LETTER LXXXII

_Anna Wenbourne St. Ives to Louisa Clifton_

_London, Grosvenor-Street_

A fortnight has almost elapsed since I last wrote to my Louisa, till my

heart begins to cry shame at the delay. Could I plead no other excuse

than the trifling occupations of a trifling world I must sign my own

condemnation; but your brother has afforded me better employment. Our

frequent conversations on many of the best and most dignified of moral

enquiries, his acute remarks and objections, and the difficult problems

he has occasionally given me to solve, have left me in no danger of

being idle.

Oh, Louisa, how exquisite is the pleasure I feel, to see him thus

determined, thus incessant in his pursuit! A change so fortunate and so

sudden astonishes while it delights!--May it continue!--May it

increase!--May?--Vain unworthy wish!--It must--The mind having once

seized on the clue of truth can neither quit its hold nor become

stationary; it is obliged to advance. And when its powers are equal to

those of Coke Clifton, ought we to wonder at its bold and rapid

flights?

Still the conquests he daily makes over his own feelings cannot but

surprise. His struggles are evident, but they are effectual. He even

resolutely casts off the strong prejudices he had conceived against

Frank Henley, invites him to aid us in our researches, and appeals to

him to explain and decide.

'Let us if we wish to weed out error be sincere in our efforts, and

have no remorse for our prejudices.'

This is his own language, Louisa! Oh that I could fully communicate the

pleasure this change of character gives me to my friend. Yes, the

restraint which too frequent contradiction lays him under will soon

wear off, and how great will then be the enthusiasm with which he will

defend and promulgate truth!

Nor is it less delightful to observe the satisfaction which this reform

sometimes gives to Frank Henley. At others indeed he owns he is

disturbed by doubt: but he owns it with feelings of regret, and is

eager to prove himself unjust.

Yet respecting me his thoughts never vary--Alas! Louisa, I still 'am

his by right.' His tongue is silent, but his looks and manner are

sufficiently audible. I surely have been guilty of the error I so much

dreaded; my cause was strong, but my arguments were feeble; I have

prolonged the warfare of the passions which I attempted to eradicate;

or rather have left on his mind a deep sense of injustice committed by

me--! The thought is intolerable!--Excruciating!

But oh with what equanimity, with what fortitude does he endure his

imagined wrongs! Pure most pure must that passion be which at once

possesses the strength of his and his forbearance! There are indeed but

few Frank Henleys!

Surely, Louisa, I may do him justice?--Surely to esteem the virtuous

cannot merit the imputation of guilt?--Who can praise him as he

deserves? And can that which is right in others be wrong in me?--Yet

such are the mistakes to which we are subject, I scarcely can speak or

even think of him without suspecting myself of committing some culpable

impropriety!

Pardon, Louisa, these wanderings of the mind! They are marauders which

uniform vigilance alone can repel. They are ever in arms, and I obliged

to be ever alert. But it is petty warfare, and cannot shake the

dominion of truth.

My feelings have led me from the topic I intended for the chief subject

of this letter.

The course of our enquiries has several times forced us upon that great

question, 'the progress of mind toward perfection, and the different

order of things which must inevitably be the result.' Yesterday this

theme again occurred. Frank was present; and his imagination, warm with

the sublimity of his subject, drew a bold and splendid picture of the

felicity of that state of society when personal property no longer

shall exist, when the whole torrent of mind shall unite in enquiry

after the beautiful and the true, when it shall no longer be diverted

by those insignificant pursuits to which the absurd follies that

originate in our false wants give birth, when individual selfishness

shall be unknown, and when all shall labour for the good of all.

A state so distant from present manners and opinions, and apparently so

impossible, naturally gave rise to objections; and your brother put

many shrewd and pertinent questions, which would have silenced a mind

less informed and less comprehensive than that of our instructor.

At last a difficulty arose which to me wore a very serious form; and as

what was said left a strong impression on my memory, I will relate that

part of the conversation. Observe, Louisa, that Clifton and Frank were

the chief speakers. Your brother began.

I confess, sir, you have removed many apparently unconquerable

difficulties: but I have a further objection which I think

unanswerable.

What is it?

Neither man nor woman in such a state can have any thing peculiar: the

whole must be for the use and benefit of the whole?

As generally as practice will admit: and how very general that may be,

imperfect as its constitution was, Sparta remained during five hundred

years a proof.

Then how will it be possible, when society shall be the general

possessor, for any man to say--_This is my servant?_

He cannot: there will be no servants.

Anna St. Ives · 第 248 / 387 题