In the young generation of the civilized nations which is growing up

under such auspices, there is prevailing a certain physical and mental

weariness, which makes one seriously doubt whether the whole of modern

education must not be on the wrong track if, instead of producing

mental and physical power and joy in the lifelong acquisition of new

and newer knowledge, it only prematurely dulls and destroys all these

capacities, and if it is bringing on a too weakly organized and nervous

race which would as little prove a match for the onset of some horde

of healthy barbarians as did, once upon a time, the Roman or Greek

cosmopolitan culture, outwardly brilliant, but likewise undermined by

just such over-civilization as ours.

With this, we have arrived at once at the heart of our question. By

culture we must understand something greater, something other than

knowledge, or learnedness in special subjects, if it is at all to be

something beneficial and desirable. Relatively speaking, the most

striking result of general culture must be the healthy and vigorous

development of every man’s personality into a full and rounded human

life, inwardly at peace. Otherwise it will be of no very definite

value, either to himself or to his state.

If it does not effect this it does not justify the hopes that have, for

so long a time, been set upon it, and there may stand before us a time

such as humanity has already more than once experienced, when the most

highly civilized peoples have been overpowered by barbarians, simply

by virtue of greater physical strength and greater mental freshness

and originality, and when too delicately constituted republics have

not been in a condition to withstand the momentum of such onslaughts,

directed by some single powerful will.

Therefore the question “What is Culture?” is a question of the life of

our whole present race, as well as, in a special degree, of our native

land and the nature of its government.

I

By this very ambiguous and therefore often misunderstood word “culture”

we must understand ourselves to mean _an evolving_ from an originally

formless, rough condition into a condition in which the development

into the best of which the material is capable is completed, or at

least is in the process of unfolding without hindrance.

Every man at the beginning is a rough block that can only be fashioned

into a true human form and a true work of art partly by the formative

power of life itself with its manifold influences, and partly by the

hand and sagacity of men. And as an unskilful sculptor may so misshape

and spoil a stone intrusted to him that no real work of art can any

longer be made of it, or may carve it so delicately that it loses the

massiveness and strength necessary to resist all outer influences,

so also, in the art of human culture, we often speak from painful

experience of a man’s culture as neglected, or distorted, or too

excessive and refined.

In true culture (one that does not injure but benefits men), three

things seem to be essential: the conquering of natural sensuality

and natural selfishness through higher interests, the wholesome and

symmetrical training of the physical and mental faculties, and a

correct philosophical and religious conception of life. Where one of

these three is lacking, there is a drying up in the man of something

that had been capable of a better development.

1. The final goal of all true culture is the liberation of man from the

“sensual gravitation” which every one experiences in himself, and from

the selfishness which, though it rests in the final analysis upon man’s

impulse to self-preservation, stands nevertheless in opposition to the

purpose of his life. Essentially as a creature of the senses man begins

his course in this world, essentially as a creature of the spirit he

should finish it here, and, as we hope, continue it in another world

under more favorable conditions. Thus there lies already in his nature

a conflict between that which _is_ and therefore would naturally like

to persist, and that which is undoubtedly demanded by his deepest and

best feelings and which is meant to grow and develop. If he does not

stay as he is, then the ground seems at times to give way under his

feet; but if he does stay as he is, then his better self is always

grievously reproving him, and saying that he is not fulfilling his duty

and is not becoming what he could and should become. This is the battle

that every man begins with himself as soon as he comes to consciousness

about himself, and in this battle he must at any cost carry off the

victory.

All inward dissatisfaction springs from sensuality or selfishness;

these two never fail to show themselves as the primal causes, when the

matter is run to the ground. Any genuine happiness is not conceivable

where the spiritual nature has not gained the day over the sensual,

and where a disposition toward liberality, humanity, and kindliness

has not won the victory over a disposition to narrow selfishness--a

victory already decided in one’s innermost tendency, and, as a matter

of practical life, to be daily gained anew.

Whoever has not been able thus to subdue himself will never be a

match for the world around him, which fights him with the same though

thousand fold greater powers of selfishness. All that is left for him

is to defend himself in this struggle for existence by continually

injuring and destroying others and by uniting himself with others into

groups with mutual interests, groups that are likewise of a purely

selfish nature.

To try to suppress this struggle for existence which now threatens to

destroy all the nobility that is in man and to make us like beasts of

prey, is the chiefest task of all the truly cultured men of our time.

They must first show by their own example that this struggle is not

necessary, and that there is a way out of the labyrinths of this life

other than the sad one of who shall be strongest in his selfishness.

After all, the man who proves strongest in this struggle, even in the

most favorable case, only makes the existence of many fellow-men the

heavier, and his own better self, besides, has suffered harm.

