Briau,[41] in his psychiatric study, emphasized

the innocuousness of peyote.... No signs of grave intolerance

were ever exhibited, nor any accident more disagreeable than

vomiting, all too frequent at the beginning of a treatment

with opiates. There was no notable organic upsetment produced

during the time of action of the medicament. The effects on

the circulation, respiration, digestive system and excretory

functions have not appeared noxious. We have frequently

examined urine for the existence of abnormal constituents

revealing some derangement of the liver or the kidneys. In

short, never during our researches have distressing secondary

phenomena been manifested (headache, obnubilation, confusion,

psychic and physical depression, or gastro-intestinal

disturbances).... No brutality in the action [of pan-peyotl]

can be remarked.

Briau believes the drug non-habit forming. Rouhier expresses himself more

guardedly:

That peyote-mania can sometimes exist, we will not dispute.

We merely remark, to explain our optimism on the subject,

that the drug does not seem to provoke that irresistible

physiological appetite, nor that “state of need,” purveyors of

the great toxicomanias which opium, cocaine, heroine or alcohol

create.

Havelock Ellis expresses himself as follows:

The few observations recorded in America and my own experiments

in England do not enable us to say anything regarding the

habitual consumption of mescal in large amounts. That such

consumption would be gravely injurious I cannot doubt. Its

safeguard seems to lie in the fact that a certain degree of

robust health is required to obtain any real enjoyment from its

visionary gifts.

The peyote cult · 第 83 / 100 题