[18] Sections IV and V of the title essay in _The Demon of the
Absolute_ (New Shelburne Essays, Vol. I), 1928; reprinted with the kind
permission of the author and of the Princeton University Press. Section
IV (I, as here reprinted) concerns “The Fetish of Pure Art” and section
V (II) “The Fetish of Pure Science.”
[19] _Nuovi Saggi di Estetica_, 1920.
[20] _La Deshumanización del Arte_, Madrid, 1925.
[21] _Alegrarse o sufrir con los destinos humanos que, tal vez, la obra
de arte nos refiere o presenta, es cosa muy diferente del verdadero
goce artistico. Más aún: esa ocupación con lo humano de la obra es, en
principio, incompatible con la estricta fruición estética._
[22] _Masterpieces of Chikamatsu, the Japanese Shakespeare_, translated
by Asataro Miyamori, p. 48.
[23] _Modern Painting_, by Frank Jewett Mather, Jr., p. 375.
[24] There are passages in Mr. Whitehead’s books in which the word
“God” is used properly, even nobly, with its religious connotation; and
indeed, as Professor A. E. Taylor has shown in the _Dublin Review_ for
July 1927, part of the difficulty in grasping his argument is owing to
this intellectual double-dealing. But in the end the conception of God
as a physical law, or impersonal principle, quite wins out.
_The Pride of Modernity_