LETTER IX.

Malines.--Its Collection of Pictures.--Antwerp.--The Cathedral.--A

Flemish Quack.--Flemish Names.--The Picture Gallery at Antwerp.--Mr.

Wapper's Carvings in Wood.--Mr. Van Lankeren's Pictures.--The Boulevards

at Brussels.--Royal Abodes.--Palace of the Prince of Orange.--Prince

Auguste d'Ahremberg's Gallery of Pictures.--English Ridicule of America.

Dear ----,

After a consultation with François, I sent the carriage to get a set of

entirely new wheels, Brussels being a coach-making town, and taking a

_voiture de remise_, we drove down to Antwerp. While the horses rested,

we looked at the pictures in Malines. The "Miraculous Draught of Fishes"

is thought by many to be the chef-d'oeuvre of Rubens, but, after

conceding it a hardy conception and magnificent colouring, I think one

finds too much of the coarse mannerism of the artist, even for such a

subject. The most curious part of the study of the different schools is

to observe how much all have been influenced by external objects, and

how completely conventional, after all, the _beau idéal_ of an artist

necessarily becomes. It would be impossible, for one who knew the

several countries, to mistake the works of Murillo, Rubens, or Raphael,

for the works of artists of different schools, and this without

reference to their peculiar manners, but simply as Flemings, Spaniards,

and Italians. Rubens, however, is, I think, a little apt to out-Dutch

the Dutch. He appears to me to have delighted in the coarse, while

Raphael revelled in the pretty. But Raphael could and often did step out

of himself and rise to the grand; and then he was perfect, because his

grandeur was chastened.

We reached Antwerp some time before dinner. The situation of the town

was singular, the Dutch holding the citadel; the place, which was

peopled by their enemies, as a matter of course, lying quite at their

mercy. The road from Brussels is partly commanded by them, and we saw

their flag rising out of the low mounds--for in Flanders the art of

fortifying consists in burrowing as deep as possible--as we approached

the town. Several Dutch gun-boats were in the river, off the town, and,

in the reaches of the Scheldt below, we got glimpses of divers frigates

and corvettes, riding at anchor. As an offset to the works of their

enemies, the Belgians had made a sort of entrenched camp, by enclosing

the docks with temporary ramparts, the defences of the town aiding them,

in part, in effecting their object.

One of our first visits was to the cathedral. This beautiful edifice had

escaped without material damage from the recent conflicts, though the

garrison of the citadel have thrown a few shots at its tower, most

probably with a view to drive curious eyes out of it, the great height

enabling one to get a complete bird's-eye view of what is going on

within their walls. The celebrated Rubenses were cased in massive timber

to render them bomb-proof, and, of course, were invisible.

Processions of peasants were passing from church to church, the whole

day, to implore succour against the cholera, which, by the way, and

contrary to all rule for a low and moist country, is said to be very

light here. The Flemings have the reputation of being among the most

bigoted Catholics, and the most ignorant population of Europe. This

accounts, in some measure, for the existence of the latter quality

among the first inhabitants of New York, most of whom were from

Flanders, rather than from Holland. I have found many of our names in

Antwerp, but scarcely one in Holland. The language at home, too, is much

nearer the Flemish than the Dutch; though it is to be presumed that

there must have been some colonists from Holland, in a province

belonging to that nation. I listened to-day to a fellow vending quack

medicines and vilely printed legends, to a song which, tune and all, I

am quite sure to have heard in Albany, when a schoolboy. The undeviating

character and habits of the people, too, appear to be very much like

those which existed among ourselves, before the influx of eastern

emigration swallowed up everything even to the _suppan_. I remember to

have heard this same quack singing this same song, in the very same

place in June, 1828, when we first visited Antwerp. The effect was

exceedingly ludicrous, for it seemed to me, that the fellow had been

occupying the same spot, employed in the same pursuits, for the last

five years, although the country had been revolutionized. This is also a

little characteristic, for some of our own Communipaws are said to

believe we are still the property of the United Provinces.

