Third. The papers can combine in a sort of trust. Take the Theatrical

Syndicate, for instance, whose theatres could not be kept open a week

without newspaper publicity. The Theatrical Syndicate's policy seems to

be to single out any paper that becomes too critical and give it an

absent-advertisement treatment. At the present moment this medicine is

being prescribed in several of our large cities. But let all the

publishers form a publishers' trade union as it were, and whenever an

advertisement is withdrawn, appoint a committee of investigation, and

if the committee reports that the withdrawal of the advertisement was

done for any improper reason, then let all the papers refuse to print

an advertisement of the play, or allow their critics to mention it

until the matter is satisfactorily adjusted. This would bring the

advertisers to their knees in a moment.

The papers have the whip hand if they will only combine, but they are

all so jealous of one another that probably any real combination is a

long way off. Still there are indications of a gentleman's agreement in

the air, for all other interests are combining and they will be forced

to follow suit.

And what will the public do then, poor thing? A newspaper trust will

certainly be as inimical to the public welfare as any other combination

doing business in the fear of the Sherman law. Indeed it would be more

dangerous, for a periodical trust would practically control the

diffusion of intelligence, and that no self-respecting democracy would

or should allow. But this is borrowing trouble from the future.

Fourth and last. We come back to the old, old remedy, which if

sincerely applied would solve most all the ills of society. I refer to

personal integrity, to character. Despite what may be said to the

contrary, integrity is the only thing in the newspaper profession, as

in life itself, that really counts.

The great journalists of the past, whatever their personal

idiosyncrasies, have all been men of integrity; the great journalists

of to-day are of the same sterling mould; and the journalistic giants

of to-morrow--and the journalists of the future will be giants--must

also be men of inflexible character.

There has never been a time in all history when so many and so

important things were waiting to be done as to-day. The newest school

of sociology tells us that the human race in its spiral progress onward

and upward through sweat and blood, misery and strife, has at last

reached the point where, emerging from the control of the blind forces

of an inexorable environment, it is about to take its destiny into its

own control and actually shape its future. From now on, evolution is to

be a psychical rather than a physical process. The world is on the

threshold of a new era. We see the first faint dawn of universal peace

and of the brotherhood of man.

Fortunate that editor whose privilege it is to share in pointing out

the way.

_The Riverside Press_

CAMBRIDGE . MASSACHUSETTS

U . S . A

End of Project Gutenberg's Commercialism and Journalism, by Hamilton Holt

Commercialism and Journalism · 第 3 / 3 段