CHAP. I.

Poggio,[1] the son of Guccio Bracciolini, was born on the eleventh day

of February, in the year 1380,[2] at Terranuova, a small town situated

in the territory of the republic of Florence, not far from Arezzo.

He derived his baptismal name from his grandfather,[3] concerning

whose occupation and circumstances, the scanty memorials of the times

in which he lived, do not furnish any satisfactory information.[4]

From his father, Poggio inherited no advantages of rank or fortune.

Guccio Bracciolini, who exercised the office of notary, was once

indeed possessed of considerable property; but being either by his own

imprudence, or by misfortune, involved in difficulties, he had recourse

to the destructive assistance of an usurer, by whose rapacious artifices,

his ruin was speedily completed, and he was compelled to fly from the

pursuit of his creditors.[5]

But whatever might be the disadvantages under which Poggio laboured,

in consequence of the embarrassed state of his father’s fortune, in a

literary point of view the circumstances of his birth were singularly

propitious. At the close of the fourteenth century, the writings of

Petrarca and Bocaccio were read with avidity, and the labours of those

eminent revivers of letters had excited throughout Italy the emulation

of the learned. The day-star had now pierced through the gloom of mental

night, and the dawn of literature was gradually increasing in brilliancy.

The city of Florence was, at this early period, distinguished by the

zeal with which its principal inhabitants cultivated and patronized

the liberal arts. It was consequently the favourite resort of the

ablest scholars of the time, some of whom were induced by the offer of

considerable salaries, to undertake the task of public instruction.

In this celebrated school, Poggio applied himself to the study of the

Latin tongue, under the direction of Giovanni Malpaghino, more commonly

known by the appellation of John of Ravenna. This eminent scholar had,

for a period of nearly fifteen years, been honoured by the friendship,

and benefited by the precepts of Petrarca, under whose auspices he made

considerable progress in the study of morals, history, and poetry.

After the death of his illustrious patron, he delivered public lectures

on polite literature, first at Venice, and afterwards at Florence. At

the latter place, besides Poggio, the following celebrated literary

characters were formed by his instructions—Leonardo Aretino, Pallas

Strozza, Roberto Rossi, Paulo Vergerio the elder, Omnebuono Vicentino,

Guarino Veronese, Carlo Aretino, Ambrogio Traversari, and Francesco

Barbaro.[6]

It has been asserted by most of the writers who have given an account of

the early history of Poggio, that he acquired a knowledge of the Greek

language at the Florentine University under the tuition of the celebrated

Manuel Crysoloras—but it is evident from a letter addressed by him to

Niccolo Niccoli, that he did not commence his Greek studies till the year

1424, when he entered upon them at Rome, trusting for success in this

new pursuit to his own industry, guided by the occasional instructions

of a friend of his of the name of Rinuccio, an accomplished scholar, who

afterwards became secretary to Pope Nicholas V.[7]

When he had attained a competent knowledge of the Latin language,

Poggio quitted Florence, and went to Rome in the year 1403. Soon after

his arrival in that city, on the recommendation of his venerated tutor

Coluccio Salutati, he obtained the appointment of secretary to the

Cardinal Rudulfo Maramori, Bishop of Bari; and in the month of August

or September in the ensuing year, he entered into the service of the

reigning pontiff Boniface IX. in the capacity of writer of the apostolic

letters.[8]

A. D. 1403.—At the time of Poggio’s admission into the pontifical

chancery, Italy was convulsed by war and faction. The kingdom of Naples

was exposed to the horrors of anarchy, consequent upon a disputed

succession to the throne. Many of the cities of Lombardy, now the

unresisting prey of petty tyrants, now struggling to throw off the

yoke, were the miserable theatres of discord and of bloodshed. The

ambition of the Lord of Milan carried fire and sword from the borders of

Venice to the gates of Florence. The ecclesiastical state was exposed

to the predatory incursions of banditti; and the cities over which, as

portions of the patrimony of St. Peter, the pope claimed the exercise

of authority, took advantage of the weakness of the Roman court to free

themselves from its oppression. At the same time, the lustre of the

pontificate was dimmed by the schism, which for the space of more than

twenty years had divided the sentiments, and impaired the spiritual

allegiance of the Christian community.

