CHAPTER V

CHROMIUM

BY E. C. HARDER

USES OF CHROMIUM

Chromite is the principal ore from which metallic chromium and chromium

products are obtained. The theoretical composition of chromite is

represented by the formula FeO Cr₂O₃, which represents 32 per cent.

ferrous oxide and 68 per cent. chromic oxide. In many ores, however,

the ferrous oxide is partly replaced by magnesia, up to 30 per cent.,

and the chromic oxide by alumina and ferric oxide, up to 20 per cent.

Thus the composition of chromite varies considerably. The percentage

of chromic oxide may be as low as 10 per cent.; that of ferrous oxide

may range from 10 to 50 per cent. Other common minerals of chromium are

picotite (chrome spinel), uvarovite (chrome garnet), chrome diopside

and crocoite (lead chromate).

Chrome ore is consumed mainly in the manufacture of special steels

and in tanning leather. The special steels comprise chrome steel,

chrome-nickel steel, chrome-tungsten steel, and chrome-vanadium steel.

Metallic chromium is added to such steel in the form of ferrochrome,

an alloy of chromium and iron containing 60 to 70 per cent. metallic

chromium. Chrome steel is tough and hard to break. It hardens rapidly

and has a fine grain and a fibrous fracture; it does not break readily

upon concussion and because of its hardness is difficult or impossible

to cut with ordinary machine tools. Metallic chromium is present in

percentages varying from 1 to 5 per cent. Special steels containing

chromium are used for guns, armor plate, armor-piercing projectiles,

automobile parts, machine tools, bars for prisons, burglar-proof

safes, shoes, cutlery, crusher jaws, stampmills, springs and for other

articles in which hardness and toughness are necessary. During the war,

when a considerable shortage of chromite threatened, less chromium was

used in chrome steels, and certain other hardening materials were used

in its place. The results are said to have been unsatisfactory, however.

Ferrochrome used in the manufacture of chrome steels is produced in

the electric furnace by smelting a mixture, in proper proportions, of

chromite, coal or coke, lime, and fluorspar or silica.

Much chrome ore is used in the steel industry for refractory materials

in lining open-hearth furnaces. Some of the ore thus used is first

manufactured into chrome brick and some is utilized in the crude

form. Chrome brick is used in open-hearth furnaces as a lining along

the slag line between the magnesite bottom of the furnace and the

silica-brick sides and roof. Chrome brick is used also to cover the

ports of gas-fired furnaces. It is desirable for these purposes

on account of its neutral reaction, which reduces the wear due to

corrosion. Lump or crushed chromite is used for patching the bottoms

of open-hearth furnaces, particularly the toe or apex of the bottom,

the ore being either hammered in place as lump or crushed and mixed

with a little water or tar and clay and then tamped into place. The use

of lump chrome in repairing such furnaces is desirable on account of

the rapidity with which the furnaces can be repaired and on account of

the greater wear that chromite will stand. The amount of chromite used

for this purpose ranges from 2 pounds to 10 pounds per ton of steel

manufactured. Magnesite has been used to replace chromite for repairing

furnaces, but has been found to be more expensive and to stand less

wear.

Chrome brick is used in a minor way in electric furnaces for

manufacturing steel, in a belt along the slag line and in the

area around the pouring lips. It is also being used in furnaces

manufacturing steel by the duplex process.

Chrome brick, besides being used in steel-making furnaces, is used in

lining furnaces for making copper, nickel, and other metals. In these

furnaces it is used in the bottoms and around the tap holes. Magnesite

brick, as well as bauxite brick, have been used to replace chromite

brick for this purpose.

Chromium chemicals used for tanning are mainly sodium or potassium

bichromates. About half of the bichromates produced in the United

States is commonly used for tanning, the remainder being used for

paints, pigments, dry colors, and dyes in the paint, printing and

engraving, and textile industries. Chrome yellow, chrome orange, and

chrome black are used in calico printing and dyeing. Chromic oxide, or

chrome green, is an indelible pigment employed in printing banknotes.

Various other chrome colors are used for paints and pigments as well as

in the ceramic arts. The minor uses of chrome chemicals are many.

GEOLOGICAL DISTRIBUTION

Chromite throughout the world is associated with basic igneous rocks,

such as peridotite or pyroxenite, or with the alteration products

of these rocks, such as serpentine, talc schist, and related rocks.

Chromite deposits are generally in the form of lenses, pods, or

irregular masses that may occur singly or may be associated in groups.

Besides being found as large bodies, chromite occurs as a minor

constituent of these rocks, being widely disseminated through them as

small specks and particles. Chromite that forms workable deposits is

believed to have been separated out of the molten mass of basic igneous

rock by segregation and to have formed separate bodies within the rock

mass during the cooling. Most chromite deposits are found along the

borders of intrusive masses not far from the contact of older rocks

into which they are intruded. This is probably due to the formation of

peripheral fractures during the cooling of the igneous mass, chromite

being forced up into these openings. The action of convection-currents

in the molten magma may also have resulted in localizing chromite

bodies near the borders of the mass. However, bodies of chromite are

quite abundant in other parts of the igneous masses as well, often

being found at long distances from bordering rocks.

By weathering of chromite-bearing igneous rock, chromite bodies

are freed and occur as loose masses in resultant residual clays.

Such bodies in clay are of commercial importance in many places.

The breaking down of chromite-bearing rocks results in setting

free disseminated specks and particles of chromite, and these may

be transported and later deposited along streams flowing out of

chromite-bearing areas. In this manner accumulations of chromite sands

are formed. Besides chromite, these sands usually contain considerable

quantities of other heavy minerals such as magnetite, ilmenite, garnet,

and rutile, and the chromite in them is generally not available

commercially.

GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION AND COMMERCIAL CONTROL

The world’s chromite supply has been obtained mainly from the following

sources, named roughly in order of their importance:

New Caledonia; southern Rhodesia; western and southern Asia Minor; Ural

Mountains, Russia; eastern Greece, adjacent islands, Macedonia, and

Serbia; Baluchistan and Mysore, India; Quebec, Canada; Atlantic and

Pacific coast states, United States; State of Bahia, Brazil; Oriente,

Cuba; Japan; Bosnia and Herzegovina; Austria-Hungary; and Guatemala.

