CHAPTER V

_THE DAUPHINE_

_Wednesday, 16th of May 1770 to Tuesday, 10th of May 1774_

WHEN the mock-marriage was over and the night passed, and when, with the

Thursday morning, the long routine that was to be her life opened upon

her, the child could watch with less excitement and with less illusion

the nature of that new world. Her vivacity was not diminished, but her

spirit immediately adopted a permanent attitude of astonished

observation towards emotions and conventions whose general scheme she

could not grasp at all. Daily the incidents which passed before her

while they violently moved also repelled her senses; she was reconciled

to them only by their repetition.

Versailles was the more bewildering to her because, in all its

externals, it was the world she had known from her birth. The French

cooking, architecture, dress, and social manner had for a century

imposed themselves upon the palaces of Europe; but the French mind, now

first in contact with her own, remained to her a marvellous and

unpleasing revelation, which, even after years of regarding its energy,

still shocked her.

There was a ball that night. She danced with her bright-eyed and tall

young brother-in-law. At what he was sneering she could not understand,

nor even if the boy’s expression was a sneer: she knew that it was

strange. She did not notice the absence of half the Court; she did not

know that her mother’s request for Precedence to be given to the

Princesses of Lorraine had raised this silent French storm; had she been

told she would not have comprehended. The extreme and individual French

jealousies, the furious discussions that underlie the united formality

of French etiquette, were alien and inhuman to her German breeding; for

active and living, almost Southern, as was this Viennese girl, she

enjoyed to the end the good simplicity of her mother’s race. She danced

with young Chartres. If something in him chilled her, she could not

divine what it was in that character which even then seemed closed, and

which later was to make him vote her husband’s death, and sit at wine in

his palace while she sat a prisoner and widowed in her prison at hand.

For days the feasts continued and for days her unexpected experiences of

persons and of a strange nationality were relieved by pageants and

popular clamours which, at her age, could distract her from weary

questions. It was at one of these that there sounded once more that note

of disaster which came at rhythmic intervals across her life and

continued to come until a climax closed it. She had leave to go with her

aunts, the King’s daughters, by night with a small escort to see the

public holiday in Paris which celebrated her marriage. She was to go

without ceremony, not to be recognised, merely to satisfy a child’s

curiosity for a spectacle in her own honour. As the coach came up the

river road towards what is now the Trocadero hill she could already see

far off the flash of the rockets, and she heard with increasing pleasure

the roar of a great crowd met to do her honour. As she neared the great

square which is called to-day the Place de la Concorde she was

disappointed, as children are, to see that the coach was late; the great

scaffolding and final set-piece in which her initials were interlaced

with those of the Dauphin was sputtering out in the inglorious end of

fireworks—but something more intimate to her (had she known herself) and

worse than her childish disappointment had marked the moment of her

arrival. The coach was stopped abruptly, the guards closed round it, and

it was turned back at once towards Versailles. As it rumbled through the

darkness more quickly than it had come, she seemed to hear in the

distant clamour both fierceness and terror. It was a sound of panic. She

heard the news whispered respectfully and fearfully to her aunts during

a halt upon the way. Perhaps they thought her too young to be told. She

complained as she went that the truth was concealed from her, and when

they reached the palace late that night she was crying. Next day the

news was public, and she learned that after this first rejoicing, in

what was to be her capital city, there had been crushed and maimed and

killed many hundreds of her people; it proved one of those misfortunes

which, as much from their circumstance as from their magnitude, remain

fixed for years in the memory of a nation, and the day on which she

learned it was the last of the month of her wedding.

During the summer that followed this presage she learnt the whole lesson

of Versailles. She was still a child. Mercy still wrote of her to her

mother in a tone which, for all its conventional respect, was a tone now

of irritation against, now of amused admiration for, a child. She had

her daily childish lessons with the Abbé Vermond and daily exasperated

him by her distractions. She still wrote painfully her childish letters

to Maria Theresa, took her little childish donkey-rides, and was

strongly impressed, as a child would be, by those of her elders who

alone could show some authority over her—Mesdames, her husband’s aunts.

She was growing fast; and there is nothing more touching in the minute

record of her life than the notes of her increasing stature during this

year, so oddly does the nursery detail contrast with the splendour of

her place in Europe and the titles of her rôle.

She was still a child; but as her fifteenth birthday approached and was

passed she had learnt (while it wearied her) the full etiquette of her

part, and she had begun, though imperfectly, to recognise what were the

politics of a Court and in what manner intrigue would approach her: how

to avoid or master it she discovered neither then nor at any later time

throughout her adolescence and maturity.

With the advent of winter and its long and brilliant festivals, another

thing which she had begun to comprehend in the palace became for her a

fixed object of hatred: the position and influence of the Du Barry.

