DOUGLASS, HARRIET BEECHER STOWE AND JOHN BROWN
The anti-slavery agitation made and revealed some of the most notable
characters in American history. As it grew in extent and intensity, it
attracted to itself men and women gifted with the powers needed to force
great issues to a conclusion. Those who were already in the struggle,
like Mr. Douglass, became more strongly committed to it, and those who
were not yet enlisted, but belonged to it by right of individual
temperament and spiritual inheritance, hurriedly took their places in
the foremost ranks of responsibility and action.
There was no such thing as indifference in this matter. For those who
understood the vast issue there were grave questions involved, and in
some form or other the right or wrong of it knocked at the door of every
one’s mind and conscience.
To those who were sufficiently gifted to say and do anything great
concerning this cause, the opportunity was now at hand. In the midst of
the confusion and controversy, the public was ready to listen to some
clear voice that would tell it the facts in regard to American slavery.
Harriet Beecher Stowe responded to this need and was inspired to recite
the story of the Negro in America. This she did with a mastery and a
fascination that commanded the widest reading ever yet given to an
American book. She so stirred the hearts of the Northern people that a
large part of them were ready either to vote, or, in the last extremity,
to fight for the suppression of slavery. The value of _Uncle Tom’s
Cabin_ to the cause of Abolition can never be justly estimated.
Mrs. Stowe was a member of the great Beecher family, and was by
inheritance, as well as by special inspiration, peculiarly fitted to
perform this service. She developed a concern in the slavery question in
the natural course of her interest in all questions of the time. She
lived for awhile in Cincinnati, where she was brought into close touch
with some of the most cruel incidents of slavery,—the flight and capture
of fugitives. Her sensitive nature was stung by seeing men hunted
through the streets of the city, and carried back into bondage. She was
near the scene when Birney’s anti-slavery press was destroyed by the
mob. The whole atmosphere about her was surcharged with the spirit of
the controversy, and the more she learned of the issue, the deeper
became her interest in it. Stirred by sympathy for those whom she had
come to regard as the victims of a bad system, she determined to know
everything that was possible to be known about it.
Crossing the Ohio River, Mrs. Stowe went down into the land of slavery,
to study the institution at first hand. When she left the South and
returned to New England with her husband, she saw and felt the evil as
few in the North had ever seen and felt it.
She soon discovered that the great mass of the Northern people were not
able to share her views. She found most of them either indifferent or
incredulous, and concluded that if they had had her experiences, they
would also have her convictions. The immediate incentive to the writing
of _Uncle Tom’s Cabin_ was the desire to arouse the national conscience
and bring the people to a sense of their responsibility. This remarkable
story first appeared in an anti-slavery newspaper, and proved so popular
that it was soon issued in book form. The rapidity with which one
edition after another was published and consumed at home and abroad, was
without precedent. The Abolitionists were quick to recognize the story
as the most powerful engine that had yet been employed against slavery.
Frederick Douglass thus speaks of its influence:
“Nothing could have better suited the moral and humane requirements of
the hour. Its effect was amazing, instantaneous, and universal. She
[Mrs. Stowe] at once became the object of interest and admiration the
world over.”
The author was not only concerned for the well-being of those who were
enslaved in the South, but was also intensely interested in those who
were already free in the North. She looked to Mr. Douglass as the most
eminent representative of the Negro race in the free-states, and before
sailing for England, whither she had been invited by the people, who
were anxious to show her some honors for what she had done, asked him to
her home in Andover, Mass. He gladly accepted the invitation, and, in
his _Life and Times_, gives the following account of his visit:
“I was received at her home with genuine cordiality. There was no
contradiction between the author and her book. Mrs. Stowe appeared in
conversation equally well as she appeared in her writing. She made to me
a nice little speech in announcing her object in sending for me: ‘I have
invited you here,’ she said, ‘because I wish to confer with you as to
what can be done for the free colored people of the country. I am going
to England and expect to have a considerable sum of money placed in my
hands, and I intend to use it in some way for the permanent good of the
colored people and especially for that class which has become free by
their own exertions. In what way to do this most successfully is the
subject which I wish to talk with you about. In any event I desire to
have some monument rise after _Uncle Tom’s Cabin_, which shall show that
it produced more than a transient influence.’”