The geographic distribution of the more important deposits of chromite

is shown in Plate IV.

Other countries in which deposits of chromite are known but in which

little or no ore has been produced are: Shetland Islands, Scotland;

Norway; Sweden; Silesia; Portugal; New South Wales, Australia; New

Zealand; Transvaal; Togoland; and Newfoundland.

Table 25 shows the output of chromite in the chief producing countries

from 1905 to 1917.

=Australasia.=--Important quantities of chromite occur on the island

of _New Caledonia_, in the South Pacific, and in smaller amounts in

Australia, New Zealand, and Tasmania.

[Illustration: PLATE IV.--Geographical distribution of the chromite

deposits of the world. By E. C. Harder.]

TABLE 25.--WORLD’S CHROMITE PRODUCTION 1905-1917 IN LONG TONS[53]

-----------------------+--------+------+----------+----------+------+

|1905[54]| 1906 | 1907 | 1908 | 1909 |

-----------------------+--------+------+----------+----------+------+

United States | 22 | 107| 290 | 359 | 598|

Canada[55] | 7,657 | 8,068| 6,425 | 6,451 | 2,205|

Cuba[57] | ... | ...| ... | ... | ...|

Guatemala[57] | ... | ...| ... | ... | ...|

Brazil[57] | | | | | |

Great Britain (Shetland| | | | | |

Islands) | ... | ...| ... | ... | ...|

Norway | ... | ...| 105[56]| ... | ...|

Sweden | ... | ...| ... | ... | ...|

Austria-Hungary (Bosnia| | | | | |

and Herzegovina) | 183 | 315| 305 | 492 | 327|

Greece[60] | 8,759 |11,348|11,545 | 4,281 | 9,448|

Serbia[61] | ... | ...| ... | ... | ...|

Russia | 26,620 |16,708|25,940 |10,777 |21,857|

Turkey[62] (mainly Asia| | | | | |

Minor) | ... |23,404|21,111 |28,394 |11,364|

Rhodesia | ... | 3,256| 8,017 |11,927 |22,875|

India | 2,708 | 4,375| 7,274 | 4,745 | 9,250|

Japan | ... | ...| ... | ... | ...|

New South Wales | 52 | 15| 30 | ... | ...|

New Caledonia | 75,717 |82,910|56,461[56]|24,970[56]|39,368|

-----------------------+--------+------+----------+----------+------+

-----------------------+------+----------+----------+----------+

| 1910 | 1911 | 1912 | 1913 |

-----------------------+------+----------+----------+----------+

United States | 205| 120 | 201 | 255 |

Canada[55] | 267| 140 | ... | ... |

Cuba[57] | ...| ... | ... | ... |

Guatemala[57] | ...| ... | ... | ... |

Brazil[57] | | | | |

Great Britain (Shetland| | | | |

Islands) | ...| ... | ... | ... |

Norway | ...| ... | 113[56]| ... |

Sweden | 31| | | |

Austria-Hungary (Bosnia| | | | |

and Herzegovina) | 315| 246 | 197 | 300[56]|

Greece[60] | 9,311| 4,542 | 6,209 | 6,242[56]|

Serbia[61] | ...| ... | ... | ... |

Russia |14,157| 1,218[56]|20,934 |21,401 |

Turkey[62] (mainly Asia| | | | |

Minor) | [59]|11,993 |16,823[63]| [59]|

Rhodesia |39,287|46,753 |61,840 |62,365 |

India | 1,737| 3,804 | 2,890 | 5,580[56]|

Japan | 2,091| 1,500 | 1,591 | [59]|

New South Wales | ...| 148 | 23 | |

New Caledonia |39,368|34,447 |41,325 |62,352 |

-----------------------+------+----------+----------+----------+

-----------------------+----------+----------+----------+----------

| 1914 | 1915 | 1916 | 1917

-----------------------+----------+----------+----------+----------

United States | 591 | 3,281 |47,035 |43,725

Canada[55] | 121 |11,008 |24,545 |32,457[56]

Cuba[57] | ... | ... | 34 | 17[58]

Guatemala[57] | ... | ... | ... | 179[58]

Brazil[57] | | | |

Great Britain (Shetland| | | |

Islands) | 100 | | |

Norway | 80[56]| 344[56]| |

Sweden | | | |

Austria-Hungary (Bosnia| | | |

and Herzegovina) | 474[56]| [59]| [59]|

Greece[60] | 6,947[56]|10,255[56]| 9,724[56]| [59]

Serbia[61] | ... | [59]| [59]| [59]

Russia | [59]| [59]| [59]| [59]

Turkey[62] (mainly Asia| | | |

Minor) | [59]| [59]| [59]| [59]

Rhodesia |48,235 |60,617[56]|79,350[56]| [59]

India | 5,887[56]| 3,768[56]|20,160[56]| [59]

Japan | 2,075[56]| 2,932[56]| 8,149[56]| [59]

New South Wales | | | |

New Caledonia |41,336[56]|65,941[56]|74,115[64]|41,230[56]

-----------------------+----------+----------+----------+----------

[53] Figures not otherwise credited were obtained from “Mineral

Resources of United States, 1914” and subsequent years, U. S.

Geological Survey (figures originally obtained mainly from the

British statistical publication, _Mines and Quarries_: General report

with statistics, pt. 4, London).

[54] Figures for 1905 taken direct from _Mines and Quarries_, 1905

and 1906.

[55] Mineral production of Canada, 1916, Canada Department of Mines,

Mines Branch.

[56] _Mineral Industry_, 1917.

[57] Exports from Cuba, Guatemala, and Brazil in 1918 were

respectively 8,820 tons, 1,193 tons, and 17,854 tons.

[58] Exports.

[59] Not available.

[60] Production from the Saloniki district included under Turkey

previous to 1914.

[61] Present Serbian deposits in Turkish domain before the war.

[62] Exports from Turkey for fiscal years beginning with March.

[63] _Mines and Quarries_ reports production of Turkey in 1912 as 145

tons.

