CHAPTER XXVIII.

ABROAD AGAIN.

OLD FRIENDS IN OLD ENGLAND--ALBERT SMITH AS A SHOWMAN--HIS ASCENT

OF MONT BLANC--POPULARITY OF THE ENTERTAINMENT--THE GARRICK

CLUB--“PHINEAS CUTECRAFT”--THE ELEVEN THOUSAND VIRGINS OF

COLOGNE--UTILIZING INCIDENTS--SUBTERRANEAN TERRORS--A

PANIC--EGYPTIAN DARKNESS IN EGYPTIAN HALL--WILLIAM M.

THACKERAY--HIS TWO VISITS TO AMERICA--FRIENDLY RELATIONS WITH THE

NOVELIST--I LOSE HIS SYMPATHY--HIS WARM REGARD FOR HIS AMERICAN

FRIENDS--OTTO GOLDSCHMIDT AND JENNY LIND GOLDSCHMIDT--TENDER OF

THEIR AID--THE FORGED LIND LETTER--BENEDICT AND BELLETTI--GEORGE

AUGUSTUS SALA--CHARLES KEAN--EDMUND YATES--HORACE MAYHEW--GEORGE

PEABODY--MR. BUCKSTONE--MY EXHIBITIONS IN ENGLAND--S. M.

PETTINGILL--MR. LUMLEY.

On arriving at Liverpool, I found that my old friends, Mr. and Mrs.

Lynn, of the Waterloo Hotel, had changed very little during my ten

years’ absence from England. Even the servants in the hotel were mainly

those whom I left there when I last went away from Liverpool--which

illustrates, in a small way, how much less changeable, and more

“conservative” the English people are than we are. The old head-waiter,

Thomas, was still head-waiter, as he had been for full twenty years. His

hair was more silvered, his gait was slower, his shoulders had rounded,

but he was as ready to receive, as I was to repeat, the first order I

ever gave him, to wit: “Fried soles and shrimp sauce.”

And among my many friends in Liverpool and London, but one death had

occurred, and with only two exceptions they all lived in the same

buildings, and pursued the same vocations as when I left them in 1847.

When I reached London, I found one of these exceptions to be Mr. Albert

Smith, who, when I first knew him, was a dentist, a literary hack, a

contributor to _Punch_, and a writer for the magazines,--and who was now

transformed to a first-class showman in the full tide of success, in my

own old exhibition quarters in Egyptian Hall, Piccadilly.

A year or two before, he had succeeded in reaching the top of Mont

Blanc, and after publishing a most interesting account, which was

re-published and translated into several languages, the whole world

over, he concluded to make further use of his expedition by adapting it

to a popular entertainment. He therefore illustrated his ascent by means

of a finely painted and accurate panorama, and he accompanied the

exhibition with a descriptive lecture full of amusing and interesting

incidents, illustrative of his remarkable experiences in accomplishing

the difficult ascent. He also gave a highly-colored and exciting

narrative of his entire journey from London to Switzerland, and back

again, including his trip up and down the Rhine, and introducing the

many peculiar characters of both sexes, he claimed to have met at

different points during his tour. These he imitated and presented in so

life-like a manner, as to fairly captivate and convulse his audiences.

It was one of the most pleasing and popular entertainments ever

presented in London, and was immensely remunerative to the

projector,--resulting, indeed, in a very handsome fortune. The

entertainments were patronized by the most cultivated classes, for

information was blended with amusement, and in no exhibition then in

London was there so much genuine fun. Two or three times Albert Smith

was commanded to appear before the Queen at Buckingham Palace, and at

Windsor, and as he gave his entertainment with great success on these

occasions, spite of the fact that he could not take his panorama with

him, it can readily be imagined that the frame was quite as good as the

picture, and that the lecture as compared with the panorama, admirable

as both were, was by no means the least part of the “show.”

Calling upon Albert Smith, I found him the same kind, cordial friend as

ever, and he at once put me on the free list at his entertainment, and

insisted upon my dining frequently with him at his favorite club, the

Garrick.

The first time I witnessed his exhibition he gave me a sly wink from the

stage at the moment of his describing a scene in the golden chamber of

St. Ursula’s church in Cologne, where the old sexton was narrating the

story of the ashes and bones of the eleven thousand innocent virgins

who, according to tradition, were sacrificed on a certain occasion. One

of the characters whom he pretended to have met several times on his

trip to Mont Blanc, was a Yankee, whom he named “Phineas Cutecraft.” The

wink came at the time he introduced Phineas in the Cologne Church, and

made him say at the end of the sexton’s story about the Virgins’ bones:

“Old fellow, what will you take for that hull lot of bones? I want them

for my Museum in America!”

When the question had been interpreted to the old German, he exclaimed

in horror, according to Albert Smith:

“Mine Gott! it is impossible! We will never sell the Virgins’ bones!”

“Never mind,” replied Phineas Cutecraft, “I’ll send another lot of bones

to my Museum, swear mine are the real bones of the Virgins of Cologne,

and burst up your show!”

