VENOM OF ITS SPINES.

Cuvier considers the imputation of venom to the wounds made by the

Weever as a popular error. He says, “They cannot inject into the wounds

they inflict with their spines any poisonous substance, properly so

called; but, as these spines are very strong and sharp-pointed, and can

no doubt pierce the flesh to a considerable depth, these wounds, like

all others of the same description, may produce dangerous consequences

if care is not taken to enlarge them, and to allow the blood to flow;

this perhaps, is the most certain, as the simplest remedy, and much

preferable to the boasted applications of the ancients.”

This is oracular; but it does not appear that the decision of the great

French anatomist was grounded on any definite experiments. Mr. Couch,

on the other hand, has known three men wounded successively in the hand

by the same fish (the Greater Weever), and the consequences have been

felt in a few minutes as high as the shoulder. It is certain that the

spinous bristles of certain caterpillars have the power of inflicting

envenomed wounds, which in some cases even prove fatal, notwithstanding

the minuteness of the organs, and evidence appears very strong for the

injection of some highly irritant poison by means of these prickles of

the Weevers.

The flesh of these fishes is esteemed for the table; but such is the

general apprehension of danger attendant upon touching them, heightened

also by their great tenacity of life, that the fishermen usually cut

off the first dorsal and the gill-spines as soon as they capture them;

while in Spain and France these precautions are enforced by legal

penalties, on such fishes being exposed in the market without having

been disarmed.[59]

According to Mr. Couch smart friction of the wounded part with

olive-oil is the most effectual remedy; and this fact again suggests

analogy of the evil with the effects produced by the bites of venomous

snakes and the stings of insects.[60]

Our little fish is not uncomely in its form or the distribution

of its sober colours. The upper parts are light olive, with lines

of ill-defined reddish spots running lengthwise; the sides are

silver-grey, tenderly washed with blue; the under parts pearly white:

the cheeks and operculum are richly adorned with pearly reflections;

these parts are destitute of scales, which is the chief distinction

between this species and the Greater Weever, after the size; this

species rarely exceeding five or six inches in length, whereas its

congener attains double those dimensions, and even more.

A year at the shore · 第 129 / 292 题