[64] Stateman’s Year Book, 1918, London.

Serpentine, in masses intruding metamorphic rocks and sediments ranging

in age from Archean to Mesozoic, is abundant throughout the island

of New Caledonia, and chromite invariably is associated with it as a

minor constituent. Locally, large masses of fairly pure chromite are

found, generally as lenticular bodies in the serpentine, but locally as

irregular masses in residual clay derived from the decomposition of the

serpentine.

Chromite deposits of three types are known in New Caledonia, as

follows: Rock chrome, consisting of solid ore bodies in serpentine;

residual chromite, as irregular bodies or scattered masses, frequently

disintegrated, in red residual clay derived from the weathering of

the serpentine; and chrome sand and gravel in surface wash and stream

deposits. Ores of the first two classes are both important commercially

in New Caledonia and are both present in most mines. Ores of the last

named class are not worked.

Of these New Caledonian deposits, that of Mt. d’Or, in the southern

part of the island, was the first to be discovered and worked, being

found by Garnier in 1866. Later the deposits of Ngo Bay and others

further south were exploited. Production and exportation of New

Caledonian chromite began in the early 80’s and continued in a minor

way until 1902, the production coming mainly from Mt. d’Or and the Ngo

Bay deposits.

In 1902, L. Bernheim formed the Société le Chrome, in which French

capital was largely interested. This company operated mines in the

northern and southern parts of the island. It developed the Tiebaghi

deposits near the port of Pagoumene, now among the most important

in New Caledonia. The exportation of chromite soon increased, and

gradually New Caledonian ore replaced Turkish ore in the market. In

1911 the Chrome Co., Ltd., of London, was formed and acquired from

the Société le Chrome the Tiebaghi and other mines. At the same time

it acquired the right from the Rhodesia Chrome Mines Co., Limited,

to market the Rhodesian ore, thus securing practically a monopoly of

the world’s chromite trade. The Chrome Co., Ltd., is controlled by

French and English interests. Chalas & Sons, Finsbury Pavement House,

London, E. C, are the largest stockholders. There were formerly German

stockholders. L. Bernheim does not seem to be associated with the

Chrome Co., Ltd., but it is said that he still owns chromite deposits

in New Caledonia. Besides the operations of the Chrome Co., Ltd.,

there are a number of independent operations in different parts of the

island. These are mainly under the control of inhabitants of the island.

=Africa.=--The important chromite deposits of southern _Rhodesia_

are near the town of Selukwe, which is connected by railroad with

the shipping port of Beira. They occur scattered through an area of

schist and serpentine. One hundred and twenty chromite bodies have been

mapped out, but the only ones that have been developed are ten closely

grouped large bodies at Chrome Mine northwest of Selukwe. One of the

largest bodies is 180 feet wide and 240 feet long. The ores are high

grade, averaging between 48 and 51 per cent. chromic oxide.

Recently considerable publicity has been given to the discovery of what

are reported to be among the largest deposits of high-grade chromite

in the world in the Umvukwe Hills in the Lomagundi district 30 miles

from Banket Junction, southern Rhodesia. The ore is said to occur over

a large area in bodies in serpentine. More than two million tons is

reported to have been uncovered. The deposits were discovered by Albert

Peake, of Umvukwe Ranch, and are owned by Peake Brothers, who are said

to have offered them to the Imperial government on special terms.

Chromite was mined in Rhodesia for the first time in 1905, the ore

coming from claims near Selukwe held by the Bechuanaland Exploration

Company, Ltd. Production steadily increased, slowly at first but more

rapidly after 1910, when the Selukwe mines were taken over by the

Rhodesia Chrome Mines, Ltd. In 1910 the staking of chromite claims in

the Hartley district was reported and in 1911 chromite was discovered

at Victoria. Shipments from Selukwe stopped in August, 1914, after the

declaration of war, but began in December and increased during 1915

and 1916. In 1917 the discovery of the large and valuable deposits of

chromite in the Lomagundi district (already mentioned) was reported.

Previous to 1916 the entire production of Rhodesian chromite came from

the Selukwe mines of the Rhodesia Chrome Mines, Ltd. In 1917, however,

another company, the Rhodesia Metals Syndicate, Ltd., entered the field

and is producing important amounts of ore.

=Asia.=--Before _Turkey_ lost most of her European possessions after

the Balkan wars, the chromite deposits of the Kossowo, Uskub, and

Monastir district of Serbia and the Saloniki district of Greece were

within her borders. Now, however, only the deposits of _Asia Minor_

remain to her.

Chromite deposits are widely scattered through many parts of _Asia

Minor_ and are said to be numbered by the hundreds. The most important

deposits are grouped into three districts: In the regions of Brussa

and Kutahia south of the Sea of Marmora, where the important Daghardi

deposits are found; near Macri, Denislu and around the Gulf of

Adalia in the southwestern part of the peninsula, as well as on the

neighboring Island of Rhodes; and near Mersina, Adana, Aleppo, and

elsewhere in the region around the Gulf of Alexandretta northeast of

the Island of Cyprus. Smaller deposits are reported in the vilayets of

Angora and Kastamuni in the north central part of Asia Minor and near

Beirut and Damascus in Syria. All the ore bodies are found in more

or less schistose and decomposed serpentine in groups of lenslike or

irregular bodies.

The chromite mines of Asia Minor have produced important quantities of

ore. From about 1870, when Turkey began to supplant the United States

as the world’s principal producer of chromite, to near 1900, Asia Minor

furnished the bulk of the chromite for the world’s consumption. Most

of the ore mined has come from the mines in the Brussa region on the

south and southwest slopes of the Mysian Olympus and from the mines

of the Macri region. The Brussa and Kutahia deposits are said to have

produced an average of about 20,000 tons annually for many years, of

which the Daghardi mine is said to have furnished nearly three-fourths.

This deposit consists of high-grade ore averaging 51 to 55 per cent.

chromic oxide and has been estimated to contain about 10,000,000 tons

of ore. Probably this is somewhat an exaggeration, although doubtless

the deposit is large and important.

