For more than a year I taught the school daily without any assistance

except that one or two of the advanced boys sometimes taught the junior

classes. Then I engaged, as an assistant, a Mpongwe, named Nduna, a boy

of seventeen years, whose father, Rekwangi, was quite civilized and

an old friend of our mission. Poor Nduna’s life ended very tragically

less than two years later. He was a handsome boy, of quiet disposition

and kind-hearted. He was with me so much in the schoolroom and was so

faithful in his work that I came to know him well and to like him. At

the end of the year he told me that he had the offer of a better-paying

position in one of the bureaus of the government at Libreville and I

advised him to accept it. I understood that he gave good satisfaction to

his employer. After several months a sum of money was stolen from a safe

that had accidentally been left open. There were French clerks in the

same office, but Nduna was the only native. He was immediately arrested.

There was not a shred of evidence against him except that the money had

been stolen from that particular office and that he was the only native

there. It was hard for me to believe that he was guilty even before I had

heard the evidence, and when I supposed that it must be strongly against

him. But when upon inquiry I learned all that was known, I concluded with

a great many others that he was innocent. And the others did not know him

personally as I did.

A native may be capable of committing a very clever theft, but I never

knew a native who could cleverly conceal it. A certain workman, Ndinga,

stole a coat from me, and a few days later walked into the yard with it

on. Ndinga was not intelligent like Nduna. But I knew another boy who

about the same time stole a considerable amount of cash from a white man.

He was a very clever rascal, and proved himself so in the procuring of

the money. Yet he carried it in his pocket as long as it lasted (which

was only a few days) and treated all his friends with lavish generosity.

Among themselves the detective faculty is dull. And this is probably

because they so readily resort to supernatural means of discovering a

criminal, instead of following a natural clue, or weighing the evidence

of circumstances against a suspected person. While the white man racks

his brains with mere probabilities, the native goes to the witch-doctor,

who promises him certainty. The witch-doctor names several persons, often

personal enemies to himself, and they are forced to undergo some ordeal,

such as dipping their hands in boiling oil, which will burn only the

guilty. It is an easy and expeditious method, and especially remunerative

for the witch-doctor. But it involves none of those mental operations

whereby facts are weighed, comparisons made and conclusions reached. The

judgmatical faculty lies dormant. It would not therefore be expected that

the thief would be as careful of his tracks as if he lived in the land

of Sherlock Holmes.

In the case of Nduna no money was found either with him or his relations.

Neither had he spent an extra centime. The natives themselves never

believed Nduna guilty, and there were others also who thought him a

victim of foul play. The natives of Libreville and the immediate vicinity

are treated with humanity and justice, as a rule; but there have been

exceptions to the rule. Nduna was tried and sentenced to imprisonment.

I have forgotten the term of his sentence. He was not strong; his lungs

were weak, and after several months in the noisome prison he developed

tuberculosis. He failed rapidly, and when several more months had passed

it was very plain that he had not long to live. His father, Rekwangi, and

his mother, Aruwi, pleaded piteously for his release, but the request was

sternly refused. I shall never forget the grief of those unhappy parents,

grief mingled inevitably with bitterness against the white man; for they

had no doubt that their boy was innocent. The weeks passed and still the

same message came: “A little worse to-day.”

At length one night some one brought word to Rekwangi that Nduna was

dying. The father hurried to the prison, two miles away. But the guard

told him that the white man would not admit him. If I had only known it

in time I could probably have procured his admission. Or if not, I at

least might have afforded the parents some relief by going in myself and

staying with Nduna. For many of the officials who are bold in dealing

with defenseless black people are abjectly compliant when they confront

a white man. For hours that night the father walked outside the prison

wall crying aloud: “O Nduna, Nduna, my only son, how can I give you up!

It is not God, but the white man who has taken you from me. Is he still

living? Tell him that his poor old father is close to him, standing just

outside the prison wall. O Nduna, my son, my son!”

At last, towards morning, the guard cried out: “Your son is dead.”