She knew now what this official place was which the Favourite held. Her

disgust for so much regulation and pomp in such an office would in any

case have been strong, for Marie Antoinette came from a Court where the

sovereign was herself a woman and where all this side of men’s lives was

left to the suburbs: that disgust would in any case have been sharp, for

she was too young and too utterly inexperienced to be indulgent; it

would in any case have been increased by a sense of isolation, for all

around this German child were the French gentry taking for granted that

everything touching a King of France, from his vices to his foibles,

must be dressed up in a national and symbolic magnificence. Her disgust

would, I say, in any case have risen against so much complexity allied

to so much strength, but that disgust turned into an active and violent

repulsion when she saw the Du Barry not only, as it were, official but

also exercising power. This to her very young and passionate instincts,

whether of sex, of rank, or of policy, was intolerable; it was the more

intolerable in that the Du Barry’s first exercise of power happened to

go counter to interests which the Dauphine regarded rather too

emphatically as those of Austria and of her family.

The chief Minister of the Crown, the Duc de Choiseul, kindly, sceptical,

well-bred and rather hollow, had been, if not the mere creation or

discovery, at any rate the ally of Madame de Pompadour. Madame de

Pompadour had been a statesman herself: Choiseul had perpetually

supported her and she him, more especially when he ran in the rut of the

time, showed himself conventionally anti-Christian, and (having been

educated by the Jesuits) was drawn into the intrigue by which that order

was suppressed. He had been ambassador at Vienna, though that in a year

when Marie Antoinette was a baby, so that she had no early memories of

his snub-nose and happy, round face; but she had known his name all her

life from the talk of the palace in Vienna, and she had known it under

the title which he had assumed just after her birth. The Duc de Choiseul

was for her, as for every foreigner, a name now permanently associated

with French policy and a Minister who was identical with Versailles.

Maria Theresa was grateful to him for having permitted the marriage of

her daughter: that daughter after some months of the French Court very

probably imagined that he had not only permitted but helped to design

the alliance. It was against this man that the Du Barry stumbled.

It would not be just to accuse the young woman Du Barry of design. The

State was a very vague thing to her. She held good fellowship with many,

owed her advancement to Choiseul’s enemies, and was, in general, the

creature of the clique opposed to him, while for D’Aiguillon, who

already posed as the rival of the elder man, she felt perhaps a personal

affection. She was very vain and full of that domestic ambition which

comes in floods upon women of her sort when they attain a position of

some regularity. She loved to feel herself possessed of what she had

learned in the old days to call (in the jargon of her lovers) “office,”

“power”; to feel that she could “make” people. As for the pleasure of an

applauded judgment, or the satisfaction of that appetite for choice

which inspires women of Madame de Pompadour’s sort in history, the Du

Barry would not have understood the existence of such an emotion. The

most inept and the most base received the advantage of her patronage,

not because she believed them capable of administration, but simply

because they had shown least scruple in receiving her, or later, amid

the general coldness of the Court, had been the first to pay her an

exaggerated respect. As for those with whom she could recall

familiarities in the past, she was willing to make the fortunes of them

all.

Though such an attitude could easily have been played upon by the

courtiers of her set, it could never have supplied a motive force for

her demands nor have nourished the tenacity with which she pressed them;

that force and that tenacity were supplied to her by her own acute

sensitiveness upon her new position. The angry pique to which all her

kind can be moved in the day of their highly imperfect success was

aflame at every incident which recalled to her the truth of her origin

and the incongruity of her situation: in her convulsive desire to

revenge against every slight, real or imagined, she found an ally in the

old King, her lover. He also knew that he was in a posture of

humiliation, and under his calm and tired bearing he suffered a

continual irritation from that knowledge. As he pottered about his

frying-pans, cooking some late dish to his liking, or went alone and

almost furtively down the hidden stair between her little, low,

luxurious rooms and his own rooms of state, his silent mind was even

less at ease than in the days, now so long past, when an utter weariness

with the things of the flesh and a despair of discovering other emotions

had first put into his eyes the tragedy that still shines from them upon

the walls of Versailles.

All, therefore, that the Du Barry did through Louis XV. as her power

increased was not for this or that person whom she feared or loved; it

was rather against this or that person whose presence she found

intolerable. All that she suggested, so far as persons were concerned,

the King was ready to achieve.

Had some married woman of force and subtlety formed the centre of

opposition to the Favourite, the reign would have ended easily. Mary of

Saxony, the Dauphin’s mother, had been such a woman, and would, had she

lived, have conducted affairs to a decent close. Fate put in the place

of such a woman first three old maids—the King’s daughters—and next this

little girl, the Dauphine.

The origins were slight, but in its course the quarrel gathered impetus.