The chromite mines in the Macri region have furnished a considerable

part of the output of Asia Minor, but much of the ore mined in recent

years has been of low grade, running as low as 40 per cent. chromic

oxide. The chromite near Denislu and that near the Gulf of Adalia, on

the other hand, is said to be very rich, some deposits containing ore

averaging as high as 56 per cent. chromic oxide.

Most of the chromite mines of Asia Minor are probably now under the

control of the Turkish government, having reverted back ten or fifteen

years ago when increasing competition of New Caledonia chromite in

foreign markets resulted in the shutting down of many of the mines. The

taxes on both worked and undeveloped mineral properties are so heavy

in Turkey that unless mines are bringing in continuous and substantial

revenues, they cannot be held by private individuals.

It has been the policy of Turkey not to allow her mineral properties

to fall into the hands of foreigners. Even while the exploitation of

the chromite deposits was most vigorous, therefore, the mines, although

in many places worked by foreign firms, were largely owned by the

Turkish government or by Turkish subjects who leased them. Thus in

1904 the principal deposits near Brussa were owned by an officer of

the Porte and were operated by J. W. Whittal & Co., an English firm in

Constantinople, while other deposits in the same district were worked

by Patterson & Canghellari, an English company located in Smyrna. The

famous Daghardi deposit, in the Kutahia region, at that time was owned

by the Turkish minister of marine and was operated by a Turk named

Raghit Bey.

In the Macri district, a number of low-grade deposits were in 1904

under the control of Patterson & Co., of Smyrna, and the mines near

the Gulf of Adalia were controlled by a French syndicate. Some large

deposits near Denislu, in the interior, north of Macri, are said to be

lying undeveloped owing to the refusal of the Turkish government to

permit mining.

The chromite deposits in the region surrounding the Gulf of

Alexandretta have been worked in a small way both by Turks and

foreigners. Among operators in the region are mentioned Durian Effendi,

a Turk, representing the Ottoman Bank; Husni Herikizadeh Effendi, a

Turk of Adana; Nader Brothers, of Mersina; Alfred Keun & Co. of Smyrna;

Protopazzi Brothers, of Smyrna, and Mavrommati & Sons, of Mersina,

both probably Greek firms; Loizides, of Mersina; and Hadji Kemal Bey,

of Constantinople. Durian Effendi is mentioned also as having operated

chromite mines near Beirut.

The most important chromite deposits of _India_ are in the northern

part of Baluchistan, but the mines of the Madras and Mysore districts

in southern India have also furnished important amounts of ore. A

small production has come from Bengal. The deposits of Baluchistan are

large and the ore is rich, much of it averaging nearly 55 per cent.

chromic oxide. One deposit is reported to be 440 feet long by 5 feet

wide. The ore bodies are segregations in serpentine. The problem of

transportation is difficult, as the ores are far from the coast and

land transportation facilities are poor. Nevertheless, those mines

have made a steady output since they were opened in 1903. The largest

production was in 1907, when the yield exceeded 7,000 tons. Since then

there has been a decrease owing to competition from New Caledonia and

Rhodesia.

Chromite ore bodies were exploited in Madras as early as 1861 and small

amounts of ore were mined intermittently. The ores are associated

with magnesite veins in serpentine. Since 1907 a steady production is

recorded from Madras, which has increased recently. Important deposits

of chromite are found in Mysore. These deposits have produced more than

2,000 tons of ore annually in recent years, which is reported to have

been sent to the United States. The chromite deposits of Bengal are

said to be small and unimportant. In Bombay a large body of low-grade

chromite is said to measure 1,000 by 300 feet and to average 34 per

cent. chromic oxide.

Before 1910 chromite mining in _Japan_ was sporadic and unimportant,

but since 1910 the output has been steady and increasing. The principal

occurrences of chrome ore are in the southwestern part, the mines

of Wakamatsu, in Hoki, being the most important. The ore is said to

average about 40 per cent. chromic oxide. Chromite is also reported to

occur in the northern part of Japan. The Japanese chromite deposits are

small and soon exhausted.

The principal chromite deposits of _Russia_ are in the southern part of

the Ural Mountains and are associated with serpentine and soapstone.

The deposits are classed under three heads: Large granular masses in

serpentine, finely disseminated chromite in serpentine, and chromite

sand in platinum- and gold-bearing placers. The characteristic

occurrence of chromite bodies in the Urals is as segregations within

areas of dunite largely altered to serpentine. Platinum in scattered

grains is associated with chromite in the dunite in several places.

Recently chromite deposits have been reported in the northern part of

the Caucasus Mountains.

=Europe.=--The chromite deposits of the _Balkan Peninsula_ may be

grouped into four main districts: central Serbia; southern Serbia;

Saloniki, in eastern Macedonia; and Magnesia, southern Thessaly, and

the neighboring islands. The chromite deposits are found in serpentine

derived from the alteration of peridotite.

The chromite mines of _Serbia_ and _Macedonia_ for many years furnished

a small production, credited to European Turkey, which before the

last Balkan War embraced all the chromite-bearing areas. Many of the

deposits of central Serbia are poorly situated with reference to

transportation, the ore being hauled on carts to the railroad stations

and thence by rail to the coast. In eastern Macedonia some of the

mines are relatively near the coast and the ore is carried on carts

to Saloniki. The mines of Serbia and Macedonia were worked in part by

individuals and in part by the same firms which mined the chrome ores

of Asia Minor, such as Patterson & Co., Whittal & Co., and others.

The chromite mines of Magnesia, Thessaly, and adjacent islands in

eastern _Greece_ have furnished a more or less continuous output for

the last 30 or 40 years. The ore mined, however, has been mainly of low

grade, most of it averaging between 30 and 40 per cent. chromic oxide.

It is said to be used largely for refractory purposes. Before 1908 most

of the Grecian production of chromite came from the mines of Magnesia,

but more recently the mines of southern Thessaly have furnished most of

the ore. Mines in the Grecian Archipelago have also furnished some ore.

The annual output of Greece has varied from a few hundred tons to more

than 15,000 tons. During the past 20 years it has rarely fallen below

5,000 tons.