As this celebrated ecclesiastic feud, which is commonly distinguished by

the name of the Schism of the West, commenced only two years before the

birth of Poggio; as no fewer than five of his patrons were implicated in

its progress and consequences, and as it was terminated by the council

of Constance, which assembly he attended in quality of secretary to John

XXII. it will be necessary to enter a little at large into its history.

The joy experienced by the inhabitants of Rome, on the translation of

the papal court from Avignon to its ancient residence, by Gregory XI.

was suddenly damped by the death of that pontiff, which event took

place on the 28th of March, 1378. The Romans were apprehensive, that

if the choice of the conclave should fall upon a native of France, he

would again remove the holy see beyond the Alps.[9] They sighed for

the restoration of that splendor, with which the pomp of the successors

of St. Peter had formerly graced their city. Their breasts glowed with

indignation, when they saw the states of the church, in consequence

of the absence of its chief, successively falling under the dominion

of usurpers. During the residence of the popes at Avignon, the devout

pilgrimages, once so copious a source of gain to the inhabitants of the

capital of Christendom, had been suspended; the tombs of the martyrs

had been neglected, and the churches were fast hastening to decay.

Dreading the renewal and the aggravation of these evils, the Roman clergy

and populace assembled in a tumultuous manner, and signified to the

cardinals, who happened to be at Rome at the time of the death of Gregory

XI. their earnest wishes, that they would appoint some illustrious

Italian to fill the pontifical chair. Amidst the clamours of the people,

the conclave was held in the Vatican, under the protection of a guard

of soldiers. This assembly was composed of thirteen French and four

Italian cardinals. Notwithstanding this preponderance of ultramontane

suffrages, in consequence, as Platina says, of a disagreement among

the French,[10] or more probably, as was afterwards alleged by the

Gallic ecclesiastics, in consequence of the overawing influence of the

Roman populace, the election was concluded in favor of a Neapolitan,

Bartolomeo, Archbishop of Bari, on whom the conclave conferred the name

of Urban VI.[11] The French cardinals, after protesting against his

nomination to the papal chair, as an act in which they had been obliged

to concur through a dread of rousing the popular indignation, fled from

the city. In the course of a little time, however, they returned to Rome,

and made their peace with Urban by confirming his election, and paying

him the customary homage. But this reconciliation was not lasting. The

manners of Urban were haughty and stern, and his disposition was severe

and revengeful. Disgusted by his pride, and dreading the effects of his

resentment, the foreign cardinals again withdrew, first to Anagni, and

afterwards to Fondi, a town situated in the territories of Naples. Here,

being emboldened by the protection of Joanna, queen of that country,

they renewed their protest against the election of Urban, and proceeding

to form a new conclave, they proclaimed the cardinal of Ginevra, under

the name of Clement VII. the true successor of St. Peter. This was the

beginning of that schism, which for so long a space of time perplexed

the true believers, by the inexplicable phenomenon of the co-existence

of two supreme and infallible heads of the church, each proscribing

his competitor, and fulminating the terrors of damnation against the

adherents of his rival.

In this contest the Gallic cardinals did not restrict themselves to the

use of spiritual weapons. They assembled a body of mercenary soldiers,

whom they employed in making an incursion into the Roman territory.

These troops were at first successful in their operations; but engaging

the pontifical army near Marina, they were defeated with considerable

loss.[12]

The resentful spirit of Urban, stimulated by the hostile conduct of the

rebellious cardinals, prompted him to meditate a severe revenge. He

instantly dispatched an ambassador to Lodovico, king of Hungary, with

instructions to proffer to that monarch his assistance in punishing the

queen of Naples, for the imputed murder of her husband Andrew, brother to

the Hungarian sovereign, who it was alleged had, with her concurrence,

been put to death by Luigi, prince of Taranto.[13] Lodovico, who had long

thirsted for vengeance, eagerly accepted the offers of Urban, and gave

orders to Carlo, son of Luigi di Durazzo, the descendant of Charles II.

and heir apparent to the throne of Naples, to march with the Hungarian

troops, which were then engaged in hostilities against the Venetians, and

to co-operate with the pope in an attack upon the kingdom of Naples.[14]

Carlo, after taking Arezzo, and making peace with the Florentines on the

condition of their lending him forty thousand crowns of gold, repaired

to Rome, where he held a conference with Urban. Thence he directed his

march to Naples, of which city he easily made himself master. Joanna,

after sustaining a short siege in the Castello Nuovo, was taken prisoner,

and, according to the directions of the inexorable king of Hungary,

smothered between two mattresses.[15]