This always excited the heartiest laughter; but Mr. Smith knew very well

that I would at once recognize it as a paraphrase of the scene wherein

he had figured with me in 1844 at the porter’s lodge of Warwick Castle.

In the course of the entertainment, I found he had woven in numerous

anecdotes I had told him at that time, and many incidents of our

excursion were also travestied and made to contribute to the interest of

his description of the ascent of Mont Blanc.

When we went to the Garrick club that day, Albert Smith introduced me to

several of his acquaintances as his “teacher in the show business.” As

we were quietly dining together, he remarked that I must have recognized

several old acquaintances in the anecdotes at his entertainment. Upon my

answering that I did, “indeed,” he remarked, “you are too old a showman

not to know that in order to be popular, we must snap up and localize

all the good things which we come across.” By thus engrafting his

various experiences upon this Mont Blanc entertainment, Albert Smith

succeeded in serving up a salmagundi feast, which was relished alike by

royal and less distinguished palates.

At one of the Egyptian Hall matinees, Albert Smith, espying me in the

audience, sent an usher to me with a note of invitation to dine with him

and a number of friends immediately after the close of the

entertainment. To this invitation he added the request that as soon as

he concluded his lecture I should at once come to him through the small

door under the stage at the end of the orchestra, and by thus getting

ahead of the large crowd of ladies and gentlemen composing the audience

we should save time and reach the club at an hour for an early dinner.

As soon as he uttered the last word of his lecture, I pushed for the

little door, the highly distinguished audience, which on this occasion

was mainly made up of ladies, meanwhile slowly progressing towards the

exits, while the orchestra was “playing them out” with selections of

popular music. Closing the stage door behind me, I instantly found

myself enveloped in that Egyptian darkness which was peculiar, I

suppose, if not appropriate, to that part of Egyptian Hall. I could hear

Smith and his assistants walking on the stage over my head, but I dare

not call out lest some nervous Duchess or Countess should faint under

the apprehension that the hall was on fire, or that some other severe

disaster threatened.

Groping my way blindly and hitting my head several times against sundry

beams, at last, to my joy, I reached the knob of the door which led me

into this hole, but to my dismay it had been locked from the outside! In

feeling about, however, I discovered a couple of bell pulls, both of

which I desperately jerked and heard a faint tinkling in two opposite

directions. Next, I heard the heavy canvas drop-curtain roll down

rapidly till it struck the stage with a thud. Then the music in the

orchestra suddenly ceased, and I could readily understand by the shrieks

of the women and the loud protestations of masculine voices that the gas

had been turned off and the whole house left in darkness. This was

followed by hurried and heavy footsteps on the stage, the imprecations

of stage carpenters and gasmen, jargon of foreign musicians in the

orchestra, and the earnest voice of my friend Smith excitedly

exclaiming: “Who rung those bells? why are we all left in the dark?

Light up here at once; bless my soul! what does all this mean?”

I was amazed, yet amused and half alarmed. What to do, I did not know,

so I sat still on a box which I had stumbled over, as well as upon,

afraid to move or put out my hand lest I might touch some machinery

which would give the signal for thunder and lightning, or an earthquake,

or more likely, a Mont Blanc avalanche. Restored tranquillity overhead

assured me that the gas had been relighted. I knew Smith must be

anxiously awaiting me, for he was not a man to be behind time when so

important a matter as dinner was the motive of the appointment.

Something desperate must be done; so I carefully groped my way to the

stage door again and with a strong effort managed to wrench it open.

Covered with dust and perspiration I followed behind the rear of the

out-going audience and found Smith, to whom I narrated my under-ground

experiences.

Brushes, water and towels soon put me once more in presentable condition

and we went to the Garrick Club where we dined with several gentlemen of

note. Smith could not refrain from relating my mishaps and their

consequences in my search for him under difficulties, and worse yet,

under his stage, and great was the merriment over the idea that an old

manager like myself should so lose his reckoning in a place with which

he might well be supposed to be perfectly familiar.

When the late William M. Thackeray made his first visit to the United

States, I think in 1852, he called on me at the Museum with a letter of

introduction from our mutual friend Albert Smith. He spent an hour with

me, mainly for the purpose of asking my advice in regard to the

management of the course of lectures on “The English Humorists of the

Eighteenth Century,” which he proposed to deliver, as he did afterwards,

with very great success, in the principal cities of the Union. I gave

him the best advice I could as to management, and the cities he ought to

visit, for which he was very grateful and he called on me whenever he

was in New York. I also saw him repeatedly when he came to America the

second time with his admirable lectures on “The Four Georges,” which, it

will be remembered he delivered in the United States in the season of

1855-56, before he read these lectures to audiences in Great Britain. My

relations with this great novelist, I am proud to say, were cordial and

intimate; and now, when I called upon him, in 1857, at his own house he

grasped me heartily by the hand and said:

“Mr. Barnum, I admire you more than ever. I have read the accounts in

the papers of the examinations you underwent in the New York courts, and

the positive pluck you exhibit under your pecuniary embarrassments is

worthy of all praise. You would never have received credit for the

philosophy you manifest, if these financial misfortunes had not

overtaken you.”