Chromiferous iron ore in considerable quantity is mined in Greece,

most of it being exported. In 1913 ten or more mines were worked. The

production has averaged more than 100,000 tons annually. The mines are

operated in part by Greek and in part by French and British firms.

The chromic iron ores produced in the former _Austrian Empire_ have

come mainly from the central part of Bosnia, but the chromite mines in

Upper Styria and those on the Roumanian border have also furnished an

appreciable output, the ore being low-grade. The deposits of Bosnia are

in serpentine. The ore is of good quality and has been mined for use

as a furnace lining. On and near the left bank of the Danube River in

the Banat, Hungary, there is an extensive area of serpentine containing

chromite in bunches. The deposits have been worked to a slight extent.

=North America.=--In _Canada_ chromite-bearing areas of considerable

extent are found in the southern part of the Province of Quebec, where

nearly all the productive chromite mines of Canada are situated. The

ore occurs in serpentine in irregular masses and pockets without

definite form, that range in size up to 75 feet along the longer axis,

rarely reaching 100 feet. The amount of high-grade ore in the Quebec

chromite deposits is not large, but low-grade ore bodies which under

normal market conditions can not be mined at a profit are numerous

and of large size. The low-grade ores range in content of chromic

oxide from less than 20 per cent. to 35 or 40 per cent. Nearly all

the Canadian ore mined has been exported to the United States. From

1910 to 1914 the output of chrome ore from the Quebec mines was

insignificant, owing to the cost of mining low-grade ores and the lack

of a market for them. When the price of chromite rose late in 1914,

American firms began active developments in the field, and subsequently

two concentrators were built by the Mutual Chemical Co. The output of

Canadian chromite, both of crude ore and concentrates, during the war

period was noteworthy, the production rising from 121 long tons in

1914, to 47,035 long tons in 1916 and 43,725 long tons in 1917.

The principal American firms interested in the development of the

Canadian chromite deposits during the past few years have been the

Mutual Chemical Co., the Harbison-Walker Refractories Co., the

Electrometallurgical Co., and the Quebec Asbestos & Chrome Co. The

last-named company purchased one of the concentrators built by the

Mutual Chemical Co., and has furnished a considerable output both

of crude ore and concentrates. Canadian firms have also produced

considerable ore.

With the close of the war and the drop in the price of chromite, the

Canadian mines have been largely abandoned. It is possible, however,

that some American firms that mine ore for use in their own plants may

continue work on a small scale.

When the _United States_ was the world’s principal chromite-producing

country, the output came from the eastern United States and principally

from Maryland. The Wood chrome mine and neighboring deposits in

Baltimore and Harford counties furnished most of the production.

Smaller amounts were mined in North Carolina and Pennsylvania.

The principal chromite deposits of the United States, and those that

have furnished nearly all the ore produced in recent years, are in

California and Oregon. Recently deposits of some extent have been

found in Montana, but these have not reached the producing stage. The

chromite deposits of California are for the most part grouped into

four principal districts, the Klamath Mountains region of northwestern

California and southwestern Oregon; the Coast Range of west central

California; the Sierra Nevada range throughout a considerable part of

its length; and the San Luis Obispo district of southwestern California.

The chrome ores of California and Oregon form lenses or irregular

bodies in serpentine and related rocks. Many of the ore bodies are

found in comparatively fresh peridotite and dunite, and the intimate

relation between the chromite and the associated pyroxene or olivine is

well shown. In places, also, chromite masses are found in the mantle of

residual material derived from the alteration of serpentine and other

rocks. Most of the chrome ores of the Pacific Coast are of low-grade,

few running more than 45 per cent. chromic oxide. Concentrating plants

have been built to beneficiate the ore from bodies large enough to

warrant such expenditure. At some plants the grade of ore was thus

raised to more than 52 per cent. Locally small bodies of high-grade ore

have been found.

The chromite mines of the eastern United States were first worked about

1827 and continued to be operated for about forty years. The California

deposits began to be developed about 1870, but never furnished a large

output until the war raised the price of chromite to unprecedented

figures and ore could be produced at a profit in spite of high costs

and high freight rates to consuming centers. The chromite mines of

the United States have always been worked and controlled by American

capital. In California the ore has been mined mainly by private

individuals working small scattered deposits. A few large firms, such

as the California Chrome Co., the Adams & Maltby Co., L. H. Butcher

Co., and the Union Chrome Co., worked on a larger scale during the war

period.

Deposits of chromite have been known in Alaska for a number of years,

but not until the war brought high prices was it possible to mine

them at a profit. The deposits of present importance are near the

southwestern end of the Kenai Peninsula. About 1,000 tons of ore

containing 46 to 49 per cent. chromic oxide was mined in 1917.

=South America, Central America and Cuba.=--As far as is known, only

one chromite-bearing district of importance occurs in South America,

this being in the State of Bahia, in _Brazil_. One deposit has been

worked at this locality by E. J. Lavino & Co., of Philadelphia, and

the discovery of several neighboring deposits is reported. The first

shipments of ore were made in February, 1918, and by July 1, 1918,

12,620 tons had been sent to the United States. The deposits are said

to be owned by Newman & Co., a firm of American exporters in Bahia.

They are leased to E. J. Lavino & Co., of Philadelphia.

South America, outside of Brazil, has no known chromite deposits

of importance. In _Colombia_, chrome ore is reported to exist near

Antioquia and chromiferous pig iron is said to have been produced by

the blast furnace near Medellin. In _Venezuela_, chrome ore is said to

occur on Coro Peninsula.

Important chromite deposits lie along the north coast of _Cuba_ in

the provinces of Camaguey and Oriente. A small deposit is found in

the northwestern part of the Province of Matanzas. The most important

deposits in Cuba are those at the Caledonia mine, south of the Bay of

Nipe and northeast of the Bethlehem Steel Co.’s Mayari iron mines.

These deposits are estimated to contain about 40,000 tons of ore in

sight. They are owned and worked by the Bethlehem Steel Co., which

began exploitation in the spring of 1918. Shipments during 1918

amounted to 8,820 tons. Next in importance to the deposits at the

Caledonia mine are those along the coast, northeast of Baracoa, known

as the Cayoguan and Potosi deposits, where about 35,000 tons of ore

is estimated to be in sight. The deposits are on the north edge of a

rugged mountain range forming the eastern end of Cuba. The Cayoguan

claims are owned by Brady interests, American, and the Potosi claims by

the Harbison-Walker Refractories Co., of Philadelphia.

