After a reign of fifty years, Cecrops was succeeded by

B.C.

Cranaus 1506

Amphictyon 1497

Ericthonius 1487

Pandion 1437

Erictheus 1397

Cecrops II. 1347

Pandion II. 1307

Ægeus 1283

Theseus 1235

Menestheus 1205

Demophoon 1282

Oxyntes 1149

Aphidas 1137

Thymoetes 1336

Melanthus 1128

Codrus 1091

The history of the first twelve monarchs is, for the most part,

fabulous.

Athens was founded by Cecrops, who led a colony out of Egypt, and built

twelve towns, of which he composed a kingdom.

Amphictyon, the third king of Athens, procured a confederacy between

twelve nations, who met every year at Thermopylæ, there to consult over

their affairs in general, as also upon those of each nation in

particular. This convention was called the assembly of the Amphictyons.

The reign of Ægeus is remarkable for the Argonautic expedition, the war

of Minos, and the story of Theseus and Ariadne.

Ægeus was succeeded by his son, Theseus, whose exploits belong more to

fable than to history.

The last king was Codrus, who devoted himself to die for his people.

After Codrus, the title of king was extinguished among the Athenians:

his son was set at the head of the commonwealth, with the title of

Archon, which after a time was declared to be an annual office.

After this Draco was allowed to legislate, and then Solon. The laws of

the former were so severe, that they were said to be written in blood.

Those of the latter were of a different character. Pisistratus acquired

ascendancy; became a despot, and was assassinated: whereon the Athenians

recovered their liberties, and Hippias, the son of Pisistratus, in vain

attempted to re-establish a tyranny. The Athenians, sometime after,

burnt Sardis, a city of the Persians, in conjunction with the Ionians;

and, to revenge this, Darius invaded Greece, but was conquered at

Marathon by Miltiades.

Xerxes soon after invaded Attica, and the Athenians having taken to

their "wooden walls," their city was burnt to the ground.

After the victory, gained over the Persians at Salamis, the Athenians

returned to their city, but were obliged to abandon it again; Mardonius

having wasted and destroyed every thing in its neighbourhood. They

returned to it soon after their victory at Platæa. Their first care,

after returning to their city, was to rebuild their walls. This measure

was opposed by the Lacedemonians, under the pretence of its being

contrary to the interest of Greece, that there should be strong places

beyond the isthmus. Their real motive, however, was suspected to be an

aversion to the rising greatness of the Athenians. Themistocles

conducted himself with great art in this matter[48]. He got himself

appointed ambassador to Sparta; and before setting out he caused all the

citizens, of every age and sex, to apply themselves to the task of

building the walls, making use of any materials within their reach.

Fragments of houses, temples, and other buildings, were accordingly

employed, producing a grotesque appearance, which remained to the days

of Plutarch. He then set out for Sparta; but, on various pretences,

declined entering on his commission, till he had received intelligence

that the work he had set on foot was nearly completed. He then went

boldly to the Lacedemonian senate, declared what had been done, and

justified it, not only by natural right of the Athenians to provide for

their own defence, but by the advantage of opposing such an obstacle to

the progress of the barbarians. The Lacedemonians, sensible of the

justice of this argument, and seeing that remonstrance would now avail

nothing, were fain to acquiesce.

No city in the world can boast, in such a short space of time, of such a

number of illustrious citizens, equally celebrated for their humanity,

learning, and military abilities. Some years after the Persian defeat,

Athens was visited by a very terrible calamity, insomuch that its

ravages were like what had never been before known. This was a plague.

We now adopt the language of Rollin. "It is related, that this scourge

began in Ethiopia, whence it descended into Egypt, from thence spread

over Libya, and a great part of Persia; and at last broke at once like a

flood upon Athens. Thucydides, who himself was seized with that deadly

disease, has described very minutely the several circumstances and

symptoms of it; in order, says he, that a faithful and exact relation of

this calamity may serve as an instruction to posterity, in case the like

should ever happen. This pestilence baffled the utmost efforts of art;

the most robust constitutions were unable to withstand its attacks; and

the greatest care and skill of the physicians were a feeble help to

those who were infected. The instant a person was seized, he was struck

with despair, which quite disabled him from attempting a cure. The

assistance that was given them was ineffectual, and proved mortal to all

such of their relations as had the courage to approach them. The

prodigious quantity of baggage, which had been removed out of the

country into the city, proved very noxious. Most of the inhabitants, for

want of lodging, lived in little cottages, in which they could scarcely

breathe, during the raging heat of the summer; so that they were seen

either piled one upon the other, the dead as well as those who were

dying, or else crawling through the streets; or lying along by the side

of fountains, to which they had dragged themselves, to quench the raging

thirst which consumed them. The very temples were filled with dead

bodies, and every part of the city exhibited a dreadful image of death;

without the least remedy for the present, or the least hopes with regard

to futurity.

"The plague, before it spread into Attica, had, as we have before

stated, made wild havoc in Persia. Artaxerxes, who had been informed of

the mighty reputation of Hippocrates of Cos, the greatest physician of

that or any other age, caused his governors to write to him, to invite

him into his dominions, in order that he might prescribe for those who

were infected. The king made him the most advantageous offers; setting

no bounds to his rewards on the side of interest, and, with regard to

honours, promising to make him equal with the most considerable persons

in his court. This great physician sent no other answer but this:--that

he was free from either wants or desires; and he owed all his cares to

his fellow-citizens and countrymen; and was under no obligation to the

declared enemies of Greece.--Kings are not used to denials. Artaxerxes,

therefore, in the highest transports of rage, sent to the city of Cos,

the native place of Hippocrates, and where he was at that time;

commanding them to deliver up to him that insolent wretch, in order that

he might be brought to condign punishment; and threatening, in case they

refused, to lay waste their city and island in such a manner, that not

the least footsteps of it should remain. However, the inhabitants of Cos

were not under the least terror. They made answer, that the menaces of

Darius and Xerxes had not been able to prevail with them to give them

earth and water, or to obey their orders; that Artaxerxes' threats

would be equally impotent; that, let what would be the consequence, they

would never give up their fellow citizens; and that they depended upon

the protection of the gods.

"Hippocrates had said in one of his letters, that he owed himself

entirely to his country. And, indeed, the instant he was sent for to

Athens, he went thither, and did not once stir out of the city till the

plague had ceased. He devoted himself entirely to the service of the

sick; and, to multiply himself, as it were, he sent several of his

disciples into all parts of the country, after having instructed them in

what manner to treat their patients. The Athenians were struck with the

deepest sense of gratitude for this generous care. They therefore

ordained, by a public decree, that Hippocrates should be initiated in

the most exalted mysteries, in the same manner as Hercules the son of

Jupiter; that a crown of gold should be presented him, of the value of a

thousand staters[49], and that the decree by which it was granted him,

should be read aloud by a herald in the public games, on the solemn

festival of Panathenæa: that the freedom of the city should be given

him, and himself be maintained at the public charge, in the Prytaneum

all his lifetime, in case he thought proper: in fine, that the children

of all the people of Cos, whose city had given birth to so great a man,

might be maintained and brought up in Athens, in the same manner."

In the time of Agis and Pausanias, kings of Lacedemonia, Lysander was

sent to besiege Athens. He arrived, therefore, at the Piræus, with a

fleet of one hundred and fifty sail, and prevented all other ships from

coming in or going out. The Athenians, besieged by land and sea, without

provisions, ships, hope of relief, or any resources, sent deputies to

Agis, to propose a treaty with Sparta, upon condition of abandoning all

their possessions, the city and port only excepted. He referred the

deputies to Lacedemon, as not being empowered to treat with them. When

they arrived at Salasia, upon the frontier of Sparta, and had made known

their commission to the Ephori, they were ordered to retire, and to come

with other proposals, if they expected a peace. The Ephori had demanded,

"that one thousand two hundred paces of the wall on each side of the

Piræus should he demolished;" but an Athenian, for venturing to advise a

compliance, was sent to prison, and prohibition made against proposing

any thing of that kind for the future.

