E. A. H. L.

_Ghost--Evidence of one not received._--In Ackerman's _Repository_, Nov.

1820, is a short account of a remarkable instance of a person being

tried on the pretended evidence of a ghost. A farmer on his return from

the market at Southam, co. Warwick, was murdered. The next morning a man

called upon the farmer's wife, and related how on the previous night, as

he lay in bed, quite awake, her husband's ghost had appeared to him, and

after showing him several stabs on his body, had told him that he was

murdered by a certain person, and his corpse thrown into a certain

marl-pit. A search was instituted, the body found in the pit, and the

wounds on the body of the deceased were exactly in the parts described

by the pretended dreamer; the person who was mentioned was committed for

trial on violent suspicion of murder, and the trial came on at Warwick

before Lord Chief Justice Raymond. The jury would have convicted the

prisoner as rashly as the magistrate had committed him, but for the

interposition of the judge, who told them that he did not put any credit

in the pretended ghost story, since the prisoner was a man of

unblemished reputation, and no ill feeling had ever existed between

himself and the deceased. He said that he knew of no law which admitted

of the evidence of a ghost; and if any did, the ghost had not appeared.

The crier was then ordered to summon the ghost, which he did three

times, and the judge then acquitted the prisoner, and caused the accuser

to be detained, which was accordingly done, and his house searched, when

such strong proofs of guilt were discovered, that the man confessed the

crime, and was executed for murder at the following assizes.

Could any of your readers inform me when this remarkable trial took

place, and where I could meet with a more detailed account?

Notes and Queries, Vol. V, Number 131, May 1, 1852 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 76 / 159 题