In the Province of Camaguey the deposits are found northeast of the

town of Camaguey. They consist chiefly of masses of ore in residual

clay and float on the surface. The underlying rock is serpentine. The

Camaguey deposits are owned in part by Lehigh University and in part by

Cubans. The estimated reserves are 20,000 tons.

Exploitation of the chromite deposits of Cuba began in the fall of 1917

and continued during the spring and summer of 1918. Only the Caledonia

mine has produced ore. The chromite deposits are all associated with

areas of serpentine.

Chromiferous iron ores that are destined to play an important part in

the American iron and steel industry are found at Mayari, Camaguey, and

Moa, along the northeastern coast of Cuba. The reserves are measured

in hundreds of millions of tons. Only the Mayari deposits are mined at

present.

Chromite deposits were developed in the interior of _Guatemala_ in

1917 and shipments started in the autumn. The deposits were owned and

operated by the International Railways of Central America, an American

company, and are situated in the hills 100 miles inland from Puerto

Barrios. The ore is in serpentine. It is very pure and is especially

desirable for chemical purposes. The average chromic oxide content

of the shipments during 1918 was 58 per cent., thus making this the

highest grade ore that came to the American market. The ore was used by

the Grasselli Chemical Co. Because of the distance from the railroad,

these ores are very expensive to mine, and it was only on account

of the high prices paid for chromite during the war that they were

developed.

POSITION OF LEADING COMMERCIAL NATIONS

The country that leads in the manufacture of chromium products, such

as ferrochrome and chrome chemicals, is the United States. In normal

times the United States consumes more than one-third of the annual

consumption of chromite by the world. In 1913 the chromite used by

manufacturers of ferrochrome and chrome chemicals in the United States

amounted to 65,000 tons. Owing to the war, the consumption increased

markedly until 1917, when it was nearly 130,000 tons. The normal

consumption of chromite in England is about 25,000 tons and in France

approximately 35,000 tons. These amounts have not greatly increased in

recent years. Germany is an important producer of chromium products,

normally consuming 30,000 tons of chromite annually. Russia and the

former Austrian Empire used perhaps 5,000 tons each annually. Norway

and Sweden use small amounts. Russia’s consumption has been mainly in

the manufacture of chromium chemicals, and that of the former Austrian

Empire was principally for refractory purposes. In Norway and Sweden

small amounts of ferrochrome are produced.

=United States.=--The United States, although the world’s largest

consumer of chromite, is not an important producer of this mineral

in normal times. During the 30 years preceding the war, the annual

production never exceeded 4,000 long tons of crude ore, and during the

last 15 years preceding the war the largest annual production was 598

long tons, in 1909. The production in 1913 was less than 1 per cent. of

the domestic requirements.

The chromite supply of the United States has, therefore, come largely

from foreign sources, and these sources have been mainly Asia Minor,

Rhodesia, and New Caledonia. Before 1905 Turkey in Asia was the

principal source of supply. Since then, however, Rhodesia and New

Caledonia have largely replaced Turkey in the American chrome market.

Although numerous deposits of chromite occur in the western United

States and locally in the eastern states, these deposits are usually

small and scattered or of low grade. On account of their physical

character, small size, scattered occurrence, or distance from consuming

centers, domestic chromite could not be furnished to consumers in

the required grade or for the price that chromite from rich foreign

deposits could be furnished. For this reason the American chromite

deposits remained undeveloped and no ore was mined except small

quantities which were consumed for refractory purposes in neighboring

metallurgical works.

When in 1914, at the beginning of the war, the price of chromite

increased, production was immediately stimulated, this being shown by

the rapid increase in output from 591 long tons of crude ore in 1914 to

about 82,350 long tons of crude ore in 1918, equivalent to about 66,554

tons of ore on the basis of 50 per cent. chromic oxide. Even this

largely increased domestic output, however, filled only little more

than one-half of the American requirements, the total amount of chrome

ore consumed in 1918 being about 104,000 long tons on the basis of 50

per cent. chromic oxide. Had the market for chromite kept up, however,

the domestic mines would have supplied a much larger proportion of

the requirements in 1919. The consumption of chromite in the United

States in 1913 amounted to 65,000 tons of ore containing 50 per cent.

chromic oxide. From this it rose to about 127,000 tons in 1917, which

represents the maximum annual consumption thus far.

The following table shows the production and imports of chromite on the

basis of 50 per cent. chromic oxide, from 1913 to 1918, as well as the

total quantity available for consumption for these years. No chromite

is exported from the United States.

TABLE 26.--PRODUCTION AND IMPORTS OF CHROMITE, UNITED STATES, 1913-1918

----+-----------+-----------+---------------

| | |Total available

|Production | Imports |for consumption

|(long tons)|(long tons)| (long tons)

----+-----------+-----------+---------------

1913| 230 | 65,180 | 65,410

1914| 530 | 74,578 | 75,108

1915| 2,756 | 73,762 | 76,318

1916| 39,509 | 110,849 | 150,358

1917| 36,729 | 64,978 | 101,707

1918| 66,554 | 92,678 | 159,232

----+-----------+-----------+---------------

The prices paid for domestic chromite in the United States in recent

years ranged from an average of $11.19 per ton in 1913 to an average of

about $24.00 per ton in 1917.

When the need of increased shipping was felt in the latter part of

1917, steps were taken to reduce the imports of chromite from distant

countries, such as Turkey, New Caledonia, and Rhodesia, to increase

the imports from nearby sources such as Brazil, Cuba, and Canada, and

to urge the maximum production from domestic mines. As a result, the

imports of chromite from Brazil were 17,854 long tons of crude ore

and from Cuba 8,821 long tons of crude ore in 1918. The only previous

production in Cuba was 34 long tons in 1916 and 17 long tons in 1917.