The Corinthians and several other allies, especially the Thebans,

insisted that it was absolutely necessary to destroy the city without

hearkening any further to a treaty. But the Lacedemonians, preferring

the glory and safety of Greece to their own grandeur, made answer, that

they would never be reproached with having destroyed a city that had

rendered such great services to all Greece; the remembrance of which

ought to have much greater weight with the allies than the remembrance

of private injuries received from it. A peace was, therefore, concluded

under these conditions:--"that the fortifications of the Piræus, with

the long wall that joined that port to the city, should be demolished;

that the Athenians should deliver up all their galleys, twelve only

excepted; that they should abandon all the cities they had seized, and

content themselves with their own lands and country." The deputies, on

their return, were surrounded by an innumerable throng of people, who

apprehended that nothing had been concluded; for they were not able to

hold out any longer, such multitudes dying of famine. The next day they

reported the success of their negociation; the treaty was ratified, and

Lysander, followed by the exiles, entered the port. It was on the very

day the Athenians had formerly gained the famous battle of Salamis. He

caused the works to be demolished to the sound of flutes and trumpets,

as if all Greece had that day regained its liberty. Thus ended the

Peloponnesian war, after having continued during the space of

twenty-seven years.

The walls, thus demolished, were rebuilt by Conon. He did more; he

restored Athens to its former splendour, and rendered it more formidable

to its enemies than it had ever been before.

Philip[50] having gained the battle of Cheronæa, Greece, and above all,

Athens, received a blow from which she never recovered. It was generally

expected, that Philip would avail himself of this opportunity of

entirely crushing his inveterate enemy. That prudent prince, however,

foresaw that powerful obstacles were yet to be encountered, and that

there was still a spirit in the Athenian people which might render it

difficult to hold them in subjection. It would appear, also, says an

elegant writer, as if the genius and fame of Athens had, in the hour of

her calamity, thrown a shield over her: for Philip is reported to have

said, "Have I done so much for glory, and shall I destroy the theatre of

that glory?" A treaty, in consequence, was entered into; and thus the

Athenians, though reluctant to exist by Philip's clemency, were

permitted to retain the whole Attic territory.

The number of men able to bear arms at Athens, in the reign of Cecrops,

was computed at twenty thousand; and there appears to have been no

considerable augmentation in the more civilised age of Pericles; but in

the time of Demetrius Phalareus, there were found twenty-one thousand

citizens, ten thousand foreigners, and forty thousand slaves.

Philip[51], son of Demetrius of Macedon, seems to have been one of the

most inveterate enemies by whom Athens was ever ravaged. With unsparing

cruelty he destroyed almost every thing which had either escaped the

Persian invaders, or which had been erected after their final expulsion.

Livy tells us, that, not content with burning and destroying the temples

of the gods, he ordered that the very stones should be broken into small

pieces, that they might no longer serve to repair the buildings; and

Diodorus Siculus asserts, that even the inviolability of the sepulchres

could not command his respect, or repress his violence.

Athens, however, still recovered some portion of its power; for when

Sylla arrived before the Piræus, he found the walls to be sixty feet

high, and entirely of hewn stone. The work was very strong, and had been

raised by order of Pericles in the Peloponnesian war: when, the hopes of

victory depending solely upon this port, he had fortified it to the

utmost of his power.

The height of the walls did not deter Sylla. He employed all sorts of

engines in battering them, and made continual assaults. He spared

neither danger, attacks, nor expense, to hasten the conclusion of the

war. Without enumerating the rest of the warlike stores and equipage,

twenty thousand mules were perpetually employed in working the machines

only. Wood happening to fall short, from the great consumption made of

it in the machines, which were often either broken or spoiled by the

vast weight they carried, or burned by the enemy, he did not spare the

sacred groves. He cut down the trees in the walks of the Academy and

Lycæum, which were the finest and best planted in the suburbs, and

caused the high walls that joined the port to the city to be demolished,

in order to make use of the ruins in erecting his works, and carrying on

his operations.

Notwithstanding all disadvantages, the Athenians defended themselves

like lions. They found means either to burn most of the machines erected

against the walls, or by undermining them, to throw them down and break

them to pieces. The Romans, on their side, behaved with no less vigour.

Sylla, discouraged by so obstinate a defence, resolved to attack the

Piræus no longer, and confined himself to reduce the place by famine.

The city was now at the last extremity; a bushel of barley having been

sold in it for a thousand drachms (about 25_l._ sterling). In the midst

of the public misery, the governor, who was a lieutenant of Mithridates,

passed his days and nights in debauch. The senators and priests went to

throw themselves at his feet, conjuring him to have pity on the city,

and to obtain a capitulation from Sylla; he dispersed them with

arrow-shot, and in that manner drove them from his presence.

He did not demand a cessation of arms, nor send deputies to Sylla, till

reduced to the last extremity. As those deputies made no proposals, and

asked nothing of him to the purpose, but ran on in praising and

extolling Theseus, Eumolpus, and the exploits of the Athenians against

the Medes, Sylla was tired of their discourse, and interrupted them by

saying,--"Gentlemen haranguers, you may go back again, and keep your

rhetorical flourishes to yourselves. For my part, I was not sent to

Athens to be informed of your ancient prowess, but to chastise your

modern revolt."

During this audience, some spies having entered the city, overheard by

chance some old men talking of the quarter called Ceramicus (the public

place at Athens), and blaming the tyrant exceedingly for not guarding a

certain part of the wall that was the only place by which the enemy

could scale the walls. At their return into the camp, they related what

they heard to Sylla. The parley had been to no purpose. Sylla did not

neglect the intelligence given him. The next night he went in person to

take a view of the place; and finding the wall actually accessible, he

ordered ladders to be raised against it, began the attack there, and,

having made himself master of the wall, after a weak resistance, entered

the city. He would not suffer it to be set on fire, but abandoned it to

be plundered by his soldiers, who, in several houses, found human flesh,

which had been dressed to be eaten. A dreadful slaughter ensued. The

next day all the slaves were sold by auction, and liberty was granted to

the citizens who had escaped the swords of the soldiers, who were a very

small number. He besieged the citadel the same day, where Aristion and

those who had taken refuge there, were soon so much reduced by famine,

that they were forced to surrender themselves. The tyrant, his guards,

and all who had been in any office under him, were put to death. Some

ten days after, Sylla made himself master of the Piæaus, and burned all

its fortifications.

The reputation for learning, military valour, and polished elegance,

which Athens enjoyed during the splendid administration of Pericles, was

tarnished by the corruption which that celebrated person introduced.

Prosperity was the forerunner of luxury and universal dissipation; every

delicacy was drawn from distant nations; the wines of Cyprus, and the

snows of Thrace, garlands of roses, perfumes, and a thousand arts of

buffoonery, which disgraced a Persian court, were introduced; instead of

the coarse meals, the herbs and plain bread, which the laws of Solon

had recommended, and which had nourished the heroes of Marathon and

Salamis.

Sylla's assault was the final termination of the power and greatness of

Athens; she became a portion of the Roman empire; but in the reign of

Hadrian and the Antonines, she resumed, at least in outward appearance,

no small portion of her former splendour. Hadrian built several temples,

and, above all, he finished that of Jupiter Olympius, the work of

successive kings, and one of the greatest productions of human art. He

founded, also, a splendid library; and bestowed so many privileges, that

an inscription, placed on one of the gates, declared Athens to be no

longer the city of Theseus, but of Hadrian. In what manner it was

regarded too in the time of Trajan, may be gathered from Pliny's letter

to a person named Maximus, who was sent thither as governor.

"Remember," said he, "that you are going to visit Achaia, the proper and

true Greece; that you are appointed to govern a state of free cities,

who have maintained liberty by their valour. Take not away any thing of

their privileges, their dignity; no, nor yet of their presumption; but

consider it is a country that hath of long time given laws, and received

none; that it is to Athens thou goest, where it would be thought a

barbarous cruelty in thee to deprive them of that shadow and name of

liberty which still remaineth to them."

The Antonines trod in the steps of Hadrian. Under them Herodes Atticus

devoted an immense fortune to the embellishment of the city and the

promotion of learning.

But when the Roman world felt the wand of adversity, and her power began

to decline, Athens felt her share; she had enjoyed a long respite from

foreign war, but in the reign of Arcadius and Honorius a dreadful

tempest burst upon her.

