CHAPTER XXI.

INSULATORS FOR TRANSMISSION LINES.

Line insulators, pins, and cross-arms all go to make up paths of more or

less conductivity between the wires of a transmission circuit. The

amount of current flowing along these paths from one conductor to

another in any case will depend on the combined resistance of the

insulators, pins, and cross-arm at each pole.

As a general rule, the wires of high-voltage transmission circuits are

used bare because continuous coverings would add materially to the cost

with only a trifling increase in effective insulation against high

voltages. In some instances the wires of high-pressure transmission

lines have individual coverings for short distances where they enter

cities, but often this is not the case. At Manchester, N. H., bare

conductors from water-power plants enter the sub-station, well within

the city limits, at 12,000 volts. From the water-power at Chambly the

bare 25,000-volt circuits, after crossing the St. Lawrence River over

the great Victoria bridge, pass overhead to a terminal-house near the

water-front in Montreal. In order to reach the General Electric Works,

the 30,000-volt circuits from Spier Falls enter the city limits of

Schenectady, N. Y., with bare overhead conductors.

Where transmission lines pass over a territory exposed to corrosive

gases, it is sometimes desirable to give each wire a weather-proof

covering. An instance of this sort occurs near Niagara Falls where the

aluminum conductors forming one of the circuits to Buffalo are covered

with a braid that is saturated with asphaltum for some distance.

Each path, formed by the surface of the insulators of a line and the

pins and cross-arm by which they are supported, not only wastes the

energy represented by the leakage current passing over it, but may lead

to the charring and burning of the pins and cross-arm by this current.

To prevent such burning, the main reliance is to be placed in the

surface resistance of the insulators rather than that of pins and

cross-arms. These insulators should be made of glass or porcelain, and

should be used dry--that is, without oil. In some of the early

transmission lines, insulators were used on which the lower edges were

turned inward and upward so that a circular trough was formed beneath

the body of the insulator, and this trough was filled with heavy

petroleum. It was found, however, that this trough of oil served to

collect dirt and thus tended to lower the insulation between wire and

cross-arm, so that the practice was soon abandoned. Glass and porcelain

insulators are rivals for use on high-tension lines, and each has

advantages of its own. Porcelain insulators are much stronger

mechanically than are those of glass, and are not liable to crack

because of unequal internal expansion, a result sometimes met with where

glass insulators are exposed to a hot morning sun. In favor of glass

insulators it may be said that their insulating properties are quite

uniform, and that, unlike porcelain, their internal defects are often

apparent on inspection. In order to avoid internal defects in large

porcelain insulators, it has been found necessary to manufacture some

designs in several parts and then cement the parts of each insulator

together.

Defective insulators may be divided into two classes--those that the

line voltage will puncture and break and those that permit an excessive

amount of current to pass over their surfaces to the pins and

cross-arms. Where an insulator is punctured and broken, the pin,

cross-arm, and pole to which it is attached are liable to be burned up.

If the leakage of current over the surface of an insulator is large, not

only may the loss of energy on the line where the insulator is used be

serious, but this energy follows the pins and cross-arm in its path from

wire to wire, and gradually chars the former, or both, so that they are

ultimately set on fire or break through lack of mechanical strength. The

discharge over the surface of an insulator may be so large in amount as

to have a disruptive character, and thus to be readily visible. More

frequently this surface leakage of current over insulators is of the

invisible and silent sort that nevertheless may be sufficient in amount

to char, weaken, and even ultimately set fire to pins and cross-arms.

All insulators, whether made of glass or porcelain, should be tested

electrically to determine their ability to resist puncture, and to hold

back the surface leakage of current, before they are put into practical

use on high-tension lines. Experience has shown that inspection alone

cannot be depended on to detect defective glass insulators. Electrical

testing of insulators serves well to determine the voltage to which they

may be subjected in practical service with little danger of puncture by

the disruptive passage of current through their substance. It is also

possible to determine the voltage that will cause a disruptive discharge

of current over the surface of an insulator, when the outer part of this

surface is either wet or dry. This is as far as electrical tests are

usually carried, but it seems desirable that such tests should also

determine the amount of silent, invisible leakage over the surface of

insulators both when they are wet and when they are dry, at the voltage

which their circuits are intended to carry. Such a test of silent

leakage is important because this sort of leakage chars and weakens

insulator pins, and sets fire to them and cross-arms, besides

representing a waste of energy.

