CHAPTER X.

NEW YORK. 1850.

"THE ROCHESTER KNOCKINGS AT BARNUM'S HOTEL"--HARD WORK--OUR

VISITORS--A POISONED BOUQUET--HAIR OF THE EMPEROR NAPOLEON I.--HAIR

OF JOHN C. CALHOUN--INVESTIGATION AT RESIDENCE OF REV. RUFUS W.

GRISWOLD, BY THE LEADING LITERARY CELEBRITIES OF NEW YORK.

FIRST VISIT TO NEW YORK.

We arrived in New York City on June 4, 1850, and had engaged rooms at

Barnum's Hotel, corner of Broadway and Maiden Lane. (This proprietor

must not be confounded with the great showman of that name.)

Horace Greeley was our first caller. He advised us to charge five

dollars admission fee. I told him that would be altogether too much; but

he feared greatly for our safety, and thought this exorbitant sum would

keep the rabble away. I told him I thought it decidedly better to follow

the directions of the Spirits, and trust in Providence for protection

and success. He announced our arrival in the _Tribune_, and published

our rules of order. The editors of the _Tribune_ and many other papers

were in our rooms daily. Mr. Ripley used to say to us: "Ladies, you are

the lions of New York." Mary Taylor, in a Broadway theatre, sweetly sang

"The Rochester Knockings at Barnum's Hotel," as a popular topic of the

day. Many things in stores, on sidewalks, and newspaper advertisements,

were paraded and labelled with the words "Rochester Knockings."

What a time, to be sure, we had of it during that first visit, of

nearly three months, to the great metropolis! Our party was seven in

number. Our parlor was a large room opposite to the main one of the

hotel, from which it was separated by a wide corridor. A long table with

thirty seats occupied the centre of it, and we gave three receptions

each day, for which our advertised hours were: 10 to 12 A.M., 3 to 5

P.M., and 8 to 10 P.M.; but the midday meeting would often lengthen out

till we had barely time to get ready for dinner, and the evening one to

midnight. The public parlors served as ante-rooms, in which visitors

waited their turns to be admitted by one of our attendant gentlemen.

Private sittings were often extorted from us by importunity, which

would begin at the earliest hours before breakfast. With what degree of

exhaustion of muscles, nerves, mind and spirit, we would reach our beds

(in our rooms on the floor above), where sleep was often slow to come to

our over-strained systems, may be imagined by my readers. The mere

pressure upon us of the three successive crowds would, alone, have been

a strain hard to bear; but every individual had his or her colloquies

to be held with their respective Spirit friends. The burthen of it fell

upon us all, but most heavily upon our dear mother, who took it so

deeply to heart when she knew we were so unjustly suspected and so

severely tested. She was of course always present with us, but only as a

spectator and for protection. Ministers of all denominations, members of

all professions, legal, medical, literary, and commercial, were among

our guests, and many of them were frequent visitors. The occasions were

rare when the slightest want of courtesy, respect, and kindness occurred

to wound or displease us; and the only thing approaching an indignity

we had to complain of among ourselves, was the frequency with which

committees of ladies would retire with us to disrobe and reclothe us,

the holding of our feet, etc.

Among the thousands of strangers who streamed through our rooms, I, of

course, could know or remember the names of but few individuals; and

many an one had his or her designation by which we used to recognize

them, as--the White Spirit, or the Black, or the Gray, the Count, the

Slick Wig, the Old Oriental, the Hippopotamus, etc., etc. By the way,

the Count was also an elderly gentleman with white hair and angelic

eyes, a foreigner, who at parting made me a present of a set of old

china of extreme rarity, for which I have since refused a dealer's offer

of a thousand dollars, and which I still employ at parties and fêtes,

and particular occasions, and always with a kind thought of the dear old

donor. The summer season of travel, of course, brought many Southerners

to our rooms, as well as visitors from other cities of the Union.

We again passed through an ordeal of special investigation by a large

committee of the first men of New York, in scientific and literary, as

well as social distinction, which took place at the residence of the

Rev. Rufus W. Griswold, for some account of which, and the signal

triumph in which it resulted, I refer to a letter which will be found

further on, and which was extensively republished.

Only one very painful thing occurred: an anonymous present made to me of

a large, superb bouquet of flowers, the smelling of which nearly cost

me my life. I was thought to be at death's door; and a week had passed

before I fully recovered from the effect. Spirits told us that it had

proceeded from the malignity of a hostile quarter, and that the bouquet

was poisoned.

