But it is the last sixty years that have made most havoc with our Milesian

names. It seemed as if the people were possessed with a mania for changing

them to something--anything at all, only to get rid of the Milesian sound.

"Why," said O'Connell, once talking to a mass-meeting of Lord Chancellor

Sugden, "you wouldn't call a decent pig Sugden." Yet he never uttered a

word of remonstrance at the O'Lahiffs, O'Brollahans, and MacRorys becoming

under his eyes Guthrys, Bradleys, and Rogerses. It is more than a little

curious, and a very bad augury for the future independence of Ireland,

that men of education and intelligence like Carleton the novelist, or

Hardiman, author of the "History of Galway" and the "Irish Minstrelsy,"

should have changed their Milesian names, one from that of O'Cairellan,

who was ancient chief of Clandermot, the other from the well-known name of

O'Hargadain. In Connacht alone I know scores of Gatelys, Sextons,

Baldwins, Foxes, Coxes, Footes, Greenes, Keatings, who are really

O'Gatlies, O'Sesnans, O'Mulligans, O'Shanahans, MacGillacullys, O'Trehys,

O'Honeens, and O'Keateys. The O'Hennesys are Harringtons, the

O'Kinsellaghs, Kingsleys and Tinslys, the O'Feehillys Pickleys, and so on.

O'Donovan, writing in 1862, gives a list of names which had recently been

changed in the neighbourhood of Cootehill, Co. Cavan. These Irish names of

MacNebo, MacIntyre, MacGilroy, MacTernan, MacCorry, MacOscar, MacBrehon,

O'Clery, Murtagh, O'Drum, &c., were becoming, or had become, Victory,

Victoria, Callwell, Freeman, King, Nugent, Gilman, Leonard, Godwin,

Goodwin, Smyth, Golderich, Golding, Masterton, Lind, Crosby, Grosby,

Crosse, Corry, Cosgrove, Judge, Brabacy, Brabazon, Clarke, Clerkin,

Cunningham, Drummond, Tackit, Sexton, and Mortimer[20]--not a bad attempt

at West-Britonising for one little town!

Numbers of people, again, like Mr. Davitt or Mr. Hennessy, drop the O and

Mac which properly belong to their names; others, without actually

changing them, metamorphose their names, as we have seen, into every

possible form. I was told in America that the first Chauncey who ever

came out there was an O'Shaughnessy, who went to, I think, Maryland, in

the middle of the last century, and who had twelve sons, who called

themselves Chauncey, and from whom most of or all the Chaunceys in America

are descended. I know people who have translated their names within the

last ten years. This vile habit is going on with almost unabated vigour,

and nobody has ever raised a protest against it. Out of the many hundreds

of O'Byrnes--offshoots of the great Wicklow chieftains--in the city of New

York, only four have retained that name; all the rest have taken the

Scotch name of Burns. I have this information from two of the remaining

four, both friends of my own, and both splendid Gaelic scholars, though

from opposite ends of Ireland, Donegal and Waterford. Of two brothers of

whom I was lately told, though I do not know them personally, one is an

O'Gara, and still condescends to remain connected with the patron of the

Four Masters and a thousand years of a glorious past, whilst the other

(through some etymological confusion with the word Caraim, which means "I

love") calls himself Mr. Love! Another brother remains a Brehony, thus

showing his descent from one of the very highest and most honourable

titles in Ireland--a Brehon, law-giver and poet; the other brother is John

Judge. In fact, hundreds of thousands of Irishmen prefer to drop their

honourable Milesian names, and call themselves Groggins or Duggan, or

Higgins or Guthry, or any other beastly name, in preference to the

surnames of warriors, saints, and poets; and the melancholy part of it is,

that not one single word of warning or remonstrance has been raised, as

far as I am aware, against this colossal cringing either by the Irish

public press or public men.

With our Irish Christian names the case is nearly as bad. Where are now

all the fine old Irish Christian names of both men and women which were in

vogue even a hundred years ago? They have been discarded as unclean

things, not because they were ugly in themselves or inharmonious, but

simply because they were not English. No man is now christened by a Gaelic

name, "nor no woman neither." Such common Irish Christian names as Conn,

Cairbre, Farfeasa, Teig, Diarmuid, Kian, Cuan, Ae, Art, Mahon, Eochaidh,

Fearflatha, Cathan, Rory, Coll, Lochlainn, Cathal, Lughaidh, Turlough,

Éamon, Randal, Niall, Sorley, and Conor, are now extinct or nearly so.