This vindictive deed being perpetrated, Urban repaired to Naples, and,

according to the terms of an agreement which had been concluded before

the departure of the prince of Hungary from Rome, he demanded, on

behalf of his nephew, the possession of the principality of Capua, and

of several other places in the kingdom of Naples. On Carlo’s refusing

to accede to this demand, Urban, with characteristic impetuosity, had

recourse to threats, to which the king answered by putting the pontiff

for some days under an arrest. Urban, dissembling his indignation,

requested, and obtained of the prince, permission to retire to Nocera for

the benefit of his health. The first step which he took on his arrival

at that place, was to strengthen its fortifications, and recruit its

garrison. He then proceeded to the nomination of new cardinals, and

threw seven members of the sacred college into prison, alleging, that

at the instigation of Carlo, and of his rival Clement, they had formed

a conspiracy against his life. Having cited the Neapolitan monarch to

appear and answer to the charges which he had to prefer against him, he

proceeded to his trial. Carlo treated the summons with contempt, and sent

Count Alberico, grand constable of his kingdom, at the head of an army

to lay siege to Nocera. Urban, escaping from that city, embarked with his

prisoners on board some Genoese galleys, which had been prepared to aid

his flight. Exasperated to the highest degree of cruelty, the fugitive

pontiff vented his fury on the captive cardinals, five of whom he caused

to be tied up in sacks, and thrown into the sea.[16]

On the death of Carlo, who, having usurped the throne of Hungary, which

belonged of right to Maria, the daughter of the late monarch, was

murdered by assassins hired by the deposed queen, Urban endeavoured to

make himself master of the kingdom of Naples. Being frustrated in this

attempt, he returned to Rome, where he died on the 15th of October, 1389.

We may easily credit the assertion of Platina, that “few were the persons

who wept at his death.”

Poggio, in a letter to Angelotto, cardinal of St. Mark, ascribes the

violent conduct of Urban to a derangement of intellect, consequent upon

his elevation to the pontifical dignity;[17] and he has recorded in his

Facetiæ an anecdote, which may be quoted as proving the prevalence of an

opinion that he was afflicted with insanity.[18]

A. D. 1389.—Urban was succeeded by Boniface IX. a Neapolitan, of the

family of the Tomacelli, who was raised to the chair of St. Peter

at the early age of thirty years.[19] The distracted state of Italy

required indeed the exertions of a pontiff endowed with the vigour and

activity of the prime of life. That beautiful country was the devoted

prey of war, rapine, and civil discord. The native country of Poggio

did not escape the general calamity. Galeazzo, lord of Milan, having

declared war against Florence and Bologna, sent a powerful body of

forces under the command of Giovanni Ubaldino, with orders to lay waste

the territories of those states. In this extremity, the Florentines

dispatched a considerable army, under the command of their general

Auguto, to make a diversion in the Milanese, and successfully solicited

the assistance of Stephen, duke of Bavaria, and of the count d’Armagnac.

The campaign was opened with brilliancy by the conquest of Padua; but

the duke of Bavaria, having been seduced from his fidelity to his allies

by the tempting offers of the enemy, returned to his own dominions. The

count d’Armagnac, descending into Italy by the way of Turin, with the

intention of co-operating with Auguto, who had advanced to Bergamo, was

also successful in his first operations. But his troops, encountering

the enemy under the walls of Alessandria, were put to the rout, and

the count himself, exhausted by his exertions, was carried a prisoner

into the town, where he soon afterwards expired in consequence, it is

said, of drinking a copious draught of cold water. In these critical

circumstances, the Florentines were greatly indebted to the extraordinary

military talents of Auguto, who with an inferior force, effected a

retreat through the heart of the Milanese, and held in check the army

of Galeazzo, which had made an irruption into the Tuscan territories.

Both parties being at length weary of a contest which was productive

only of mutual injury, they listened to the paternal admonitions of

Boniface, who interposed between them in the quality of mediator; and,

under the auspices of the pontiff and the duke of Genoa, a peace was

concluded between Galeazzo and the Florentines, on the basis of mutual

restitution.[20]

When will a sufficient number of instances have been recorded by the pen

of history, of nations harrassing each other by the outrages of war,

and after years of havock and bloodshed, when exhausted by exertions

beyond their natural strength, agreeing to forget the original subject of

dispute, and mutually to resume the station which they occupied at the

commencement of the contest. “Were subjects wise,” what would be their

reflections, when their rulers, after the most lavish waste of blood,

coolly sit down and propose to each other the _status quo ante bellum_.

Happy would it be, could the _status quo_ be extended to the widow and

the orphan—to the thousands and tens of thousands, who, in consequence

of the hardships and accidents of war, are doomed to languish out the

remnant of their lives in torment and decrepitude.

A. D. 1393.—In the year 1393, the antipope Clement VII. dying at Avignon,

the schismatic cardinals, still persisting in their rebellion against the

Italian pontiff, elected as the legitimate successor of St. Peter, Pietro

da Luna, who assumed the name of Benedict XIII.[21]

For the space of five years after the pacification of Genoa, Florence

enjoyed the blessings of peace; but at the end of that period its

tranquillity was again disturbed by the ambition of Galeazzo, who had

now obtained from the emperor Wenceslaus, the title of duke of Milan.