I have always had a peculiar sensitiveness to poison; and could not

even now, in the open air, pass near to certain growing plants, such as

poison ivy, without suffering sensibly from their vicinity.

There was another occasion on which evil was not only intended, but

attempted, by some who falsely believed they were doing God service by

breaking up the "pestilent Rochester knockings." We, too, had our case

of a "prophet" (Isaiah) sent to curse, but who remained to bless.

Our "prophet," of whom this was true, was none other than the famous

Captain I. Rynders, well known as the Captain of the Empire Club--a

Democratic party organization of "fighting men," the counterpoise to a

corresponding body on the other side of politics. These rival corps had,

originally, for their business the breaking up of the meetings of the

adverse party, or to defend those of their own party against similar

attacks from the opposite fighting corps. Captain Rynders, though a

rather slender man, was one of such pluck, energy, and resolution, that

his very name came to represent a real power in New York. His politics,

in which he was very zealous, made him (as most men of that day were, on

both sides) very hostile to "the Abolitionists," many a meeting of

whom the Empire Club had broken up after the most summary of fashions,

namely, through windows as well as doors. One day three men, one of

them of Herculean proportions, with his shirt-collar wide open, sailor

fashion, on a brown sunburnt neck, entered our parlor, after payment of

their regular fee outside, and took their seats together; the Hercules

next to me. His appearance was every way formidable. A certain slight

commotion was manifest in the company on their entrance. I soon received

from three different friends in the room (Mr. Greeley, George Ripley,

and another) little billets warning me against "the most dangerous man

in New York"--whose appearance "portended evil," and telling me to be

"extremely careful" of all I should say and do, etc. One lady bent over

me from behind, handed me a bit of paper which spoke of "black danger

clouds," and a row as being imminent from "those men," and then made

her escape into one of the more remote parlors of the hotel. But they

sat quietly as observers. There were several clergymen in the company,

one of them being the celebrated Dr. Phelps, of Stratford, Conn. There

were at the table also two elderly, tall, thin, and pale Quaker maiden

ladies, a little ghostly perhaps in appearance, one of whom presently

addressed to the Spirits the question, "Which is the more correct, the

Bible or Andrew Jackson Davis's Revelations?" To this came many raps,

which were differently understood around the table, according to the

various opinions. It made quite a sensation. I rose and said that those

raps were not an answer to the question, but a call for the alphabet,

which I proceeded to repeat aloud as usual. The answer returned was:

"The Bible contains many true and beautiful things, and so also does

Davis's Revelations," a reply which Dr. Phelps considered a good and

wise one. I presently invited one of my three neighbors (not the

Herculean one) to the door, which I opened, and he was made to hear loud

rappings on the wooden panels, and also on the marble flooring.

My real object was to conciliate him as being one of the party of

"danger clouds," though he was not the one who had been the object of my

terror. "What is the meaning of this?" he said. "Have _you_ anything to

do with the Rochester knockings? I thought those two white old maids

were the ones. I was sent here by a religious society to break it all

up, and drive it out of New York, as I did last week with Fred. Douglass

and Julia Griffith, and their sets of Abolitionists." I told him he had

been very wrong in doing so, and that those ladies were strangers here,

as he and his friends were. "What, are _you_ the Rochester knockers?"

"Yes." "Why, I thought you were older. Ain't you afraid of me? What,

these children!" "No, I am not a bit afraid of you," I repeated, though

in my secret heart I was dreadfully afraid of the other man. "Well, I am

Captain Rynders--haven't you heard of me?" "Yes, I have, but I am not

afraid of you." He took a seat at the table, and I invited him to ask

some questions of some friends of his in the Spirit world. He asked a

brother of his where he had died--"In California," was the correct

reply. "Of what disease?" To this also he got a reply, which, with a

strong blow of his fist on the table, he admitted to be correct.

