CHAPTER V.

GERANIACEAE, LEGUMINOSAE, ONAGRACEAE, ETC.

Pelargonium zonale, a cross between plants propagated by cuttings does

no good.

Tropaeolum minus.

Limnanthes douglasii.

Lupinus luteus and pilosus.

Phaseolus multiflorus and vulgaris.

Lathyrus odoratus, varieties of, never naturally intercross in England.

Pisum sativum, varieties of, rarely intercross, but a cross between them

highly beneficial.

Sarothamnus scoparius, wonderful effects of a cross.

Ononis minutissima, cleistogene flowers of.

Summary on the Leguminosae.

Clarkia elegans.

Bartonia aurea.

Passiflora gracilis.

Apium petroselinum.

Scabiosa atropurpurea.

Lactuca sativa.

Specularia speculum.

Lobelia ramosa, advantages of a cross during two generations.

Lobelia fulgens.

Nemophila insignis, great advantages of a cross.

Borago officinalis.

Nolana prostrata.

13. GERANIACEAE.--Pelargonium zonale.

This plant, as a general rule, is strongly proterandrous, and is

therefore adapted for cross-fertilisation by the aid of insects. (5/1.

Mr. J. Denny, a great raiser of new varieties of pelargoniums, after

stating that this species is proterandrous, adds ‘The Florist and

Pomologist’ January 1872 page 11, “there are some varieties, especially

those with petals of a pink colour, or which possess a weakly

constitution, where the pistil expands as soon as or even before the

pollen-bag bursts, and in which also the pistil is frequently short, so

when it expands it is smothered as it were by the bursting anthers;

these varieties are great seeders, each pip being fertilised by its own

pollen. I would instance Christine as an example of this fact.” We have

here an interesting case of variability in an important functional

point.) Some flowers on a common scarlet variety were self-fertilised,

and other flowers were crossed with pollen from another plant; but no

sooner had I done so, than I remembered that these plants had been

propagated by cuttings from the same stock, and were therefore parts in

a strict sense of the same individual. Nevertheless, having made the

cross I resolved to save the seeds, which, after germinating on sand,

were planted on the opposite sides of three pots. In one pot the

quasi-crossed plant was very soon and ever afterwards taller and finer

than the self-fertilised. In the two other pots the seedlings on both

sides were for a time exactly equal; but when the self-fertilised plants

were about 10 inches in height, they surpassed their antagonists by a

little, and ever afterwards showed a more decided and increasing

advantage; so that the self-fertilised plants, taken altogether, were

somewhat superior to the quasi-crossed plants. In this case, as in that

of the Origanum, if individuals which have been asexually propagated

from the same stock, and which have been long subjected to the same

conditions, are crossed, no advantage whatever is gained.

Several flowers on another plant of the same variety were fertilised

with pollen from the younger flowers on the same plant, so as to avoid

using the old and long-shed pollen from the same flower, as I thought

that this latter might be less efficient than fresh pollen. Other

flowers on the same plant were crossed with fresh pollen from a plant

which, although closely similar, was known to have arisen as a distinct

seedling. The self-fertilised seeds germinated rather before the others;

but as soon as I got equal pairs they were planted on the opposite sides

of four pots.

TABLE 5/49. Pelargonium zonale.

Heights of plants measured in inches.

Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot.

Column 2: Crossed Plants.

Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants.

Pot 1 : 22 3/8 : 25 5/8.

Pot 1 : 19 6/8 : 12 4/8.

Pot 2 : 15 : 19 6/8.

Pot 2 : 12 2/8 : 22 3/8.

Pot 3 : 30 5/8 : 19 4/8.

Pot 3 : 18 4/8 : 7 4/8.

Pot 4 : 38 : 9 1/8.

Total : 156.50 : 116.38.

When the two lots of seedlings were between 4 and 5 inches in height

they were equal, excepting in Pot 4, in which the crossed plant was much

the tallest. When between 11 and 14 inches in height, they were measured

to the tips of their uppermost leaves; the crossed averaged 13.46, and

the self-fertilised 11.07 inches in height, or as 100 to 82. Five months

later they were again measured in the same manner, and the results are

given in Table 5/49.

The seven crossed plants now averaged 22.35, and the seven

self-fertilised 16.62 inches in height, or as 100 to 74. But from the

great inequality of the several plants, the result is less trustworthy

than in most other cases. In Pot 2 the two self-fertilised plants always

had an advantage, except whilst quite young over the two crossed plants.

As I wished to ascertain how these plants would behave during a second

growth, they were cut down close to the ground whilst growing freely.

The crossed plants now showed their superiority in another way, for only

one out of the seven was killed by the operation, whilst three of the

self-fertilised plants never recovered. There was, therefore, no use in

keeping any of the plants excepting those in Pots 1 and 3; and in the

following year the crossed plants in these two pots showed during their

second growth nearly the same relative superiority over the

self-fertilised plants as before.

Tropaeolum minus.

The flowers are proterandrous, and are manifestly adapted for

cross-fertilisation by insects, as shown by Sprengel and Delpino. Twelve

flowers on some plants growing out of doors were crossed with pollen

from a distinct plant and produced eleven capsules, containing

altogether twenty-four good seeds. Eighteen flowers were fertilised with

their own pollen and produced only eleven capsules, containing

twenty-two good seeds; so that a much larger proportion of the crossed

than of the self-fertilised flowers produced capsules, and the crossed

capsules contained rather more seed than the self-fertilised in the

ratio of 100 to 92. The seeds from the self-fertilised capsules were

however the heavier of the two, in the ratio of 100 to 87.

Seeds in an equal state of germination were planted on the opposite

sides of four pots, but only the two tallest plants on each side of each

pot were measured to the tops of their stems. The pots were placed in

the greenhouse, and the plants trained up sticks, so that they ascended

to an unusual height. In three of the pots the crossed plants flowered

first, but in the fourth at the same time with the self-fertilised. When

the seedlings were between 6 and 7 inches in height, the crossed began

to show a slight advantage over their opponents. When grown to a

considerable height the eight tallest crossed plants averaged 44.43, and

the eight tallest self-fertilised plants 37.34 inches, or as 100 to 84.

When their growth was completed they were again measured, as shown in

Table 5/50.

TABLE 5/50. Tropaeolum minus.

Heights of plants measured in inches.

Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot.

Column 2: Crossed Plants.

Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants.

Pot 1 : 65 : 31.

Pot 1 : 50 : 45.

Pot 2 : 69 : 42.

Pot 2 : 35 : 45.

Pot 3 : 70 : 50 4/8.

Pot 3 : 59 4/8 : 55 4/8.

Pot 4 : 61 4/8 : 37 4/8.

Pot 4 : 57 4/8 : 61 4/8.

Total : 467.5 : 368.0.

The eight tallest crossed plants now averaged 58.43, and the eight

tallest self-fertilised plants 46 inches in height, or as 100 to 79.

There was also a great difference in the fertility of the two lots which

were left uncovered in the greenhouse. On the 17th of September the

capsules from all the plants were gathered, and the seeds counted. The

crossed plants yielded 243, whilst the same number of self-fertilised

plants yielded only 155 seeds, or as 100 to 64.

Limnanthes douglasii.

Several flowers were crossed and self-fertilised in the usual manner,

but there was no marked difference in the number of seeds which they

yielded. A vast number of spontaneously self-fertilised capsules were

also produced under the net. Seedlings were raised in five pots from the

above seeds, and when the crossed were about 3 inches in height they

showed a slight advantage over the self-fertilised. When double this

height, the sixteen crossed and sixteen self-fertilised plants were

measured to the tips of their leaves; the former averaged 7.3 inches,

and the self-fertilised 6.07 inches in height, or as 100 to 83. In all

the pots, excepting 4, a crossed plant flowered before any one of the

self-fertilised plants. The plants, when fully grown, were again

measured to the summits of their ripe capsules, with the result in Table

5/51.

TABLE 5/51. Limnanthes douglasii.

Heights of plants to the summits of their ripe capsules, measured in inches.

Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot.

Column 2: Crossed Plants.

Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants.

Pot 1 : 17 7/8 : 15 1/8.

Pot 1 : 17 6/8 : 16 4/8.

Pot 1 : 13 : 11.

Pot 2 : 20 : 14 4/8.

Pot 2 : 22 : 15 6/8.

Pot 2 : 21 : 16 1/8.

Pot 2 : 18 4/8 : 17.

Pot 3 : 15 6/8 : 11 4/8.

Pot 3 : 17 2/8 : 10 4/8.

Pot 3 : 14 : 0.

Pot 4 : 20 4/8 : 13 4/8.

Pot 4 : 14 : 13.

Pot 4 : 18 : 12 2/8.

Pot 5 : 17 : 14 2/8.

Pot 5 : 18 5/8 : 14 1/8.

Pot 5 : 14 2/8 : 12 5/8.

Total : 279.50 : 207.75.

The sixteen crossed plants now averaged 17.46, and the fifteen (for one

had died) self-fertilised plants 13.85 inches in height, or as 100 to

79. Mr. Galton considers that a higher ratio would be fairer, namely,

100 to 76. He made a graphical representation of the above measurements,

and adds the words “very good” to the curvature thus formed. Both lots

of plants produced an abundance of seed-capsules, and, as far as could

be judged by the eye, there was no difference in their fertility.]

14. LEGUMINOSAE.

In this family I experimented on the following six genera, Lupinus,

Phaseolus, Lathyrus, Pisum, Sarothamnus, and Ononis.

[Lupinus luteus. (5/2. The structure of the flowers of this plant, and

their manner of fertilisation, have been described by H. Muller

‘Befruchtung’ etc. page 243. The flowers do not secrete free nectar, and

bees generally visit them for their pollen. Mr. Farrer, however, remarks

‘Nature’ 1872 page 499, that “there is a cavity at the back and base of

the vexillum, in which I have not been able to find nectar. But the

bees, which constantly visit these flowers, certainly go to this cavity

for what they want, and not to the staminal tube.”)

A few flowers were crossed with pollen from a distinct plant, but owing

to the unfavourable season only two crossed seeds were produced. Nine

seeds were saved from flowers spontaneously self-fertilised under a net,

on the same plant which yielded the two crossed seeds. One of these

crossed seeds was sown in a pot with two self-fertilised seeds on the

opposite side; the latter came up between two and three days before the

crossed seed. The second crossed seed was sown in like manner with two

self-fertilised seeds on the opposite side; these latter also came up

about a day before the crossed one. In both pots, therefore, the crossed

seedlings from germinating later, were at first completely beaten by the

self-fertilised; nevertheless, this state of things was afterwards

completely reversed. The seeds were sown late in the autumn, and the

pots, which were much too small, were kept in the greenhouse. The plants

in consequence grew badly, and the self-fertilised suffered most in both

pots. The two crossed plants when in flower during the following spring

were 9 inches in height; one of the self-fertilised plants was 8, and

the three others only 3 inches in height, being thus mere dwarfs. The

two crossed plants produced thirteen pods, whilst the four

self-fertilised plants produced only a single one. Some other

self-fertilised plants which had been raised separately in larger pots

produced several spontaneously self-fertilised pods under a net, and

seeds from these were used in the following experiment.

CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS OF THE SECOND GENERATION.

The spontaneously self-fertilised seeds just mentioned, and crossed

seeds obtained by intercrossing the two crossed plants of the last

generation, after germinating on sand, were planted in pairs on the

opposite sides of three large pots. When the seedlings were only 4

inches in height, the crossed had a slight advantage over their

opponents. When grown to their full height, every one of the crossed

plants exceeded its opponent in height. Nevertheless the self-fertilised

plants in all three pots flowered before the crossed! The measurements

are given in Table 5/52.

TABLE 5/52. Lupinus luteus.

Heights of plants measured in inches.

Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot.

Column 2: Crossed Plants.

Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants.

Pot 1 : 33 2/8 : 24 4/8.

Pot 1 : 30 4/8 : 18 4/8.

Pot 1 : 30 : 28.

Pot 2 : 29 4/8 : 26.

Pot 2 : 30 : 25.

Pot 3 : 30 4/8 : 28.

Pot 3 : 31 : 27 2/8.

Pot 3 : 31 4/8 : 24 4/8.

Total : 246.25 : 201.75.

The eight crossed plants here average 30.78, and the eight

self-fertilised 25.21 inches in height; or as 100 to 82. These plants

were left uncovered in the greenhouse to set their pods, but they

produced very few good ones, perhaps in part owing to few bees visiting

them. The crossed plants produced nine pods, containing on an average

3.4 seeds, and the self-fertilised plants seven pods, containing on an

average 3 seeds, so that the seeds from an equal number of plants were

as 100 to 88.

Two other crossed seedlings, each with two self-fertilised seedlings on

the opposite sides of the same large pot, were turned out of their pots

early in the season, without being disturbed, into open ground of good

quality. They were thus subjected to but little competition with one

another, in comparison with the plants in the above three pots. In the

autumn the two crossed plants were about 3 inches taller than the four

self-fertilised plants; they looked also more vigorous and produced many

more pods.

Two other crossed and self-fertilised seeds of the same lot, after

germinating on sand, were planted on the opposite sides of a large pot,

in which a Calceolaria had long been growing, and were therefore exposed

to unfavourable conditions: the two crossed plants ultimately attained a

height of 20 1/2 and 20 inches, whilst the two self-fertilised were only

18 and 9 1/2 inches high.

Lupinus pilosus.

From a series of accidents I was again unfortunate in obtaining a

sufficient number of crossed seedlings; and the following results would

not be worth giving, did they not strictly accord with those just given

with respect to Lupinus luteus. I raised at first only a single crossed

seedling, which was placed in competition with two self-fertilised ones

on the opposite side of the same pot. These plants, without being

disturbed, were soon afterwards turned into the open ground. By the

autumn the crossed plant had grown to so large a size that it almost

smothered the two self-fertilised plants, which were mere dwarfs; and

the latter died without maturing a single pod. Several self-fertilised

seeds had been planted at the same time separately in the open ground;

and the two tallest of these were 33 and 32 inches, whereas the one

crossed plant was 38 inches in height. This latter plant also produced

many more pods than did any one of the self-fertilised plants, although

growing separately. A few flowers on the one crossed plant were crossed

with pollen from one of the self-fertilised plants, for I had no other

crossed plant from which to obtain pollen. One of the self-fertilised

plants having been covered by a net produced plenty of spontaneously

self-fertilised pods.

CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS OF THE SECOND GENERATION.

From crossed and self-fertilised seeds obtained in the manner just

described, I succeeded in raising to maturity only a pair of plants,

which were kept in a pot in the greenhouse. The crossed plant grew to a

height of 33 inches, and the self-fertilised to that of 26 1/2 inches.

The former produced, whilst still kept in the greenhouse, eight pods,

containing on an average 2.77 seeds; and the latter only two pods,

containing on an average 2.5 seeds. The average height of the two

crossed plants of the two generations taken together was 35.5, and that

of the three self-fertilised plants of the same two generations 30.5; or

as 100 to 86. (5/3. We here see that both Lupinus luteus and pilosus

seed freely when insects are excluded; but Mr. Swale, of Christchurch,

in New Zealand, informs me ‘Gardeners’ Chronicle’ 1858 page 828, that

the garden varieties of the lupine are not there visited by any bees,

and that they seed less freely than any other introduced leguminous

plant, with the exception of red clover. He adds “I have, for amusement,

during the summer, released the stamens with a pin, and a pod of seed

has always rewarded me for my trouble, the adjoining flowers not so

served having all proved blind.” I do not know to what species this

statement refers.)

Phaseolus multiflorus.

This plant, the scarlet-runner of English gardeners and the Phaseolus

coccineus of Lamarck, originally came from Mexico, as I am informed by

Mr. Bentham. The flowers are so constructed that hive and humble-bees,

which visit them incessantly, almost always alight on the left

wing-petal, as they can best suck the nectar from this side. Their

weight and movements depress the petal, and this causes the stigma to

protrude from the spirally-wound keel, and a brush of hairs round the

stigma pushes out the pollen before it. The pollen adheres to the head

or proboscis of the bee which is at work, and is thus placed either on

the stigma of the same flower, or is carried to another flower. (5/4.

The flowers have been described by Delpino, and in an admirable manner

by Mr. Farrer in the ‘Annals and Magazine of Natural History’ volume 2

4th series October 1868 page 256. My son Francis has explained ‘Nature’

January 8, 1874 page 189, the use of one peculiarity in their structure,

namely, a little vertical projection on the single free stamen near its

base, which seems placed as if to guard the entrance into the two

nectar-holes in the staminal sheath. He shows that this projection

prevents the bees reaching the nectar, unless they go to the left side

of the flower, and it is absolutely necessary for cross-fertilisation

that they should alight on the left wing-petal.) Several years ago I

covered some plants under a large net, and these produced on one

occasion about one-third, and on another occasion about one-eighth, of

the number of pods which the same number of uncovered plants growing

close alongside produced. (5/5. ‘Gardeners’ Chronicle’ 1857 page 725 and

more especially ibid 1858 page 828. Also ‘Annals and Magazine of Natural

History’ 3rd series volume 2 1858 page 462.) This lessened fertility was

not caused by any injury from the net, as I moved the wing-petals of

several protected flowers, in the same manner as bees do, and these

produced remarkably fine pods. When the net was taken off, the flowers

were immediately visited by bees, and it was interesting to observe how

quickly the plants became covered with young pods. As the flowers are

much frequented by Thrips, the self-fertilisation of most of the flowers

under the net may have been due to the action of these minute insects.

Dr. Ogle likewise covered up a large portion of a plant, and “out of a

vast number of blossoms thus protected not a single one produced a pod,

while the unprotected blossoms were for the most part fruitful.” Mr.

Belt gives a more curious case; this plant grows well and flowers in

Nicaragua; but as none of the native bees visit the flowers, not a

single pod is ever produced. (5/6. Dr. Ogle ‘Popular Science Review’

1870 page 168. Mr. Belt ‘The Naturalist in Nicaragua’ 1874 page 70. The

latter author gives a case ‘Nature’ 1875 page 26, of a late crop of

Phaseolus multiflorus near London which “was rendered barren” by the

humble-bees cutting, as they frequently do, holes at the bases of the

flowers instead of entering them in the proper manner.)

From the facts now given we may feel nearly sure that individuals of the

same variety or of different varieties, if growing near each other and

in flower at the same time, would intercross; but I cannot myself

advance any direct evidence of such an occurrence, as only a single

variety is commonly cultivated in England. I have, however, received an

account from the Reverend W.A. Leighton, that plants raised by him from

ordinary seed produced seeds differing in an extraordinary manner in

colour and shape, leading to the belief that their parents must have

been crossed. In France M. Fermond more than once planted close together

varieties which ordinarily come true and which bear differently coloured

flowers and seeds; and the offspring thus raised varied so greatly that

there could hardly be a doubt that they had intercrossed. (5/7.

‘Fécondation chez les Végétaux’ 1859 pages 34-40. He adds that M.

Villiers has described a spontaneous hybrid, which he calls Phaseolus

coccineus hybridus, in the ‘Annales de la Soc. R. de Horticulture’ June

1844.) On the other hand, Professor H. Hoffman does not believe in the

natural crossing of the varieties; for although seedlings raised from

two varieties growing close together produced plants which yielded seeds

of a mixed character, he found that this likewise occurred with plants

separated by a space of from 40 to 150 paces from any other variety; he

therefore attributes the mixed character of the seed to spontaneous

variability. (5/8. ‘Bestimmung des Werthes von Species und Varietat’

1869 pages 47-72.) But the above distance would be very far from

sufficient to prevent intercrossing: cabbages have been known to cross

at several times this distance; and the careful Gartner gives many

instances of plants growing at from 600 to 800 yards apart fertilising

one another. (5/9. ‘Kenntnis der Befruchtung’ 1844 pages 573, 577.)

Professor Hoffman even maintains that the flowers of the kidney-bean are

specially adapted for self-fertilisation. He enclosed several flowers in

bags; and as the buds often dropped off, he attributes the partial

sterility of these flowers to the injurious effects of the bags, and not

to the exclusion of insects. But the only safe method of experimenting

is to cover up a whole plant, which then never suffers.

Self-fertilised seeds were obtained by moving up and down in the same

manner as bees do the wing-petals of flowers protected by a net; and

crossed seeds were obtained by crossing two of the plants under the same

net. The seeds after germinating on sand were planted on the opposite

sides of two large pots, and equal-sized sticks were given them to twine

up. When 8 inches in height, the plants on the two sides were equal. The

crossed plants flowered before the self-fertilised in both pots. As soon

as one of each pair had grown to the summit of its stick both were

measured.

TABLE 5/53. Phaseolus multiflorus.

Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot.

Column 2: Crossed Plants.

Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants.

Pot 1 : 87 : 84 6/8.

Pot 1 : 88 : 87.

Pot 1 : 82 4/8 : 76.

Pot 2 : 90 : 76 4/8.

Pot 2 : 82 4/8 : 87 4/8.

Total : 430.00 : 411.75.

The average height of the five crossed plants is 86 inches, and that of

the five self-fertilised plants 82.35; or as 100 to 96. The pots were

kept in the greenhouse, and there was little or no difference in the

fertility of the two lots. Therefore as far as these few observations

serve, the advantage gained by a cross is very small.

Phaseolus vulgaris.