Then the wretched man, overwhelmed with grief and frenzied with

bitterness, gave way to doubt of the Christian’s God, and running to the

house of a friend near by asked for rum. “Give me rum,” he cried, “lest I

kill myself.” The rum was given him and he drank till he was drunk.

That morning Nduna’s body was carried home. All the family and many

friends were gathered together. They laid him on a pile of mats on the

floor of the room, with his feet towards the door, and covered him

completely with a coloured robe. As soon as I heard that the body had

come I went to the house. While I was yet a great way from the town I

heard the wail of their mourning dirge; that weird, unceasing cry of

hopeless grief, which I had heard so often, but never before under such

harrowing circumstances, and it smote upon my heart. As many as could

enter the house were sitting on the floor and many on the ground outside.

All the women who were in civilized dress had turned their clothes inside

out as a sign of grief. Aruwi sat on the floor at Nduna’s head, piteously

sobbing. As I entered the door they all stopped mourning and there was

a deep silence. For once, in Africa, I felt that I could not speak. No

words could do justice to that heartrending scene. I stood a long time

before the covered body, as silent as themselves. At last I said: “Aruwi,

I want to see Nduna’s face.”

She turned down the covering and when I had looked at him a while I said:

“It is a good face, Aruwi,—a beautiful face. Nduna was a good boy. You

will not forget, Aruwi, that there was one white man who knew him and

who loved him.”

They remained silent as I withdrew, until I reached the end of the

village street, and then again, they all began to chant the mourning

dirge.

When the members of the Gaboon Church die they are buried in the mission

graveyard on Baraka hill. The reason of this concession on the part of

the mission was probably to enable them to control the burial service

of Christians that it might be a Christian and not a heathen ceremony.

They regard it as a sacred privilege. Nduna was not a member in the

church, and none but members had ever been buried at Baraka. But I broke

the rule, and told Aruwi that, if she wished, Nduna would be buried at

Baraka. And there we buried him that evening. The civilized Mpongwe have

a funeral custom that I like. When the casket is lowered and immediately

after the benediction, coming forward, they drop a handful of earth into

the grave. It is a simple and affecting ceremony and has no superstitious

significance. But during all my years at Gaboon there was no other

funeral at which so many came forward in silence and dropped a handful

of earth into the grave as they seemed to say: “Good-bye, Nduna; you

suffered greatly; may you rest in peace.”

[Illustration: BOJEDI, TEACHER OF FANG SCHOOL.

_He frankly admits the superiority of the white man, but thinks that the

black man is far better-looking._]

But by far the best teacher I ever had in the school, and without doubt

the best native teacher in the entire mission, was Bojedi, a Kombi of

Benito, to which tribe Makuba also belonged. Bojedi was twenty years old

when I engaged him as a teacher and he stayed with me two years, until I

left Africa. He was so well qualified by education and so competent in

mind and disposition that I gradually put the whole work of the school

upon him, except the religious teaching, which left me more time for

itinerating and the oversight and care of the Christians scattered in

many towns. Bojedi had faults that I do not mean to pass by, but without

him the greatly enlarged work of those last two years could never have

been done; and there was probably not in West Africa a native who could

have taken his place. Of all the natives who taught or assisted in the

school he was the only one whom the schoolboys respected and obeyed as

they would a white man. His interest and his efforts far exceeded his

prescribed duties. He had charge of the seventy-five boys, both in the

schoolroom and out of it, twenty-four hours a day. He was there when they

rose and when they went to bed. He insisted upon cleanliness as to their

persons, their beds, their food and the manner of eating it. He oversaw

their work in the yard, chiefly that of cutting grass, and would not

allow any boy to shirk his work. Their most serious disputes he referred

to me, but most of them he settled himself, to my immense relief, and

they all recognized him as fair. Under his constant supervision these

boys, fresh from the worst heathenism, were compelled to live a civilized

life. And this he accomplished without force. I never knew him to strike

a boy, nor ever did I know him to lose his temper. If he kept a boy in

school after hours for not knowing his lesson he stayed with him himself

and helped him with his study. Without my asking it he gathered them into

the school in the evening for an hour’s study, himself helping the duller

boys. He had faults, as I have said, but there were none in his teaching

or his discipline of the boys.