At first came that silent great supper-party at La Muette and the

instinctive repulsion which the child felt and which this woman from the

streets as instinctively resented. Next, in the summer, one of the

Dauphine’s women had a sharp quarrel with the Favourite in the stalls of

the Court theatre. The Favourite had her exiled from Court, and the

Dauphine, crying secretly with anger in her rooms, could obtain no

redress. During the summer absences of the Court in the country palaces

a perpetual travel and larger room to move prevented an open battle; in

the following winter that very grave event, the exile of Choiseul,

sealed the difference.

It was the error of Choiseul not that he had opposed the Favourite’s

entry—on the contrary, he had thought it a useful whim that would amuse

and occupy his sovereign—but that he could not take her seriously. His

“world,” his relatives, his intimates, those whom he had placed and

salaried during twelve years of power, were outspoken in their contempt

for the Du Barry. Her own simple spite lumped all together and made the

Minister the cause of her difficulties and their victim. For months she

had half amused, half frightened Louis by an increasing insolence to De

Choiseul at cards and at table. He had met this insolence at first with

the ironic courtesy that he must have shown during his life to a hundred

such women; later, by a careful and veiled defence; last of all by a

resigned and somewhat dignified expectation of what he saw would be the

end.

When a society approaches some convulsion the pace of change increases

enormously with every step towards the catastrophe. “_This_ at least no

one dreams of. _That_ at least cannot happen!” But this and that do

happen, and at last all feel themselves to be impotent spectators of a

process so forcible and swift that no wisdom can arrest it. Political

literature in such moments turns to mere criticism and speculation; it

no longer pleads, still less directs. So it is to-day with more than one

society of Western Europe; so it was with the close of Louis XV.’s

reign.

In May 1770, when the Austrian alliance was consummated by the arrival

of Marie Antoinette and by the wedding at Versailles, the revocation of

the one conspicuous statesman in France would have seemed impossible. He

had no more capacity than have the most of politicians, but he did at

least read the rough standard demanded in that trade, and his name was

rooted in the mind of his own public and of Europe. If the dismissal of

Choiseul had been proposed in the summer, there still remained enough

active force opposed to this new Du Barry woman to have prevented the

folly; but at the rate things were going every month weakened that

force; by the end of the year it was too late to act in his defence.

On Christmas Eve fat Hilliers came lurching out of the Favourite’s room

and brought Choiseul a note in Louis’ hand. It was a short note exiling

him to his place at Chanteloup and relieving him of office.

There was no one to replace the Minister: the action was that of a

common woman who exercised a private vengeance and could conceive no

reasons of State. Yet no one was astonished—save perhaps the child to

whom so vast a change was the climax of all that had bewildered her

since she had first spoken to the French Court.

Maria Theresa and Mercy, her ambassador to Versailles, had that

knowledge of the world which permitted each to find footing, even in

such a welter. Each from a long experience knew well that the depth of

political life moves slowly for all the violent changes of machinery or

of names. Each felt the alliance—the object of all their solicitude—to

be still standing, in spite of Choiseul’s fall; and each divined that

their little Princess, who was the pledge of that alliance at the French

Court, and whom they destined, when she was Queen, to be its

perpetuator, might at this moment weaken and ruin it: her probable

indiscretion and her simplicity were the points of danger. Her

plain-spoken anger might ruin their plans for a recovery of Austrian

influence. Each therefore concentrated upon a special effort—Mercy by

repeated visits from the Austrian Embassy in Paris to the Court at

Versailles and by repeated admonitions; Maria Theresa (in whom the fear

for her daughter’s future and position was even greater than her

solicitude for the Austrian policy) by repeated letters, too insistent

perhaps and too personal wholly to effect their object.

Marie Antoinette was persuaded to a certain restraint, but she was

neither convinced nor instructed. She saw the whole situation as a girl

would see it, in black and white: Madame du Barry was of the gutter, and

had yet been able to destroy a name she had always heard associated with

the fortunes of her own family and the dignity of the French Crown. The

complexity of the situation, the short years it was likely to last, the

necessity during those years of weighing the intricate and changing

attachments of the great families in their interlacing groups—all this

escaped her.

So little did she see the intricate pattern of politics that, when Louis

XV., less than two months later, exiled the higher courts of law and all

but roused a rebellion, she did not connect with the reign of her enemy

this act of violence which isolated and imperilled the Crown; she

thought it royal, immediate, and just, still seeing mere kingship, as

children see it in a fairy tale, beneficent and paternal.

The six months of administrative anarchy that followed meant nothing to

her. When in July, D’Aiguillon—inept, a mere servitor of the

Favourite’s—was at last appointed to the vacant post of Prime Minister,

this act—in its way more astounding than the dismissal of Choiseul—was

only remarkable to her because it was the Du Barry’s doing. And during

the whole of her sixteenth year she represented at Court a fixed

indignation which, in her alone, steadily increased as the powers of the

Favourite became absolute; for as Marie Antoinette approached womanhood

she developed a quality of resistance which was the one element of

strength of her early character, but from which was fatally absent any

power to design. That obstinate power of resistance was to raise around

her multiplying and enduring enmities; it was to mature her in her first

severe trials, but was also to bring her to the tragedy which has lent

her name enduring and exaggerated nobility.