This turbulent chieftain, being encouraged by the death of Auguto,[22]

the experienced commander of the Florentine forces, sent into Tuscany

a strong body of troops, which made incursions to the very gates of the

capital. Ruin and devastation attended the progress of the Milanese

forces, who laid waste the country with fire and sword, and led a great

number of the inhabitants into captivity. The following letter, addressed

on a similar occasion by Poggio to the chancellor of Siena, is at once a

document of the misery to which the small states of Italy were at this

time exposed in consequence of the wasteful irruptions of their enemies,

and a record of the benevolent dispositions of the writer’s heart.

“I could have wished that our correspondence had commenced on other

grounds than the calamity of a man for whom I have a great regard, and

who has been taken captive, together with his wife and children, whilst

he was engaged in the cultivation of my estate. I am informed that he and

one of his sons are now languishing in the prisons of Siena. Another of

his children, a boy of about five years of age is missing, and it is not

known whether he is dead or alive. What can exceed the misery of this

lamentable destiny? I wish these distresses might fall upon the heads of

their original authors: but alas! the wretched rustics pay the forfeit of

the crimes of others. When I reflect on the situation of those on whose

behalf I now intercede with you, my writing is interrupted by my tears.

For I cannot help contemplating in the eye of imagination the woe-worn

aspect of the father—the pallid countenance of the mother—the exquisite

grief of the unhappy son. They have lost every thing except their life,

which is bereft of all its comforts. For the father, the captors demand,

by way of ransom, ten, for the son, forty florins. These sums it is

impossible for them to raise, as they have been deprived of their all by

the rapacity of the soldiers, and if they do not meet with assistance

from the well-disposed, they must end their days in captivity. I take

the liberty of earnestly pressing this case upon your consideration, and

I entreat you to use your utmost exertions to redeem these unfortunate

people on the lowest terms possible. If you have any regard for my

entreaties, or if you feel that affection which is due from one friend

to another, I beseech you with all possible importunity to undertake the

care of this wretched family, and save them from the misery of perishing

in prison. This you may effect by exerting your interest to get their

ransom fixed at a low rate. Whatever must be paid on this account, must

be advanced by me. I trust my friend Pietro will, if it be necessary,

assist you in this affair. I must request you to give me an answer,

informing me what you can do, or rather what you have done, to serve

me in this matter. I say what you have done, for I know you are able,

and I trust you are willing to assist me. But I must hasten to close my

letter, lest the misery of these unhappy people should be prolonged by my

delay.”[23]

The uneasiness which the Florentines experienced, in consequence of the

hostile incursions of Galeazzo’s forces, was considerably augmented by

the accession of territory and of strength, which that enterprising

warrior at this time obtained by the acquisition of the cities of

Bologna, Pisa, Siena, and several fortresses bordering on the territories

of the republic. Perugia also having thrown off its allegiance to the

pope, had sheltered itself from his indignation under the protection of

the duke of Milan.[24]

The year of the jubilee was now approaching, and the Romans, ever

delighted with the frivolity of magnificent spectacles, sent a deputation

to Boniface, who had studiously withdrawn from Rome, requesting him

to honour his capital with his presence. With this request, Boniface

hesitated to comply, alleging, as the reason of his hesitation, that the

choice of magistrates, which the Roman people had lately made, was by no

means pleasing to him. Unwilling to forego the amusements and profits

of the approaching festival, the compliant citizens of Rome gratified

the pontiff with the selection of the principal officers of state, and

moreover, supplied him with a considerable sum of money. Boniface, in

return for these acts of submission, vouchsafed to make his public

entry into Rome; and employed the money which he had received, as the

price of his condescension, in fortifying the Mole of Adrian, in modern

times better known by the name of the castle of St. Angelo, and other

posts, which gave him the command of the city. Thus had the Romans the

satisfaction of celebrating the jubilee with extraordinary pomp, at the

expense of the remnant of their liberty.[25]

