But the immediate effect on Dame Anieuse was only to render her more

desperate. She quitted her hold on the disputed garment, and fell

upon her husband with such a shower of blows that he hardly knew

which way to turn. She was thus, however, unconsciously exhausting

herself, and Sire Hains soon recovered. The battle now became fiercer

than ever, and the lady seemed to be gaining the upper hand, when

Sire Hains gave her a skilful blow in the ribs, which nearly broke

one of them, and considerably checked her ardour. Friend Symon here

interposed, with the praiseworthy aim of restoring peace before further

harm might be done, but in vain, for the lady was only rendered more

obstinate by her mishap; and he agreed that it was useless to interfere

before one had got a more decided advantage over the other. The fight

therefore went on, the two combatants having now seized each other by

the hair of the head, a mode of combat in which the advantages were

rather on the side of the male. At this moment one of the judges,

Dame Aupais, sympathising too much with Dame Anieuse, ventured some

words of encouragement, which drew upon her a severe rebuke from her

colleague, Symon, who intimated that if she interfered again there

might be two pairs of combatants instead of one. Meanwhile, Dame

Anieuse was becoming exhausted, and was evidently getting the worst

of the contest, until at length, staggering from a vigorous push, she

fell back into a large basket which lay behind her. Sire Hains stood

over her exultingly, and Symon, as umpire, pronounced him victorious.

He thereupon took possession of the disputed article of raiment, and

again invested himself with it, while the lady accepted faithfully the

conditions imposed upon her, and we are assured by the poet that she

was a good and obedient wife during the rest of her life.

[Illustration: MAN MASTERED.

[_From a rare print after Van Mecken._]]

In this story, which affords a curious picture of mediæval life, we

learn the origin of the proverb relating to the possession and the

wearing of the breeches. Hugues Piancelles concludes his _faiblau_ by

recommending every man who has a disobedient wife to treat her in the

same manner; and mediæval husbands appear, to have followed his device

without fear of laws against the ill-treatment of women.

Van Mecken, a Flemish artist who flourished in the fifteenth century,

has left a record of domestic strife in an engraving which shows the

wife as victor in the struggle for the breeches; and an ungenerous

victor she would seem to have been, judging from the picture, where

she is seen engaged at once in putting on the hard-won garments and

striking her husband on the head with a distaff. He, poor fellow, is

following, under compulsion, some merely feminine occupation, and seems

to find it uncongenial.

[Illustration: A JUDICIAL DUEL.

[_From an old German MS._]]

In Germany, during mediæval times, domestic differences were settled

by judicial duels between man and wife, and a regular code for their

proper conduct was observed. ‘The woman must be so prepared,’ so

the instructions run, ‘that a sleeve of her chemise extend a small

ell beyond her hand like a little sack: there indeed is put a stone

weighing iii pounds; and she has nothing else but her chemise, and that

is bound together between the legs with a lace. Then the man makes

himself ready in the pit over against his wife. He is buried therein up

to the girdle, and one hand is bound at the elbow to the side.’

The seventeenth century seems to have been prolific of domestic broils,

for an unusual number of pamphlets exist which have as their subject

the attempts of women to obtain the upper hand over their husbands.

One there is, called _Women’s Fegaries_, which is especially bitter. A

spirited woodcut on the cover shows a man and woman struggling for a

pair of breeches, which certainly would be no gain to either of them,

except as a trophy of victory, so immensely large are they. The woman

wields a ladle; the man brandishes something that may be either a sword

or a cudgel, and both seem in deadly earnest. The contents of this

counterblast to women’s efforts are extravagant and amusing; but you

shall judge for yourself:--

‘The proverb says, “There is no wit like the woman’s wit,” especially

in matters of mischief, their natures being more prone to evil than

good; for, being made of a knobby crooked rib, they contain something

in their manners and dispositions of the matter and form of which they

were created, as may be instanced in several examples, of which we

shall in this sheet of paper give you some of them.