This opposition which the Dauphine offered to Madame du Barry, an

opposition which did but rise as that woman (during 1771) opened, one

after the other, all the avenues of power to her lowest or least capable

courtiers, took on no form of violence.

Marie Antoinette, as the pale auburn of her hair and her thick eyebrows

darkened, as her frame strengthened and her voice took on a fuller tone,

added to the vivacity of her childhood a new note of passionate emphasis

which was ill-suited to her part, and which in any circumstances but

those of luxury would have approached vulgarity. In many minor matters

she forbore to put the least restraint upon a momentary annoyance; she

would have some design she disapproved destroyed; a bookcase, though it

was Gabriel’s, she had broken before her eyes to appease her discontent.

But in the major matter of this quarrel she put on a sort of solemnity,

and her resistance took the simple but unconquerable form of silence.

She would not recognise the Favourite, though she were to meet her five

times a day, and she would not address one word to her.

That silence, which kept open at Court a sharp wound and which stood a

permanent and a most powerful menace to all that had power at

Versailles, became for Mesdames the King’s daughters (who had first

given this example) and for all the defeated parties a welcome

symbol—though for the Princess herself it was a most perilous one. To

break that silence was the effort of every converging force about her.

Her mother in repeated warnings; Mercy, the King, and most of all the

Favourite herself, came to think it a first point of policy that what

might have been pardoned in the child should not remain a cause of acute

offence in the woman. She was now nearly eighteen months at Versailles;

she had entered her seventeenth year. But whenever the Du Barry crossed

her in the receptions or met her eyes at table, whatever beginnings of a

salute may have escaped the loose manner of the Favourite, she suffered

the mortification of a complete refusal. The feminine comedy was

admirably played, and for the Dauphine the King’s mistress remained a

picture or an empty chair—sometimes to be blankly gazed at; never to be

recognised or addressed.

There was indeed a moment in August when the Dauphine’s resolution

wavered. Mercy had visited the Du Barry; he had spoken to her intimately

and with gallantry. He had probably promised her the graces of the

Dauphine; he returned to Marie Antoinette to press his advice. So

pressed she promised her mother’s ambassador that she would speak, but

when the moment came and the meeting had been carefully arranged, after

cards at evening, she remembered too much: she remembered perhaps most

keenly a recent thing, the choice of one of this woman’s friends, in

spite of her protests, for one of her ladies-in-waiting. She strolled to

the table where Mercy and the Favourite were talking together. As she

came up Madame du Barry put on an air of expectation which invited her

approach. The girl hesitated and turned back. A scene not consonant to

that society was avoided only by Madame Adelaide, who had the presence

of mind to summon her niece at the critical moment of the insult; but

the fiasco led to further and more peremptory orders from her mother, to

a long and troubled interview between Mercy and the King, and at last to

the conclusion which they all desired. The Dauphine recognised the Du

Barry; but the recognition came in a manner so characteristic of Marie

Antoinette that it would have been better for her and for them if they

had not won their battle.

Upon the New Year’s Day of 1772 at Versailles, on which day it was

agreed (and this time most solemnly vowed) that a greeting should be

given, and during the formal reception held at Court that day, there

came a moment when, in an uneasy silence, the moving crowd of the Court

saw the Dauphine approach the Favourite, pass before her, and say as she

passed—not so directly nor so loudly as might be wished, but still so

that the Du Barry might have taken the words as addressed to herself:

“_There are very many people at Versailles to-day_.” Before a reply

could be given her she had passed on. Next day she said to Mercy: “I

shall not let that woman hear the sound of my voice again.”

The moment of time during which this quarrel reached its height was one

of extreme anxiety to Maria Theresa, and indeed to all. It was that

during which the first public renunciation of the international morality

which had hitherto ruled in Christendom was in negotiation at the

instance of Prussia. It was secretly proposed that an European

government should be disregarded without treaty and subjected to mere

force without the sanction of our general civilisation. Frederick had

suggested to Russia long before with deference, recently to Catholic

Austria with a sneer, the partition of Poland.

