The central poem of this epoch is "Questions of Life."

"I am: how little more I know!

Whence came I? Whither do I go?

A centred self, which feels and is;

_A cry between the silences;_

A shadow-birth of clouds at strife

With sunshine on the hills of life;

A shaft from Nature's quiver cast

Into the Future from the Past;

Between the cradle and the shroud

A meteor's flight from cloud to cloud."

Then to outward Nature, to mythic tradition, to the thought, faith,

sanctity of old time he goes in quest of certitude, but returns to God

in the heart, and to the simple heroic act by which he that believes

BELIEVES.

"To Him, from wanderings long and wild,

I come, an over-wearied child,

In cool and shade His peace to find,

Like dew-fall settling on the mind.

Assured that all I know is best,

And humbly trusting for the rest,

I turn....

From Nature and her mockery, Art,

And book and speech of men apart,

To the still witness in my heart;

With reverence waiting to behold

His Avatar of love unfold,

The Eternal Beauty new and old!"

"The Panorama and other Poems," together with "Later Poems,"[13] having

the dates of 1856 and 1857, constitute the transition to his third and

consummate epoch. Much in them deserves notice, but we must hasten. And

yet, instead of hastening, we will pause, and take this opportunity to

pick a small critical quarrel with Mr. Whittier. We charge him, in the

first place, with sundry felonious assaults upon the good letter _r_. In

the "Panorama," for example, we find _law_ rhyming with _for_! You, Mr.

Poet, you, who indulge fastidious objections to the whipping of women,

to outrage that innocent preposition thus! And to select the word _law_

itself, with which to force it into this lawless connection! Secondly,

_romance_ and _allies_ are constantly written by him with the accent on

the first syllable. These be heinous offences! A poet, of all men,

should cherish the liquid consonants, and should resist the tendency of

the populace to make trochees of all dissyllables. In a graver tone we

might complain that he sometimes--rarely--writes, not by vocation of the

ancient Muses, who were daughters of Memory and immortal Zeus, but of

those Muses in drab and scoop-bonnets who are daughters of Memory and

George Fox. Some lines of the "Brown of Ossawatomie" we are thinking of

now. We can regard them only as a reminiscence of his special Quaker

culture.

With the "Home Ballads," published in 1863, dawns fully his final

period,--long may it last! This is the epoch of Poetic Realism. Not that

he abandons or falls away from his moral ideal. The fact is quite

contrary. He has so entirely established himself in that ideal that he

no longer needs strivingly to assert it,--any more than Nature needs to

pin upon oak-trees an affirmation that the idea of an oak dwells in her

formative thought. Nature affirms the oak-idea by oaks; the consummate

poet exhibits the same realism. He embodies. He lends a soul to forms.

The real and ideal in Art are indeed often opposed to each other as

contraries, but it is a false opposition. Let the artist represent

reality, and all that is in him, though it were the faith of seraphs,

will go into the representation. The sole condition is that he shall

_select his subject from native, spontaneous choice_,--that is, leave

his genius to make its own elections. Let one, whose genius so invites

him, paint but a thistle, and paint it as faithfully as Nature grows it;

yet, if the Ten Commandments are meantime uttering themselves in his

thought, he will make the thistle-top a Sinai.

It is this poetic realism that Whittier has now, in a high

degree, attained. Calm and sure, lofty in humility, strong in

childlikeness,--renewing the play-instinct of the true poet in his

heart,--younger now than when he sat on his mother's knee,--chastened,

not darkened, by trial, and toil, and time,--illumined, poet-like, even

by sorrow,--he lives and loves, and chants the deep, homely beauty of

his lays. He is as genuine, as wholesome and real as sweet-flag and

clover. Even when he utters pure sentiment, as in that perfect lyric,

"My Psalm," or in the intrepid, exquisite humility--healthful and sound

as the odor of new-mown hay or balsam-firs--of "Andrew Rykman's Prayer,"

he maintains the same attitude of realism. He states God and inward

experience as he would state sunshine and the growth of grass. This,

with the devout depth of his nature, makes the rare beauty of his hymns

and poems of piety and trust. He does not try to _make_ the facts by

stating them; he does not try to embellish them; he only seeks to utter,

to state them; and even in his most perfect verse they are not half so

melodious as they were in his soul.