‘At a town called _Stocking Pelham_, in the county [_sic_] of England,

not long ago there happened a terrible fray betwixt the man of the

house on one side, and his wife and his maid on the other side, and

though two to one be great odds at football, yet, by the strength

of his arm, and a good crab-tree cudgel, they felt by their bruised

sides that he had gotten the victory. Now, though the man’s name was

_William_, yet the wife for a great while did want her _Will_--I mean,

how to be revenged upon him--until at last she effected, by policy,

what she could not compass by strength; for he, putting his head out

of a window that had neither Glass nor Lettice belonging to it, but

only a riding shutter, he having no eyes behind him, she nimbly stept

to the shutter, and ran it up close to his neck, so that he was locked

fast, as in a Pillory; where, whilst the one kept him in, the other

with a great washing-beetle, belaboured his body, as your Seamen do

stock-fish. The maid-servant, a strong-docht wench, with both her hands

laying on, and at every blow saying:--

‘“_Remember how you beat my dame:_

_Now look for to be served the same._”

‘The poor man, to be rid of his tormentors, was glad to pray, crave,

and entreat, and promise whatsoever they would have him, vowing never

after to use Crab-tree Cudgel again, nor so much as to eat of Mustard,

if it were made of Verjuice, out of detestation to Crabs and Crab-trees.

‘_Thus, women, you may learn a ready way_

_To make resisting husbands to obey:_

_Although to baste your sides their fingers itches,_

_You may, by policy, obtain the breeches._

‘It is in the memory of man, since in _Black-Fryers_ a Taylor and his

Wife fell out about superiority. The Taylor fretted, and his Wife

scolded, whereupon this ninth part of a man challenged her out into

the street to try the conquest, having provided broom-staves there

for that purpose. Being both entered the lists, the woman thought it

best policy to begin first, and, catching up a Ram’s Horn, which lay

at her foot, she threw it at her husband, which by chance lighted on

his forehead at the great end, and stuck there as fast as ever it grew

upon the Ram’s head; which, having done, she ran in at the door again.

The Taylor, being mad to be served so, went to run after her, but,

making more haste than good speed, he ran his horn into the staple

of the door, where he was so entangled by his brow antlers, that he

could stir no further, which the woman perceiving, she got up one of

the broom-staves, and so belaboured poor _Pilgarlick_, that, in great

humility, he asked her forgiveness, and resigned the right of the

breeches up to her.

‘’Twas in the sound of _Clerkenwell_ bells, and therefore of long

standing, that a Plaisterer had gotten a most damnable Scold to his

wife, who used to fetch him from the Ale-house. One night, coming

home three-quarters drunk, she acted the part of _Zantippe_, and made

the house to Ring with her scolding. This music was so untunable in

her Husband’s Ears, that, getting a cudgel in his hands, he fell to

belabouring her until he made her to ask him for forgiveness, and

promise never to scold so again. Having thus, as he thought, got an

absolute conquest over her tongue, he went quietly to bed, where he

slept soundly, whilst she lay awake studying of mischief. In the

morning, before he awaked, she examined his pockets for money (the

common tricks of a good many women), but found nothing in them, save

only some lath nails; these did she take and set upright all about the

room, which done, she gets a Pail of Water in her hands, and, calling

aloud, commanded him to rise, which he refused to do; whereupon she

throws the pail of water upon the bed. This so vexed him that, starting

suddenly up, he went to run after her; when his naked feet lighting

upon the lath nails, he was forced to slacken his pursuit, being so

mortified with them that he could neither stand nor walk. Whereupon

his wife, taking the same cudgel he had beaten her withall the night

before, told him that _what was sauce for a Goose was sauce for a

Gander_, and so be-rib-roasted him, that with great penitency he now

asked her forgiveness, resigning the whole right and title of the

Breeches unto her, and that though he was superior to her in strength,

yet he was inferior to her in policy.’