With respect to this species, I merely ascertained that the flowers were

highly fertile when insects were excluded, as indeed must be the case,

for the plants are often forced during the winter when no insects are

present. Some plants of two varieties (namely Canterbury and Fulmer’s

Forcing Bean) were covered with a net, and they seemed to produce as

many pods, containing as many beans, as some uncovered plants growing

alongside; but neither the pods nor the beans were actually counted.

This difference in self-fertility between Phaseolus vulgaris and

multifloris is remarkable, as these two species are so closely related

that Linnaeus thought that they formed one. When the varieties of

Phaseolus vulgaris grow near one another in the open ground, they

sometimes cross largely, notwithstanding their capacity for

self-fertilisation. Mr. Coe has given me a remarkable instance of this

fact with respect to the negro and a white-seeded and a brown-seeded

variety, which were all grown together. The diversity of character in

the seedlings of the second generation raised by me from his plants was

wonderful. I could add other analogous cases, and the fact is well-known

to gardeners. (5/10. I have given Mr. Coe’s case in the ‘Gardeners’

Chronicle’ 1858 page 829. See also for another case ibid page 845.)

Lathyrus odoratus.

Almost everyone who has studied the structure of papilionaceous flowers

has been convinced that they are specially adapted for

cross-fertilisation, although many of the species are likewise capable

of self-fertilisation. The case therefore of Lathyrus odoratus or the

sweet-pea is curious, for in this country it seems invariably to

fertilise itself. I conclude that this is so, as five varieties,

differing greatly in the colour of their flowers but in no other

respect, are commonly sold and come true; yet on inquiry from two great

raisers of seed for sale, I find that they take no precautions to insure

purity--the five varieties being habitually grown close together. (5/11.

See Mr. W. Earley in ‘Nature’ 1872 page 242, to the same effect. He

once, however, saw bees visiting the flowers, and supposed that on this

occasion they would have been intercrossed.) I have myself purposely

made similar trials with the same result. Although the varieties always

come true, yet, as we shall presently see, one of the five well-known

varieties occasionally gives birth to another, which exhibits all its

usual characters. Owing to this curious fact, and to the darker-coloured

varieties being the most productive, these increase, to the exclusion of

the others, as I was informed by the late Mr. Masters, if there be no

selection.

In order to ascertain what would be the effect of crossing two

varieties, some flowers on the Purple sweet-pea, which has a dark

reddish-purple standard-petal with violet-coloured wing-petals and keel,

were castrated whilst very young, and were fertilised with pollen of the

Painted Lady. This latter variety has a pale cherry-coloured standard,

with almost white wings and keel. On two occasions I raised from a

flower thus crossed plants perfectly resembling both parent-forms; but

the greater number resembled the paternal variety. So perfect was the

resemblance, that I should have suspected some mistake in the label, had

not the plants, which were at first identical in appearance with the

father or Painted Lady, later in the season produced flowers blotched

and streaked with dark purple. This is an interesting example of partial

reversion in the same individual plant as it grows older. The

purple-flowered plants were thrown away, as they might possibly have

been the product of the accidental self-fertilisation of the

mother-plant, owing to the castration not having been effectual. But the

plants which resembled in the colour of their flowers the paternal

variety or Painted Lady were preserved, and their seeds saved. Next

summer many plants were raised from these seeds, and they generally

resembled their grandfather the Painted Lady, but most of them had their

wing-petals streaked and stained with dark pink; and a few had pale

purple wings with the standard of a darker crimson than is natural to

the Painted Lady, so that they formed a new sub-variety. Amongst these

plants a single one appeared having purple flowers like those of the

grandmother, but with the petals slightly streaked with a paler tint:

this was thrown away. Seeds were again saved from the foregoing plants,

and the seedlings thus raised still resembled the Painted Lady, or

great-grandfather; but they now varied much, the standard petal varying

from pale to dark red, in a few instances with blotches of white; and

the wing-petals varied from nearly white to purple, the keel being in

all nearly white.

As no variability of this kind can be detected in plants raised from

seeds, the parents of which have grown during many successive

generations in close proximity, we may infer that they cannot have

intercrossed. What does occasionally occur is that in a row of plants

raised from seeds of one variety, another variety true of its kind

appears; for instance, in a long row of Scarlets (the seeds of which had

been carefully gathered from Scarlets for the sake of this experiment)

two Purples and one Painted Lady appeared. Seeds from these three

aberrant plants were saved and sown in separate beds. The seedlings from

both the Purples were chiefly Purples, but with some Painted Ladies and

some Scarlets. The seedlings from the aberrant Painted Lady were chiefly

Painted Ladies with some Scarlets. Each variety, whatever its parentage

may have been, retained all its characters perfect, and there was no

streaking or blotching of the colours, as in the foregoing plants of

crossed origin. Another variety, however, is often sold, which is

striped and blotched with dark purple; and this is probably of crossed

origin, for I found, as well as Mr. Masters, that it did not transmit

its characters at all truly.

From the evidence now given, we may conclude that the varieties of the

sweet-pea rarely or never intercross in this country; and this is a

highly remarkable fact, considering, firstly, the general structure of

the flowers; secondly, the large quantity of pollen produced, far more

than is requisite for self-fertilisation; and thirdly, the occasional

visit of insects. That insects should sometimes fail to cross-fertilise

the flowers is intelligible, for I have thrice seen humble-bees of two

kinds, as well as hive-bees, sucking the nectar, and they did not

depress the keel-petals so as to expose the anthers and stigma; they

were therefore quite inefficient for fertilising the flowers. One of

these bees, namely, Bombus lapidarius, stood on one side at the base of

the standard and inserted its proboscis beneath the single separate

stamen, as I afterwards ascertained by opening the flower and finding

this stamen prised up. Bees are forced to act in this manner from the

slit in the staminal tube being closely covered by the broad membranous

margin of the single stamen, and from the tube not being perforated by

nectar-passages. On the other hand, in the three British species of

Lathyrus which I have examined, and in the allied genus Vicia, two

nectar-passages are present. Therefore British bees might well be

puzzled how to act in the case of the sweet-pea. I may add that the

staminal tube of another exotic species, Lathyrus grandiflorus, is not

perforated by nectar-passages, and this species has rarely set any pods

in my garden, unless the wing-petals were moved up and down, in the same

manner as bees ought to do; and then pods were generally formed, but

from some cause often dropped off afterwards. One of my sons caught an

elephant sphinx-moth whilst visiting the flowers of the sweet-pea, but

this insect would not depress the wing-petals and keel. On the other

hand, I have seen on one occasion hive-bees, and two or three occasions

the Megachile willughbiella in the act of depressing the keel; and these

bees had the under sides of their bodies thickly covered with pollen,

and could not thus fail to carry pollen from one flower to the stigma of

another. Why then do not the varieties occasionally intercross, though

this would not often happen, as insects so rarely act in an efficient

manner? The fact cannot, as it appears, be explained by the flowers

being self-fertilised at a very early age; for although nectar is

sometimes secreted and pollen adheres to the viscid stigma before the

flowers are fully expanded, yet in five young flowers which were

examined by me the pollen-tubes were not exserted. Whatever the cause

may be, we may conclude, that in England the varieties never or very

rarely intercross. But it does not follow from this, that they would not

be cross by the aid of other and larger insects in their native country,

which in botanical works is said to be the south of Europe and the East

Indies. Accordingly I wrote to Professor Delpino, in Florence, and he

informs me “that it is the fixed opinion of gardeners there that the

varieties do intercross, and that they cannot be preserved pure unless

they are sown separately.”

It follows also from the foregoing facts that the several varieties of

the sweet-pea must have propagated themselves in England by

self-fertilisation for very many generations, since the time when each

new variety first appeared. From the analogy of the plants of Mimulus

and Ipomoea, which had been self-fertilised for several generations, and

from trials previously made with the common pea, which is in nearly the

same state as the sweet-pea, it appeared to me very improbable that a

cross between the individuals of the same variety would benefit the

offspring. A cross of this kind was therefore not tried, which I now

regret. But some flowers of the Painted Lady, castrated at an early age,

were fertilised with pollen from the Purple sweet-pea; and it should be

remembered that these varieties differ in nothing except in the colour

of their flowers. The cross was manifestly effectual (though only two

seeds were obtained), as was shown by the two seedlings, when they

flowered, closely resembling their father, the Purple pea, excepting

that they were a little lighter coloured, with their keels slightly

streaked with pale purple. Seeds from flowers spontaneously

self-fertilised under a net were at the same time saved from the same

mother-plant, the Painted Lady. These seeds unfortunately did not

germinate on sand at the same time with the crossed seeds, so that they

could not be planted simultaneously. One of the two crossed seeds in a

state of germination was planted in a pot (Number 1) in which a

self-fertilised seed in the same state had been planted four days

before, so that this latter seedling had a great advantage over the

crossed one. In Pot 2 the other crossed seed was planted two days before

a self-fertilised one; so that here the crossed seedling had a

considerable advantage over the self-fertilised one. But this crossed

seedling had its summit gnawed off by a slug, and was in consequence for

a time quite beaten by the self-fertilised plant. Nevertheless I allowed

it to remain, and so great was its constitutional vigour that it

ultimately beat its uninjured self-fertilised rival. When all four

plants were almost fully grown they were measured, as here shown:--

TABLE 5/54. Lathyrus odoratus.

Heights of plants measured in inches.

Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot.

Column 2: Crossed Plants.

Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants.

Pot 1 : 80 : 64 4/8.

Pot 2 : 78 4/8 : 63.

Total : 158.5 : 127.5.

The two crossed plants here average 79.25, and the two self-fertilised

63.75 inches in height, or as 100 to 80. Six flowers on these two

crossed plants were reciprocally crossed with pollen from the other

plant, and the six pods thus produced contained on an average six peas,

with a maximum in one of seven. Eighteen spontaneously self-fertilised

pods from the Painted Lady, which, as already stated, had no doubt been

self-fertilised for many previous generations, contained on an average

only 3.93 peas, with a maximum in one of five peas; so that the number

of peas in the crossed and self-fertilised pods was as 100 to 65. The

self-fertilised peas were, however, quite as heavy as those from the

crossed pods. From these two lots of seeds, the plants of the next

generation were raised.

PLANTS OF THE SECOND GENERATION.

Many of the self-fertilised peas just referred to germinated on sand

before any of the crossed ones, and were rejected. As soon as I got

equal pairs, they were planted on the opposite sides of two large pots,

which were kept in the greenhouse. The seedlings thus raised were the

grandchildren of the Painted Lady, which was first crossed by the Purple

variety. When the two lots were from 4 to 6 inches in height there was

no difference between them. Nor was there any marked difference in the

period of their flowering. When fully grown they were measured, as

follows:--

TABLE 5/55. Lathyrus odoratus (Second Generation).