They discussed at some length the condition of his people in the
Northern states, and as a result both concluded that there should be
established an “Industrial College,” where colored people could learn
some of the useful handicrafts,—to work in iron, wood and leather—and
where a good plain English education could also be obtained. Their
poverty kept them ignorant, and ignorance kept them degraded. Mrs. Stowe
became so much interested in Mr. Douglass’s educational purposes that
she asked him to submit his plans in writing, so that she could take
them to England with her and show them to her friends. On his return to
Rochester he elaborated his views, as she had requested. The plans were
then shown to many of the leading Negroes who worked with him, and they
very heartily approved. Later they were submitted to a convention of
representative colored people in Rochester to receive the endorsement of
that body. In this educational scheme, Mr. Douglass has given evidence
of his understanding of the needs of the Negro in our generation, as
well as of those in his own. The following is an extract from the
statement which he sent to Mrs. Stowe in 1853:
“The plan which I humbly submit in answer to this query is the
establishment in Rochester, N. Y., or in some other part of the United
States, equally favorable to such an enterprise, of an Industrial
College in which shall be taught several important branches of the
mechanic arts. This college shall be open to colored youth. I will
pass over the details of such an institution as I propose.... Never
having had a day’s schooling in all my life, I may not be expected to
map out the details of a plan so comprehensive as that involved in the
idea of a college. The argument in favor of an Industrial College, a
college to be conducted by the best men and the best workmen which the
mechanic arts can afford; where the colored youth can be instructed to
use their hands, as well as their heads; where they can be put in
possession of the means of getting a living, whether their lot in
after-life may be cast among civilized or uncivilized men, whether
they choose to stay here, or prefer to return to the land of their
fathers, is briefly this: Prejudice against the free colored people in
the North has nowhere shown itself so invincible as among mechanics.
The farmer and the professional man cherish no feeling so bitter as
that cherished by these. The latter would starve us out of the country
entirely. At this moment I can more easily get my son into a lawyer’s
office to study law than I can into a blacksmith’s shop to blow the
bellows and to wield the sledge-hammer. Denied the means of learning
the useful trades, we are pressed into the narrowest limits to obtain
a livelihood. In times past we have been the hewers of wood and
drawers of water for American society, and we once enjoyed a monopoly
in menial employments, but this is so no longer. Even these
employments are rapidly passing out of our hands. The fact is, that
colored men must learn trades; must find new employments new modes of
usefulness to society; or they must decay under the pressing wants to
which their condition is rapidly bringing them.
“We must become mechanics; we must build as well as live in houses; we
must make as well as use furniture; we must construct bridges as well
as pass over them, before we can properly live or be respected by our
fellow-men. We need mechanics as well as ministers. We need workers in
iron, clay, and leather. We have orators, authors, and other
professional men, but these reach only a certain class, and get
respect for our race in certain select circles. To live here as we
ought, we must fasten ourselves to our countrymen through their
every-day cardinal wants. We must not only be able to black boots, but
to make them. At present, in the Northern states, we are unknown as
mechanics. We give no proof of genius or skill at the county, state,
or national fairs.
“The fact that we make no show of our ability is held conclusive of
_our inability to make any_, hence all the indifference and contempt
with which incapacity is regarded fall upon us, and that too when we
have had no means of disproving the infamous opinion of our natural
inferiority. I have during the last dozen years denied before
Americans that we are an inferior race, but this has been done by
arguments based upon admitted principles rather than by the
presentation of facts. Now, firmly believing as I do, that there are
skill, invention, power, industry, and real mechanical genius among
the colored people, which will bear favorable testimony for them, and
which only need the means to develop them, I am decidedly in favor of
the establishment of such a college as I have mentioned. The benefits
of such an institution will not be confined to the Northern states nor
to the free colored people. They would extend over the whole Union.
The slave, not less than the freeman, would be benefited by such an
institution. It must be confessed that the most powerful argument now
used by the Southern slave-holder, and the one most soothing to his
conscience, is that derived from the low condition of the free colored
people of the North. I have long felt that too little attention has
been given by our truest friends in this country, to removing this
stumbling block out of the way of the slave’s liberation.
“The most telling, the most killing refutation of slavery is the
presentation of an industrious, enterprising, thrifty and intelligent
free black population. Such a population I believe would rise in the
Northern states under the fostering care of such a college as that
proposed.
