CHAPTER VI.

GETTING MATERIAL

The Material of Speeches. So far this book has dealt almost entirely

with the manner of speaking. Now it comes to the relatively more

important consideration of the material of speech. Necessary as it is

that a speaker shall know how to speak, it is much more valuable that

he shall know what to speak. We frequently hear it said of a speaker,

"It wasn't what he said, it was the way he said it," indicating

clearly that the striking aspect of the delivery was his manner; but

even when this remark is explained it develops frequently that there

was some value in the material, as well as some charm or surprise or

novelty in the method of expression. In the last and closest analysis

a speech is valuable for what it conveys to its hearers' minds, what

it induces them to do, not what temporary effects of charm and

entertainment it affords.

Persons of keen minds and cultivated understandings have come away

from gatherings addressed by men famous as good speech-makers and

confessed to something like the following: "I was held spellbound all

the time he was talking, but for the life of me, I can't tell you one

thing he said or one idea he impressed upon me." A student should

judge speeches he hears with such things in mind, so that he can hold

certain ones up as models, and discard others as "horrible examples."

It should be the rule that before a man attempts to speak he should

have something to say. This is apparently not always the case. Many a

man tries to say something when he simply has nothing at all to say.

Recall the description of Gratiano's talk, quoted earlier in this

book.

A speaker then must have material. He must get material. The clergyman

knows that he must deliver about a hundred sermons a year. The lawyer

knows he must go into court on certain days. The lecturer must

instruct his various audiences. The business man must address

executive boards, committees, conventions, customers. The student must

address classes, societies. The beginner in speech training must seize

every opportunity to talk. Certainly the natural reserve stock of

ideas and illustrations will soon be exhausted, or it will grow so

stale that it will be delivered ineffectively, or it will be

unsuitable to every occasion. A celebrated Frenchman, called upon

unexpectedly to speak, excused himself by declaring, "What is suitable

to say I do not know, and what I know is not suitable."

Getting Material. There are three ways of getting material. The first

is by observation, the second by interview, the third by reading.

Observation. The value of securing material by observation is apparent

at first glance. That which you have experienced you know. That which

you have seen with your own eyes you can report correctly. That which

has happened to you you can relate with the aspect of absolute truth.

That which you have done you can teach others to do. That which has

touched you you can explain correctly. That which you know to be the

fact is proof against all attack.

These are the apparent advantages of knowledge gained at first hand.

The faculty of accurate observation is one of the most satisfying that

can enter into a person's mental equipment. It can be trained,

broadened, and made more and more accurate. In some trades and

professions it is an indispensable part of one's everyday ability. The

faculty may be easily developed by exercise and test for accuracy.

Everyone acknowledges the weight and significance of material gained

by observation. In America especially we accord attention and regard

to the reports and accounts made by men who have done things, the men

who have experienced the adventures they relate. There is such a

vividness, a reality, a conviction about these personal utterances

that we must listen respectfully and applaud sincerely. Magazines and

newspapers offer hundreds of such articles for avid readers. Hundreds

of books each year are based upon such material.

With all its many advantages the field of observation is limited. Not

every person can experience or see all he is interested in and wants

to talk about. We must choose presidents but we cannot observe the

candidates themselves and their careers. We must have opinions about

the League of Nations, the Mexican situation, the radical labor

movements, the changing taxes, but we cannot observe all phases of

these absorbing topics. If we restrict speeches to only what we can

observe we shall all be uttering merely trivial personalities based

upon no general knowledge and related to none of the really important

things in the universe.

Nor is it always true that the person who does a thing can report it

clearly and accurately. Ask a woman or girl how she hemstitches a

handkerchief, or a boy how he swims or throws a curve, and note the

involved and inaccurate accounts. If you doubt this, explain one of

these to the class. It is not easy to describe exactly what one has

seen, mainly because people do not see accurately. People usually see

what they want to see, what they are predisposed to see. Witnesses in

court, testifying upon oath concerning an accident, usually produce as

many different versions as there are pairs of eyes. Books upon

psychology report many enlightening and amusing cases of this defect

of accurate observation in people.[1]

The two negative aspects of material secured in this first manner--1,

limited range of observation, 2, inaccuracy of observation--placed

beside the advantages already listed will clearly indicate in what

subjects and circumstances this method should be relied upon for

securing material for speeches.