It is characteristic of the more deplorable forms of insurgence against

civilised morals that they originate either in a race permanently alien

to (though present in) the unity of the Roman Empire, or in those

barbaric provinces which were admitted to the European scheme after the

fall of Rome, and which for the most part enjoyed but a brief and

precarious vision of the Faith between their tardy conversion and the

schism of the sixteenth century. Prussia was of this latter kind, and

with Prussia Frederick. To-day his successors and their advisers, when

they attempt to justify the man, are compelled still to ignore the

European tradition of honour. But this crime of his, the partition of

Poland, the germ of all that international distrust which has ended in

the intolerable armed strain of our time, has another character attached

to it: a character which attaches invariably to ill-doing when that

ill-doing is also uncivilised. It was a folly. The same folly attached

to it as has attached to every revolt against the historic conscience of

Europe: such blindnesses can only destroy; they possess no permanent

creative spirit, and the partition of Poland has remained a peculiar and

increasing curse to its promoters in Prussia; to their mere accomplices

in St. Petersburg it has caused and is causing less weakness and peril;

while it has left but a slight inheritance of suffering to the

Hapsburgs, whose chief was at the moment of the crime but a most

reluctant party to it.

There is not in Christian history, though it abounds in coincidence or

design, a more striking example of sin suitably rewarded than the menace

which is presented to the Hohenzollerns to-day by the Polish race. Not

even their hereditary disease, which has reached its climax in the

present generation, has proved so sure a chastisement to the lineage of

Frederick as have proved the descendants of those whose country he

destroyed. An economic accident has scattered them throughout the

dominions of the Prussian dynasty; they are a source everywhere of

increasing danger and ill-will. They grow largely in representative

power. They compel the government to abominable barbarities which are

already arousing the mind of Europe. They will in the near future prove

the ruin of that family to which was originally due the partition of

Poland.

Enormous as was the event, however, both in its quality of evil and in

its consequences to mankind, it must not detain the reader of these

pages. Its interest here lies only in the first and principal example

which it affords of Marie Antoinette’s direct and therefore unpolitical

temper. She was indeed only upon the verge of womanhood—she had but

completed her sixteenth year—but her failure to understand the critical,

and, above all, the complex necessities of the Hapsburgs at that moment

was characteristic of all the further miscalculations that were to mark

her continual interference with diplomacy for twenty years. It was

imperative that Austria should find support in the grave issue to which

Maria Theresa had been compelled against her conscience and her reason.

Berlin and St. Petersburg suddenly having agreed to a mutual

aggrandisement, help was imperative, and help could only come from her

ally at Versailles. Upon this one occasion, if upon no other, the young

daughter of the Empress was justified in working for her family, and

that could only be done through the woman whose influence was now the

one avenue of approach to Louis XV. A recognition of the Du Barry was

essential to Vienna in that new year of 1772. The Dauphine made it, but

she made it in such a way that it was a worse insult even than had been

her former silence. Had war broken out that spring, at the melting of

the snow, it is possible or probable that Versailles would not have

supported Vienna against Prussia and Russia in arms.

There was almost a quarrel between the growing girl and the Empress her

mother. To that mother she still remained the child who had left Vienna

two years before; but then, in Versailles and to those who saw her, this

year made her a woman.

That she had passed the boundary of adolescence was apparent in many

ways. She was more and more enfranchised from the influence of elder

women—notably of her husband’s aunts, her intimacy with whom faded

throughout 1772 and disappeared in 1773. Her step had acquired that firm

and rather conscious poise which was to distinguish her throughout her

life. The growth of her stature was now accomplished, and she was tall,

and though her shoulders had not the grace and amplitude which they

later assumed, her figure had, in general, achieved maturity. Her hair,

now a trifle darker and browner in its red, her eyebrows, always

pronounced but now thicker and more prominent, announced the same

change. Her motives also, though insufficient in judgment, were deeper

in origin. Her resistance to her mother’s and to Mercy’s most pressing

insistence in the matter of the Favourite was a resistance no longer

even partially suggested to her by others; it was due now to a full

comprehension of the old King’s degradation, and to a formed abhorrence

of the Du Barry. Moreover, when she yielded for a moment—as she did

perhaps three times in the course of two years—it was with some measure

of thought: she consented to approach the King’s mistress at moments

when the ambassador or her mother had convinced her by speech or letter

of an acute necessity; but already, in her excuses when she refused, she

began to use the argument of a woman, not of a child—she pleaded the

“authority of her husband”: it was a phrase in which she, least of all,

put faith!

With this advent of womanhood there came, of necessity to a character so

ardent, fixed enmities. She was no longer despised as a child; she was

hated as an adult. Mesdames the King’s daughters, whose influence over

her had disappeared, joined, in their disappointment, the over-large

group of her detractors. The fatal name of “Autrichienne,” the foreign

label that clung to her at the scaffold, originated in the drawing-rooms

of the three old maids, and all around her, as her power to order or to

fascinate increased, there increased also new hatreds which attained to

permanence, because her German memories, her eager action, her crude and

single aspect of the multitudinous and subtle French character, her

rapid turning from this pleasure to that, her ignorance of books and of

things, lent her no power to wear these courtiers down or to play a

skilful game against them.

Forgetfulness was easy to her. To help her to forget she had the

intoxication of that moment which comes once in life and is the powerful

blossoming of our humanity. Her eighteenth year, the last year before

she ascended the throne, was the great moment of her youth.