Bojedi was educated in our mission school at Benito. Among the

missionaries of that station there was a French teacher, Mr. Presset,

from whom Bojedi received much of his education. Unlike most Africans he

was a student by nature, and afterwards while he was so busy teaching in

my school he was also pursuing his studies in mathematics and astronomy.

The most that he got from me was music, which was always his pastime.

He had received some instruction in music from Mr. Presset, who gave

him access to his organ. When he came to Gaboon I placed in his house a

baby-organ of my own, and finding that he had unusual musical talent I

began to give him occasional lessons. He made much progress and played

so well that when I was leaving Africa I left the organ and most of my

organ music with him. He played for the singing in school and also in the

Mpongwe Sunday-school.

While Bojedi was still in the school at Benito he was brought into undue

prominence with the French government in a way that reflected credit

upon his scholarship and incidentally landed him in jail with hard

labour. France, it is said, rules for revenue, and this would seem to

be her policy in the Congo Français. A heavy duty is levied on imports

and exports for the purpose of revenue, resulting soon in commercial

stagnation—and no revenue. The Congo Français is a large and increasing

expense to France. The natives pay taxes upon their houses according to

the size and improvements. Each door and each window is taxed. A certain

native of Gaboon, an enterprising young man, who wished to live in

civilized fashion, put a floor in his house. But he was taxed so much for

it that he took it out and went back to the earth floor.

The taxes at Benito were heavy enough, but the local _chef de poste_ had

been collecting far more than was required. The man was probably full

of malaria and had become very irritable; like many of the government

officials he was in need of a long furlough home. Burning native towns

was a favourite pastime. If the people did not pay their taxes promptly

he burned their towns, leaving men, women and children without shelter.

If they paid promptly he required more and when it was not immediately

forthcoming he burned their towns. If he called them to him, and they

were afraid to come, he burned their towns. If for any reason, or no

reason, he doubted that they loved him dearly, he burned their towns. The

illumination was a superb entertainment for his friends. He burned towns

not in the execution of law, but of his own degenerate will, governed

only by a malarious temper.

At last a number of local chiefs addressed a complaint to the

administrator at Bata, who was superior to the _chef de poste_. Bojedi,

at the request of the chiefs, composed and wrote the letter, which I

believe they signed. The administrator sent the letter to the _chef de

poste_ who upon reading it did not think for a moment that any native

could have written it. There was only one white man in the region of

Benito to whom it could possibly be attributed; and that was Mr. Presset

of our mission at Benito. To make sure of the matter he compared the

writing with that of Mr. Presset, from whom he had received letters, and

found that it was the same. The result was that our mission at Benito

suffered considerable ill-treatment at his hands. At length, one day, he

referred to the letter in speaking to Mr. Presset, and was surprised and

almost affronted when the latter denied all knowledge of it. Mr. Presset

asked to see it, and upon looking at it immediately recognized Bojedi’s

writing. Bojedi was arrested and sent to jail, although he was only a boy

who had done what the chiefs had required of him; the letter was theirs,

not his. For months (or perhaps only one—I have forgotten the length of

time) he remained in jail and worked at hard labour carrying stone. When

at last one morning he was released he had scarcely a stitch of clothing

on him and he hid in a bush all day, and walked home to Benito, twenty

miles, during the night.

This latter story also has a sequel. While Bojedi was teaching school in

Gaboon, this same _chef de poste_ who had put him in jail, was there in

Gaboon a few days before sailing for France. Bojedi went to see him, and

did him several kindly services. The day he sailed (it happened to be

Saturday); Bojedi took charge of all his baggage and saw it safely placed

on the steamer, which took the whole afternoon. Thus easily does the

native forgive and forget.

Bojedi was very simple in manners and direct in speech. It never occurred

to him that the purpose of language was “to conceal thought.” One day

shortly before I left Gaboon he remarked that the schoolboys would miss

me greatly. I expressed a doubt on that subject. “O yes, Mr. Milligan,”

said he, “they will feel badly; for I remember that when I was a

schoolboy and Mr. X. left us, we all felt sorry and some of us cried,

although we had called him a beast every day.”