Heights of plants measured in inches.

Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot.

Column 2: Seedlings from Plants Crossed during the two previous

Generations.

Column 3: Seedlings from Plants Self-fertilised during many previous

Generations.

Pot 1 : 72 4/8 : 57 4/8.

Pot 1 : 71 : 67.

Pot 1 : 52 2/8 : 56 2/8.

Pot 2 : 81 4/8 : 66 2/8.

Pot 2 : 45 2/8 : 38 7/8.

Pot 2 : 55 : 46.

Total : 377.50 : 331.86.

The average height of the six crossed plants is here 62.91, and that of

the six self-fertilised 55.31 inches; or as 100 to 88. There was not

much difference in the fertility of the two lots; the crossed plants

having produced in the greenhouse thirty-five pods, and the

self-fertilised thirty-two pods.

Seeds were saved from the self-fertilised flowers on these two lots of

plants, for the sake of ascertaining whether the seedlings thus raised

would inherit any difference in growth or vigour. It must therefore be

understood that both lots in the following trial are plants of

self-fertilised parentage; but that in the one lot the plants were the

children of plants which had been crossed during two previous

generations, having been before that self-fertilised for many

generations; and that in the other lot they were the children of plants

which had not been crossed for very many previous generations. The seeds

germinated on sand and were planted in pairs on the opposite sides of

four pots. They were measured, when fully grown, with the following

result:--

TABLE 5/56. Lathyrus odoratus.

Heights of plants measured in inches.

Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot.

Column 2: Self-fertilised Plants from Crossed Plants.

Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants from Self-fertilised Plants.

Pot 1 : 72 : 65.

Pot 1 : 72 : 61 4/8.

Pot 2 : 58 : 64.

Pot 2 : 68 : 68 2/8.

Pot 2 : 72 4/8 : 56 4/8.

Pot 3 : 81 : 60 2/8.

Pot 4 : 77 4/8 : 76 4/8.

Total : 501 : 452.

The average height of the seven self-fertilised plants, the offspring of

crossed plants, is 71.57, and that of the seven self-fertilised plants,

the offspring of self-fertilised plants, is 64.57; or as 100 to 90. The

self-fertilised plants from the self-fertilised produced rather more

pods--namely, thirty-six--than the self-fertilised plants from the

crossed, for these produced only thirty-one pods.

A few seeds of the same two lots were sown in the opposite corners of a

large box in which a Brugmansia had long been growing, and in which the

soil was so exhausted that seeds of Ipomoea purpurea would hardly

vegetate; yet the two plants of the sweet-pea which were raised

flourished well. For a long time the self-fertilised plant from the

self-fertilised beat the self-fertilised plant from the crossed plant;

the former flowered first, and was at one time 77 1/2 inches, whilst the

latter was only 68 1/2 in height; but ultimately the plant from the

previous cross showed its superiority and attained a height of 108 1/2

inches, whilst the other was only 95 inches. I also sowed some of the

same two lots of seeds in poor soil in a shady place in a shrubbery.

Here again the self-fertilised plants from the self-fertilised for a

long time exceeded considerably in height those from the previously

crossed plants; and this may probably be attributed, in the present as

in the last case, to these seeds having germinated rather sooner than

those from the crossed plants; but at the close of the season the

tallest of the self-fertilised plants from the crossed plants was 30

inches, whilst the tallest of the self-fertilised from the

self-fertilised was 29 3/8 inches in height.

From the various facts now given we see that plants derived from a cross

between two varieties of the sweet-pea, which differ in no respect

except in the colour of their flowers, exceed considerably in height the

offspring from self-fertilised plants, both in the first and second

generations. The crossed plants also transmit their superiority in

height and vigour to their self-fertilised offspring.

Pisum sativum.

The common pea is perfectly fertile when its flowers are protected from

the visits of insects; I ascertained this with two or three different

varieties, as did Dr. Ogle with another. But the flowers are likewise

adapted for cross-fertilisation; Mr. Farrer specifies the following

points, namely: “The open blossom displaying itself in the most

attractive and convenient position for insects; the conspicuous

vexillum; the wings forming an alighting place; the attachment of the

wings to the keel, by which any body pressing on the former must press

down the latter; the staminal tube enclosing nectar, and affording by

means of its partially free stamen with apertures on each side of its

base an open passage to an insect seeking the nectar; the moist and

sticky pollen placed just where it will be swept out of the apex of the

keel against the entering insect; the stiff elastic style so placed that

on a pressure being applied to the keel it will be pushed upwards out of

the keel; the hairs on the style placed on that side of the style only

on which there is space for the pollen, and in such a direction as to

sweep it out; and the stigma so placed as to meet an entering

insect,--all these become correlated parts of one elaborate mechanism,

if we suppose that the fertilisation of these flowers is effected by the

carriage of pollen from one to the other.” (5/12. ‘Nature’ October 10,

1872 page 479. Hermann Muller gives an elaborate description of the

flowers ‘Befruchtung’ etc. page 247.) Notwithstanding these manifest

provisions for cross-fertilisation, varieties which have been cultivated

for very many successive generations in close proximity, although

flowering at the same time, remain pure. I have elsewhere given evidence

on this head, and if required could give more. (5/13. ‘Variation of

Animals and Plants under Domestication’ chapter 9 2nd edition volume 1

page 348.) There can hardly be a doubt that some of Knight’s varieties,

which were originally produced by an artificial cross and were very

vigorous, lasted for at least sixty years, and during all these years

were self-fertilised; for had it been otherwise, they would not have

kept true, as the several varieties are generally grown near together.

Most of the varieties, however, endure for a shorter period; and this

may be in part due to their weakness of constitution from long-continued

self-fertilisation.

It is remarkable, considering that the flowers secrete much nectar and

afford much pollen, how seldom they are visited by insects either in

England, or, as H. Muller remarks, in North Germany. I have observed the

flowers for the last thirty years, and in all this time have only thrice

seen bees of the proper kind at work (one of them being Bombus

muscorum), such as were sufficiently powerful to depress the keel, so as

to get the undersides of their bodies dusted with pollen. These bees

visited several flowers, and could hardly have failed to cross-fertilise

them. Hive-bees and other small kinds sometimes collect pollen from old

and already fertilised flowers, but this is of no account. The rarity of

the visits of efficient bees to this exotic plant is, I believe, the

chief cause of the varieties so seldom intercrossing. That a cross does

occasionally take place, as might be expected from what has just been

stated, is certain, from the recorded cases of the direct action of the

pollen of one variety on the seed-coats of another. (5/14. ‘Variation of

Animals and Plants under Domestication’ chapter 11 2nd edition volume 1

page 428.) The late Mr. Masters, who particularly attended to the

raising of new varieties of peas, was convinced that some of them had

originated from accidental crosses. But as such crosses are rare, the

old varieties would not often be thus deteriorated, more especially as

plants departing from the proper type are generally rejected by those

who collect seed for sale. There is another cause which probably tends

to render cross-fertilisation rare, namely, the early age at which the

pollen-tubes are exserted; eight flowers not fully expanded were

examined, and in seven of these the pollen-tubes were in this state; but

they had not as yet penetrated the stigma. Although so few insects visit

the flowers of the pea in this country or in North Germany, and although

the anthers seem here to open abnormally soon, it does not follow that

the species in its native country would be thus circumstanced.

Owing to the varieties having been self-fertilised for many generations,

and to their having been subjected in each generation to nearly the same

conditions (as will be explained in a future chapter) I did not expect

that a cross between two such plants would benefit the offspring; and so

it proved on trial. In 1867 I covered up several plants of the Early

Emperor pea, which was not then a very new variety, so that it must

already have been propagated by self-fertilisation for at least a dozen

generations. Some flowers were crossed with pollen from a distinct plant

growing in the same row, and others were allowed to fertilise themselves

under a net. The two lots of seeds thus obtained were sown on opposite

sides of two large pots, but only four pairs came up at the same time.

The pots were kept in the greenhouse. The seedlings of both lots when

between 6 and 7 inches in height were equal. When nearly full-grown they

were measured, as in Table 5/57.

TABLE 5/57. Pisum sativum.

Heights of plants measured in inches.

Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot.

Column 2: Crossed Plants.

Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants.

Pot 1 : 35 : 29 6/8.

Pot 2 : 31 4/8 : 51.

Pot 2 : 35 : 45.

Pot 2 : 37 : 33.

Total : 138.50 : 158.75.

The average height of the four crossed plants is here 34.62, and that of

the four self-fertilised plants 39.68, or as 100 to 115. So that the

crossed plants, far from beating the self-fertilised, were completely

beaten by them.

There can be no doubt that the result would have been widely different,

if any two varieties out of the numberless ones which exist had been

crossed. Notwithstanding that both had been self-fertilised for many

previous generations, each would almost certainly have possessed its own

peculiar constitution; and this degree of differentiation would have

been sufficient to make a cross highly beneficial. I have spoken thus

confidently of the benefit which would have been derived from crossing

any two varieties of the pea from the following facts: Andrew Knight in

speaking of the results of crossing reciprocally very tall and short

varieties, says, “I had in this experiment a striking instance of the

stimulative effects of crossing the breeds; for the smallest variety,

whose height rarely exceeded 2 feet, was increased to 6 feet; whilst the

height of the large and luxuriant kind was very little diminished.”

(5/15. ‘Philosophical Transactions’ 1799 page 200.) Recently Mr. Laxton

has made numerous crosses, and everyone had been astonished at the

vigour and luxuriance of the new varieties which he has thus raised and

afterwards fixed by selection. He gave me seed-peas produced from

crosses between four distinct kinds; and the plants thus raised were

extraordinarily vigorous, being in each case from 1 to 2 or even 3 feet

taller than the parent-forms, which were raised at the same time close

alongside. But as I did not measure their actual height I cannot give

the exact ratio, but it must have been at least as 100 to 75. A similar

trial was subsequently made with two other peas from a different cross,

and the result was nearly the same. For instance, a crossed seedling

between the Maple and Purple-podded pea was planted in poor soil and

grew to the extraordinary height of 116 inches; whereas the tallest

plant of either parent variety, namely, a Purple-podded pea, was only 70

inches in height; or as 100 to 60.

Sarothamnus scoparius.

