AMERICAN HONOUR.

About seventy-five years ago, there was at Charleston, in South

Carolina, a family consisting of several members. It belonged to the

middle class--that is to say, contained barristers, bankers,

merchants, solicitors, and so on--all of them animated, at least so

far as appears, by a high sense of honour and integrity. But noble

sentiments are no certain guarantee against poverty. One of the

members of the family in question became embarrassed, borrowed L.1000

of one of his relatives, but was soon after seized with paralysis,

and, having kept his bed five years, died, leaving behind him a widow

with several children. He could bequeath them no property, instead of

which they received as their inheritance high principles, and a strong

affection for the memory of their father. The widow also was, in this

respect, perfectly in harmony with her sons. By dint, therefore, of

prudence, industry, and economy, they amassed among them the sum of

L.400, which they rigidly appropriated to the repayment of a part of

their father's debt. The old man had, indeed, called them together

around his death-bed, and told them that, instead of a fortune, he

left them a duty to perform; and that if it could not be accomplished

in one generation, it must be handed down from father to son, until

the descendants of the B----s had paid every farthing to the

descendants of the S----s.

While matters stood in this predicament, the creditor part of the

family removed to England, and the debtors remained at Charleston,

struggling with difficulties and embarrassments, which not only

disabled them from paying the paternal debt, but kept them perpetually

in honourable poverty. Of course, the wish to pay in such minds

survived the ability. It would have been to them an enjoyment of a

high order to hunt out their relatives in England, and place in their

hands the owing L.600. This pleasure, which they were destined never

to taste, often formed the subject of conversation around their

fireside; and the children, as they grew up, were initiated into the

mystery of the L.600.

But that generation passed away, and another succeeded to the

liability; not that there existed any liability in law, for though a

deed had been executed, it had lapsed in the course of time, so that

there was really no obligation but that which was the strongest of

all--an uneradicable sense of right. Often and often did the B----s of

Charleston meet and consult together on this famous debt, which every

one wished, but no one could afford, to pay. The sons were married,

and had children whom it was incumbent on them to support; the

daughters had married, too, but their husbands possibly did not

acquire with their wives the chivalrous sense of duty which possessed

the breast of every member, male and female, of the B. family, and

inspired them with a wish to do justice when fortune permitted.

It would be infinitely agreeable to collect and peruse the letters and

records of consultations which passed or took place between the

members of this family on the subject of the L.600. These documents

would form the materials of one of the most delightful romances in the

world--the romance of honour, which never dies in some families, but

is transmitted from generation to generation like a treasure above all

price. When this brief notice is read in Charleston, it may possibly

lead to the collection of these materials, which, with the proper

names of all the persons engaged, should, we think, be laid before the

world as a pleasing record of hereditary nobility of sentiment.

After the lapse of many years, a widow and her three nephews found

themselves in possession of the necessary means for paying the family

debt. Three-quarters of a century had elapsed. The children and the

children's children of the original borrower had passed away; but the

honour of the B. family had been transmitted intact to the fourth

generation, and a search was immediately commenced to discover the

creditors in England. This, however, as may well be supposed, was no

easy task. The members of the S. family had multiplied and separated,

married and intermarried, become poor and wealthy, distinguished and

obscure by turns, changed their topographical as well as their social

position, and disappeared entirely from the spot they had occupied on

their first arrival from America.

But honour is indefatigable, and by degrees a letter reached a person

in Kensington, who happened to possess some knowledge of a lady of the

S. family, married to a solicitor practising with great success and

distinction in London. When the letter came to hand, she at first

doubted whether it might not be a sort of grave hoax, intended to

excite expectation for the pleasure of witnessing its disappointment.

However, the English solicitor, accustomed to the incidents of life,

thought there would at least be no harm in replying to the letter from

Charleston, and discovering in this way the real state of the affair.

Some delay necessarily occurred, especially as the B. family in

America were old world sort of people, accustomed to transact business

slowly and methodically, and with due attention to the minutest

points. But at length a reply came, in which the writer observed, that

if a deed of release were drawn up, signed by all the parties

concerned in England, and transmitted to America, the L.600 should

immediately be forwarded for distribution among the members of the S.

family. Some demur now arose. Some of the persons concerned growing

prudent as the chances of recovering the money appeared to multiply,

thought it would be wrong to send the deed of release before the money

had been received. But the solicitor had not learned, in the practice

of his profession, to form so low an estimate of human nature. He

considered confidence in this case to be synonymous with prudence, and

at anyrate resolved to take upon himself the entire responsibility of

complying with the wishes of the Americans. He accordingly drew up the

necessary document, got it signed by as many as participated in his

views, and sent it across the Atlantic, without the slightest doubt or

hesitation. There had been something in the rough, blunt honesty of Mr

B----'s letter that inspired in the man of law the utmost reliance on

his faith, though during the interval which elapsed between the

transmission of the deed and the reception of an answer from the

States, several of his friends exhibited a disposition to make

themselves merry at the expense of his chivalry. But when we consider

all the particulars of the case, we can hardly fail to perceive that

he ran no risk whatever; for even if the debt had not legally lapsed,

the people who had retained it in their memory through three

generations--who had from father to son practised strict economy in

order to relieve themselves from the burden--who had, with much

difficulty and some expense, sought out the heirs of their creditor in

a distant country, could scarcely be suspected of any inclination to

finish off with a fraud at last.

Still, if there was honour on one side, there was enlarged confidence

on the other; and in the course of a few months, the American mail

brought to London the famous L.600 due since before the War of

Independence. The business now was to divide and distribute it. Of

course, each of the creditors was loud in expressions of admiration of

the honour of the B. family, whose representative, while forwarding

the money, asked with much simplicity to have a few old English

newspapers sent out to him by way of acknowledgment. For his own part,

however, he experienced a strong desire to behold some of the persons

to whom he had thus paid a debt of the last century; and he gave a

warm and pressing invitation to any of them, to come out and stay as

long as they thought proper at his house in Charleston. Had the

invitation been accepted, we cannot doubt that Brother Jonathan would

have acted as hospitably in the character of host as he behaved

honourably in that of debtor. It would have been a pleasure, we might

indeed say a distinction, to live under the same roof with such a man,

whose very name carries us back to the primitive times of the colony,

when Charleston was a city of the British Empire, and English laws,

manners, habits, and feelings regulated the proceedings and relations

of its inhabitants. It is to be hoped, therefore, that the London

solicitor will some day drop in quietly upon his friend in Charleston,

to smoke a cigar, and discuss old times with him. He will in that case

probably fancy himself chatting with a contemporary of Rip Van Winkle.

Doubtless there are thousands of such men in the States, where

frequently everything that is estimable in the English character is

cultivated with assiduity.

How the property was distributed among the S. family in England, we

need not say. Each surviving individual had his or her share. The

solicitor was only connected with them by marriage; but with good old

English ideas of uprightness and integrity, he was fully able to

appreciate the Charleston lawyer's sentiments. He would have done

exactly the same himself under similar circumstances; and therefore,

had the sum been tens of thousands instead of hundreds, it could not

be said to have fallen into bad hands. Whether the transaction above

noticed has led or not to a continued correspondence between the

families, we are unable to say; but we think the creditors in England

would naturally have felt a pleasure in exchanging intelligence from

time to time with their worthy debtors in Charleston. These things,

however, are private, and therefore we do not intend to trench upon

them.

Chambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 445 Volume 18, New Series, July 10, 1852 · 第 12 / 22 题