With regard to "Separatism," I believe this--and I think in so saying I

am echoing the sentiments of most of my fellow-countrymen, that the only

way to liberate Ireland is to dominate England, not physically, for this

would be as useless as it would be impossible, but mentally and morally.

If the Irishman has been persecuted and tyrannized over, it is in virtue

of certain ideals and principles which are ethically and economically

inferior to his, and which he has consequently to crush in the very

source, as much for his own sake as for those other members of the

Empire to which, if it has been a misfortune to belong in the past, it

may be an advantage and an honour to belong to-morrow.

If Castle government is wrong in Dublin it is wrong elsewhere; if

militarism was wrong and foolish and futile in Cromwell's day, it is

wrong to-day, to-morrow, and for all time; if England really intends at

the great Peace Congress to come forward as the champion of small

nations, she must be able to show an Ireland prosperous, contented, and

freely allied to her without the aid of a single soldier or a single

threat.

Such at least is the hope of all those who believe that only when we

have solved the Irish problem have we solved the problem of Empire.

Primarily, however, the task is in Ireland's own hands: for England at

this moment stands not unwilling or hostile so much as perplexed and

bewildered at the strange eruption that has taken place, and which must

be taken rather as an indication of a chronic state than the expression

of any concrete or definite complaint.

In other words, there is already a new nationalism in the making, more

idealistic, more spiritual, more constructive, and more comprehensive

than the old nationalism, which was to a large extent geographical,

material, and traditional to an almost stifling degree: the eyes of the

younger men are fixed on the future, those of the older men are fixed

upon the past.

The older generation will probably die immutable in mind, like veterans,

nor will they ever try to mingle, but on all sides and in every sphere

the younger generation has already shaken hands.

The spirit of the two is the same, the aspirations just as intense, but

their methods are different: geographical isolation is against natural

evolution and "Separatism" an economic, racial, and military

impossibility--this last rebellion has exploded the myth; but all this

will only have the effect of changing the ever-living consciousness of

nationality into different channels.

Instead of being expansive, our patriotism will tend to be more

intensive: our combat with England will no longer be with arms, but with

thoughts and ideas, and the nobler and the truer will win; and it is in

this contest that "Sinn Fein" will come forward with new force of the

"living dead." If Ireland cannot be the strongest nation, she can be the

freest; if she cannot be the greatest, she can be the purest; if she

cannot be the richest, she can be the happiest and the kindliest: and as

Greece conquered ancient Rome, so may Ireland some day conquer England,

if those ideals which were bred and nurtured within her bosom can be

made to dominate the inferior Saxon till they spread throughout the

world; and that is why, whatever happens, Ireland must keep her

"nationality" free by whatever means lie at her hands, and that was the

root cause of the revolt, if we are to believe the words of the men who

suffered.

"Others have been struck before now," said Pearse in the course of an

address which he delivered in October 1897 to a young men's literary

society, "by the fact that hundreds of noble men and true have fought

and bled for the emancipation of the Gaelic race, and yet have all

failed. Surely, if ever cause was worthy of success, it was the cause

for which Laurence prayed, for which Hugh of Dungannon planned, for

which Hugh Roe and Owen Roe fought, for which Wolfe Tone and Lord Edward

and Robert Emmet gave their lives, for which Grattan pleaded, for which

Moore and Davis sang, for which O'Connell wore himself out with toil.

Yet these men prayed and planned, and fought and bled, and pleaded and

wrote and toiled in vain. May it not be that there is some reason for

this? May it not be that the ends they struggled for were ends never

intended for the Gael?... The Gael is not like other men; the spade and

the loom and the sword are not for him. But a destiny more glorious than

that of Rome, more glorious than that of Britain, awaits him: to become

the saviour of idealism in modern intellectual and social life, the

regenerator and rejuvenator of the literature of the world, the

instructor of the nations, the preacher of the gospel of nature-worship,

hero-worship, God-worship--such is the destiny of the Gael."

The Gresham Press

UNWIN BROTHERS, LIMITED

WOKING AND LONDON

Six days of the Irish Republic A Narrative and Critical Account of the Latest Phase of Irish Politics · 第 11 / 11 段