Donough and Murrough survive in the O'Brien family. Angus, Manus, Fergal,

and Felim are now hardly known. The man whom you call Diarmuid when you

speak Irish, a low, pernicious, un-Irish, detestable custom, begot by

slavery, propagated by cringing, and fostered by flunkeyism, forces you to

call Jeremiah when you speak English, or as a concession, Darby. In like

manner, the indigenous Teig is West-Britonised into Thaddeus or Thady, for

no earthly reason than that both begin with a T. Donough is Denis, Cahal

is Charles, Murtagh and Murough are Mortimer, Dómhnall is Daniel,

Partholan, the name of the earliest coloniser of Ireland, is Bartholomew

or Batty,[21] Eoghan (Owen) is frequently Eugene, and our own O'Curry,

though he plucked up courage to prefix the O to his name in later life,

never discarded the Eugene, which, however, is far from being a

monstrosity like most of our West-Britonised names; Félim is Felix,

Finghin (Finneen) is Florence, Conor is Corney, Turlough is Terence,

Éamon is Edmond or Neddy, and so on. In fact, of the great wealth of

Gaelic Christian names in use a century or two ago, only Owen, Brian,

Cormac, and Patrick seem to have survived in general use.

Nor have our female names fared one bit better; we have discarded them

even more ruthlessly than those of our men. Surely Sadhbh (Sive) is a

prettier name than Sabina or Sibby, and Nóra than Onny, Honny, or Honour

(so translated simply because Nóra sounds like _onóir_, the Irish for

"honour"); surely Una is prettier than Winny, which it becomes when

West-Britonised. Mève, the great name of the Queen of Connacht who led the

famous cattle spoiling of Cuailgne, celebrated in the greatest Irish epic,

is at least as pretty as Maud, which it becomes when Anglicised, and

Eibhlin (Eileen) is prettier than Ellen or Elinor. Aoife (Eefy), Sighle

(Sheela), Móirin (Moreen), Nuala and Fionnuala (Finnoola), are all

beautiful names which were in use until quite recently. Maurya and Anya

are still common, but are not indigenous Irish names at all, so that I do

not mind their rejection, whilst three other very common ones, Suraha,

Shinéad, and Shuwaun, sound so bad in English that I do not very much

regret their being translated into Sarah, Jane, and Joan respectively; but

I must put in a plea for the retention of such beautiful words as Eefee,

Oona, Eileen, Mève, Sive, and Nuala. Of all the beautiful Christian names

of women which were in use a century or two ago Brighid (Breed), under the

ugly form of Bridget, or still worse, of Biddy, and Eiblin under the form

of Eveleen, and perhaps Norah, seem to be the only survivals, and they are

becoming rarer. I _do_ think that the time has now come to make a vigorous

protest against this continued West-Britonising of ourselves, and that our

people ought to have a word in season addressed to them by their leaders

which will stop them from translating their Milesian surnames into hideous

Saxon, and help to introduce Irish instead of English Christian names. As

long as the Irish nation goes on as it is doing I cannot have much hope of

its ultimately taking its place amongst the nations of the earth, for if

it does, it will have proceeded upon different lines from every other

nationality that God ever created. I hope that we shall never be

satisfied either as individuals or as a society as long as the Brehonys

call themselves Judges, the Clan Govern call themselves Smiths, and the

O'Reardons Salmons, as long as our boys are called Dan and Jeremiah

instead of Donal and Diarmuid, and our girls Honny, Winny, and Ellen

instead of Nóra, Una, and Eileen.