The voltage employed to test insulators should vary in amount according

to the purpose for which any particular test is made. Glass and

porcelain, like many other solid insulators, will withstand a voltage

during a few minutes that will cause a puncture if continued

indefinitely. In this respect these insulators are unlike air, which

allows a disruptive discharge at once when the voltage to which it is

exposed reaches an amount that the air cannot permanently withstand.

Because of this property of glass and porcelain insulators, it is

necessary in making a puncture test to employ a voltage much higher than

that to which they are to be permanently exposed. In good practice it is

thought desirable to test insulators for puncture with at least twice

the voltage of the circuits which they will be required to permanently

support on transmission lines.

For the first transmission line from Niagara Falls to Buffalo, which was

designed to operate at 11,000 volts, the porcelain insulators were

tested for puncture with a voltage of 40,000, or nearly four times that

of the circuits they were to support.

Porcelain insulators for the second line between Niagara Falls and

Buffalo, after the voltage of transmission had been raised to 22,000,

were given a puncture test at 60,000 volts. Of these insulators tested

at 60,000 volts only about three per cent proved to be defective. These

puncture tests were carried out by placing each insulator upside down in

an open pan containing salt water to a depth of two inches, partly

filling the pin hole of the insulator with salt water, and then

connecting one terminal of the testing circuit with a rod of metal in

the pin hole, and the other terminal with the pan. Alternating current

was employed in these tests, as is usually the case (Volume xviii.,

Transactions A. I. E. E., pp. 514 to 520). For the transmission lines

between Spier Falls, Schenectady, Albany, and Troy, where the voltage is

30,000, the insulators were required to withstand a puncturing test with

75,000 volts for a period of five minutes after they had been soaked in

water for twenty-four hours.

There is some difference of opinion as to the proper duration of a

puncturing test, the practice in some cases being to continue the test

for only one minute on each insulator, while in other cases the time

runs up to five minutes or more. As a rule, the higher the testing

voltage compared with that under which the insulators will be regularly

used, the shorter should be the period of test. Instead of being tested

in salt water as above described, an insulator may be screwed onto an

iron pin of a size that fits its threads, and then one side of the

testing circuit put in contact with the pin and the other side connected

with the wire groove of the insulator. Care should be taken where an

iron pin is used either in testing or for regular line work, that the

pin is not screwed hard up against the top of the insulator, as this

tends to crack off the top, especially when the pin and insulator are

raised in temperature. Iron expands at a much higher rate than glass or

porcelain, and it is desirable to cement iron pins into insulators

rather than to screw them in. There seems to be some reason to think

that an insulator will puncture more readily when it is exposed to

severe mechanical stress by the expansion of the iron pin on which it is

mounted.

Tests of insulators are usually made with alternating current, and the

form of the voltage curve is important, especially where the test is

made to determine what voltage will arc over the surface of the

insulator from the line wire to the pin. The square root of the mean

square for two curves of alternating voltage or mean effective voltage,

as read by a voltmeter, may be the same though the maximum voltages of

the two curves differ widely. In tests for the puncture of insulators,

the average alternating voltage applied is more important than the

maximum voltage shown by the highest points of the pressure curve,

because of the influence of the time element with glass and porcelain.

On the other hand, when the test is to determine the voltage at which

current will arc over the insulator surface from the line wire to the

pin, the maximum value of the pressure curve should be taken into

consideration because air has no time element, but permits a disruptive

discharge under a merely instantaneous voltage.

Alternators used in transmission systems usually conform approximately

to a sine curve in the instantaneous values of the pressures they

develop, and it is therefore desirable that tests on line insulators be

made with voltages whose values follow the sine curve. Either a single

transformer or several transformers in series may be employed to step up

to the required voltage, but a single transformer will usually give

better regulation and greater accuracy. An air-gap between needle points

is not a very satisfactory means by which to determine the average

voltage on a testing circuit, because, as already pointed out, the

sparking distance between the needle points depends mainly on the

maximum instantaneous values of the voltage, which may vary with the

load on the generator, and the saturation of its magnets. For accurate

results a step-down voltmeter transformer should be used on the testing

circuit.