[Footnote 1: Good cases are related by Swift, E.J.: _Psychology and

the Day's Work_.]

EXERCISES

1. Make a list of recent articles based upon observation which you

have seen or read in newspapers and magazines.

2. With what kind of material does each deal?

3. Which article is best? Why?

4. List four topics upon which your observation has given you

material which could be used in a speech.

5. What kind of speech? A speech for what purpose?

6. Consider and weigh the value of your material.

7. Why is it good?

8. What limits, or drawbacks has it?

9. What could be said against it from the other side?

Interview. If a person cannot himself experience or observe all he

wants to use for material his first impulse will be to interview

people who have had experience themselves. In this circumstance the

speaker becomes the reporter of details of knowledge furnished by

others. The value of this is apparent at once. Next to first-hand

knowledge, second-hand knowledge will serve admirably.

Every newspaper and magazine in the world uses this method because its

readers' first query, mental or expressed, of all its informative

articles is "Is this true?" If the author is merely repeating the

experience of an acknowledged expert in the field under discussion,

the value of the interview cannot be questioned. In this case the

resulting report is almost as good as the original testimony or

statement of the man who knows.

The first requisite, therefore, of material gathered in such a manner

is that it be reproduced exactly as first delivered. The man who told

a woman that a critic had pronounced her singing "heavenly" had good

intentions but he was not entirely accurate in changing to that

nattering term the critic's actual adjective "unearthly." The

frequency with which alleged statements published in the daily press

are contradicted by the supposed utterers indicates how usual such

misrepresentation is, though it may be honestly unintentional. The

speaker before an audience must be scrupulously correct in quoting.

This accuracy is not assured unless a stenographic transcript be taken

at the time the information is given, or unless the person quoted

reads the sentiments and statements credited to him and expresses his

approval.

Signed statements, personal letters, printed records, photographs,

certified copies, and other exhibits of all kinds are employed to

substantiate material secured from interviews and offered in speeches.

If you notice newspaper accounts of lectures, political speeches,

legislative procedure, legal practice, you will soon become familiar

with such usages as are described by the expressions, filing as part

of the record, taking of a deposition in one city for use in a lawsuit

in another, Exhibit A, photograph of an account book, statement made

in the presence of a third party, as recorded by a dictaphone, etc.

The first danger in securing material by the personal interview is the

natural error of misunderstanding. The second danger is the natural

desire--not necessarily false, at that--to interpret to the user's

benefit, the material so secured, or to the discredit of all views

other than his own. It is so easy, so tempting, in making out a strong

case for one's own opinions to omit the slight concession which may

grant ever so little shade of right to other beliefs. Judicious

manipulation of any material may degenerate into mere juggling for

support. Quotations and reports, like statistics, can be made to prove

anything, and the general intellectual distrust of mere numbers is

cleverly summed up in the remark, "Figures can't lie, but liars can

figure."

To have the material accepted as of any weight or value the person

from whom it is secured must be recognized as an authority. He must be

of such eminence in the field for which his statements are quoted as

not only to be accepted by the speaker using his material but as

unqualifiedly recognized by all the opponents of the speaker. His

remarks must have the definiteness of the expert witness whose

testimony in court carries so much weight. To secure due

consideration, the speaker must make perfectly clear to his audience

the position of his authority, his fitness to be quoted, his

unquestioned knowledge, sincerity, and honesty.

Knowledge secured in this manner may be used with signal effect in a

speech, either to supply all the material or to cover certain

portions. If you listen to many speeches (and you should), notice how

often a speaker introduces the result of his interviews--formal or

merely conversational--with persons whose statement he is certain will

impress his audience.

EXERCISES

1. Make a list of five topics of which you know so little that you

would have to secure information by interviews.

2. Of these choose two, define your opinion or feeling in each, and

tell to whom you could apply for material.

3. Choose one dealing with some topic of current interest in your

locality; define your own opinion or feeling, and tell to whom you

could apply for material.

4. Explain exactly why you name this person.

5. Prepare a set of questions to bring out material to support your

position.

6. Prepare some questions to draw out material to dispose of other

views.

7. Interview some person upon one of the foregoing topics or a

different one, and in a speech present this material before the class.

8. In general discussion comment on the authorities reported and the

material presented.

