BISHOP WILSON'S CENSURES

But Bishop Wilson set about his task with a strong heart, and a resolute

hand. He found himself in a twofold trust. Since the Reformation, the

monasteries and nunneries had been dispersed, and all the baronies had

been broken up, save one, the barony of the Bishop. Thus Bishop Wilson

was the head of the court of his barony. This was a civil court with

power, of jurisdiction over felonies. Its separate criminal control came

to an end in 1777, Such was Bishop Wilson's position as last and sole

Baron of Man. Then as head of the Church he had powers over offences

which were once called offences against common law. Irregular behaviour,

cursing, quarrelling, and drinking, as well as transgressions of the

moral code, adultery, seduction, prostitution, and the like, were

punishable by the Church and the Church courts. The censures of Bishop

Wilson on such offences did not err on the side of clemency. He was

the enemy of sin, and no "gentle foe of sinners." He was a believer

in witchcraft, and for suspicion of commerce with evil spirits and

possession of the evil eye he punished many a blameless old body. For

open and convicted adultery he caused the offenders to stand for an hour

at high fair at each of the market-places of Douglas, Peel, Ramsey, and

Castletown, bearing labels on their breasts calling on all people

to take warning lest they came under the same Church censure. Common

unchastity he punished by exposure in church at full congregation, when

the guilty man or the poor victimised girl stepped up from the west

porch to the altar, covered from neck to heels in a white sheet.

Slanderers and evil speakers he clapped into the Peel, or perhaps the

whipping-stocks, with tongue in a noose of leather, and when after a

lapse of time the gag was removed the liberated tongue was obliged to

denounce itself by saying thrice, clearly, boldly, probably with good

accent and discretion, "False tongue, thou hast lied."

It is perhaps as well that some of us did not live in Bishop Wilson's

time. We might not have lived long. If the Church still held and

exercised the same powers over evil speakers we should never hear our

own ears in the streets for the din of the voices of the penitents; and

if it still punished unchastity in a white sheet the trade of the linen

weaver would be brisk.

You will say that I have justified my statement that Bishop Wilson was

the bitterest of tyrants. Let me now establish my opinion that he was

also the serenest of saints. I have told you how low was the condition

of the Church, how lax its rule, how deep its clergy lay in sloth and

ignorance, and perhaps also in vice, when Bishop Wilson came to Man in

1698. Well, in 1703, only five years later, the Lord Chancellor King

said this: "If the ancient discipline of the Church were lost elsewhere

it might be found in all its force in the Isle of Man." This points

first to force and vigour on the Bishop's part, but surely it also

points to purity of character and nobility of aim. Bishop Wilson began

by putting his own house in order. His clergy ceased to gamble and to

drink, and they were obliged to collect their tithes with mercy. He once

suspended a clergyman for an opinion on a minor point, but many times he

punished his clergy for offences against the moral law and the material

welfare of the poor. In a stiff fight for integrity of life and purity

of thought, he spared none. I truly believe that if he had caught

himself in an act of gross injustice he would have clambered up into

the pillory. He was a brave, strong-hearted creature, of the build of

a great man. Yes! In spite of all his contradictions, he _was_ a great

man. We Manxmen shall never look upon his like again!

The Little Manx Nation - 1891 · 第 41 / 70 题