Alaric, after over-running the rest of Greece, advanced into Attica, and

found Athens without any power of defence. The whole country was

converted into a desert; but it seems uncertain, whether he plundered

the city, or whether he accepted the greater part of its wealth as a

ransom. Certain, however, it is, that it suffered severely, and a

contemporary compared it to the mere skin of a slaughtered victim.

It is reported that, during their stay in the city, the barbarians,

having collected all the libraries of Athens, were preparing to burn

them; but one of their number diverted them from their design, by

suggesting the propriety of leaving to their enemies what appeared to be

the most effectual instrument for cherishing and promoting their

unwarlike spirit.

After the devastations of Alaric, and, still more, after the shutting up

of her schools, Athens ceased almost entirely to attract the attention

of mankind. These schools were suppressed by an edict of Justinian; an

edict which excited great grief and indignation among the few remaining

votaries of Grecian science and superstition. Seven friends and

philosophers,[52] who dissented from the religion of their sovereign,

resolved to seek in a foreign land the freedom of which they were

deprived in their native country. Accordingly, the seven sages sought an

asylum in Persia, under the protection of Chosroes; but, disgusted and

disappointed, they hastily returned, and declared that they had rather

die on the borders of the empire than enjoy the wealth and favour of the

barbarian. These associates ended their lives in peace and obscurity;

and as they left no disciples, they terminate the long list of

philosophers who may be justly praised, notwithstanding their defects,

as the wisest and most virtuous of their times[53].

After the taking of Constantinople by the Latins, in the beginning of

the thirteenth century, the western powers began to view Greece as an

object of ambition. In the division of the Greek empire, which they made

among themselves, Greece and Macedonia fell to the share of the Marquis

of Montferrat, who bestowed Athens and Thebes on one of his followers,

named Otho de la Roche. This prince reigned with the title of Duke of

Athens, which remained for a considerable time[54].

It was afterwards seized by a powerful Florentine family, named

Acciaioli, one of whom sold it to the Venetians; but his son seized it

again, and it remained in that family till A.D. 1455, when it

surrendered to Omar, a general of Mahomet II., and thus formed one of

the two hundred cities which that prince took from the Christians. He

settled a colony in it, and incorporated it completely with the Turkish

empire. What has occurred of late years has not been embodied in any

authentic history; but the consequences of the tumults of Greece may be

in some degree imagined, from what is stated by a recent traveller in

regard to Athens[55]. "When I sallied forth to explore the wonders of

Athens, alas! they were no longer to be seen. The once proud city of

marble was literally a mass of ruins--the inglorious ruins of mud-houses

and wretched mosques forming in all quarters such indistinguishable

piles, that in going about I was wholly unable to fix upon any

peculiarities of streets or buildings, by which I might know my way from

one part of the capital to another. With the exception of the remains of

the Forum, the temple of Theseus, which is still in excellent

preservation, the celebrated columns of the temple of Jupiter Olympius,

and the Parthenon, nothing now exists at Athens of all the splendid

edifices with which it was so profusely decorated in the days of its

glory."

It has been well observed, that, associated in the youthful mind with

all that is noble in patriotism, exalted in wisdom, excelling in art,

elegant in literature, luminous in science, persuasive in eloquence, and

heroic in action, the beautiful country of Greece, and its inhabitants,

must, under every circumstance, even of degradation, be an interesting

object of study. "We can all feel, or imagine," says Lord Byron, "the

regret with which the ruins of cities, once the capital of empires, are

beheld. But never did the littleness of man, and the vanity of his very

best virtues, of patriotism to exalt and of valour to defend his

country, appear more conspicuous than in the record of what Athens once

was, and the certainty of what she now is."

The former state of Athens is thus described by Barthelemy. "There is

not a city in Greece which presents so vast a number of public buildings

and monuments as Athens. Edifices, venerable for their antiquity, or

admirable for their elegance, raise their majestic heads on all sides.

Masterpieces of sculpture are extremely numerous, even in the public

places, and concur with the finest productions of the pencil to

embellish the porticoes of temples. Here every thing speaks to the eyes

of the attentive spectator."

To describe Athens entire would be to fill a volume. We shall,

therefore, only give an account of the chief monuments of antiquity as

they existed till very lately; the rest, as they give one little or no

sort of idea of their ancient magnificence, were better omitted than

mentioned.

The Piræus[56] is one of the finest ports in Greece, and, being bounded

by rocks, has experienced hardly any change in its form or dimensions.

The sea, however, appears to have encroached a little, as some ruins are

seen under water. The general depth of the port is from two to ten

fathoms, in some places twenty. The Piræus was decorated with a theatre,

several temples, and a great number of statues. As the existence of

Athens depended on the safety of this harbour, Themistocles secured it

against sudden attack by building a wall, sixty stadia in length, and

forty cubits high. As to its thickness, it was greater than the space

occupied by two waggons. It was built of huge square stones, fastened

together on the outside by iron and leaden cramps. Without the gate was

a cenotaph, erected in honour of Euripides, on which was inscribed "The

glory of Euripides has all Greece for a monument."

The old city of Athens was seated on the top of a rock in the midst of a

pleasant plain, which, as the number of inhabitants increased, became

full of buildings, which induced the distinction of Acro and Catapolis,

_i. e._, of the upper and lower city.

The inside of the citadel was adorned with a multitude of edifices. The

flat space on the rock of the Acropolis is not more than eight hundred

feet in length, and about four hundred feet in breadth,--a small extent

for the site of the primitive city of the Athenians; but an area of

great size, when considered as the base only of temples and marble

palaces, containing not a single structure which might not be

denominated a masterpiece of art[57]. The most remarkable of these were

a magnificent temple of Minerva, styled Parthenon, because that goddess

was a virgin--this the Persians destroyed, out it was rebuilt with still

greater splendour by Pericles--the temple of Neptune and Minerva

jointly; a temple dedicated to Victory, adorned with paintings,

principally the work of Polygnotus, and constructed of white marble.

Within the citadel, also, was an immense number of statues, erected by

religion and gratitude, on which the chisels of Myron, Phidias,

Alcamenes, and other artists of renown, seemed to have bestowed

animation. Of these statues, some were those of famous Athenian

generals; such as Pericles, Phormio, Iphicrates, and Timotheus; and

others, those of the gods.

It appears surprising that so many temples should have been crowded

together within the narrow compass of the Athenian Acropolis; but the

Roman Capitol, though not much more spacious, contained at least thirty

temples[58].

"In its pride and glory," says Chandler, "the Acropolis appeared as one

entire offering to the deity, surpassing in excellence, and astonishing

in richness. Heliodorus employed on it fifteen books. The curiosities of

various kinds, with the pictures, statues, and pieces of sculpture, were

so many and so remarkable, as to supply Polemo Periegetes with matter

for four volumes; and Strabo affirms, that as many more would be

required in treating of Athens and of Attica.

As the stranger draws near to the present entrance of the citadel, he

passes before the façade of the Propylea; the old entrance to the

Acropolis, between its Doric pillars, being walled up. Pausanias says,

"There is only one entrance to the Acropolis of Athens; it being in

every remaining part of its circuit a precipice, and fortified by strong

walls. This entrance was fronted by a magnificent building, called the

Propylea, covered with roofs of white marble, which surpassed, for

beauty and the dimensions of the marble, all that I have seen." This is

now in ruins.

This was the most expensive work undertaken by Pericles, and is said to

have cost 2,500 talents (£452,700). It took five years in building, and

was completed B.C. 437.

"To a person who has seen the ruins of Rome," says Dr. Clarke, "the

first suggestion, made by a sight of the buildings in the Acropolis, is

that of the infinite superiority of the Athenian architecture. It

possesses the greatness and majesty of the Egyptian or of the ancient

Etruscan style, with all the elegant proportion, the rich ornaments, and

the discriminating taste of the most splendid era of the arts." Its

present condition is thus described by Mr. Williams. "The scene of

desolation in the Acropolis is complete; the heaps of ruins of wretched

houses, and various buildings, are constructed part with clay and

marble, the marble looking doleful through the mud. On entering the

temple one is struck by the worn steps, and curved or circular marks of

the great doors of old; the pavement, too, that had been trodden by the

luminaries of Greece."