The first step is, that one shall no longer be recognized as a truly

cultured man who has any trace of such a conception of life. And it

must and will come to that, before long, in our civilized states. On

the one hand, selfish solicitude for self and as much as possible of

sensual enjoyment during a short life--on the other, human kindness,

care for others, mental advancement, and the development of the nobler

powers of the soul: these are the two great armies which now stand over

against each other, ready for battle, and in one or the other you will

be obliged to take your place.

2. The second point is the proper and healthy physical and mental

development of all our faculties, in the interest of these higher aims.

We are not to live with this better conception of life in cloisters or

studies, but as far as possible to bring it into use in our ordinary

life and in every calling--but not, of course, in any calling that

stands in radical opposition to this better conception of life.

Here is the point where oftentimes a somewhat morbid and exaggerated

philosophical, religious, or scientific tendency stands likewise

opposed to true culture. There is no profit in a philosophy that does

not hold its own in the full current of life, and there is little help

in a religion which exists only in the church on Sundays and has no

value in the market or in business. And even knowledge, in itself, has

no great worth if it does not serve, somehow, to build up a more worthy

kind of life for oneself or for others.

In a sickly, overfatigued body, with nerves continually overexcited, no

quite healthy soul can live and work unimpeded. It is one of the chief

mistakes in the culture of our day that a kind of misunderstanding

has arisen between body and mind, whereby the body is harmed directly

and, through the body, the mind. Besides, our whole modern education

is much more directed toward the mechanical acquisition of things to

be remembered than to the attainment of real convictions and of true

knowledge.

3. But all these things, the pursuit of ideals, the search for true

knowledge, and the maintenance of bodily tone, do not yet help a man

toward true culture, unless they rest upon the conviction of the

existence of a transcendental world whose forces can effectively come

to his help. His sensual tendency and his natural selfishness are

far too strong for him to subdue them wholly by his own expedients

and without the help of such a Power residing outside himself. And

the motives for doing it are too weak. What indeed should impel him

to fight a hard and at first apparently almost fruitless battle with

himself and the surrounding world his life long, if this life is only a

transitory animal existence with no further destination?

The strength of a merely natural nobility, which for a time, perhaps,

may lift itself above these things, does not, under all circumstances,

hold out in the presence of this conception of life, but easily

despairs of itself when trials, continuing and great, draw nigh. There

must therefore be the introduction into human existence of a power

which is mightier than all a man’s natural forces and which makes it

possible for him to master himself and no longer to fear all external

evils, in comparison with the evil of high treason to his better self.

That there is such a power, which one can not indeed logically prove,

but which he can put to the test and himself experience,--this is

the mysterious truth of religion; and it would be much less of a

mystery if all men, if but once in their life, would venture the trial

whether there is such a power. To be sure, if any one does not want

to let quite go of his pleasure-seeking and selfishness, or does not

altogether yet desire to attain, at any cost, to something better than

the ordinary life, then, in spite of his trial, he will not have a

perfect experience of this power, and in that case the mere outward

profession of a religion does not help him much. He remains on the

whole as he is, even though he go to church every day.

But if he has this will, then he receives this power, then he

infallibly becomes another man, to such a degree that one may

truthfully call it a new birth. Then only will all his natural gifts

and knowledge become really alive in him and productive for the welfare

of himself and others.

The highest step is complete self-renunciation, in which a man is

only the receptacle of divine thoughts and impulses; but it is very

dangerous to work oneself into such a condition by the fantasy, before

it comes of itself and is really at hand. The main thing in religion

is not its immediate perfect attainment, but that every one who will

may enter on the way and pass from a joyless existence to a gradually

ascending life.

This is the way to true culture, and every one must try to travel it by

himself. It can not be taught; it can only be shown.

The evidence that one has true culture is, first, a gradually

increasing mental health and power, then a certain higher sagacity

that comes in, and finally a peculiar, larger caliber of spirit which

one can bring about in no other way, which one can not imitate, and

which really forms the chief element in culture. Yet these thoroughly

cultured men are, for all that, entirely natural human beings, but free

from all pretence and vanity; free also from all struggling, from all

seeking for life’s good things, on which human happiness does not have

to depend, and in whose incessant pursuit men only lose their souls;

free from all unhealthy pessimism, or monkish seclusion; free from fear

or nervousness or impatience; cheerful and quiet in the innermost

centre of their being, and continuing in their mental and spiritual

soundness up to the highest goal of human life. “As their days, so is

their strength,” as the Old Testament says with great beauty and truth.

