Here at this Co{r}te witnesses being hard betwene Willm̃ Carrington

and Allen Collye they were made frendes, shoke handes and frendly

depˀted.

2nd March, 1573. Here was a complaint agaynste Henrye Lushe by John

Parradize for that the said Henry Lushe called the said John Paradize

knave, and he p{d} his fyne xij{d} and they toke hands & were ffrends.

19th April, 1574. Here was Willm̃ Brode and brought in an answere

agaynste the complaynt of Edward Saunders for lykeninge hym to

Esoppes dogge and they were appoynted to be ffrends and to brynge the

matter no more in question.

Was this the “dog in the manger”? Anyhow, it seems a trivial matter to

have been brought before the grave old Masters.

2nd February, 1575. Here came one Willm̃ Goodnep and complayned of

Willm̃ Clowes for not curing his wief de morbo gallico and yt was

awarded that the saide Clowes sholde either geve the saide Goodnep

xx{s} orells cure his saide wief, w{ch} Clowes agreed to pay the

xx{s} and so they were agreed and eche of them made acquittance to

other.

28th February, 1576. Here was a complainte against Willm̃ Clowes

by one Goodenge for that the saide Clowes had not onlie misused

the saide Goodinge in speeche but also most of the masters of the

Companye w{th} scoffing wordes and jestes and they all forgave him

here openlye in the Co{r}te and so the stryfe was ended upon condˀ

that he shold nev{r} so misuse him self a gayne, and bonds was caused

to be made to that effect.

25th September, 1576. At this Coˀte came Willm̃ Wise and Mathew Ken,

and divers evell and unbrotherlike speches was pˀved and so the saide

Willm̃ Wise confest his falt paide his ffyne and made a breakfast to

the Companie for their paynes, and so they shoke hands and were made

ffrends.

25th March, 1577. Here at this Corte was a greate contension and

stryffe spoken of and ended betwene George Baker[278] and Willm̃

Clowes[279] for that they bothe contrary to order and the good and

holsome rules of this howse misused eche other and fought in the

ffelds togethers, but the M{r} Wardens and assistance wishing that

they might be and continewe loving brothers pˀdoned this greate

offence in hope of amendment.

[278] Master 1597 and Serjeant Surgeon.

[279] Warden 1594.

9th January, 1598. Thomas Cole complayned of Thomas Goodall for

sueinge him at the Comon lawe w{th}out license of the M{rs} And was

fined And his fine mittigated to 3{s} 4{d}

4th December, 1599. This daie Roberte Morrey complayned of William

ffoster for callinge him Pandor and Bawde and for sayeinge he was

presented by the Wardemot inqueste for keepinge a bawdye house, uppon

hearinge whereof their controversies were referred to the Maisters of

this Companye, the same to be ended before the sixte daie of Januarye

nexte.

24th July, 1600. In the matter in Controversie betwixt Roger Semper

and ffrancis Thompson it is ordered that the sayd Sempˀ shall at the

next Court bringe in his fine for usinge reprochefull wordes against

the sayd Thompson And for that the sayd Sempers wyefe did assalt the

sayd Thompson & brake his shop wyndowes. And that the sayd Semper

shall delivˀ such goodes as hee hath of the sayd Thompson before

the next Court And that hee shall at the same Court geve the sayd

Thompson satisfacc͠on for his wyndowes.

24th July, 1600. In the Controversie betwixt John Izard & Robert

Steward it is ordered that the sayd Robert Steward shalbe comitted to

the Compter for refusinge to paye his fine for supplantinge the sayd

John Izards cure and for behavinge himselfe unreverendly before the

M{rs} in the Court.

11th September, 1600. This daie John Urvey complayned of Henry Bracye

for arrestinge him before he had obtayned leave of the Maisters And

it was thereuppon ordered that the said Henrye Bracye shoulde be

warned to appeare before the Maisters at the nexte Courte and that he

shoulde be commaunded from the Maisters to staie his suite till then.

17th September, 1600. This daie in the matter in controversi betwixte

Henry Bracy and John Urvey It is ordered that the saide Henry Bracye

shall not proceede any further in his suite but that the said John

Urvey shall paie the debte of ffowerteene shillinges and twoe

shillinges for his chardges by twoe shillinges wickelye till all be

fully satisfied and paide And uppon the payment thereof the said

Bracye to make him a generall acquittaunce the firste payment to

begine on Tewsdaie nexte, And the money to be paide to the M{rs} of

this Companye.