I thanked him for his compliment, and he continued:

“But tell me, Barnum, are you really in need of present assistance? for

if you are you must be helped.”

“Not in the least,” I replied, laughing; “I need more money in order to

get out of bankruptcy and I intend to earn it; but so far as daily bread

is concerned, I am quite at ease, for my wife is worth £30,000 or

£40,000.”

“Is it possible?” he exclaimed, with evident delight; “well, now, you

have lost all my sympathy; why, that is more than I ever expect to be

worth; I shall be sorry for you no more.”

During my stay in London, I met Thackeray several times, and on one

occasion I dined with him. He was a most genial, noble-hearted

gentleman. In our conversations he spoke with the warmest appreciation

of America, and of his numerous friends in this country, and he

repeatedly expressed his obligations to me for the advice and assistance

I had given him on the occasion of his first lecturing visit to the

United States.

The late Charles Kean, then manager of the Princess’s Theatre, in

London, was also exceedingly polite and friendly to me. He placed a box

at my disposal at all times, and took me through his theatre to show me

the stage, dressing rooms, and particularly the valuable “properties” he

had collected. Among other things, he had twenty or more complete suits

of real armor and other costumes and appointments essential to the

production of historical plays, in the most complete and authentic

manner. In the mere matter of stage-setting, Charles Kean has never been

surpassed.

Otto Goldschmidt, the husband of Jenny Lind, also called on me in

London. He and his wife were then living in Dresden, and he said the

first thing his wife desired him to ask me was, whether I was in want. I

assured him that I was not, although I was managing to live in an

economical way and my family would soon come over to reside in London.

He then advised me to take them to Dresden, saying that living was very

cheap there; and, he added, “my wife will gladly look up a proper house

for you to live in.” I thankfully declined his proffered kindness, as

Dresden was too far away from my business. A year subsequent to this, a

letter was generally published in the American papers, purporting to

have been written to me by Jenny Lind, and proffering me a large sum of

money. I immediately pronounced the letter a forgery, and I soon

afterwards received a communication from a young reporter in

Philadelphia acknowledging himself as the author, and saying that he

wrote it from a good motive, hoping it would benefit me. On the contrary

it annoyed me exceedingly.

My old friends Julius Benedict and Giovanni Belletti, called on me and

we had some very pleasant dinners together, when we talked over

incidents of their travels in America. Among the gentlemen whom I met in

London, some of them quite frequently at dinners, were Mr. George

Augustus Sala, Mr. Edmund Yates, Mr. Horace Mayhew, Mr. Alfred Bunn, Mr.

Lumley, of Her Majesty’s Theatre, Mr. Buckstone, of the Haymarket, Mr.

Charles Kean, our princely countrymen Mr. George Peabody, Mr. J. M.

Morris, the manager, Mr. Bates, of Baring, Brothers & Co., Mr. Oxenford,

dramatic critic of the London _Times_, Dr. Ballard, the American

dentist, and many other eminent persons.

I had numerous offers from professional friends on both sides of the

Atlantic who supposed me to be in need of employment. Mr. Barney

Williams, who had not then acted in England, proposed in the kindest

manner to make me his agent for a tour through Great Britain, and to

give me one-third of the profits which he and Mrs. Williams might make

by their acting. Mr. S. M. Pettengill, of New York, the newspaper

advertising agent, offered me the fine salary of $10,000 a year to

transact business for him in Great Britain. He wrote to me: “when you

failed in consequence of the Jerome clock notes, I felt that your

creditors were dealing hard with you; that they should have let you up

and give you a chance, and they would have fared better and I wish I was

a creditor so as to show what I would do.” These offers, both from Mr.

Williams and Mr. Pettengill, I was obliged to decline.

Mr. Lumley, manager of Pier Majesty’s Theatre, used to send me an order

for a private box for every opera night, and I frequently availed myself

of his courtesy. I had an idea that much money might be made by

transferring his entire opera company, which then included Piccolomini

and Titjiens to New York for a short season. The plan included the

charter of a special steamer for the company and the conveyance of the

entire troup, including the orchestra, with their instruments, and the

chorus, costumes, scores, and properties of the company. It was a

gigantic scheme, which would no doubt have been pecuniarily successful,

and Mr. Lumley and I went so far as to draw up the preliminaries of an

arrangement, in which I was to share a due proportion of the profits for

my assistance in the management; but after a while, and to the evident

regret of Mr. Lumley, the scheme was given up.

Meanwhile, I was by no means idle. Cordelia Howard as “Little Eva,” with

her mother as the inimitable “Topsy,” were highly successful in London

and other large cities, while General Tom Thumb, returning after so long

an absence, drew crowded houses wherever he went. These were strong

spokes in the wheel that was moving slowly but surely in the effort to

get me out of debt, and, if possible, to save some portion of my real

estate. Of course, it was not generally known that I had any interest

whatever in either of these exhibitions; if it had been, possibly some

of the clock creditors would have annoyed me; but I busied myself in

these and in other ways, working industriously and making much money,

which I constantly remitted to my trusty agent at home.

Struggles and Triumphs: or, Forty Years' Recollections of P. T. Barnum · 第 28 / 43 章