Bees incessantly visit the flowers of the common Broom, and these are

adapted by a curious mechanism for cross-fertilisation. When a bee

alights on the wing-petals of a young flower, the keel is slightly

opened and the short stamens spring out, which rub their pollen against

the abdomen of the bee. If a rather older flower is visited for the

first time (or if the bee exerts great force on a younger flower), the

keel opens along its whole length, and the longer as well as the shorter

stamens, together with the much elongated curved pistil, spring forth

with violence. The flattened, spoon-like extremity of the pistil rests

for a time on the back of the bee, and leaves on it the load of pollen

with which it is charged. As soon as the bee flies away, the pistil

instantly curls round, so that the stigmatic surface is now upturned and

occupies a position, in which it would be rubbed against the abdomen of

another bee visiting the same flower. Thus, when the pistil first

escapes from the keel, the stigma is rubbed against the back of the bee,

dusted with pollen from the longer stamens, either of the same or

another flower; and afterwards against the lower surface of the bee

dusted with pollen from the shorter stamens, which is often shed a day

or two before that from the longer stamens. (5/16. These observations

have been quoted in an abbreviated form by the Reverend G. Henslow, in

the ‘Journal of Linnean Society Botany’ volume 9 1866 page 358. Hermann

Muller has since published a full and excellent account of the flower in

his ‘Befruchtung’ etc. page 240.) By this mechanism cross-fertilisation

is rendered almost inevitable, and we shall immediately see that pollen

from a distinct plant is more effective than that from the same flower.

I need only add that, according to H. Muller, the flowers do not secrete

nectar, and he thinks that bees insert their proboscides only in the

hope of finding nectar; but they act in this manner so frequently and

for so long a time that I cannot avoid the belief that they obtain

something palatable within the flowers.

If the visits of bees are prevented, and if the flowers are not dashed

by the wind against any object, the keel never opens, so that the

stamens and pistil remain enclosed. Plants thus protected yield very few

pods in comparison with those produced by neighbouring uncovered bushes,

and sometimes none at all. I fertilised a few flowers on a plant growing

almost in a state of nature with pollen from another plant close

alongside, and the four crossed capsules contained on an average 9.2

seeds. This large number no doubt was due to the bush being covered up,

and thus not exhausted by producing many pods; for fifty pods gathered

from an adjoining plant, the flowers of which had been fertilised by the

bees, contained an average of only 7.14 seeds. Ninety-three pods

spontaneously self-fertilised on a large bush which had been covered up,

but had been much agitated by the wind, contained an average of 2.93

seeds. Ten of the finest of these ninety-three capsules yielded an

average of 4.30 seeds, that is less than half the average number in the

four artificially crossed capsules. The ratio of 7.14 to 2.93, or as 100

to 41, is probably the fairest for the number of seeds per pod, yielded

by naturally-crossed and spontaneously self-fertilised flowers. The

crossed seeds compared with an equal number of the spontaneously

self-fertilised seeds were heavier, in the ratio of 100 to 88. We thus

see that besides the mechanical adaptations for cross-fertilisation, the

flowers are much more productive with pollen from a distinct plant than

with their own pollen.

Eight pairs of the above crossed and self-fertilised seeds, after they

had germinated on sand, were planted (1867) on the opposite sides of two

large pots. When several of the seedlings were an inch and a half in

height, there was no marked difference between the two lots. But even at

this early age the leaves of the self-fertilised seedlings were smaller

and of not so bright a green as those of the crossed seedlings. The pots

were kept in the greenhouse, and as the plants on the following spring

(1868) looked unhealthy and had grown but little, they were plunged,

still in their pots, into the open ground. The plants all suffered much

from the sudden change, especially the self-fertilised, and two of the

latter died. The remainder were measured, and I give the measurements in

Table 5/58, because I have not seen in any other species so great a

difference between the crossed and self-fertilised seedlings at so early

an age.

TABLE 5/58. Sarothamnus scoparius (very young plants).

Heights of plants measured in inches.

Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot.

Column 2: Crossed Plants.

Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants.

Pot 1 : 4 4/8 : 2 4/8.

Pot 1 : 6 : 1 4/8.

Pot 1 : 2 : 1.

Pot 2 : 2 : 1 4/8.

Pot 2 : 2 4/8 : 1.

Pot 2 : 0 4/8 : 0 4/8.

Total : 17.5 : 8.0.

The six crossed plants here average 2.91, and the six self-fertilised

1.33 inches in height; so that the former were more than twice as high

as the latter, or as 100 to 46.

In the spring of the succeeding year (1869) the three crossed plants in

Pot 1 had all grown to nearly a foot in height, and they had smothered

the three little self-fertilised plants so completely that two were

dead; and the third, only an inch and a half in height, was dying. It

should be remembered that these plants had been bedded out in their

pots, so that they were subjected to very severe competition. This pot

was now thrown away.

The six plants in Pot 2 were all alive. One of the self-fertilised was

an inch and a quarter taller than any one of the crossed plants; but the

other two self-fertilised plants were in a very poor condition. I

therefore resolved to leave these plants to struggle together for some

years. By the autumn of the same year (1869) the self-fertilised plant

which had been victorious was now beaten. The measurements are shown in

Table 5/59.

TABLE 5/59. Pot 2.--Sarothamnus scoparius.

Heights of plants measured in inches.

Column 1: Crossed Plants.

Column 2: Self-fertilised Plants.

: 15 6/8 : 13 1/8.

: 9 6/8 : 3.

: 8 2/8 : 2 4/8.

The same plants were again measured in the autumn of the following year,

1870.

TABLE 5/60. Pot 2.--Sarothamnus scoparius.

Heights of plants measured in inches.

Column 1: Crossed Plants.

Column 2: Self-fertilised Plants.

: 26 2/8 : 14 2/8.

: 16 4/8 : 11 4/8.

: 14 : 9 6/8.

Total : 56.75 : 35.50.

The three crossed plants now averaged 18.91, and the three

self-fertilised 11.83 inches in height; or as 100 to 63. The three

crossed plants in Pot 1, as already shown, had beaten the three

self-fertilised plants so completely, that any comparison between them

was superfluous.

The winter of 1870-1871 was severe. In the spring the three crossed

plants in Pot 2 had not even the tips of their shoots in the least

injured, whereas all three self-fertilised plants were killed half-way

down to the ground; and this shows how much more tender they were. In

consequence not one of these latter plants bore a single flower during

the ensuing summer of 1871, whilst all three crossed plants flowered.

Ononis minutissima.

This plant, of which seeds were sent me from North Italy, produces,

besides the ordinary papilionaceous flowers, minute, imperfect, closed

or cleistogene flowers, which can never be cross-fertilised, but are

highly self-fertile. Some of the perfect flowers were crossed with

pollen from a distinct plant, and six capsules thus produced yielded on

an average 3.66 seeds, with a maximum of five in one. Twelve perfect

flowers were marked and allowed to fertilise themselves spontaneously

under a net, and they yielded eight capsules, containing on an average

2.38 seeds, with a maximum of three seeds in one. So that the crossed

and self-fertilised capsules from the perfect flowers yielded seeds in

the proportion of 100 to 65. Fifty-three capsules produced by the

cleistogene flowers contained on an average 4.1 seeds, so that these

were the most productive of all; and the seeds themselves looked finer

even than those from the crossed perfect flowers.

The seeds from the crossed perfect flowers and from the self-fertilised

cleistogene flowers were allowed to germinate on sand; but unfortunately

only two pairs germinated at the same time. These were planted on the

opposite sides of the same pot, which was kept in the greenhouse. In the

summer of the same year, when the seedlings were about 4 1/2 inches in

height, the two lots were equal. In the autumn of the following year

(1868) the two crossed plants were of exactly the same height, namely,

11 4/8 inches, and the two self-fertilised plants 12 6/8 and 7 2/8

inches; so that one of the self-fertilised exceeded considerably in

height all the others. By the autumn of 1869 the two crossed plants had

acquired the supremacy; their height being 16 4/8 and 15 1/8, whilst

that of the two self-fertilised plants was 14 5/8 and 11 4/8 inches.

By the autumn of 1870, the heights were as follows:--

TABLE 5/61. Ononis minutissima.

Heights of plants measured in inches.

Column 1: Crossed Plants.

Column 2: Self-fertilised Plants.

: 20 3/8 : 17 4/8.

: 19 2/8 : 17 2/8.

Total : 39.63 : 34.75.

So that the mean height of the two crossed plants was 19.81, and that of

the two self-fertilised 17.37 inches; or as 100 to 88. It should be

remembered that the two lots were at first equal in height; that one of

the self-fertilised plants then had the advantage, the two crossed

plants being at last victorious.]

SUMMARY ON THE LEGUMINOSAE.

Six genera in this family were experimented on, and the results are in

some respects remarkable. The crossed plants of the two species of

Lupinus were conspicuously superior to the self-fertilised plants in

height and fertility; and when grown under very unfavourable conditions,

in vigour. The scarlet-runner (Phaseolus multiflorus) is partially

sterile if the visits of bees are prevented, and there is reason to

believe that varieties growing near one another intercross. The five

crossed plants, however, exceeded in height the five self-fertilised

only by a little. Phaseolus vulgaris is perfectly self-sterile;

nevertheless, varieties growing in the same garden sometimes intercross

largely. The varieties of Lathyrus odoratus, on the other hand, appear

never to intercross in this country; and though the flowers are not

often visited by efficient insects, I cannot account for this fact, more

especially as the varieties are believed to intercross in North Italy.

Plants raised from a cross between two varieties, differing only in the

colour of their flowers, grew much taller and were under unfavourable

conditions more vigorous than the self-fertilised plants; they also

transmitted, when self-fertilised, their superiority to their offspring.

The many varieties of the common Pea (Pisum sativum), though growing in

close proximity, very seldom intercross; and this seems due to the

rarity in this country of the visits of bees sufficiently powerful to

effect cross-fertilisation. A cross between the self-fertilised

individuals of the same variety does no good whatever to the offspring;

whilst a cross between distinct varieties, though closely allied, does

great good, of which we have excellent evidence. The flowers of the

Broom (Sarothamnus) are almost sterile if they are not disturbed and if

insects are excluded. The pollen from a distinct plant is more effective

than that from the same flower in producing seeds. The crossed seedlings

have an enormous advantage over the self-fertilised when grown together

in close competition. Lastly, only four plants of the Ononis minutissima

were raised; but as these were observed during their whole growth, the

advantage of the crossed over the self-fertilised plants may, I think,

be fully trusted.

[15. ONAGRACEAE.--Clarkia elegans.

Owing to the season being very unfavourable (1867), few of the flowers

which I fertilised formed capsules; twelve crossed flowers produced only

four, and eighteen self-fertilised flowers yielded only one capsule. The

seeds after germinating on sand were planted in three pots, but all the

self-fertilised plants died in one of them. When the two lots were

between 4 and 5 inches in height, the crossed began to show a slight

superiority over the self-fertilised. When in full flower they were

measured, with the following result:--

TABLE 5/62. Clarkia elegans.

Heights of plants measured in inches.

Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot.

Column 2: Crossed Plants.

Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants.

Pot 1 : 40 4/8 : 33.

Pot 1 : 35 : 24.

Pot 1 : 25 : 23.

