RELATIVE SPECIALIZATIONS OF THE SPECIES FOR EACH INDEX

Column headings:

A: Humeroradial

B: Intermembral

C: Crural

D: Tibioradial

E: Femorotarsalmetatarsal

F: Cranial

G: Average

==============================================

A B C D E F G

----------------------------------------------

ordii 5 1 1 1 1 5 2.33

microps 1 2 4 5 4 2 3.0

panamintinus 6 3 3 3 3 1 3.1

agilis 7 4 5 6 6 4 5.3

heermanni 3 6 7 9 5 3 5.5

ingens 4 7 2 8 2 10 5.5

spectabilis 2 11 6 11 7 8 7.5

phillipsii 11 5 10 2 11 7 7.6

merriami 10 9 9 4 10 6 8.0

nitratoides 9 8 8 7 9 9 8.5

deserti 8 10 11 10 8 11 9.6

----------------------------------------------

The figure 1 represents the least specialized condition for the

index, while the figure 11 represents the most specialized

condition. The remainder of the numbers indicate the relative

degree of specialization of each species for each index.

The species that have been examined are listed in Table 3 in increasing

order of specialization from top to bottom.

Usually animals of extreme morphological specialization are much

restricted environmentally. Attempts to correlate the relative

evolutionary position of the various species, as indicated by the degree

of specialization interpreted from the indices with that of habitus has

proven unsuccessful. For example, _Dipodomys merriami_, which is third

from the top in the list as arranged above, is neither restricted to

loose sandy soil as is _D. deserti_ nor to brush as are _D. agilis_ and

_D. venustus_. _D. merriami_ does, nevertheless, inhabit a variety of

habitats from loose sandy soils to rather hard rocky ground. Throughout

the genus there is, however, a general trend toward increased

specialization as the animals adopt the more open desert environment, as

is indicated by the elongation of the tail and hind appendage and

increase in size of the auditory region of the skull. A marked

difference is noted in the size of the pinna of the ear in the various

species. Generally, those species having small pinnae inhabit open

desert country while those with large pinnae inhabit brushy country.

This is in direct contradistinction to the hares and rabbits in which

the small-eared kinds are brush dwellers whereas the large-eared kinds

are inhabitants of open country. Three possible explanations for hares

and rabbits having this specialization of the pinnae are: (1) To enable

the open-dwelling animals with the larger pinnae to hear more readily

the approach of an enemy when it is yet far away, while the brush-living

forms, which rely for escape on a short dash into cover, do not need so

large a "funnel"; (2) large pinnae have been developed by those animals

which live in the open desert as an aid in dissipating the body heat;

(3) large pinnae in brush-dwelling animals would be a decided

disadvantage in rapid movement through the brush. Grinnell (1922:20)

points out that animals with large pinnae usually have small auditory

bullae and conversely, animals with small pinnae have large bullae. This

compensatory factor, implying an auditory function, appears to be

inoperative in _D. panamintinus mohavensis_ which has small ears and

small bullae and in _D. elephantinus_ which has large ears and large

auditory bullae. Grinnell (_loc. cit._) suggests that several additional

factors enter into the problem, such as the amount of digging each

species must do to gain safety, the texture of the soil for burrowing,

the extent of forage area and the type of cover in connection with the

mode of attack of predators. Of these factors, perhaps the most

important are the two first mentioned.

[Illustration: FIGS. 11-15. Ventral views of skulls showing the degree

of development of the auditory bullae and the configuration of the

pterygoid fossae. All figures approximately × 1.

FIG. 11. _Dipodomys ordii compactus_, [M], adult, no. 646, TCWC;

19 mi. S Port Aransas, Mustang Island, Nueces County, Texas;

24 April, 1939.

FIG. 12. _Dipodomys ordii oklahomae_, [F], adult, no. 265456,

USBS; 2-1/4 mi. S Norman, Cleveland County, Oklahoma; 21 March,

1934.

FIG. 13. _Dipodomys ordii richardsoni_, [F], adult, no. 15995, KU;

1 mi. S Lamar, Prowers County, Colorado; 8 September, 1945.

FIG. 14. _Dipodomys ordii nexilis_, [F], adult, no. 149941, USBS;

5 mi. W. Naturita, Montrose County, Colorado; 20 July, 1907.

FIG. 15. _Dipodomys deserti deserti_, [F], adult, no. 18670, KU;

14 mi. WSW Fallon, Churchill County, Nevada; 3 November, 1945.]

[Illustration: FIGS. 16-20. Dorsal views of skulls showing the degrees

of inflation of the auditory bullae and the correlation of large bullae

with small interparietal. All figures approximately × 1.

FIG. 16. _Dipodomys ordii compactus_, for data see Fig. 11.

FIG. 17. _Dipodomys ordii oklahomae_, for data see Fig. 12.

FIG. 18. _Dipodomys ordii richardsoni_, for data see Fig. 13.

FIG. 19. _Dipodomys ordii nexilis_, for data see Fig. 14.

Subspeciation in the Kangaroo Rat, Dipodomys ordii KU. Vol 1 No 23 · 第 26 / 41 题