A. D. 1400.—In the mean time the Florentines, being hard pressed by

the duke of Milan, derived a ray of hope from the assistance of the

newly-elected emperor Robert duke of Bavaria, who promised to come to

their aid, with a powerful body of troops. The joy which they felt on

this occasion was however but of short continuance; for soon after his

entrance into Italy, the emperor was totally defeated by the duke of

Milan, and the remnant of his army being driven over the mountains,

was obliged to take shelter in the city of Trent. By the retreat of

the imperial troops, the Florentines were reduced to the utmost

extremity. Abandoned by their allies, and exposed to the inroads of

their neighbours, they implored the assistance of Boniface. The pontiff,

who felt deep resentment against Galeazzo on account of his seizure of

several cities in the ecclesiastical state, readily entered into the

views of the Florentines, and without hesitation concluded a treaty,

by which he engaged to bring into the field an army of five thousand

men, which was to co-operate with the Tuscan forces. But soon after the

commencement of the campaign, the Florentines were happily relieved

from their anxiety, by the death of their inveterate enemy Galeazzo,

whose career of conquest was terminated by a fever, of which he died at

Marignano,[26] on the third of September, 1402. Soon after the death of

this powerful prince, many cities, of which he had at different times

forcibly taken possession, were seized by various petty tyrants, who took

advantage of the odium excited by the vices of his son and successor

Giovanni Maria; and Boniface availed himself of the general confusion

to reduce Bologna and Perugia to their ancient allegiance to the papal

see.[27]

It has been already observed, that Poggio arrived in Rome in the year

1403. He was then in the twenty-fourth year of his age. At this dangerous

season, though animated with a lively fancy, and stimulated by an ardent

constitution, he was not allured into dissipation, by the temptations

of a corrupt and luxurious court. We learn indeed from the introductory

conversation of his dialogue on Avarice, that the appointments of the

pontifical secretaries were not very splendid. Antonio Lusco, one of

the interlocutors in that dialogue, is there represented as declaring,

that their income was scarcely sufficient to maintain the dignity of

their office.[28] It is probable therefore, that the scantiness of

Poggio’s revenues had no unfavorable influence on his moral conduct and

his studies. In the preface to his _Historia disceptativa convivialis_,

he acknowledges, that he frequently had recourse to literary pursuits,

in order to beguile the anxiety which he experienced in consequence of

the narrowness of his circumstances.[29] Poverty is not unfrequently

the parent of knowledge, and the stern, but salutary guardian of virtue.

Whatever might be the cause, certain it is, that Poggio diligently

devoted his leisure hours to study, and cultivated the acquaintance of

those whose conversation might tend to the improvement of his mind. As

literary pursuits had at this æra acquired the currency of fashion,

the character of the scholar was frequently found united with that of

the man of the world. To this circumstance we may ascribe the union of

learning, politeness, and knowledge of the human heart, which shines so

conspicuously in the writings of Poggio.

On the 1st October, 1404, Poggio sustained a considerable loss by the

death of his patron, Boniface IX. “Nothing would have been wanting,” says

Platina, “to complete the glory of this pontiff, had he not tarnished the

lustre of his fame by his excessive partiality towards his relations.

These flocked in crowds to Rome; and the numerous acts of simony of

which they were guilty, greatly impaired the authority of the keys.”[30]

A. D. 1404.—On the death of Boniface, Cosmo, cardinal of Santa Croce, was

elected to the pontificate, and assumed the name of Innocent VII. The

new pontiff was by no means insensible of the merits of Poggio, whom he

continued in the office to which he had been promoted by the favour of

Boniface. He appears indeed to have treated him with particular kindness

and respect. Poggio availed himself of his interest with Innocent, to

testify the sincerity of his friendship for Leonardo Aretino, who during

his residence at Florence, had been the associate of his studies, and

the companion of his festive hours. Leonardo, whose paternal appellation

was Bruni, derived the name of Aretino from Arezzo, in which city he was

born in the year 1370. His parents, though not graced by the honours

of nobility, held a respectable rank in society, and were sufficiently

wealthy to be enabled to bestow on their son a good education.[31]

In his early youth, Leonardo was incited to a love of letters by an

extraordinary accident. A body of French troops, who were marching to

Naples to assist Louis duke of Anjou in maintaining his claim to the

sovereignty of that kingdom, at the solicitation of the partizans of a

faction which had been banished from Arezzo, made an unexpected attack

upon that city; and after committing a great slaughter, carried many of

the inhabitants into captivity; and among the rest the family of Bruni.

Leonardo being confined in a chamber in which was hung a portrait of

Petrarca, by daily contemplating the lineaments of that illustrious

scholar, conceived so strong a desire to signalize himself by literary

acquirements, that immediately upon his enlargement he repaired to

Florence, where he prosecuted his studies with unremitting diligence,

under the direction of John of Ravenna and Manuel Crysoloras.[32]

During his residence at Florence, he contracted a strict intimacy with

Poggio. This intimacy was not interrupted by the separation of the

two friends, which took place upon the removal of the latter to Rome.