The walls of the Acropolis[59] exhibit three distinct periods of

construction; that is to say, the masonry of _modern_ times in the

repairs,--a style of building which can only be referred to the age of

_Cimon_, or of _Pericles_;--and the ancient _Pelasgic_ work, as

mentioned by Lucian. The _modern_ walls of the city are about ten feet

high, and not two in thickness. They were constructed about the year

1780, as a defence against pirates and hordes of Arnauts, who sometimes

entered the town at night, and threatened to pillage it. The walls

embrace a circuit of nearly three miles, and enclose not only the town

and citadel, but also some open spaces for cattle. They were built in

seventy-five days, all hands being employed night and day. All kinds of

materials which were at hand were employed in their construction, and in

some places they exhibit large blocks of stone and marble, and several

fragmental inscriptions[60].

The lower city had thirteen gates, and among the principal edifices

which adorned it were, 1. The Olympian temple, erected in honour of

Athens and all Greece. 2. The Pantheon, dedicated to all the gods; a

noble structure, supported by one hundred and twenty marble pillars, and

having over its great gateway two horses, carved by Praxiteles. 3. The

temple of Theseus; a noble structure, of Pentelic marble.

The Gymnasia of Athens were many, but the most remarkable were the

Lyceum, Academia, and Cynosarges. The Lyceum stood on the banks of the

Ilissus; some say it was built by Pisistratus; others by Pericles;

others by Lycurgus.

The Academy was so called from Academus. The Cynosarges was a place in

the suburbs, not far from the Lyceum.

The Areopagus is situated a few hundred feet west of the Acropolis. It

consists of an insulated rock, precipitous, and broken towards the

south; on the north side it slopes gently down towards the temple of

Theseus, and is rather lower than the Acropolis. "Higher up, ascending

a hill covered with thistles and red pebbles, you arrive," says M. La

Martine, "at the Pnyx; the scene of the stormy assemblies of the people

of Athens, and of the fluctuating triumphs of its orators or its

favourites; enormous masses of black stone, some of which measure twelve

or thirteen cubic feet, lie upon one another, and support the terrace,

upon which the people collected. Still higher up, at the distance of

about fifty paces, we perceive a huge square block, wherein steps have

been cut, which probably served for the orator to mount his tribunal,

which thus overlooked the people, the city, and the sea. This possesses

not the character of the people of Pericles, but seems Roman. The

recollections it inspires are, however, delightful. Demosthenes spoke

from thence, and roused or calmed that popular sea, more stormy than the

Ægean, which he could also hear roll behind him."

"From the odeum of Regilla," says Dr. Clarke, "we went to the Areopagus,

wishing to place our feet upon a spot where it is so decidedly known

that St. Paul had himself stood; and to view with our own eyes the same

scene which he beheld, when he declared unto the Athenians the nature of

the UNKNOWN GOD, whom they so ignorantly worshipped. * * * We ascended

to the top by means of steps cut within the natural stone, which is of

breccia. The sublime scene here exhibited is so striking, that a brief

description of it may prove how truly it offers to us a commentary upon

St. Paul's words, as they were delivered upon the spot. Before him there

was spread a glorious prospect of mountains, islands, seas, and skies;

behind him towered the lofty Acropolis, crowned with all its marble

temples. This very object, whether in the face of nature, or among the

works of art, conspired to elevate the mind, and to fill it with

reverence towards that BEING, 'who made and governs the world;' who

sitteth in that light which no mortal eye can approach, and yet is nigh

unto the meanest of his creatures; 'in whom we live, and move, and have

our being.'"

Near the Piræan gate is still to be seen, in a state of admirable

preservation, the ground-plot and entire town of the Pnyx, or place of

_parliament_ of the Athenians, as it was appropriated by Solon to the

use of the citizens. Nearly the whole of it is an excavation of the

rock, and the several parts of it were carved in stone of one solid

mass, with the exception only of the semi-circular area, the farthest

part of which consists of masonry. "To approach the spot," says Dr.

Clarke, "once dignified by the presence of the greatest Grecian orators,

to set our feet where they stood, and actually to behold the place where

Demosthenes addressed 'the men of Athens,' calling to mind the most

memorable examples of his eloquence, is a gratification of an exalted

nature. But the feelings excited in viewing the Pnyx, peculiarly affect

Englishmen: that holy fire, so much dreaded by the Athenian tyrants, and

which this place had such a remarkable tendency to agitate, burns yet in

Britain; it is the very soul of her liberties, and it strengthens the

security of her laws; giving eloquence to her senate, heroism to her

armies, extension to her commerce, and freedom to her people: although

annihilated in almost every country of the earth, it lives in England,

and its extinction there, like the going out of the sacred flame in the

temple of Delphi, would be felt as a national calamity."

Among the loose fragments, dispersed in the Acropolis, has been found a

small piece of marble, with an inscription, but in so imperfect a state,

that Dr. Clarke considered it only worth notice as a memorial of the

place where it was found, and in its allusion to the Prytaneum, which is

the only legible part of it.

The Prytaneum, where the written laws of Solon were kept, however, was

not in the Acropolis, but in a lower part of the city. The Gymnasium of

Ptolemy, which stands near the temple of Theseus, is greatly

dilapidated, and, in no small degree, concealed by dwellings[61]. The

Erectheum is situated about one hundred and fifty feet to the north of

the Parthenon. This structure consisted of two contiguous temples; that

of Minerva Polias, with its portico towards the east; and that of

Pandrosus towards the west, with its two porticoes standing by the north

and south angles, the entrance to the Pandroseum being on the northern

side. The Turks made a powder-magazine of one of the vestibules of this

building, which contains one of the finest specimens of Ionian

architecture now existing; and it has been judiciously remarked of the

sculpture, every where displayed in this edifice, that it is difficult

to conceive how marble has been wrought to such a depth, and brought to

so sharp an edge, the ornaments having all the delicacy of works of

metal.

In that portion of the Erectheum which was dedicated to Minerva Polias,

the columns of the front porch are standing, but without any part of

their entablature. The marble[62] of this ruin is of virgin whiteness;

and the workmanship, as the structure is very diminutive in comparison

with the specimens of the Parthenon, is a still more exquisite example

than that temple, of the polish and edge which were given to all the

parts of Grecian architecture. The line of no pencil can excel the

delicate accuracy of contour in the swell of the torus, and the

ornaments of the base; and the hand, in passing repeatedly over the

marble, seeks in vain for the slightest inequality or even roughness on

the surface.

A bluish-grey limestone[63] seems to have been used in some of the

works; particularly in the exquisite ornaments of the Erectheum, where

the frieze of the temple and of its porticoes are not of marble like the

rest of the building, but of this sort of slate-limestone. This

resembles the limestone employed in the walls of the cella at the temple

of Ceres, at Eleusis, and in buildings before the use of marble was

known for purposes of architecture: such, for example, is the sort of

stone employed in the temple of Apollo at Phigalia, and in other

edifices of equal antiquity; it effervesces briskly in acids, and has

all the properties of common compact lime, except that it is hard enough

to cut glass, and, of course, is susceptible of a fine polish,

exhibiting a flat conchoidal fracture, which is somewhat splintery. We

could not discover a single fragment of porphyry; which was remarkable,

as this substance was almost always used by the ancients in works of

great magnificence.

The temple of ANCHESMIAN JUPITER stood upon a commanding eminence. The

pagan shrine has been succeeded by a small Christian sanctuary. Of the

scene from the top of this steep and craggy rock, Wheler speaks in a

style of enthusiasm, rather unfrequent with him:--"I wish I could make

you taste the same satisfaction, while I describe the prospect, that I

then did, and still do, when I consider it. Here, either a Democritus

might sit and laugh at the pomps and vanities of the world, whose

glories so soon vanish; or a Heraclitus weep over the manifold

misfortunes of it, telling sad stories of the various changes and events

of life. This would have been a place to inspire a poet, as the brave

actions, performed within his view, have already exercised the pens of

great historians. Here, like Virgil, he might have sate, and interwoven

beautiful descriptions of the rivers, mountains, woods of olives, and

groves of lemons and oranges, with the celebrated harbours on the shores

and islands, all lying before him, as on a map, which I was content to

do only in contemplation; and with a sea-compass to mark out the most

considerable places on paper."

The Odeum of Regilla stands at the foot of the rock of the Acropolis.

