HYPOTHESES OF THEIR FORMATION.

Strange as it seems, these animals have bored these holes in the stone;

and they are capable of boring in far harder rock than this; even in

compact limestone. The actual mode in which this operation is performed

long puzzled philosophers. Some maintained that the animal secreted

an acid which had the power of dissolving not only various kinds of

stone, but also wood, amber, wax, and other substances, in which the

excavations are occasionally made. But it was hard to imagine a solvent

of substances so various, and to know how the animals’ own shells were

preserved from its action; while, confessedly, no such acid had ever

been detected by the most careful tests.

Others maintained that the rough points which stud the shell enable it

to serve as a rasp, which the animal, by rotating on its axis, uses

to wear away the stone or other material; but it was difficult to

understand how it was that the shell itself was not worn away in the

abrasion.

Another zoologist, rejecting this hypothesis, maintained that the edges

of the mantle and the short thick foot are the instruments employed;

and that, though these fleshy organs seem little fitted for such

work, they are really endowed with the requisite power in the shape

of crystals of flint which are deposited thickly in their substance.

Strange to say, however, other accurate observers fail to detect these

siliceous crystals, and therefore reject the hypothesis.

Another suggested that the stone was removed in invisible particles by

the constant action of currents in the water, produced by vibratile

cilia seated on the soft parts of the animal; but this supposition was

found untenable on examination.

Actual observation in the aquarium has proved that the second

hypothesis is the true one. M. Cailliaud in France and Mr. Robertson

in England have demonstrated that the Pholas uses its shell as a

rasp, wearing away the stone with the asperities with which the

anterior parts of the valves are furnished. Between these gentlemen a

somewhat hot contention was maintained for the honour of priority in

this valuable discovery. M. Cailliaud himself used the valves of the

dead shell, and imitating the natural conditions as well as he could,

actually bored an imitative hole, by making them rotate. Mr. Robertson,

at Brighton, exhibited to the public living Pholades in the act of

boring in masses of chalk. He described it as “a living combination

of three instruments, viz., a hydraulic apparatus, a rasp, and a

syringe.” But the first and last of these powers can be considered

only as accessory to the removing of the detritus out of the way,

when once the hole was bored, the _rasp_ being the real power. If you

examine these living shells, you will see that the fore part, where

the foot protrudes, is set with stony points arranged in transverse

and longitudinal rows, the former being the result of elevated ridges

radiating from the hinge, the latter that of the edges of successive

growths of the shell. These points have the most accurate resemblance

to those set on a steel rasp in a blacksmith’s shop. It is interesting

to know that the shell is preserved from being itself prematurely worn

away by the fact, that it is composed of arragonite, a substance much

harder than those in which the Pholas burrows. Yet we see by the

specimens before us that such a destructive action does in time take

place, for some of these have the rasping points much more worn than

others, many of the older ones being nearly smooth.

The animal turns in its burrow from side to side when at work, adhering

to the interior by the foot, and therefore only partially rotating to

and fro. The substance is abraded in the form of fine powder, which

is periodically ejected from the mouth of the hole by the contraction

of the branchial siphon; a good deal of the more impalpable portions

being deposited by the current as it proceeds, and lodging as a soft

mud between the valves and the stone. Mr. Hudson,[28] who watched some

Pholades at work in a tide-pool in the chalk, observed the periodic

ejection of the cloud of chalk-powder, and noticed the heaps of the

same material deposited around the mouth of each burrow. The discharges

were made with no regularity as to time. Mrs. Merrifield[29] records

a curious fact. “A lady, watching the operations of some Pholades

which were at work in a basin of sea-water, perceived that two of

them were boring at such an angle that their tunnels would meet.

Curious to ascertain what they would do in this case, she continued

her observations, and found that _the larger and stronger Pholas bored

straight through the weaker one_, as if it had been merely a piece of

chalk rock.”

Mr. Ross, of Rhyl, having a Pholas in his aquarium, prepared a piece of

wood, by excavating a shallow cavity, about a quarter of an inch deep,

in which he set the animal, whose shell was two inches long. “After

a short time the animal attached its foot to the bottom of the hole

and commenced swaying itself from side to side, until the hole was of

sufficient depth to allow it to proceed in the following manner:--It

inflated itself with water, apparently to its fullest extent, raising

its shell upwards from the hole; then holding by its muscular foot, it

drew its shell gradually down. This would have produced a perpendicular

and very inefficient action, but for a wise provision of nature. The

edges of the valves are not joined close together, but are connected

by a membrane (extension of the mantle), and instead of being joined

at the hinge (umbo) like ordinary bivalves, they possess an extra

plate, attached to each valve of the shell, which is necessary for the

following operation:--In boring, this mollusk, having dilated itself

with water, draws down its shell within the hole, gradually closing the

lower anterior edges until they almost touch. It then raises its shell

upwards, gradually opening the lower anterior edges, and closing the

upper, thus boring both upwards and downwards. The spines are placed

in rows, like the teeth of a saw; those towards the lower part of the

shell being sharp and pointed, while those above, being now useless,

are not renewed.”[30]

A year at the shore · 第 86 / 292 题