Reading. The best way and the method most employed for gathering

material is reading. Every user of material in speeches must depend

upon his reading for the greatest amount of his knowledge. The old

expression "reading law" shows how most legal students secured the

information upon which their later practice was based. Nearly all real

study of any kind depends upon wide and careful reading.

Reading, in the sense here used, differs widely from the entertaining

perusal of current magazines, or the superficial skimming through

short stories or novels. Reading for material is done with a more

serious purpose than merely killing time, and is regulated according

to certain methods which have been shown to produce the best results

for the effort and time expended.

The speaker reads for the single purpose of securing material to serve

his need in delivered remarks. He has a definite aim. He must know how

to serve that end. Not everyone who can follow words upon a printed

page can read in this sense. He must be able to read, understand,

select, and retain. The direction is heard in some churches to "read,

mark, learn, and inwardly digest." This is a picturesque phrasing of

the same principles.

You must know how to read. Have you often in your way through a book

suddenly realized at the bottom of a page that you haven't the

slightest recollection of what your eye has been over? You may have

felt this same way after finishing a chapter. People often read poetry

in this manner. This is not really reading. The speaker who reads for

material must concentrate. If he reaches the bottom of a page without

an idea, he must go back to get it. It is better not to read too

rapidly the first time, in order to save this repetition. The ability

to read is trained in exactly the same way as any other ability.

Accuracy first, speed later. Perhaps the most prevalent fault of

students of all kinds is lack of concentration.

Understanding. After reading comes understanding. To illustrate this,

poetry again might be cited, for any one can _read_ poetry, though

many declare they cannot understand it. The simplest looking prose may

be obscure to the mind which is slow in comprehending. When we read we

get general ideas, cursory impressions; we catch the drift of the

author's meaning. Reading for material must be more thorough than

that. It must not merely believe it understands; it must preclude the

slightest possibility of misunderstanding.

A reader who finds in a printed speech approval of a system of

_representation_ but a condemnation of a system of _representatives_

must grasp at once, or must work out for himself, the difference

between these two: the first meaning a relationship only, the second

meaning men serving as delegates. When he meets an unusual word like

_mandatory_, he must not be content to guess at its significance by

linking it with _command_ and _mandate_, for as used in international

affairs it means something quite definite. To secure this complete

understanding of all his reading he will consult consistently every

book of reference. He should read with a good dictionary at his elbow,

and an atlas and an encyclopedia within easy reach. If he is able to

talk over with others what he reads, explaining to them what is not

clear, he will have an excellent method of testing his own

understanding. The old-fashioned practice of "saying lessons over" at

home contributed to this growth of a pupil's understanding.

Selecting. Third, the reader for material must know how to select. As

he usually reads to secure information or arguments for a certain

definite purpose, he will save time by knowing quickly what not to

read. All that engages his attention without directly contributing to

his aim is wasting time and energy. He must learn how to use books. If

he cannot handle alphabetized collections quickly he is wasting time.

If he does not know how material is arranged he will waste both time

and energy. He must know books.

Every printed production worthy of being called a book should have an

index. Is the index the same as the table of contents? The table of

contents is printed at the beginning of the volume. It is a synopsis,

by chapter headings or more detailed topics, of the plan of the book.

It gives a general outline of the contents of the book. You are

interested in public speaking. You wonder whether a book contains a

chapter on debating. Does this one? You notice that a speaker used a

series of jerky gesticulations. You wonder whether this book contains

a chapter upon gestures. Does it?

The table of contents is valuable for the purposes just indicated. It

appears always at the beginning of a work. If the work fills more than

one volume, the table of contents is sometimes given for all of them

in the first; sometimes it is divided among the volumes; sometimes

both arrangements are combined.

The table of contents is never so valuable as the index. This always

comes at the end of the book. If the work is in more than one volume

the index comes at the _end of the last volume_. What did you learn of

the topic _gestures_ in this book from your reference to the table of

contents? Now look at the index. What does the index do for a topic?

If a topic is treated in various parts of a long work the volumes are

indicated by Roman numerals, the pages by ordinary numerals.

Interpret this entry taken from the index of _A History of the United

States_ by H.W. Elson.

Slavery, introduced into Virginia, i, 93; in South Carolina,

122; in Georgia, 133; in New England, 276; in the South, 276;

during colonial period, iii, 69, 70; in Missouri, 72;

attacked by the Abolitionists, 142-6; excluded from

California, 184; character of, in the South, 208 _seq_.;

population, iv, 82; abolished in District of Columbia, in new

territories, 208; abolished by Thirteenth Amendment, 320,

321.

