicitor, who

advertised last week in a morning paper, for an office-clerk; “A small

salary will be given, but he will have enough of over-work to make up

for the deficiency.”

“MORE WAYS THAN ONE,” &c. The incomplete state of the Treasury has been

frequently lamented by all lovers of good taste. We are happy to

announce that a tablet is about to be placed in the front of the

building, with the following inscription:—

TREASURY.

FINISHED BY THE WIGS,

ANNO DOM. MDCCCXLI.

A CON. BY TOM COOKE. Why is the common chord in music like a portion of

the Mediterranean?—Because it’s the E G & C (Ægean Sea).

Silhouette of a conductor holding a blunt object MONSIEUR JULLIEN.

“One!”—crash!

“Two!”—clash!

“Three!”—dash!

“Four!”—smash!

Diminuendo,

Now crescendo:—

Thus play the furious band,

Led by the kid-gloved hand

Of Jullien—that Napoleon of quadrille,

Of Piccolo-nians shrillest of the shrill;

Perspiring raver

Over a semi-quaver;

Who tunes his pipes so well, he’ll tell you that

The natural key of Johnny Bull’s—A flat.

Demon of discord, with mustaches cloven—

Arch impudent improver of Beethoven—

Tricksy professor of charlatanerie—

Inventor of musical artillery—

Barbarous rain and thunder maker—

Unconscionable money taker—

Travelling about both near and far,

Toll to exact at every bar—

What brings thee here again,

To desecrate old Drury’s fane?

Egregious attitudiniser!

Antic fifer! com’st to advise her

’Gainst intellect and sense to close her walls?

To raze her benches,

That Gallic wenches

Might play their brazen antics at masked balls?

Ci-devant waiter

Of a quarante-sous traiteur,

Why did you leave your stew-pans and meat-oven,

To make a fricassee of the great Beet-hoven?

And whilst your piccolos unceasing squeak on,

Saucily serve Mozart with sauce-piquant;

Mawkishly cast your eyes to the cerulean—

Turn Matthew Locke to potage à la julienne!

Go! go! sir, do,

Back to the rue,

Where lately you

Waited upon each hungry feeder,

Playing the garçon, not the leader.

Pray, put your hat on,

Coupez votre bâton.

Bah

Va!!

CLAR’ DE KITCHEN. It is now pretty well understood, that if the Tories

come into office, there will be a regular turn out of the present royal

household. Her Majesty, through the gracious condescension of the new

powers, will be permitted to retain her situation in the royal

establishment, but on the express condition that there shall be—

A fashionable couple being tailed by a pair of gentlemen NO FOLLOWERS

ALLOWED.

A PARTY OF MEDALLERS. A subscription has been opened for a medal to

commemorate the return of Lord John Russell for the city of London. We

would suggest that his speech to the citizens against the corn-laws

would form an appropriate inscription for the face of the medal, while

that to the Huntingdonshire farmers in favour of them would be found

just the thing for the reverse.

[pg 16] A CHAPTER ON BOOTS. “Boots? Boots!” Yes, Boots! we can write

upon boots—we can moralise upon boots; we can convert them, as Jacques

does the weeping stag in “As You Like It,” (or, whether you like it or

not,) into a thousand similes. First, for—but, “our sole’s in arms and

eager for the fray,” and so we will at once head our dissertation as we

would a warrior’s host with

WELLINGTONS. A leg wearing a Wellington boot These are the most

judicious species of manufactured calf-skin; like their great

“godfather,” they are perfect as a whole; from the binding at the top to

the finish at the toe, there is a beautiful unity about their well-

conceived proportions: kindly considerate of the calf, amiably inclined

to the instep, and devotedly serviceable to the whole foot, they shed

their protecting influence over all they encase. They are walked about

in not only as protectors of the feet, but of the honour of the wearer.

Quarrel with a man if you like, let your passion get its steam up even

to blood-heat, be magnificent while glancing at your adversary’s Brutus,

grand as you survey his chin, heroic at the last button of his

waistcoat, unappeased at the very knees of his superior kersey

continuations, inexorable at the commencement of his straps, and about

to become abusive at his shoe-ties, the first cooler of your wrath will

be the Hoby-like arched instep of his genuine Wellingtons, which, even

as a drop of oil upon the troubled ocean, will extend itself over the

heretofore ruffled surface of your temper.—Now for

BLUCHERS. A leg wearing a Blucher Well, we don’t like them. They are

shocking impostors—walking discomforts! They had no right to be made at

all; or, if made, ‘twas a sin for them to be so christened (are Bluchers

Christians?).

They are Wellingtons cut down; so, in point of genius, was their

baptismal sponsor: but these are vilely tied, and that the hardy old

Prussian would never have been while body and soul held together. He was

no beauty, but these are decidedly ugly commodities, chiefly tenanted by

swell purveyors of cat’s-meat, and burly-looking prize-fighters. They

have the fortiter in re for kicking, but not the suaviter in modo for

corns. Look at them villanously treed out at the “Noah’s Ark” and

elsewhere; what are they but eight-and-six-penny worth of discomfort!

They will no more accommodate a decent foot than the old general would

have turned his back in a charge, or cut off his grizzled mustachios. If

it wasn’t for the look of the thing, one might as well shove one’s foot

into a box-iron. We wouldn’t be the man that christened them, and take a

trifle to meet the fighting old marshal, even in a world of peace; in

short, they are ambulating humbugs, and the would-be respectables that

wear ‘em are a huge fraternity of “false pretenders.” Don’t trust ‘em,

reader; they are sure to do you! there’s deceit in their straps,

prevarication in their trousers, and connivance in their distended

braces. We never met but one exception to the above rule—it was John

Smith. Every reader has a friend of the name of John Smith—in

confidence, that is the man. We would have sworn by him; in fact, we did

swear by him, for ten long years he was our oracle. Never shall we

forget the first, the only time our faith was shaken. We gazed upon and

loved his honest face; we reciprocated the firm pressure of his manly

grasp; our eyes descended in admiration even unto the ground on which he

stood, and there, upon that very ground—the ground whose upward growth

of five feet eight seemed Heaven’s boast, an “honest man”—we saw what

struck us sightless to all else—a pair of Bluchers!

We did not dream his feet were in them; ten years’ probation seemed to

vanish at the sight!—we wept! He spoke—could we believe our ears?

“Marvel of marvels!” despite the propinquity of the Bluchers, despite

their wide-spreading contamination, his voice was unaltered. We were

puzzled! we were like the first farourite when “he has a leg,” or, “a

LEG has him,” i.e., nowhere!

John Smith coughed, not healthily, as of yore; it was a hollow emanation

from hypocritical lungs: he sneezed; it was a vile imitation of his

original “hi-catch-yew!” he invited us to dinner, suggested the best cut

of a glorious haunch—we had always had it in the days of the

Wellingtons—now our imagination conjured up cold plates, tough mutton,

gravy thick enough in grease to save the Humane Society the trouble of

admonitory advertisements as to the danger of reckless young gentlemen

skating thereon, and a total absence of sweet sauce and currant-jelly.

We paused—we grieved—John Smith saw it—he inquired the cause—we felt for

him, but determined, with Spartan fortitude, to speak the truth. Our

native modesty and bursting heart caused our drooping eyes once more to

scan the ground, and, next to the ground, the wretched Bluchers. But,

joy of joys! we saw them all! ay, all!—all—from the seam in the sides to

the leech-like fat cotton-ties. We counted the six lace-holes; we

examined the texture of the stockings above, “curious three-thread”—we

gloated over the trousers uncontaminated by straps, we hugged ourselves

in the contemplation of the naked truth.

John Smith—our own John Smith—your John Smith—everybody’s John

Smith—again entered the arm-chair of our affections, the fire of our

love stirred, like a self-acting poker, the embers of cooling good

fellowship, and the strong blaze of resuscitated friendship burst forth

with all its pristine warmth. John Smith wore Bluchers but he wore them

like an honest man; and he was the only specimen of the genus homo (who

sported trowsers) that was above the weakness of tugging up his

suspenders and stretching his broadcloth for the contemptible purpose of

giving a fictitious, Wellingtonian appearance to his eight-and-

sixpennies.

ANKLE-JACKS, A leg wearing an Ankle-Jack to indulge in the sporting

phraseology of the Racing Calendar, appear to be “got by Highlows out of

Bluchers.” They thrive chiefly in the neighbourhoods of Houndsditch,

Whitechapel, and Billingsgate. They attach themselves principally to

butchers’ boys, Israelitish disposers of vix and pinthils, and itinerant

misnomers of “live fish.” On their first introduction to their masters,

by prigging or purchase, they represent some of the glories of “Day and

Martin;” but, strange to say, though little skilled in the penman’s art,

their various owners appear to be imbued with extraordinary veneration

for the wholesome advice contained in the round-text copy, wherein

youths are admonished to “avoid useless repetition,” hence that polish

is the Alpha and Omega of their shining days. Their term of servitude

varies from three to six weeks: during the first they are fastened to

the topmost of their ten holes; the next fortnight, owing to the

breaking of the lace, and its frequent knotting, they are shorn of half

their glories, and upon the total destruction of the thong (a thing

never replaced), it appears a matter of courtesy on their parts to

remain on at all. On some occasions various of their wearers have

transferred them as a legacy to very considerable mobs, without

particularly stating for which especial individual they were intended.

This kicking off their shoes “because they wouldn’t die in them,” has

generally proved but a sorry method of lengthening existence.

HESSIANS, A leg modelling a Hessian boot are little more than ambitious

Wellingtons, curved at the top—wrinkled at the bottom (showing symptoms

of superannuation even in their infancy), and betasselled in the front,

offering what a Wellington never did—a weak point for an enemy to seize

and shake at his pleasure.

There’s no “speculation” in them—they are entirely superficial: like a

shallow fellow, you at once see through, and know all about them. There

is no mystery as to the height they reach, how far they are polished, or

the description of leg they cling round. Save Count D’Oraay, we never

saw a calf in a pair of them—that is, we never saw a leg with a calf.

Their general tenants are speculative Jew clothesmen who have bought

them “vorth the monish” (at tenth hand), seedy chamber counsel, or still

more seedy collectors of rents. They are fast falling into decay; like

dogs, they have had their “Day (and Martin’s”) Acts, but both are past.

But woh! ho!

TOPS! TOPS!! TOPS!!! A booted leg in a stirrup with spurs

Derby!—Epsom!—Ledger!—Spring Summer, Autumn Meetings—Miles, Half-

miles—T.Y.C.—Hurdles, Heats, names, weights, colours of the

riders—jockies, jackets,—Dead

Heats—sweats—distances—trainings—scales—caps, and all—what would you be

without Top Boots? What! and echo answers—nothing!

Ay, worse than nothing—a chancery suit without money—an Old Bailey

culprit without an alibi—a debtor without an excuse—a new play without a

titled author—a manager without impudence—a thief without a character—a

lawyer without a wig—or a Guy Faux without matches!

Tops, you must be “made to measure.” Wellingtons, Hessians, Bluchers,

Ankle-Jacks, and Highlows, can be chosen from, fitted, and tried on; but

you must be measured for, lasted, back-strapped, top’d, wrinkled and

bottomed, according to order.

So it is with your proprietors—the little men who ride the great running

horses. There’s an impenetrable mystery about those little men—they are,

we know that, but we know not how. Bill Scott is in the secret—Chifney

is well aware of it—John Day could enlighten the world—but they won’t!

They know the value of being “light characters”—their fame is as “a

feather,” and downey are they, even as the illustration of that fame.

They conspire together like so many little Frankensteins. The world is

treated with a very small proportion of very small jockeys; they never

increase beyond a certain number, which proves they are not born in the

regular way: as the old ones drop off, the young ones just fill their

places, and not one to spare. Whoever heard of a “mob of jockeys,” a

glut of “light-weights,” or even a handful of “feathers?”—no one!

It’s like Freemasonry—it’s an awful mystery! Bill Scott knows all about

the one, and the Duke of Sussex knows all about the other, but the

uninitiated know nothing of either! Jockeys are wonders—so are their

boots! Crickets have as much calf, grasshoppers as much ostensible

thigh; and yet these superhuman specimens of manufactured leather fit

like a glove, and never pull the little gentlemen’s legs off. That’s the

extraordinary part of it; they never even so much as dislocate a joint!

Jockey bootmakers are wonderful men! Jockeys ain’t men at all!

Look, look, look! Oh, dear! do you see that little fellow, with his

merry-thought-like looking legs, clinging round that gallant bright

chesnut, thoro’bred, and sticking to his ribs as if he meant to crimp

him for the dinner of some gourmand curious in horse-flesh! There he is,

screwing his sharp knees into the saddle, sitting well up from his

loins, stretching his neck, curving his back, stiffening the wire-like

muscles of his small arms, [pg 17]and holding in the noble brute he

strides, as a saftey-valve controls the foaming steam; only loosing him

at his very pleasure.

Look, look! there’s the grey filly, with the other made-to-measure

feather on her back; do you notice how she has crawled up to the

chesnut? Mark, mark! his arms appear to be India-rubber! Mercy on us,

how they stretch! and the bridle, which looked just now like a solid bar

of wrought iron, begins to curve! See how gently he leans over the

filly’s neck; while the chesnut’s rider turns his eyes, like a boiled

lobster, almost to the back of his head! Oh, he’s awake! he still keeps

the lead: but the grey filly is nothing but a good ‘un. Now, the Top-

boots riding her have become excited, and commence tickling her sides

with their flashing silver spurs, putting an extra foot into every

bound. She gains upon the chesnut! This is something like a race! The

distance-post is reached! The Top-boots on the grey are at work again.

Bravo! the tip of the white nose is beyond the level of the opposing

boots! Ten strides, and no change! “She must win!” “No, she can’t!”

“Grey for ever!” “Chesnut for a hundred!” “Done!

done!”—Magnificent!—neck and neck!—splendid!—any body’s race! Bravo

grey!—bravo chesnut!—bravo both! Ten yards will settle it. The chesnut

rider throws up his arms—a slight dash of blood soils the “Day and

Martin”—an earth-disdaining bound lands chesnut a winner of three

thousand guineas! and all the world are in raptures with the judgment

displayed in the last kick of the little man’s TOP BOOTS.

FUSBOS.

HINTS ON MELO-DRAMATIC MUSIC. It has often struck us forcibly that the

science of melo-dramatic music has been hitherto very imperfectly

understood amongst us. The art of making “the sound an echo of the

sense”—of expressing, by orchestral effects, the business of the drama,

and of forming a chromatic commentary to the emotions of the soul and

the motions of the body, has been shamefully neglected on the English

stage. Ignorant composers and ignoble fiddlers have attempted to develop

the dark mysteries and intricate horrors of the melo-drama; but unable

to cope with the grandeur of their subject, they have been betrayed into

the grossest absurdities. What, for instance, could be more preposterous

than to assign the same music for “storming a fort,” and “stabbing a

virtuous father!” Equally ridiculous would it be to express “the

breaking of the sun through a fog,” and “a breach of promise of

marriage;” or the “rising of a ghost,” and the “entrance of a lady’s

maid,” in the same keys.

The adaptation of the different instruments in the orchestra to the

circumstance of the drama, is also a matter of extreme importance. How

often has the effect of a highly-interesting suicide been destroyed by

an injudicious use of the trombone; and a scene of domestic distress

been rendered ludicrous by the intervention of the double-drum!

If our musical composers would attend more closely than they have been

in the habit of doing, to the minutiæ of the scene which is intrusted to

them to illustrate, and study the delicate lights and shades of human

nature, as we behold it nightly on the Surrey stage, we might

confidently hope, at no very distant period, to see melo-drama take the

lofty position it deserves in the histrionic literature of this country.

We feel that there is a wide field here laid open for the exercise of

British talent, and have therefore, made a few desultory mems. on the

subject, which we subjoin; intended as modest hints for the guidance of

composers of melodramatic music. The situations we have selected from

the most popular Melos. of the day; the music to be employed in each

instance, we have endeavoured to describe in such a manner as to render

it intelligible to all our readers.

Music for the entrance of a brigand in the dark, should be slow and

mysterious, with an effective double bass in it.

Ditto, for taking wine—an allegro, movement, with da capo for the second

glass.

Ditto, for taking porter, beer, or any other inferior swipes—a similar

movement, but not con spirito.

Ditto, for the entrance of an attorney—a coda in one sharp, 6-8 time. If

accompanied by a client, an accidental flat may be introduced.

Ditto, for discovering a lost babby—a simply affettuoso strain, in a

minor key.

Ditto, for recognising a disguised count—a flourish of trumpets, and

three bars rest, to allow time for the countess to faint in his arms.

Ditto, for concealing a lover in a closet, and the sudden appearance of

the father, guardian, or husband, as the case may be—a prestissimo

movement, with an agitated cadenza.

Ditto, for taking an oath or affidavit—slow, solemn music, with a marked

emphasis when the deponent kisses the book.

Ditto, for a lover’s vow—a tender, broken adagio.

Ditto, for kicking a low comedy man—a brisk rapid stoccato passage, with

a running accompaniment on the kettle-drums.

The examples we have given above will sufficiently explain our views;

but there are a vast number of dramatic situations that we have not

noticed, which might be expressed by harmonious sounds, such as music

for the appearance of a dun or a devil—music for paying a tailor—music

for serving a writ—music for an affectionate embrace—music for ditto,

very warm—music for fainting—music for coming-to—music for the death of

a villain, with a confession of bigamy; and many others “too numerous to

mention;” but we trust from what we have said, that the subject will not

be lost sight of by those interested in the elevation of our national

drama.

THE RISING SUN. The residence of Sir Robert Peel has been so besieged of

late by place-hunters, that it has been aptly termed the New Post

Office.