Captain Rynders was now our friend, and a good and gallant one he

proved. He made the _Herald_ publish a long account of it in our favor;

the only occasion of its doing anything of the kind. He said that nobody

should molest us; that he saw no reason why it should be done, and

he emphasized this with a strong blow upon the table. He was indeed

surprised that _we_ were the mediums; he had supposed them to be the old

Quaker women over there (alas, poor good souls!). My relations soon

became equally comfortable with his big friend also, of whom I had been

so afraid. A letter for me was brought in and laid on the table between

him and me. I noticed that he seemed to observe the direction on it

somewhat closely. I presently handed the letter over to mother, saying,

"Here is a letter from our dear friend Maria Rogers." Said my big

neighbor, "Why, where did you ever know Maria Rogers?" "In Albany, at

the Delavan House, where her husband had some business position. She is

one of the sweetest women I ever knew, and I love her dearly. She was

also very beautiful." "She is all that you say," was his reply, "and she

is my own darling sister." The letter proved to be an invitation to

spend Sunday with her at the Oceanic House. I had no further fear of her

big brother, who, together with Captain Rynders, would certainly have

pitched all the rest of the company out of the window in our defence,

had it been necessary. Such was the conversion of our "prophet," from

the cursing for which he had been commissioned, to blessings. I have

since been assured by those who knew him, that Captain Rynders was

really a good man at heart, with other manly qualities besides his

courage, notwithstanding his animosity against the Abolitionists of that

period, and others against whom the energies of the Empire Club had been

directed by his party. I have some reason to believe that he has been a

happier man from that time than before. I was sincerely glad to see him

a few weeks ago, when he called on me, by my request, to compare notes

upon our reminiscences of this adventure, and I was indeed astonished to

hear so young a looking man avow that he was now eighty years of age.

At all our séances the general character of the manifestations was

that all present heard the explosive sounds or "knockings," whose

significance resided in their correspondence with the letters of the

alphabet; while each in succession had the opportunity of communicating

with his own friends in the spirit life. Nor do I believe that a single

person passed through the experience of one of those meetings who was

not satisfied, in his own sincere mind, that we had nothing of physical

relation to their production, and that no conceivable mundane means

could have produced them.

Though in our own domestic experience remarkable phenomena of the

physical order had often been produced by the Spirits, such, for

instance, as the rising of objects in the air, including our own

persons, etc., yet nothing of this kind occurred at these meetings,

beyond the phenomenon of the sitters being touched, sometimes

caressingly, by invisible hands, or having their garments pulled, or

their chairs or the table moved--which were frequent experiences to our

visitors.

I cannot afford the space for numerous individual incidents of interest

which occurred at those meetings, but will mention one, which is not

likely to be forgotten by some of the witnesses to it, who may perhaps

read this page. A stranger came one day, of evident distinction and

advanced years, French, though speaking English; I have a vague

impression that he was a diplomatist. He had with him a friend. He

produced a folded paper or envelope, and asked if the Spirits could tell

him what it contained. The answer promptly came, "A piece of the hair of

the Emperor Napoleon." This naturally arrested the eager attention of

all the company. I trembled with doubt and fear of a failure. The old

gentleman opened the paper and held up a small piece of hair, and, with

tears in his eyes and quivering lips, said--either he had been one of

those who accompanied Napoleon on his voyage to St. Helena, or that he

was a friend of the physician who had accompanied him. After this

lapse of time I am not certain which, but something was said about the

physician. He told how on an occasion of his hair being cut by the

barber, the fallen pieces had been religiously gathered up, and this was

one of them. Turning to his friend who had come with him, he said, "I

did not need this evidence, but this test is evidently intended for

you;" and then explained that in the morning his friend, who was an

entire unbeliever, had said, in reference to their intended visit to us,

that if we were subjected to that test, and if it should be told what

were the contents of the envelope, he would be a believer too. I

remember that Mr. Greeley and Mr. Ripley, of the _Tribune_, were

present. If this should fall under the eye of any survivors of that

scene, I should be pleased to hear from them. None present can have

forgotten it.

There were a number of somewhat similar cases of treasured locks of hair

being thus identified by those who had worn them in life, but though

there are many whose hair is thus preserved by faithful memories, there

has been but one Napoleon the Great.

However, I will further add that if there was but one Napoleon I., there

was also but one John C. Calhoun. One day a Southern gentleman was at

the table, and, having heard of the above incident respecting the great

Emperor, produced and laid down his pocket-book, asking to know one

thing it contained. "Hair of John C. Calhoun," was the reply. He

acknowledged its truth, and exhibited the lock.

During this our first visit to New York occurred another "investigation"

by a number of the most eminent literary and commercial gentlemen of

that city, at the residence of the Rev. Rufus W. Griswold. It included

such men as J. Fenimore Cooper, George Bancroft, Rev. Dr. Hawks, Dr.

