INTRODUCTION

This oration of Victor Hugo brings out in

clear contrast a strange contradiction. Our

progress is but an evolution from and at the

same time it is a revolt against the past.

“The thoughts of men are widened by the process of the suns.”

“Yet the mighty dead still rule us from their urns.”

This apparent contradiction exists because the peoples are not as yet

familiar with the law of evolution in social progress. The picture of

a child imprisoned within the ribs of a skeleton is the picture of the

world that many have for want of this conception of time and growth.

They revolt against the order of time, because time is not solid, and

is only visible to the eye of the intellect.

Therefore such revolts have been necessary. They are the great

revolutions and social volcanoes of which Paris has been the favorite

crater in Europe. Hugo’s great soul has seized the lights and shadows

of the great catastrophes of the 18th century, and, their meaning

visible to mankind forever in his wonderful oration.

It is a warning, a consecration, and a hope. It tells that progress is

the only condition of human safety. It consecrates the noble Voltaire

who made its conditions possible. It is a prophecy of hope and peace in

evolution under the light of knowledge and love. It is the inspiration

of every liberated soul to realize this aspiration for “peace on

earth and good will to men,” which rises immeasurably higher than any

Christian myth ever dreamed.

The magnificent word painting of this oration and its inspiration is

one of the highest points humanity has ever reached. We are at a loss

to find anything superior to it. Compare with it the great orations of

Pericles, Demosthenes, Cicero, Chatham, Mirabeau, Henry, Webster, or

the consecration of the dead at Gettysburg of Abraham Lincoln, and you

will feel that those mighty voices were limited by local and temporary

interests and feelings.

Hugo has spoken for all the races of earth and for all time. He has

realized to the heart and eye humanity’s heaven of progress sustained

by all of the powers of the good in the human soul. To those who

can but catch a glimpse of its mighty meaning it will be a treasure

forever. No one can read and understand it and be the same person he

was before.

Hugo, the greatest French poet of his century, perhaps the greatest

French poet of all time, was a fervent Theist, reverencing the prophet

of Nazareth as a man, and holding that “the divine tear” of Jesus and

“the human smile” of Voltaire “compose the sweetness of the present

civilization.” But he was perfectly free from the trammels of creeds,

and he hated priestcraft, like despotism, with a perfect hatred. In

one of his striking later poems, _Religien et les Religions_, he

derides and denounces the tenets and pretensions of Christianity. The

Devil, he says to the clergy, is only the monkey of superstition; your

Hell is an outrage on Humanity and a blasphemy against God; and when

you tell me that your deity made you in his own image, I reply that he

must be very ugly.

As a man, as well as a writer, there was something magnificently

grandiose about him. Subtract him from the nineteenth century, and you

rob it of much of its glory. For nineteen years on a lonely channel

island, an exile from the land of his birth and his love, he nursed

the conscience of humanity within his mighty heart, brandishing the

lightnings and thunders of chastisement over the heads of the political

brigands who were stifling a nation, and prophesying their certain

doom. When it came, after Sedan, he returned to Paris, and for fifteen

years he was idolised by its people. There was great mourning at his

death, and “all Paris” attended his funeral. But true to the simplicity

of his life he ordered that his body should lie in a common coffin,

which contrasted vividly with the splendid procession. France buried

him, as she did Gambetta; he was laid to rest in the Church of St.

Genevieve, re-secularized as the pantheon for the occasion; and the

interment took place without any religious rites.

Hugo’s great oration on Voltaire, in 1878, roused the ire of the Bishop

of Orleans, who reprimanded him in a public letter. The free-thinking

poet sent a crushing reply:

“France had to pass an ordeal. France was free. A man traitorously

seized her in the night, threw her down and garrotted her. If a

people could be killed, that man had slain France. He made her dead

enough for him to reign over her. He began his reign, since it was

a reign, with perjury, lying in wait, and massacre. He continued

it by oppression, by tyranny, by despotism, by an unspeakable

parody of religion and justice. He was monstrous and little. The

Deum Magnificat, Salvum fac, Gloria tibi, were sung for him. Who

sang them? Ask yourself. The law delivered the people up to him.

The church delivered God up to him. Under that man sank down right,

honor, country; he had beneath his feet oath, equity, probity, the

glory of the flag, the dignity of men, the liberty of citizens. That

man’s prosperity disconcerted the human conscience. It lasted nineteen

years. During that time you were in a palace. I was in exile. I pity

you, sir.”

Despite this terrible rebuff to Bishop Dupanloup, another priest,

Cardinal Guibert, Archbishop of Paris, had the temerity and bad taste

to obtrude himself when Victor Hugo lay dying in 1885. Being born on

February 25, 1802, the poet was in his eighty-fourth year, and expiring

naturally of old age. Had the rites of the Church been performed on him

in such circumstances, it would have been an insufferable farce. Yet

the Archbishop wrote to Madame Lockroy, offering to bring personally

“the succor and consolation so much needed in these cruel ordeals.”

Monsieur Lockroy at once replied as follows:

“Madame Lockroy, who cannot leave the bedside of her father-in-law,

begs me to thank you for the sentiments which you have expressed with

so much eloquence and kindness. As regards M. Victor Hugo, he has

again said within the last few days, that he had no wish during his

illness to be attended by a priest of any persuasion. We should be

wanting in our duty if we did not respect his resolution.”

Oration on Voltaire · 第 7 / 16 题