An insulator that resists a puncture test may fail badly when subjected

to a test as to the voltage that will arc over its surface from line

wire to pin. This arc-over test should be made with the outer surface of

the insulator both wet and dry. For the purpose of this test the

insulator should be screwed onto an iron pin, or onto a wooden pin that

has been covered with tinfoil. One wire of the testing circuit should

then be secured in the groove of the insulator, and the other wire

should be connected to the iron or tin foil of the pin. The voltage that

will arc over the surface of an insulator from the line wire to the pin

depends on the conditions of that surface and of the air. In light air,

such as is found at great elevations, an arc will jump a greater

distance than in dry air near the sea-level. A fog increases the

distance that a given voltage will jump between a line wire and its

insulator pin, and a heavy rain lengthens the distance still further.

The heavier the downpour of rain the greater is the distance over the

outside surface of an insulator that a given voltage will arc over. The

angle at which the falling water strikes the insulator surface also has

an influence on the voltage required to arc over that surface, a

deviation from a downpour perpendicular to the plane of the lower edge

of the petticoat of the insulator seeming to increase the arcing

distance for a given voltage.

An insulator should be given an arc-over test under conditions that are

approximately the most severe to be met in practice. These conditions

can perhaps be fairly represented by a downpour of water that amounts to

a depth of one inch in five minutes for each square inch of the plane

included by the edge of the largest petticoat of the insulator, when the

direction of the falling water makes an angle of forty-five degrees with

that plane. A precipitation of one inch in depth on a horizontal plane

during five minutes seems to be a little greater than any recorded by

the United States Weather Bureau. Under the severe conditions just

named, the voltage required to arc over the insulator surface from line

wire to pin should be somewhat greater at least than the normal voltage

of the circuit where the insulator is to be used. For the transmission

line between Spier Falls and Schenectady, on which the maximum voltage

is 30,000, the insulators were required to stand a test of 42,000 volts

when wet, without arcing over from line wire to pin. In these wet tests

the water should be sprayed evenly onto the insulator surface like rain,

and the quantity of water that strikes the insulator in a given time

should be measured.

When the outside of an insulator is wet with rain, it is evident that

most of the resistance between the line wire and the insulator pin must

be offered by the inside surface of the petticoat of the insulator. For

this reason an insulator that is to withstand a very high voltage so

that no arc will be formed over its wet outside surface must have a

wide, dry surface under its petticoat. In some tests of line insulators

reported in Volume xxi., Transactions A. I. E. E., p. 314, the results

show that the voltage required to arc over from line wire to pin depends

on the shortest distance between them, rather than on the distance over

the insulator surface. Three insulators, numbered 4, 5, and 7 in the

trial, were in each case tested by a gradual increase of voltage until a

discharge took place between the wire and pin. The pins were coated with

tinfoil, and the testing voltage was applied to the tie wire on each

insulator and to the tinfoil of its pin. Insulators 4, 5, and 7

permitted arcs from wire to pin when exposed to 73,800, 74,700, and

74,700 volts respectively, the surfaces of all being dry and clean. The

shortest distances between wires and pins over insulator surface and

through air were 6-5/8, 6-1/4, and 7-7/8 inches respectively for the

three insulators, so that the arcing voltages amounted to 11,140,

11,952, and 9,479 per inch of these distances. Measured along their

surfaces, the distances between wires and pins on these three insulators

were 8, 11-1/4, and 15-1/2 inches respectively, so that the three arcing

voltages, which were nearly equal, amounted to 9,225, 6,640, and 4,819

per inch of these distances. These figures make it plain that the arcing

voltage for each insulator depends on the shortest distance over its

surface and through the air, from wire to pin. It might be expected that

the voltage in any case would arc equal distances over clean, dry

insulator surface or through the air, and the experiments just named

indicate that this view is approximately correct. The sparking distance

through air between needle points, which is greater than that between

smooth surfaces, is 5.85 inches with 70,000 volts, and 7.1 inches with

80,000 volts according to the report in Volume xix., A. I. E. E., p.

721. Comparing these distances with the shortest distances between wires

and pins in the tests of insulators numbered 4, 5, and 7, which broke

down at 73,800 to 74,700 volts when dry, it seems that a given voltage

will arc somewhat further over clean, dry insulator surface than it will

through air. This view finds support from the fact that only a part of

each of the shortest distances between wire and pin was over insulator

surface, the remainder being through air alone.