“Allow me to say in conclusion that I believe every intelligent
colored man in America will approve and rejoice at the establishment
of some such institution as that now suggested. There are many
respectable colored men, fathers of large families, having boys nearly
grown, whose minds are tossed by night and by day with the anxious
query, What shall I do with my boys? Such an institution would meet
the wants of such persons. Then, too, the establishment of such an
institution would be in character with the eminently practical
philanthropy of your trans-Atlantic friends. America could scarcely
object to it as an attempt to agitate the public mind on the subject
of slavery, or to dissolve the Union. It could not be tortured into a
cause for hard words by the American people, but the noble and good of
all classes would see in the effort an excellent motive, a benevolent
object temperately, wisely and practically manifested.”
It would hardly be possible to show in any better way the far-reaching
and prophetic character of the mind of Frederick Douglass. This letter
indicates very plainly that even before General Armstrong had formulated
his plan of academic and industrial education, before Hampton Institute,
and long before Tuskegee Institute was thought of, Frederick Douglass
saw the necessity for just such work as many of the industrial schools
are doing in the South at the present time.
It is thus most pleasant to have the name of Douglass linked with the
cause of industrial education. He believed not only in academic and
college training but also in agricultural and mechanical education.
Hampton, Tuskegee and many other institutions are now putting his
teachings into practice.
While in England, Mrs. Stowe was made the object of much abuse by
certain American newspapers, which accused her of obtaining British gold
for her own use. Douglass, through the _North Star_, defended her
vigorously against these charges, and the malicious were silenced. For
reasons which he could not ascertain, the plans for the industrial
school were never carried out, and, so far as is known, Mrs. Stowe never
again took up the project with him.
The period that discovered to America and the world Harriet Beecher
Stowe, the writer of the Abolition movement, also revealed John Brown,
the man of action. What Mrs. Stowe felt and wrote, John Brown attempted
to carry into effect.
Mr. Douglass’s relations with this man were more intimate and continuous
than his associations with the author of _Uncle Tom’s Cabin_. No one
could be a part of the anti-slavery movement between 1849 and 1859
without knowing and being more or less influenced by the personality of
John Brown. His opposition to slavery was like that of no other person.
It was scarcely a compliment to him to say that he was highly regarded
by the Abolitionists; their feeling toward him had in it more of awe
than admiration. At all times he would rather fight than discuss
slavery. He began to dislike it when he was twelve years of age. His
business, his family, his patriotism were all subordinated to the one
dominant purpose of hurling himself, and everybody else who would follow
him, against the system. He would judge and estimate all persons by what
they thought and felt about slavery. John Brown early formed an
attachment for Douglass, being, in the beginning of his career, better
known by the Negroes than by the white people. He mingled with them
continually, hearing over and over again the stories, sometimes
thrilling, sometimes pathetic, of a dawning desire for freedom, and soon
learned to know almost everything about their condition. He became one
of the most active conductors of the Underground Railway system.
Douglass says that when the slaves mentioned the name of John Brown,
they dropped their voices to a whisper, as if it were a sort of
profanity to speak of him as they would of any one else.
In 1847, Douglass received an urgent invitation from Brown to visit him
at his home in Springfield, Mass. He responded to the call as if to a
command, and he has given the following account of that visit:—
“At the time to which I now refer, this man was a respectable merchant
in a populous and thriving city, and our first place of meeting was at
his store. A glance at the interior, as well as at the massive walls
without, gave me the impression that the owner must be a man of
considerable wealth. My welcome was all that I could have asked. Every
member of the family, young and old, seemed glad to see me, and I was
made at home in a very little while. I was, however, a little
disappointed with the appearance of the house and its location. After
seeing the fine store I was prepared to see a fine residence in an
eligible locality, but this conclusion was completely dispelled by
actual observation. It was a small wooden building on a back street,
in a neighborhood chiefly occupied by laboring men and mechanics,
respectable enough, to be sure, but not quite the place, I thought,
one would look for the residence of a flourishing and successful
merchant. Plain as was the outside of this man’s house, the inside was
plainer. There was an air of plainness about it which almost suggested
destitution. My first meal passed under the misnomer of tea, though
there was nothing about it resembling the usual significance of that
term. It consisted of beef-soup, cabbage and potatoes—a meal such as a
man might relish after following the plough all day or performing a
forced march, of a dozen miles, over a rough road in frosty weather.
Innocent of paint, veneering, varnish, or table-cloth, the table
announced itself unmistakably of pine and of the plainest workmanship.