John W. Francis, William Cullen Bryant, Nathaniel P. Willis, Dr. Marcy,

and others. It had its origin with the Dr. C. D. Griswold, M.D. (our

friend at Rochester, mentioned on a former page), who came down to New

York expressly to propose it to us, telling us that the high position of

his brother, Rufus W., would enable him to unite for that purpose the

best elements which the great metropolis could afford. We were only too

glad to comply with so kind and friendly a suggestion. In the wilderness

of my papers I do not find the full records of that interesting

occasion, of which no full formal report was ever issued; but I well

remember that it was highly satisfactory to ourselves and our friends.

All the testings desired, such as making us stand on cushions, etc.,

were exhausted. I recollect that Fenimore Cooper addressed an immense

number of questions to Spirits (my impression is a hundred and fifty),

and received correct replies. I find among some newspaper scraps a long

editorial in a Sunday paper, by its junior editor, written in the full

vein of hostile persiflage usual at that time with the press, dependent

for existence on its subscription lists, the following as its

conclusion:

"Since writing the above, we have read in the _Tribune_ an account of an

interview between the Spirits' interpreters and Mr. J. Fenimore Cooper,

Mr. George Bancroft, Rev. Dr. Hawks, Dr. Francis, Mr. Wm. Cullen Bryant,

Mr. N. P. Willis, Dr. Marcy, and other literary celebrities, at the

rooms of the Rev. Doctor Griswold. The responses given to several of

these gentlemen, as reported in the _Tribune_, were most extraordinary;

and yet--infidel that we are!--these replies have not shaken our

obstinate incredulity.

"Our senses are the only witnesses we will consent to trust in relation

to phenomena which, if really supernatural, would upset, among other

things, the Christian Religion,[8] and the verdict of our senses upon

all the performances which have come under our observation."

[8] This is a mistake or misrepresentation frequent with those who

regard dogmatic "orthodoxy" (according to the title it claims) as

the true and the only "Christian Religion." All Spirits indeed

reject the dogmas of the eternal hell-fire, of total depravity, of

vicarious atonement, of anything but One Supreme Spirit or God,

and of the literal plenary inspiration of the Bible; but a vast

body of the most enlightened Spiritualists (I believe the bulk of

them) devoutly cherish _the Christianity taught, lived, and died

for by Christ himself_; and a pamphlet by a well-known and popular

Spiritualist is rightly entitled "Christ the Corner-Stone of

Spiritualism."--ED.

Any reader desirous of examining the _Tribune's_ report above alluded

to, can easily find it in the files of that paper for 1850. I content

myself, for brevity's sake, with the following extract from Mr. Capron's

volume on "Spiritualism: Its Facts and Fanaticisms," etc. (1855), page

172:

"But curiosity had so far obtained the mastery of bigoted opposition as

to lead many of the most eminent men of the city to give the subject a

fair investigation. The result was, as elsewhere, the making of many

converts; and these were not from among men of inferior intellects or of

unbalanced minds.

"Not long after the arrival of the mediums, a number of literary

gentlemen assembled at the house of Rev. Dr. Griswold, an Episcopalian

clergyman, in Broadway. Neither of the sisters Fox had ever been at the

house before, and the meeting was called for the purpose of testing, as

far as they were able, the validity of these alleged manifestations.

Among the company were J. Fenimore Cooper, the novelist, Mr. George

Bancroft, the historian, Rev. Dr. Hawks, Dr. J. W. Francis, Dr. Marcy,

Mr. N. P. Willis, Mr. Wm. Cullen Bryant, the poet, and Mr. Bigelow, of

the _Evening Post_, Mr. Richard B. Kimball, Mr. H. Tuckerman, and Gen.

Lyman. These gentlemen were well known throughout the country, and the

report was well calculated to carry much weight with it, let it be on

which side it would. The result was highly satisfactory to the mediums

and their friends. On this occasion Mrs. Fox and her three daughters

were present. Mr. Tuckerman was among the first to interrogate the

Spirits. Among his questions were the following in regard to an

individual whose name he had not spoken, but had simply in his mind:

"'Did he live in New York?' No answer. 'In Baltimore?' 'In Cambridge?'

'In Boston?'--Three distinct raps, which is the sign of an affirmative

answer. A negative reply is indicated by silence. Mr. T. continued, 'Was

he a lawyer?' 'A merchant?' 'A physician?' 'A clergyman?' Knocks. 'Was

he an Episcopalian?' 'A Presbyterian?' 'A Unitarian?'--going over

the names of the principal sects. No answer. At the suggestion of a

gentleman, Mr. T. asked 'Was he a Christian?' Knocks. Mr. T. then asked

the age of the person in a series of tens. 'Was he twenty years old at

the time of his death?' 'Was he thirty?' 'Forty?' 'Fifty?' 'Sixty?'