‘_When as that women do themselves apply_

_To mischief, they perform it readily._

_Nothing will serve them when their fingers itches_

_Until such time they have attained the breeches._

_Be it to scold, to brangle, scratch, or fight,_

_Their hands are heavy though their tails are light._

‘In that part of _Albion_ which is called _Veal Country_, there

formerly lived a merry saddler who had gotten a scolding carrion to

wife that would frequent the ale-house almost every day, from which

he was forced to fetch her home at night, where he would bestow some

rib-roast upon her to give her a breathing that she might not grow

foggy with drinking so much ale. However, the woman did not take it

so kindly but that she vowed to be revenged upon him for it; and to

put her determination into practice, one day she asked two of her boon

companions to get her husband to the ale-house and make him drunk,

which they performed according to her desire, leading him home about

ten o’clock at night, and placing him in a chair with a good fire

before him, where he presently fell fast asleep: now had the woman

a fit opportunity to put her design into practice, when pulling out

his feet towards the fire, and the fire so near towards them as it

almost touched them, she went to bed, when quickly his shoes began

to fry, and his feet were mortified with the burning, so that he made

a most sad, dolorous noise. She, knowing the fish was caught that she

had laid wait for, went down with a good ashen wand in her hand. “You

ill-conditioned slave,” quoth she, “must you come home drunk and make

such a noise that one cannot rest in quiet for you? I will make you to

roar for something,” and thereupon fell on him with as much Fury as a

Pyrat doth on a Merchant’s bark. The poor Sadler was forced to endure

all, for he could not help himself; but, desiring her to be merciful,

he resigned up the breeches to her, she tryumphing in her double

conquest, first paying him who used to pay her, and, secondly, bringing

him into that condition that for three-quarters of a year afterwards he

did not stir out of doors to fetch her from the ale-house:--

‘_Women, like pismires, have their sting,_

_And several ways to pass their ends do bring._

_Their tongues are nimble, nor their hands crazy,_

_Although to work, each limb they have is lazy._

‘Many other examples might we instance of the imperiousness of women,

and what stratagems they have invented for gaining the Breeches from

their Husbands, but these I think may suffice for one single sheet of

paper, and, indeed, as many as can well be afforded for four Farthings;

but least any one should complain of a hard pennyworth, to make him

amends, I will afford him a song into the bargain:--

‘THE SONG.

‘_When women that they do meet together,_

_Their tongues do run all sorts of weather,_

_Their noses are short, and their tongues they are long,_

_And tittle, tittle, tattle is all their song._

‘Now that women (like the world) do grow worse and worse, I have read

in a very learned authour, viz., _Poor Robin’s Almanack_, how that

about two hundred and fifty years ago (as near as he could remember)

there was a great sickness almost throughout the whole world, wherein

there dyed Forty-five millions, eight hundred, seventy-three thousand,

six hundred and ninety-two good women, and of bad women only three

hundred, forty and four; by reason whereof there hath been such a

scarcity of good women ever since: the whole breed of them being almost

utterly extinct.’

* * * * *

And so an end. But the author of this pamphlet is not alone in his

satires of domestic infelicity. Here you shall see, in _The Woman to

the Plow_, how these things struck our forbears. He has good ideas,

this seventeenth-century versifier, but his gifts in the matter of

rhyme and rhythm are all too slight:--

THE WOMAN TO THE PLOW AND THE MAN TO THE HEN-ROOST;

OR, A FINE WAY TO CURE A COT QUEAN.

Both men and women, listen well,

A merry jest I will you tell,

Betwixt a good man and his wife

Who fell the other day at strife.

He chid her for her huswivery,

And she found fault as well as he.

He says:--

‘Sith you and I cannot agree,

Let’s change our work’--‘Content,’ quoth she.

‘My wheel and distaff, here, take thou,

And I will drive the cart and plow.’

This was concluded ’twixt them both:

To cart and plow the good wife goeth.

The good man he at home doth tarry,

To see that nothing doth miscarry.

An apron he before him put:

Judge:--Was not this a handsome slut?

He fleets the milk, he makes the cheese;

He gropes the hens, the ducks, and geese;

He brews and bakes as well’s he can;

But not as it should be done, poor man.

As he did make his cheese one day

Two pigs their bellies broke with whey:

Nothing that he in hand did take

Did come to good. Once he did bake,

And burnt the bread as black as a stock.

Another time he went to rock

The cradle, and threw the child o’ the floor,

And broke his nose, and hurt it sore.

He went to milk, one evening-tide,

A skittish cow, on the wrong side--

His pail was full of milk, God wot,

She kick’d and spilt it ev’ry jot:

Besides, she hit him a blow on th’ face

Which was scant well in six weeks’ space.

Thus was he served, and yet to dwell

On more misfortunes that befell

Before his apron he’d leave off,

Though all his neighbours did him scoff.

Now list and mark one pretty jest,

’Twill make you laugh above the rest.

As he to churn his butter went

One morning, with a good intent,

The cot-quean fool did surely dream,

For he had quite forgot the cream.

He churned all day with all his might,

And yet he could get no butter at night.

’Twere strange indeed, for me to utter

That without cream he could make butter.