The remains of this edifice are those which Wheler and all former

travellers, excepting Chandler, have described as the theatre of

Bacchus[64]. Of the _theatre_ of _Bacchus_, nothing remains except the

circular sweep for the seats; as in the earliest ages of dramatic

representation, it was universally formed by scooping the sloping side

of a rock[65]. The[66] passion of the Athenians for the theatre is not

conceivable. Their eyes, their ears, their imagination, their

understanding, all shared in the satisfaction: nothing gave them so

sensible a pleasure in dramatic performances, either tragic or comic,

as the strokes which were aimed at the affairs of the public, whether

some chance occasioned the application, or the address of the poets, who

knew how to reconcile the most remote subjects with the transactions of

the republic. They entered by this means into the interests of the

people, took occasion to soothe their passions, authorise their

pretensions, justify, and sometimes condemn their conduct, entertain

them with agreeable hopes, instruct them in their duty in certain nice

conjunctures; in effecting which they often not only acquired the

applauses of the spectators, but credit and influence in the public

affairs and councils: hence the theatre became so grateful, and so much

the concern of the people[67].

The temple, dedicated to Augustus, consists of four Doric pillars of

white marble, fluted, and, like those of all the other buildings of this

order, without plinths or bases; they still support their architrave

with the pontoon, on the top of which is a square piece of marble,

seeming to have been placed there as the pedestal to some statue. There

seems, also, to be some inscription on it, but by reason of the height,

unintelligible. It is impossible to give a plan of the whole; the

remains of it affording but little light towards discovering what form

it was of.

Of the remains of the Stadium Panathenaicum, the most wonderful of all

the works of Herodes Atticus:--"It has been usual to say of this," says

Dr. Edward Clarke, "that nothing now remains of its former magnificence.

To our eyes, every thing necessary to impress the mind with an accurate

idea of the object itself, and of its grandeur, and of the prodigious

nature of the work, seemed to exist, as if it had been in its perfect

state. The marble covering of the seats, indeed, no longer appears; but

the lines are visible of the different ranges; and perhaps a part of the

covering itself might be brought to light by a removal of the soil."

This memorial of Attic splendour, and of the renown of a private citizen

of Athens, became ultimately his funeral monument; and a very curious

discovery may be reserved for future travellers in the majestic

sepulchre of Herodes himself, who was here interred with the highest

obsequies and most distinguished honours a grateful people could

possibly bestow upon the tomb of a benefactor, who spared no expense for

them while he was living, and every individual of whom participated in

his bounty[68] at his death[69].

Beneath the arch of Hadrian persons are conducted from the old city of

Theseus to the new Athens, built by Hadrian. The stones are put together

without cement; but the work is adorned with a row of Corinthian

pilasters and columns, with bases supporting an upper tier in the same

style of architecture. It was erected commemorative of Hadrian's return

to Athens. A new city had arisen under his auspices. Magnificent

temples, stately shrines, unsullied altars, awaited the benediction of

this sacerdotal monarch; and it would, indeed, have been marvellous if

the Athenians, naturally prone to adulation, neglected to bestow it on a

benefactor so well disposed for its reception. The triumphal arch was of

course prepared, and lasting characters thereon inscribed have

proclaimed to succeeding ages, that "The Athens of Hadrian eclipsed the

city of Theseus[70]."

Besides this arch, there are other remnants of structures erected in

honour of Hadrian. Of these are the stupendous pillars which bear his

name. In the time of Pausanias, there were one hundred and twenty

pillars of Phrygian marble. Of these, sixteen columns of white marble,

each six feet in diameter, and sixty feet in height, now remain; all of

the Corinthian order, beautifully fluted, and of the most exquisite

workmanship. "Certainly," says Wheler, "this was a work alone that may

justify the liberality of Hadrian, and the great care he took to adorn

the city; for this must needs have been a wonderful portico, both for

beauty, use, and grandeur." Pausanias says, that it was enclosed with a

cloister, in which were built rooms of the same stone, only the roofs of

alabaster, gilded with gold, and the whole excellently adorned with

statues and pictures. He founded also a library and a gymnasium.

The Tower or Temple of the Winds[71] is more attractive by its

singularity than its beauty. It was the water-clock, the chronometer,

and the weather guide of Athens. It was built by Andronicus

Cyrrhestes[72]. On the top stood a brazen Triton, contrived so as to

turn round with the wind, and with a wand, that he held in his hand, to

point to the figure of the wind which blew. The Triton is now wanting;

the rest remains entire. It is a small octagon tower; the roof is built

pyramidically. On every side is represented the figure of a wind, with

proper attributes, characterising the nature of it, in very good _basso

rilievo_, and their names written above them in Greek characters. The

god Zephyrus is represented as a beautiful young man, gliding gently

along with an imperceptible motion, with his bosom full of flowers. They

are all drawn with wings, and flying on with more or less rapidity,

according to the violence of each wind in those parts. This structure is

known to be the same which Vitruvius mentions, but it is entirely

unnoticed by Pausanias[73]. Some suppose that it was one of the sacred

structures of the ancient city, and that, as a place of religious

worship, it answered other purposes than that of merely indicating the

direction of the winds, the seasons, and the hours.

As Dr. Clarke drew near to the walls, he beheld the vast Cecropian

citadel, crowned with temples, that originated in the veneration, once

paid to the memory of the illustrious dead, surrounded by objects,

telling the same theme of sepulchral grandeur, and now monuments of

departed greatness, mouldering in all the solemnity of ruin. "So

paramount is this funereal character in the approach to Athens from the

Piræus," says he, "that as we passed the hill of the Museum, which was,

in fact, an ancient cemetery of the Athenians, we might have imagined

ourselves to be among the tombs of Telmessus, from the number of

sepulchres hewn in the rock, and from the antiquity of the workmanship,

evidently not of later date than any thing of the kind in Asia Minor. In

other respects, the city exhibits nearly the appearance so briefly

described by Strabo, eighteen centuries before our coming; and perhaps

it wears a more magnificent aspect, owing to the splendid remains of

Hadrian's temple of Olympian Jove, which did not exist when Athens was

visited by the disciple of Xenacchus."

"The first monument," says La Martine, "which attracts your attention,

is the temple of Olympian Jupiter, the magnificent columns of which rise

alone upon a deserted naked spot, on the right of what was Athens--a

worthy portico of a city in ruins." This temple[74] was pretended by the

Athenians to have been originally founded in the time of Deucalion, and

to have subsisted nine hundred years; but in the end falling into ruin,

it began to be rebuilt by Pisistratus, and having received additions

from several hands during the space of seven hundred years, was

completely finished by the Emperor Hadrian, and dedicated to Jupiter

Olympus, to whose honour the same prince erected a colossal statue of

immense value, both on account of the richness of its materials and the

beauty of its workmanship. Nothing in all Greece, nor even in the whole

world, was equal to the magnificence of this temple. Its area was

computed to be four stadia. The inside was embellished with statues by

the best hands, placed between each column, which were gifts from all

the cities of Greece, that were desirous of paying their court to the

Emperor; among whom the Athenians distinguished themselves by the

colossus, erected by them in honour of the monarch himself. It is

impossible from the remains to collect the plan of the whole building;

there being nothing left but ten beautiful Corinthian pillars, with

their friezes, architraves, and cornices, two fluted, the remaining

eight plain. Close behind the eight, which stand in one rank, is a wall

of white marble, the same as the columns, and, at the south end, the two

that project, being fluted, and on a different line from the others,

seem to have formed the entrance of the temple[75].

The solitary grandeur of these marble ruins[76] is, perhaps, more

striking than the appearance presented by any other object at Athens;

insomuch that the Turks themselves seem to regard them with an eye of

respect and admiration; large parties of them being frequently seen

seated on their carpets, in the long shade of the columns. "Rome," says

Chandler, "afforded no example of this species of building. It was one

of the four marble edifices, which had raised to the pinnacle of renown

the architects who planned them; men, it is said, admired in the

assembly of the gods for their wisdom and excellence."

Of this temple seventeen columns were standing in 1676; but, a few years

before Chandler arrived at Athens, one was thrown down, for the purpose

of building a new mosque in the market-place.