I have said that to commiserate the African for his colour is a waste of

sympathy. One day when I was talking to Bojedi something in the course

of the conversation prompted me to ask him whether he would like to be a

white man. He replied respectfully but emphatically in the negative. I

wished to know his reason; for he acknowledged and fully appreciated the

white man’s superiority. He hesitated to tell me; but I was insistent,

and at length he replied: “Well, we think that we are better-looking.”

I gasped when I thought of some of the vastly ill-looking faces I had

seen in the jungles, and in apology for myself (and for my race, by

implication) I said: “But you have not seen us in our own country, where

there is no malaria, and where we are not yellow and green.”

He quietly asked what colour we were in our own country; to which I

promptly replied: “Pink and white.”

Looking at me steadily for a moment he remarked: “Mr. Milligan, if I

should see you in your own country I am doubtful whether I should know

you.”

The moral weaknesses of the black race are salient and uniform and Bojedi

was far from being an exception to the rule. An imperious sexual impulse

is the racial characteristic; and their surroundings are such that they

cannot escape the temptation. One might think that African society, with

all its tyranny of social law and custom, were contrived with the sole

purpose of immoral indulgence. Many wives is much wealth. Courage, which

is held in highest esteem, is displayed chiefly in stealing other men’s

wives. And under certain circumstances this immorality is even a part of

hospitality. The women are more licentious than the men. A woman boasts

of her elopements. To become the mistress of a white man is a matter of

honour and gives social prestige. The wife of an elder in the Gaboon

Church, speaking of a certain young woman, the daughter of a friend,

said: “Iga is so ‘stuck up’ that she scarcely speaks to me now because

she is living with a white man.” The more glory therefore to missions,

that it is able to establish purity and honour in all the social and

domestic relations of native converts! Even in half-Christian communities

those heathen standards do not entirely prevail.

The Mpongwe women of Gaboon who have long been in contact with the

French are without comparison the most cultivated, best-looking, most

artful, and most dissolute women of the entire coast. The story of their

licentiousness, as Tertullian once said of the women of the ancient

stage, had best remain hid in its own darkness lest it pollute the day.

Most young men of other tribes coming among them as Bojedi did are

like country boys arriving in the city, and are easy quarry. He was

especially an object of pursuit because, having a good position, he had

money; and their need of money is equal to their love of it.

It was during Bojedi’s second year as teacher that I found that he was

living in illicit relations with a certain woman. It was a grief to

me. He was a lovable boy; excepting Ndong Koni and Amvama, none were

nearer to me than Bojedi. I had come to expect almost as much of him

as a white man. Moreover the matter was fraught not only with possible

ruin to himself but also with evil influence for the school. For

although it was only lately that he had made any profession of being a

Christian, he stood before the boys as a Christian in a marked way; had

offered a prayer each morning in opening the school; had talked with

them personally; and had exercised an influence for good that was the

more profound because of their love of him. I wailed until night, after

hearing this report, and then called him into the schoolhouse, where we

would not be disturbed, and there we talked for hours.

I said: “Bojedi, is it true that you are living with Antyandi?”

He replied: “It is true that I am _married_ to Antyandi.”—So he had tried

to make himself believe.

Antyandi would be regarded by any native as a very attractive woman.

Although she looked younger than Bojedi she was really several years

older and was artful according to her years. She had some education and

spoke and wrote French. She could boast of having lived with several

white men, one of them at least of high rank in the government, and from

these associations she had acquired a manner that was decidedly smart

and foreign, not to speak of trunks filled with fine clothes. She was

girlish in form and light in motion and had the reputation of being a

great dancer. It happened once that she danced before King Adandi; not

however for the head of a missionary on a charger, although afterwards

she would doubtless have been glad to have had my head thus presented

to her. A bottle of champagne was all she asked. Adandi was head of the

whole Mpongwe tribe. He was dressed when I saw him last in white shoes,

white flannel trousers and shirt, black velvet coat with a heavy gold

chain suspended from his neck, and a white hat. He had received part

of his education in France. He claimed the dignified distinction of

martyrdom, having been twice imprisoned by the French and once exiled. He

was a convert of the Jesuits and was profoundly religious—barring such

discrepancies as drunkenness, gambling and adultery. King Adandi saw

Antyandi dance and he declared that he would die if he could not add her

to the number of his wives. She refused him however on the ground that

Adandi being a king the relation would involve a degree of constancy on

her part to which she was not accustomed. Then he organized a band of

young men to seize the lady and carry her off, as they do in books. This

had a fine flavour of romance about it. But the chocolate heroine had two

invisible leopards, according to her claim, which attended her day and

night, and with these she dispersed the brigands.