She had not been beautiful as a child, she was not destined to real

beauty in her womanhood; but at this moment, with the spring of 1773 and

on to that of 1774, there radiated from her the irresistible appeal of

youth.

Paris, which had learnt to despise and half to hate the Crown, which had

felt itself widowed and abandoned by the emigration of the Bourbons to

Versailles, caught her charm for a day. When she made with the Dauphin

her first official entry into the city, great crowds acclaimed her

perpetually; she had that emotion, so dear to women that it will drive

them on to the stage itself, of a public applause directed towards their

persons: the general applause of Paris was almost an applause of lovers.

For just these passing hours on a sweet day in early June she saw and

loved the city wherein her doom was written upon every stone, and for

these hours the Tuileries which she inhabited were faëry and so full of

delight that she could not tell whether the air was magical or owed its

fragrance only to the early flowers.

In such a mood, daily drinking in happiness and a certain sense of

power, admired almost openly by distant men and—very likely—by Artois,

her young brother-in-law, who had known her all these years, she passed

the high tide of the summer and autumn, and found in the ensuing winter

for the first time that lively and absorbing interest in social pleasure

which very largely determined her life.

Of the balls in which she danced, of the masked balls that were her

special delight, one stands out in history—and stood out in her own

memories, even to her last hour, a night unlike all others.

* * * * *

The reader has divined that the marriage of May 1770 had been no

marriage. It was contracted between children; and years must pass—years

which were those of the school-room for both of them—before Maria

Theresa could expect an heir with Hapsburg blood for the French throne.

But those years passed; the child was now a woman, and still the

marriage remained a form.

From an accident to which I will return in its proper place, the Dauphin

and herself were not wife and husband; and to this grave historical fact

must largely be attributed the disasters that were to follow. For the

moment, however, this misfortune did little but accentuate her isolation

and perhaps her pride. In her childish advent to the Court it could mean

nothing to her. Lately she had understood a little more clearly; but she

was pure; her training was in admirable conformity to her faith; she was

not yet troubled—until the opening of that last year ’74, with its

gaiety and pride. This season of vigour, radiance and youth lacked the

emotion which has been so wisely and so justly fitted by God to that one

moment through which we make our entry into a full life. She was married

to the heir of France: her virtue and her pride forbade her to be loved.

Yet was she also not married to that heir, and her life now lacked, and

continued to lack, not only love, but the ardent regard that was her

due.

No Frenchman could have turned her gaze. Between her temperament and

that of her husband’s nation the gulf was far too deep. But one night,

late, as she moved, masked in her domino, through the crowd of a Paris

ball-room, she saw, among so many faces whose surface only was revealed

to her, another face of another kind—a boy’s. It arrested her. The

simple and sincere expression which Versailles had never shown her, the

quiet manliness which, in Northerners, is so often allied to courage and

which stands in such contrast to the active virility of Gaul—all that

which, in the secret places of her German heart, unknown to herself, she

thought proper to a man, all that whose lack (though she could not

analyse it) had disturbed and wounded her in the French palace, was

apparent in the face before her. She asked his name, and heard that it

was Fersen. He was a Swede, the son of a considerable political noble,

sent here on his travels with a tutor. She went up and spoke to him.

She could look into his eyes and see their chivalry. His low, handsome

forehead, his dark brows, his refined, firm lips, his large and gentle

eyes completed in detail the profound impression with which that first

glance had struck her. Once she had begun to speak to him, so masked,

she continued to speak continually. A boy of eighteen is far younger

than a girl of his age—they were born within six weeks of each other,

and he was a child compared with her; he desired her, she consenting,

and he became hers in that moment. When they had separated and he

reached his rooms at morning there was ready in his heart what later he

wrote down, that the Dauphine was delightful, and that she was the most

charming Princess he ever had known. She upon her side had followed him

with her eyes to the door of the great assembly. She was not to see him

again for four years, but during all those years she remembered him.

* * * * *

This was the way in which Marie Antoinette entered life, and almost

simultaneously with that entry came her ascent of the throne: the old

King was changing.

He suffered: his digestion failed; from time to time he would abandon

his hunting. It was in the January of 1774 that the Dauphine had met

Axel de Fersen. Before the spring of that year Louis XV.’s increasing

infirmities were to reach their end.

Gusts of strong faith swept over him in these failing years, as strong

winds, filled with a memory of autumn, will sweep the dead reeds of

December. His fear of death, and that hunger for the Sacraments which

accompanies the fear, came to him in dreadful moments. For thirty-eight

years he had neither communicated nor confessed. All his life he had

avoided the terrace of St. Germain’s, because a little lump far off

against the Eastern sky was St. Denis, the mausoleum of the Kings, and

he had not dared to look on it. But, with no such memorial before him,

Death now appeared and reappeared.