THE PUNCH CORRESPONDENCE. In presenting the following epistle to my

readers, it may be necessary to apprise them, that it is the genuine

production of my eldest daughter, Julia, who has lately obtained the

situation of lady’s-maid in the house of Mr. Samuel Briggs, an

independent wax and tallow-chandler, of Fenchurch-street, City, but who

keeps his family away from business, in fashionable style, in Russell-

square, Bloomsbury. The example of many of our most successful literary

chiffonniers, who have not thought it disgraceful to publish scraps of

private history and unedited scandal, picked up by them in the houses to

which they happened to be admitted, will, it is presumed, sufficiently

justify my daughter in communicating, for the amusement of an

enlightened public, and the benefit of an affectionate parent, a few

circumstances connected with Briggs’ family, with such observations and

reflections of her own as would naturally suggest themselves to a

refined and intelligent mind. Should this first essay of a timid girl in

the thorny path of literature be favourably received by my friends and

patrons, it will stimulate her to fresh exertions; and, I fondly hope,

may be the means of placing her name in the same rank by those of Lady

Morgan, Madame Tussaud, Mrs. Glasse, the Invisible Lady, and other

national ornaments of the feminine species.—[PUNCH. Russl Squear, July

14.

Dear PA,—I nose yew will he angxious to ear how I get on sins I left the

wing of the best of feathers. I am appy to say I am hear in a very

respeckble fammaly, ware they keeps too tawl footmen to my hand; one of

them is cawld John, and the other Pea-taw,—the latter is as vane as a P-

cock of his leggs, wich is really beutyful, and puffickly

streight—though the howskeaper ses he has bad angles; but some pipple

loox at things with only 1 i, and sea butt there defex. Mr. Wheazey is

the ass-matick butler and cotchman, who has lately lost his heir, and

can’t get no moar, wich is very diffycult after a serting age, even with

the help of Rowland’s Madagascar isle. Mrs. Tuffney, the howsekeaper, is

a prowd and oystere sort of person. I rather suspex that she’s jellows

of me and Pea-taw, who as bean throwink ship’s i’s at me. She thinks to

look down on me, but she can’t, for I hold myself up; and though we

brekfists and t’s at the same board, I treat with a deal of hot-tar, and

shoes her how much I dispeyses her supper-silly-ous conduck. Besides

these indyvidules, there’s another dome-stick, wich I wish to menshun

particlar—wich is the paige Theodore, that, as the poat says, as bean

“—contrived a double debt to pay,

A paige at night—a tigger all the day.”

In the mornink he’s a tigger, drest in a tite froc-cote, top-boots,

buxkin smawl-closes, and stuck up behind Master Ahghustusses cab. In the

heavening he gives up the tigger, and comes out as the paige, in a fansy

jackit, with too rose of guilt buttings, wich makes him the perfeck

immidge of Mr. Widdycomb, that ice sea in the serkul at Hashley’s

Amphitheatre. The paige’s bisiness is to weight on the ladies, wich is

naterally light work; and being such a small chap, you may suppose they

can never make enuff of him. These are all the upper servants, of

coarse, I shan’t lower myself by notusing the infearyour crechurs; such

as the owsmade, coke, edcett rar, but shall purceed drackly to the other

potion of the fammaly, beginning with the old guv’nor (as Pee-taw cawls

him), who as no idear of i life, and, like one of his own taller lites,

has only dipped into good sosiety. Next comes Missus:—in fact, I ot to

have put her fust, for the grey mayor is the best boss in our staybill,

(Exkews the wulgarisrm.) After Missus, I give persedince to Mr.

Ahghustuss, who, bean the only sun in the house, is natrally looked up

to by everybody in it. He as bean brot up a perfick genelman, at Oxfut,

and is consekently fond of spending his knights in le trou de charbon,

and afterwards of skewering the streets—twisting double knockers,

pulling singlebelles, and indulging in other fashonable divertions, to

wich the low-minded polease, and the settin madgistrets have strong

objexions. His Pa allows him only sicks hundred a-year, wich isn’t above

1/2 enuff to keep a cabb, a cupple of hosses, and other thinks, which

it’s not necessary to elude to here. Isn’t it ogious to curb so fine a

spirit? I wish you see him, Pa; such i’s, and such a pear of beutyful

black musquitoes on his lip—enuff to turn the hidds of all the wimming

he meats. The other membranes of this fammaly are the 3 dorters—Miss

Sofiar, Miss Selinar, and Miss Jorgina, wich are all young ladyes, full

groan, and goes in public characters to the Kaledonian bawls, and is

likewise angxious to get off hands as soon as a feverable opportunity

hoffers. It’s beleaved the old guv’nor can give them ten thowsand lbs.

a-peace, wich of coarse will have great weight with a husband. There’s

some Qrious stoaries going—Law! there’s Missuses bell. I must run up-

stairs, so must conclewd obroply, but hope to resoom my pen necks weak.

Believe me, my dear Pa, Your affeckshnt JULIA PUNCH.

CHARACTERISTIC CORRESPONDENCE. The following notes actually passed

between two (now) celebrated comedians:—

Dear J——, Send me a shilling.

Yours, B——,

P.S.—On second thoughts, make it two.

To which his friend replied—

Dear B——, I have but one shilling in the world.

Yours, J——,

P.S.—On second thoughts, I want that for dinner.

A young artist in Picayune takes such perfect likenesses, that a lady

married the portrait of her lover instead of the original.

[pg 18] PUNCH AND PEEL. Arcades ambo. READER.—God bless us, Mr. PUNCH!

who is that tall, fair-haired, somewhat parrot-faced gentleman, smiling

like a schoolboy over a mess of treacle, and now kissing the tips of his

five fingers as gingerly as if he were doomed to kiss a nettle?

PUNCH.—That, Mr. Reader, is the great cotton-plant, Sir Robert Peel; and

at this moment he has, in his own conceit, seized upon “the white

wonder” of Victoria’s hand, and is kissing it with Saint James’s

devotion.

READER.—What for, Mr. PUNCH?

PUNCH.—What for! At court, Mr. Reader, you always kiss when you obtain

an honour. ‘Tis a very old fashion, sir—old as the court of King David.

Well do I recollect what a smack Uriah gave to his majesty when he was

appointed to the post which made Bathsheba a widow. Poor Uriah! as we

say of the stag, that was when his horns were in the velvet.

READER.—You recollect it, Mr. PUNCH!—you at the court of King David!

PUNCH.—I, Mr. Reader, I!—and at every court, from the court of Cain in

Mesopotamia to the court of Victoria in this present, flinty-hearted

London; only the truth is, as I have travelled I have changed my name.

Bless you, half the Proverbs given to Solomon are mine. What I have lost

by keeping company with kings, not even Joseph Hume can calculate.

READER.—And are you really in court confidence at this moment?

PUNCH.—Am I? What! Hav’n’t you heard of the elections? Have you not

heard the shouts Io Punch? Doesn’t my nose glow like coral—ar’n’t my

chops radiant as a rainbow—hath not my hunch gone up at least two

inches—am I not, from crown to toe-nails, brightened, sublimated? Like

Alexander—he was a particular friend of mine, that same Alexander, and

therefore stole many of my best sayings—I only know that I am mortal by

two sensations—a yearning for loaves and fishes, and a love for Judy.

READER.—And you really take office under Peel?

PUNCH.—Ha! ha! ha! A good joke! Peel takes office under me. Ha! ha! I’m

only thinking what sport I shall have with the bedchamber women. But out

they must go. The constitution gives a minister the selection of his own

petticoats; and therefore there sha’n’t be a yard of Welsh flannel about

her Majesty that isn’t of my choice.

READER.—Do you really think that the royal bedchamber is in fact a third

house of Parliament—that the affairs of the state are always to be put

in the feminine gender?

PUNCH.—Most certainly: the ropes of the state rudder are nothing more

than cap-ribbons; if the minister hav’n’t hold of them, what can he do

with the ship? As for the debates in parliament, they have no more to do

with the real affairs of the country than the gossip of the apple-women

in Palace-yard. They’re made, like the maccaroni in Naples, for the poor

to swallow; and so that they gulp down length, they think, poor fellows,

they get strength. But for the real affairs of the country! Who shall

tell what correspondence can be conveyed in a warming-pan, what

intelligence—for

“There may be wisdom in a papillote”—

may be wrapt up in the curl-papers of the Crown? What subtle, sinister

advice may, by a crafty disposition of royal pins, be given on the royal

pincushion? What minister shall answer for the sound repose of Royalty,

if he be not permitted to make Royalty’s bed? How shall he answer for

the comely appearance of Royalty, if he do not, by his own delegated

hands, lace Royalty’s stays? I shudder to think of it; but, without the

key of the bedchamber, could my friend Peel be made responsible for the

health of the Princess? Instead of the very best and most scrupulously-

aired diaper, might not—by negligence or design, it matters not

which—the Princess Royal be rolled in an Act of Parliament, wet from

Hansard’s press?

READER.—Dreadful, soul perturbing suggestion! Go on, Mr. PUNCH.

PUNCH.—Not but what I think it—if their constitution will stand damp

paper—an admirable way of rearing young princesses. Queen Elizabeth—my

wife Judy was her wet nurse—was reared after that fashion.

READER.—David Hume says nothing of it.

PUNCH.—David Hume was one of the wonders of the earth—he was a lazy

Scotchman; but had he searched the State Paper Office, he would have

found the documents there—yes, the very Acts of Parliament—the very

printed rollers. To those rollers Queen Elizabeth owed her knowledge of

the English Constitution.

READER.—Explain—I can’t see how.

PUNCH.—Then you are very dull. Is not Parliament the assembled wisdom of

the country?

READER.—By a fiction, Mr. PUNCH.

PUNCH—Very well, Mr. Reader; what’s all the world but a fiction? I say,

the assembled wisdom; an Act of Parliament is the sifted wisdom of the

wise—the essence of an essence. Very well; know you not the mystic, the

medicinal effects of printer’s ink? The devil himself isn’t proof to a

blister of printer’s ink. Well, you take an Act of Parliament—and what

is it but the finest plaster of the finest brains—wet, reeking wet from

the press. Eschewing diaper, you roll the Act round the royal infant;

you roll it up and pin it in the conglomerated wisdom of the nation.

Now, consider the tenderness of a baby’s cuticle; the pores are open,

and a rapid and continual absorption takes place, so that long before

the Royal infant cuts its first tooth, it has taken up into its system

the whole body of the Statutes.

READER.—Might not some patriots object to the application of the wisdom

of the country to so domestic a purpose?

PUNCH.—Such patriots are more squeamish than wise. Sir, how many grown

up kings have we had, who have shown no more respect for the laws of the

country, than if they had been swaddled in ‘em?

READER.—Do you think your friend Sir Robert is for statute rollers?

PUNCH.—I can answer for Sir Robert on every point. His first attack

before he kisses hands—and he has, as you perceive, been practising this

half-hour—will be upon the women of the bedchamber. The war with

China—the price of sugar—the corn-laws—the fourteen new Bishops about to

be hatched—timber—cotton—a property tax, and the penny post—all these

matters and persons are of secondary importance to this greater

question—whether the female who hands the Queen her gown shall think

Lord Melbourne a “very pretty fellow in his day;” or whether she shall

believe my friend Sir Robert to be as great a conjuror as Roger Bacon or

the Wizard of the North—if the lady can look upon O’Connell and not call

for burnt feathers or scream for sal volatile; or if she really thinks

the Pope to be a woman with a naughty name, clothed in most

exceptionable scarlet. It is whether Lady Mary thinks black, or Lady

Clementina thinks white; whether her father who begot her voted with the

Marquis of Londonderry or Earl Grey—that is the grand question to be

solved, before my friend Sir Robert can condescend to be the saviour of

his country. To have the privilege of making a batch of peers, or a

handful of bishops is nothing, positively nothing—no, the crowning work

is to manufacture a lady’s maid. What’s a mitre to a mob-cap—what the

garters of a peer to the garters of the Lady Adeliza?

READER.—You are getting warm, Mr. PUNCH—very warm.

PUNCH.—I always do get warm when I talk of the delicious sex: for though

now and then I thrash my wife before company, who shall imagine how cosy

we are when we’re alone? Do you not remember that great axiom of Sir

Robert’s—an axiom that should make Machiavelli howl with envy—that “the

battle of the Constitution is to fought in the bedchamber.”

READER.—I remember it.

PUNCH.—That was a great sentence. Had Sir Robert known his true fame, he

would never after have opened his mouth.

READER.—Has the Queen sent for Sir Robert yet?

PUNCH.—No: though I know he has staid at home these ten days, and

answers every knock at the door himself, in expectation of a message.

READER.—They say the Queen doesn’t like Sir Robert.

PUNCH.—I’m also told that her Majesty has a great antipathy to

physic—yet when the Constitution requires medicine, why—

READER.—Sir Robert must be swallowed.

PUNCH.—Exactly so. We shall have warm work of it, no doubt—but I fear

nothing, when we have once got rid of the women. And then, we have a few

such nice wenches of our own to place about her Majesty; the Queen shall

take Conservatism as she might take measles—without knowing it.

READER.—And when, Mr. PUNCH—when you have got rid of the women, what do

you and Sir Robert purpose then?

PUNCH.—I beg your pardon: we shall meet again next week: it’s now two

o’clock. I have an appointment with half-a-dozen of my godsons; I have

promised them all places in the new government, and they’re come to take

their choice.

READER.—Do tell me this: Who has Peel selected for Commander of the

Forces?

PUNCH.—Who? Colonel Sibthorp.

READER.—And who for Chancellor of the Exchequer?

PUNCH.—Mr. Henry Moreton Dyer!

[pg 19] PUNCH’S PENCILLINGS.—No. II. A man in a lion's skin holding up

the upper half of a smaller man. The bottom half of the small man

remains on a bench marked TREASURY BENCH HERCULES TEARING THESEUS FROM

THE ROCK TO WHICH HE HAD GROWN.

(MODERNIZED.)

APOLLODORUS relates that THESEUS sat so long on a rock, that at length

he grew to it, so that when HERCULES tore him forcibly away, he left all

the nether part of the man behind him.

[pg 21] THE ELECTION OF BALLINAFAD. (FROM OUR SPECIAL CORRESPONDENT.) We

have been at considerable expense in procuring the subjoined account of

the election which has just terminated in the borough of Ballinafad, in

Ireland. Our readers may rest assured that our report is perfectly

exclusive, being taken, as the artists say, “on the spot,” by a special

bullet-proof reporter whom we engaged, at an enormous expense, for this

double hazardous service.

BALLINAFAD, 20th JULY.

Tuesday Morning, Eight o’clock.—The contest has begun! The struggle for

the independence of Ballinafad has commenced! Griggles, the opposition

candidate, is in the field, backed by a vile faction. The rank, wealth,

and independence of Ballinafad are all ranged under the banner of Figsby

and freedom. A party of Griggles’ voters have just marched into the

town, preceded by a piper and a blind fiddler, playing the most

obnoxious tunes. A barrel of beer has been broached at Griggles’

committee-rooms. We are all in a state of the greatest excitement.

Half-past Eight.—Mr. Figsby is this moment proceeding from his hotel to

the hustings, surrounded by his friends and a large body of the

independent teetotal electors. A wheelbarrow full of rotten eggs has

been sent up to the hustings, to be used, as occasion requires, by the

Figsby voters, who are bent upon

A fellow trying to pull a hog from a lake, but the rope broke “GOING THE

WHOLE HOG.”

A serious riot has occurred at the town pump, where two of the

independent teetotalers have been ducked by the opposite party. Stones

are beginning to fly in all directions. A general row is expected.

Nine o’clock.—Polling has commenced. Tom Daly, of Galway, the fighting

friend of Mr. Figsby, has just arrived, with three brace of duelling

pistols, and a carpet-bag full of powder and ball. This looks like

business. I have heard that six of Mr. Figsby’s voters have been locked

up in a barn by Griggles’ people. The poll is proceeding vigorously.

Ten o’clock.—State of the poll to this time:—

Figsby 19 Griggles 22 The most barefaced bribery is being employed by

Griggles. A lady, known to be in his interest, was seen buying half-a-

pound of tea, in the shop of Mr. Fad, the grocer, for which she paid

with a whole sovereign, and took no change. Two legs of mutton have also

been sent up to Griggles’ house, by Reilly, the butcher. Heaven knows

what will be the result. The voting is become serious—four men with

fractured skulls have, within these ten minutes, been carried into the

apothecary’s over the way. A couple of policemen have been thrown over

the bridge; but we are in too great a state of agitation to mind

trifles.

Half-past Twelve o’clock.—State of the poll to this time:—

Figsby 27 Griggles 36 You can have no idea of the frightful state of the

town. The faction are employing all sorts of bribery and intimidation.

The wife of a liberal greengrocer has just been seen with the Griggles

ribbons in her cap. Five pounds have been offered for a sucking-pig.

Figsby must come in, notwithstanding two cart-loads of the temperance

voters are now riding up to the poll, most of them being too drunk to

walk. Three duels have been this morning reported. Results not known.

The coroner has been holding inquests in the market-house all the

morning.

Three o’clock.—State of the poll to this time:—

Figsby 45 Griggles 39 The rascally corrupt assessor has decided that the

temperance electors who came up to vote for the Liberal candidate, being

too drunk to speak, were disentitled to vote. Some dead men had been

polled by Griggles.

The verdict of the coroner’s inquest on those who unfortunately lost

their lives this morning, has been, “Found dead.” Everybody admires the

sagacious conclusion at which the jury have arrived. It is reported that

Figsby has resigned! I am able to contradict the gross falsehood. Mr. F.

is now addressing the electors from his committee-room window, and has

this instant received a plumper—in the eye—in the shape of a rotten

potato. I have ascertained that the casualties amount to no more than

six men, two pigs, and two policemen, killed; thirteen men, women, and

children, wounded.

Four o’clock—State of the poll up to this time:—

Figsby 29 Griggles 41 The poll-clerks on both sides are drunk, the

assessor has closed the booths, and I am grieved to inform you that

Griggles has just been duly elected.