Brazil had no production before 1918. The imports from Canada amounted

to 20,949 long tons of crude ore in 1918, as compared to 19,021 long

tons of crude ore in 1917, and 12,220 long tons of crude ore in 1916.

In order to reduce the importation of chromite from countries far

overseas, various restrictions were put into effect by the War Trade

Board in the early part of 1918.

The development of domestic chromite supplies means the depletion

of limited resources, high cost of production, use of lower-grade

ores, and lowered efficiency in consumption. With the free access of

high-grade foreign ores, the market for domestic ores, therefore,

disappears; and the domestic chromite-mining industry can not survive

to any large extent. If world conservation of raw materials or the

best use of the world’s resources is of chief importance, the domestic

chromite-mining industry should be allowed to decline, and cheaper

and higher-grade foreign ores should be allowed to replace domestic

chromite. Experience during the past few years has shown that the

chromite deposits of the United States, supplemented by imports from

Canada, Brazil, and Cuba, can largely supply the domestic requirements

for a limited period.

The United States controls only a small part of the chromite reserves

of the world. American firms own the principal Cuban deposits and

control the Brazilian deposits through leases. The United States is,

therefore, dependent to a large extent upon the good will of France

and England for a continuous supply of chrome ore, these two countries

jointly being largely in control of the chromite reserves of Rhodesia

and New Caledonia. Turkey controls most, if not all, of the chromite

deposits of Asia Minor, but because of their enclosed situation on the

Mediterranean, these deposits could not be relied upon as a source of

supply in time of need. The same is true of the deposits of the Ural

region in Russia.

The chief chromite-consuming firms in the United States are the

Electrometallurgical Co., probably the largest producer of ferrochrome

in the world; the Mutual Chemical Co., and the National Electrolytic

Co., large producers of chromium chemicals, and the Harbison-Walker

Refractories Co., American Refractories Co., and various steel-making

plants, users of chromite for refractory purposes.

=Great Britain.=--Before the war Great Britain consumed annually about

25,000 tons of chromite, most of it being used by Blackwell & Sons,

Ltd., for the manufacture of ferrochrome. The ferrochrome made in

England, however, is not sufficient to supply the needs of the British

steel industry, and much is imported from France.

Except for unimportant occurrences in the Shetland Islands there are no

chromite deposits in the British Isles, and Great Britain is therefore

dependent entirely upon overseas sources of supply. British colonies,

on the other hand, are rich in chromite deposits, and as long as

British ships have freedom of movement on the ocean, they will have

access to the more important chromite deposits of the world.

Owing to their richness and large size, the most important of all the

British-controlled deposits are those of Rhodesia. Only one of many

deposits in this area is being operated, and the reserves in untouched

ore bodies are undoubtedly large, comparable perhaps with those of New

Caledonia.

The production of the Rhodesian chrome mines has in recent years

averaged in the neighborhood of 60,000 tons annually or about 35 per

cent. of the world’s production, and doubtless the output could be very

greatly increased if other known deposits were developed. However,

even the present production is more than twice the actual chromite

requirements of Great Britain. These requirements, however, do not

represent the needs for metallic chromium or chromium compounds, and if

France should cease to supply Great Britain with ferrochrome, a much

larger amount of the raw material, chromite, would be necessary for the

English steel industry.

Besides the chromite deposits of South Africa, chromite deposits of

importance are found in other British colonies, notably in British

India and Canada. Amounts of chromite varying from 2,000 tons to 10,000

tons have been produced annually in British India for many years,

coming mainly from Baluchistan, in the northwestern part, but a small

production has come also from Mysore, in the southern part. In early

years, India furnished a more important part of the world’s supply of

chromite than at present. Transportation is a serious difficulty in the

mining of these deposits and when New Caledonian and Rhodesian ores

became developed, the Indian ores dropped in importance.

The Canadian deposits, while of considerable extent, and having ready

accessibility to eastern American markets, have not been extensively

or continuously mined, on account of their low-grade character. By

concentration, a medium high-grade product can be obtained, but

concentration methods are expensive and bring the cost of the material

up to such an extent that it can not compete with other ores now on the

market. Thus, the cost of producing both Indian and Canadian ores is

such that under normal conditions it is difficult to find a market for

them, but in case of necessity, a considerable tonnage can be supplied

from these sources.

Other British colonies in which deposits of chromite exist are New

South Wales, Tasmania, and New Zealand. As far as known, the deposits

in these countries are small and only those of the first have furnished

a small production.

Besides controlling chromite deposits in many parts of the world

through her colonial possessions, Great Britain controls deposits

through British firms with foreign possessions. Thus, the Chrome

Co., Ltd., of mixed British and French interests, controls not only

the Rhodesian chromite output but also owns and controls most of the

important New Caledonian mines.

Great Britain has in the past received most of her supplies of chromite

from Rhodesia, New Caledonia, and Turkey. Although more than enough

chromite is produced in Rhodesia to supply the British needs, England

has allowed most of the Rhodesian ore to be exported to other countries

and has imported foreign ore for part of her own needs. Probably the

largest part of the Rhodesian output before the war went to the United

States. Much of the ore consumed in England has come from Turkey, where

English firms have been interested in chromite mining for many years.

Most of the Indian output probably has been used in Great Britain, but

a part has gone to France.

=France.=--A few deposits of chromite are known in France, but they

are of no importance commercially. France, therefore, like England,

is entirely dependent upon overseas sources for her chromite supply.

Unlike England, however, France has only one colony, New Caledonia,

containing important chromite deposits; but luckily this colony

contains enough to make it one of the world’s principal sources of

chromite.

Although the Chrome Co., Ltd., which controls the principal New

Caledonian chromite deposits and is the largest shipper, represents

both English and French capital, France through political means can

control the output of chromite from the island. While in the past

probably the major part of the chromite used in France has come from

this source, France has also used Rhodesian and Turkish ores and

probably Russian ores to a considerable extent, and much New Caledonian

ore has gone to Germany, the United States and Great Britain.