There was no hired help visible. The mother, daughters and sons did
the serving, and did it well. They were evidently used to it, and had
no thought of any impropriety or degradation in being their own
servants. Everything implied stern truth, solid purpose, and rigid
economy. I was not long in company with the master of this house
before I discovered that he was indeed the master of it, and was
likely to become mine too, if I stayed long enough with him. He
fulfilled St. Paul’s idea of the head of the family. His wife believed
in him, and his children obeyed him with reverence. Whenever he spoke,
his words commanded earnest attention. His arguments, which I ventured
at some points to oppose, seemed to convince all; his appeals touched
all, and his will impressed all. Certainly I never felt myself in the
presence of a stronger religious influence than while in this man’s
house.
“In person he was lean, strong, and sinewy, of the best New England
mold, built for times of trouble, and fitted to grapple with the
flintiest hardships. Clad in plain American woolen, shod in boots of
cowhide leather, and wearing a cravat of the same substantial
material, under six feet high, less than 150 pounds in weight, aged
about fifty years, he presented a figure straight and symmetrical as a
mountain pine. His bearing was singularly impressive. His head was not
large but compact and high. His hair was coarse, his strong spare
mouth, supported by a broad and prominent chin. His eyes were bluish
gray, and in conversation they were full of light and fire. When on
the street, he moved with a long springing race-horse step, absorbed
by his own reflections, neither seeking nor shunning observation. Such
was the man whose name I heard in whispers; such was the spirit of his
house and family; such was the house in which he lived; and such was
Captain John Brown, whose name has now passed into history, as that of
one of the most marked characters and greatest heroes known to
American fame.
“After the strong meal described, Brown cautiously approached the
subject which he wished to bring to my attention; for he seemed to
apprehend opposition to his views. He denounced slavery in look and
language fierce and bitter; he thought that slave-holders had
forfeited their right to live, that the slaves had a right to gain
their liberty in any way they could; did not believe that moral
suasion would ever liberate a slave, or that political action would
abolish the system. He said that he had long had a plan which could
accomplish this end, and he had invited me to his house to lay that
plan before me. He said that he had been for some time looking for
colored men to whom he could safely reveal his secret, and at times he
had almost despaired of finding such men; but that now he was
encouraged, because he saw heads of such rising in all directions. He
had observed my course at home and abroad, and he wanted my
coöperation. His plan, as it then lay in his mind, had much to commend
it. It did not, as some suppose, contemplate a general rising among
the slaves, and a general slaughter of the slave-masters. An
insurrection, he thought, would only defeat the object; but his plan
did contemplate the creating of an armed force which should act in the
very heart of the South. He was not averse to the shedding of blood,
and thought the carrying of firearms would be a good rule for the
colored people to adopt, as it would give them a sense of their
manhood. No people, he said, could have self-respect, or be respected,
who would not fight for their freedom. He called my attention to the
map of the United States. ‘These mountains,’ he said, ‘are the basis
of my plan. God has given the strength of the hills to freedom; they
were placed here for the emancipation of the Negro race; they are full
of natural forts, where one man for defense will be equal to a hundred
for attack; they are full also of good hiding places, where large
numbers of brave men could be concealed, and baffle and elude pursuit
for a long time. I know these mountains well, and could take a body of
men into them and keep them there, in spite of all the efforts of
Virginia to dislodge them. The true object to be sought is first of
all to destroy the money value of slave-property; and that can only be
done by rendering such property insecure. My plan, then, is to take,
at first, about twenty-five picked men, and begin on a small scale;
supply them with arms and ammunition and post them in squads of fives
on a line of twenty-five miles. The most persuasive and judicious of
these shall go down to the fields from time to time, as opportunity
offers, and induce the slaves to join them, seeking and selecting the
most reckless and daring.’”
From this time on the relationship between these two Abolitionists grew
in intimacy and thereafter Mr. Douglass’s Rochester home was John
Brown’s headquarters whenever he was in that part of the country.
In the Springfield conference, he related his daring plans for the
rescue of the slaves in Virginia. Mr. Douglass readily saw how
impracticable and certain of disastrous failure this project must be,
but John Brown could never be made to understand the peril of anything
that he thought it was right to do. The possibility of failure seemed
never to enter into his calculations. Mr. Douglass said to him at
Springfield:
“Suppose you succeed in running off a few slaves, and thus impress the
Virginia slave-holders with a sense of insecurity in their slaves, the
effect will be only to make them sell their slaves further South.”