Half past Four o’clock.—Figsby has given Grigglcs the lie on the open

hustings. Will Griggles fight?

Five o’clock.—His wife insists he shall; so, of course, he must. I hear

that a message has just been delivered to Figsby. Tom Daly and his

carpet-bag passed under my window a few minutes ago.

Half-past Five o’clock.—Two post-chaises have just dashed by at full

speed—I got a glimpse of Tom Daly smoking a cigar in one of them.

Six o’clock.—I open my letter to tell you that Figsby is the favourite;

3 to 1 has been offered at the club, that he wings his man; and 3 to 2

that he drills him. The public anxiety is intense.

Half-past Six.—I again open my letter to say, that I have nothing

further to add, except that the betting continues in favour of the

popular candidate.

Seven o’clock.—Huzza!—Griggles is shot! The glorious principles of

constitutional freedom have been triumphant! The town is in an uproar of

delight! We are making preparations to illuminate. BALLINAFAD IS SAVED!

FIGSBY FOR EVER!

EPIGRAM. Lord Johnny from Stroud thought it best to retreat.

Being certain of getting the sack,

So he ran to the City, and begged for a seat,

Crying, “Please to re-member Poor Jack!”

CONUNDRUMS BY COL. SIBTHORP. Why is a tall nobleman like a

poker?—Because he’s a high’un belonging to the great.

Why is a defunct mother like a dog?—Because she’s a ma-stiff.

When is a horse like a herring?—When he’s hard rode.

EPIGRAM ON SEEING AN EXECUTION. One morn, two friends before the Newgate

drop,

To see a culprit throttled, chanced to stop:

“Alas!” cried one as round in air he spun,

“That miserable wretch’s race is run.”

“True,” said the other drily, “to his cost,

The race is run—but, by a neck ‘tis lost.”

FASHIONABLE ARRIVALS. Lord John Russell has arrived at a conviction—that

the Whigs are not so popular as they were.

Sir Peter Laurie has arrived at the conclusion—that Solon was a greater

man than himself.

THE POET FOILED. To win the maid the poet tries,

And sonnets writes to Julia’s eyes;—

She likes a verse—but cruel whim,

She still appears a-verse to him.

A most cruel hoax has recently been played off upon that deserving class

the housemaids of London, by the insertion of an advertisement in the

morning papers, announcing that a servant in the above capacity was

wanted by Lord Melbourne. Had it been for a cook, the absurdity would

have been too palpable, as Melbourne has frequently expressed his

opposition to sinecures.

ECCLESIASTICAL TRANSPORTATION. Now B—y P—l has beat the Whigs,

The Church can’t understand

Why Bot’ny Bay should be all sea,

And have no see on land.

For such a lamentable want

Our good Archbishop grieves;

’Tis very strange the Tories should Remind him of the thieves!

EPIGRAM. An American paper tells us of a woman named Dobbs, who was

killed in a preaching-house at Nashville, by the fall of a chandelier on

her head. Brett’s Patent Brandy poet, who would as soon make a witticism

on a cracked crown as a cracked bottle, has sent us the following:—

“The light of life comes from above,”

Old Dingdrum snuffling said;

“The light came down on Peggy Dobbs,

And Peggy Dobbs was dead.”

A man in Kentucky was so absent, that he put himself on the toasting-

fork, and did not discover his mistake until he was done brown.

CONSISTENCY. No wonder Tory landlords flout

“Fix’d Duty,” for ’tis plain,

With them the Anti-Corn-Law Bill

Must go against the grain.

The anticipated eruption of Mount Vesuvius is said to have been

prevented by throwing a box of Holloway’s Ointment into the crater.

[pg 22] THE SAILOR’S SECRET. In the year—let me see—but no matter about

the date—my father and mother died of a typhus fever, leaving me to the

care of an only relative, and uncle, by my father’s side. His name was

Box, as my name is Box. I was a babby in long clothes at that time, not

even so much as christened; so uncle, taking the hint, I suppose, from

the lid of his sea-chest, had me called Bellophron Box. Bellophron being

the name of the ship of which he was sailing-master.

I sha’n’t say anything about my education; though I was brought up in

A Pirate Boarding Battle A FIRST RATE BOARDING-SCHOOL.

It’s not much to boast of; but as soon as I could bear the weight of a

cockade and a dirk, uncle got me a berth as midshipman on board his own

ship. So there I was, Mr. Bellophron Box. I didn’t like the sea or the

service, being continually disgusted at the partiality shown towards me,

for in less than a month I was put over the heads of all my superior

officers. You may stare—but it’s true; for I was mast-headed for a week

at a stretch. When we put into port, Captain —— called me into his

cabin, and politely informed me that if I chose to go on shore, and

should find it inconvenient to return, no impertinent inquiries should

be made after me. I availed myself of the hint, and exactly one year and

two months after setting foot on board the Bellophron, I was Master

Bellophron Box again.

Well, now for my story. There was one Tom Johnson on board, a fok’sell

man, as they called him, who was very kind to me; he tried to teach me

to turn a quid, and generously helped me to drink my grog. As I was

unmercifully quizzed in the cockpit, I grew more partial to the society

of Tom than to that of my brother middies. Tom always addressed

me,’Sir,’ and they named me Puddinghead; till at last we might be called

friends. During many a night-watch, when I have sneaked away for a

snooze among the hen-coops, has Tom saved me from detection, and the

consequent pleasant occupation of carrying about a bucket of water on

the end of a capstan bar.

I had been on board about a month—perhaps two—when the order came down

from the Admiralty, for the men to cut off their tails. Lord, what a

scene was there! I wonder it didn’t cause a mutiny! I think it would

have done so, but half the crew were laid up with colds in their heads,

from the suddenness of the change, though an extra allowance of rum was

served out to rub them with to prevent such consequences; but the purser

not giving any definite directions, whether the application was to be

external or internal, the liquor, I regret to say, for the honour of the

British navy, was applied much lower down. For some weeks the men seemed

half-crazed, and were almost as unmanageable as ships that had lost

their rudders. Well, so they had! It was a melancholy sight to see piles

of beautiful tails with little labels tied to them, like the

instructions on a physic-bottle; each directed to some favoured relative

or sweetheart of the curtailed seamen. What a strange appearance must

Portsmouth, and Falmouth, and Plymouth, and all the other mouths that

are filled with sea-stores, have presented, when the precious

remembrances were distributed! I wish some artist would consider it; for

I think it’s a shame that there should be no record of such an

interesting circumstance.

One night, shortly after this visitation, it blew great guns. Large

black clouds, like chimney-sweepers’ feather-beds, scudded over our

heads, and the rain came pouring down like—like winking. Tom had been

promoted, and was sent up aloft to reef a sail, when one of the horses

giving way, down came Tom Johnson, and snap went a leg and an arm. I was

ordered to see him carried below, an office which I readily performed,

for I liked the man—and they don’t allow umbrellas in the navy.

“What’s the matter?” said the surgeon.

“Nothing particular, sir; on’y Tom’s broke his legs and his arms by a

fall from the yard,” replied a seaman.

Tom groaned, as though he did consider it something very particular.

He was soon stripped and the shattered bones set, which was no easy

matter, the ship pitching and tossing about as she did. I sat down

beside his berth, holding on as well as I could. The wind howled through

the rigging, making the vessel seem like an infernal Eolian harp; the

thunder rumbled like an indisposed giant, and to make things more

agreeable, a gun broke from its lashings, and had it all its own way for

about a quarter of an hour. Tom groaned most pitiably. I looked at him,

and if I were to live for a thousand years, I shall never forget the

expression of his face. His lips were blue, and—no matter, I’m not

clever at portrait painting: but imagine an old-fashioned Saracen’s

Head—not the fine handsome fellow they have stuck on Snow Hill, but one

of the griffins of 1809—and you have Tom’s phiz, only it wants touching

with all the colours of a painter’s palette. I was quite frightened, and

could only stammer out, “Why T-o-o-m!”

“It’s all up, sir,” says he; “I must go; I feel it.”

“Don’t be foolish,” I replied; “Don’t die till I call the surgeon.” It

was a stupid speech, I acknowledge, but I could not help it at the time.

“No, no; don’t call the surgeon, Mr. Box; he’s done all he can, sir. But

it’s here—it’s here!” and then he made an effort to thump his heart, or

the back of his head, I couldn’t make out which.

I trembled like a jelly. I had once seen a melodrama, and I recollected

that the villain of the piece had used the same action, the same words.

“Mr. Box,” groaned Tom, “I’ve a-a-secret as makes me very uneasy, sir,”

“Indeed, Tom,” I replied; “hadn’t you better confess the mur—” murder, I

was a going to say, but I thought it might not be polite, considering

Tom’s situation.

The ruffian, for such he looked then, tried to raise himself, but

another lurch of the Bellophron sent him on his back, and myself on my

beam-ends. As soon as I recovered my former position, Tom continued—

“Mr. Box, dare I trust you, sir? if I could do so, I’m sartin as how I

should soon be easier.”

“Of course,” said I, “of course; out with it, and I promise never to

betray your confidence.”

“Then come, come here,” gasped the suffering wretch; “give us your hand,

sir.”

I instinctively shrunk back with horror!

“Don’t be long, Mr. Box, for every minute makes it worse,” and then his

Saracen’s Head changed to a feminine expression, and resembled the Belle

Sauvage.

I couldn’t resist the appeal; so placing my hand in his, Tom put it over

his shoulder, and, with a ghastly smile, said, “Pull it out, sir!”

“Pull what out?”

“My secret, Mr. Box; it’s hurting on me!”

I thought that he had grown delirious; so, in order to soothe him as

much as possible, I forced my hand under his shirt-collar, and what do

you think I found? Why, a PIGTAIL—his pigtail, which he had contrived to

conceal between his shirt and his skin, when the barbarous order of the

Admiralty had been put into execution.

A silhouette of a bulldog pulling a sailor's pigtail A NAUTICAL TALE.

SONGS FOR THE SENTIMENTAL. No. II. You say you would find

But one, and one only,

Who’d feel without you

That the revel was lonely:

That when you were near,

Time ever was fleetest,

And deem your loved voice

Of all music the sweetest.

Who would own her heart thine,

Though a monarch beset it,

And love on unchanged—

Don’t you wish you may get it?

You say you would rove

Where the bud cannot wither;

Where Araby’s perfumes

Each breeze wafteth thither.

Where the lute hath no string

That can waken a sorrow;

Where the soft twilight blends

With the dawn of the morrow;

Where joy kindles joy,

Ere you learn to forget it,

And care never comes—

Don’t you wish you may get it?

“SYLLABLES WHICH BREATHE OF THE SWEET SOUTH.” JOEY HUME is about to

depart for Switzerland: for, finding his flummery of no avail at Leeds,

we presume he intends to go to Schaff-hausen, to try the Cant-on.

MARRIAGE AND CHRISTENING EXTRAORDINARY. We beg to congratulate Lord John

Russell on his approaching union with Lady Fanny Elliot. His lordship is

such a persevering votary of Hymen, that we think he should be named

“Union-Jack.”

OMINOUS. LORD PALMERSTON, on his road to Windsor, narrowly escaped being

upset by a gentleman in a gig. We have been privately informed that the

party with whom he came in collision was—Sir Robert Peel.

[pg 23] CROSS READINGS. (REC.)

If you ever should be

In a state of ennui,

Just listen to me,

And without any fee

I’ll give you a hint how to set yourself free.

Though dearth of intelligence weaken the news,

And you feel an incipient attack of the blues,

For amusement you never need be at a loss,

If you take up the paper and read it across.

(INTER ARIA DEMI LOQUI.)

Here’s the Times, apropos,

And so,

With your patience, I’ll show

What I mean, by perusing a passage or two.

(ARIA.)

“Hem! Mr. George Robins is anxious to tell,

In very plain prose, he’s instructed to sell”—

“A vote for the county”—“packed neatly in straw”—

“Set by Holloway’s Ointment”—“a limb of the law.”

“The army has had secret orders to seize”—

“As soon as they can”—“the industrious fleas.”

For amusement you never need be at a loss,

If you take a newspaper and read it across.

“The opera opens with”—“elegant coats”—

“For silver and gold we exchange foreign notes”—

“Specific to soften mortality’s ills”—

“And cure Yorkshire bacon”—“take Morison’s pills.”

“Curious coincidence”—“steam to Gravesend.”

“Tale of deep interest”—“money to lend”—

“Louisa is waiting for William to send.”

For amusement you never need be at a loss,

If you take a newspaper and read it across.

“For relief of the Poles”—“an astounding feat!”—

“A respectable man”—“for a water will eat”—

“The Macadamised portion of Parliament-street.”

“Mysterious occurrence!”—“expected incog.”

“To be viewed by cards only”—“a terrible fog.”

“At eight in the morning the steam carriage starts”—

“Takes passengers now”—“to be finished in parts.”

For amusement you never need be at a loss,

If you take a newspaper and read it across.

“Left in a cab, and”—“the number not known”

“A famous prize ox, weighing 200 stone”—

“He speaks with a lisp”—“has a delicate shape”—

“And had on, when he quitted, a Macintosh cape.”

“For China direct, a fine”—“dealer in slops.”

“To the curious in shaving”—“new way to dress chops.”

“Repeal of the corn”—“was roasted for lunch”—

“Teetotal beverage “—“Triumph of PUNCH!”

For amusement you never need be at a loss,

If you take a newspaper and read it across.

A CON. BY DUNCOMBE. “Why are four thousand eight hundred and forty yards

of land obtained on credit like a drinking song?”—“Because it’s an-acre-

on-tic.”—“I think I had you there!”

A WOOD CUT. A correspondent of one of the morning papers exultingly

observes, that the wood-blocks which are about being removed from

Whitehall are in excellent condition. If this is an allusion to the

present ministry, we should say, emphatically, NOT.

REVENGE IS SWEET. The Tories in Beverley have been wreaking their

vengeance on their opponents at the late election, by ordering their

tradesmen who voted against the Conservative candidate to send in their

bills. Mr. Duncombe declares that this is a mode of revenge he never

would condescend to adopt.

If Farren, cleverest of men,

Should go to the right about,

What part of town will he be then?—

Why, Farren-done-without!

“WHAT HO! APOTHECARY.” Cox, a pill-doctor at Leeds, it is reported,

modestly requested a check for £10, for the honour of his vote. Had his

demand been complied with, we presume the bribe would have been

endorsed, “This draught to be taken at poll time.”

QUESTION BY THE DISOWNED OF NOTTINGHAM. Why do men who are about to

fight a duel generally choose a field for the place of action?

ANSWER BY COLONEL SIBTHORP. I really cannot tell; unless it be for the

purpose of allowing the balls to graze.

REVIEW. Two Prize Essays. By LORD MELBOURNE and SIR ROBERT PEEL. 8 vols.

folio. London: Messrs. SOFTSKIN and TINGLE, Downing-street.

We congratulate the refined and sensitive publishers on the production

of these elaborately-written gilt-edged folios, and trust that no

remarks will issue from the press calculated to affect the digestion of

any of the parties concerned. The sale of the volumes will, no doubt, be

commensurate with the public spirit, the wisdom, and the benevolence

which has uniformly characterised the career of their illustrated

authors. Two more statesmanlike volumes never issued from the press; in

fact, the books may be regarded as typical of all statesmen. The

subject, or rather the line of argument, is thus designated by the

respective writers:—

ESSAY I.—“On the Fine Art of Government, or how to do the least possible

good to the country in the longest possible time, and enjoy, meanwhile,

the most ease and luxury.” By LORD MELBOURNE.

ESSAY II.—“On the Science of Governing, or how to do the utmost possible

good for ourselves in the shortest possible time, under the name of our

altars, and our throne, and everybody that is good and wise.” By SIR

ROBERT PEEL.

We are quite unable to enter into a review of these very costly

productions, an estimate of the value of which the public will be sure

to receive from “authority,” and be required to meet the amount, not

only with cheerful loyalty, but a more weighty and less noisy

acknowledgment.

As to the Prize, it has been adjudged by PUNCH to be divided equally

between the two illustrious essayists; to the one, in virtue of his

incorrigible laziness, and to the other, in honour of his audacious

rapacity.

TO THE LAUGHTER-LOVING PUBLIC. PUNCH begs to inform the inhabitants of

Great Britain, Ireland, and the Isle of Dogs, that he has just opened on

an entirely new line, an Universal Comic Railroad, and Cosmopolitan

Pleasure Van for the transmission of bon mots, puns, witticisms,

humorous passengers, and queer figures, to every part of the world. The

engines have been constructed on the most laughable principles, and

being on the high-pressure principle, the manager has provided a vast

number of patent anti-explosive fun-belts, to secure his passengers

against the danger of suddenly bursting.

The train starts every Saturday morning, under the guidance of an

experienced punster. The departure of the train is always attended with

immense laughter, and a tremendous rush to the booking-office. PUNCH,

therefore, requests those who purpose taking places to apply early, as

there will be no

A group of shadows leaping off of a bench RESERVED SEATS!

N.B.—Light jokes booked, and forwarded free of expense. Heavy articles

not admitted at any price.

? Wanted an epigrammatic porter, who can carry on a smart dialogue, and

occasionally deliver light jokes.

CHANT. TO OLD FATHER TIME. Time—old Time—whither away?

Linger a moment with us, I pray;

Too soon thou spreadest thy wings for flight;

Dip, boy, dip

In the bowl thy lip,

And be jolly, old Time, with us to-night.

Dip, dip, &c.

Time—old Time—thy scythe fling down;

Garland thy pate with a myrtle crown,

And fill thy goblet with rosy wine;—

Fill, fill up,

The joy-giving cup,

Till it foams and flows o’er the brim like mine. Fill, fill, &c.