20th October, 1600. This daye it is ordered that John Urvey shalbe

comitted to the Compter for not pˀforminge his payments to Henry

Bracy accordinge to the orders of this howse.

21st July, 1601. Where div{s} controversies hath bene betweene John

Browne and Jenkin Marcrafte the endinge of w{ch} is by them of their

mutuall assents referred to the M{rs} or Governors of this Company

who aft{r} hereinge of their sevˀall controversies & fyndeinge

thereby that the wounde for w{ch} the money was to be paid to John

Browne was reverted to his former state It is thought fit that the

said Marcrafte shall paye to the said Browne pñˀtly[280] the somme of

xl{s} in full satisfacc͠on of all debts duties and demaunds, w{ch}

the said Browne accepted of and received the said somme accordingly.

And whereas Lewis Atm{r} finished the Cure after it was reverted

Therefore it was lykewise ordered that the said Marcrafte shall paye

to him xx{s} for his paynes.

[280] Presently, _i.e._, at once.

6th August, 1601. This daye John Ibatson and John Wyndet referred

a controversie betwene them concerninge a debt of iiij{li} lent by

the said Wyndet to the said Ibatson to the hereinge & endinge of the

M{rs} of this Company and gave the eyth{r} to the oth{r} 6{d} to

stande to their award so that they ended the same before the laste

daye of Septemb{r} next w{ch} if they refuse to stand to, the refuser

shall forfeyt x{li.}

27th March, 1604. This daye Lycence is geven to Andrew Mathewe to sue

Richard Tyler at the Com̃on Lawe for the tenemˀt wherein the said

Tyler nowe dwelleth, for that Tyler refuseth to referre the heareinge

& endinge of that controversie to the M{rs} of this Company.

16th October, 1610. In the Controvˀsie between William Wright and one

Harrington Itt is att this Court ordered that Harrington shall paie

unto Wryght for and in respect of such rentes he doth owe unto Wright

the some of xxx{s} imediate And like wise he shall mend such paynes

of glasse as nowe by his necligence are broken in Wrightꝭ wyndowes

and soe all controvˀsies between them are determyned.

24th September, 1611. In the Controvˀsey between ffrauncꝭ Bilford of

thˀone pˀte & John fflint on thˀother pˀte It is ordered that either

of them shalbe bound unto thˀother of them in 20{li} a peece to stand

to the Award of M{r} John Gerard & M{r} Richard Mapes.

1st October, 1611. At this Court forasmuch as John fflynt would not

stand to the order of the M{rs} set down the last Court between him

& ffrauncꝭ Bilford the said Bilford hath leave to arrest the said

fflynt.

22nd October, 1611. In the Controvˀsie between Dennis Davys on thˀone

pˀte & John Person on thˀother pˀte It is ordered that they shall

live quietlie togethers as brothers of one Company should doe and

neither of them by him selfe or his servantꝭ to gyve or move offence

either by word or deed unto thˀother of them.

It was not often that the good offices of the Court were unavailing in

the settlement of disputes, but in the following case, in which the

lady probably played a prominent part, the Masters seem to have been

unable to settle the matter:--

12th July, 1614. In the complaint made by William Purkꝭ and ffrauncis

his wife against Greene, w{ch} beinge heard at this Court, the M{rs}

could drawe them to noe quiet ende, all pˀties being verye obstinate.

[Illustration]

[Illustration]

HERALDRY.

There are numerous excellent examples of the Company’s Arms at the

Hall. The records contain many beautiful drawings and emblazoned

shields of arms, not only of the Company but of some of the Masters as

well.

One of the choicest specimens is the massive old carving beneath the

semicircular canopy of the entrance doorway; this is dated 1671, and

is both bold and quaint; long may it be preserved to the Barbers!

The carved coat of arms which formerly ornamented the stern of the

Company’s barge, and which is probably late 17th century work, has

been carefully preserved, and may be always admired over the chimney

piece in the Committee room. There is the large “tortershell” in the

vestibule given by Mr. William Kings in 1645. The cloth on the Court

table is artistically embroidered with the Arms of the Company and

the City, the embroidered portions being part of the ancient barge

cloth. There is a handsomely emblazoned coat of arms on the plan of

the Company’s property (presented by Mr. Charles John Shoppee), and

a pretty little bit of old stained glass in the window on the first

floor landing. The Company formerly possessed a great many banners, but

these are unfortunately lost to us; the one which is placed behind the

Master’s chair is beautifully painted by Bishop of Doctors’ Commons,

and has at the back the inscription--

EX DONO SIDNEY YOUNG MISTERII BARBITONSORUM FRATRIS AMANDI 1885.