Whereupon Captain Brown replied: “That will be just what I want first to
do; then I would follow them up. If we could drive them out of one
county it would be a great gain; it would weaken the system throughout
the state.”
“But,” said Douglass, “they would employ blood-hounds to hunt you out of
the mountains.”
“That they might attempt,” was the answer, “but the chances are that we
should whip them, and when we should have whipped one squad, they would
be careful how they pursued us.”
Thus would Brown confidently meet all possible obstacles to his plan of
invasion. If any other man had urged such views about freeing the slaves
with a force of less than one hundred men in the Virginia mountains, he
would have been regarded as ridiculous; but John Brown was an advocate
of such intensity of faith and readiness to put himself in front of
every danger, that it required no little courage to oppose him.
Mr. Douglass was evidently much affected by this interview. He had never
before seen courage and self-confidence so imperious, or a determination
to do something large and terrible so absolutely regardless of
consequences. After this conference he admits that his own “utterances
became more and more tinged by the color of this man’s strong
impressions,” and his conviction grew “that slavery could only end in
blood.”
Brown’s influence was easily traceable in Mr. Douglass’s subsequent
utterances, both in the _North Star_ and in his public addresses. During
the fight for free soil and free men in Kansas, after the
Kansas-Nebraska bill became a law, Mr. Douglass probably did more than
any one to supply the militant captain with money and munitions. The
full size of Brown as a man was revealed in Kansas when the struggle
between pro-slavery and anti-slavery forces became actual war. His
daring deeds in going into the state of Missouri, bringing out dozens of
slaves and conducting them safely to the North; and his fight to keep
Kansas free, could not have succeeded, but for the support of such men
as Frederick Douglass. Captain Brown’s experiences and adventures here
strengthened his conviction that his plans for the invasion of Virginia
were right. He had studied the mountain ranges and was satisfied in his
own mind that the “Almighty had raised those mountains for the very
purpose of aiding him to strike a death blow to slavery.” The
correspondence between the two men continued and the black leader was
well informed of every movement. Brown never ceased to urge the ex-slave
to join him, both in drawing up a constitution for future use and in the
actual fighting. Indeed he had so exalted an opinion of Douglass’s
influence that it was believed the slaves in Virginia and other parts of
the South would rise _en masse_ if they knew that he was a part of this
rescuing army.
About three weeks before the assault at Harper’s Ferry, while John Brown
was at Chambersburg, making final arrangements for his attack, he sent
an urgent letter to Douglass, begging a conference. The latter knew that
this was a perilous step and would certainly implicate him in the
conspiracy when the crash of failure came; yet he ignored the danger and
responded. He speaks of this last visit to the old warrior, in part, as
follows:
“I approached the old quarry with a good deal of caution, for John Brown
was generally armed and regarded strangers with suspicion. He was there
under ban of the government and heavy rewards were offered for his
arrest for several offenses which he is said to have committed in
Kansas. He was then passing under the name of John Smith. As I came near
him, he regarded me rather suspiciously, but soon recognized me and
received me cordially. He had in his hand, when I met him, fishing
tackle, with which he had been fishing in a stream hard by, but I saw no
fish.... The fishing was simply a disguise and was certainly a good one.
He looked in every way like a man of the neighborhood and as much at
home as any of the farmers around there. His hat was old and
storm-beaten and his clothing was about the color of the quarry itself,
his present dwelling-place. His face wore an anxious expression and he
was much worn by exposure. I felt that I was on a dangerous mission and
was as little desirous of discovery as himself.”
Captains Brown, Kage, Shields Green and Mr. Douglass sat down to hold a
council of war. The whole scheme of the proposed attack on Harper’s
Ferry and its capture was gone over without the slightest hint of
possible failure. Douglass opposed the plan as wholly impracticable and
fatal to all who might engage in it, but his arguments were promptly set
aside by Brown. “He was not to be shaken by anything I could say, but
treated my views respectfully. The debate continued during Saturday and
Sunday. Brown was for striking a blow that would arouse the country, and
I, for the policy of gradually and secretly drawing off the slaves to
the mountains, as at first suggested by Brown himself.” In the most
fervent manner he urged Mr. Douglass to remain and take part in the
fight. Just before the latter’s departure, Brown threw his arm around
the black man’s neck and said: “Come with me, Douglass! I will defend
you with my life. I want you for a special purpose. When I strike, the
bees will begin to swarm, and I shall want you to help hive them.”