On the contrary, Poggio being informed by Leonardo, that he wished to

procure a presentation to some place of honour and emolument in the Roman

chancery, took every opportunity of commending his virtues, and of

bringing his talents into public notice, by communicating his letters

to the literary characters who frequented the pontifical court.[33] In

consequence of Poggio’s address, the fame of Leonardo reached the ears

of Innocent, who was induced, by his extraordinary reputation, to invite

him to Rome, at which city he arrived, March 24, 1405. On this occasion

the interest of Leonardo was powerfully promoted by a letter addressed

to Innocent, by Coluccio Salutati,[34] the chancellor of the city of

Florence, in which he detailed the merits of the young candidate in the

most flattering terms. The reception which Leonardo met with on his first

presentation at the pontifical court, though in some respects flattering,

was on the whole inauspicious. Innocent observed to him in the presence

of his courtiers, that he seemed to be in every other respect well

qualified for the place to which he aspired; but that an office of

great trust required more discretion than could be expected from his

early years. This observation stimulated Jacopo d’Angelo, a scholar of

considerable reputation, who had formerly been a rival of Leonardo in the

Florentine university, to offer himself as a candidate for the office

in question. The age of Jacopo was more mature than that of Leonardo,

and a residence of four years in the pontifical court seemed to give a

decided superiority to his claims over those of the stranger.[35] Poggio

sympathized in the disappointment and anxiety of his friend. Fortunately

however for Leonardo, Innocent having at this time received certain

letters from the duke of Berry, determined to assign to each of the

competitors, the task of drawing up an answer to them. The compositions

of the two candidates being compared, the prize was unanimously adjudged

to Leonardo, who was in consequence of this decision, instantly advanced

to the dignity of apostolic scribe. This transaction was the means of

cementing the friendship of Poggio and Leonardo, which endured, without

interruption till their union was severed by death.[36]

Before his accession to the chair of St. Peter, Innocent was accustomed

to blame the negligence and timidity of the Italian pontiffs, and to

attribute to their incapacity the continuance of the schism which gave

such occasion of triumph to the enemies of the true faith. But when he

was invested with the pontifical purple, he was convinced by mortifying

experience, that it was much easier to find fault with the conduct of his

predecessors, than to redress the grievances of Italy, and to restore

the peace of the church. [A. D. 1405.] He found himself indeed obliged

to exert all his power, to repress the spirit of liberty which prompted

the Roman people to demand the restitution of the capitol, the castle of

St. Angelo, and of the other places of strength which had been wrested

from them by the policy of his predecessors. The animosity excited in

the breasts of the populace, by the refusal of Innocent to accede to

these demands, was exasperated to the highest degree, by the culpable

impetuosity of his nephew Lodovico, who attacking a deputation of the

citizens, who had waited on the pontiff with a view of composing the

differences which subsisted between him and the people, had seized eleven

of their number, and put them to death. Two of these were members of

the council of seven, which presided over the city, and the remaining

nine were citizens of illustrious rank. Irritated by this act of cruel

treachery the populace flew to arms, and revenged the death of their

chiefs by the slaughter of several of the servants of the pontiff.

Innocent, who was unconscious of the treachery of his nephew, was

totally unprepared to resist the fury of the multitude. The pontifical

residence was indeed strongly fortified; but it was not furnished with

sufficient provisions to be enabled to stand a siege; and the troops of

Ladislaus, king of Naples, were said to be hastening to the assistance

of the insurgents. In this extremity, Innocent determined to seek his

safety in flight. He accordingly left the palace, under the escort of a

sufficient guard, at two o’clock in the afternoon of the sixth of August,

and after a hasty march of two days, in the course of which several of

his attendants died of fatigue, arrived at Viterbo.[37] Most of his

servants, and among the rest Poggio and Leonardo, the latter of whom

narrowly escaped falling a victim to the indiscriminate rage of the

insurgents, were the companions of his flight.[38]

The Roman patriots were now masters of almost every part of the city.

They were however soon dispirited, when they saw their territory laid

waste by the pontifical troops, and agreed to terms of pacification with

Innocent, who returned in triumph to his capital, towards the latter end

of March, 1406.[39] [A. D. 1406.] The pontiff did not long enjoy this

favorable reverse of fortune, as he died on the sixth of November, of the

same year.[40]

When the intelligence of the death of Innocent reached France, the dukes

of Berry, of Burgundy, and of Orleans, who, in the quality of regents,

administered the affairs of that kingdom during the mental indisposition

of Charles VI. repaired to Avignon, and conjuring Benedict XIII. to

concur in putting an end to a schism which had been the source of so

much scandal and calamity, proposed, that he should voluntarily divest

himself of the pontificate. With a view of softening the harshness of

this proposal, they engaged, that whosoever should be elected at Rome

as successor to Innocent, should be obliged to take the same step. The

antichristian competition being thus terminated, it was to be hoped,

they said, that the assembled cardinals would agree in the election

of a pontiff, who would be universally acknowledged as the legitimate

head of the church. Invitations to resign dignity, splendour, and

power, are seldom received with complacence. Benedict made many general

protestations of his zeal for the welfare of the church, but peremptorily

refused to quit the pontifical chair. Fearing that the regents would

attempt to enforce their propositions by arms, he strengthened the

fortifications of Avignon, in which city he was in a manner besieged

for the space of some months. Being at length reduced to extremities,

he embarked on the Rhone, and proceeding down that river to the

Mediterranean, he fled into Spain, where he found a refuge from the power

of his enemies in his native province of Catalonia.[41]