Pot 2 : 33 4/8 : 30 4/8.

Total : 134.0 : 110.5.

The average height of the four crossed plants is 33.5, and that of the

four self-fertilised plants 27.62 inches, or as 100 to 82. The crossed

plants altogether produced 105 and the self-fertilised plants 63

capsules; or as 100 to 60. In both pots a self-fertilised plant flowered

before any one of the crossed plants.

16. LOASACEAE.--Bartonia aurea.

Some flowers were crossed and self-fertilised in the usual manner during

two seasons; but as I reared on the first occasion only two pairs, the

results are given together. On both occasions the crossed capsules

contained slightly more seeds than the self-fertilised. During the first

year, when the plants were about 7 inches in height, the self-fertilised

were the tallest, and in the second year the crossed were the tallest.

When the two lots were in full flower they were measured, as in Table

5/63.

TABLE 5/63. Bartonia aurea.

Heights of plants measured in inches.

Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot.

Column 2: Crossed Plants.

Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants.

Pot 1 : 31 : 37.

Pot 2 : 18 4/8 : 20 4/8.

Pot 3 : 19 4/8 : 40 4/8.

Pot 4 : 25 : 35.

Pot 4 : 36 : 15 4/8.

Pot 5 : 31 : 18.

Pot 5 : 16 : 11 4/8.

Pot 6 : 20 : 32 4/8.

Total : 197.0 : 210.5.

The average height of the eight crossed plants is 24.62, and that of the

eight self-fertilised 26.31 inches; or as 100 to 107. So that the

self-fertilised had a decided advantage over the crossed. But the plants

from some cause never grew well, and finally became so unhealthy that

only three crossed and three self-fertilised plants survived to set any

capsules, and these were few in number. The two lots seemed to be about

equally unproductive.

17. PASSIFLORACEAE.--Passiflora gracilis.

This annual species produces spontaneously numerous fruits when insects

are excluded, and behaves in this respect very differently from most of

the other species in the genus, which are extremely sterile unless

fertilised with pollen from a distinct plant. (5/17. ‘Variation of

Animals and Plants under Domestication’ chapter 17 2nd edition volume 2

page 118.) Fourteen fruits from crossed flowers contained on an average

24.14 seeds. Fourteen fruits (two poor ones being rejected),

spontaneously self-fertilised under a net, contained on an average 20.58

seeds per fruit; or as 100 to 85. These seeds were sown on the opposite

sides of three pots, but only two pairs came up at the same time; and

therefore a fair judgment cannot be formed.

TABLE 5/64. Passiflora gracilis.

Heights of plants measured in inches.

Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot.

Column 2: Crossed Plants.

Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants.

Pot 1 : 56 : 38.

Pot 2 : 42 : 64.

Total : 98 : 102.

The mean of the two crossed is 49 inches, and that of the two

self-fertilised 51 inches; or as 100 to 104.

18. UMBELLIFERAE.--Apium petroselinum.

The Umbelliferae are proterandrous, and can hardly fail to be

cross-fertilised by the many flies and small Hymenoptera which visit the

flowers. (5/18. Hermann Muller ‘Befruchtung’ etc. page 96. According to

M. Mustel as stated by Godron ‘De l’espèce’ tome 2 page 58 1859,

varieties of the carrot growing near each other readily intercross.) A

plant of the common parsley was covered by a net, and it apparently

produced as many and as fine spontaneously self-fertilised fruits or

seeds as the adjoining uncovered plants. The flowers on the latter were

visited by so many insects that they must have received pollen from one

another. Some of these two lots of seeds were left on sand, but nearly

all the self-fertilised seeds germinated before the others, so that I

was forced to throw all away. The remaining seeds were then sown on the

opposite sides of four pots. At first the self-fertilised seedlings were

a little taller in most of the pots than the naturally crossed

seedlings, and this no doubt was due to the self-fertilised seeds having

germinated first. But in the autumn all the plants were so equal that it

did not seem worth while to measure them. In two of the pots they were

absolutely equal; in a third, if there was any difference, it was in

favour of the crossed plants, and in a somewhat plainer manner in the

fourth pot. But neither side had any substantial advantage over the

other; so that in height they may be said to be as 100 to 100.

19. DIPSACEAE.--Scabiosa atro-purpurea.

The flowers, which are proterandrous, were fertilised during the

unfavourable season of 1867, so that I got few seeds, especially from

the self-fertilised heads, which were extremely sterile. The crossed and

self-fertilised plants raised from these seeds were measured before they

were in full flower, as in Table 5/65.

TABLE 5/65. Scabiosa atro-purpurea.

Heights of plants measured in inches.

Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot.

Column 2: Crossed Plants.

Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants.

Pot 1 : 14 : 20.

Pot 2 : 15 : 14 4/8.

Pot 3 : 21 : 14.

Pot 3 : 18 4/8 : 13.

Total : 68.5 : 61.5.

The four crossed plants averaged 17.12, and the four self-fertilised

15.37 inches in height; or as 100 to 90. One of the self-fertilised

plants in Pot 3 was killed by an accident, and its fellow pulled up; so

that when they were again measured to the summits of their flowers,

there were only three on each side; the crossed now averaged in height

32.83, and the self-fertilised 30.16 inches; or as 100 to 92.

20. COMPOSITAE.--Lactuca sativa. (5/19. The Compositae are well-adapted

for cross-fertilisation, but a nurseryman on whom I can rely, told me

that he had been in the habit of sowing several kinds of lettuce near

together for the sake of seed, and had never observed that they became

crossed. It is very improbable that all the varieties which were thus

cultivated near together flowered at different times; but two which I

selected by hazard and sowed near each other did not flower at the same

time; and my trial failed.)

Three plants of Lettuce (Great London Cos var.) grew close together in

my garden; one was covered by a net, and produced self-fertilised seeds,

the other two were allowed to be naturally crossed by insects; but the

season (1867) was unfavourable, and I did not obtain many seeds. Only

one crossed and one self-fertilised plant were raised in Pot 1, and

their measurements are given in Table 5/66. The flowers on this one

self-fertilised plant were again self-fertilised under a net, not with

pollen from the same floret, but from other florets on the same head.

The flowers on the two crossed plants were left to be crossed by

insects, but the process was aided by some pollen being occasionally

transported by me from plant to plant. These two lots of seeds, after

germinating on sand, were planted in pairs on the opposite sides of Pots

2 and 3, which were at first kept in the greenhouse and then turned out

of doors. The plants were measured when in full flower. Table 5/66,

therefore, includes plants belonging to two generations. When the

seedlings of the two lots were only 5 or 6 inches in height they were

equal. In Pot 3 one of the self-fertilised plants died before flowering,

as has occurred in so many other cases.

TABLE 5/66. Lactuca sativa.

Heights of plants measured in inches.

Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot.

Column 2: Crossed Plants.

Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants.

Pot 1 : 27 : 21 4/8.

Pot 1 : 25 : 20.

First generation, planted in open ground.

Pot 2 : 29 4/8 : 24.

Pot 2 : 17 4/8 : 10.

Pot 2 : 12 4/8 : 11.

Second generation, planted in open ground.

Pot 3 : 14 : 9 4/8.

Pot 3 : 10 4/8 : 0.

Second generation, kept in the pot.

Total : 136 : 96.

The average height of the seven crossed plants is 19.43, and that of the

six self-fertilised plants 16 inches; or as 100 to 82.

21. CAMPANULACEAE.--Specularia speculum.

In the closely allied genus, Campanula, in which Specularia was formerly

included, the anthers shed at an early period their pollen, and this

adheres to the collecting hairs which surround the pistil beneath the

stigma; so that without some mechanical aid the flowers cannot be

fertilised. For instance, I covered up a plant of Campanula carpathica,

and it did not produce a single capsule, whilst the surrounding

uncovered plants seeded profusely. On the other hand, the present

species of Specularia appears to set almost as many capsules when

covered up, as when left to the visits of the Diptera, which, as far as

I have seen, are the only insects that frequent the flowers. (5/20. It

has long been known that another species of the genus, Specularia

perfoliata, produces cleistogene as well as perfect flowers, and the

former are of course self-fertile.) I did not ascertain whether the

naturally crossed and spontaneously self-fertilised capsules contained

an equal number of seeds, but a comparison of artificially crossed and

self-fertilised flowers, showed that the former were probably the most

productive. It appears that this plant is capable of producing a large

number of self-fertilised capsules owing to the petals closing at night,

as well as during cold weather. In the act of closing, the margins of

the petals become reflexed, and their inwardly projecting midribs then

pass between the clefts of the stigma, and in doing so push the pollen

from the outside of the pistil on to the stigmatic surfaces. (5/21. Mr.

Meehan has lately shown ‘Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Science

Philadelphia’ May 16, 1876 page 84, that the closing of the flowers of

Claytonia virginica and Ranunculus bulbosus during the night causes

their self-fertilisation.)

Twenty flowers were fertilised by me with their own pollen, but owing to

the bad season, only six capsules were produced; they contained on an

average 21.7 seeds, with a maximum of forty-eight in one. Fourteen

flowers were crossed with pollen from another plant, and these produced

twelve capsules, containing on an average 30 seeds, with a maximum in

one of fifty-seven seeds; so that the crossed seeds were to the

self-fertilised from an equal number of capsules as 100 to 72. The

former were also heavier than an equal number of self-fertilised seeds,

in the ratio of 100 to 86. Thus, whether we judge by the number of

capsules produced from an equal number of flowers, or by the average

number of the contained seeds, or the maximum number in any one capsule,

or by their weight, crossing does great good in comparison with

self-fertilisation. The two lots of seeds were sown on the opposite

sides of four pots; but the seedlings were not sufficiently thinned.

Only the tallest plant on each side was measured, when fully grown. The

measurements are given in Table 5/67. In all four pots the crossed

plants flowered first. When the seedlings were only about an inch and a

half in height both lots were equal.

TABLE 5/67. Specularia speculum.

Heights of plants measured in inches.

Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot.

Column 2: Tallest Crossed Plant in each Pot.

Column 3: Tallest Self-fertilised Plant in each Pot.

Pot 1 : 18 : 15 6/8.

Pot 2 : 17 : 19.

Pot 3 : 22 1/8 : 18.

Pot 4 : 20 : 23.

Total : 77.13 : 75.75.

The four tallest crossed plants averaged 19.28, and the four tallest

self-fertilised 18.93 inches in height; or as 100 to 98. So that there

was no difference worth speaking of between the two lots in height;

though other great advantages are derived, as we have seen, from

cross-fertilisation. From being grown in pots and kept in the

greenhouse, none of the plants produced any capsules.

Lobelia ramosa. (5/22. I have adopted the name given to this plant in

the ‘Gardeners’ Chronicle’ 1866. Professor T. Dyer, however, informs me

that it probably is a white variety of L. tenuior of R. Brown, from W.