Time—old Time—sighing is vain,

Pleasure from thee not a moment can gain;

Fly, old greybeard, but leave us your glass

To fill as we please,

And drink at our ease,

And count by our brimmers the hours as they pass.

[pg 24] THE DRAMA ROMEO AND JULIET. Italy! land of love and maccaroni,

of pathos and puppets—tomb of Romeo and Juliet—birth-place of Punch and

Judy—region of romance—country of the concentrated essences of all

these;—carnivals—I, PUNCH, the first and last, the alpha and omega of

fun, adore thee! From the moment when I was cast upon thy shores, like

Venus, out of the sea, to this sad day, when I am forced to descend from

my own stage to mere criticism; have I preserved every token that would

endear my memory to thee! My nose is still Roman, my mouth-organ plays

the “genteelest of” Italian “tunes”—my scenes represent the choicest of

Italian villas—in “choice Italian” doth my devil swear—to wit, “shal-la-

bella!”

Longing to be still more reminded of thee, dear Italy, I threw a large

cloak over my hunch, and a huge pair of spectacles over my nose, and

ensconced myself in a box at the Haymarket Theatre, to witness the

fourth appearance of my rival puppet, Charles Kean, in Romeo. He is an

actor! What a deep voice—what an interesting lisp—what a charming

whine—what a vigorous stamp, he hath! How hard he strikes his forehead

when he is going into a rage—how flat he falls upon the ground when he

is going to die! And then, when he has killed Tybalt, what an attitude

he strikes, what an appalling grin he indulges his gaping admirers

withal!

This is real acting that one pays one’s money to see, and not such an

unblushing imposition as Miss Tree practises upon us. Do we go to the

play to see nature? of course not: we only desire to see the actors

playing at being natural, like Mr. Gallot, Mr. Howe, Mr. Worral, or Mr.

Kean, and other actors. This system of being too natural will, in the

end, be the ruin of the drama. It has already driven me from the Stage,

and will, I fear, serve the great performers I nave named above in the

same manner. But the Haymarket Juliet overdoes it; she is more natural

than nature, for she makes one or two improbabilities in the plot of the

play seem like every-day matters of fact. Whether she falls madly in

love at the first glance, agrees to be married the next afternoon, takes

a sleeping draught, throws herself lifeless upon the bed, or wakes in

the tomb to behold her poisoned lover, still in all these situations she

behaves like a sensible, high-minded girl, that takes such

circumstances, and makes them appear to the audience—quite as a matter

of course! What let me ask, was the use of the author—whose name, I

believe, was Shakspere—purposely contriving these improbabilities, if

the actors do not make the most of them? I do hope Miss Tree will no

longer impose upon the public by pretending to act Juliet. Let her try

some of the characters in Bulwer’s plays, which want all her help to

make them resemble women of any nation, kindred, or country.

Much as I admire Kean, I always prefer the acting of Wallack; there is

more variety in the tones of his voice, for Kean tunes his pipes exactly

as my long-drummer sets his drum;—to one pitch: but as to action,

Wallack—more like my drummer—beats him hollow; he points his toes,

stands a-kimbo, takes off his hat, and puts it on again, quite as

naturally as if he belonged to the really legitimate drama, and was

worked by strings cleverly pulled to suit the action to every word.

Wallack is an honest performer; he don’t impose upon you, like Webster,

for instance, who as the Apothecary, speaks with a hungry voice, walks

with a tottering step, moves with a helpless gait, which plainly shows

that he never studied the part—he must have starved for it. Where will

this confounded naturalness end?

The play is “got up,” as we managers call it, capitally. The dresses are

superb, and so are the properties. The scenery exhibited views of

different parts of the city, and was, so far as I am a judge, well

painted. I have only one objection to the balcony scene. Plagiarism is

mean and contemptible—I despise it. I will not apply to the Vice-

Chancellor for an injunction, because the imitation is so vilely

caricatured; but the balcony itself is the very counterpart of PUNCH’S

theatre!—PUNCH.

MY FRIEND THE CAPTAIN. When a new farce begins with duck and green peas,

it promises well; the sympathies of the audience are secured, especially

as the curtain rises but a short time before every sober play-goer is

ready for his supper. Mr. Gabriel Snoxall is seated before the

comsstibles above mentioned—he is just established in a new lodging. It

is snug—the furniture is neat—being his own property, for he is an

unfurnished lodger. A bachelor so situated must be a happy fellow. Mr.

Snoxall is happy—a smile radiates his face—he takes wine with himself;

but has scarcely tapped the decanter for his first glass, before he

hears a tap at his door. The hospitable “Come in!” is answered by the

appearance of Mr. Dunne Brown, a captain by courtesy, and Snoxall’s

neighbour by misfortune. Here business begins.

The ancient natural historian has divided the genus homo into the two

grand divisions of victimiser and victim. Behold one of each class

before you—the yeast and sweat-wort, as it were, which brew the plot!

Brown invites himself to dinner, and does the invitation ample justice;

for he finds the peas as green as the host; who he determines shall be

done no less brown than the duck. He possesses two valuable

qualifications in a diner-out—an excellent appetite, and a habit of

eating fast, consequently the meal is soon over. Mr. Brown’s own tiger

clears away, by the ingenious method of eating up what is left. Mr.

Snoxall is angry, for he is hungry; but, good easy man, allows himself

to be mollified to a degree of softness that allows Mr. Brown to borrow,

not only his tables and chairs, but his coat, hat, and watch; just, too,

in the very nick of time, for the bailiffs are announced. What is the

hunted creditor to do? Exit by the window to be sure.

A character invented by farce-writers, and retained exclusively for

their use—for such folks are seldom met with out of a farce—lives in the

next street. He has a lovely daughter, and a nephew momentarily expected

from India, and with those persons he has, of course, not the slighest

acquaintance; and a niece, by marriage, of whose relationship he is also

entirely unconscious. His parlours are made with French windows; they

are open, and invite the bailiff-hunted Brown into the house. What so

natural as that he should find out the state of family affairs from a

loquacious Abigail, and should personate the expected nephew? Mr.

Tidmarsh (the property old gentleman of the farce-writers) is in

ecstacics. Mrs. T. sees in the supposed Selbourne a son-in-law for her

daughter, whose vision is directed to the same prospects. Happy,

domestic circle! unequalled family felicity! too soon, alas! to be

disturbed by a singular coincidence. Mr. Snoxall, the victim, is in love

with Miss Sophia, the daughter. Ruin impends over Brown; but he is

master of his art: he persuades Snoxall not to undeceive the family of

Tidmarsh, and kindly undertakes to pop the question to Sophia on behalf

of his friend, whose sheepishness quite equals his softness. Thus

emboldened, Brown inquires after a “few loose sovereigns,” and Snoxall,

having been already done out of his chairs, clothes, and watch, of

course lends the victimiser his purse, which contains twenty.

Mr. Brown’s career advances prosperously; he makes love in the dark to

his supposed cousin pro Snoxall, in the hearing of the supposed wife

(for the real Selbourne has been married privately) and his supposed

friend, both supposing him false, mightily abuse him, all being still in

the dark. At length the real Selbourne enters, and all supposition ends,

as does the farce, poetical justice being administered upon the captain

by courtesy, by the bailiffs who arrest him. Thus he, at last, becomes

really Mr. Dunne Brown.

The farce was successful, for the actors were perfect, and the audience

good-humoured. We need hardly say who played the hero; and having named

Wrench, as the nephew, who was much as usual, everybody will know how.

Mr. David Rees is well adapted for Snoxall, being a good figure for the

part, especially in the duck-and-green-peas season. The ladies, of whom

there were four, performed as ladies generally do in farces on a first

night.

We recommend the readers of PUNCH to cultivate the acquaintance of “My

Friend the Captain.” They will find him at home every evening at the

Haymarket. We suspect his paternity may be traced to a certain corner,

from whose merit several equally successful broad-pieces have been

issued.

LITERARY QUERIES AND REPLIES BY DISTINGUISHED PERSONAGES. QUESTION BY

SIR EDWARD LYTTON BULWER, BART, “What romance is that which outght to be

most admired in the kitchen?”

ANSWER BY THEODORE HOOK. “Don Quixote; because it was written by

Cervantes—(servantes).—Rather low, Sir Ned.”

QUESTION BY LADY BLESSINGTON, “When is a lady’s neck not a neck?”

ANSWER BY LADY MORGAN. “For shame now!—When it is a little bare (bear),

I suppose.”

A SPEECH FROM THE HUSTINGS. The following is a correct report of a

speech made by one of the candidates at a recent election in the north

of England.

THOMAS SMITH, Esq., then presented himself, and said—“ * * * *

* * * * crisis * * * * * *

* * * * * * * important dreadful * *

* * * industry * * * * * * enemies

* * slaves * * independence * * *

* * * freedom * * * * * firmly

* * * * gloriously * * * * contested

* * * * * * support * * * *

victory, Hurrah!——”

Mr. Smith then sat down; but we regret that the uproar which prevailed,

prevents us giving a fuller report of his very eloquent and impressive

speech.

FASHIONABLE MOVEMENTS. COUNT D’ORSAY declares that no gentleman having

the slightest pretensions to fashionable consideration can be seen out

of doors except on a Sunday, as on that day bailiffs and other low

people keep at home.

EPIGRAM ON A VERY LARGE WOMAN. “All flesh is grass,” so do the

Scriptures say;

But grass, when cut and dried, is turned to hay;

Then, lo; if Death to thee his scythe should take,

God bless us! what a haycock thou wouldst make.

An author that lived somewhere has such a brilliant wit, that he

contracted to light the parish with it, and did it.

“Our church clock,” say the editors of a down-cast paper, “keeps time so

well that we get a day out of every week by it.”

A man in Kentucky has a horse which is so slow, that his hind legs

always get first to his journey’s end.

PUNCH, OR THE LONDON CHARIVARI. VOL. 1. [pg 25] JULY 31, 1841. POETRY ON

AN IMPROVED PRINCIPLE. Let me earnestly implore you, good Mr. PUNCH, to

give publicity to a new invention in the art of poetry, which I desire

only to claim the merit of having discovered. I am perfectly willing to

permit others to improve upon it, and to bring it to that perfection of

which I am delightedly aware, it is susceptible.

It is sometimes lamented that the taste for poetry is on the

decline—that it is no longer relished—that the public will never again

purchase it as a luxury. But it must be some consolation to our modern

poets to know (as no doubt they do, for it is by this time notorious)

that their productions really do a vast deal of service—that they are of

a value for which they were never designed. They—I mean many of

them—have found their way into the pharmacopoeia, and are constantly

prescribed by physicians as soporifics of rare potency. For instance—

“—— not poppy, nor mandragora,

Nor all the drowsy syrups of the world.

Shall ever usher thee to that sweet sleep”

to which a man shall be conducted by a few doses of Robert Montgomery’s

Devil’s Elixir, called “Satan,” or by a portion, or rather a potion, of

“Oxford.” Apollo, we know, was the god of medicine as well as of poetry.

Behold, in this our bard, his two divine functions equally mingled!

But waiving this, of which it was not my intention to speak, let me

remark, that the reason why poetry will no longer go down with the

public, as poetry, is, that the whole frame-work is worn out. No new

rhymes can be got at. When we come to a “mountain,” we are tolerably

sure that a “fountain” is not very far off; when we see “sadness,” it

leads at once to “madness”—to “borrow” is sure to be followed by

“sorrow;” and although it is said, “when poverty comes in at the door,

love flies out of the window,”—a saying which seems to imply that

poverty may sometimes enter at the chimney or elsewhere—yet I assure

you, in poetry, “the poor” always come in, and always go out at “the

door.”

My new invention has closed the “door,” for the future, against the

vulgar crew of versifiers. A man must be original. He must write common-

sense too—hard exactions I know, but it cannot be helped.

I transmit you a specimen. Like all great discoveries, the chief merit

of my invention is its simplicity. Lest, however, “the meanest capacity”

(which cannot, by the way, be supposed to be addicted to PUNCH) should

boggle at it, it may be as well to explain that every letter of the

final word of each alternate line must be pronounced as though Dilworth

himself presided at the perusal; and that the last letter (or letters)

placed in italics will be found to constitute the rhyme. Here, then, we

have

A RENCONTRE WITH A TEA-TOTALLER. On going forth last night, a friend to

see,

I met a man by trade a s-n-o-b;

Reeling along the path he held his way.

“Ho! ho!” quoth I, “he’s d-r-u-n-k.”

Then thus to him—“Were it not better, far,

You were a little s-o-b-e-r?

’Twere happier for your family, I guess,

Than playing off such rum r-i-g-s.

Besides, all drunkards, when policemen see ’em,

Are taken up at once by t-h-e-m.”

“Me drunk!” the cobbler cried, “the devil trouble you!

You want to kick up a blest r-o-w.

Now, may I never wish to work for Hoby,

If drain I’ve had!” (the lying s-n-o-b!)

I’ve just return’d from a tee-total party,

Twelve on us jamm’d in a spring c-a-r-t.

The man as lectured, now, was drunk; why, bless ye,

He’s sent home in a c-h-a-i-s-e.

He’d taken so much lush into his belly,

I’m blest if he could t-o-dd-l-e.

A pair on ’em—hisself and his good lady;—

The gin had got into her h-e-a-d.

(My eye and Betty! what weak mortals we are;

They said they took but ginger b-e-e-r!)

But as for me, I’ve stuck (’twas rather ropy)

All day to weak imperial p-o-p.

And now we’ve had this little bit o’sparrin’,

Just stand a q-u-a-r-t-e-r-n!”

A man in New-York enjoys such very excellent spirits that he has only to

drink water to intoxicate himself.

TO JOBBING PATRIOTS. MR. GEORGE ROBINS. with unparalleled gratification,

begs to state that he has it in

Command to announce, that in consequence of

LORD JOHN RUSSELL’S LETTER to the citizens of London having

satisfactorily convinced her

MOST GRACIOUS MAJESTY that a change of ministry

CANNOT be productive of a corresponding transformation of measures, and

that the late

POLITICO-GLADIATORIAL STRUGGLE for the guerdon of office could only have

emanated from a highly commendatory desire on the part of the

disinterested and patriotic belligerents

TO SERVE THEMSELVES or their country,

HIS ROYAL MISTRESS, ever solicitous to enchain the hearts of her devoted

subjects, by an impartial exercise of her prerogative, has determined to

submit to the

ARBITRATION OF HIS HUMBLE HAMMER, some of those desirable places, so

long known as the stimuli to the

LACTANT LYCURGI of the nineteenth century.

LOT 1. FIRST LORD OF THE TREASURY, at present in possession of Lord

Melbourne. This will be found a most eligible investment, as it embraces

a considerable extent of female patronage, comprising the appointments

of those valuable legislative adjuncts,

THE LADIES OF THE BEDCHAMBER, AND THE ROYAL NURSES, WET AND DRY;

together with those household desiderata,

COALS AND CANDLES, and an unlimited

RUN OF THE ROYAL KITCHEN. LOT 2. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE COLONIAL

DEPARTMENT, at present occupied by Lord John Russell. This lot must

possess considerable attraction for a gastronomical experimentalist, as

its present proprietor has for a long time been engaged in the discovery

of how few pinches of oatmeal and spoonsful of gruel are sufficient for

a human pauper, and will be happy to transfer his data to the next

fortunate proprietor. Any gentleman desirous of embarking in the

manufacture of

SUGAR CANDY, MATCHES, OR CHEAP BREAD, would find this a desirable

investment, more particularly should he wish to form either

A PAROCHIAL OR MATRIMONIAL UNION, as there are plans for the one, and

hints for the other, which will be thrown into the bargain, being of no

further use to the present noble incumbent.

LOT 3. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT, at present the

property of Lord Normanby. Is admirably calculated for any one of a

literary turn of mind, offering resources peculiarly adapted for a

proper cultivation of the Jack Sheppard and James Hatfield “men-of-

elegant-crimes” school of novel-writing—the archives of Newgate and

Horsemonger-lane being open at all times to the inspection of the

favoured purchaser.

“YES” OR “NO” will determine the sale of this desirable lot in a few

days.

LOT 4. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS, now in the occupancy of

Lord Palmerston. Possesses advantages rarely to be met with. From its

connexion with the continental powers, Eau de Cologne, bear’s grease,

and cosmetics of unrivalled excellence, can be procured at all times,

thus insuring the favour of the divine sex,

“From the rich peasant-cheek of bronze,

And large black eyes that flash on you a volley

Of rays, that say a thousand things at once,

To the high dama’s brow more melancholy.”

The only requisite (besides money) for this desirable lot is, that the

purchaser must write a bold round hand for

PROTOCOLS, understand French and Chinese, and be an

EXPERT TURNER. LOT 5. SEVERAL UNDER SECRETARYSHIPS, admirably adapted

for younger sons and poor relatives.

The whole of the proceeds (by the advice of her Majesty’s Cabinet

Council) will be devoted to the erection of a

UNION FOR DECAYED MINISTERS. Cards to view may be had at the Treasury

any day after the meeting of Parliament.

“Very like a whale!” as the schoolmaster said when he examined the boy’s

back after severely flogging him.

[pg 26] THE DIARY OF A LORD MAYOR. All the world is familiar with the

“Diary of a Physician,” the “Diary of an Ennuyée,” the “Diary of a Lady

of Rank,” and Heaven knows how many other diaries besides! but who has

ever heard of, or saw, the “Diary of a Lord Mayor,—that day-book, or

blotter, as it may be commercially termed, of a gigantic mind? Who has

ever perused the autobiography of the Lama of Guildhall, Cham of

Cripplegate, Admiral of Fleet Ditch, Great Turtle-hunter and Herod of

Michaelmas geese? We will take upon ourselves to answer—not one! It was

reserved for PUNCH to give to his dear friends, the public, the first

and only extract which has ever been made from the genuine diary of a

late Lord Mayor of London, or, as that august individual was wont, when

in Paris, to designate himself on his visiting tickets—

“Mr. ——

“FEU LORD MAYOR DE LONDRES.”