The highest imaginable degree of this culture is a complete devotion

to all that is good and great, a devotion that no sort of trouble any

longer clouds, or can cloud; it is that condition of the soul, mentally

conceivable but seemingly rarely attained, in which there is no longer

any battle with the sensual and the transitory, and the struggle of

nature against the law of the spirit is completely at end.

This is that condition of perfection which we ascribe, in its

consummate development, to the Divine Being alone, but toward which we

also are called to strive; and the gradual winning of all men to this

goal is the task in particular of all true education, and looked at in

the whole, it is the end to which all history is moving.

II

No false culture nor half-culture is therefore to be compared with this

true culture, which is unmistakable in its effects upon the whole

nature of men, and upon their manner of intercourse with others. Even

in the very simple relations of life it will always reveal itself by a

certain greatness of spirit it confers, a spirit that distinguishes its

possessor from the ordinary man in the like ranks of life. And along

with this there is a quiet sense of peace with oneself and with others

such as no other philosophy of life can assure, and which, by its

contagious serenity, is apparent to every one who has ever been with

such people.

However, it is not wholly unnecessary, particularly at the present

time, to set down the chief characteristics of a false or insufficient

culture, characteristics which one meets very often and can not help

but notice. They are particularly the following:

1. Great extravagance in living. A man of genuine culture will never

set a _very_ high value either upon his outward personal appearance,

or upon where he lives, or what he eats and drinks, or the like

things: and so he will carefully avoid luxury, as improper for himself

and unjust toward others. Excessive finery, golden rings on all the

fingers, watch chains with which one might, if necessary, tie a calf,

houses in which one can not move for the furniture, banquets at which

one risks undermining even a robust constitution--these are all quite

sure signs of a lack of culture and things that one must guard against.

For whoever has intelligence sees through all this; it is only the

fools who are blinded by it. The surest mark of culture in all these

things is a certain noble, easy simplicity in one’s whole personal

appearance and manner of life.

The love of display and pleasure is always a sign of lacking culture,

and culture alone can thoroughly guard against it. Even a general

raising of the standard of life in a country is desirable only in so

far as a rough, half-animal, unworthy mode of living is by its means

done away with; otherwise a continual increase in men’s needs is a

misfortune for any country, and the cultured classes must earnestly

strive against it and set a better example. A noble simplicity of

living has also the advantage that it can always remain the same under

any circumstances, while people inclined to luxury usually have two

modes of living, one before people, and the other for themselves.

2. An external, but also very easily recognizable and characteristic

mark of culture is the possession or absence of books; especially with

persons who have the most ample means of procuring them. A fine lady

who reads a soiled volume from a lending library you may safely set

down as but half-cultured at best, and if she slips an embroidered

cover over the volume, it does not remedy the matter; it only shows

that she is conscious of her fault. An elegant home in which but a

dozen books stand unread on an ornamental whatnot you may quietly

regard as uncultured, with all its inmates; especially if, as usual,

the books are only novels.

Much reading still remains, in our day as always, a necessity of

general culture. Of a thoroughly cultured man one can properly require

that in the course of a moderately long life he shall have read all

of the very best in literature, and shall have gained, besides, a

tolerably general and correct idea of all the branches of human

knowledge, so that “nothing of human is to him quite alien.”

But if you ask how one can get time for this, outside of one’s business

or occupation, the answer is this: Break away from all unnecessary

things, from the hotel, from societies, clubs, and social pleasures,

from the useless reading of a great portion of the newspapers, from the

theatre, where you learn little that is worth knowing in these days,

from the too frequent concerts, from skating for whole afternoons, and

from much else besides that every one can easily charge against himself

as his special manner of squandering time. One can not be very cultured

and at the same time enjoy all the possible pleasures going.

But, if necessary, you may even break away somewhat from business. That

pays, and you will soon see what a difference there is, even as regards

business success, between a cultured merchant and a merely clever

manager.

3. A further sign of defective culture is a loud, rude nature: talking

very loud, in public localities, in cars, in restaurants, etc.;

acting as if one were the only person there; and conducting oneself

discourteously in places where many men gather. Our age is less

cultured in this respect than some earlier ones have been.

On the same footing stands everything that savors of advertising and

boasting, all showy pretence and braggadocio. A merchant, for example,

who greatly exaggerates the importance of his business, or puts very

boastful advertisements in the papers; or a lady who wears a silk dress

without quite immaculate undergarments--those surely you would not take

for people of sufficient culture.

4. Work also belongs to culture. It is not only a quite indispensable

means of attaining thereto, but idleness, even if one can “afford”

it, is always the mark of a disposition with low ideals; and that is

directly opposed to culture. Such a man will seek his pleasure in

something else, something less fine, or will possess a foolish pride

in not being obliged to work, or finally he is a fellow of coarse

sensibilities to whom it is a matter of indifference whether others

perish by his side whom he could have helped by his exertions.