Once in his little private room—it was late at night and November—he

played at cards with the Du Barry. They were alone, save for an old

crony of his pleasures, Chauvelin, which well-bred and aged fellow stood

behind the woman’s chair, leaning upon it and watching the woman’s cards

in silence, his rapacious features strongly marked in the mellow light

of the candles. Something impelled the woman to glance up at him over

her shoulder. “Oh, Lord! M. de Chauvelin, what a face!” It was the face

of a dead man. She leapt and started from it, and the body fell to the

floor.

The King, his age and apathy all shaken from him, shouted down the empty

corridors: “A priest! a priest!” They came, and in the presence of the

King absolved what lay immovable upon the shining floor, in a hope or

wish that some life lingered there. But Chauvelin was quite dead.

Now, in his last Easter, the dread came back for ever and inhabited the

King. Upon the Maundy Thursday of ’74 (it was the last day of March) the

Court were all at Mass, and the sermon was ending. The priest, strong in

that tradition of Bossuet which had not perished, turned to the royal

chair and related for his peroration the legend of an ancient curse:

“Forty days, and Nineveh shall be no more.” All the Court heard it and

forgot it before the chanting of the creed was done—but the King was

troubled. He reckoned in his mind; he counted dates and was troubled.

The liturgical times went by; he abandoned his mistress; he lived apart

and gloomy: but his Easter duties were not accomplished, nor did he

communicate or confess, nor was he absolved. Then the cloud lifted and

he began to forget, and the tie which held him to the Du Barry, and

which had in it now something of maturity and routine, was very strong

upon him. He yielded and returned to her where she waited for him down

the park at the little Trianon. His domesticity returned—but not for

long.

It was upon Tuesday the 26th of April that he came in from hunting

changed. He would not eat. He wandered a little and was cherished by his

companion, but his fever grew. Next day he woke to suffering. He

attempted to hunt, but his knees were weakened and he could not ride his

horse; and coming back to Trianon, he groaned with his head in torment.

His dread increased; but his doctors, who had been long familiar with

his moody interludes, thought little of the thing. They carried him back

through the trees to the palace, to his own room in the northern wing,

and that day and the next, as the fever grew, rumours went louder and

louder in the palace. On the Friday, at eventide, as a candle chanced

near the face of the sick man, the doctor looked closer; and in the next

hour, before midnight, the Princess Clothilde, talking in Madame de

Marin’s room in whispers to the Duke of Crois, opened a note from the

Dauphine. She cried aloud: “They say it is the small-pox!”

They dared not tell him. He had the assurance to demand the truth, and

when he heard it he said, “At my age a man does not recover.” He

maintained from that moment, through the increasing torment and

disfigurement of his disease, a complete mastery over himself and even

to some extent the powder of ordering the Court. He saw to it that his

grandson the Dauphin should not come near his room, for of all the royal

families in Europe the French Bourbons alone had not been vaccinated. He

accepted the services of his daughters.

One thing alone he hesitated on, and that was to relinquish the society

of his Favourite.

He was too proud and too silent a man for his contemporaries or for

ourselves to know the full cause of his hesitation. Passion at that

moment it could not have been. The possibility of his recovery he had

himself denied, and his every phrase and act showed how clearly he felt

the approach of death. He himself had drawn the secret of his malady

from the reluctant Cardinal whose duty it was, as Grand Almoner, first

to inform him of his danger, but whose worldly fear of consequence had

kept him from speaking—though he was urged to his duty by every other

prelate at Court. The King was in no doubt as to the nature of the soul,

nor as to the scandal which, under the special conditions of his throne,

his one great frailty had given. He knew the Church; he could not, as

might a philosopher, take refuge in the memory of good deeds to outweigh

the evil, or (as might a monarch of a different civilisation) in the

deep hypocrisies which there shield birth and wealth from

self-knowledge. His Christian faith was strong and clean. Yet he

hesitated. If he still clung to the Du Barry, it was perhaps because

nothing was left him in the visible world but the gaiety and the

assiduous care which had endeared this woman to him.

She kept near him throughout the first hours of his malady, and every

evening, when the Princesses had left their father’s room, she would

come in by a private further door and sit beside the little camp-bed on

which he lay. She overcame all repugnance; she soothed his pustuled

forehead with her hand. He felt, perhaps, as though to abandon her was a

first breaking with life.

The aged Archbishop of Paris, himself suffering grievously from the

stone, bore, not without groaning, the jolting journey to Versailles; he

came to undertake himself what the Grand Almoner dared not do—to demand

the dismissal of the Favourite. He was not allowed into the King’s room.

The group of courtiers continually present in the outer chamber, the Œil

de Bœuf, could watch with much amusement the gestures of command and of

refusal that passed between the Archbishop and the Duke of Richelieu in

the antechamber beyond. At last he was admitted, but it was arranged

that others should be present, and nothing passed between him and the

King save a word of condolence from each for the other’s suffering.