The Flemish language has many words that are French in the spelling, but

which have entirely different meanings, representing totally different

things or ideas. _De_ is one. In French this word, pronounced _der_,

without dwelling on the last letter, is a preposition generally meaning

"of." Before a name, without being incorporated with it, it is an

invariable sign of nobility, being even frequently affixed, like the

German _von_, to the family name, on attaining that rank. In Flemish it

is an article, and is pronounced precisely as a Dutchman is apt to

pronounced _the_, meaning the same. Thus De Witt, means _the_ White, or

White; the Flemings using the article to express things or qualities in

the abstract, like the French. Myn Heer De Witt is just the same as

Monsieur le Blanc, or Monsieur Du Bois, in French; one of which means

Monsieur White, and the other Monsieur Wood. So nearly does this

language resemble the English, that I have repeatedly comprehended whole

sentences, in passing through the streets. Now in New York, we used to

think the Dutch had become corrupted by the English, but I fancy that

the corruption has been just the other way.

We had made the acquaintance of a Flemish artist of extraordinary merit,

at Paris; and this gentleman (Mr. Wappers) kindly called this morning to

take us to see the gallery. The collection is not particularly large,

nor is it rich in cabinet pictures, being chiefly composed of

altar-pieces taken from churches. The works are principally those of

Rubens, Vandyke, and a few of the older masters. The Vandykes, I think,

are the best. On the whole, it struck me there were more curious than

pleasing pictures in this gallery, although they are all valuable as

belonging to a school. The study of the "Descent from the Cross" is

among them, and it gave me more pleasure than anything else. Vandyke

certainly rose in our estimation, after this close comparison with his

great rival: he is altogether more human than Rubens, who is a sort of

Dutch giant in the art; out of the natural proportions, and always a

giant.

Mr. Wappers permitted us to see his own painting-room. He is of the

school of the great Flemish masters, and, I think, quite at the head of

his profession, in many of its leading points. It was curious to trace

in the works of this young artist the effects of having Rubens and

Vandyke constantly before him, corrected by the suggestions of his own

genius. His style is something between the two; broader and bolder than

Vandyke, and less robust than Rubens.

We went the round of the churches, for, if Italy be the land of marbles,

Belgium is, or rather has been, the very paradise of those who carved in

wood. I have seen more delicate and highly-finished works of this sort,

in a small way, in other countries; as in the high reliefs of Santa

Maria della Salute, at Venice; but nowhere else is so much attempted,

or, indeed, so much achieved in this branch of art, as here. Many of the

churches are quite surrounded by oak confessionals that are highly and

allegorically ornamented; though, in general, the pulpits contain the

most elaborate designs, and the greatest efforts of this curious work.

One at Brussels has the Conversion of St. Paul, horse, rider and all,

larger than life. The whole is well wrought, even to the expression. But

the best specimens of carving in wood that I remember, were a few

figures over the door of an hospital that we saw in 1828, though I now

forget whether it was at Gorcum or at Breda. One often sees statuary of

great pretension and a wide-spread reputation, that is wanting in the

nature, simplicity, and repose of these figures.

We went to see a collection of pictures owned by Mr. Van Lankeren. It is

a very fine gallery, but there are few paintings by very great artists.

A Van der Heyden (an old New York name, by the way), surpassed anything

I know, in its atmosphere. Poussin, and our own artist Cole, excel in

this high merit, but this picture of Van der Heyden has a cold, gray

transparency that seems actually to have transferred a Dutch atmosphere

to the canvass.

We returned to Brussels in time to dine. At Malines I stood with

admiration beneath the great tower, which possesses a rare majesty. Had

it been completed according to the original plan, I believe it would

have been the highest church-tower in Europe. In the evening we had a

call from Mr. and Mrs. ----, and made an appointment to visit the palace

of the Prince of Orange in the morning.

I was up betimes next day, and took a walk round the park, and on the

upper boulevards. The injuries done in the fight have been, in some

measure, repaired, but the place was deserted and melancholy. The houses

line one side of the boulevards, the other being open to the fields,

which are highly cultivated and unenclosed. This practice of cutting

off a town like a cheese-paring is very common on the continent of

Europe, and the effect is odd to those who are accustomed to straggling

suburbs, as in America and England.