An idler by profession is therefore surely a man without ideals and

without real culture, however elegant may be the external forms of

culture he has gathered round him. They are empty forms without real

substance, and every man of better culture is bound not to allow

himself to be deceived thereby and not to respect such people.

5. But not much less harmful is the inordinate passion for work. When

it is voluntary, it nearly always springs from ambition or greed, two

of the worst enemies of true culture; they always show that one sets

the highest value upon something else than culture. Or this passion

for work is only a bad habit and the imitation of a bad example, or

finally it may spring from a want of inner peace and control, which are

themselves the fruit of culture.

Whoever works on Sundays just the same as on week-days, when he is not

compelled to, you may quietly consider as little cultured as the man

who does nothing any day.

6. A very necessary element in culture is an absolute trustworthiness

and an upright conduct in all money-matters. To the cultured man it is

not permitted to display prodigality, or an aristocratic contempt for

money; a disposition like that always indicates lack of culture, and is

unjust toward one’s needy fellow-men, besides being mostly pretence.

Nor is it permitted him, on the other hand, to show undue parsimony,

nor dishonesty even in the smallest particulars. On this point, the

Scriptures say quite truly: “He that is faithful in a very little is

faithful also in much.”

An absolutely rightful employment of money, with the strictest honesty,

with complete disregard for money as the goal of life, and yet with

a proper valuation of it as the means of attaining higher ends, is

perhaps the surest of all signs of a man of genuine culture; as the

chase after gains and the worship of money most surely betrays the

uncultured man.

7. Another sufficient indication of defective culture is arrogance

toward inferiors or toward those who are poorer off, and this is

usually combined with subservience toward superiors and toward the

wealthy. This is the special characteristic of parvenus who spring

from uncultured surroundings. A man of the best culture will always be

polite and friendly, but the more so, the more he has to do with those

who stand below him, with the dependent or the oppressed; and the less

so, even to the bare edge of politeness, the more he has to do with

some one who makes pretensions, or wants to treat him as an inferior.

To show deep respect for the mere wealth of another is, as said before,

the most unmistakable mark of a man completely lacking in any culture

of his own.

8. There are still a number of minor signs of lack of culture, which

may, however, be in part only bad habits or the result of defective

bringing up; they do not always point conclusively to a general lack of

culture. Among these minor signs one may rightly reckon: much talking

about oneself; gossip and scandal over the personal affairs of others;

a great tendency to talkativeness on all occasions; a hasty, uncertain,

violent temperament; making many excuses for oneself where it is not

necessary or has already been done; to accuse or disparage oneself

in the hope that others will then assert the contrary; a too-zealous

officiousness; or a too-effusive politeness.

The thoroughly fine aristocratic temperament, such as the English

especially prefer, demands a very great self-possession and

preciseness; but this can easily degenerate into indifference and

coldness, and is then a fault. Enthusiasm and eagerness for whatever is

good a cultured man always possesses; where this is lacking, there is

also a lack of true culture, in spite of fine pretences.

But this is also certain: when the enthusiasm is genuine and is not

merely manufactured or the zeal of a beginner in the noble art of life,

then it will never be too forward and loud in expressing itself. A

noisy virtue is always a little suspicious, or at least is still in its

infancy.

Culture, therefore, is essentially the gradual development of inner

power toward what is right and true, with the purpose of elevating

and liberating one’s own higher nature from the bonds of the ordinary

animal sensuality with which it came into the world, and of training it

up to a higher level of life in complete soundness of mind and body.

Wherever it does not do this, it is of very subordinate value; and this

it must always above all things do in the so-called cultured classes,

for whom this is a primal duty.

It noway suffices to be always talking of the “elevation of the lower

classes,” who are often superior now to the upper in particular

elements of true culture. The chief need of our present day is much

rather the vigorous rehabilitation of this upper class, which is deeply

sunk in pleasure-seeking and the materialistic conception of things,

and has turned aside from the higher ends of life.

III

Now if you should resolve to try in this manner to attain to true

culture, you must have great patience with yourself. It is not the

matter of a single day or of a single resolution, although a great part

is played by making, once for all, a firm and binding resolve, to which

one always comes back again as often as one has in some particular

departed from it.

True culture, like true virtue in the main, is a matter of growth. By

degrees it grows in strength and insight, but can not be suddenly and

forcibly won by any kind of magic process; one must make some definite

beginning and then persevere in it for life. But this is the only true

purpose of living, never to be laid aside, and the only outcome of life

wholly to be wished.

The steps of life: further essays on happiness · 第 5 / 12 段