Retaining Knowledge. The only valid test of the reader's real

equipment is what he retains and can use. How much of what you read do

you remember? The answer depends upon education, training in this

particular exercise, and lapse of time. What method of remembering do

you find most effective in your own case? To answer this you should

give some attention to your own mind. What kind of mind have you? Do

you retain most accurately what you see? Can you reproduce either

exactly or in correct substance what you read to yourself without any

supporting aids to stimulate your memory? If you have this kind of

mind develop it along that line. Do not weaken its power by letting it

lean on any supports at all. If you find you can do without them, do

not get into the habit of taking notes. If you can remember to do

everything you should do during a trip downtown don't make a list of

the items before you go. If you can retain from a single reading the

material you are gathering, don't make notes. Impress things upon your

memory faculty. Develop that ability in yourself.

Have you a different kind of mind, the kind which remember best what

it tells, what it explains, what it does? Do you fix things in your

brain by performing them? Does information become rooted in your

memory because you have imparted it to others? If so you should secure

the material you gather from your reading by adapting some method

related to the foregoing. You may talk it over with some one else, you

may tell it aloud to yourself, you may imagine you are before an

audience and practise impressing them with what you want to retain.

Any device which successfully fixes knowledge in your memory is

legitimate. You should know enough about your own mental processes to

find for yourself the best and quickest way. It is often said of

teachers that they do not actually feel that they _know_ a subject

until they have tried to teach it to others.

Taking Notes. Another kind of mind recalls or remembers material it

has read when some note or hint suggests all of it. This kind of mind

depends upon the inestimably valuable art of note-taking, a method

quite as worthy as the two just considered if its results justify its

employment. Note-taking does not mean a helter-skelter series of

exclamatory jottings. It means a well-planned, regularly organized

series of entries so arranged that reference to any portion recalls

vividly and exactly the full material of the original. Books and

speeches are well planned. They follow a certain order. Notes based

upon them should reproduce that plan and show the relative value of

parts.

When completed, such notes, arranged in outline form, should enable

the maker to reproduce the extended material from which they were

made. If he cannot do that, his reading and his note-taking were to

little purpose. A speaker who has carefully written out his full

speech and delivers it form the manuscript can use that speech over

and over again. But that does not indicate that he really _knows_ much

about the topic he is discussing. He did know about it once. But the

man who from a series of notes can reconstruct material worked up long

before proves that he has retained his knowledge of it. Besides, this

method gives him the chance to adapt his presentation to the changing

conditions and the new audience.

In using this method, when a particularly important bit of information

is met, it should be set down very carefully, usually verbatim, as it

may be quoted exactly in the speech. This copy may be made upon the

paper where the regular notes are being entered so that it may be

found later embodied in the material it supports. Or it may later be

cut from this sheet to be shifted about and finally fixed when

planning the speech, or preparing the outline (discussed in the next

two chapters). Many practised speech-makers copy such material upon

the regularly sized library catalog cards (3 by 5 inches), some

distinguishing by the colors of cards the various kinds of material,

such as arguments supporting a position, opposite arguments,

refutation, statistics, court judgments, etc. The beginner will find

for himself what methods he can use best. Of course he must never let

his discriminating system become so elaborate that he consumes

unjustifiable time and thought in following its intricate plan.

In all cases of quotations--either verbatim or in resume--the

authority must be noted. Author, official title or position, title of

work, circumstances, date, volume, page, etc., should be clearly set

down. In law cases the date is especially important as so frequently

the latest decision reverses all the earlier ones. For convenience of

filing and handling these items are placed at the top of the card.

Monroe Doctrine--Meaning

W. Wilson--Hist. Amer. People, V, 245

The U.S. had not undertaken to maintain an actual formal

protectorate over the S. Amer. states, but it did frankly

undertake to act as their nearest friend in the settlement of

controversies with European nations, and no President,

whether Rep. or Dem., had hesitated since this critical

dispute concerning the boundaries of Brit. Guiana arose to

urge its settlement upon terms favorable to Venezuela.

The following notes were made by a student in preparation for a speech

upon the opposition to the Covenant of the League of Nations. These

excerpts are from the notes upon the newspaper reports of the debate

in Boston in 1919 between Senator Lodge and President Lowell of

Harvard. Notice how accurately they suggest the material of the

original. The numbers represent the paragraph numbers.