Some of the columns still support their architraves, as we have before

stated, one of which was found to equal three feet in width, and

although of one entire piece of marble, it extended in length twenty-two

feet six inches. On the top of the entablature is shown the dwelling of

a hermit, who fixed his abode upon this eminence, and dedicated his life

entirely to the contemplation of the sublime objects by which his

residence was on all sides surrounded.

The beauty of the temple of Theseus[77] is not at all prejudiced by its

littleness; but still remains a masterpiece of architecture, not easy to

be paralleled, much less exceeded. Much of the history of Theseus is

expressed in relievo, on the pronaos of the front and west end, where

all the tricks and art of wrestling seem well expressed. There are,

also, some in women's habits, to express the war of the Amazons.

This elegant building[78] is supposed to have furnished the model of the

Parthenon, which resembles it in the most essential points, though it is

nearly of double the size. Indeed, the Theseion impresses the beholder

more by its symmetry than its magnitude. It is now converted into a

Christian church. "On approaching the temple of Theseus," says La

Martine, "though convinced by what I had read of its beauty, I was

astonished to find myself quite unmoved; my heart sought to bestir

itself; my eye sought to admire; but in vain. I felt what one always

feels at the sight of a work without faults,--a negative pleasure,--but

as to a real, strong impression, a sense of powerful or involuntary

delight, I experienced nothing. This temple is too small; it is a kind

of sublime plaything of art. It is not a monument for the gods; nor even

for men for ages. I felt but one instant of ecstacy, and that was when,

seated at the western angle of the temple, on its last steps, my eye

embraced, at one glance, the magnificent harmony of its forms, the

majestic elegance of its columns, the empty and more sombre space of its

portico; and on its internal frieze, the combats of the Centaurs and the

Lapithæ; and above, through the opening of the centre, the blue and

resplendent sky, shedding a serene and mystical light on the cornices

and the projecting slopes of the bassi-rilievi, which seem to live and

to move." All this seems rather extraordinary.

"On your way from Piræum to the city of Athens," says Lord Sandwich,

"you pass all along the ruins of Themistocles' wall. The road is in the

middle of a beautiful plain, covered with vineyards and olive trees,

which, being bounded on one side by mountains, and on the other by the

sea, affords a most delightful prospect. Before your entrance into the

city, the first monument of antiquity that presents itself to your view,

is the temple of Theseus, built by the Athenians, in honour of that

hero, soon after the battle of Marathon. This temple was allowed the

privilege of being a sanctuary for all fugitives, in memory that

Theseus, in his lifetime, protected the distressed. It cannot be too

much commended, both on account of the beauty of the materials and

regularity of the architecture; besides which, it has the advantage of

being in a manner entire, there being nothing wanting to it but a small

part of the roof."

In spite of its beauty, what says Monsieur La Martine? "No; the temple

of Theseus is not worthy of its fame; it cannot be said to live as a

monument. It is not suggestive of what it ought to be. It is beautiful,

no doubt; but it is a kind of frigid, dead beauty, of which the artist

alone ought to go and shake the shroud, and wipe the dust. As for me, I

admired unquestionably; but quitted it without any desire to see it

again. The beautiful stones of the columns of the Vatican, the majestic

colossal shadows of St. Peters at Rome, never suffered me to leave them

without regret, or the hope of return." Can all this be real? or is it

merely an affectation?

"During our residence of ten weeks," says Sir John Hobhouse, "there was

not, I believe, a day of which we did not devote a part to the

contemplation of the noble monuments of Grecian genius, that have

outlived the ravages of time, and the outrage of barbarous and

antiquarian despoilers. The temple of Theseus, which was within five

minutes' walk of our lodgings, is the most perfect ancient edifice in

the world. In this fabric, the most enduring stability, and a simplicity

of design peculiarly striking, are united with the highest elegance and

accuracy of workmanship, the characteristics of the Doric style; whose

chaste beauty is not, in the opinion of the first artists, to be

equalled by the graces of any of the other orders."

"That the Theseion was originally a tomb," says Dr. Clarke, "like other

Grecian temples, is scarcely to be doubted. The building is believed to

bear date from the event mentioned by Plutarch, when, after the conquest

of Scyros, the son of Miltiades arrived in Athens, bearing the

mouldering bones and weapons he had discovered. This occurred during the

archonship of Apsepion; so that the Theseion has now braved the attacks

of time, of earthquakes, and of barbarians, during a lapse of

considerably above two thousand years."

This beautiful Doric temple[79], more resembling in the style of its

architecture the temples of Pæstum, than that of Minerva in the

Acropolis, and the most entire of any of the structures of ancient

Greece, were it not for the damage which the sculpture has sustained,

may be considered as still perfect. The ruined state of the metopes and

frieze has proved a very fortunate circumstance; for it was owing solely

to this that the building escaped the ravages which were going on in the

Parthenon. The entire edifice is of Pentelican marble. It stands east

and west, the principal front facing the east; and it is that kind of

building which was called by ancient architects, as it is expressed in

the language of Vitruvius and explained by Stuart, a Peripteros; that is

to say, it has a portico of six columns in each front, and on each side

a range of eleven columns, exclusive of the columns on the angles. All

these columns remain in their original position, excepting two, that

separated the portico from the pronaos, which have been demolished. Like

all pillars raised according to the most _ancient_ Doric style of

buildings, they are without bases or pedestals; standing with

inexpressible dignity and simplicity upon the pavement of the covered

walk around the cell of the temple. Some of the metopes represent the

labours of Hercules; others the exploits of Theseus; and there are some

which were never adorned with any sculpture. Above the antæ of the

pronaos is a sculptured frieze, the subject of which cannot now be

determined; and the battle of the Centaurs and Lapithæ is represented

upon a similar frieze of the porticoes. In the tympanum of the pediment,

over the eastern front, Stuart observed several holes in the marble,

where metal cramps had been fixed for sustaining sculpture in entire

relief, as over the eastern entrance to the Parthenon. The action of the

atmosphere in this fine climate upon the marble has diffused over the

whole edifice, as over the buildings in the Acropolis, a warm ochreous

tint, which is peculiar to the ruins of Athens. It bears no resemblance

to the black and dingy hue, which is acquired by all works in stone and

marble, when they have been exposed to the open air in the more

northern countries of Europe, and especially in England. Perhaps to this

warm colour, so remarkably characterizing the remains of ancient

buildings at Athens, Plutarch alluded in that beautiful passage, cited

by Chandler, when he affirmed that the structures of Pericles possessed

a peculiar and unparalleled excellence of character. "A certain

freshness bloomed upon them," says he, "and preserved their faces

uninjured, as if they possessed a never-fading spirit, and had a soul

insensible to age."

The monument of THRASYLLUS,--an elegant little fabric,--was erected 318

B.C. It is a structure of Pentelic marble, simple, yet highly finished.

Its entire height is twenty-nine feet five inches.

"How majestic, and how perfect in its preservation," says Dr. Clarke,

"rises the Choragic monument of Thrasyllus; and how sublime the whole

group of objects with which it is associated. At the time of our visit,

and before the work of dilapidation had commenced, the ancient sun-dial,

the statue of the god, the pillars for the tripods, the majestic

citadel;--the last of these has, indeed, defied the desolating ravages

of barbaric power; but who shall again behold the other objects in this

affecting scene as they then appeared? or in what distant country and

obscure retreat may we look for their mutilated fragments?"

The monument of PHILOPAPPUS[80] stands upon the hill of Musæus, where

that celebrated poet is said to have been buried. It is within the walls

of the ancient city, though at some distance from those of the modern

one; and the view from it of the citadel of Athens and the neighbouring

territories is very striking; for, looking towards the sea, the eye

commands the ports of the Piræus, Munychia, and Phalerus; the isles of

Salamis and Ægina, and the mountains of Peloponnesus, as far as the

gulf of Argos. It originally consisted of three compartments between

four Corinthian pilasters; that is to say, of an arched recess,

containing a central sitting figure, having a square niche on each side

of it. Below these appeared three superb sculptures in relief. That in

the centre, beneath the sitting statue, exhibits Trajan in a car, drawn

by four horses, as he is represented on many monuments of that emperor.

On either side, in square compartments, were seen the attendants,

preceding and following the triumphal car.