Now having shew’d his huswivery,

Who did all things thus untowardly,

Unto the good wife I’ll turn my rhyme,

And tell you how she spent her time.

She used to drive the cart and plow,

But do’t well she knew not how.

She made so many banks i’ th’ ground,

He’d been better have given five pound

That she had never ta’en in hand,

So sorely she did spoil the land.

As she did go to sow likewise,

She made a feast for crows and pies,

She threw away a handful at a place,

And left all bare another space.

At the harrow she could not rule the mare,

But bid one land, and left two bare:

And shortly after, well-a-day,

As she came home with a load of hay,

She overthrew it, nay, and worse,

She broke the cart and kill’d a horse.

The goodman that time had ill-luck;

He let in the sow and killed a duck,

And, being grieved at his heart,

For loss on’s duck, his horse and cart,

The many hurts on both sides done,

His eyes did with salt water run.

‘Then now,’ quoth he, ‘full well I see,

The wheel’s for her, the plow’s for me.

I thee entreat,’ quoth he, ‘good wife,

To take my charge, and all my life

I’ll never meddle with huswivery more.’

The goodwife she was well content,

And about her huswivery she went;

He to hedging and to ditching,

Reaping, mowing, lading, pitching.

And let us hope that, like the Prince and Princess in the fairy tale,

they lived happily ever afterwards. But I have my doubts.

VI.--WOMEN IN MEN’S EMPLOYMENTS.

That Woman’s true profession is marriage is a fact commonly blinked

in these times when, owing to their greater numbers, it is become

inevitable that many women must go through life as spinsters. Not

every woman may become the mistress of a home in these days when the

proportion of females to males is growing larger and more evident

year by year: not all the women and girls can attain to that ideal

of marriage which they so ardently desire, now that women outnumber

the men in Great Britain and Ireland alone by nearly a million; and

so, to cover their failure in life, the unmarried have started the

heresy that woman’s mission is domination rather than submission; that

woman’s sphere of action and influence is not properly confined to the

home, but is rightly universal, and that marriage is an evil which

destroys their individuality. These failures, rightly to call those who

cannot achieve legalised coverture, are, of course, of all classes,

but chiefly and equally of course, they belong to the wage-earning

class, and must seek employment wherewith to support their existence

in an undesired spinsterhood. The growing competition of women with

one another in feminine employments, the higher education of modern

girls, the increasing tendency of men to defer marriage, or to remain

bachelors altogether--all these causes have led to woman’s turning

from the long-since overstocked markets for woman’s work to the more

highly-paid functions fulfilled by men. Then, also, the new employments

and professions evolved from the increasingly complex civilisation of

this dying nineteenth century, have been almost exclusively feminised

by the _femmes soles_ who are occupied nowadays as clerks, shorthand

writers, journalists, type-writers--_vulgo_ ‘typists’--doctors,

dentists, telephonists, telegraphists, decorators, photographers,

florists, and librarians. A lower social stratum takes to such

employments as match-box making, printers’ folding and bookbinding,

and a hundred other crafts. Where deftness of manipulation comes into

request these wage-earning women have proved their right to their new

places; but in the occupations of clerks, cashiers, telephonists,

telegraphists, and shorthand writers they have sufficiently

demonstrated their unfitness, and only retain their situations by

reason of the lower wages they are prepared to accept, in competition

with men, and through the sexual sentimentality which would rather

have a pretty woman to flirt with in the intervals of typewriting

than a merely useful and unornamental man. It may be inevitable,

and in accordance with the inexorable law of self-preservation,

that women will continue to elbow men from their stools; but woman

cannot reasonably expect, if she competes with man in the open market,

to receive the old-time deference and chivalric treatment--real or

assumed--that was hers when woman remained at home, and when the title

of spinster was not an empty form. She must be content to forego much

of the kindly usage that was hers before she became man’s competitor;

and if she fails in market overt, where chivalry has no place, why, she

has no just cause of complaint. If the time is past when women were

regarded as a cross between an angel and an idiot it is quite by her

own doing, and if she no longer receives the deference that is the due

of an angel, nor the compassionate consideration usually accorded an

idiot, no one is to blame but herself.