1451. In this year the original grant of arms was conferred, being

simply the first quarter of our present achievement; sable, a chevron

between three fleams argent, the fleams being mediæval lancets, though

from their shape they have sometimes been thought to represent razors.

This coat was borne by both the Barbers and their successors, the

Barber-Surgeons, until the time of Elizabeth. The grant is as follows:--

[Illustration: Coat of arms]

~Be~ it knowen to all men that y Clarensew Kyng of Armes of the

South Marche of Englond Consideryng the noble estate of the Cite of

London by the name of Erle & Barons as in their ffirst Charter by

scripture appereth and as now called mayre and aldermen and by good

avyce of all the aldermen and the noble citezenis of London that

every alderman shuld have award by hymself to governe and rule to

the Worship of the cite and the maires power evˀy alderman in his

Ward with correccion of the mair beyng for the tyme and so notablie

ordeyned to be custumed evˀy Craft clothing be hem self to know o

Craft from a nother and also synes of Armes in baner wyse to beer

conveniently for the worship of the reame and the noble cite and so

now late the Maisters of Barbory and Surgery within the craft of

Barbours John Strugge Thomas Wyllote Hugh Herte & Thomas Waleys come

& praying me Clarensewe Kyng of Armes to devise hem a conysauns &

syne in fourme of armes under my seall of myn Armes that might be

conveniently to ther Craft. And where y Clarensewe Kyng of Armes

consideryng the gode disposicion of them y have devysed a Conysaunce

in fourme of Armes that is to sey A felde sabull a cheveron bytwene

iij flemys of silver the which syne of armes y Clarensew gyve the

same conysaunce of Armes to the forsaid Crafte and none other Crafte

in no wyse shall not bere the same. ~To~ the which witenesse of this

wrytyng y sette my seal of myn armes & my syne manuall wreten atte

London the xxix day of the monthe of September the xxx{th} yere of

the regne of oure soverayne lord Kyng Henry the Sixt.

By CLARANSEW Kynge of armes.

1492. In this year a cognizance, or possibly an informal grant of arms,

was given to the Surgeons’ Company; this is depicted on the first

leaf in the beautiful old vellum book of Ordinances at the Hall, the

inscription under, stating that it was given to the Craft of Surgeons

of London in the year 1492, at the going over the sea into France of

Henry VII. (_See_ the fac-simile at p. 69.)

No other authority than the above statement is known for this coat, but

in the grant to the Barber-Surgeons (1569) it is recited that Henry

VIII granted the Company of Surgeons a cognizance “which is a spatter

thereon a rose gules crowned golde for their warrant in fielde but

no authoritie by warrant for the bearinge of the same in shilde as

armes.” The Herald in drawing the grant of 1569 probably accidentally

put in the name of Henry VIII for that of Henry VII, the entry in our

book being undoubtedly coeval with the circumstance. We here get the

foundations of our present coat of arms; the fleams representing the

old Barber-Surgeons or Barbers, and the crowned rose and spatula the

Surgeons proper, both of which were introduced into one shield in 1561,

and quartered in 1569.

On either side of the shield of the Surgeons’ Arms stands a Saint

habited as a doctor or physician, one of whom holds a medical vessel in

his right hand, while the other has a box of ointment and a spatula,

indicative of their being professors of the healing art. These are the

patron Saints of the Company, Cosmus and Damianus. Mrs. Jameson states

that they--

were two brothers, Arabians by birth but they dwelt in Ægæ, a city of

Cilicia. Their father having died while they were yet children, their

pious mother Theodora, brought them up with all diligence, and in the

practice of every Christian virtue. Their charity was so great, that

not only they lived in the greatest abstinence, distributing their

goods to the infirm and poor, but they studied medicine and surgery,

that they might be able to prescribe for the sick, and relieve the

sufferings of the wounded and infirm; and the blessing of God being

on all their endeavours, they became the most learned and the most

perfect physicians that the world had ever seen. They ministered to

all who applied to them, whether rich or poor. Even to suffering

animals they did not deny their aid, and they constantly refused all

payment or recompense, exercising their art only for charity and for

the love of God; and thus they spent their days.

In the cover of a Latin Bible, printed in 1470, I discovered some

vellum padding, which on examination proved to be a MS. of XIth

century, consisting of part of a collection of the lives of the

Saints, interspersed with prayers, etc., and which probably had been

read in some Convent refectory during the hours of meals. This MS. is

moreover curious, as those portions intended to be sung have certain

signs affixed, known as “neumes,” which, before the more modern method

of musical notation was introduced, were employed to denote musical

expression. An account of the martyrdom of Cosmo and Damian, together

with their brothers, is here preserved, but as the original is in very

contracted Latin, the following translation will, perhaps, better

supply its place:--

The souls of Cosmus and Damianus the Just are in the hands of God.