How the precious MS. came into our possession matters little to the

reader; suffice it to say, it is a secret which must ever remain

confined to the bosoms of PUNCH and his cheesemonger.

DIARY. Nov. 10, eight o’clock.—Dreamed a horrid dream—thought that I was

stretched in Guildhall with the two giants sitting on my chest, and

drinking rum toddy out of firemen’s buckets—fancied the Board of

Aldermen were transformed into skittle-pins, and the police force into

bottles of Harvey’s sauce. Tried to squeak, but couldn’t. Then I

imagined that I was changed into the devil, and that Alderman Harmer was

St. Dunstan, tweaking my nose with a pair of red-hot tongs. This time, I

think, I did shout lustily. Awoke with the fright, and found my wife

pulling my nose vigorously, and calling me “My Lord!” Pulled off my

nightcap, and began to have an idea I was somebody, but could not tell

exactly who. Suddenly my eye rested upon the civic gown and chain, which

lay upon a chair by my bed-side:—the truth flashed upon my mind—I felt I

was a real Lord Mayor. I remembered clearly that yesterday I had been

sworn into office. I had a perfect recollection of the glass-coach, and

the sheriffs, and the men in armour, and the band playing “Jim along

Josey,” as we passed the Fleet Prison, and the glories of the city barge

at Blackfriars-bridge, and the enthusiastic delight with which the

assembled multitude witnessed—

A fellow falling into the water while crossing a (broken) plank into a

boat THE LORD MAYOR TAKING WATER.

I could also call to mind the dinner—the turtle, venison, and turbot—and

the popping of the corks from the throats of the champagne bottles. I

was conscious, too, that I had made a speech; but, beyond this point,

all the events of the night were lost in chaotic confusion. One thing,

however, was certain—I was a bonâ fide Lord Mayor—and being aware of the

arduous duties I had to perform, I resolved to enter upon them at once.

Accordingly I arose, and as some poet says—

“Commenced sacrificing to the Graces,

By putting on my breeches.”

Sent for a barber, and authorised him to remove the superfluous hair

from my chin—at the same time made him aware of the high honour I had

conferred upon him by placing the head of the city under his

razor—thought I detected the fellow’s tongue in his cheek, but couldn’t

be certain. Mem. Never employ the rascal again.

9 o’clock.—Dressed in full fig—sword very troublesome—getting

continually between my legs. Sat down to breakfast—her ladyship

complimented me on my appearance—said I looked the beau ideal of a

mayor—took a side glance at myself in the mirror—her ladyship was

perfectly right. Trotter the shoemaker announced—walked in with as much

freedom as he used to do into my shop in Coleman-street—smelt awfully of

“best calf” and “heavy sole”—shook me familiarly by the hand, and

actually called me “Bob.” The indignation of the Mayor was roused, and I

hinted to him that I did not understand such liberties, upon which the

fellow had the insolence to laugh in my face—couldn’t stand his

audacity, so quitted the room with strong marks of disgust.

10 o’clock.—Heard that a vagabond was singing “Jim Crow” on Tower-

hill—proceeded with a large body of the civic authorities to arrest him,

but after an arduous chase of half-an-hour we unfortunately lost him in

Houndsditch. Suppressed two illegal apple-stalls in the Minories, and

took up a couple of young black-legs, whom I detected playing at chuck-

farthing on Saffron-hill. Issued a proclamation against mad dogs,

cautioning all well-disposed persons to avoid their society.

12 o’clock.—Waited upon by the secretary of the New River Company with a

sample of the water they supply to the City—found that it was much

improved by compounding it with an equal portion of cognac—gave a

certificate accordingly. Lunched, and took a short nap in my cocked hat.

1 o’clock.—Police-court. Disposed of several cases summarily—everybody

in court amazed at the extraordinary acuteness I displayed, and the

rapidity with which I gave my decisions—they did not know that I always

privately tossed up—heads, complainant wins, and tails, defendant—this

is the fairest way after all—no being humbugged by hard swearing or

innocent looks—no sifting of witnesses—no weighing of evidence—no

deliberating—no hesitating—the thing is done in an instant—and, if the

guilty should escape, why the fault lies with fortune, and not with

justice.

3 o’clock.—Visited the Thames Tunnel—found Brunel a devilish deep

fellow—he explained to me the means by which he worked, and said he had

got nearly over all his difficulties—I suppose he meant to say he had

nearly got under them—at all events the tunnel, when completed, will be

a vast convenience to the metropolis, particularly to the lower classes.

From the Tunnel went to Billingsgate-market—confiscated a basket of

suspicious shrimps, and ordered them to be conveyed to the Mansion-

house. Mem. Have them for breakfast to-morrow. Return to dress for

dinner, having promised to take the chair at the Grand Annual

Metropolitan Anti-Hydro-without-gin-drinking Association.

Here a hiatus occurs in the MS.; but from cotemporary authorities we are

enabled to state that his lordship was conveyed home at two o’clock on

the following morning, by some jolly companions.

“Slowly and sadly they smoothed his bed, And they told his wife and

daughter To give him, next day, a couple of red- Herrings and soda-

water.”

THE LOVES OF THE PLANTS. The gay Daffodilly, an amorous blade,

Stole out of his bed in the dark,

And calling his brother, Jon-Quil, forth he stray’d

To breathe his love vows to a Violet maid

Who dwelt in a neighbouring park.

A spiteful old Nettle-aunt frown’d on their love;

But Daffy, who laugh’d at her power,

A Shepherd’s-purse slipp’d in the nurse’s Fox-glove,

Then up Jacob’s-ladder he crept to his love,

And stole to the young Virgin’s-bower.

The Maiden’s-blush Rose—and she seem’d all dismay’d,

Array’d in her white Lady’s-smock,

She call’d Mignonette—but the sly little jade,

That instant was hearing a sweet serenade

From the lips of a tall Hollyhock.

The Pheasant’s eye, always a mischievous wight,

For prying out something not good,

Avow’d that he peep’d through the keyhole that night;

And clearly discern’d, by a glow-worm’s pale light,

Their Two-faces-under-a-hood.

Old Dowager Peony, deaf as a door,

Who wish’d to know more of the facts,

Invited Dame Mustard and Miss Hellebore,

With Miss Periwinkle, and many friends more,

One evening to tea and to tracts.

The Butter-cups ranged, defamation ran high,

While every tongue join’d the debate;

Miss Sensitive said, ‘twixt a groan and a sigh,

Though she felt much concern’d—yet she thought her dear Vi—

Had grown rather bulbous of late.

Thus the tale spread about through the busy parterre:

Miss Columbine turn'd up her nose,

And the prude Lady Lavender said, with a stare,

That her friend, Mary-gold, had been heard to declare,

The creature had toy’d with the Rose.

Each Sage look’d severe, and each Cocks-comb look’d gay,

When Daffy to make their mind easy,

Miss Violet married one morning in May,

And, as sure as you live, before next Lady-day,

She brought him a Michaelmas-daisy.

NOTHING WONDERFUL. The Duke of Normandie accounts for the non-explosion

of his percussion-shells, by the fact of having incautiously used some

of M’Culloch’s pamphlets on the corn laws. If this be the case, no

person can be surprised at their not going off.

MODERN WAT TYLERS. The anxiety of the Whigs to repeal the timber duties

is quite pardonable, for, with their wooden heads, they doubtlessly look

upon it in the light of a poll-tax.

[pg 27] A young dark-skinned boy. Head of a Botecudo previous to

disfigurement.

A young dark-skinned man with chin and ear pendants. Head of a Butecudo

disfigured by chin and ear pendants.

A dark-skinned man with drooping ear lobes, wearing English clothes and

a monocle. Head of a Botecudo disfigured by civilisation.

CIVILISATION. “If an European,” says Sir Joshua Reynolds, in one of his

Discourses, “when he has cut off his beard, and put false hair on his

head, or bound up his own hair in formal, hard knots, as unlike nature

as he can make it, and after having rendered them immoveable by the help

of the fat of hogs, has covered the whole with flour, laid on by a

machine with the utmost regularity—if, when thus attired, he issues

forth and meets a Cherokee Indian who has bestowed as much time at his

toilet, and laid with equal care and attention his yellow and red ochre

on such parts of his forehead and cheeks as he judges most becoming,

whichever of these two despises the other for this attention to the

fashion of his country, whichever first feels himself provoked to laugh,

is the barbarian.”

Granting this, the popular advocates of civilisation certainly are not

the most civilised of individuals. They appear to consider yellow ochre

and peacocks’ feathers the climax of barbarism—marabouts and kalydor the

acme of refinement. A ring through the nose calls forth their deepest

pity—a diamond drop to the ear commands their highest respect. To them,

nothing can show a more degraded state of nature than a New Zealand

chief, with his distinctive coat of arms emblazoned on the skin of his

face; nor anything of greater social elevation than an English peer,

with the glittering label of his “nobility” tacked to his breast. To a

rational mind, the one is not a whit more barbarous than the other; they

being, as Sir Joshua observes, the real barbarians who, like these soi-

disant civilisers, would look upon their own monstrosities as the sole

standard of excellence.

The philosophy of the present age, however, is peculiarly the philosophy

of outsides. Few dive deeper into the human breast than the bosom of the

shirt. Who could doubt the heart that beats beneath a cambric front? or

who imagine that hand accustomed to dirty work which is enveloped in

white kid? What Prometheus was to the physical, Stultz is to the moral

man—the one made human beings out of clay, the other cuts characters out

of broad-cloth. Gentility is, with us, a thing of the goose and shears;

and nobility an attribute—not of the mind, but (supreme civilisation!)

of a garter!

Certain modern advocates appear to be devout believers in this external

philosophy. They are touchingly eloquent upon the savage state of those

who indulge in yellow ochre, but conveniently mute upon the condition of

those who prefer carmine. They are beautifully alive to the degradation

of that race of people which crushes the feet of its children, but

wonderfully dead to the barbarism of that race, nearer home, which

performs a like operation upon the ribs of its females. By them, also,

we are told that “words would manifestly fail in portraying so low a

state of morals as is pictured in the lineaments of an Australian

chief,”—a stretch of the outside philosophy which we certainly were not

prepared to meet with; for little did we dream that this noble science

could ever have attained such eminence, that men of intellect would be

able to discover immorality in particular noses, and crime in a certain

conformation of the chin.

That an over-attention to the adornment of the person is a barbarism all

must allow; but that the pride which prompts the Esquimaux to stuff bits

of stone through a hole in his cheek, is a jot less refined than that

which urges the dowager-duchess to thrust coloured crystals through a

hole in her ear, certainly requires a peculiar kind of mental squint to

perceive. Surely there is as great a want of refinement among us, in

this respect, as among the natives of New Zealand. Why rush for subjects

for civilisation to the back woods of America, when thousands may be

found, any fine afternoon, in Regent-street? Why fly to Biddy Salamander

and Bulkabra, when the Queen of Beauty and Count D’Orsay have equally

urgent claims on the attention and sympathies of the civiliser?

On the subject of civilisation, two questions naturally present

themselves—the one, what is civilisation?—the other, have we such a

superabundance of that commodity among us, that we should think about

exporting it? To the former question, the journal especially devoted to

the subject has, to the best of our belief, never condescended a reply;

although, like the celebrated argument on the colour of the chameleon,

no two persons, perhaps, have the same idea of it. In what then, does

civilisation consist, and how is it to be generally promoted? Does it,

as Sir E.L. B—— would doubtlessly assure us, does it lie in a strict

adherence to the last month’s fashions; and is it to be propagated

throughout the world only by missionaries from Nugee’s, and by the

universal dissemination of curling-tongs and Macassar—patent leather

boots and opera hats—white cambric pocket-handkerchiefs and lavender-

water? Or, does it consist, as the Countess of B—— would endeavour to

convince us, in abstaining from partaking twice of fish, and from eating

peas with the knife? and is it to be made common among mankind only by

distributing silver forks and finger-glasses to barbarians, and printing

the Book of Etiquette for gratuitous circulation among them? Or, is it,

as the mild and humane Judge P—— would prove to us, a necessary result

of the Statutes at Large; and can it be rendered universal only by

sending out Jack Ketch as a missionary—by the introduction of rope-walks

in foreign parts, and the erection of gallows all over the world? Or, is

it, as the Archbishop of Canterbury contests, to be achieved solely by

the dissemination of bishops, and by diffusing among the poor benighted

negroes the blessings of sermons, tithes, and church rates?

Christianity, it has, on the other hand, been asserted, is the only

practical system of civilisation; but this is manifestly the idea of a

visionary. For ourselves, we must confess we incline to the opposite

opinion; and think either the bishops or Jack Ketch (we hardly know

which we prefer) by far the more rational means. Indeed, when we

consider the high state of civilisation which this country has attained,

and imagine for an instant the awful amount of distress which would

necessarily accrue from the general practice of Christianity among us,

even for a week, it is clear that the idea never could be entertained by

any moral or religious, mind. A week’s Christianity in England! What

would become of the lawyer, and parsons? It is too terrible to

contemplate.

[pg 28] NOUVEAU MANUEL DU VOYAGEUR. These are the continental-trip days.

All the world will be now a-touring. But every one is not a Dr. Bowring,

and it is rather convenient to be able to edge in a word now and then,

when these rascally foreigners will chatter in their own beastly jargon.

Ignorant pigs, not to accustom themselves to talk decent English! Il

Signor Marchese Cantini, the learned and illustrious author of “Hi,

diddlo-diddlino! Il gutto e’l violino!”, has just rendered immense

service to the trip-loving natives of these lovely isles, by preparing a

“Guide to Conversation,” that for utility and correctness of idiom

surpasses all previous attempts of the same kind. With it in one hand,

and a bagful of Napoléons or Zecchini in the other, the biggest dunce in

London—nay, even a schoolmaster—may travel from Boulogne to Naples and

back, with the utmost satisfaction to himself, and with substantial

profit to the people of these barbarous climes. The following is a

specimen of the way in which Il Signor has accomplished his undertaking.

It will be seen at a glance how well he has united the classical with

the utilitarian principle, clothing both in the purest dialect; ex.

gr.:—

THIS IS ENGLISH. THIS IS FRENCH. THIS IS ITALIAN. Does your mother know

you’re out? Madame, votre maman, sait-elle que vous n’êtes pas chez

vous? La vostra signora madre sa che siete uscito di casa? It won’t do,

Mr. Ferguson. Cela nese passera, Monsieur Ferguson, jamais! Questo non

fara cosi, il Signore Fergusoni! Who are you? Est-ce que vous aviez

jamais un père? Chi è vossignoria? All round my hat. Tout autour mon

chapeau. Tutto all’ interno del mio capello! Go it, ye cripples! C’est

ça! Battez-vous bien—boiteux; cr-r-r-r-matin! Bravo! bravo, stroppiati!

Ancora-ancora! Such a getting up-stairs! Diantre! comme on monte

l’escalier! Come si ha salito— è maraviglioso! Jump, Jim Crow. Sautez,

Monsiuer Jaques Corbeau! Salti, pergrazia, Signor Giamomo Corvo! It

would not be fair to rob the Signor of any more of his labour. It will

be seen that, on the principle of the Painter and his Cow, we have

distinctly written above each sentence the language it belongs to. It is

always better to obviate the possibility of mistakes.

THE OMNIBUS The horrors of an omnibus,

Indeed, I’ve cause to curse;

And if I ride in one again,

I hope ‘twill be my hearse.

If you a journey have to go,

And they make no delay,

’Tis ten to one you’re serv’d like curds,

They spill you on the WHEY.

A short time since my wife and I

A short call had to make,

And giving me a kiss, she said—

“A buss you’d better take!”

We journey’d on—two lively cads,

Were for our custom triers;

And in a twinkling we were fix’d

Fast by this pair of pliers!

My wife’s arm I had lock’d in mine,

But soon they forced her from it;

And she was lugg’d into the Sun,

And I into the Comet!

Jamm’d to a jelly, there I sat,

Each one against me pushing;

And my poor gouty legs seem’d made

For each one’s pins—a cushion!

My wife some time had gone before:

I urged the jarvey's speed,

When all at once the bus set off

At fearful pace, indeed!

I ask’d the coachee what caused this?

When thus his story ran:—

“Vy, a man shied at an oss, and so

An oss shied at a man!”

Oh, fearful crash! oh, fearful smash!

At such a rate we run,

That presently the Comet came

In contact with the Sun.

At that sad time each body felt,

As parting with its soul,

We were, indeed, a little whirl’d,

And shook from pole to pole!

Dunn, the miller of Wimbledon, has recently given his infant the

Christian name of Cardigan. If there is truth in the adage of “give a

dog a bad name and hang him,” the poor child has little else in

perspective than the gallows.

PRAY DON’T TELL THE GOVERNOR. A SONG OF TON. Why, y-e-s—‘twas rather

late last night;

In fact, past six this morning.

My rascal valet, in a fright,

Awoke, and gave me warning.

But what of that?—I’m very young.

And you’ve “been in the Oven,” or,

Like me, you’re wrong’d by rumour’s tongue,

So—pray don’t tell the Governor.1 1. The author is aware there exists a

legitimate rhyme for Porringer, but believes a match for governor lies

still in the terra incognita of allowable rhythm.

I dined a quarter after seven,

With Dashall of the Lancers;

Went to the opera at eleven,

To see the ballet-dancers.

From thence I saunter’d to the club—

Fortune to me’s a sloven—or,

I surely must have won one rub,

But—mind! don’t tell the Governor!

I went to Ascot t’other day,

Drove Kitty in a tandem;

Upset it ’gainst a brewer’s dray—

I’d dined, so drove at random.

I betted high—an “outside” won—

I’d swear its hoofs were cloven, or

It ne’er the favourite horse had done,

But—don’t you tell the Governor.