If she would be content to earn her wages in those manly employments

she has poached, and to refrain from the cry of triumph she cannot

forbear, she would be a much more gracious figure, and, indeed,

entitled to some sympathy; but foolish women are clamorously greedy

of self-glorification, and still instant, in and out of season, in

reviling the strength and mental agility of men which surpass their

own and forbid for ever the possibility of female domination. And yet

women, one might reasonably suppose, have no just cause of complaint

in the matter of their mental and physical inferiority. The feminine

quality of cunning has ever stood them in good stead, and by its aid

they have grasped advantages that could not have been theirs by right

of their muscles or their reason. Cunning has taught them to use their

shortcomings as claims for consideration, and to urge courtesy as

their due in order to handicap men in the race. In the same manner Mr.

Gladstone was wont, when all reasonable arguments had failed him, to

urge his age as a claim to attention and a compliance with his policy;

and, whenever a cricket match is played between an eleven of gentlemen

and a corresponding number of ladies, the men must fain tie one hand

behind their backs and fend as best they may with the other, and use a

stump in place of a bat. Again, when gloves are wagered on a race, who

ever heard of pretty Fanny paying when her wager was lost? You shall

see an instance of feminine unreasonableness in competition with man in

this tale of a race:--Mrs. Thornton, the wife of a Colonel Thornton,

rode on horseback, in 1804, a match with a Mr. Frost, on the York

racecourse. The course was four miles, and the stakes were 500 guineas,

even. The race was run before an immense concourse, and eventually

the lady lost! She could not, of course, considering her sex, contain

herself for indignation, and her letter to the _York Herald_ which

followed made complaint against Mr. Frost for having been lacking

in courtesy in ‘distancing her as much as he could.’ She challenged

that discourteous sportsman to another match, but he very rightly

considered that sport is masculine, and did not accept.

Many thousands of girls and unmarried women live nowadays upon their

earnings in a solitary existence. They are of all grades and classes;

they have entered the professions, and even invention is numbered among

their occupations, although the inability of women to originate is

notorious. According to a statement in the _Times_ of December, 1888,

‘out of 2500 patents issued to women by the Government of the United

States, none reveal a new principle.’

We have not many women inventors in these islands. Women have not had

sufficient courage or rashness for dabbling in applied science, or

meddling with mechanics. They owe even the sewing-machine, and all the

improvements upon its crude beginnings, to man, and would have been

content to wield the needle in slow and painful stitches for all time

but for his intervention.

It was left for the Government to bring the employment of women

forward, and successive Postmasters-General have sanctioned their

introduction to post-offices; but as post-office clerks they have

failed to give satisfaction. They readily assume official insolence,

and carry it to an extent unknown even to Foreign Office male clerks,

who were, before the introduction of women into the Civil Service,

supposed to have attained the utmost heights of ‘side’ and official

offensiveness. Many have been the bitter letters addressed to the

_Times_--that first resort of the aggrieved--upon the neglect and

contumely heaped upon the public by the Postmaster-General’s young

ladies. But this neglect and studied insolence has, it must be owned,

been chiefly shown by these Jacquettas in office to their own sex; and

ladies have been observed to wait, with rage and vexation, for the

tardy pleasure of female post-office clerks in condescending to notice

their presence.

At one time the business of post-offices became served almost entirely

by women. This was due not to any Governmental delusions upon the score

of their merits, but was owing entirely to a cheeseparing economy which

employed inferior wits at a lower wage than would have been acceptable

to men. Even such extremely busy offices as those of Ludgate Circus

and Lombard Street were filled with women, who elbowed men from their

stools, and became so ‘flurried’ in the press of business that they

frequently gave either too much change or too little over the counter,

or committed such vagaries as giving ten shillings’ worth of stamps

for half-a-crown; or were incapable of weighing letters and parcels

properly, so that the Post-office revenues were increased by packages

being more than sufficiently stamped, or else were augmented by the

fines levied upon addressees in cases where their inherent inability

to juggle with figures had caused inadequate prepayment. Indeed,

the woman who can reason from cause to effect, or can employ the

multiplication-table accurately (except under circumstances in which

time is no object) is as much a ‘sport’--as Professor Huxley might

say--as a white raven or a cat born with six legs.

The storm of indignation was so great over these unbusinesslike doings,

that even that elephantine creature--the Postmaster-General--was

moved,[4] and the chiefest of the City post-offices are served now by

men.

Revolted Woman: Past, present, and to come · 第 6 / 7 段