DOMINGO LOMELYNE.

(Vol. i., p. 193.)

As it is not to be met with in a regular way, your correspondent may be

ignorant that Domingo Lomelyne was progenitor of the _extinct baronets_

LUMLEY, his descendants having softened or corrupted his name into an

identity with that of the great northern race of the latter name. They,

however, retained different coat-armour in the senior line, bearing in

common with many other English families of Italian, Champaigne, and

generally trans-Norman origin, "a chief." Guido de St. Leodigaro and one

Lucarnalsus are the earliest heroes to whom I find it assigned; but

Stephen, son of the Odo, Earl of _Champaigne_ (whence Fortibus, Earl of

Albemarle), also brought it to England at a very early period; and

thence from the Holderness annex of de Fortibus (in spite of the

allegations in Wott. _Bar._, i. 189.), Worsley perhaps copied it. The

old Lumley or Lomelyne accounts connect it with the city of _Naples_.

Your correspondent will find that Domingo Lomelyne was a _Genoese_, and

of the _bedchamber_ to Henry VIII.; that he maintained at his own cost,

and commanded, a troop of horse at Boulogne in the same reign, and had a

pension of 200_l._ per annum from Queen Elizabeth in 1560. If any of

your corespondents can give me the junior ramifications of this family

diverging from the son and grandson of Domingo, I shall feel much

obliged, provided that James Lumley, living 1725, who married Catherine

Hodilow, can be satisfactorily linked with James, the son of Domingo.

James and Martin were the family names, and the family was settled in

London and Essex.

Notes and Queries, Vol. IV, Number 98, September 13, 1851 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 62 / 96 题