At ten we went to the palace, according to appointment. The royal abodes

at Brussels are very plain edifices, being nothing more than long

unbroken buildings, with very few external ornaments. This of the Prince

of Orange stands in the park, near that of the King, and is a simple

parallelogram with two gates. The principal apartments are in the same

form, being an entire suite that are entered on one side and left on the

other. There is great good taste and elegance in the disposition of the

rooms. A few are rich, especially the _salle de bal_, which is really

magnificent. The place was kept just as it had been left by its last

occupants, Leopold, with good taste, not to say good feeling,

religiously respecting their rights. A pair of gloves belonging to the

princess were shown us, precisely on the spot where she had left them;

and her shawls and toys were lying carelessly about, as if her return

were momentarily expected. This is true royal courtesy, which takes

thrones without remorse, while it respects the baubles.

This palace had many good pictures, and among others a Raphael. There

was a Paul Potter or two, and a couple of pictures, in the same stile,

as pendants, by a living artist of the name of Verboeckhoven, whose

works sustained the comparison wonderfully well.

We were shown the window at which the robber entered who stole the

jewels of the princess; an event that has given room to the enemies of

the house of Nassau to torture into an accusation of low guilt against

her husband.[18] I have never met a gentleman here, who appeared to

think the accusation worthy of any credit, or who treated it as more

than the gossip of underlings, exaggerated by the agents of the press.

[Footnote 18: This affair of the jewels of the Princess of Orange is one

proof, among many others, of the influence of the vilest portion of

mankind over their fellow-creatures. It suited the convenience and views

of some miscreant who pandered for the press (and the world is full of

them), to throw out a hint that the Prince of Orange had been guilty of

purloining the jewels to pay his gambling debts, and the ignorant, the

credulous, and the wonder-mongers, believed a charge of this nature,

against a frank and generous soldier! It was a charge, that, in the

nature of things, could only be disproved by detecting the robber, and

one that a prince and a gentleman would scarcely stoop to deny. Accident

favoured the truth. The jewels have, oddly enough, been discovered in

New York, and the robber punished. Now, the wretch who first started

this groundless calumny against the Prince of Orange, belongs exactly to

that school whose members impart to America more than half her notions

of the distinguished men of Europe.]

From the palace of the Prince of Orange we went to the house of Prince

Auguste d'Ahremberg, to see his collection. This is one of the best

private galleries in Europe, though not particularly large. It is rich

in the works of Teniers,[19] Woovermans, Both, Cuyp, Potter, Rembrandt,

and the other masters of the country. Among others is a first-rate

Gerard Douw (another New York name).

[Footnote 19: One hears of occasionally discovering good pictures in the

streets, an event that actually once occurred to the writer. Shortly

after the revolution of 1830, in passing through the Carrousel, he

bought a female portrait, that was covered with dirt, but not materially

injured. Finding it beautifully painted, curiosity led him to question

the man who had sold it. This person affirmed that it was a portrait of

the wife of David Teniers painted by himself. He was not believed, of

course, and the thing was forgotten, until two picture-dealers, who

accidentally saw it, at different times, affirmed that it was by

Teniers, though neither knew the original of the likeness. On examining

the catalogues, the writer found that such a picture had existed in

Paris, before the revolution, and that it was now lost. But this picture

was square, while that was oval and much larger. The dealer was

questioned again, on the appearance of the picture, without giving him

any clue to the object, and he explained the matter at once, by saying

that it had once been oval, but the canvass getting an injury, he had

reduced it to its present form. Since then, an engraving has been

discovered that scarce leaves a doubt as to the originality of the

portrait.]

I passed the evening at the house of an English gentleman, where the

master of the last-named gallery was one of the company. A guest, a Sir

----, amused me by the peculiarly _British_ manner in which he conveyed

a few remarks on America. Speaking of a countrywoman of ours, who had

lately been at Brussels, he said that she called standing up to dance,

"taking the floor," and he was curious to know if it were a usual form

of expression with us. I had to tell him, we said a horse "took the

track," in racing, and as this lady came from a racing region, she might

have used it, _con amore_, especially in the gallopade. Capt. ----, of

the navy, once called out to the ladies of a quadrille to "shove off,"

when he thought the music had got the start of them; and it is lucky

that this Sir ---- did not hear him, or he would have set it down at

once as an Americanism. These people are constantly on the hunt for

something peculiar and ridiculous in Americans, and make no allowance

for difference in station, provincialisms, or traits of character.

Heaven knows that we are not so very original as to be thus ruthlessly

robbed of any little individuality we may happen to possess.

A Residence in France With an Excursion Up the Rhine, and a Second Visit to Switzerland · 第 60 / 84 题