The fact that the dry part of the surface of an insulator and the air

between its lower wet edge and the pin or cross-arm offer most of the

resistance between the line wire and the pin and cross-arm is plainly

brought out by the results of the tests above mentioned, in the cases of

insulators numbered 4 and 7. While 73,800 volts were required to arc

from line-wire to pin when the entire insulator was dry and clean, the

arc was formed at only 53,400 volts during a moderate rain-storm, in the

case of No. 4 insulator. With insulator No. 7 the arcing voltage was

74,700 when the entire surface was clean and dry, but the arc from wire

to pin was started at 52,800 volts during a moderate rain. No. 5

insulator seems to present an erratic result, for when dry and clean the

arc jumped from wire to pin at 74,700 volts, and yet during a moderate

rain no arc was formed until a voltage of 70,400 was reached. For each

of the seven insulators on which tests are reported as above, the

voltage required to arc from line wire to pin was nearly or quite as

great during a dry snow-storm as when the insulator surface was clean

and dry. When the insulators were covered with wet snow their surface

insulation broke down at voltages that were within ten per cent above or

below the arcing voltages during a moderate rain in five cases. With two

insulators the arcing voltages, when they were covered with wet snow,

were only about sixty per cent of the voltages necessary to break down

the surface insulation between wire and pin during a moderate rain.

When the outside surface of an insulator is wet, as during a moderate

rain, it seems that the under surface of the insulator, and the distance

through air from the lower wet edge of the insulator to the pin or

cross-arm, make up most of the insulation that prevents arcing over from

the wire to the pin or cross-arm. It further appears that it is useless

to extend the distance across the dry under surface of the insulator

indefinitely without a corresponding increase of the direct distance

through air from the lower wet edge of the insulator to the wood of

cross-arm or pin. Insulator No. 7 in the tests under consideration had a

diameter at the lower edge of its outer petticoat of seven inches, and

was mounted on a standard wooden pin. The diameter of this pin in the

plane of the lower edge of the insulator was probably about 1-1/4

inches, so that the radial distance through air from this edge to the

pin must have been 2-7/8 inches approximately. During a moderate rain

the surface insulation of this insulator broke down and an arc was

formed from wire to pin with 52,800 volts. The sparking distance between

needle points at 50,000 volts is 3.55 inches, according to Volume xix.,

A. I. E. E., p. 721, and must be shorter between smooth surfaces, such

as the wire and pin in question, so that nearly all of the 52,800 volts

in this case must have been required to jump the 2-7/8 inches of air,

leaving very little to overcome the slight resistance of the wet outside

surface of the insulator. On this insulator the surface distance from

wire to pin was 15-1/2 inches, while the shortest breaking distance was

only 7-7/8 inches, so that the distance across the dry under surface of

the insulator must have been 15-1/2 - (7-7/8 - 2-7/8) = 10-1/2 inches

approximately. It is evidently futile to put a path 10-1/2 inches long

across dry insulator surface in parallel with a path only 2-7/8 inches

long in air, as an arc will certainly jump this shorter path long before

one will be formed over the longer. The same line of reasoning applies

to No. 3 insulator in this test, which had a diameter of 6-3/4 inches, a

surface distance from wire to pin of 13 inches, and a minimum distance

of 7-1/4 inches, and whose surface insulation broke down at 48,600 volts

during a moderate rain. The necessity of increasing the distance between

the lower wet edges of insulators and the pins and cross-arm, as well as

the distance across the dry under surfaces of insulators, led to the

adoption of the so-called umbrella type for some high-voltage lines. In

this type of insulator the main or outer petticoat is given a relatively

great diameter, and instead of being bell-shaped is only moderately

concave on its under side. With an insulator of this type mounted on a

large, long pin, the lower edge of the umbrella-like petticoat may be

far removed from the pin and cross-arm. Beneath the large petticoat of

such insulators for high voltages there are usually one or more smaller

petticoats or sleeves that run down the pin, and increase the distance

between it and the lower edge of the largest petticoat.

INSULATORS ON TRANSMISSION LINES.