Our topographical nomenclature too--as we may now be prepared to

expect--has been also shamefully corrupted to suit English ears; but

unfortunately the difficulties attendant upon a realteration of our

place-names to their proper forms are very great, nor do I mean to go into

this question now, for it is one so long and so difficult that it would

require a lecture, or rather a series of lectures to itself. Suffice it to

say, that many of the best-known names in our history and annals have

become almost wholly unrecognisable, through the ignorant West-Britonising

of them. The unfortunate natives of the eighteenth century allowed all

kinds of havoc to be played with even their best-known names. For example

the river Feóir they allowed to be turned permanently into the Nore, which

happened this way. Some Englishman, asking the name of the river, was

told that it was _An Fheóir_, pronounced In n'yore, because the F when

preceded by the definite article _an_ is not sounded, so that in his

ignorance he mistook the word Feóir for Neóir, and the name has been thus

perpetuated. In the same way the great Connacht lake, Loch Corrib, is

really Loch Orrib, or rather Loch Orbsen, some Englishman having mistaken

the C at the end of loch for the beginning of the next word. Sometimes the

Ordnance Survey people make a rough guess at the Irish name and jot down

certain English letters almost on chance. Sometimes again they make an

Irish word resemble an English one, as in the celebrated Tailtin in Meath,

where the great gathering of the nation was held, and, which, to make sure

that no national memories should stick to it, has been West-Britonised

Telltown.[22] On the whole, our place names have been treated with about

the same respect as if they were the names of a savage tribe which had

never before been reduced to writing, and with about the same

intelligence and contempt as vulgar English squatters treat the

topographical nomenclature of the Red Indians. These things are now to a

certain extent stereotyped, and are difficult at this hour to change,

especially where Irish names have been translated into English, like

Swinford and Strokestown, or ignored as in Charleville or Midleton. But

though it would take the strength and goodwill of an united nation to put

our topographical nomenclature on a rational basis like that of Wales and

the Scotch Highlands, there is one thing which our Society can do, and

that is to insist upon pronouncing our Irish names properly. Why will a

certain class of people insist upon getting as far away from the

pronunciation of the natives as possible? I remember a Galway gentleman

pulling me up severely for speaking of Athenree. "It's not Athenree," he

said, "it's called Athenrye." Yet in saying this he simply went out of his

way to mispronounce the historic name, which means the "King's ford," and

which all the natives call -_ree_, not -_rye_.[23] Another instance out of

many thousands is my own market town, Ballagh-a-derreen, literally,

"the way of the oak-wood." Ballach is the same word as in the phrase _Fág

a' bealach_, "clear the way," and "derreen" is the diminutive of Derry, an

oak-wood. Yet the more "civilised" of the population, perhaps one in

fifty, offend one's ears with the frightful jargon Bálla-hád-her-een. Thus

Lord Iveagh (Ee-vah) becomes Lord Ivy, and Seana-guala, the old sholder,

becomes Shanagolden, and leads you to expect a mine, or at least a

furze-covered hill.

I shall not give any more examples of deliberate carelessness, ineptitude,

and West-Britonising in our Irish topography, for the instances may be

numbered by thousands and thousands. I hope and trust that where it may be

done without any great inconvenience a native Irish Government will be

induced to provide for the restoration of our place-names on something

like a rational basis.

* * * * *

Our music, too, has become Anglicised to an alarming extent. Not only has

the national instrument, the harp--which efforts are now being made to

revive in the Highlands--become extinct, but even the Irish pipes are

threatened with the same fate. In place of the pipers and fiddlers who,

even twenty years ago, were comparatively common, we are now in many

places menaced by the German band and the barrel organ. Something should

be done to keep the native pipes and the native airs amongst us still. If

Ireland loses her music she loses what is, after her Gaelic language and

literature, her most valuable and most characteristic possession. And she

is rapidly losing it. A few years ago all our travelling fiddlers and

pipers could play the old airs which were then constantly called for, the

_Cúis d'á pléidh_, _Drinaun Dunn_, _Roseen Dubh_, _Gamhan Geal Bán_,

_Eileen-a-roon_, _Shawn O'Dwyer in Glanna_, and the rest, whether gay or

plaintive, which have for so many centuries entranced the Gael. But now

English music-hall ballads and Scotch songs have gained an enormous place

in the repertoire of the wandering minstrel, and the minstrels themselves

are becoming fewer and fewer, and I fear worse and worse. It is difficult

to find a remedy for this. I am afraid in this practical age to go so far

as to advocate the establishment in Cork or Galway of a small institution

in which young and promising pipers might be trained to play all the

Irish airs and sent forth to delight our population; for I shall be told

that this is not a matter for even an Irish Government to stir in, though

it is certain that many a Government has lavished money on schemes less

pleasant and less useful. For the present, then, I must be content with

hoping that the revival of our Irish music may go hand in hand with the

revival of Irish ideas and Celtic modes of thought which our Society is

seeking to bring about, and that people may be brought to love the purity

of _Siúbhail Siúbhail_, or the fun of the _Moddereen Ruadh_ in preference

to "Get Your Hair Cut," or "Over the Garden Wall," or, even if it is not

asking too much, of "Ta-ra-ra-boom-de-ay."

Our games, too, were in a most grievous condition until the brave and

patriotic men who started the Gaelic Athletic Association took in hand

their revival. I confess that the instantaneous and extraordinary success

which attended their efforts when working upon national lines has filled

me with more hope for the future of Ireland than everything else put

together. I consider the work of the association in reviving our ancient

national game of +caman+, or hurling, and Gaelic football, has done more

for Ireland than all the speeches of politicians for the last five years.

And it is not alone that that splendid association revived for a time with

vigour our national sports, but it revived also our national

recollections, and the names of the various clubs through the country have

perpetuated the memory of the great and good men and martyrs of Ireland.