It was by no stimulation from without but by his own act that the King

took the last step in his penance. Upon Tuesday the 3rd of May, towards

midnight, Madame du Barry being with him, as was her custom, to tend him

through the night, he said to her, in those brief sentences of his which

had for years forbidden discussion or reply, that he must prepare for

his end and that she must leave him; he told her that a refuge was

prepared, and that she should want for nothing. She stumbled half

fainting from the room to the Minister whose career she had made, the

Duke of Aiguillon, believing with justice that he was not ungrateful,

and in his rooms she cried and lamented through what remained of

darkness.

With the morning the King gave D’Aiguillon his orders, and that

afternoon the Duke, worthily loyal although his career was ended, sent

his own wife to take her in a hired carriage, without circumstance and

therefore without disgrace, to their country house some miles away. It

was the thirty-fourth of the forty days.

That evening the King asked Laborde, his valet, for Madame du Barry. The

servant answered that she was gone. “Already?” he sighed, and her name

was not heard again.

Thursday and Friday passed: the first with a rally which the more

foolish hoped would save the life of the King; the second with the

disappointment of all that corrupt and intriguing clique which depended

upon his recovery.

Meanwhile the Dauphine kept her rooms. She knew what desperate court

would be pressed upon her husband and herself were the doors to be

opened; nor did the Dauphin give a single order of the hundred that were

already solicited of him, save that all should be ready for the whole

Court to leave for Choisy. Early upon the morning of Saturday this

seclusion was broken: long before the common hour of the palace, at

half-past five, a roll of drums awakened its people, and the Princess

came down with all her ladies to see the Sacrament carried through

Versailles.

[Illustration:

LOUIS XVI

FROM THE PRINCIPAL BUST AT VERSAILLES

]

Between a double row of the Guard, under the great canopy that was

reserved for such solemnities, the priests carried the Viaticum, and

about It in a long procession as It passed were the torches and the

candles. She stood with her sister-in-law at the head of the crowd in

the great hall outside the bedroom door; she endured the stench of

corruption that filled the air, though every window was open to the

morning; she caught, by her tall stature and straight carriage, the

scene that was acting within.

Between the purple robes and the surplices, in the ring of waxen lights,

she saw the old man whom alone she had respected and indeed loved in her

new home attempt to raise himself, calling: “_My great God has come to

me.... My great God!_” She saw him with what strength he had plucking

the cotton cap from his head and failing in his effort to kneel. His

face was no longer the face she had known, but crusted dark and hideous,

swollen, horrible. She heard the Grand Almoner repeat the King’s strong

phrase of repentance, passionately solemn, and she knew the voice so

well that perhaps she also heard the mumble in which he urged its

repetition. Then the doors closed; the Court dispersed. She regained her

apartments, and the isolation and the strain returned. They told her of

his increasing delirium, of the crowds that came from Paris daily, of

the certain approach of death. So Sunday and Monday went by—the

thirty-eighth, the thirty-ninth day.

The dawn of Tuesday broke upon a clear sky. It was the fortieth day.

The spring on that fine morning turned to summer, and before noon the

Park was full of a crowd which moved as though on holiday. The Parisians

had come increasingly since Sunday into Versailles. The inns were full,

and at all the tables outside the eating-houses of the town the people

eat their mid-day meal with merriment in the open air. Between the Park

and the town, huge and isolated, already old, the palace alone was

silent. There, each group shut close in its own rooms, awaited—the one

dismissal, another the fruit of long intrigue, another, in a mixture of

eagerness and dread, the new weight of royalty. It was the 10th of May,

and still the agony endured. A candle burnt in a window above the

courtyard. Passing groups looked up at it furtively; grooms, with

bridles ready in their hands, glanced at it from beneath the distant

doors of the guard-room, and saw it twice renewed, as one o’clock and

two struck through the afternoon from the chimes of St. Louis. Three

struck. They looked again and it was still shining.

Within, his head supported by Laborde the valet, his mind still clear,

the old King still attempted with his distorted lips the answers to the

prayers for the dying. He heard them faintly and more faintly in that

increasing darkness which each of us must face. When the priest at last

came to those loud words, “Go forth, thou Christian soul,” his murmuring

ceased. The candle at the window was extinguished. The clatter of

horse-hoofs rose from the marble court and the jangling of stirrups

against mounting spurs. The Duke of Bouillon came to the door of the

room, stood before the silent crowd in the Œil de Bœuf, and said with

ritual solemnity: “_Gentlemen, the King is dead!_”

At that same hour on that same day a British man-of-war sailed into

Boston harbour: she bore orders to impose the tax on tea which

ultimately raised America.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Marie Antoinette(#69542) · 第 5 / 21 章