My cottage ornée down at Kew,

So picturesque and pretty,

Cost me of thousands not a few,

To fit it up for Kitty.

She said it charm’d her fancy quite,

But (still I can’t help loving her)

She bolted with the plate one night—

You needn’t tell the Governor.

My creditors are growing queer,

Nay, threaten to be furious;

I’ll scan their paltry bills next year,

At present I’m not curious.

Such fellows are a monstrous bore,

So I and Harry Grosvenor

To-morrow start for Gallia’s shore,

And leave duns—to the Governor.

THE EXPLOSIVE BOX. Sir Hussey Vivian was relating to Sir Robert Peel the

failure of the Duke of Normandie’s experiment with a terrible self-

explosive box, which he had buried in a mound at Woolwich, in the

expectation that it would shortly blow up, but which still remains

there, to the great terror of the neighbourhood, who are afraid to

approach the spot where this destructive engine is interred. Sir Robert,

on hearing the circumstance, declared that Lord John Russell had served

him the same trick, by burying the corn-law question under the Treasury

bench. No one knew at what moment it might explode, and blow them to ——.

“The question,” he added, “now is—who will dig it out?”

EXCLUSIVE INTELLIGENCE. (From OUR West-end and “The Observer’s”

Correspondent.) We have every reason to believe, unless a very

respectable authority, on whom we are in the habit of relying, has

grievously imposed upon us, that a very illustrious personage has

consulted a certain exalted individual as to whether a certain other

person, no less exalted than the latter, but not so illustrious as the

former, shall be employed in a certain approaching event, which at

present is involved in the greatest uncertainty. Another individual, who

is more dignified than the third personage above alluded to, but not

nearly so illustrious as the first, and not half so exalted as the

second, has nothing whatever to do with the matter above hinted at, and

it is not at all probable that he will be ever in the smallest way mixed

up with it. For this purpose we have cautiously abstained from giving

his name, and indeed only allude to him that there may be no

misapprehension on this very delicate subject.

ANIMAL MAGNETISM. The Times gives a horrible description of some

mesmeric experiments by a M. Delafontaine, by which a boy was deprived

of all sensation. We suspect that some one has been operating upon the

Poor Law Commissioners, for their total want of feeling is a mesmeric

phenomenon.

ON SIR EDWARD LYTTON BULWER, BART., not M.P. FOR LINCOLN. That Bulwer’s

from fair Lincoln bann’d,

Doth threaten evil days;

For, having much waste time on hand,

Alas! he’ll scribble plays.

[pg 29] THE NEW HOUSE. “This is the House that Jack (Bull) built.” Once

there lived, as old histories learnedly show, a

Great sailor and shipbuilder, named MISTER NOAH,

Who a hulk put together, so wondrous—no doubt of it—

That all sorts of creatures could creep in and out of it.

Things with heads, and without heads, things dumb, things loquacious,

Things with tails, and things tail-less, things tame, and things

pugnacious;

Rats, lions, curs, geese, pigeons, toadies and donkeys,

Bears, dormice, and snakes, tigers, jackals, and monkeys:

In short, a collection so curious, that no man

E’er since could with NOAH compare as a show-man

At length, JOHNNY BULL, with that clever fat head of his,

Design’d a much stranger and comical edifice,

To be call’d his “NEW HOUSE”—a queer sort of menagerie

To hold all his beasts—with an eye to the Treasury.

Into this he has cramm’d such uncommon monstrosities,

Such animals rare, such unique curiosities,

That we wager a CROWN—not to speak it uncivil—

This HOUSE of BULL’S beats Noah’s Ark to the devil.

Lest you think that we bounce—the great fault, we confess, of men—

We proceed to detail some few things, as a specimen

Of what are to be found in this novel museum;

As it opens next month, you may all go and see ‘em.

Five Woods, of five shades, grain, and polish, and gilding,

Are used this diversified chamber in building.

Not a nail, bolt, or screw, you’ll discover to lurk in it,

Though six Smiths you will find every evening at work in it.

A Forman and Master you’ll see there appended too,

Whose words or instructions are never attended to.

A Leader, whom nobody follows; a pair o’ Knights,

With courage at ninety degrees of old Fahrenheit’s;

Full a hundred “Jim Crows,” wheeling round about—round about,

Yet only one Turner’s this House to be found about.

Of hogs-heads, Lord knows, there are plenty to spare of them,

But only one Cooper is kept to take care of them.

A Ryder’s maintain’d, but he’s no horse to get upon;

There’s a Packe too, and only one Pusey to set upon.

Two Palmers are kept, holy men, in this ill, grim age,

To make every night their Conservative pilgrimage.

A Fuller, for scouring old coats and redressing them;

A Taylor to fashion; and Mangles for pressing them.

Two Stewarts, two Fellowes, a Clerk, and a Baillie,

To keep order, yet each call’d to order are, daily.

A Duke, without dukedom—a matter uncommon—

And Bowes, the delight, the enchantment of woman.

This house has a Tennent, but ask for the rent of it,

He’d laugh at, and send you to Brussels or Ghent for it.

Of the animals properly call’d so, a sample

We’ll give to you gentlefolks now, for example:—

There are bores beyond count, of all ages and sizes,

Yet only one Hogg, who both learned and wise is.

There’s a Buck and a Roebuck, the latter a wicked one,

Whom few like to play with—he makes such a kick at one.

There are Hawkes and a Heron, with wings trimm’d to fly upon,

And claws to stick into what prey they set eye upon.

There’s a Fox, a smart cove, but, poor fellow, no tail he has;

And a Bruen—good tusks for a feed we’ll be bail he has.

There’s a Seale, and four Martens, with skins to our wishes;

There’s a Rae and two Roches, and all sorts of fishes;

There’s no sheep, but a Sheppard—“the last of the pigtails”—

And a Ramsbottom—chip of the old famous big tails.

Now to mention in brief a few trifles extraneous,

By connoisseurs class’d, “odds and ends miscellaneous:”—

There’s a couple of Bells—frights—nay, Hottentots real!

A Trollope, of elegance le beau ideal.

Of Browne, Green, and Scarlett men, surely a sack or more,

Besides three whole White men, preserved with a Blakemore.

There’s a Hill, and a Hutt, and a Kirk, and—astounding!

The entire of old Holland this house to be found in.

There’s a Flower, with a perfume so strong ‘twould upset ye all;

And the beauty of Somers is here found perpetual.

There’s a Bodkin, a Patten, a Rose, and a Currie,

And a man that’s still Hastie, though ne’er in a hurry.

There is Cole without smoke, a “sou’-West” without danger;

And a Grey, that to place is at present a stranger.

There’s a Peel,—but enough! if you’re a virtuoso

You’ll see for yourself, and next month you may do so;

When, if you don’t say this New House is a wonder,

We’re Dutchmen—that’s all!—and at once knuckle under.

WATERFORD ELECTION. The Tories at Waterford carried the day,

And the reign of the Rads is for ever now past;

For one who was Wyse he got out of the way,

And the hopes of the other proved Barron at last.

STATE OF TRADE. We are sorry to perceive that trade was never in a more

alarming state than at present. A general strike for wages has taken

place amongst the smiths. The carpenters have been dreadfully cut up;

and the shoemakers find, at the last, that it is impossible to make both

ends meet. The bakers complain that the pressure of the times is so

great, that they cannot get the bread to rise. The bricklayers swear

that the monopolists ought to be brought to the scaffold. The glaziers,

having taken some pains to discover the cause of the distress, declare

that they can see through the whole affair. The gardeners wish to get at

the root of the evil, and consequently have become radical reformers.

The laundresses have washed their hands clean of the business. The dyers

protest that things never looked so blue in their memory, as there is

but a slow demand for

A man carrying a flag, running from soldiers with swords bared FAST

COLOURS.

The butchers are reduced to their last stake. The weavers say their

lives hang by a single thread. The booksellers protest we must turn over

a new leaf. The ironmongers declare that the times are very hard indeed.

The cabmen say business is completely at a stand. The watermen are all

aground. The tailors object to the government measures;—and the

undertakers think that affairs are assuming a grave aspect. Public

credit, too, is tottering;—nobody will take doctors’ draughts, and it is

difficult to obtain cash for the best bills (of the play). An extensive

brandy-ball merchant in the neighbourhood of Oxford-street has called a

meeting of his creditors; and serious apprehensions are entertained that

a large manufacturer of lollypops in the Haymarket will be unable to

meet his heavy liabilities. Two watchmakers in the city have stopped

this morning, and what is more extraordinary, their watches have

“stopped” too.

THE NORMANDIE “NO GO.” The figure, stuffed with shavings, of a French

grenadier, constructed by the Duke of Normandie, and exhibited by him

recently at Woolwich, which he stated would explode if fired at by

bullets of his own construction, possitively objected to being blown up

in such a ridiculous manner; and though several balls were discharged at

the man of shavings, he showed no disposition to move. The Duke waxed

exceedingly wroth at the coolness of his soldier, and swore, if he had

been a true Frenchman, he would have gone off at the first fire.

A CONUNDRUM BY COL. SIBTHORP. “What’s the difference between the top of

a mountain and a person afflicted with any disorder?”—“One’s a summit of

a hill, and the other’s ill of a summut.”

A CLASSICAL INSCRIPTION FOR A CIGAR CASE. ?? ßa?????? d???µa ?aß?, s?

??? F????.—EURIPIDES.

FREE TRANSLATION. “Accept this gift of To-Baccha—cigar fellow.”

FASHIONS FOR THE PRESENT WEEK. Though the dog-days have not yet

commenced, muzzlin is very general, and a new sort of shally, called

shilly-shally, is getting remarkably prevalent. Shots are still

considered the greatest hits, for those who are anxious to make a good

impression; flounces are out in the morning, and tucks in at dinner-

parties, the latter being excessively full, and much sought after. At

conversaziones, puffs are very usual, and sleeves are not so tight as

before, to allow of their being laughed in; jewels are not now to be met

with in the head, which is left au naturel—that is to say, as vacant as

possible.

“Why is the Gazette like a Frenchman’s letter?”—“Because it is full of

broken English.”

BREACH OF PRIVILEGE. In the strangers’ gallery in the American house of

representatives, the following notice is posted up:—“Gentlemen will be

pleased not to place their feet on the boards in front of the gallery,

as the dirt from them falls down on the senators’ heads.” In our English

House of Commons, this pleasant penchant for dirt-throwing is practised

by the members instead of the strangers. It is quite amusing to see with

what energy O’Connell and Lord Stanley are wont to bespatter and heap

dirt on each other’s heads in their legislative squabbles!

SHOCKING WANT OF SYMPATHY. Sir Peter Laurie has made a sad complaint to

the Lord Mayor, of the slippery state of the wooden pavement in the

Poultry, and strongly recommended the immediate removal of the blocks.

This is most barbarous conduct on the part of Sir Peter. Has he lost all

natural affection for his kindred, that he should seek to injure them in

public estimation? Has he no secret sympathy for the poor blocks whom he

has traduced? Let him lay his hand upon his head and confess that—

“A fellow feeling; makes us wondrous kind.”

[pg 30] PUNCH AND PEEL THE NEW CABINET. PUNCH.—Well, Sir Robert, have

you yet picked your men? Come, no mystery between friends. Besides,

consider your obligations to your old crony, Punch. Do you forget how I

stood by you on the Catholic question? Come, name, name! Who are to

pluck the golden pippins—who are to smack lips at the golden fish—who

are to chew the fine manchet loaves of Downing-street?

PEEL.—The truth is, my dear Punch—

PUNCH.—Stop. You may put on that demure look, expand your right-hand

fingers across the region where the courtesy of anatomy awards to

politicians a heart, and talk about truth as a certain old lady with a

paper lanthorn before her door may talk of chastity—you may do all this

on the hustings; but this is not Tamworth: besides, you are now elected;

so take one of these cigars—they were smuggled for me by my revered

friend Colonel Sibthorp—fill your glass, and out with the list.

PEEL.—(Rises and goes to the door, which he double locks; returns to his

seat, and takes from his waistcoat pocket a small piece of ass’s skin.)

I have jotted down a few names.

PUNCH.—And, I see, on very proper material. Read, Robert, read.

PEEL.—(In a mild voice and with a slight blush.)—“First Lord of the

Treasury, and Chancellor of the Exchequer, Sir Robert Peel!”

PUNCH.—Of course. Well?

PEEL.—“First Lord of the Admiralty—Duke of Buckingham.”

PUNCH.—An excellent man for the Admiralty. He has been at sea in

politics all his life.

PEEL.—“Secretary for Foreign Affairs—Earl of Aberdeen.”

PUNCH.—An admirable person for Foreign Affairs, especially if he

transacted ’em in Sierra Leone. Proceed.

PEEL.—“Lord Lieutenant of Ireland—Lord Wharncliffe.”

PUNCH.—Nothing could be better. Wharncliffe in Ireland! You might as

well appoint a red-hot poker to guard a powder magazine. Go on.

PEEL.—“Secretary for Home Department—Goulburn.”

PUNCH.—A most domestic gentleman; will take care of home, I am sure. Go

on.

PEEL.—“Lord Chancellor—Sir William Follett.”

PUNCH.—A capital appointment: Sir William loves the law as a spider

loves his spinning; and for the same reason Chancery cobwebs will be at

a premium.

PEEL.—“Secretary for the Colonies—Lord Stanley.”

PUNCH.—Would make a better Governor of Macquarrie Harbour; but go on.

PEEL.—“President of the Council—Duke of Wellington.”

PUNCH.—Think twice there.—The Duke will be a great check upon you. The

Duke is now a little too old a mouser to enjoy Tory tricks. He has

unfortunately a large amount of common sense; and how fatal must that

quality be to the genius of the Wharncliffes, the Goulburns, and the

Stanleys! Besides, the Duke has another grievous weakness—he won’t lie.

PEEL.—“Secretary for Ireland—Sir H. Hardinge.”

PUNCH.—Come, that will do. Wharncliffe, the flaming torch of Toryism,

and Hardinge the small lucifer. How Ireland will be enlightened, and how

oranges will go up!

PEEL.—“Lord Chamberlain—Duke of Beaufort.”

PUNCH.—Capital! The very politician for a Court carpet. Besides, he

knows the etiquette of every green-room from the Pavilion to the

Haymarket. He is, moreover, a member of the Garrick Club; and what, if

possible, speaks more for his State abilities—he used to drive the

Brighton coach!

PEEL.—“Ambassador at Paris—Lord Lyndhurst.”

PUNCH.—That’s something like. How the graces of the Palais Royal will

rejoice! There is a peculiar fitness in this appointment; for is not his

Lordship son-in-law to old Goldsmid, whilom editor of the Anti-Galliean,

and for many years an honoured and withal notorious resident of Paris!

Of course BEN D’ISRAELI, his Lordship’s friend, will get a slice of

secretaryship—may be allowed to nib a state quill, if he must not use

one. Well, go on.

PEEL.—That’s all at present. How d’ye think they read?

PUNCH.—Very glibly—like the summary of a Newgate Calendar. But the truth

is, I think we want a little new blood in the next Cabinet.

PEEL.—New blood! Explain, dear Punch.

PUNCH.—Why, most of your people are, unfortunately, tried men. Hence,

the people, knowing them as well as they know the contents of their own

breeches’ pockets, may not be gulled so long as if governed by those

whose tricks—I mean, whose capabilities—have not been so strongly

marked. With new men we have always the benefit of hope; and with hope

much swindling may be perpetrated.

PEEL.—But my Cabinet contains known men.

PUNCH.—That’s it; knowing them, hope is out of the question. Now, with

Ministers less notorious, the Cabinet farce might last a little longer.

I have put down a few names; here they are on a blank leaf of Jack

Sheppard.

PEEL.—A presentation copy, I perceive.

PUNCH.—-Why, it isn’t generally known; but all the morality, the wit,

and the pathos, of that work I wrote myself.

PEEL.—And I must say they’re quite worthy of you.

PUNCH.—I know it; but read—read Punch’s Cabinet.

PEEL (reads).—“First Lord of the Treasury, and Chancellor of the

Exchequer—the Wizard of the North.”

PUNCH.—And, wizard as he is, he’ll have his work to do. He, however,

promises that every four-pound loaf shall henceforth go as far as eight,

so that no alteration of the Corn Laws shall be necessary. He

furthermore promises to plant Blackheath and Government waste grounds

with sugar-cane, and to raise the penny post stamp to fourpence, in so

delicate a manner that nobody shall feel the extra expense. As for the

opposition, what will a man care for even the speeches of a Sibthorp—who

can catch any number of bullets, any weight of lead, in his teeth? Go

on.

PEEL.—“First Lord of the Admiralty—T.P. Cooke.”

PUNCH.—Is he not the very man? Who knows more about the true interests

of the navy? Who has beaten so many Frenchmen? Then think of his

hornpipe—the very shuffling for a minister.

PEEL.—“Secretary for Foreign Affairs—Gold dust Solomons.”

PUNCH.—Show me a better man. Consider the many dear relations he has

abroad; and then his admirable knowledge of the rates of exchange? Think

of his crucible. Why, he’d melt down all the crowns of Europe into a

coffee service for our gracious Queen, and turn the Pope’s tiara into

coral bells for the little Princess! And I ask you if such feats ain’t

the practical philosophy of all foreign policy? Go on.

PEEL.—“Lord Lieutenant of Ireland—Henry Moreton Dyer.”

PUNCH.—An admirable person. As Ireland is the hotbed of all crimes, do

we not want a Lord Lieutenant who shall be able to assess the true value

of every indiscretion, from simple murder to compound larceny? As every

Irishman may in a few months be in prison, I want a Lord Lieutenant who

shall be emphatically the prisoner’s friend. Go on.

PEEL.—“Secretary for Home Department—George Robins.”