The physique of our youth has been improved in many of our counties; they

have been taught self-restraint, and how to obey their captains; they have

been, in many places, weaned from standing idle in their own roads or

street corners; and not least, they have been introduced to the use of a

thoroughly good and Irish garb. Wherever the warm striped green jersey of

the Gaelic Athletic Association was seen, there Irish manhood and Irish

memories were rapidly reviving. There torn collars and ugly neckties

hanging awry and far better not there at all, and dirty shirts of bad

linen were banished, and our young hurlers were clad like men and

Irishmen, and not in the shoddy second-hand suits of Manchester and London

shop-boys. Could not this alteration be carried still further? Could we

not make that jersey still more popular, and could we not, in places

where both garbs are worn, use our influence against English second-hand

trousers, generally dirty in front, and hanging in muddy tatters at the

heels, and in favour of the cleaner worsted stockings and neat breeches

which many of the older generation still wear? Why have we discarded our

own comfortable frieze? Why does every man in Connemara wear home-made and

home-spun tweed, while in the midland counties we have become too proud

for it, though we are not too proud to buy at every fair and market the

most incongruous cast-off clothes imported from English cities, and to

wear them? Let us, as far as we have any influence, set our faces against

this aping of English dress, and encourage our women to spin and our men

to wear comfortable frieze suits of their own wool, free from shoddy and

humbug. So shall we de-Anglicise Ireland to some purpose, foster a native

spirit and a growth of native custom which will form the strongest barrier

against English influence and be in the end the surest guarantee of Irish

autonomy.

I have now mentioned a few of the principal points on which it would be

desirable for us to move, with a view to de-Anglicising ourselves; but

perhaps the principal point of all I have taken for granted. That is the

necessity for encouraging the use of Anglo-Irish literature instead of

English books, especially instead of English periodicals. We must set our

face sternly against penny dreadfuls, shilling shockers, and still more,

the garbage of vulgar English weeklies like _Bow Bells_ and the _Police

Intelligence_. Every house should have a copy of Moore and Davis. In a

word, we must strive to cultivate everything that is most racial, most

smacking of the soil, most Gaelic, most Irish, because in spite of the

little admixture of Saxon blood in the north-east corner, this island _is_

and will _ever_ remain Celtic at the core, far more Celtic than most

people imagine, because, as I have shown you, the names of our people are

no criterion of their race. On racial lines, then, we shall best develop,

following the bent of our own natures; and, in order to do this, we must

create a strong feeling against West-Britonism, for it--if we give it the

least chance, or show it the smallest quarter--will overwhelm us like a

flood, and we shall find ourselves toiling painfully behind the English at

each step following the same fashions, only six months behind the English

ones; reading the same books, only months behind them: taking up the same

fads, after they have become stale _there_, following _them_ in our dress,

literature, music, games, and ideas, only a long time after them and a

vast way behind. We will become, what, I fear, we are largely at present,

a nation of imitators, the Japanese of Western Europe, lost to the power

of native initiative and alive only to second-hand assimilation. I do not

think I am overrating this danger. We are probably at once the most

assimilative and the most sensitive nation in Europe. A lady in Boston

said to me that the Irish immigrants had become Americanised on the

journey out before ever they landed at Castle Gardens. And when I ventured

to regret it, she said, shrewdly, "If they did not at once become

Americanised they would not be Irish." I knew fifteen Irish workmen who

were working in a haggard in England give up talking Irish amongst

themselves because the English farmer laughed at them. And yet O'Connell

used to call us the "finest peasantry in Europe." Unfortunately, he took

little care that we should remain so. We must teach ourselves to be less

sensitive, we must teach ourselves not to be ashamed of ourselves, because

the Gaelic people can never produce its best before the world as long as

it remains tied to the apron-strings of another race and another island,

waiting for _it_ to move before it will venture to take any step itself.

In conclusion, I would earnestly appeal to every one, whether Unionist or

Nationalist, who wishes to see the Irish nation produce its best--and

surely whatever our politics are we all wish that--to set his face against

this constant running to England for our books, literature, music, games,

fashions, and ideas. I appeal to every one whatever his politics--for this

is no political matter--to do his best to help the Irish race to develop

in future upon Irish lines, even at the risk of encouraging national

aspirations, because upon Irish lines alone can the Irish race once more

become what it was of yore--one of the most original, artistic, literary,

and charming peoples of Europe.

Footnotes:

[1] Adam Smith's "Wealth of Nations."

[2] Being the substance of a Lecture delivered at the Opening of the Irish

National Literary Society--in Dublin, Sir C. G. Duffy in the chair.