There have moreover been crowned these five brothers Cosmus,

Damianus, Antimeus, Leuntius and Eutrepius.

Furthermore we beseech Thee, Almighty God, to grant that we, who

commemorate the nativities of thy Saints Cosmus and Damianus, may by

their intercessions be delivered from all present and future evils.

Amen. The blessed martyrs Cosmus Damianus, Antimeus, Leuntius and

Eutrepius, were committed to prison by order of the governor; and

on the following day, the proconsul sitting on the judgment seat,

caused an enormous fire to be made, and the above-named men to be

led out of prison and cast into its midst. But on account of their

prayers the fire lost its power over these saints. The governor was

astounded, and the executioner, thinking that the circumstances which

had happened with regard to the martyrs of God depended on their

magical arts, ordered them to be again interrogated. But, when they

remained firm with a cheerful and joyous countenance rendered more

noble by torture, he ordered crosses to be made, and the martyrs,

when stretched upon them, to be pelted with stones. Accordingly,

when the blows recoiled on those that delivered them, the governor,

inflamed with excessive rage, gave orders to attack them with arrows,

so that at a less distance the steel might at least penetrate. But,

although he had not been able to injure them in any way, many of

those who discharged arrows and who stood near withdrew on account of

the wounds that they received.

For so is the testimony.

Seeing accordingly that his ill will was overcome by Divine power,

the governor ordered them to be mutilated with a sword.

The blessed martyrs were put to death on the Twentieth day of

September; and their bodies were buried by devout men in a holy spot

not far from the city of Ægae.

Mrs. Jameson relates a legend somewhat similar to the above, and states

that it was of great antiquity, being transplanted into Western Europe

in the first ages of Christianity. The Emperor Justinian, having been

recovered, as he supposed, from a dangerous illness by the intercession

of these saints, erected a superb church in their honour. Among the

Greeks they succeeded to the worship and attributes of Æsculapius;

and from their disinterested refusal of all pay or reward, they are

distinguished by the honourable title of Anargyres, which signifies

moneyless, or without fees. These saints are commemorated on the 27th

September, and all over Europe have ever been the patron saints of the

Barbers and Surgeons; they are also the patrons of the Medici family,

and as such they figure on the coins of Florence.

1540. In the bowl of the grace cup given by Henry VIII to the

Barber-Surgeons, the arms of the Barbers impaling the Surgeons are cut,

but this is merely the fancy of an engraver, and of later date than the

cup.stration]

Pg468

10th July, 1561. In the Heralds’ College (I.C.B., No. 101, 20) is

a grant of arms by William Harvey, Clarencieux King of Arms, to

the Barber-Surgeons, in which he grants and assigns unto them for

an “augmentac͠on to ther old and aunscint Armes (which is sables a

chevrone between thre flumes argent) a chef paly argent & vert on a

pale goles a lyon passant regardant gold betwene two spatters argent a

roze gewles crowned golde & to ther creast upon the healme an opinacus

golde standing upon a wreath argent and sables manteled gewles dubled

argent.”

[Illustration]

1565. This year, Harvey, Clarencieux, granted two supporters to the

above arms, namely, “two lynxe in their proper Collor about there necks

a crowne with a cheyne argent.”

1568. This year, Garter, Clarencieux, and Norroy, Kings of Arms,

ratified and confirmed the above arms, crest, and supporters, with

the following variations, the arms to be borne quarterly, “the ffyrst

sables a cheveron bytwyne iij flewmes argent, the second quarter per

pale argent and vert on a spatter of the fyrst a Dobele rose gules and

argent crowned or, over all on a crosse gules a lyon passant Regardant

or.”

12th June, 1569. The grant of Arms by Dethick, etc., is a beautifully

artistic production, though, unfortunately, slightly damaged, and

the seals are missing. In 1885 the Company had it reproduced in

chromo-photography by Mr. William Griggs, whose work has been so

skilfully executed that it is difficult to observe the least difference

between the original and the copies.

[Illustration]

With this grant is the first appearance of a motto “De præscientia

Dei.” How this motto came to be chosen, or in what way it applies to

the Barber-Surgeons, I am at a loss to point out. The following is the

text of the grant.

The Annals of the Barber-Surgeons of London · 第 35 / 52 段