REMARKS UPON SOME RECENT QUERIES.

1. Without wishing to protract the discussion about _eisell_, let me

tell the correspondent who questioned whether wormwood could be an

ingredient in any palatable drink, that _crême d'absinthe_ ordinarily

appears with noyau, &c. in a Parisian restaurateur's list of luxurious

cordials. Whilst that _eisell_ was equivalent to wormwood is confirmed

by its being joined with gall, in a page of Queen Elizabeth's book of

prayers, which caught my eye in one of those presses in the library of

the British Museum, where various literary curiosities are now so

judiciously arranged, and laid open for public inspection.

2. As a decisive affirmation of what _rack_ meant, where the word was

the derivative of the Saxon pecan, your correspondents may accept the

following from our martyr, Frith's, _Revelation of Antichrist_. He

renders the second clause of 2 Peter ii. 17., "And racks carried about

of a tempest;" and he immediately adds, "Racks are like clouds, but they

give no rain."

3. In answer to MR. BREEN'S inquiry where there is any evidence from the

writings of Gregory I., that he could be so shameless as to panegyrise

that female monster Queen Brunéhaut, he may read some of that Pope's

flattering language in his letter addressed to her on behalf of that

Augustine whom he sent to England, as contained in Spelman's _Concilia_.

Epist. xvii. (_Brunichildæ, Reginæ Francorum_) begins as follows:

"Gratias omnipotenti Deo referimus, qui inter cætera pietatis suæ

dona, quæ excellentiæ vestræ largitus est, _ita vos amore

Christianæ religionis implevit, ut quicquid ad animarum lucrum_,

quicquid ad propagationem fidei pertinere cognoscitis, _devota

mente et pio operari studio_ non cessetis.... Et quidem hæc de

Christianitate vestra mirentur alii, quibus adhuc beneficia vestra

minus sunt cognita; nam nobis, quibus experimentis jam nota sunt,

non mirandum est, sed gaudendum."--Spelm. _Concil._ p. 82.

And in Epist. xi.:

"Excellentia ergo vestra, _quæ prona in bonis consuevit esse

operibus_."--Id. p. 77.

4. The etymology of Fontainebleau (Vol. iv., p. 38.). I can only speak

from memory of what was read long ago. But I think that in one of

Montfaucon's works, probably _Les Monumens de la Monarchie Française_,

he ascribed the origin of that name to the discovery of a spring amongst

the sandy rocks of that forest by a hound called _Bleau_, to the great

satisfaction of a thirsty French monarch who was then hunting there, and

was thereby induced to erect a hunting-seat near the spring.

5. To A. B. C. (Vol. iv., p. 57.), your questionist about the marriage

of bishops in the early ages of the Christian church, who has had a

reply in p. 125., I would further say, that as we have no biographies

describing the domestic life of any Christian bishop earlier than

Cyprian, who belonged to the middle of the third century, it is only

incidentally that anything appears of the kind which he inquires after.

It would be enough for the primitive Christians to know that their

scriptures said of _marriage_, that it was _honourable in all;_ though

such as were especially exposed to persecution, from their prominence

as officers of the church, would also remember the apostle's advice as

good for the present distress, 1 Cor. vii. As, however, your

correspondent asks what evidence there is that Gregory Nazienzen's

father had children after he was raised to the episcopate, this fact is

gathered from his own poem, in which he makes his father say to him,

"Thy years are not so many as I have passed in sacred duties." For

though these sacred duties began with his admission into the priesthood,

he was made a bishop so soon afterwards, that his younger son, Cæsarius,

must at any rate be held to have been born after the elder Gregory

became a bishop.

Curiously enough, however, good evidence appears in the papal law

itself, that the marriages of ecclesiastics were not anciently deemed

unlawful. In the _Corpus Juris Canonici_, or _Decretum aureum_, D.

Gratiani, Distinctio lvi. canon 2., which professes to be a rescript of

Pope Damasus (A.D. 366-84), says:

"Theodorus papa filius [fuit] Theodori episcopi de civitate

Hierosolyma, Silverius papa filius Silverii episcopi Romæ--item

Gelasius, natione Afer, ex patre episcopo Valerio natus est. Quam

plures etiam alii inveniuntur: qui de sacerdotibus nati apostolicæ

sedi præfuerunt."

To which Gratian attaches as his own conclusion:

"Hine Augustinus ait, _Vicia parentum_ Filiis non imputentur."

Thereby throwing a slur on the said married bishops. But can. xiii., or

Cænomanensem, of the same Distinctio, says:

"Cum ergo ex sacerdotibus nati in summos pontifices supra legantur

esse promoti, non sunt intelligendi de fornicatione, sed de

legitimis conjugiis."

I will only add that Athanasius mentions a Bishop Eupsychius (Primâ

contra Arianos) who was martyred in the reign of Julian, and that the

historian Sozomen says of him (_Eccl. Hist._, lib. v. ch. 11.), that

when he suffered he had but recently married, [Greek: kai hoion eti

nymphion onta].

Notes and Queries, Vol. IV, Number 98, September 13, 1851 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 60 / 96 题