The colored leader did not yield to the entreaty. Brown was incapable of
seeing the death-trap that he had set for himself and his followers, and
even if he could have seen it, he would not have been moved from his
determination. A thousand men might have followed him and all have
perished, but there could have been but one martyr, and that was
himself. Mr. Douglass’s death would have been a wanton sacrifice,
because it would have meant nothing to the cause for which he had
contributed so much of his life during the previous twenty-five years.
He had a right to feel, as his subsequent career so abundantly proved,
that his work was not finished. Of all the Abolitionists he was the only
one who followed Brown to the last with advice, money, and other
assistance. Because of what he had already done, and especially in this
final conference at Chambersburg, he became amenable, as afterward
appeared, to the charge of treason.
When the news was flashed over the land that John Brown was captured,
the whole country was thrown into a state of great excitement. In
Virginia the conclusion was quickly reached that the raid was backed by
a wide-spread conspiracy and that men high in rank were implicated. Mr.
Douglass at the time was addressing a large audience in Philadelphia. If
he had any fear for himself, he did not show it. By lingering in the
state so near the borders of slavery, where he had just been in
conference with the head and front of the movement, he was in imminent
danger. Brown’s satchel, now in the hands of the officials, contained
much of Douglass’s correspondence. His friends were apprehensive and
insisted upon his immediate flight from Philadelphia to his home in
Rochester, and thence to Canada. As a matter of precaution, the
following telegram was sent by his friend, Miss Assing, to Rochester:
“B. F. Blackall, Esq.: Tell Lewis [Douglass’s eldest son] to secure all
the important papers in my desk.”
All the newspapers stated that the Federal Government would spare no
pains to run down and arrest every one who was in any way connected with
the conspiracy. It would have been gratifying to those in power to have
laid hands on Frederick Douglass and to have made an example of him,
because he was regarded as one of the most offensive of those who fought
slavery. That his friends were not unduly anxious for his safety is also
proven by the following copy of a letter signed by the Governor of
Virginia and sent to the President:
“(Confidential.)
“RICHMOND, VA., NOV. 13, 1859.
“_To His Excellency, James Buchanan, President of the United States,
and to the Honorable Postmaster-General of the United States_:
“GENTLEMEN:—I have information such as has caused me, upon proper
affidavits, to make requisition upon the Executive of Michigan for the
delivery up of the person of Frederick Douglass, a Negro man, supposed
now to be in Michigan, charged with murder, robbery, and inciting
servile insurrection in the State of Virginia. My agents for the arrest
and reclamation of the person so charged, are Benjamin M. Morris and
William N. Kelly. The latter has the requisition and will wait on you to
the end of obtaining nominal authority as post-office agents. They need
to be very secretive in this matter, and some pretext for traveling
through this dangerous section for the execution of the laws in this
behalf, and some protection against obtrusive, unruly, or lawless
violence. If it be proper to do so, will the Postmaster-General be
pleased to give to Mr. Kelly, for each of these men, a permit and
authority to act as detectives for the Post-office Department, without
pay, but to pass and repass without question, delay, or hindrance?
“Respectfully submitted,
“By your obedient servant,
“HENRY A. WISE.”
Mr. Douglass was fairly pushed into Canada by his friends, but the
determination to get hold of him was so strong that he was not regarded
as safe even there. It would not have been impossible to effect some
plan for arresting him so long as he remained so close to his native
land. It was decided therefore that he must again go to England. He had
already planned this trip, but the interesting events that culminated in
the Harper’s Ferry tragedy had delayed his departure.
Mr. Douglass stated publicly that he would be perfectly willing to be
tried anywhere in New York State, but not elsewhere. He took passage for
England from Quebec on the 12th day of November, 1859, and was
everywhere received with the old-time cordiality. As he was fresh from
the scenes and events that had stirred the English almost as much as the
American people, he was in great demand for more complete information.
He had occasion to deliver many addresses and it was everywhere manifest
that he had lost none of his former prestige. The only setback he
suffered was when he applied to George M. Dallas, the American Minister
to the Court of St. James, for a passport for the purpose of visiting
Paris. He was refused on the ground that he was not a citizen of the
United States. His visit was cut short by the distressing news of the
death of his beloved little daughter, Anna, the delight and life of his
home, his absence having covered only five months. He returned to find
the public temper toward him mollified by the swift happenings of a
season which was marked by incessant change in the currents of popular
feeling.