PUNCH.—A man so intimately connected with the domestic affairs of the

influential classes of the country. Go on.

PEEL.—“Lord Chancellor—Mr. Dunn, barrister.”

PUNCH.—As it appears to me, the best protector of rich heiresses and

orphans. Go on.

PEEL.—“Secretary for the Colonies—Money Moses.”

PUNCH.—A man, you will allow, with a great stake, in fact, with all he

has, in one of our colonial possessions. Go on.

PEEL.—“President of the Council—Mrs. Fry.”

PUNCH.—A lady whose individual respectability may give a convenient

cloak to any policy. Go on.

PEEL.—“Secretary for Ireland—Henry Moreton Dyer’s footman.”

PUNCH.—On the venerable adage of “like master like man.” Go on.

PEEL.—“Lord Chamberlain—The boy Jones.”

PUNCH.—As one best knowing all the intricacies, from the Royal bed-

chamber to the scullery, of Buckingham Palace. Besides he will drive a

donkey-cart. Go on.

PEEL.—“Ambassador at Paris—Alfred Bunn, or any other translator of

French Operas.”

PUNCH.—A person who will have a continual sense of the necessities of

his country at home; and therefore, by his position, be enabled to send

us the earliest copies of M. Scribe’s printed dramas; or, in cases of

exigency, the manuscripts themselves. And now, Bobby, what think you of

Punch’s Cabinet?

PEEL.—Why, really, I did not think the country contained so much state

talent.

PUNCH.—That’s the narrowness of your philosophy; if you were to look

with an enlarged, a thinking mind, you’d soon perceive that the distance

was not so great from St. James’s to St. Giles’s—from the House of

Commons to the House of Correction. Well, do you accept my list?

PEEL.—Excuse me, my dear Punch, I must first try my own; when if that

fails—

PUNCH.—You’ll try mine? That’s a bargain.

[pg 31] PUNCH'S PENCILLINGS.--No. III. Scenes of a matron and a young

woman preparing for a party. THE EVENING PARTY.

PREPARATION. DECORATION.

REALIZATION. TERMINATION.

[pg 33] A FAIR OFFER In compliance with my usual practice, I send you

this letter, containing a trifling biographical sketch, and an offer of

my literary services. I don’t suppose you will accept them, treating me

as for forty-three years past all the journals of this empire have done;

for I have offered my contributions to them all—all. It was in the year

1798, that escaping from a French prison (that of Toulon, where I had

been condemned to the hulks for forgery)—I say, from a French prison,

but to find myself incarcerated in an English dungeon (fraudulent

bankruptcy, implicated in swindling transactions, falsification of

accounts, and contempt of court), I began to amuse my hours of

imprisonment by literary composition.

I sent in that year my “Apology for the Corsican,” relative to die

murder of Captain Wright, to the late Mr. Perry, of the Morning

Chronicle, preparing an answer to the same in the Times journal; but as

the apology was not accepted (though the argument of it was quite clear,

and much to my credit), so neither was the answer received—a sublime

piece, Mr. PUNCH, an unanswerable answer.

In the year 1799, I made an attempt on the journal of the late Reverend

Mr. Thomas Hill, then fast sinking in years; but he had ill-treated my

father, pursuing him before Mr. Justice Fielding for robbing him of a

snuff-box, in the year 1740; and he continued his resentment towards my

father’s unoffending son. I was cruelly rebuffed by Mr. Hill, as indeed

I have been by every other newspaper proprietor.

No; there is not a single periodical print which has appeared for forty-

three years since, to which I did not make some application. I have by

me essays and fugitive pieces in fourteen trunks, seven carpet bags of

trifles in verse, and a portmanteau with best part of an epic poem,

which it does not become me to praise. I have no less than four hundred

and ninety-five acts of dramatic composition, which have been rejected

even by the Syncretic Association.

Such is the set that for forty-three years has been made against a man

of genius by an envious literary world! Are you going to follow in its

wake? Ha, ha, ha! no less than seven thousand three hundred times (the

exact number of my applications) have I asked that question. Think well

before you reject me, Mr. PUNCH—think well, and at least listen to what

I have to say.

It is this: I am not wishing any longer to come forward with tragedies,

epics, essays, or original compositions. I am old now—morose in temper,

troubled with poverty, jaundice, imprisonment, and habitual indigestion.

I hate everybody, and, with the exception of gin-and-water, everything.

I know every language, both in the known and unknown worlds; I am

profoundly ignorant of history, or indeed of any other useful science,

but have a smattering of all. I am excellently qualified to judge and

lash the vices of the age, having experienced, I may almost say, every

one of them in my own person. The immortal and immoral Goethe, that

celebrated sage of Germany, has made exactly the same confession.

I have a few and curious collection of Latin and Greek quotations.

And what is the result I draw from this? This simple one—that, of all

men living, I am the most qualified to be a CRITIC, and hereby offer

myself to your notice in that capacity.

Recollect, I am always at Home—Fleet Prison, Letter L, fourth staircase,

paupers’-ward—for a guinea, and a bottle of Hodges’ Cordial, I will do

anything. I will, for that sum, cheerfully abuse my own father or

mother. I can smash Shakspeare; I can prove Milton to be a driveller, or

the contrary: but, for preference, take, as I have said, the abusive

line.

Send me over then, Mr. P., any person’s works whose sacrifice you may

require. I will cut him up, sir; I will flay him—flagellate him—finish

him! You had better not send me (unless you have a private grudge

against the authors, when I am of course at your service)—you had better

not send me any works of real merit; for I am infallibly prepared to

show that there is not any merit in them. I have not been one of the

great unread for forty-three years, without turning my misfortunes to

some account. Sir, I know how to make use of my adversity. I have been

accused, and rightfully too, of swindling, forgery, and slander. I have

been many times kicked down stairs. I am totally deficient in personal

courage; but, though I can’t fight, I can rail, ay, and well. Send me

somebody’s works, and you’ll see how I will treat them.

Will you have personal scandal? I am your man. I will swear away the

character, not only of an author, but of his whole family—the female

members of it especially. Do you suppose I care for being beaten? Bah! I

no more care for a flogging than a boy does at Eton: and only let the

flogger beware—I will be a match for him, I warrant you. The man who

beats me is a coward; for he knows I won’t resist. Let the dastard

strike me then, or leave me, as he likes; but, for a choice, I prefer

abusing women, who have no brothers or guardians; for, regarding a

thrashing with indifference, I am not such a ninny as to prefer it. And

here you have an accurate account of my habits, history, and

disposition.

Farewell, sir; if I can be useful to you, command me. If you insert this

letter, you will, of course, pay for it, upon my order to that effect. I

say this, lest an unprincipled wife and children should apply to you for

money. They are in a state of starvation, and will scruple at no

dastardly stratagem to procure money. I spent every shilling of Mrs.

Jenkinson’s property forty-five years ago.

I am, sir, your humble servant, DIOGENES JENKINSON,

Son of the late Ephraim Jenkinson, well known to Dr. O. Goldsmith; the

Rev. — Primrose, D.D., Vicar of Wakefield; Doctor Johnson, of Dictionary

celebrity; and other literary gentlemen of the last century.

[We gratefully accept the offer of Mr. Diogenes Jenkinson, whose

qualifications render him admirably adapted to fill a situation which

Mr. John Ketch has most unhandsomely resigned, doubtlessly stimulated

thereto by the probable accession to power of his old friends the

Tories. We like a man who dares to own himself—a Jenkinson.—ED.] FINE

ARTS. His Royal Highness Prince Albert, who has occasionally displayed a

knowledge and much liking for the Fine Arts, some time since expressed

an intimation to display his ability in sketching landscape from nature.

The Royal Academicians immediately assembled en masse; and as they

wisely imagined that it would be impolitic in them to let an opportunity

slip of not being the very foremost in the direction of matters

connected with royalty and their profession, offered, or rather thrust

forward, their services to arrange the landscape according to the

established rules of art laid down by this self-elected body of the

professors of the beauties of nature. St. James’s-park, within the

enclosure, having been hinted as the nearest and most suitable spot for

the royal essay, the Academicians were in active service at an early

hour of the appointed day: some busied themselves in making foreground

objects, by pulling down trees and heaping stones together from the

neighbouring macadamized stores; others were most fancifully spotting

the trees with whitewash and other mixtures, in imitation of moss and

lichens. The classical Howard was awfully industrious in grouping some

swans, together with several kind-hearted ladies from the adjoining

purlieus of Tothill-street, who had been most willingly secured as

models for water-nymphs. The most rabidly-engaged gentleman was Turner,

who, despite the remonstrances of his colleagues upon the expense

attendant upon his whimsical notions, would persist in making the grass

more natural by emptying large buckets of treacle and mustard about the

ground. Another old gentleman, whose name we cannot at this moment call

to recollection, spent the whole of his time in placing “a little man a-

fishing,” that having been for many years his fixed belief as the only

illustration of the pastoral and picturesque. In the meantime, to their

utter disappointment, however, his Royal Highness quietly strolled with

his sketch-book into another quarter.

A BARRISTER’S CARD. Mr. Briefless begs to inform the public and his

friends in general, that he has opened chambers in Pump-court.—N.B.

Please to go down the area steps.

In consequence of the general pressure for money, Mr. Briefless has

determined to do business at the following very reduced scale of prices;

and flatters himself, that having been very long a member of a

celebrated debating society, he will be found to possess the qualities

so essential to a legal advocate.

Motions of cause, 6s. 6d.—Usual charge, 10s. 5d. Undefended actions,

(from) 15s.—Usually (from) 2l. 2s. Actions for breach of promise (from)

1l. 1s.—Usually (from) 5l. 5s. to 500l. Ditto, with appeals to the

feelings, (from) 3l. 3s. Ditto, ditto, very superior, 5l. 5s. Ditto,

with tirades against the law (a highly approved mixture), 3l. 3s.

N.B. To the three last items there is an addition of five shillings for

a reply, should one be rendered requisite. Mr. Briefless begs to call

attention to the fact, that feeling the injustice that is done to the

public by the system of refreshers, he will in all cases, where he is

retained, take out his refreshers in brandy, rum, gin, ale, or porter.

Injured innocence carefully defended. Oppression and injustice

punctually persecuted. A liberal allowance to attorneys and solicitors.

A few old briefs wanted as dummies. Any one having a second-hand

coachman’s wig to dispose of may hear of a purchaser.

[pg 34] THE WIFE CATCHERS. A LEGEND OF MY UNCLE’S BOOTS. “Ah! sure a

pair was never seen,

More justly form’d—”

CHAPTER I. The Letter J formed by a dog sitting up in begging position

ack, said my uncle Ned to me one evening, as we sat facing each other,

on either side of the old oak table, over which, for the last thirty

years, my worthy kinsman’s best stories had been told, “Jack,” said he,

“do you remember the pair of yellow-topped boots that hung upon the peg

in the hall, before you went to college?”

“Certainly, uncle; they were called by every one, ‘The Wife Catchers.’”

“Well, Jack, many a title has been given more undeservedly—many a rich

heiress they were the means of bringing into our family. But they are no

more, Jack. I lost the venerated relics just one week after your poor

dear aunt departed this life.”

My uncle drew out his bandanna handkerchief and applied it to his eyes;

but I cannot be positive to which of the family relics this tribute of

affectionate recollection was paid.

“Peace be with their soles!” said I, solemnly. “By what fatal chance did

our old friends slip off the peg?”

“Alas!” replied my uncle, “it was a melancholy accident; and as I

perceive you take an interest in their fate, I will relate it to you.

But first fill your glass, Jack; you need not be afraid of this stuff;

it never saw the face of a gauger. Come, no skylights; ’tis as mild as

new milk; there’s not a head-ache in a hogshead of it.”

To encourage me by his example, my uncle grasped the huge black case-

bottle which stood before him, and began to manufacture a tumbler of

punch according to Father Tom’s popular receipt.

Whilst he is engaged in this pleasing task, I will give my readers a

pen-and-ink sketch of my respected relative. Fancy a man declining from

his fiftieth year, but fresh, vigorous, and with a greenness in his age

that might put to the blush some of our modern hotbed-reared youths,

with the best of whom he could cross a country on the back of his

favourite hunter, Cruiskeen, and when the day’s sport was over, could

put a score of them under the aforementioned oak table—which, by the

way, was frequently the only one of the company that kept its legs upon

these occasions of Hibernian hospitality. I think I behold him now, with

his open, benevolent brow, thinly covered with grey hair, his full blue

eye and florid cheek, which glowed like the sunny side of a golden-

pippin that the winter’s frost had ripened without shrivelling. But as

he has finished the admixture of his punch, I will leave him to speak

for himself.

“You know, Jack,” said he, after gulping down nearly half the newly-

mixed tumbler, by way of sample, “you know that our family can lay no

claim to antiquity; in fact, our pedigree ascends no higher, according

to the most authentic records, than Shawn Duffy, my grandfather, who

rented a small patch of ground on the sea-coast, which was such a

barren, unprofitable spot, that it was then, and is to this day, called

‘The Devil’s Half-acre.’ And well it merited the name, for if poor Shawn

was to break his heart at it, he never could get a better crop than

thistles or ragweed off it. But though the curse of sterility seemed to

have fallen on the land, Fortune, in order to recompense Shawn for

Nature’s niggardliness, made the caverns and creeks of that portion of

the coast which bounded his farm towards the sea the favourite resort of

smugglers. Shawn, in the true spirit of Christian benevolence, was

reputed to have favoured those enterprising traders in their industry,

by assisting to convey their cargoes into the interior of the country.

It was on one of those expeditions, about five o’clock on a summer’s

morning, that a gauger unluckily met my grandfather carrying a bale of

tobacco on his back.”

Here my uncle paused in his recital, and leaning across the table till

his mouth was close to my ear, said, in a confidential whisper—

“Jack, do you consider killing a gauger—murder?”

“Undoubtedly, sir.”

“You do?” he replied, nodding his head significantly. “Then heaven

forgive my poor grandfather. However, it can’t be helped now. The gauger

was found dead, with an ugly fracture in his skull, the next day; and,

what was rather remarkable, Shawn Duffy began to thrive in the world

from that time forward. He was soon able to take an extensive farm, and,

in a little time, began to increase in wealth and importance. But it is

not so easy as some people imagine to shake off the remembrance of what

we have been, and it is still more difficult to make our friends

oblivious on that point, particularly if we have ascended in the scale

of respectability. Thus it was, that in spite of my grandfather’s

weighty purse, he could not succeed in prefixing Mister to his name;

find he continued for a long time to be known as plain ‘Shawn Duffy, of

the Devil’s Half-acre.’ It was undoubtedly a most diabolic address; but

Shawn was a man of considerable strength of mind, as well as of muscle,

and he resolved to become a juntleman, despite this damning

reminiscence. Vulgarity, it is said, sticks to a man like a limpet to a

rock. Shawn knew the best way to rub it off would be by mixing with good

society. Dress, he always understood, was the best passport he could

bring for admission within the pale of gentility; accordingly, he boldly

attempted to pass the boundary of plebeianism, by appearing one fine

morning at the fair of Ballybreesthawn in a flaming red waistcoat, an

elegant oarline22. A beaver hat. hat, a pair of buckskin breeches, and a

new pair of yellow-topped boots, which, with the assistance of large

plated spurs, and a heavy silver-mounted whip, took the shine out of the

smartest squireens at the fair.

“Fortunately for the success of my grandfather’s invasion of the

aristocratic rights, it occurred on the eve of a general election, and

as he had the command of six or eight votes in the county, his interest

was a matter of some importance to the candidates. Be that as it may, it

was with feelings little short of absolute dismay, that the respectable

inhabitants of the extensive village of Ballybreesthawn beheld the

metamorphosed tenant of ‘The Devil’s Half-acre,’ walking arm-in-arm down

the street with Sir Denis Daly, the popular candidate. At all events,

this public and familiar promenade had the effect of establishing Mister

John Duffy’s dubious gentility. He was invited to dine the same day by

the attorney; and on the following night the apothecary proposed his

admission as a member of the Ballybreesthawn Liberal reading-room. It

was even whispered that Bill Costigan, who went twice a-year to Dublin

for goods, was trying to strike up a match between Shawn, who was a hale

widower, and his aunt, an ancient spinster, who was set down by report

as a fortune of seven hundred pounds. Negotiations were actually set on

foot, and several preliminary bottles of potteen had been drunk by the

parties concerned, when, unfortunately, in the high road to happiness,

my poor grandfather caught a fever, and popped off, to the inexpressible

grief of the expectant bride, who declared her intention of dying in the

virgin state; to which resolution, there being no dissentient voice, it

was carried nem. con.

“Thus died the illustrious founder of our family; but happy was it for

posterity that the yellow-topped boots did not die along with him;

these, with the red waistcoat, the leather breeches, and plated spurs,

remained to raise the fortunes of our house to a higher station. The

waistcoat has been long since numbered with the waistcoats before the

flood; the buckskins, made of ‘sterner stuff,’ stood the wear and tear

of the world for a length of time, but at last were put out of

commission; while the boots, more fortunate or tougher than their

leathern companions, endured more than forty years of actual service

through all the ramifications of our extensive family. In this time they

had suffered many dilapidations; but by the care and ingenuity of the

family cobbler, they were always kept in tolerable order, and performed

their duty with great credit to themselves, until an unlucky accident

deprived me of my old and valued friends.”

POOR JOHN BULL. That knowing jockey Sir Robert Peel has stated that the

old charger, John Bull, is, from over-feeding, growing restive and

unmanageable—kicking up his heels, and playing sundry tricks extremely

unbecoming in an animal of his advanced age and many infirmities. To

keep down this playful spirit, Sir Robert proposes that a new burthen be

placed upon his back in the shape of a house-tax, pledging himself that

it shall be heavy enough to effect the desired purpose. Commend us to

these Tories—they are rare fellows for

An overweight man astride a horse that is down on its knees. BREAKING A

HORSE.

