NUMERALS (derived from Table 5) ARE INDICATIVE OF THE RELATIVE
DEGREE OF SPECIALIZATION OF THE SUBSPECIES OF _DIPODOMYS ORDII_
=========================================================
Body Pedal Cranial Bullar Average
---------------------------------------------------------
richardsoni 4 3 3 4 3.5
oklahomae 5 8 5 2 5.0
compactus 1 19 1 3 6.0
sennetti 2 2 10 10 6.0
evexus 15 8 2 1 6.5
medius 12 1 15 11 9.75
obscurus 12 7 10.0
terrosus 25 6 4 6 10.25
fremonti 11 5 12 14 10.5
uintensis 20 7 7 9 10.75
monoensis 6 12 14 13 11.25
ordii 17 23 9 5 13.5
luteolus 27 15 8 8 14.5
extractus 8 4 25 22 14.75
chapmani 26 11 11 12 15.0
montanus 13 10 23 30 19.0
cinderensis 7 18 32 19 19.0
fetosus 9 26 17 24 19.0
utahensis 14 14 28 21 19.25
columbianus 18 22 21 17 19.5
idoneus 31 13 20 15 19.75
priscus 28 30 6 16 20.0
celeripes 3 25 30 23 20.25
cineraceus 24 28 16 18 21.5
marshalli 10 20 33 28 22.75
inaquosus 19 24 22 27 23.0
attenuatus 29 21 18 25 23.25
fuscus 16 27 24 26 23.25
longipes 23 16 26 29 23.5
pallidus 22 32 27 20 25.25
nexilis 21 31 29 33 26.0
cupidineus 30 29 19 31 27.25
palmeri 32 17 31 32 28.0
---------------------------------------------------------
[Illustration: FIG. 23. Distribution of subspecies of _Dipodomys ordii_.
1. _D. o. richardsoni_
2. _D. o. oklahomae_
3. _D. o. compactus_
4. _D. o. sennetti_
5. _D. o. evexus_
6. _D. o. medius_
7. _D. o. obscurus_
8. _D. o. terrosus_
9. _D. o. panguitchensis_
10. _D. o. uintensis_
11. _D. o. sanrafaeli_
12. _D. o. fremonti_
13. _D. o. monoensis_
14. _D. o. ordii_
15. _D. o. luteolus_
16. _D. o. extractus_
17. _D. o. chapmani_
18. _D. o. montanus_
19. _D. o. cinderensis_
20. _D. o. fetosus_
21. _D. o. utahensis_
22. _D. o. columbianus_
23. _D. o. idoneus_
24. _D. o. priscus_
25. _D. o. celeripes_
26. _D. o. cineraceus_
27. _D. o. marshalli_
28. _D. o. inaquosus_
29. _D. o. attenuatus_
30. _D. o. fuscus_
31. _D. o. longipes_
32. _D. o. pallidus_
33. _D. o. nexilis_
34. _D. o. cupidineus_
35. _D. o. palmeri_ ]
=Dipodomys ordii=