In the mean time, each of the cardinals who happened to be at Rome, at

the time of the death of Innocent VII. took a solemn oath, that if in

the ensuing election of a sovereign pontiff, the choice of the conclave

should happen to fall upon himself, he would resign the pontificate,

provided Benedict would follow his example.

This arrangement was proposed in order to appease the mutual jealousy of

the French and Italian cardinals, as neither of these subdivisions of the

ecclesiastical senate would consent to sacrifice their representative

without the concurrence of their antagonists in a similar measure. These

preliminaries being adjusted, on the 30th of November, the conclave

proceeded to fill the vacant chair, by the election of Angelo Corraro,

cardinal of St. Mark, who on his advancement to the pontifical dignity,

adopted the name of Gregory XII.[42]

Though the new pontiff had, immediately after his election, subscribed a

ratification of the oath which bound him to abdicate his newly acquired

honours, yet upon frivolous pretexts, he from time to time deferred the

fulfilment of this sacred engagement. Benedict his competitor, having

repaired to Savona, and afterwards to Porto Venere, with a view, as he

asserted, of settling the peace of the church, by an amicable conference

with Gregory; the latter insisted upon it, that they should meet in some

inland town, where they might jointly comply with the requisition of the

cardinals. Benedict on the contrary asserting, that he could not deem

himself safe in the interior of Italy, demanded that Gregory should for

that purpose, meet him in some sea-port. With this proposal, Gregory,

on pretence of apprehended danger to his person, refused to comply.

Thus as Leonardo Aretino humorously observes, “The one, like an aquatic

animal, was afraid of trusting himself on dry land; and the other, like

a terrestrial animal, had an equal dread of the water.”[43] Scandalized

by the duplicity of the rival pontiffs, and alarmed by the violence of

Gregory, the cardinals quitted Lucca, to which city they had accompanied

him in hopes that he would adopt the requisite steps to put an end to the

schism, and assembled at Pisa. Here, constituting themselves a council of

the church, they deposed both Gregory and Benedict, substituting in their

place, Pietro Filardo, a native of Candia, who assumed the appellation of

Alexander V.[44]

During these distractions of the Roman court, the officers of the

pontifical household, according to their various views of duty, or

considerations of interest, pursued different plans of conduct. Many of

them, with prudent foresight, deserting the falling fortunes of Gregory,

accompanied the cardinals from Lucca to Pisa; others, in the number of

whom was Leonardo Aretino, adhered to their master.[45] In these delicate

circumstances, Poggio seems to have steered a middle course. He removed

indeed from Lucca, but he exchanged the intrigues and dissensions of

the pontifical palace, for the tranquil delights of friendship which he

enjoyed at Florence in the society of his literary acquaintance.[46]

On this occasion he experienced the most seasonable assistance from

the countenance and support of the celebrated Niccolo Niccoli. This

distinguished patron of literature was the son of Bartolomeo de’ Niccoli,

a merchant of Florence, and was born in the year 1363.[47] His father

wished to have trained him up to the mercantile profession; but Niccolo,

preferring the cultivation of the liberal arts to the accumulation of

riches, entered upon his studies, under the instruction of Lodovico

Marsilio,[48] a scholar of considerable reputation. So ardent was his

love of learning, that when he had attained a competent knowledge

of the Latin language, he went to Padua, for the express purpose of

transcribing the compositions of Petrarca. On his return to Florence, he

brought with him a copy of the _Africa_, and of various other works of

that author. He had hardly attained to the period of manhood, when he

conferred a memorable obligation on the learned, by erecting, at his own

expense, a suitable edifice, for the reception of the library which the

celebrated Bocaccio had by his last will bequeathed to the convent of the

Holy Spirit at Florence. His house was the constant resort of scholars

and students, who were freely indulged with the use of his copious

collection of books, and were moreover incited by his example, to make

the most active exertions in the prosecution of their literary labours.

The patronage of this illustrious citizen, who had the discernment to

distinguish, and the inclination and ability to assist the lovers of

learning, Poggio justly valued at a high rate. And on the other hand,

Niccolo was so much pleased with the accomplishments and the amiable

dispositions of Poggio, that he honoured him with his sincere friendship

and cordial esteem.

