PLATE 26.

P. H. GOSSE, _del._ LEIGHTON, BROS.

NUT-CRAB. ANGLED-CRAB.

]

The general colour is a light salmon-red, often with the hinder half

of the carapace, and the inner sides of the limbs, of a pale buff. The

eyes (not the stalks) and the movable finger of each hand, which is

slender and elegantly curved, are polished black.

Not uncommon with us, it is not very often seen even by the naturalist,

as it seems to be properly an inhabitant of deep water. Occasionally

it is washed ashore on the beach by a heavy sea; but this is

accidental. Montagu first ascertained it to be British by finding

it at Kingsbridge, near Plymouth. Mr. Couch finds it common on

the Cornwall coast, together with an allied, but certainly distinct,

species, the _G. rhomboides_ of the Mediterranean, to be identified

by its lacking a second spine behind each angular one, which is well

marked in our species. Though essentially a southern form, it occurs

on the Dublin coast, and that in sufficient number to have obtained a

popular appellation,--that of “Coffin-crab;” the term “coffin” being

possibly a word of the Irish tongue, meaning something very different

from that which it suggests to our ears.

Cranch records, as a curious habit of the species, that “they live in

excavations formed in the hardened mud, and that their habitations,

at the extremities of which they live, are open at both ends.” This

description implies a habitat above low water, if not above tide-marks;

for where else could “hardened mud” be found? or if it were found in

the deep water, how could it come under the observer’s cognizance?

However, I know that many marine creatures are littoral in some

localities, which are exclusively deep-water subjects in others.

Several observant naturalists have noticed the frequency with which

the species is obtained from the stomachs of the larger ground-feeding

fishes,--the cod especially. Mr. Ball has taken four at a time from

a single cod in Youghal shambles. This is a well-known source for

procuring rare specimens of the inhabitants of the deep, particularly

Crustacea and the shelled Mollusca; for the fishes are expert and

persevering and successful collectors of natural history, and are

continually picking up objects for which the naturalist would almost

give one of his eyes. Mr. Gordon of Elgin, some years ago, gave a

long list of Crustacea, many of them of great rarity, which he had

procured from stomachs of cod-fish, “through the agency of Widow Scott

and her son John, of the fishing village of Stotfield,” on the Moray

Firth. His remarks are suggestive, not only to those residing on the

coast, but to the denizens of inland towns. “By a small douceur to the

fisherman’s family, and by the assistance of the fish-curer on the

coast, the fishmonger of the large town, or of some acquaintance in

the fishing village, it is believed that almost any number of these

now useless receptacles [viz., cod-stomachs], could be obtained. It

may excite at first a little nausea to open up and examine these

omnivorous reservoirs, but this will soon pass off; and were it of

longer continuance than it is, the stores to be unfolded would amply

compensate for all the disagreeable feeling that may for a time

arise. It is not only the crustacean that is thus gathered from the

inaccessible depths of the ocean, but often the rare shell, with its

still rarer inhabitant. The radiated animal and the curious zoophyte

will also be found congregated together there; all of them, no doubt,

at times mutilated or partly digested, but not unfrequently fresh and

complete, as if newly past the voracious jaws.”

A year at the shore · 第 202 / 292 题