A STRONG RESEMBLANCE. Sir Edward Lytton Bulwer has frequently been

accused of identifying himself with the heroes of his novels. His late

treatment at Lincoln leaves no doubt of his identity with

A PUNCH character is warding off a large black man in colonial regalia

who is presenting a white woman with a black baby. THE DISOWNED.

A PRUDENT CHANGE. “So Lord John Russell is married,” said one of the

Carlton Club loungers to Colonel Sibthorp the other morning. “Yes,”

replied that gallant punster; “his Lordship is at length convinced that

his talents will be better employed in the management of the Home than

the Colonial department.”

[pg 35] THE ABOVE-BRIDGE NAVY. AN ARTICLE INTENDED FOR THE “QUARTERLY

REVIEW,” BUT FALLEN INTO THE HANDS OF “PUNCH.” —Hours of the Starting of

the Boats of the Iron Steam Boat Company. London: 1841. —Notes of a

Passenger on Board the Bachelor, during a Voyage from Old Swan Pier,

London Bridge, to the Red House, Battersea. CATNACH: 1840. —Rule

Britannia, a Song. London: 1694. —Two Years before the Mast. CUNNINGHAM.

London. —Checks issued by the London and Westminster Steam Boat Company.

CATTARNS AND FRY. At a time when the glory of England stands—like a door

shutting or opening either way—entirely upon a pivot; when the hostile

attitude of enemies abroad threatens not more, nor perhaps less, than

the antagonistic posture of foes at home—at such a time there is at

least a yet undug and hitherto unexplored mine of satisfaction in the

refreshing fact, that the Thames is fostering in his bosom an entirely

new navy, calculated to bid defiance to the foe—should he ever come—in

the very heart and lungs, the very bowels and vitals, the very liver and

lungs, or, in one emphatic word, the very pluck of the metropolis. There

is not a more striking instance of the remarkable connexion between

little—very little—causes, and great—undeniably great—effects, than the

extraordinary origin, rise, progress, germ, development, and maturity,

of the above-bridge navy, the bringing of which prominently before the

public, who may owe to that navy at some future—we hope so incalculably

distant as never to have a chance of arriving—day, the salvation of

their lives, the protection of their hearths, the inviolability of their

street-doors, and the security of their properties. Sprung from a little

knot of (we wish we could say “jolly young,” though truth compels us to

proclaim) far from jolly, and decidedly old, “watermen,” the above-

bridge navy, whose shattered and unfrequented wherries were always “in

want of a fare,” may now boast of covering the bosom of the Thames with

its fleet of steamers; thus, as it were, bringing the substantial piers

of London Bridge within a stone’s throw—if we may be allowed to pitch it

so remarkably strong—of the once remote regions of the Beach33.

Chelsea., and annihilating, as it were, the distance between sombre

southwark and bloom-breathing Battersea.

The establishment of this little fleet may well be a proud reflection to

those shareholders who, if they have no dividend in specie, have another

species of dividend in the swelling gratification with which the heart

of every one must be inflated, as, on seeing one of the noble craft dart

with the tide through the arches—supposing, of course, it does not

strike against them—of Westminster Bridge, he is enabled mentally to

exclaim, “There goes some of my capital!” But if the pride of the

proprietor—if he can be called a proprietor who derives nothing from his

property—be great, what must be the feelings of the captain to whose

guidance the bark is committed! We can scarcely conceive a nobler

subject of contemplation than one of those once indigent—not to say

absolutely done up—watermen, perched proudly on the summit of a paddle-

box, and thinking—as he very likely does, particularly when the vessel

swags and sways from side to side—of the height he stands upon.

It may be, and has been, urged by some, that the Thames is not exactly

the place to form the naval character; that a habit of braving the

“dangers of the deep” is hardly to be acquired where one may walk across

at low tide, on account of the water being so confoundedly shallow: but

these are cavillings which the lofty and truly patriotic mind will at

once and indignantly repudiate. The humble urchin, whose sole duty

consists in throwing out a rope to each pier, and holding hard by it

while the vessel stops, may one day be destined for some higher service:

and where is the English bosom that will not beat at the thought, that

the dirty lad below, whose exclamation of “Ease her!—stop her!—one turn

ahead!”—may one day be destined to give the word of command on the

quarterdeck, and receive, in the shape of a cannon-ball, a glorious

full-stop to his honourable services!

Looking as we do at the above-bridge navy, in a large and national

light, we are not inclined to go into critical details, such as are to

be met with, passim, in the shrewd and amusing work of “The Passenger on

board the Bachelor.” There may be something in the objection, that there

is no getting comfortably into one of these boats when one desires to go

by it. It may be true, that a boy’s neglecting “to hold” sufficiently

“hard,” may keep the steamer vibrating and Sliding about, within a yard

of the pier, without approaching it. But these are small considerations,

and we are not sure that the necessity of keeping a sharp look out, and

jumping aboard at precisely the right time, does not keep up that

national ingenuity which is not the least valuable part of the English

character. In the same light are we disposed to regard the occasional

running aground of these boats, which, at all events, is a fine

practical lesson of patience to the passengers. The collisions are not

so much to our taste, and these, we think, though useful to a certain

extent for inculcating caution, should be resorted to as rarely as

possible.

We have not gone into the system of signals and “hand motions,” if we

may be allowed to use a legal term, by which the whole of this navy is

regulated; but these, and other details, may, perhaps, be the subject of

some future article for we are partial to

A sailor picking the pocket of a man dozing at a bar table. TAKING IT

EASY.

CORRESPONDENCE. Newcastle-street, July —, 1841.

MR. PUNCH,—Little did I think wen i’ve bin a gaping and starin’ at you

in the streats, that i shud ever happli to you for gustice. Isntet a

shame that peeple puts advurtusmints in the papers for a howsmaid for a

lark, as it puts all the poor survents out of plaice into a dredfool

situashun.

As i alwuss gets a peep at the paper on the landin’ as i takes it up for

breckfus, i was unfoughtunite enuf to see a para—thingem-me-bob—for a

howsmaid, wanted in a nobbleman’s fameli. On course, a young woman has a

rite to better hursef if she can; so I makes up my mind at wunce—has i

oney has sicks pouns a ear, and finds my own t and shuggar—i makes up my

mind to arsk for a day out; which, has the cold mutting was jest enuf

for mastur and missus without me, was grarnted me. I soon clears up the

kitshun, and goes up stares to clean mysef. I puts on my silk gronin-

napple gownd, and my lase pillowrin, likewise my himitashun vermin

tippit, (give me by my cussen Harry, who keeps kumpany with me on hot-

dinner days), also my tuskin bonnit, parrersole, and blacbag; and i

takes mysef orf to South-street, but what was my felines, wen, on

wringing the belle, a boy anser’d the daw, with two roes of brarse beeds

down his jacket.

“Can i speek a word with the futman?” says i, in my ingaugingist manner.

“i’m futman,” says he.

“Then the cook,” says i.

“We arn’t no cook,” says he.

“No cook!” says i, almose putrifide with surprise; “you must be jokin’”—

“Jokin’,” says he; “do you no who lives here?”

“Not exacly,” says i.

“Lord Milburn,” says he.

i thort i shud have dropt on the step, as a glimmerin’ of the doo shot

aX my mine.

“Then you don’t want no howsmaid?” says i.

“Howsmaid!” says the boy; “go to blazes: (What could he mean by

A cart of people carrying torches racing towards a burning building.

GOING TO BLAZES?)

“No; i’ve toled fifty on ye so this mornin’—it’s a oaks.”

“Then more shame of Lord Milborn to do it,” says i; “he may want a place

hissef some day or other,” sayin’ of which i bounsed off the doorstep,

with all tho dignity i could command.

Now, what i wants to no is, wether i can’t summons his lordship for my

day out. Harry sais, should i ever come in contract with Lord Milborn,

i’m to trete him with the silent kontempt of

Yours truly,

An indignant looking woman. AN INDIGNANT HOUSEMAID.

A MOVING SCENE. The present occupants of the government premises in

Downing-street, whose leases will expire in a few days, are busily

employed packing up their small affairs before the new tenants come into

possession. It is a pitiful sight to behold these poor people taking

leave of their softly-stuffed seats, their rocking-chairs, their

footstools, slippers, cushions, and all those little official comforts

of which they nave been so cruelly deprived. That man must, indeed, be

hard-hearted who would refuse to sympathise with their sorrows, or to

uplift his voice in the doleful Whig chorus, when he hears—

The Jack, King, and Queen of Hearts with tears running down their faces.

THE PACK IN FULL CRY.

[pg 36] THE DRAMA DUCROW AT SADLER’S WELLS. When, in a melo-drama, the

bride is placing her foot upon the first step of the altar, and

Ruffiaano tears her away, far from the grasp of her lover; when a rich

uncle in a farce dies to oblige a starving author in a garret; when, two

rivals duellise with toasting-forks; when such things are plotted and

acted in the theatre, hypercritics murmur at their improbability; but

compare them with the haps of the drama off the stage, and they become

the veriest of commonplaces. This is a world of change: the French have

invaded Algiers, British arms are doing mortal damage in the Celestial

Empire, Poulett Thomson has gone over to Canada, and oh! wonder of

wonders! Astley’s has removed to Sadler’s Wells!! The pyrotechnics of

the former have gone on a visit to the hydraulics of the latter, the red

fire of Astley’s has come in contact with the real water of the Wells,

yet, marvel superlative! the unnatural meeting has been successful—there

has not been a single hiss.

What was the use of Sir Hugh Middleton bringing the New River to a

“head,” or of King Jamie buying shares in the speculation on purpose to

supply Sadler’s Wells with real water, if it is to be drained off from

under the stage to make way for horses? Shade of Dibdin! ghost of

Grimaldi! what would you have said in your day? To be sure ye were

guilty of pony races: they took place outside the theatre, but within

the walls, in the very cella of the aquatic temple, till now, never! We

wonder ye do not rise up and “pluck bright Honner from the vasty deep”

of his own tank.

Sawdust at Sadler’s Wells! What next, Mr. Merriman?

A silhouette standing on the back of a horse which is running in a

circus ring. A JUDGE GOING THE CIRCUIT.

If Macready had been engaged for Clown, and set down to sing “hot

codlins;” were Palmerston “secured” for Pierrot, or Lord Monteagle for

Jim Crow, who would have wondered? But to saddle “The Wells” with

horses—profanity unparalleled!

Spitefully predicting failure from this terrible declension of the

drama, we went, in a mood intensely ill-natured, to witness how the

“Horse of the Pyrenees” would behave himself at Sadler’s Wells. From the

piece so called we anticipated no amusement; we thought the regular

company would make but sorry equestrians, and, like the King of

Westphalia’s hussars, would prove totally inefficient, from not being

habituated to mount on horseback. Happily we were mistaken; nothing

could possibly go better than both the animals and the piece. The actors

acquitted themselves manfully, even including the horses. The mysterious

Arab threw no damp over the performances, for he was personated by Mr.

Dry. The little Saracen was performed so well by le petit Ducrow, that

we longed to see more of him. The desperate battle fought by about

sixteen supernumeraries at the pass of Castle Moura, was quite as

sanguinary as ever: the combats were perfection—the glory of the red

fire was nowise dimmed! It was magic, yes, it was magic! Mr. Widdicomb

was there!!

Thinking of magic and Mr. Widdicomb (of whom dark hints of

identification with the wandering Jew have been dropped—who, we know,

taught Prince George of Denmark horsemanship—who is mentioned by Addison

in the “Spectator,” by Dr. Johnson in the “Rambler,” and helped to put

out each of the three fires that have happened at Astley’s during the

last two centuries), brought by these considerations to a train of mind

highly susceptible of supernatural agency, we visited—

THE WIZARD OF THE NORTH, the illustrious professor of Phœnixsistography,

and other branches of the black art, the names of which are as

mysterious as their performance.

One only specimen of his prowess convinced us of his supernatural

talents. He politely solicited the loan of a bank-note—he was not choice

as to the amount or bank of issue. “It may be,” saith the play-bill, “a

Bank of England or provincial note, for any sum from five pounds to one

thousand.” His is better magic than Owen Glendower’s, for the note “did

come when he did call it!” for a confiding individual in the boxes

(dress circle of course) actually did lend him, the Wizard, a cool

hundred! Conceive the power, in a metaphysical sense, the conjuror must

have had over the lender’s mind! Was it animal magnetism?—was it terror

raised by his extraordinary performances, that spirited the cash out of

the pocket of the man? who, perhaps, thought that such supernatural

talents might be otherwise employed against his very existence, thus

occupying his perturbed soul with the alternative, “Your money or your

life!”

This subject is deeply interesting to actors out of engagements,

literary men, and people who “have seen better days”—individuals who

have brought this species of conjuration to a high state of perfection.

It is a new and important chapter in the “art of borrowing.” We perceive

in the Wizard’s advertisements he takes pupils, and offers to make them

proficient in any of his delusions at a guinea per trick. We intend to

put ourselves under his instructions for the bank-note trick, the moment

we can borrow one-pound-one for that purpose.

Besides this, the Wizard does a variety of things which made our hair

stand on end, even while reading their description in his play-bill. We

did not see him perform them. There was no occasion—the bank-note trick

convinced us—for the man who can borrow a hundred pounds whenever he

wants it can do anything.

Everybody ought to go and see him. Young ladies having a taste for

sentimental-looking men, who wear their hair à la jeune France; natural

historians who want to see guinea-pigs fly; gamesters who would like to

be made “fly” to a card trick or two; connoisseurs, who wish to see how

plum-pudding may be made in hats, will all be gratified by a visit to

the Adelphi.

MACBETH AT THE SURREY. We heard the “Macbeth choruses” exquisitely

performed, and saw the concluding combat furiously fought at this

theatre. This was all, appertaining unto Macbeth in which we could

detect a near approach to the meaning and purpose of the text, except

the performance of the Queen, by Mrs. H. Vining, who seemed to

understand the purport of the words she had to speak, and was,

consequently, inoffensive—a rare merit when Shakspere is attempted on

the other side of the Thames.

The qualifications demanded of an actor by the usual run of Surrey

audiences are lungs of undeniable efficiency, limbs which will admit of

every variety of contortion, and a talent for broad-sword combats. How,

then, could the new Macbeth—a Mr. Graham—think of choosing this theatre

for his first appearance? His deportment is quiet, and his voice weak.

It has, for instance, been usually thought, by most actors, that after a

gentleman has murdered his sovereign, and caused a similar peccadillo to

be committed upon his dearest friend, he would be, in some degree,

agitated, and put out of the even tenor of his way, when the ghost of

Banquo appears at the banquet. On such an occasion, John Kemble and

Edmund Kean used to think it advisable to start with an expression of

terror or horror; but Mr. Graham indulges us with a new reading. He

carefully places one foot somewhat in advance of the other, and puts his

hands together with the utmost deliberation. Again, he says mildly—

“Avaunt! and quit my sight! Let the earth hide thee!”

in a tone which would well befit the situation, if the text ran thus:—

“Dear me, how singular! Pray go!”

When he does attempt to vociferate, the asthmatic complaint under which

he evidently labours prevents him from delivering the sentences in more

copious instalments than the following:—

“I’ll fight—till—from my bones—my flesh—be hacked!”

We may be told that Mr. Graham cannot help his physical defects; but he

can help being an actor, and, above all, choosing a part which requires

great prowess of voice. In less trying characters, he may prove an

acquisition; for he showed no lack of judgment nor of acquaintance with

the conventional rules of the stage. At the Surrey, and in “Macbeth,” he

is entirely out of his element. Above all, let him never play with Mr.

Hicks, whose energy in the combat scene, and ranting all through

Macduff, brought down “Brayvo, Hicks!” in showers. The contrast is

really too disadvantageous.

But the choruses! Never were they more bewitchingly performed. Leffler

sings the part of Hecate better than his best friends could have

anticipated; and, apart from the singing, Miss Romer’s acting in the

soprano witch, is picturesque in the extreme.

HOP INTELLIGENCE Fanny Elsler has made an enormous fortune by her trips

in America. Few pockets are so crammed by hops as hers.

Oscar Byrne, professor of the College Hornpipe to the London University,

had a long interview yesterday with Lord Palmerston to give his lordship

lessons in the new waltz step. The master complains that, despite a long

political life’s practice, the pupil does not turn quick enough. A

change was, however, apparent at the last lesson, and his lordship is

expected soon to be able to effect a complete rota-tory motion.

Mademoiselle Taglioni has left London for Germany, her fatherland, the

country of her pas.

The society for the promotion of civilization have engaged Mr. Tom

Matthews to teach the Hottentots the minuet-de-la-Cour and tumbling. He

departs with the other missionaries when the hot weather sets in.

Charles Kean is becoming so popular with the jokers of the day, that we

have serious thoughts of reserving a corner entirely to his use. Amongst

the many hits at the young tragedian, the two following are not the

worst:—

EARLY ADVANTAGES. “Kean’s juvenile probation at Eton has done him good

service with the aristocratic patrons of the drama,” remarked a lady to

a witty friend of ours. “Yes, madam,” was the reply, “he seems to have

gained by Eaton what his father lost by drinking.”

BILL-STICKERS BEWARE. “How Webster puffs young Kean—he seems to

monopolise the walls!” said Wakley to his colleague, Tom Duncombe.

“Merely a realisation of the adage,—The weakest always goes to the

wall,” replied the idol of Finsbury.

PUNCH, OR THE LONDON CHARIVARI. VOL. 1. [pg 37] AUGUST 7, 1841. THE

WIFE-CATCHERS. A LEGEND OF MY UNCLE’S BOOTS. In Four Chapters. “His name

’tis proper you should hear,

’Twas Timothy Thady Mulligin:

And whenever he finish’d his tumbler of punch,

He always wished it full agin.”

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 1, Complete · 第 1 / 18 章