F. HENLEY

Think, Louisa, what must be the effect of such a letter, coming at such

a moment!--I believe I was in no danger; though, if there be a man on

the face of the earth more dangerous than any other, it is surely

Clifton. But the watchful spirit of Frank seems placed like my guardian

angel, to protect me from all possible harm.

My mind debated for a moment whether it were not wrong to distrust the

power of truth and virtue, and not to let Mr. Clifton see I could

demolish the audacious sophistry by which he had endeavoured to

confound and overwhelm me. But my ideas were deranged, and I could not

collect sufficient fortitude. Oh how dangerous is this confusion of the

judgment, and how desirable that heavenly presence of mind which is

equal to these great these trying occasions! I therefore thought it

more prudent to suffer him to depart, and suspect vilely of me, than to

encounter the rude contest which he would more audaciously recommence,

were I to send away Mrs. Clarke, which he might even misconstrue into a

signal of approbation. These fears prevailed, and I desired her to

stay, and by my manner told him I wished his absence.

Louisa, how shall I describe my anguish of heart at seeing all those

hopes of a mind so extraordinary, for extraordinary it is even in

guilt, at once overthrown? It was indeed iteration of anguish! What!

Can guile so perfectly assume the garb of sincerity? Can hypocrisy

wear so impenetrable a mask? How shall we distinguish? What guide

have we? How be certain that the next seeming virtuous man we meet

is not a--Well, well, Louisa--I will remember--Brother. My Louisa

knows it is not from the person, but from the vice that I turn away

with disgust. Would I willingly give her heart a pang? Let her tell

me if she can suspect it. She has fortitude, she has affection; but

it is an affection for virtue, truth, and justice. She will endeavour

to reform error the most obdurate. So will I, so will all that are

worthy the high office. But she will not wish me either to marry with

or to countenance this error. Marry?--how does my soul shudder at the

thought! His reasoning was just; seduction would have been a petty

injury, or rather a blessing, compared to this master evil! He was

most merciful when he meant me, as he thought, most destruction. I

have been guilty of a great error. The reformation of man or woman

by projects of marriage is a mistaken a pernicious attempt. Instead

of being an act of morality, I am persuaded it is an act of vice. Let

us never cease our endeavours to reform the licentious and the

depraved, but let us not marry them.

The letter had not been delivered more than two hours before Frank

arrived. You may think, Louisa, how hard he had ridden; but he refused

to imagine himself fatigued. He brought another letter, which Abimelech

had received, but which for some hours he obstinately refused to give

up, and for this reason Frank sent off the express. A letter, not of

Clifton's writing, but of his invention and sending!

Finding that Frank was likely to prevail on his father to raise the

money for Sir Arthur, and obviate all further impediments to our

marriage, Clifton, fearful that it should take place, wrote anonymously

to Abimelech, to inform him I was in love with Frank, and to encourage

him to persist. But read the letter yourself; the following is a true

copy of it[1].

[Footnote 1: The reader has already perused it in Letter XCIV, to which

he is referred.].

If such a letter be his, I am sure, Louisa, you will not say I have

thought or spoken too unkindly of him; and that it is his we have

indubitable proof, though it was anonymous and not in his handwriting.

You no doubt remember, Louisa, the short story of the English lad, whom

your brother hired at Paris. It was written by him, though innocently

and without knowing what was intended. This lad has an aunt, who after

having laboured to old age is now lame, infirm, and in need of support.

The active Frank has been with her, has aided her with money and

consoled her with kindness. The lad himself was desirous of assisting

her; and Frank, willing to encourage industry in the young, gave him

some writings to copy at his leisure hours. By this accident he knew

the lad's hand-writing.

I forgot to mention, in its proper place, the astonishment of Frank at

the sudden change in his father, and the firm resolution he took to

discover the cause of this change. The obstinacy of Abimelech was

extreme; but Frank was still more pertinacious, more determined, and so

unwearied and incessant, in his attacks on his father, that the old man

at last could resist no longer, and shewed him this letter.

From what has preceded, that is from his manner of acting, you may well

imagine what the alarms and sensations of Frank were. He brought the

letter up with him, for he would not trust it out of his own custody,

and immediately went himself to Clifton's stables in search of the lad,

brought him to me, and then first shewed him the letter, which that no

possible collusion might be alleged he had left in my keeping, and then

asked if it were not his hand-writing. The lad very frankly and

unhesitatingly answered it was; except the direction, which this

plotting Clifton had procured to be written by some other person.

Without telling the lad more than was necessary, Frank advised him to

quit his service, for that there was something relating to that letter

which would certainly occasion a quarrel, and perhaps worse, between

him and his master: and, as it would be prudent for him to keep out of

the way, he sent him down to Wenbourne-Hill, where the lad is at

present.

And now what shall I say to my Louisa? How shall I sooth the feelings

of my friend? Do they need soothing? Does she consider all mankind as

her relations and brothers, or does she indeed imagine that one whose

principles are so opposite to her own is the only brother she

possesses? Will she grieve more for him than she would for any other,

who should be equally unfortunate in error? Or does she doubt with me

whether grief can in any possible case be a virtue? And if so, is there

any virtue of which she is incapable? What is relation, what is

brother, what is self, if relation, brother, or self be at war with

truth? And does not truth command us to consider beings exactly as they

are, without any respect to this relationship, this self?

But I know my Louisa; she will never be impatient under trial, however

severe; nor foolishly repine for the past, though she will strenuously

labour for the future.

All good, all peace, all happiness, all wisdom be with her!

Anna St. Ives · 第 288 / 387 题