[Sidenote: Monroe Doctrine.]

35. Monroe Doctrine a fence that cannot be extended by taking

it down.

36. Monroe Doctrine a corollary of Washington's foreign

policy.

37. Geographical considerations on which Monroe Doctrine

rested still obtain.

38. Systems of morality and philosophy are not transient,

because they rest on verities.

39. Monroe Doctrine rests on law of self-preservation.

40. Offers a larger reservation of Monroe Doctrine as third

constructive criticism.

SENATOR LODGE

[Sidenote: What a League should provide.]

3. Wants to consider what such a league must contain.

4. Must have provision for obligatory arbitration.

5. Obligation not to resort to war must be compulsory.

6. Compulsion must be such that no nation will venture to

incur it.

7. Nation that does not submit to arbitration must be treated

as outlaw.

8. If decisions of arbitrations are clear and generally

considered just, a nation desiring to wage war should be

prevented.

9. Points of contact are not points of friction except when

made too infrequent.

10. Travel, intercourse, frequent meetings help amicable

adjustments.

11. League should provide councils where men can meet and

talk over differences.

12. Penalty for violating agreements should be automatic.

13. All should be obliged to make war on attacking nation.

PRESIDENT LOWELL.

Using the Library. A reader must know how to use libraries. This means

he must be able to find books by means of the card catalogs. These are

arranged by both authors and subjects. If he knows the author of a

book or its title he can easily find the cards and have the book

handed to him. Very often he will seek information upon topics

entirely new to him. In this case he must look under the entry of the

topic for all the books bearing upon his. From the titles, the brief

descriptions, and (sometimes) the tables of contents upon the cards he

can select intelligently the books he needs. For instance, if he is

searching for arguments to support a new kind of city government he

could discard at once several books cataloged as follows, while he

could pick unerringly the four which might furnish him the material he

wants. These books are listed under the general topic "Cities."

_The Spirit of Youth and the City Streets. Old English Towns.

Municipal Administration. The Modern City and its Problems.

Personality of American Cities. Historic Towns of the

Southern States. Romantic Germany. Cities of Italy. American

Municipal Progress_.

Cross references are also valuable. In addition to books cataloged

under the topic consulted, others grouped under other subjects may

contain related information. Here are three actual cross references

taken from a library catalog.

Land: Ownership, rights, and rent. See also conservation,

production, agriculture.

Laboring classes: Morals and habits. See also ethics,

amusements, Sunday.

Church. See also church and state, persecutions.

The continual use of a library will familiarize a student with certain

classes of books to which he may turn for information. If he is

permitted to handle the books themselves upon the shelves he will soon

become skilful in using books. Many a trained speaker can run his eye

over titles, along tables of contents, scan the pages, and unerringly

pick the heart out of a volume. Nearly all libraries now are arranged

according to one general plan, so a visitor who knows this scheme can

easily find the class of books he wants in almost any library he uses.

This arrangement is based upon the following decimal numbering and

grouping of subject matter.

LIBRARY CLASSIFICATION

000 to 090, _General works_. Bibliography. Library economy.

Cyclopedias. Collections. Periodicals. Societies, museums. Journalism,

newspapers. Special libraries, polygraphy. Book rarities.

100 to 190, _Philosophy_. Metaphysics. Special topics. Mind and body.

Philosophic systems. Mental faculties, psychology. Logic, dialectics.

Ethics. Ancient philosophers. Modern.

200 to 290, _Religion_. Natural Theology. Bible. Doctrinal dogmatics,

theology. Devotional, practical. Homiletic, pastoral, parochial.

Church, institutions, work. Religious history. Christian churches and

sects. Ethnic, non-christian.

300 to 390, _Sociology_. Statistics. Political science. Political

economy. Law. Administration. Associations, institutions. Education.

Commerce, communication. Customs, costumes, folklore.

400 to 490, _Philology_. Comparative. English. German. French.

Italian. Spanish. Latin. Greek. Minor literatures.

500 to 590, _Natural science_. Mathematics, Astronomy. Physics.

Chemistry. Geology. Paleontology. Biology. Botany. Zoölogy.

600 to 690, _Useful arts_. Medicine. Engineering. Agriculture.

Domestic economy. Communication, commerce. Chemic technology.