Knocks. 'Has he left a family?' Knocks. 'Children?' Knocks. 'Five?'

'Three?' 'Two?' Knocks. 'Did he die in Boston?' 'In Philadelphia?' 'In

Albany?' 'In Northampton?' 'In Bennington?' Knocks. 'Did he die of

consumption?' 'Of fever?' 'Of cholera?' 'Of old age?' Knocks.

"The person in Mr. Tuckerman's mind was the late Dr. William Ellery

Channing, the eminent and liberal Unitarian divine. He lived in Boston,

and died in Bennington, Vt., while on a journey.

"Dr. Francis having fixed in his mind the name of an individual, the

'rapping' spelled out B-u-r--when several of the company exclaimed,

spontaneously, 'Robert Burns.' This was the true answer; and after an

interesting interview with the bard of Scotia, the doctor declined

asking any more questions.

"Mr. James Fenimore Cooper then asked, 'Is the person I inquire about

a relative?' 'Yes,' was at once indicated by the knocks. 'A near

relative?' 'Yes.' 'A man?' No answer. 'A woman?' 'Yes.' 'A daughter?' 'A

mother?' 'A wife?' No answer. 'A sister?' 'Yes.' Mr. C. then asked the

number of years since her death. Fifty knocks were given, and the number

unanimously so announced by the company. Mr. C. now asked, 'Did she die

of consumption?' and naming several diseases to which no answer was

given. 'Did she die by accident?' 'Yes.' 'Was she killed by lightning?'

'Was she shot?' 'Was she lost at sea?' 'Did she fall from a carriage?'

'Was she thrown from a horse?' 'Yes.'

"Mr. Cooper here discontinued his investigations, and informed the

company that just fifty years ago that present month he had a sister

thrown from a horse and killed, and that all the answers had been

strictly correct."

Mr. Ripley, one of the editors of the _Tribune_, a man of candor and

great intelligence, drew up the report of the whole proceedings, of

which the above is but a short extract, and in conclusion he says:

"The evening was now far advanced, and it was not thought desirable to

continue our colloquies any further. At the suggestion of several

gentlemen, the ladies removed from the sofa, where they had sat during

the evening, and remained standing in another part of the room. The

knockings were now heard on the doors, at both ends of the room,

producing a vibration on the panels which was felt by every one who

touched them. Different gentlemen stood on the outside and inside of

the door at the same time, when loud knockings were heard on the side

opposite to where they stood. The ladies were at such a distance from

the door, in both cases, as to render no countenance to the idea that

the sounds were produced by any direct communication with them. They

now went into a parlor under the room in which the party was held,

accompanied by several gentlemen, and the sounds were then produced

with great distinctness, causing sensible vibrations in the sofa, and

apparently coming from a thick hearth-rug before the fire-place, as well

as from other quarters of the room.

"Such are the most important facts which we can recall of the

manifestations of the evening. We believe we have stated them without

any coloring whatever, as they appeared to every one present; but, with

regard to their origin or their nature, we are as much in the dark as

any of our readers."

I will add to the above but a few lines. After Fenimore Cooper, and his

responsive friends in the Spirit life, had occupied the floor, so to

speak, for a long time, calls upon him began to arise as to whether any

of his answers were correct. Of course he alone could know, since they

were in the form of raps. Old Dr. Francis, who had sat with his chin

resting on his big cane, and his eyes intently fixed on Mr. Cooper, as

had been the eyes of all the company, began knocking impatiently on

the floor, which example was followed by others, as in the case of an

impatient audience at a theatre. At last Mr. Cooper gave satisfaction to

their curiosity, now wound up to a high pitch, by saying: "Gentlemen,

every single answer has been correct." This was of course no small

relief and satisfaction to us.

And it was a still greater satisfaction when, after his death in

September of the following year, I received a visit from Mr. Cooper's

nephew, with a note from the great novelist, one of the last things

written by his prolific pen, and a message from him on his death-bed,

substantially as follows: "Tell the Fox family I bless them. I have been

made happy through them. They have prepared me for this hour."

The Missing Link in Modern Spiritualism · 第 10 / 33 章