The answer is a description of his personal perfections:--

"My beloved is white and ruddy,

* * * * *

His locks are bushy, and black as a raven.

His eyes are like doves beside the water brooks.

* * * * *

His aspect is like Lebanon, excellent as the cedars,

His mouth is most sweet: yea, he is altogether lovely.

This is my beloved, and this is my friend,

O daughters of Jerusalem."

Do you think that the daughters of Jerusalem would be so tactless as to

reply that they had seen a number of handsome youths with bushy black

hair and languishing eyes and fine forms, and that they represented an

admirable type of manly beauty? That would be to confess that they had

not seen the beloved, for he was unlike all others. "My beloved is

marked out with a banner among ten thousand."

The knowledge that is required is not contained in a catalogue of the

points in which he resembles the nine thousand nine hundred and

ninety-nine; it is a recognition of the incommunicable grace that is his

own.

Even in ordinary social intercourse the most delicate compliment is to

treat the person with whom you are talking as an exception to all rules.

That he is a clergyman or a commercial traveler tells you nothing of his

inner life. That is left for him to reveal, if it so pleases him. Even a

king grows tired of being addressed in terms appropriate to royalty. It

is a relief to travel incognito, and he is flattered when he is assured

that no one suspects his station in life. It makes him feel that he is

not like the ordinary run of kings.

No one likes to be pigeon-holed or reduced to a formula. We resent being

classed as old or middle-aged or young. Why should we be confounded with

our coevals? We may not be any better than they are; but we are

different. Nor is it pleasant to have our opinions treated as if they

were the necessary product of social forces. There is something

offensive in the curiosity of those who are all the time asking how we

came by our ideas. What if they do bear a general resemblance to those

of the honest people who belong to our party and who read the same

newspaper. We do not care to be reminded of these chance coincidences.

Because one has found it convenient and economical to buy a ready-made

suit of clothing, it does not follow that he is willing to wear the tag

which contains the statement of the price and size. These labels were

very useful so long as the garment was kept in stock by the dealer, but

the information that they convey is now irrelevant.

This sensitiveness in regard to personal identity is strangely lacking

in many modern students of literature. They treat the man of genius as a

phenomenon, to be explained by other phenomena and used to illustrate a

general law. They love to deal in averages and aggregates. They describe

minutely the period to which a writer belongs, its currents of thought,

its intellectual limitations, and its generally received notions. With a

knowledge of antecedent conditions there is the expectancy of a certain

type of man as the result. Our minds are prepared for some one who

resembles the composite photograph which is first presented to us. We

are, for example, given an elaborate account of the Puritan movement in

England. We form a conception of what the Puritan was, and then we are

introduced to Milton. Our preconceptions stand in the way of personal

sympathy.

The method of the Gentle Reader is more direct. He is fortunate enough

to have read Milton before he has read much about him, and he returns to

the reading with ever fresh delight. He does not think of him as

belonging to a past age. He is a perpetual contemporary. The seventeenth

century gave color to his words, but it did not limit his genius.

Seventeenth century Independency might be, as a general thing, lacking

in grace, but when we turn away from Praise-God-Barebones to John Milton

we find it transformed into a--

"divine philosophy,

Not harsh and crabbed as dull fools suppose,

But musical as is Apollo's lute,

And a perpetual feast of nectared sweets."

Into its austere beauty, into its wide free spaces, into its sensuous

charms, no one but Milton can conduct us. We must follow not as those

who know beforehand what is to be seen or heard, but as those who are

welcomed by a generous householder who brings out of his treasures

things new and old.

The Gentle Reader · 第 52 / 56 题