II

However, as matters actually stand at present, it is your good fortune to

have a wide range of occupations among which to choose.

It is no light matter to make the choice. It is to elect your physical and

social environment. It is to choose where you will work--in a scholar's

cloister, on a farm, or in the cliffs of a city street. It is to choose

your comrades and rivals. It is to choose what you will attend to, what you

will try for, whom you will follow. In a word, it is to elect for life, for

better or worse, some one part of the whole social heritage. These

influences will not touch you lightly. They will compass you with subtle

compulsions. They will fashion your clothes and looks and carriage, the

cunning of your hands, the texture of your speech, and the temper of your

will. And if you are wholly willing and wholly fit, they can work upon you

this miracle: they can carry you swiftly in the course of your single life

to levels of wisdom and skill in one sort, which it has cost the whole

history of your guild to win.

But there is, of course, no magic in merely choosing an occupation. If you

do nothing to an occupation but choose it, it can do nothing at all to you.

If you are an incorrigible lover of holidays, so that the arrival of a

working-day makes you sick, if every task thrust into your hands grows

intolerable, if every calling, as soon as you have touched its drudgery,

grows hateful--that is to have the soul of a tramp. It is to be stricken

with incurable poverty. You turn your back upon every company of men where

anything worth while is to be done. You shut out of yourself every wisdom

and skill which civilized work develops in a man. And you grow not empty

but full, choked with evil life. Wretched are they that hunger and thirst

after nothing good, for they also shall be filled. Herein is democracy,

that whether you are a beggar's son or the son of Croesus you cannot escape

from yourself--you cannot bribe or frighten yourself into being anything

else than what your own hungers and thirsts have made you.

It is somewhat better but far from well enough if you enter many

occupations, but stay in none long enough to receive thorough

apprenticeship.

It is so ordered that it is easy for most of us to make a fair beginning at

almost anything. In the rough and tumble of babyhood and youth we all

accumulate experiences which are raw material for any and every occupation.

So when one of them kindles in you a light blaze of curiosity, you have

only to pull yourself together, you have only to mobilize your forces, and

you are presently enjoying little successes that surprise and delight you

and that may give you the illusion of mastery.

Doubtless the World Soul knows his own affairs in ordering this so. For one

thing, the easy initial victories are fine baits, lures, by which youths

are caught and drawn into serious apprenticeship. For another thing, the

influence of each occupation upon society in general must be exercised

largely through men who carry some intelligence of it into other

occupations.

But if a man flits from one curiosity to another, if for fear of being

narrow and with the hope of being broad, he forsakes every occupation

before it can set its seal upon him, if he is through and through

dilettante, jack-of-all-trades, he is a man only less poverty-stricken than

a tramp. He has the illusion of efficiency. He wonders that society

generally judges that he is not worth his salt, that on every battlefield

Hotspur curses him for a popinjay, that in every company of master workmen

met for council he is at most a tolerated guest. The judgment upon him--not

my judgment, but the judgment which the days thrust in his face--is this:

that when there is important work to be done he cannot do it. He is full of

versatility. He knows the alphabet of everything--chemistry, engineering,

business, law, what not. But with all these he cannot bridge the

Mississippi. He cannot make the steel for the bridge, nor calculate the

strength of it, nor find the money to build it, nor defend its interests in

court. These tasks fall to men whom twenty years' service in their several

callings have taught to speak for society at its best. And while their work

goes on its way, the brilliant man who refused every sort of thorough

training which society could give him, can only stand full of wonder and

anger that with all his versatilities he is left to choose between the

drudgery of unskilled labor and mere starvation.

There is another sort of man who will learn little in any occupation

because he is wholly bent upon being original. The past is all wrong, full

of errors, absurdities, iniquities. To serve apprenticeship is to

indoctrinate one's self with pernicious orthodoxies. We must rebel. We must

begin at the beginning. We must do something entirely new and

revolutionary. We must rely upon our free souls to see and to do the right,

as it has never been seen or done before. Some such declaration of

independence, some such combination of hopeless pessimism about all that

has been done, with confident optimism about what is just to be done, one

finds in men of every art, craft, and calling. We are to have perpetual

motion. We are to square the circle. We are to abandon our present

political and religious and educational institutions and get new and

perfect ones. Above all, the children must grow up free from the whole

array of social orthodoxies. We are to escape from the whole wretched

blundering past and by one bold march enter a new Garden of Eden.

There is something inspiring in this, something that stirs the youth like a

bugle, and something, as I believe, that is essential in every generation

for the purification of society. The past is as bad as anybody says it is,

woven full of inconsistency and iniquity. We _must_ escape it. We _must_

fight it. And it is no doubt inevitable that there should be some who think

that they owe it nothing but war.

And yet, for my part, I am convinced that this is a fatally one-sided view

of things. Is there in existence one great work of any sort which owes

nothing to the historic guild which does that sort of work? Is there one

great man in history who gave to the future without getting anything from

the past? The bare scientific fact is that no man escapes the tuition of

society. The crank does not escape. The freak does not escape. They miss

the highest traditions of society only to become victims of lower

traditions. Whether such a man have genius or the illusion of genius, it is

his tragic fate to have the best that he can do lie far below the best that

society already possesses.

If one will see what genius without adequate instruction comes to, let him

look at the case of the mathematical prodigy, Arthur Griffith. There is

what no one would refuse to call genius. There is originality, spontaneity,

insatiable interest, unceasing labor. And the result? A marvelous skill for

which society has almost no use, and a knowledge of the science of

arithmetic which is two hundred years behind that of the high school

graduate.

Modern American Prose Selections · 第 26 / 51 题