But Bojedi is still in the schoolhouse making a passionate but sorry

defense. He really loved the woman with a fatuous regard, and I believe

she was in love with him. He had first asked her uncle if he could marry

her, and the uncle, the head of her family, although he was supposed to

have absolute authority over her, replied that he had nothing to say in

the matter, for Antyandi would do as she pleased anyway. Others of her

relations had said that no Mpongwe woman would ever be allowed to marry

a Kombi (to which tribe Bojedi belonged) and that the whole Mpongwe tribe

would rise to prevent it. An open marriage was therefore impossible. And,

on the other hand, mere publicity is the only marriage ceremony there is

among Christians of Gaboon, and to forego publicity was to dispense with

all ceremony. But how could a public announcement be called a ceremony?

And how could mere publicity constitute a marriage bond?

This latter is in need of some explanation. Everybody knows that in

France only those marriages are legal which are made by the state. The

Roman Catholic Church insists upon a church marriage also, but it must

follow that of the state, and cannot precede it, the one being a legal

and the other a religious ceremony. In the colonies this same law is

enforced, and the church is not allowed to perform a marriage ceremony

until after the legal ceremony of the state. It happens also that there

are serious impediments to the legal ceremony and sometimes deplorable

consequences. The contracting parties must know their ages—which the

African never knows; must know where they were born—which they have never

thought of asking and everybody has forgotten; must know their parents,

both father and mother. The African knows his mother; but as for his

father, he may never have asked his mother that personal question. They

could easily have recourse to lies and invent a father, but unfortunately

they are required to produce the parents that their verbal consent to the

marriage may be obtained. If the parents are not in the country a written

consent is required; and if they are dead the proofs of their death must

be produced in the form of a burial certificate.

These and other requirements may be good for France, but in Africa they

are puerile nonsense. Moreover, these legal bonds are very hard to break;

and that were well enough if only the moral bonds were strengthened

thereby, but they are not, and in the case of marital infidelity the

law binds only the innocent. For instance two of the very best women in

Gaboon, or in West Africa for that matter, were thus bound to husbands

who deserted them. One of those men took six other wives in utter

disregard of the legal marriage, but that outraged woman could not get a

divorce from him without a difficult and expensive process of law; nor,

being a Christian, was she willing to marry without a divorce. We could

not therefore advise, still less insist, that the Christians be married

by the state, though of course we did not advise to the contrary. And

without the legal marriage we were not allowed to perform the religious

ceremony.

I performed a few such ceremonies for those who had already been married

by the state official. On one occasion the young couple had decided to

be married with a ring. But I knew nothing of their intention, and I was

surprised when the groom, after the ceremony was entirely ended, produced

the ring and asked me what he was supposed to do with it. The bride on

that occasion was dressed in a Mother Hubbard of bright blue calico

decorated with white lobsters. But I officiated at another marriage in

which the bride was beautifully attired, and in good taste that would

have done credit to any white woman.

As the natives objected to the legal form of marriage, and we could

not conscientiously urge it upon them, there was no recognized or

satisfactory form. Of course there are heathen ceremonies, but some of

them are drunken orgies which the Christian conscience cannot allow;

and others are so silly that the civilized natives would regard with

abhorrence any suggestion of their observance. It is said that in some of

the tribes far east of us the bride and groom are required to climb two

young saplings, which are then swayed back and forth until their heads

knock together, whereby the marriage is constituted. One wonders what the

form for divorce would be like!

The jungle folk of Africa · 第 22 / 27 段