Philopappus' monument, says Mr. Dodwell, has its faults and

deficiencies; but it is an elegant and imposing object. In the interior

of the basement are some blocks of the grey Hymettian marble, and the

soft stone from the Piræus. The superstructure is of Pentelic marble.

It is a structure of white marble, says another writer, built a

proportionable height, something circular. In the middle was a large

niche, with a figure of marble sitting in it, and under his feet, in

large letters,--"Philopappus, son of Epiphanes of Besa." Wheler found a

still longer inscription, in Latin, which he thus translates:--

_Caius, Julius, Philopappus, son of Caius, of the tribe of Fabia,

Consul, Frater Arvalis, chosen among the Prætors by the most good and

august Emperor Cæsar, Nerva, Trajanus, who conquered the Germans and

Dacians._

Among the inscriptions in this city may be noted one on a large marble

stone, standing on end, in the wall of a private house, relating to the

sale of oil; and as it teaches many things we shall cite it, as

translated by Wheler:--

_The law edict of the God-like Hadrian._

"'Let those that cultivate the oyl bring the third part to the office,

or those that possess the ground of the Proconsul, which the ... has

sold, their eighth part, for they only have that right. But let them

bring it at the same time. * * * (Thence eight lines are imperfect, and

then it followeth:--) 'Let it be taken upon oath, how much hath been

gathered in all, as well by his slaves as by his freemen; but if he

selleth the fruit, the landlord or the tenant, or the buyer of the crop,

shall be written with them; and he that has sold it for transportation

shall give an account how much he has sold it for, and to whom and

whither bound. And let the merchant write what he hath embarked, and of

whom, and whither he is bound. * * * But he that shall be found to give

false accounts, either of the receipt of transportation, or concerning

the country, their freight shall be confiscated; still those possessing

the lands of the proconsul excepted if they bring their ... part.'"

(Here half a dozen lines are defaced, and, then he proceeds again:--)

"'Let him retain the half. But if he doth not receive half, let the

public take half. * * * And let the merchant write what he hath

transported, and how much of every body. But if he shall be apprehended

not to have given his account, let him be stopped; or if he sail away,

let his merchandise be forfeited. But if he shall avoid it by hoisting

sails, let them write to his country, or to me, under the testimony of

the commons; if any of the ship shall allege it necessary, the prætor

shall convocate the senate the next day; but if the matter shall exceed

fifty amphoræ, let it be brought to the congregation, and half given to

the discoverer. But if any one shall yet appeal to me or my proconsuls,

let the commons choose syndics, that all things which are done against

evil doers may be executed without reproof.'" Some lines more yet

remain, which are less preserved.

The majority of the Athenian churches[81] are built upon the ruins of

ancient temples, and are composed of blocks of stone and marble, with a

great number of inscriptions, altars, pedestals, and architectural

ornaments. "As we passed through the town," says Dr. Clarke, "there was

hardly a house, that had not some little marble fragments of ancient

sculpture stuck in its front, over its door."

At Athens four ancient buildings[82] have been entirely destroyed within

these few years; a small Ionic temple in the Acropolis; another temple,

supposed to be of Ceres, near the Ilissus, or bridge over that stream,

and the aqueduct of Antoninus Pius. Part also of the propylæan columns

have been thrown down, with a mass of the architrave on the western

front of the Erectheion, and one of the columns of the Olympeion. In

fact, more than forty of the temples and public buildings[83], which are

mentioned by Pausanias, have so totally disappeared, as not to leave a

trace, by which it is possible to identify their situation: and this

leads us to the Parthenon, which we have purposely left to the last,

because the wrong done to it of late years, by a nobleman of Scotland,

has been the means of introducing to our own country a taste for the

elegant and beautiful, which it never enjoyed before.

"The Parthenon," says Mr. Dodwell, "at first sight rather disappointed

my expectations, and appeared less than its fame. The eye, however, soon

becomes filled with the magnitude of its dimensions, the beauty of its

materials, the exquisite perfection of its symmetry, and the harmonious

analogy of its proportions. It is the most unrivalled triumph of

sculpture and architecture that the world ever saw. The delight which it

inspires on a superficial view is heightened in proportion as it is

attentively surveyed. If we admire the whole of the glorious fabric,

that admiration will be augmented by a minute investigation of all the

ramified details. Every part has been finished with such exquisite

purity, that not the smallest instance of negligence can be discovered

in the execution of those particulars, which are the least exposed to

observation: the most concealed minutiæ of the structure having been

perfected, with a sort of pious scrupulosity."

"I pass delicious hours," says M. La Martine, "recumbent beneath the

shade of the Propylæa: my eyes fixed on the falling pediment of the

Parthenon, I feel all antiquity in what it has produced of divine; the

rest is not worth the language that has described it. The aspect of the

Parthenon displays, better than history, the colossal grandeur of a

people. Pericles ought not to die. What superhuman civilization was that

which supplied a great man to command, an architect to conceive, a

sculptor to decorate, statuaries to execute, workmen to cut, a people to

pay, and eyes to comprehend and admire such an edifice! Where shall we

find such a people, or such a period? No where!"

"Let us, in idea, rebuild the Parthenon," continues the same writer; "it

is easily done; it has only lost its frieze, and its internal

compartments. The external walls, chiselled by Phidias, the columns, and

fragments of columns, remain. The Parthenon was entirely built of

Pentelic marble, so called from the neighbouring mountain of that name,

whence it was taken. It consists of a parallelogram, surrounded by a

peristyle of forty-six Doric columns; one column is six feet in diameter

at the base, and thirty-four feet high. The columns are placed on the

pavement of the temple itself, and have no bases. At each extremity of

the temple exists, or did exist, a portico of six columns. The total

length of the edifice is two hundred and twenty-eight feet; its width,

two hundred feet; its height, sixty-six feet. It only presents to the

eye the majestic simplicity of its architectural lines. It was, in fact,

one single idea expressed in stone, and intelligible at a glance, like

the thoughts of the ancients."

This recalls to our recollection what Plutarch says in respect to

Pericles. "The Parthenon was constructed with such admirable judgment,

such solidity of workmanship, and such a profound knowledge of the

architectural art, that it would have indefinitely defied the ravages of

time, if they had not been assisted by the operations of external

violence. It is an edifice that seems to have been constructed for

eternity. The structures which Pericles raised are the more admirable,

as, being completed in so short a time, they yet had such a lasting

beauty; for, as they had, when new, the venerable aspect of antiquity,

so, now they are old, they have the freshness of a modern work. They

seem to be preserved from the injuries of time by a kind of vital

principle, which produces a vigour that cannot be impaired, and a bloom

that will never fade."

These words of Plutarch were applicable to the Parthenon little more

than a century ago, and would still have been so, if it had not found

enemies in the successive bigotry of contending religions, in the

destruction of war, and the plundering mania of artists and amateurs.

The high preservation of those parts, which are still suffered to

remain, is truly astonishing! The columns are so little broken, that

were it not for the venerable reality of age, they would almost appear

of recent construction.

These observations naturally carry us back to the period in which the

Parthenon was built. That which was the chief delight of the Athenians,

and the wonder of strangers, was the magnificence of their edifices; yet

no part of the conduct of Pericles moved the spleen of his adversaries

more than this. They insisted that he had brought the greatest disgrace

upon the Athenians, by removing the treasures of Greece from Delos, and

taking them into his own custody; that he had not left himself even the

specious apology of having caused the money to be brought to Athens for

its greater security, and to keep it from being seized by the

Barbarians; that Greece would consider such an attempt as a manifest

tyranny; that the sums they had received from them, upon pretence of

their being employed in the war, were laid out by the Athenians in

gilding and embellishing their city, in making magnificent statues, and

raising temples that cost millions. Nor did they amplify in the matter;

for the Parthenon alone cost £145,000. Pericles,[84] on the contrary,

remonstrated to the Athenians, that they were not obliged to give the

allies an account of the money they had received; that it was enough

they defended them from the Barbarians, whilst the allies furnished

neither soldiers, horses, nor ships. He added, that as the Athenians

were sufficiently provided with all things necessary for war, it was but

just that they should employ the rest of their riches in edifices and

other works, which, when finished, would give immortal glory to their

city, and the whole time they were carrying on give bread to an infinite

number of citizens: that they themselves had all kinds of materials, as

timber, stone, brass, ivory, gold, ebony, and cypress wood; and all

sorts of artificers capable of working them, as carpenters, masons,

smiths, stone-cutters, dyers, goldsmiths; artificers in ebony, painters,

embroiderers, and turners; men fit to conduct their naval affairs, as

merchants, sailors, and experienced pilots; others for land carriage, as

cartwrights, waggoners, carters, rope-makers, paviors, &c. &c.: that it

was for the advantage of the state to employ these different artificers

and workmen, who, as so many separate bodies, formed, when united, a

kind of peaceable and domestic army, whose different functions and

employments diffused gain and increase throughout all ages and sexes:

lastly, that, whilst men of robust bodies, and of an age fit to bear

arms, whether soldiers or mariners, and those who were in the different

garrisons, were supported with the public moneys, it was but just that

the rest of the people who lived in the city should also be maintained

in their way: and that as all were members of the same republic, they

should all reap the same advantages, by doing it services, which, though

of a different kind, did, however, all contribute to its security or

ornament. One day as the debaters were growing warm, Pericles offered to

defray the expense of all these things, provided it should be declared

in the public inscriptions, that he only had been at the charge of them.