+----------------------------------+-------+---------+--------+-------+

| | |Material | Inches |Inches |

| |Voltage| of |Diameter|Height |

| Location of Line. | of | Insula- | of | of |

| | Line. | tor. |Insula- |Insula-|

| | | | tor. | tor. |

+----------------------------------+-------+---------+--------+-------+

|Electra to San Francisco | 60,000|Porcelain| 11 | 11-1/4|

|Colgate to Oakland | 60,000|Porcelain| 11 | 11-1/4|

|Cañon Ferry to Butte | 50,000|Glass | 9 | 12 |

|Shawinigan Falls to Montreal | 50,000|Porcelain| 10 | 13-1/2|

|Provo around Utah Lake | 40,000|Glass | 7 | 5-3/4|

|Santa Ana River to Los Angeles | 33,000|Porcelain| 6-3/4 | 4-7/8|

|Spier Falls to Schenectady | 30,000|Porcelain| 8-1/2 | 6-3/4|

|Apple River Falls to St Paul | 25,000|Glass | 7 | 5-3/4|

|Chambly to Montreal | 25,000|Porcelain| 5-1/2 | 6-1/2|

|Niagara Falls to Buffalo | 22,000|Porcelain| 7-1/2 | 7 |

|Portsmouth to Pelham, N. H. | 13,000|Porcelain| 5-1/4 | 3-3/4|

|Garvins Falls to Manchester, N. H.| 12,000|Glass | 5 | 4-3/4|

+----------------------------------+-------+---------+--------+-------+

The inner petticoat or sleeve that runs down over the pin and sometimes

reaches nearly to the cross-arm, of course becomes wet on its outside

surface and at its lower edge during a rain; but between this lower wet

part of the inner petticoat, or sleeve, and the lower wet edge of the

larger outside petticoat, there is a wide, dry strip of insulator

surface. A result is that an arc over the surface of the outside

petticoat can reach the wet edge of the sleeve only by crossing the

strip of dry under surface or jumping through the air.

The same type of insulator is used on the 60,000-volt lines between

Electra and San Francisco and between Colgate and Oakland, each

insulator having an outer petticoat 11 inches in diameter and one inner

petticoat or sleeve 6-1/2 inches in diameter. This inner petticoat runs

down the pin for a distance of 7-1/2 inches below the outer petticoat.

Slightly different pins are used for mounting the insulators on the two

transmission lines just named, so that on the former the distance

through air from the lower edge of the outer petticoat to the cross-arm

is 11 inches, and on the latter the corresponding distance is 11-1/2

inches. On the Electra line the lower edge of the inner petticoat of

each insulator is about 3-1/2 inches, and on the Colgate line about 4

inches above the cross-arm.

INSULATORS ON TRANSMISSION LINES.

+------------------------------+---------+---------+---------+----------+

| | Inches | Inches | Inches | Inches |

| | from | from | from | from |

| | Top of | Outside | Lowest | Edge of |

| Location of Line. |Insulator|Petticoat|Petticoat| Outside |

| | to | to | to | to Edge |

| | Cross- | Cross- | Cross- | of Lowest|

| | arm. | arm. | arm. |Petticoat.|

+------------------------------+---------+---------+---------+----------+

|Electra to San Francisco | 14-1/2 | 11 | 3-1/2 | 7-1/2 |

|Colgate to Oakland | 15 | 11-1/2 | 4 | 7-1/2 |

|Cañon Ferry to Butte | 13-1/2 | 7-3/4 | 1-1/2 | 6-1/4 |

|Shawinigan Falls to Montreal | 16-1/4 | 11-3/4 | 3-1/4 | 8-1/2 |

|Santa Ana River to Los Angeles| 8-5/8 | 3-3/4 | 3-3/4 | 0 |

|Spier Falls to Schenectady | 10-3/4 | 7-3/8 | 4-1/4 | 3-3/8 |

|Niagara Falls to Buffalo | 10 | 5-1/2 | 3 | 2-1/2 |

|Chambly to Montreal | 8-1/2 | 4-1/2 | 2 | 2-1/2 |

+------------------------------+---------+---------+---------+----------+

On each of the lines named in this table the wires are strung on the

tops of their insulators.