All perfect poetry is simple statement of facts,--facts of history or of

imagination. Whoever thinks to create poetry by words, and inclose in

the verse a beauty which did not exist in his consciousness, has got

hopelessly astray.

This attitude of simple divine abiding in the present is beautifully

expressed in the opening stanzas of "My Psalm."

"I mourn no more my vanished years:

Beneath a tender rain,

An April rain of smiles and tears,

My heart is young again.

"The west winds blow, and, singing low,

I hear the glad streams run;

The windows of my soul I throw

Wide open to the sun.

"No longer forward nor behind

I look in hope and fear;

But, grateful, take the good I find,

The best of now and here.

"I plough no more a desert land,

To harvest weed and tare;

The manna dropping from God's hand

Rebukes my painful care.

"I break my pilgrim-staff, I lay

Aside the toiling oar;

The angel sought so far away

I welcome at the door."

It is, however, in his ballads that Whittier exhibits, not, perhaps, a

higher, yet a rarer, power than elsewhere,--a power, in truth, which is

very rare indeed. Already in the "Panorama" volume he had brought forth

three of these,--all good, and the tender pathos of that fine ballad of

sentiment, "Maud Muller," went to the heart of the nation. In how many

an imagination does the innocent maiden, with her delicate brown ankles,

"Rake the meadow sweet with hay,"

and

"The judge ride slowly down the lane"!

But though sentiment so simple and unconscious is rare, our poet has yet

better in store for us. He has developed of late years the precious

power of creating _homely beauty_,[14]--one of the rarest powers shown

in modern literature. Homely life-scenes, homely old sanctities and

heroisms, he takes up, delineates them with intrepid fidelity to their

homeliness, and, lo! there they are, beautiful as Indian corn, or as

ploughed land under an October sun! He has thus opened an inexhaustible

mine right here under our New-England feet. What will come of it no one

knows.

These poems of his are natural growths; they have their own circulation

of vital juices, their own peculiar properties; they smack of the soil,

are racy and strong and aromatic, like ground-juniper, sweet-fern, and

the _arbor vitæ_. Set them out in the earth, and would they not sprout

and grow?--nor would need vine-shields to shelter them from the weather!

They are living and local, and lean toward the west from the pressure of

east winds that blow on our coast. "Skipper Ireson's Ride,"--can any one

tell what makes that poetry? This uncertainty is the highest praise.

This power of telling a plain matter in a plain way, and leaving it

there a symbol and harmony forever,--it is the power of Nature herself.

And again we repeat, that almost anything may be found in literature

more frequently than this pure creative simplicity. As a special

instance of it, take three lines which occur in an exquisite picture of

natural scenery,--and which we quote the more readily as it affords

opportunity for saying that Whittier's landscape-pictures alone make his

books worthy of study,--not so much those which he sets himself

deliberately to draw as those that are incidental to some other purpose

or effect.

"I see far southward, this quiet day,

The hills of Newbury rolling away,

With the many tints of the season gay,

Dreamily blending in autumn mist

Crimson and gold and amethyst.

Long and low, with dwarf trees crowned,

Plum Island lies, like a whale aground,

A stone's toss over the narrow sound.

Inland, as far as the eye can go,

The hills curve round, like a bended bow;

A silver arrow from out them sprung,

I see the shine of the Quasycung;

_And, round and round, over valley and hill,

Old roads winding, as old roads will,

Here to a ferry, and there to a mill._"

Can any one tell what magic it is that is in these concluding lines, so

that they even eclipse the rhetorical brilliancy of those immediately

preceding?

Our deep-hearted poet has fairly arrived at his poetic youth. Never was

he so strong, so ruddy and rich as to-day. Time has treated him as,

according to Swedenborg, she does the angels,--chastened indeed, but

vivified. Let him hold steadily to his true vocation as a poet, and

never fear to be thought idle, or untrue to his land. To give

imaginative and ideal depth to the life of the people,--what truer

service than that? And as for war-time,--does he know that "Barbara

Frietche" is the true sequel to the Battle of Gettysburg, is that other

victory which the nation _asked_ of Meade the soldier and obtained from

Whittier the poet?

The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 13, No. 77, March, 1864 A Magazine of Literature, Art, and Politics · 第 31 / 50 题