The principal French firms manufacturing ferrochrome are the Société

Electrometallurgique Française, at La Praz; Société La New Metallurgie,

at Giffre; Société Anonyme Electrometallurgique, at Albertville;

Keller, Leleux et Cie, at Livet; Société Electrometallurgique de Saint

Beron, at Saint Beron; Ch. Betrolus, at Bellegarde; and Rochette

Frères, at Epierre.

=Germany.=--Except for unimportant low-grade deposits in Silesia,

Germany has no chromite supplies within her borders. As a user of

chromite Germany ranks in importance with France, most of the ore

consumed being used in the manufacture of ferrochrome, the principal

manufacturers of which have been the Krupp works. Chrome chemicals are

also made in abundance, however. None of Germany’s former colonies

is known to have chromite deposits except Togoland, and the Togoland

deposits are undeveloped and are believed to be unimportant.

In the past, Germany has received chromite from New Caledonia,

Rhodesia, Turkey, Greece, and probably Russia. Because of the long rail

haul from Russia and the poor state of development of the industry

in Turkey, the ores from these two countries were, in the years

immediately preceding the war, being largely replaced by ores from

overseas. The four large chromite-consuming countries have, therefore,

all been looking mainly to New Caledonia and Rhodesia for their sources

of supply.

During the war, when overseas chromite was not available, Germany was

enabled by her relations with Turkey to obtain chromite from Asia

Minor, and probably from chromite mines in Serbia, Hungary, Bosnia, and

Herzegovina. Thus in time of need, when the usual overseas sources of

supply were cut off, Germany, through her relations with neighboring

countries, was able to obtain by land sufficient chromite to supply her

ordnance requirements. Had the war continued Germany would doubtless

have developed the chromite resources of the Urals, and those, together

with the deposits of Asia Minor, even in their present state of

development, could have kept Germany supplied indefinitely.

It is probable that German control became important in the mines

of Asia Minor during the war. By relatively small improvements in

transportation facilities, such as building branch railroad lines

to the principal deposits, the chromite mines of Asia Minor might be

rejuvenated to such an extent as to enable the ores to compete with

Rhodesian and New Caledonian ore and to place them again among the

world’s large producers. The deposits are large and the reserves rank

in importance with those of Rhodesia and New Caledonia.

=Russia.=--Russia is independent as far as her requirements of chromite

are concerned. Out of her production of about 20,000 tons annually,

the domestic industry consumes less than one-fourth and the rest is

available for export to nations less favored with chromite resources.

Most of the chromite used in Russia goes into the manufacture of chrome

chemicals. The Russian bichromate works at Elabouga, east of Kazan,

established in 1892, have consumed about 2,000 tons of ore annually.

SUMMARY

The political and commercial control of the principal chromite deposits

of the world is summarized in the following table:

TABLE 27.--POLITICAL AND COMMERCIAL CONTROL OF CHROMITE DEPOSITS

Political Predominant

Country control commercial control

New Caledonia French French-British

Rhodesia British British

Asia Minor Turkish Turkish

Ural Mountains, Russia Russian Russian-British

Greece Grecian Uncertain

Serbia Serbian Uncertain

India British Probably British

Canada British United States-Canadian

United States United States United States

Brazil Brazilian United States

Cuba Cuban United States

Japan Japanese Japanese

Austria-Hungary Austrian Uncertain

Guatemala Guatemalan United States

Great Britain and France produce in their colonial possessions chromite

enough for their own needs and for export, but the United States,

the world’s largest consumer, must depend, except in time of extreme

emergency, upon imports, mainly from New Caledonia and Rhodesia.

Various countries have from time to time played important rôles in

supplying the world’s demand for chromite. One country after another

has been displaced, as cheaper or better grades of chromite came into

the market. At times these changes were caused by the finding of larger

bodies of higher-grade ores than had previously been mined, and at

other times they were caused by cheaply transported ores replacing ores

inconveniently situated with reference to centers of consumption.

Thus, at the beginning of the nineteenth century and up to about

1830, the Ural Mountain region of Russia supplied the major part of

the world’s requirements for chromite, which were small. About 1830,

important discoveries of chromite were made in the eastern United

States, particularly in Maryland, and the United States soon displaced

Russia as the leading producer of chromite. After this, for many years,

the United States continued to lead in chromite production until about

1870, when the domestic deposits gradually approached exhaustion and

important deposits discovered in European Turkey and Asia Minor began

to be extensively developed.

Asia Minor was the principal chromite-producing country from about

1870 until about the beginning of the twentieth century. The deposits

continued to be worked fairly steadily on account of their richness and

large size, although they were inconveniently situated with reference

to transportation. Only certain deposits, such as those in the Macri

and Alexandretta regions, were so near to the coast that the ore could

be carried on muleback or by camel to the shipping ports. From the

larger deposits, such as Daghardi, the ore had to be transported by

animals to railroad stations, often a distance of many miles, and then

by rail to the coast. Because of these difficulties, Turkish ore was

largely replaced by ore from the important New Caledonian and Rhodesian

deposits as soon as those were developed.

In New Caledonia labor is cheap and the deposits are all near the

coast. By means of sailing vessels and tramp steamers which charge low

rates and often require such heavy materials as chromite for ballast,

this ore can be delivered to points of consumption at a relatively

small cost. The Rhodesian chromite deposits are not as accessible from

the coast, but they are large and rich and the rail freight rates to

the shipping port are exceptionally low. For this reason, Rhodesian ore

has been able to successfully compete in the market with New Caledonian

ore, and these two sources have, therefore, in recent years, jointly

supplied most of the requirements of the principal nations for chromite.

During the war, because of abnormal conditions arising from the

shortage of shipping facilities, there was considerable uncertainty

as to whether it would be possible to supply American consumers of

chromite with imported ores. Under the stimulus of much higher prices,

the production of chromite in the United States increased from 255 long

tons of crude chromite in 1913, to about 82,350 tons in 1918, mainly

from California, Washington and Oregon. This production was larger

than the annual production of crude ore from any single source (except

82,910 tons from New Caledonia in 1906) since the chromite-mining

industry began. This production, of course, could not be continued

without a rapid depletion of American chromite reserves, and does not

represent a normal development.

Political and commercial geology and the world's mineral resources · 第 5 / 32 章