[3] But not now of entire words, as in the _rime riche_ of the French,

where _livre_ (book) rhymes with _livre_ (pound). English "perfect" rhyme

is an incomplete word-echo, which secures some variety.

[4] Sporadic exceptions of course are found in Ovid's occasional leonine

lines. It is suggestive that he lived long and died amidst Scythians, from

whom the Irish Gael deduce their descent.

[5] _E.g._, in its end-words: _tracht_, _eácht_, _fuàcht_, _ruacht_.

[6] These rhymes are more subtly complete than may be supposed, for the

chiming syllables are enriched by this, that the preceding consonants =d=

and =g= (as "soft"), and =t= and =p= (as "hard"), give class-chimes.

Besides this, we have alliteration of two vowels in the first line, and of

two consonants in the second.

[7] Hunt, "History of Bristol, 1884."

[8] In the third line, the letters =v= and =r= are in (imperfect) concord.

They belong to the same class of "light" consonants, from which it might

be inferred that the ancient Irish did not roll the letter _r_.

[9] Thegan; Pithou: Opp. cvii.

[10] Malmesbury is a modification of Mailduff's burg.

[11] _I.e._, Hoved, The Head.

[12] Hr. Sjöden, the eminent Swedish harper, noted several Scandinavian

airs but slightly varied from the Irish.

[13] Messrs. Vigfusson and York Powell in "Corpus Poeticum Boreale," &c.

[14] Vigfusson, Prolegomena to Sturlunga Saga.

[15] From the Irish name, Cormac.

[16] Shakespeare mentions an old Irish air, _Cailin og astor_ (in "Henry

II.", act iv., sc. 4); the air itself is give in Queen Elizabeth's

Virginal Book, so that Irish music must have been admired at her court. It

is curious to see the Irish alliteration still influential in the verses

attributed to her:

"The doubt of =f=uture =f=oes exiles my present joy,

And =w=it me =w=arns to =s=hun =s=uch =s=nares as threaten mine annoy;

For =f=alsehood now doth =f=low and subject =f=aith doth ebb,

Which would not be if =r=eason =r=uled or =w=isdom =w=eaved the =w=eb."

It is most interesting to observe that Shakespeare himself employs

alliteration in his epitaph, and used it in a manner so closely conforming

to the regular Irish system, as to suggest his acquaintance with it,

_e.g._:

"Good =f=riend for Jesus' sake =f=orbeare,

To =d=ig the =d=ust enclosed here,

=B=lesst =b=e he who =s=pares these =s=tones,

And cursed =b=e he who moves my =b=ones."

[17] It has been computed that, in the petty princedom of Tyrconnell (now

Donegall county nearly) the real estate allocated to maintenance of the

_literati_ amounted in value to £2,000 yearly, present currency.

[18] Delivered before the Irish National Literary Society in Dublin,

November 25th, 1892.

[19] As an instance of this, I mention the case of a young man I met on

the road coming from the fair of Tuam, some ten miles away. I saluted him

in Irish, and he answered me in English. "Don't you speak Irish," said I.

"Well, I declare to God, sir," he said, "my father and mother hasn't a

word of English, but still, I don't speak Irish." This was absolutely true

for him. There are thousands upon thousands of houses all over Ireland

to-day where the old people invariably use Irish in addressing the

children, and the children as invariably answer in English, the children

understanding Irish but not speaking it, the parents understanding their

children's English but unable to use it themselves. In a great many cases,

I should almost say most, the children are not conscious of the existence

of two languages. I remember asking a gossoon a couple of miles west of

Ballaghaderreen in the Co. Mayo, some questions in Irish and he answered

them in English. At last I said to him, "_Nach labhrann tu Gaedheilg?_"

(_i.e._, "Don't you speak Irish?") and his answer was, "And isn't it Irish

I'm spaking?" "No _a-chuisle_," said I, "it's not Irish you're speaking,

but English." "Well then," said he, "that's how I spoke it ever"! He was

quite unconscious that I was addressing him in one language and he

answering in another. On a different occasion I spoke Irish to a little

girl in a house near Kilfree Junction, Co. Sligo, into which I went while

waiting for a train. The girl answered me in Irish until her brother came

in. "Arrah now, Mary," said he, with what was intended to be a most bitter

sneer; "and isn't that a credit to you!" And poor Mary--whom I had with

difficulty persuaded to begin--immediately hung her head and changed to

English. This is going on from Malin Head to Galway, and from Galway to

Waterford, with the exception possibly of a few spots in Donegal and

Kerry, where the people are wiser and more national.

The Revival of Irish Literature Addresses by Sir Charles Gavan Duffy, K.C.M.G, Dr. George Sigerson, and Dr. Douglas Hyde · 第 6 / 8 段