E. M. M.

Thornhill Square, August 16. 1851.

_Was Milton an Anglo-Saxon Scholar?_ (Vol. iv., p. 100.).--Is it too

much to suppose that the learned "Secretary for Forreigne Tongues" was

acquainted with the _Paraphrasis poetica Genesios ac præcipuarum sacræ

Paginæ Historiarum, abhinc Annos MLXX. Anglo-Saxonicè conscripta, et

nunc primum edita a Francisco Junius_, published at Amsterdam in 1655,

at least two years before he commenced his immortal poem? Hear Mr.

Turner on the subject:

"Milton could not be wholly unacquainted with Junius; and if he

conversed with him, Junius was very likely to have made Cædmon the

topic of his discourse, and may have read enough in English to

Milton, to have fastened upon his imagination, without his being a

Saxon scholar."--Turner's _Anglo-Saxons_, vol. iii., p. 316.

Both Mr. Turner and Mr. Todd, however, appear to lean to the opinion

that Milton was not unskilled in Saxon literature, and mention, as an

argument in its favour, the frequent quotations from the _Anglo-Saxon

Chronicle_ which occur in the History. It is also worthy of note that

Alexander Gill, his schoolmaster, and whose friendship Milton possessed

in no small degree, had pursued his researches somewhat deep into the

"well of English undefiled," as appears from that extremely curious,

though little known work, the _Logonomia Anglica_.

Notes and Queries, Vol. IV, Number 97, September 6, 1851 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 74 / 92 题