Manufactures. Mechanic trades. Building.

700 to 790, _Fine arts_. Landscape gardening. Architecture. Sculpture.

Drawing, decoration, design. Painting. Engraving. Photography. Music.

Amusements.

800 to 890, _Literature_ (same order as under _Philology_, 400).

900 to 990, _History_. Geography and travels. Biography. Ancient

history. Modern Europe. Asia. Africa. North America. South America.

Oceanica and polar regions.

M. DEWEY: _Decimal Classification_

Using Periodicals. In the section on taking notes the direction was

given that in citing legal decisions the latest should be secured.

Why? That same principle applies to citing any kind of information in

a speech. Science, history, politics, government, international

questions, change so rapidly in these times that the fact of yesterday

is the fiction of today, and _vice versa._ A speaker must be up to

date in his knowledge. This he can be only by consulting current

periodicals. He cannot read them all so he must use the aids provided

for him. The best of these is the _Reader's Guide to Periodical

Literature_ issued every month and kept in the reference room of all

libraries. In it, arranged under both subject and author's name, are

listed the articles which have appeared in the various magazines. The

December issue contains the entries for the entire year. A group of

topics from a recent monthly issue will show its value to the speaker

securing material.

Eastern Question. British case in the East. H. Sidebotham,

Asia 19:261-1263 Mr '19.--England and her eastern policy. H.

Sidebotham. Asia, 19:158-161. F '19.--Khanates of the Middle

East. Ikbal Ali Shah. Contemp. 115:183-187 F '19.--More

secret treaties in the Near East. L. Stoddard. Maps. World's

Work. 37: 589-591. Mr '19.--Part of the United States in the

Near East. R of Rs 59:305-306 Mr '19.--Should America act as

trustee of the Near East? Asia, 19:141-144 F'19.

By this time the student speaker will have that mental alertness

referred to early in this book. He will be reading regularly some

magazine--not to pass the time pleasantly--but to keep himself posted

on current topics and questions of general interest, in which the

articles will direct him to other periodicals for fuller treatment of

the material he is gathering. The nature of some of these is suggested

here.

_The Outlook_, "An illustrated weekly journal of current

events."

_Current Opinion_, Monthly. Review of the World, Persons in

the Foreground, Music and Drama, Science and Discovery,

Religion and Social Ethics, Literature and Art, The

Industrial World, Reconstruction.

_The Literary Digest_, Weekly. Topics of the Day, Foreign

Comment, Science and Invention, Letters and Art, Religion and

Social Service, Current Poetry, Miscellaneous, Investments

and Finance.

_The Independent_, an illustrated weekly.

EXERCISES

1. Describe to the class the contents of a recent issue of a magazine.

Concentrate upon important departments, articles, or policies, so that

you will not deliver a mere list.

2. Tell how an article in some periodical led you to read more widely

to secure fuller information.

3. Explain why you read a certain periodical regularly.

4. Speak upon one of the following topics:

Freak magazines.

My magazine.

Policies of magazines.

Great things magazines have done.

Technical magazines.

Adventures at a magazine counter.

Propaganda periodicals.

5. Explain exactly how you study.

6. How would you secure an interview with some person of prominence?

7. Is the "cramming" process of studying a good one?

8. Is it ever justifiable?

9. Explain how, why, and when it may be used by men in their

profession.

10. Give the class an idea of the material of some book you have read

recently.

11. Explain how reading a published review or hearing comments on a

book induced you to read a volume which proved of value to you.

12. Can you justify the reading of the last part only of a book?

Consider non-fiction.

13. For preserving clippings, notes, etc., which method is

better--cards filed in boxes or drawers, scrap-books, or slips and

clippings grouped in envelopes?

14. Report to the class some information upon one of the following.

Tell exactly how and where you secured your information.

Opium traffic in China.

Morphine habit in the United States.

Women in literature.

A drafted army as compared with a volunteer army.

Orpheum as a theater name.

Prominent business women.

War time influence of D'Annunzio.

Increasing cost of living.

Secretarial courses.

The most beautiful city of the American continent.

Alfalfa.

Women surgeons.

The blimp.

Democracy in Great Britain compared with that of the United States.

The root of the Mexican problem.

San Marino.

Illiteracy in the United States.

How women vote.

(NOTE.--The teacher should supply additions, substitutes, and

modifications.)

Public Speaking · 第 6 / 10 章