Australia.)

VAR. SNOW-FLAKE.

The well-adapted means by which cross-fertilisation is ensured in this

genus have been described by several authors. (5/23. See the works of

Hildebrand and Delpino. Mr. Farrer also has given a remarkably clear

description of the mechanism by which cross-fertilisation is effected in

this genus, in the ‘Annals and Magazine of Natural History’ volume 2 4th

series 1868 page 260. In the allied genus Isotoma, the curious spike

which projects rectangularly from the anthers, and which when shaken

causes the pollen to fall on the back of an entering insect, seems to

have been developed from a bristle, like one of those which spring from

the anthers in some of or all the species of Lobelia, as described by

Mr. Farrer.) The pistil as it slowly increases in length pushes the

pollen out of the conjoined anthers, by the aid of a ring of bristles;

the two lobes of the stigma being at this time closed and incapable of

fertilisation. The extrusion of the pollen is also aided by insects,

which rub against the little bristles that project from the anthers. The

pollen thus pushed out is carried by insects to the older flowers, in

which the stigma of the now freely projecting pistil is open and ready

to be fertilised. I proved the importance of the gaily-coloured corolla,

by cutting off the large flowers of Lobelia erinus; and these flowers

were neglected by the hive-bees which were incessantly visiting the

other flowers.

A capsule was obtained by crossing a flower of L. ramosa with pollen

from another plant, and two other capsules from artificially

self-fertilised flowers. The contained seeds were sown on the opposite

sides of four pots. Some of the crossed seedlings which came up before

the others had to be pulled up and thrown away. Whilst the plants were

very small there was not much difference in height between the two lots;

but in Pot 3 the self-fertilised were for a time the tallest. When in

full flower the tallest plant on each side of each pot was measured, and

the result is shown in Table 5/68. In all four pots a crossed plant

flowered before any one of its opponents.

TABLE 5/68. Lobelia ramosa (First Generation).

Heights of plants measured in inches.

Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot.

Column 2: Tallest Crossed Plant in each Pot.

Column 3: Tallest Self-fertilised Plant in each Pot.

Pot 1 : 22 4/8 : 17 4/8.

Pot 2 : 27 4/8 : 24.

Pot 3 : 16 4/8 : 15.

Pot 4 : 22 4/8 : 17.

Total : 89.0 : 73.5.

The four tallest crossed plants averaged 22.25, and the four tallest

self-fertilised 18.37 inches in height; or as 100 to 82. I was surprised

to find that the anthers of a good many of these self-fertilised plants

did not cohere and did not contain any pollen; and the anthers even of a

very few of the crossed plants were in the same condition. Some flowers

on the crossed plants were again crossed, four capsules being thus

obtained; and some flowers on the self-fertilised plants were again

self-fertilised, seven capsules being thus obtained. The seeds from both

lots were weighed, and it was calculated that an equal number of

capsules would have yielded seed in the proportion by weight of 100 for

the crossed to 60 for the self-fertilised capsules. So that the flowers

on the crossed plants again crossed were much more fertile than those on

the self-fertilised plants again self-fertilised.

PLANTS OF THE SECOND GENERATION.

The above two lots of seeds were placed on damp sand, and many of the

crossed seeds germinated, as on the last occasion, before the

self-fertilised, and were rejected. Three or four pairs in the same

state of germination were planted on the opposite sides of two pots; a

single pair in a third pot; and all the remaining seeds were sown

crowded in a fourth pot. When the seedlings were about one and a half

inches in height, they were equal on both sides of the three first pots;

but in Pot 4, in which they grew crowded and were thus exposed to severe

competition, the crossed were about a third taller than the

self-fertilised. In this latter pot, when the crossed averaged 5 inches

in height, the self-fertilised were about 4 inches; nor did they look

nearly such fine plants. In all four pots the crossed plants flowered

some days before the self-fertilised. When in full flower the tallest

plant on each side was measured; but before this time the single crossed

plant in Pot 3, which was taller than its antagonist, had died and was

not measured. So that only the tallest plant on each side of three pots

was measured, as in Table 5/69.

TABLE 5/69. Lobelia ramosa (Second Generation).

Heights of plants measured in inches.

Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot.

Column 2: Tallest Crossed Plant in each Pot.

Column 3: Tallest Self-fertilised Plant in each Pot.

Pot 1 : 27 4/8 : 18 4/8.

Pot 2 : 21 : 19 4/8.

Pot 3 : 21 4/8 : 19.

Crowded.

Total : 70 : 57.

The average height of the three tallest crossed plants is here 23.33,

and that of the tallest self-fertilised 19 inches; or as 100 to 81.

Besides this difference in height, the crossed plants were much more

vigorous and more branched than the self-fertilised plants, and it is

unfortunate that they were not weighed.

Lobelia fulgens.

This species offers a somewhat perplexing case. In the first generation

the self-fertilised plants, though few in number, greatly exceeded the

crossed in height; whilst in the second generation, when the trial was

made on a much larger scale, the crossed beat the self-fertilised

plants. As this species is generally propagated by off-sets, some

seedlings were first raised, in order to have distinct plants. On one of

these plants several flowers were fertilised with their own pollen; and

as the pollen is mature and shed long before the stigma of the same

flower is ready for fertilisation, it was necessary to number each

flower and keep its pollen in paper with a corresponding number. By this

means well-matured pollen was used for self-fertilisation. Several

flowers on the same plant were crossed with pollen from a distinct

individual, and to obtain this the conjoined anthers of young flowers

were roughly squeezed, and as it is naturally protruded very slowly by

the growth of the pistil, it is probable that the pollen used by me was

hardly mature, certainly less mature than that employed for

self-fertilisation. I did not at the time think of this source of error,

but I now suspect that the growth of the crossed plants was thus

injured. Anyhow the trial was not perfectly fair. Opposed to the belief

that the pollen used in crossing was not in so good a state as that used

for self-fertilisation, is the fact that a greater proportional number

of the crossed than of the self-fertilised flowers produced capsules;

but there was no marked difference in the amount of seed contained in

the capsules of the two lots. (5/24. Gartner has shown that certain

plants of Lobelia fulgens are quite sterile with pollen from the same

plant, though this pollen is efficient on any other individual; but none

of the plants on which I experimented, which were kept in the

greenhouse, were in this peculiar condition.)

As the seeds obtained by the above two methods would not germinate when

left on bare sand, they were sown on the opposite sides of four pots;

but I succeeded in raising only a single pair of seedlings of the same

age in each pot. The self-fertilised seedlings, when only a few inches

in height, were in most of the pots taller than their opponents; and

they flowered so much earlier in all the pots, that the height of the

flower-stems could be fairly compared only in Pots 1 and 2.

TABLE 5/70. Lobelia fulgens (First Generation).

Heights of flower-stems measured in inches.

Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot.

Column 2: Height of Flower-stems on the Crossed Plants.

Column 3: Height of Flower-stems on the Self-fertilised Plants.

Pot 1 : 33 : 50.

Pot 2 : 36 4/8 : 38 4/8.

Pot 3 : 21* : 43.

Pot 4 : 12* : 35 6/8.

*Not in full flower.

The mean height of the flower-stems of the two crossed plants in Pots 1

and 2 is here 34.75 inches, and that of the two self-fertilised plants

in the same pots 44.25 inches; or as 100 to 127. The self-fertilised

plants in Pots 3 and 4 were in every respect very much finer than the

crossed plants.

I was so much surprised at this great superiority of the self-fertilised

over the crossed plants, that I determined to try how they would behave

in one of the pots during a second growth. The two plants, therefore, in

Pot 1 were cut down, and repotted without being disturbed in a much

larger pot. In the following year the self-fertilised plant showed even

a greater superiority than before; for the two tallest flower-stems

produced by the one crossed plant were only 29 4/8 and 30 1/8 inches in

height, whereas the two tallest stems on the one self-fertilised plant

were 49 4/8 and 49 6/8 inches; and this gives a ratio of 100 to 167.

Considering all the evidence, there can be no doubt that these

self-fertilised plants had a great superiority over the crossed plants.

CROSSED AND SELF-FERTILISED PLANTS OF THE SECOND GENERATION.

TABLE 5/71. Lobelia fulgens (Second Generation).

Heights of flower-stems measured in inches.

Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot.

Column 2: Crossed Plants.

Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants.

Pot 1 : 27 3/8 : 32 3/8.

Pot 1 : 26 : 26 3/8.

Pot 1 : 24 3/8 : 25 1/8.

Pot 1 : 24 4/8 : 26 2/8.

Pot 2 : 34 : 36 2/8.

Pot 2 : 26 6/8 : 28 6/8.

Pot 2 : 25 1/8 : 30 1/8.

Pot 2 : 26 : 32 2/8.

Pot 3 : 40 4/8 : 30 4/8.

Pot 3 : 37 5/8 : 28 2/8.

Pot 3 : 32 1/8 : 23.

Pot 4 : 34 5/8 : 29 4/8.

Pot 4 : 32 2/8 : 28 3/8.

Pot 4 : 29 3/8 : 26.

Pot 4 : 27 1/8 : 25 2/8.

Pot 5 : 28 1/8 : 29.

Pot 5 : 27 : 24 6/8.

Pot 5 : 25 3/8 : 23 2/8.

Pot 5 : 24 3/8 : 24.

Pot 6 : 33 5/8 : 44 2/8.

Pot 6 : 32 : 37 6/8.

Pot 6 : 26 1/8 : 37.

Pot 6 : 25 : 35.

Pot 7 : 30 6/8 : 27 2/8.

Pot 7 : 30 3/8 : 19 2/8.

Pot 7 : 29 2/8 : 21.

Pot 8 : 39 3/8 : 23 1/8.

Pot 8 : 37 2/8 : 23 4/8.

Pot 8 : 36 : 25 4/8.

Pot 8 : 36 : 25 1/8.

Pot 9 : 33 3/8 : 19 3/8.

Pot 9 : 25 : 16 3/8.

Pot 9 : 25 3/8 : 19.

Pot 9 : 21 7/8 : 18 6/8.

Total : 1014.00 : 921.63.

I determined on this occasion to avoid the error of using pollen of not

quite equal maturity for crossing and self-fertilisation; so that I

squeezed pollen out of the conjoined anthers of young flowers for both

operations. Several flowers on the crossed plant in Pot 1 in Table 5/70

were again crossed with pollen from a distinct plant. Several other

flowers on the self-fertilised plant in the same pot were again

self-fertilised with pollen from the anthers of other flowers on the

SAME PLANT. Therefore the degree of self-fertilisation was not quite so

close as in the last generation, in which pollen from the SAME FLOWER,

kept in paper, was used. These two lots of seeds were thinly sown on

opposite sides of nine pots; and the young seedlings were thinned, an

equal number of nearly as possible the same age being left on the two

sides. In the spring of the following year (1870), when the seedlings

had grown to a considerable size, they were measured to the tips of

their leaves; and the twenty-three crossed plants averaged 14.04 inches

in height, whilst the twenty-three self-fertilised seedlings were 13.54

inches; or as 100 to 96.