Gregory, refusing to acknowledge the legitimacy of the acts of the

council of Pisa, withdrew to Rimini, where he was honourably entertained

by Carlo Malatesta.[49] Benedict was not more obedient to the decree

which announced his deposition. After holding a council at Perpignan,

he defied his foes, and thundered his anathemas from the walls of the

strong Spanish fortress of Paniscola.[50]

The well known virtues of Alexander V. had inspired the friends of the

church with sanguine expectations of witnessing the speedy revival of the

power and dignity of the holy see. But these flattering hopes were at

once dissipated by his death, which took place in the eighth month of his

pontificate.[51] It was strongly suspected that his days were shortened

by poison, administered to him by Baldassare Cossa, cardinal of St.

Eustachio, who succeeded him in his pontifical honours.[52]

At an early period of his life, Baldassare seems to have aspired to

the highest ecclesiastical dignity. When he had finished his studies

at Bologna, he determined to repair to Rome. Being asked by some of

his friends who saw him making preparations for his journey, whither

he was going, he replied, “to the pontificate.” Soon after his arrival

in the capital of the church, he was advanced by Boniface IX. to the

confidential office of private chamberlain; and in the course of a

little time he obtained, from the favour of the same patron, the dignity

of cardinal of St. Eustachio, and was sent, invested with the office

of legate, on an important mission to Bologna. In the exercise of this

office, he greatly contributed, by the exertion of considerable political

and military talents, to the establishment and extension of the authority

of the holy see. It is said, that the power and the money with which this

situation supplied him, were the principal instruments of his exaltation

to the chair of St. Peter. [A. D. 1410.] However that may be, he was

unanimously elected to the sovereign pontificate, on the 19th of May,

1410, and assumed the name of John XXII.[53]

About this time Leonardo Aretino was, by the concurrent voice of the

people, elected to the chancellorship of the city of Florence. He did

not, however, long retain this office, which he found to be attended

with more labour than profit. In the latter end of the ensuing year,

1411, he abdicated his municipal honours, and entered into the service

of John XXII. The return of his friend to the pontifical chancery was

highly gratifying to Poggio, who during the late storms had retained his

situation, and regulating his conduct by the decrees of the council of

Pisa, had acted as apostolic scribe to Alexander V., and was now, in the

same capacity, a member of the household of that pontiff’s successor.

Shortly after the resumption of his functions in the Roman court,

Leonardo took a journey to Arezzo, where he married a young lady of

considerable distinction in that city. The event was of course very

interesting to the colleagues and friends of the bridegroom; and Poggio

wrote to him on the occasion, informing him of the witticisms to which

his present predicament had given rise, and inquiring what opinion his

short experience had led him to form of the comforts of the conjugal

state. Leonardo replied to Poggio’s letter without delay. By the tenor

of his answer, he seems to have found nothing unpleasant in matrimony,

except its costliness. “It is incredible,” says he, “with what expense

these new fashions are attended. In making provision for my wedding

entertainment, I emptied the market, and exhausted the shops of the

perfumers, oilmen, and poulterers. This however is comparatively a

trivial matter; but of the intolerable expense of female dress and

ornaments, there is no end. In short,” says he, “I have in one night

consummated my marriage, and consumed my patrimony.”[54]

Whilst Poggio and his associates were making themselves merry at the

expense of the new married man, the superior officers of the pontifical

court were engaged in very serious deliberations. Sigismund, who had been

elected to the imperial throne, July 21st, 1411, being earnestly desirous

of the extinction of the schism, demanded of John the convocation of

a general council; which the cardinals who had assembled at Pisa in

the year 1409, had declared to be the only measure which could restore

to Christendom the blessings of peace. But the pontiff inherited the

prejudices of his predecessors, against those dangerous assemblies which

were so apt to trench upon the prerogatives of the head of the church. He

would gladly have evaded complying with the requisition of Sigismund, and

with this view proposed that the intended council should be summoned to

meet at Rome. But danger awaited him in his own capital. Ladislaus, king

of Naples, whom he had endeavoured to secure in his interest, invaded

the territory of the church, made himself master of Rome, and compelled

the pontiff successively to seek refuge in Florence, in Bologna, and in

Mantua. From this latter city, John went to Lodi, where he was met by

Sigismund, who, accompanied by a numerous retinue, attended him on his

return to Mantua. Thus finding himself in the power of the emperor, and

flattered by the magnificent promises of that potentate, who professed

his readiness to assist him in expelling the enemies of the church from

the patrimony of St. Peter, John was persuaded to take the desperate step

of summoning a general council, and to appoint the city of Constance as

the place of its meeting.[55]

The life of Poggio Bracciolini · 第 5 / 38 题