CASE II.

Mr. H----, a publican, aged about 48 years, sent for me in _March_,

1778. He complained of a cough, shortness of breathing, which

prevented him from laying down in bed; his belly, thighs and legs very

much distended with water; the quantity of urine made at a time seldom

exceeded a spoonful. I requested him to get some of the Digitalis, and

as they had no proper weights in the house, I told them to put as much

of the fresh leaves as would weigh down a guinea, into half a pint of

boiling water; to let it stand till cold, then to pour off the clear

liquor, and add a glass of gin to it, and to take three table

spoonfuls every third hour, until it had some sensible effect upon

him.

Before he had taken all the infusion, the quantity of urine made

increased, (he therefore left off taking it), and it continued to do

so until all the water was evacuated. His breathing became much

better, his cough abated, though it never quite left him; he being for

some time before asthmatic. By taking some tonic pills he continued

quite well until the next spring, when he had a return of his

complaint, which was carried off by the same means. Two years after,

he had a third attack, and this also gave way to the medicine. Last

year he died of a pleurisy.

I am, &c.

JER. VAUX

Moor-Street, 8th May,

1785.

P. S. You must well recollect the case of Mrs. F----.--It was "a

general dropsy--every time she took the medicine its effects were

similar, viz. The discharge of urine came on gradually at first,

increased afterwards, and the whole of the water both in the belly,

legs, &c. was perfectly evacuated. Although the effects were only

temporary, they were exceedingly agreeable to the patient, making her

time much more comfortable."--(_See Case_ XLIII.)

A Letter from Mr. WAINWRIGHT,

Surgeon, in Dudley.

Dear SIR,

It gives me great pleasure to find you intend to publish your

observations on the Digitalis purpurea.

Several years are now elapsed since you communicated to me the high

opinion you entertained of the diuretic qualities of this noble plant.

To ensure success, due attention was recommended to its _preparation_,

its _dose_, and its _effects_ upon the system.

I always gave the infusion of the dried leaves; the dose the same as

in the prescriptions returned. If the medicine operated on the stomach

or bowels, it was thought prudent to forbear. When the kidneys began

to perform their proper functions, and the urine to be discharged, a

continuance of its farther use was unnecessary.

These remarks you made in the case of the first patient for whom you

prescribed the Digitalis in our neighbourhood, and I have found them

all necessary at this present period. From the _decided_ good effects

that followed from its use, in those cases where the most powerful

remedies had failed, I was soon convinced it was a most valuable

addition to the materia medica.

The want of a certain diuretic, has long been one of the desiderata of

medicine. The Digitalis is undoubtedly at the head of that class, and

will seldom, if properly administered, disappoint the expectation. I

can speak with the more confidence, having, in an extensive practice,

been a happy witness to its good qualities.

For several years, I have given the infusion in a variety of cases,

where there was a deficiency in the secretion of the urine, with the

greatest success. In recent obstructions, I do not recollect many

failures. In anasarcous diseases, and in the anasarca, when combined

with the ascites; in swellings of the limbs, and in diseases of the

chest, when there was the greatest reason to believe an accumulation

of serum, the most beneficial consequences have followed from its use.

Had I been earlier acquainted with your intention to publish an

account of the Digitalis, I could have transmitted some cases, which

might have served to corroborate these assertions: but I am convinced

the Digitalis needs not my assistance to procure a favorable

reception. Its own merit will ensure success, more than a hundred

recited cases.

I could wish those gentlemen who intend to make use of this plant, to

collect it in a hot dry day, when the petals fall, and the

seed-vessels begin to swell.

The leaves kept to the second year are weaker, and their diuretic

qualities much diminished. It will therefore be necessary to gather

the plant fresh every season.

These cautions are unnecessary to the accurate botanist, who well

knows, that a plant in the spring, though more succulent and full of

juices, is destitute of those qualities which may be expected when

that plant has attained its full vigour, and the seed-vessels begin to

be manifest. But for want of attention to these particulars, its

virtues may be thought exaggerated, or doubtful, if beneficial

consequences do not always flow from its use. There are diseases it

cannot cure; and in several of those patients in this town, who first

took the Digitalis by your orders, there was the most positive proof

of the viscera being unsound. In these desperate cases it often

procured a plentiful flow of urine, and palliated a disease which

medicine could not remove.

At a remote distance, physicians are seldom applied to for advice in

trifling disorders. Many remedies have been tried without relief, and

the disease is generally obstinate or confirmed.--It would not be fair

to try the merits of the Digitalis in this scale. It might often fail

of promoting the end desired. I flatter myself the reputation of this

plant will be equal to its merit, and that it will meet with a candid

reception.

As there is no pleasure equal to relieving the miseries and distresses

of our fellow-creatures, I hope you will long enjoy that peculiar

felicity.

Permit me to return my thankful acknowledgments, for your free

communication of a medicine, by which means, through the blessing of

providence, I have been enabled to restore health and happiness to

many miserable objects.

I am, &c.

Yours,

J. WAINWRIGHT.

Dudley, April 26th,

1785.

CASE of Mr. WARD, Surgeon, in

Birmingham.--Related by himself.

In _September_, 1782, I was seized with a difficulty of breathing, and

oppression in my chest, in consequence of taking cold from being

called out in the night. My tongue was foul; my urine small in

quantity; my breath laborious and distressing on the slightest

exercise. I tried the medicines most generally recommended, such as

emetics, blisters, lac ammoniacum, oxymel of squills, &c. but finding

little or no relief, I consulted Dr. Withering, who advised me to try

the following prescription.

R. Fol. Digital. purp. siccat. [Symbol: dram]iss.

Aq. bullientis [Symbol: ounce]iv.

Aq. cinn. sp. [Symbol: ounce]ss. digere per horas quatuor, et colaturae

capiat cochlear. i. nocte maneque.

He also desired me to take fifty drops of tincture of cantharides

three or four times a day.

After taking eight ounces of the infusion, and about twelve drams of

the drops, I was perfectly cured, and have had no return since. The

medicine did not occasion sickness or vertigo, nor had they any other

sensible effect than in changing the appearance, and increasing the

quantity of the urine, and rendering the tongue clean. After the last

dose or two indeed, I had a little nausea, which was immediately

removed by a small glass of brandy.

Birmingham, 1st July, 1785.

Communications from Mr. YONGE,

Surgeon, in Shiffnall, Shropshire.

Dear SIR,

I have great satisfaction in complying with your just claim, by

transcribing outlines of the subsequent cases, for insertion in your

long requested tract on the Digitalis purpurea. The two first of these

you will easily recollect, the cures having been conducted immediately

under your own management, and the whole may add to that weight of

evidence which long experience enables you to adduce of the efficacy

of that valuable medicine. I have recited the only instances of its

failure which occur to me, but many other, though successful cases,

wherein its utility might seem dubious, and also the accounts received

from people whose accuracy might be suspected, I shall not for obvious

reasons trouble you with.

I am, dear Sir,

Your obliged friend,

WILLIAM YONGE.

Shiffnall,

_May_ 1, 1785.

An Account of the Foxglove and some of its Medical Uses With Practical Remarks on Dropsy and Other Diseases · 第 222 / 251 题