In the summer of the same year several of these plants flowered, the

crossed and self-fertilised plants flowering almost simultaneously, and

all the flower-stems were measured. Those produced by eleven of the

crossed plants averaged 30.71 inches, and those by nine of the

self-fertilised plants 29.43 inches in height; or as 100 to 96.

The plants in these nine pots, after they had flowered, were repotted

without being disturbed in much larger pots; and in the following year,

1871, all flowered freely; but they had grown into such an entangled

mass, that the separate plants on each side could no longer be

distinguished. Accordingly three or four of the tallest flower-stems on

each side of each pot were measured; and the measurements in Table 5/71

are, I think, more trustworthy than the previous ones, from being more

numerous, and from the plants being well established and growing

vigorously.

The average height of the thirty-four tallest flower-stems on the

twenty-three crossed plants is 29.82 inches, and that of the same number

of flower-stems on the same number of self-fertilised plants is 27.10

inches, or as 100 to 91. So that the crossed plants now showed a decided

advantage over their self-fertilised opponents.

22. POLEMONIACEAE.--Nemophila insignis.

Twelve flowers were crossed with pollen from a distinct plant, but

produced only six capsules, containing on an average 18.3 seeds.

Eighteen flowers were fertilised with their own pollen and produced ten

capsules, containing on an average 12.7 seeds, so that the seeds per

capsule were as 100 to 69. (5/25. Several species of Polemoniaceae are

known to be proterandrous, but I did not attend to this point in

Nemophila. Verlot says ‘Des Variétés’ 1865 page 66, that varieties

growing near one another spontaneously intercross.) The crossed seeds

weighed a little less than an equal number of self-fertilised seeds, in

the proportion of 100 to 105; but this was clearly due to some of the

self-fertilised capsules containing very few seeds, and these were much

bulkier than the others, from having been better nourished. A subsequent

comparison of the number of seeds in a few capsules did not show so

great a superiority on the side of the crossed capsules as in the

present case.

The seeds were placed on sand, and after germinating were planted in

pairs on the opposite sides of five pots, which were kept in the

greenhouse. When the seedlings were from 2 to 3 inches in height, most

of the crossed had a slight advantage over the self-fertilised. The

plants were trained up sticks, and thus grew to a considerable height.

In four out of the five pots a crossed plant flowered before any one of

the self-fertilised. The plants were first measured to the tips of their

leaves, before they had flowered and when the crossed were under a foot

in height. The twelve crossed plants averaged 11.1 inches in height,

whilst the twelve self-fertilised were less than half of this height,

namely, 5.45; or as 100 to 49. Before the plants had grown to their full

height, two of the self-fertilised died, and as I feared that this might

happen with others, they were again measured to the tops of their stems,

as shown in Table 5/72.

TABLE 5/72. Nemophila insignis; 0 means that the plant died.

Heights of plants measured in inches.

Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot.

Column 2: Crossed Plants.

Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants.

Pot 1 : 32 4/8 : 21 2/8.

Pot 2 : 34 4/8 : 23 5/8.

Pot 3 : 33 1/8 : 19.

Pot 3 : 22 2/8 : 7 2/8.

Pot 3 : 29 : 17 4/8.

Pot 4 : 35 4/8 : 10 4/8.

Pot 4 : 33 4/8 : 27.

Pot 5 : 35 : 0.

Pot 5 : 38 : 18 3/8.

Pot 5 : 36 : 20 4/8.

Pot 5 : 37 4/8 : 34.

Pot 5 : 32 4/8 : 0.

Total : 399.38 : 199.00.

The twelve crossed plants now averaged 33.28, and the ten

self-fertilised 19.9 inches in height, or as 100 to 60; so that they

differed somewhat less than before.

The plants in Pots 3 and 5 were placed under a net in the greenhouse,

two of the crossed plants in the latter pot being pulled up on account

of the death of two of the self-fertilised; so that altogether six

crossed and six self-fertilised plants were left to fertilise themselves

spontaneously. The pots were rather small, and the plants did not

produce many capsules. The small size of the self-fertilised plants will

largely account for the fewness of the capsules which they produced. The

six crossed plants bore 105, and the six self-fertilised only 30

capsules; or as 100 to 29.

The self-fertilised seeds thus obtained from the crossed and

self-fertilised plants, after germinating on sand, were planted on the

opposite sides of four small pots, and treated as before. But many of

the plants were unhealthy, and their heights were so unequal--some on

both sides being five times as tall as the others--that the averages

deduced from the measurements in Table 5/73 are not in the least

trustworthy. Nevertheless I have felt bound to give them, as they are

opposed to my general conclusions.

The seven self-fertilised plants from the crossed plants here average

15.73, and the seven self-fertilised from the self-fertilised 21 inches

in height; or as 100 to 133. Strictly analogous experiments with Viola

tricolor and Lathyrus odoratus gave a very different result.

TABLE 5/73. Nemophila insignis.

Heights of plants measured in inches.

Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot.

Column 2: Self-fertilised Plants from Crossed Plants.

Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants from Self-fertilised Plants.

Pot 1 : 27 : 27 4/8.

Pot 1 : 14 : 34 2/8.

Pot 2 : 17 6/8 : 23.

Pot 2 : 24 4/8 : 32.

Pot 3 : 16 : 7.

Pot 4 : 5 3/8 : 7 2/8.

Pot 4 : 5 4/8 : 16.

Total : 110.13 : 147.00.

23. BORAGINACEAE.--Borago officinalis.

This plant is frequented by a greater number of bees than any other one

which I have observed. It is strongly proterandrous (H. Muller

‘Befruchtung’ etc. page 267), and the flowers can hardly fail to be

cross-fertilised; but should this not occur, they are capable of

self-fertilisation to a limited extent, as some pollen long remains

within the anthers, and is apt to fall on the mature stigma. In the year

1863 I covered up a plant, and examined thirty-five flowers, of which

only twelve yielded any seeds; whereas of thirty-five flowers on an

exposed plant growing close by, all with the exception of two yielded

seeds. The covered-up plant, however, produced altogether twenty-five

spontaneously self-fertilised seeds; the exposed plant producing

fifty-five seeds, the product, no doubt, of cross-fertilisation.

In the year 1868 eighteen flowers on a protected plant were crossed with

pollen from a distinct plant, but only seven of these produced fruit;

and I suspect that I applied pollen to many of the stigmas before they

were mature. These fruits contained on an average 2 seeds, with a

maximum in one of three seeds. Twenty-four spontaneously self-fertilised

fruits were produced by the same plant, and these contained on an

average 1.2 seeds, with a maximum of two in one fruit. So that the

fruits from the artificially crossed flowers yielded seeds compared with

those from the spontaneously self-fertilised flowers, in the ratio of

100 to 60. But the self-fertilised seeds, as often occurs when few are

produced, were heavier than the crossed seeds in the ratio of 100 to 90.

These two lots of seeds were sown on opposite sides of two large pots;

but I succeeded in raising only four pairs of equal age. When the

seedlings on both sides were about 8 inches in height they were equal.

When in full flower they were measured, as follows:--

TABLE 5/74. Borago officinalis.

Heights of plants measured in inches.

Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot.

Column 2: Crossed Plants.

Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants.

Pot 1 : 19 : 13 4/8.

Pot 1 : 21 : 18 6/8.

Pot 1 : 16 4/8 : 20 2/8.

Pot 2 : 26 2/8 : 32 2/8.

Total : 82.75 : 84.75.

The average height of the four crossed plants is here 20.68, and that of

the four self-fertilised 21.18 inches; or as 100 to 102. The

self-fertilised plants thus exceeded the crossed in height by a little;

but this was entirely due to the tallness of one of the self-fertilised.

The crossed plants in both pots flowered before the self-fertilised.

Therefore I believe if more plants had been raised, the result would

have been different. I regret that I did not attend to the fertility of

the two lots.

24. NOLANACEAE.--Nolana prostrata.

In some of the flowers the stamens are considerably shorter than the

pistil, in others equal to it in length. I suspected, therefore, but

erroneously as it proved, that this plant was dimorphic, like Primula,

Linum, etc., and in the year 1862 twelve plants, covered by a net in the

greenhouse, were subjected to trial. The spontaneously self-fertilised

flowers yielded 64 grains weight of seeds, but the product of fourteen

artificially crossed flowers is here included, which falsely increases

the weight of the self-fertilised seeds. Nine uncovered plants, the

flowers of which were eagerly visited by bees for their pollen and were

no doubt intercrossed by them, produced 79 grains weight of seeds:

therefore twelve plants thus treated would have yielded 105 grains. Thus

the seeds produced by the flowers on an equal number of plants, when

crossed by bees, and spontaneously self-fertilised (the product of

fourteen artificially crossed flowers being, however, included in the

latter) were in weight as 100 to 61.

In the summer of 1867 the trial was repeated; thirty flowers were

crossed with pollen from a distinct plant and produced twenty-seven

capsules, each containing five seeds. Thirty-two flowers were fertilised

with their own pollen, and produced only six capsules, each with five

seeds. So that the crossed and self-fertilised capsules contained the

same number of seeds, though many more capsules were produced by the

cross-fertilised than by the self-fertilised flowers, in the ratio of

100 to 21.

An equal number of seeds of both lots were weighed, and the crossed

seeds were to the self-fertilised in weight as 100 to 82. Therefore a

cross increases the number of capsules produced and the weight of the

seeds, but not the number of seeds in each capsule.

These two lots of seeds, after germinating on sand, were planted on the

opposite sides of three pots. The seedlings when from 6 to 7 inches in

height were equal. The plants were measured when fully grown, but their

heights were so unequal in the several pots, that the result cannot be

fully trusted.

TABLE 5/75. Nolana prostrata.

Heights of plants measured in inches.

Column 1: Number (Name) of Pot.

Column 2: Crossed Plants.

Column 3: Self-fertilised Plants.

Pot 1 : 8 4/8 : 4 2/8.

Pot 1 : 6 4/8 : 7 4/8.

Pot 2 : 10 4/8 : 14 4/8.

Pot 2 : 18 : 18.

Pot 3 : 20 2/8 : 22 6/8.

Total : 63.75 : 67.00.

The five crossed plants average 12.75, and the five self-fertilised 13.4

inches in height; or as 100 to 105.

The Effects of Cross & Self-Fertilisation in the Vegetable Kingdom · 第 5 / 12 章