At these words, the people, either admiring his magnanimity, or fired

with emulation, and determined not to let him engross that glory, cried,

with one voice, that he might take out of the public treasury all the

sums that were necessary for his purpose.

Historians expatiate greatly on the magnificent edifices and other

works; but it is not easy to say whether the complaints and murmurs

raised against him were ill-founded or not. According to Cicero, such

edifices and other works only are worthy of admiration as are of use to

the public, as aqueducts, city walls, citadels, arsenals, sea-ports; and

to these must be added the work, made by Pericles, to join Athens to the

port of Piræus.

Mons. de La Martine speaks of the only two figures that now adorn the

Parthenon thus:--"At the Parthenon there remain only the two figures of

Mars and Venus, half crushed by two enormous fragments of cornice,

which have glided over their heads; but these two figures are to me

worth more than all I have seen in sculpture in my life. They live as no

other canvas or marble has ever lived. One feels that the chisel of

Phidias trembled, burned in his hand, when these sublime figures started

into being under his fingers."

The following observations in regard to colour are by Mr.

Williams:--"The Parthenon, in its present corroded state, impresses the

mind with the idea of its thousands of years. The purity of marble has

disappeared; but still the eye is charmed with the varied livery of

time. The western front is rich in golden hues, and seems as if it had

absorbed the evening beams[85]; little white appears, except the

tympanum and part of the entablature. But the brightest orange colour,

and grey and sulphury hues, combine in sweetest harmony. The noble

shafts of the huge columns are uniformly toned with yellow, of a

brownish cast, admitting here and there a little grey. Casting the eye

to the inner cell, we see dark hues of olive mixed with various tints,

adorning the existing frieze and pillars; and these, opposed to

brilliant white, afford a point and power of expression, which never

fails to please."

Sir J. C. Hobhouse says, Lord Elgin's injuries were these; the taking

off the metopes, the statue over the theatre of Bacchus, and the statues

of the west pediment of the Parthenon; and the carrying away one of the

Caryatides, and the finest of the columns of the Erectheum. "No other,"

continues Sir John, "comes, I believe, within the limits of censure--no

other marbles were detached."

The monuments, now called the Elgin marbles, were chiefly obtained from

the Erectheum, the Propylæa, and the Parthenon, more especially the

last. We must here give room to the observations, vindicative of this

proceeding:--"Perhaps one of the most judicious measures of government,

with reference to the advancement of the arts in this country, was the

purchase of these remains. We may go farther, and add, that the removal

of them from Athens, where their destruction was daily going forward, to

place them where their merits would be appreciated, and their decay

suspended, was not only a justifiable act, but one which deserves the

gratitude of England and of the civilised world. The decay of the

Athenian monuments may be attributed to various causes. 'Fire and the

barbarian' have both done their work. Athens has seen many masters. The

Romans were too refined to destroy the monuments of art: but the Goths

had a long period of spoliation; and then came the Turks, at once proud

and ignorant, despising what they could not understand. The Acropolis

became a garrison in their hands, and thus, in 1687, it was bombarded by

the Venetians, whose heavy guns were directed against the porticoes and

colonnades of the ancient temples. But the Turks still continued to hold

their conquests; and the business of demolition went steadily on for

another century and a half. Many travellers who visited Athens about a

hundred years ago, and even much later, describe monuments of sculpture

which now have no existence. The Turks pounded the marble into dust to

make lime; one traveller after another continued to remove a fragment.

The museums of Egypt were successively adorned with these relics; at

last, when, as column after column fell, the remains of Athens were

becoming less and less worthy of notice, covered in the dust, or carted

away to be broken up for building, Lord Elgin, who had been ambassador

at Constantinople in 1799, obtained, in 1801, an authority from the

Turkish government, called a firmaun, which eventually enabled the

British nation to possess the most valuable of the sculptures of which

any portion was left. The authority thus granted empowered Lord Elgin to

fix scaffolding around the ancient temple of the Idols 'to mould the

ornamental and visible figures thereon in plaster and gypsum;' and,

subsequently, 'to take away any pieces of stone with old inscriptions or

figures thereon.' For several years the intentions of Lord Elgin were

carried into effect at his private risk, and at a cost which is stated

to have amounted to 74,000_l_, including the interest of money. In 1816,

the entire collection was purchased of Lord Elgin by act of parliament

for 35,000_l._ It is unnecessary for us to go into the controversy,

whether it was just to remove these relics from their original seats.

Had the Greeks been able to preserve them, there can be no doubt of the

injustice of such an act. The probability is, that if foreign

governments had not done what Lord Elgin did as an individual, there

would not have been a fragment left at this day to exhibit the grandeur

of the Grecian art as practised by Phidias. The British nation, by the

purchase of these monuments, has secured a possession of inestimable

value[86]."

From these observations, it would appear that the spoliation of the

Parthenon may be vindicated on the ground, that neither the Turks nor

the citizens cared any thing about them, and that if they had not been

taken away, they would, in a short time, have been destroyed.

Respectable testimony, however, is opposed to this: most travellers have

inveighed against the spoliation; and two, highly qualified, have given

a very different account from what the above statement implies. These

are Dr. Clarke and Mr. Dodwell. We shall select the testimony of the

latter in preference to that of Dr. Clarke, only because he was at

Athens at the very time in which the spoliation was going on. "During my

first tour to Greece," says he, "I had the inexpressible mortification

of being present when the Parthenon was despoiled of its finest

sculpture, and when some of its architectural members were thrown to the

ground." * * * "It is, indeed, impossible to suppress the feelings of

regret which must arise in the breast of every traveller, who has seen

these temples before and since their late dilapidation! Nor have I any

hesitation in declaring, that the Athenians in general, nay, even the

Turks themselves, did lament the ruin that was committed; and loudly and

openly blamed their sovereign for the permission he had granted! I was

on the spot at the time, and had an opportunity of observing, and,

indeed, of participating, in the sentiment of indignation, which such

conduct universally inspired. The whole proceeding was so unpopular in

Athens, that it was necessary to pay the labourers more than their usual

profits, before any one could be prevailed upon to assist in this work

of profanation."

"Such rapacity is a crime against all ages and all generations," says

Mr. Eustace; "it deprives the past of the trophies of their genius and

the title-deeds of their fame; the present of the strongest inducements

to exertion, the noblest exhibitions that curiosity can contemplate; and

the future of the master-pieces of art, the models of imitation. To

guard against the repetition of such depredations is the wish of every

man of genius, the duty of every man in power, and the common interest

of every civilised nation."

"That the Elgin marbles will contribute to the improvement of art in

England," says Mr. Williams, "cannot be doubted. They must, certainly,

open the eyes of the British artists, and prove that the true and only

road to simplicity and beauty is the study of nature. But had we a right

to diminish the interest of Athens for selfish motives, and prevent

successive generations of other nations from seeing those admirable

structures? The temple of Minerva was spared as a beacon to the world,

to direct it to the knowledge of purity and of taste. What can we say to

the disappointed traveller, who is now deprived of the rich satisfaction

that would have compensated his travel and his toil? It will be little

consolation to him to say, he may find the sculpture of the Parthenon in

England[87]."