The Cañon Ferry line is carried on insulators each of which has three

short petticoats and a long separate sleeve that runs down over the pin

to within 1-1/2 inches of the cross-arm. This sleeve makes contact with

its insulator near the pin hole. The outside petticoat of each

insulator on this line is 7-3/4 inches above the cross-arm and 6-1/4

inches above the lower end of the sleeve. Both the main insulator and

the sleeve, in this case, are of glass.

White porcelain insulators are used to support the 50,000-volt

Shawinigan line, and are of a recent design. Each of these insulators

has three petticoats ranged about a central stem so that their lower

edges are 4-1/2 inches, 9 inches, and 13 inches respectively, below the

top. The highest petticoat is 10 inches, the intermediate 9-3/4 inches,

and the lowest 4-1/4 inches in diameter. The height of this insulator is

13 inches, compared with 11-1/4 inches for those used on the Electra and

Colgate lines and 12 inches for the combined insulator and sleeve used

on the Cañon Ferry line. When mounted on its pin, this insulator on the

Shawinigan line holds its wire 16-1/4 inches above the cross-arm,

compared with a corresponding distance of 14-1/2 inches on the Electra,

15 inches on the Colgate, and 13-1/2 inches on the Cañon Ferry line. The

two upper petticoats on each of these insulators are much less concave

than the lowest one, and the edges of all three stand respectively

11-3/4, 7-1/4, and 3-1/4 inches above the cross-arm. From the edge of

the top to the edge of the bottom petticoat the direct distance is 8-1/2

inches.

Of the three transmission lines above named that operate at 50,000 to

60,000 volts, that between Shawinigan Falls and Montreal leads as to

distances between the line wire and insulator petticoats and the

cross-arm. On the Santa Ana line, where the voltage is 33,000, the

insulator is of a more ordinary type, being of porcelain, 6-3/4 inches

in diameter, 4-7/8 inches high, and having the lower edges of its three

petticoats in the same plane. Each of these insulators holds its wire

8-5/8 inches above the cross-arm, and has all of its petticoats 3-1/2

inches above the cross-arm. Unlike the three insulators just described,

which are mounted on wooden pins, this Santa Ana insulator has a pin

with an iron core, wooden threads, and porcelain base. This base extends

up from the cross-arm a distance of 3-1/8 inches, and the wooden sleeve,

in which the threads for the insulator are cut, runs down over the

central bolt of the pin to the top of the porcelain base, which is

5/8-inch below the petticoats.

The 30,000-volt lines from Spier Falls are carried 10-3/4 inches above

their cross-arms by triple petticoat porcelain insulators. Each of these

insulators is 8-1/2 inches in diameter, 6-3/4 inches high, and is built

up of three parts cemented together. A malleable-iron pin cemented into

each insulator with pure Portland cement carries the outside petticoat

7-1/2 inches and its lowest petticoat 4-1/4 inches above the cross-arm.

When the voltage on the Spier Falls lines was raised from about 13,000

to 30,000, the circuits being carried in part by one-piece porcelain

insulators, a number of these insulators were punctured at the higher

pressures, and some cross-arms and poles were burned as a result. No

failures resulted on those parts of these lines where the three-part

insulators were in use. The second pole line between Niagara Falls and

Buffalo was designed to carry circuits at 22,000 volts, or twice that

for which the first line was built. Porcelain insulators were employed

on both of these lines, but while the 11,000-volt line was carried on

three-petticoat insulators, each with a diameter of 7 inches and a

height of 5-1/2 inches, the 22,000-volt line was mounted on insulators

each 7-1/2 inches in diameter and 7 inches high, with only two

petticoats. The older insulator has its petticoats 2 inches above the

cross-arm, and the lower petticoat of the new insulator is 3 inches

above the arm. These two insulators illustrate the tendency to lengthen

out along the insulator axis as the voltage of the circuits to be

carried increases.

[Illustration: FIG. 93A.--The Old and New Insulators on the Niagara

Falls-Buffalo Line.]

For future work at still higher voltages, the advantage as to both first

cost and insulating qualities seems to lie with insulators that are very

long in an axial direction, and which have their petticoats arranged one

below the other and all of about the same diameter, rather than with

insulators of the umbrella type, like those on the Electra and Colgate

lines.

Electric Transmission of Water Power · 第 21 / 23 章