ROMEO AND JULIET.

Italy! land of love and maccaroni, of pathos and puppets--tomb of Romeo and

Juliet--birth-place of Punch and Judy--region of romance--country of the

concentrated essences of all these;--carnivals--I, PUNCH, the first and

last, the alpha and omega of fun, adore thee! From the moment when I was

cast upon thy shores, like Venus, out of the sea, to this sad day, when I

am forced to descend from my own stage to mere criticism; have I preserved

every token that would endear my memory to thee! My nose is still Roman, my

mouth-organ plays the "genteelest of" Italian "tunes"--my scenes represent

the choicest of Italian villas--in "choice Italian" doth my devil swear--to

wit, "_shal-la-bella!_"

Longing to be still more reminded of thee, dear Italy, I threw a large

cloak over my hunch, and a huge pair of spectacles over my nose, and

ensconced myself in a box at the Haymarket Theatre, to witness the fourth

appearance of my rival puppet, Charles Kean, in Romeo. He is an actor! What

a deep voice--what an interesting lisp--what a charming whine--what a

vigorous stamp, he hath! How hard he strikes his forehead when he is going

into a rage--how flat he falls upon the ground when he is going to die! And

then, when he has killed Tybalt, what an attitude he strikes, what an

appalling grin he indulges his gaping admirers withal!

This is real acting that one pays one's money to see, and not such an

unblushing imposition as Miss Tree practises upon us. Do we go to the play

to see nature? of course not: we only desire to see the actors playing at

being natural, like Mr. Gallot, Mr. Howe, Mr. Worral, or Mr. Kean, and

other actors. This system of being too natural will, in the end, be the

ruin of the drama. It has already driven me from the Stage, and will, I

fear, serve the great performers I nave named above in the same manner. But

the Haymarket Juliet overdoes it; she is more natural than nature, for she

makes one or two improbabilities in the plot of the play seem like

every-day matters of fact. Whether she falls madly in love at the first

glance, agrees to be married the next afternoon, takes a sleeping draught,

throws herself lifeless upon the bed, or wakes in the tomb to behold her

poisoned lover, still in all these situations she behaves like a sensible,

high-minded girl, that takes such circumstances, and makes them appear to

the audience--quite as a matter of course! What let me ask, was the use of

the author--whose name, I believe, was Shakspere--purposely contriving

these improbabilities, if the actors do not make the most of them? I do

hope Miss Tree will no longer impose upon the public by pretending to _act_

Juliet. Let her try some of the characters in Bulwer's plays, which want

all her help to make them resemble women of any nation, kindred, or

country.

Much as I admire Kean, I always prefer the acting of Wallack; there is more

variety in the tones of his voice, for Kean tunes his pipes exactly as my

long-drummer sets his drum;--to one pitch: but as to action, Wallack--more

like my drummer--beats him hollow; he points his toes, stands a-kimbo,

takes off his hat, and puts it on again, quite as naturally as if he

belonged to the really legitimate drama, and was worked by strings cleverly

pulled to suit the action to _every_ word. Wallack is an honest performer;

_he_ don't impose upon you, like Webster, for instance, who as the

Apothecary, speaks with a hungry voice, walks with a tottering step, moves

with a helpless gait, which plainly shows that he never studied the

part--he must have starved for it. Where will this confounded naturalness

end?

The play is "got up," as we managers call it, capitally. The dresses are

superb, and so are the properties. The scenery exhibited views of different

parts of the city, and was, so far as I am a judge, well painted. I have

only one objection to the balcony scene. Plagiarism is mean and

contemptible--I despise it. I will not apply to the Vice-Chancellor for an

injunction, because the imitation is so vilely caricatured; but the balcony

itself is the very counterpart of PUNCH'S theatre!--PUNCH.

* * * * *

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 1, July 24, 1841 · 第 59 / 69 题