THE SYSTEM OF THEOCRATIC EDUCATION.

§ 227. The system of National Education founded its first stage on the

substantial basis of the family-spirit; its second stage on the division

of the nation by means of division of labor which it makes permanent in

castes; its third stage presents the free opposition of the laity and

clergy; in its next phase it makes war, immortality, and trade, by

turns, its end; thirdly, it posits beauty, patriotic youth, and the

immediateness of individuality, as the essence of mankind, and at last

dissolves the unity of nationality in the consciousness that all nations

are really one since they are all human beings. In the intermixture of

races in the Roman world arises the conception of the human race, the

_genus humanum_. Education had become eclectic: the Roman legions

levelled the national distinctions. In the wavering of all objective

morality, the necessity of self-education in order to the formation of

character appeared ever more and more clearly; but the conception, which

lay at the foundation, was always, nevertheless, that of Roman, Greek,

or German education. But in the midst of these nations another system

had striven for development, and this did not base itself on the natural

connection of nationality, but made this, for the first time, only a

secondary thing, and made the direct relation of man to God its chief

idea. In this system God himself is the teacher. He manifests to man His

will as law, to which he must unconditionally conform for no other

reason than that He is the Lord, and man His servant, who can have no

other will than His. The obedience of man is therefore, in this system,

abstract until through experience he gradually attains to the knowledge

that the will of God has in it the very essence of his own will.

Descent, Talent, Events, Work, Beauty, Courage,--all these are

indifferent things compared with the subjection of the human to the

divine will. To be well-pleasing to God is almost the same as belief in

Him. Without this identity, what is natural in national descent is of no

value. According to its form of manifestation, Judaism is below the

Greek spirit. It is not beautiful, but rather grotesque. But in its

essence, as the religion of the contradiction between the idea and its

existence, it goes beyond nature, which it perceives to be established

by an absolute, conscious, and reasonable Will; while the Greek

concealed from himself only mythically his dependence on nature, on his

mother-earth. The Jews have been preserved in the midst of all other

culture by the elastic power of the thought of God as One who was free

from the control of nature. The Jews have a patriotism in common with

the Romans. The Maccabees, for example, were not inferior to the Romans

in greatness.

--Abraham is the genuine Jew because he is the genuinely faithful man.

He does not hesitate to obey the horrible and inhuman command of his

God. Circumcision was made the token of the national unity, but the

nation may assimilate members to itself from other nations through this

rite. The condition always lies in belief in a spiritual relation to

which the relation of nationality is secondary. The Jewish nation makes

proselytes, and these are widely different from the _Socii_ of the

Romans or the _Metoeci_ of the Athenians.--

§ 228. To the man who knows Nature to be the work of a single,

incomparable, rational Creator, she loses independence. He is negatively

freed from her control, and sees in her only an absolute means. As

opposed to the fanciful sensuous intuitions of Ethnicism, this seems to

be a backward step, but for the emancipation of man it is a progress. He

no longer fears Nature but her Lord, and admires Him so much that prose

rises to the dignity of poetry in his telological contemplation. Since

man stands over and beyond nature, education is directed to morality as

such, and spreads itself out in innumerable limitations, by means of

which the distinction of man from nature is expressly asserted as a

difference. The ceremonial law appears often arbitrary, but in its

prescriptions it gives man the satisfaction of placing himself as will

in relation to will. For example, if he is forbidden to eat any

specified part of an animal, the ground of this command is not merely

natural--it is the will of the Deity. Man learns therefore, in his

obedience to such directions, to free himself from his self-will, from

his natural desires. This exact outward conformity to subjectivity is

the beginning of wisdom, the purification of the will from all

individual egotism.

--The rational substance of the Law is found always in the Decalogue.

Many of our modern much-admired authors exhibit a superficiality

bordering on shallowness when they comment alone on the absurdity of the

miracles, and abstract from the profound depth of the moral struggle,

and from the practical rationality of the ten commandments.--

§ 229. Education in this theocratical system is on one side patriarchal.

The Family is very prominent, because it is considered to be a great

happiness for the individual to belong from his very earliest life to

the company of those who believe in the true God. On its other side it

is hierarchical, as its ceremonial law develops a special office, which

is to see that obedience is paid to its multifarious regulations. And,

because these are often perfectly arbitrary, Education must, above all,

practise the memory in learning them all, so that they may always be

remembered. The Jewish monotheism shares this necessity with the

superstition of ethnicism.

§ 230. But the technique proper of the mechanism is not the most

important pedagogical element of the theocracy. We find this in its

historical significance, since its history throughout has a pedagogical

character. For the people of God show us always, in their changing

intercourse with their God, a progress from the external to the

internal, from the lower to the higher, from the past to the future. Its

history, therefore, abounds in situations very interesting in a

pedagogical point of view, and in characters which are eternal models.

§ 231. (1) The will of God as the absolute authority is at first to

them, as law, external. But soon God adds to the command to obedience,

on one hand, the inducement of a promise of material prosperity, and on

the other hand the threat of material punishment. The fulfilment of the

law is also encouraged by reflection on the profit which it brings. But,

since these motives are all external, they rise finally into the insight

that the law is to be fulfilled, not on their account, but because it is

the will of the Lord; not alone because it is conducive to our

happiness, but also because it is in itself holy, and written in our

hearts: in other words, man proceeds from the abstract legality, through

the reflection of eudæmonism, to the internality of moral sentiment--the

course of all education.

--This last stand-point is especially represented in the excellent

Gnomic of Jesus Sirach--a book so rich in pedagogical insight, which

paints with master-strokes the relations of husband and wife, parents

and children, master and servants, friend and friend, enemy and enemy,

and the dignity of labor as well as the necessity of its division. This

priceless book forms a side-piece from the theocratic stand-point to the

_Republic_ of Plato and his laws on ethical government.--

§ 232. (2) The progress from the lower to the higher appeared in the

conquering of the natural individuality. Man, as the servant of Jehovah,

must have no will of his own; but selfish naturalness arrayed itself so

much the more vigorously against the abstract "Thou shalt," allowed

itself to descend into an abstraction from the Law, and often reached

the most unbridled extravagance. But since the Law in inexorable might

always remained the same, always persistent, in distinction from the

inequalities of the deed of man, it forced him to come back to it, and

to conform himself to its demands. Thus he learned criticism, thus he

rose from naturalness into spirit. This progress is at the same time a

progress from necessity to freedom, because criticism always gradually

opens a way for man into insight, so that he finds the will of God to be

the truth of his own self-determination. Because God is one and

absolute, there arises the expectation that His Will will become the

basis for the will of all nations and men. The criticism of the

understanding must recognize a contradiction in the fact that the will

of the true God is the law of only one nation; feared by other nations,

moreover, by reason of their very worship of God as a gloomy mystery,

and detested as _odium generis humani_. And thus is developed the

thought that the isolation of the believers will come to an end as soon

as the other nations recognize their faith as the true one, and are

received into it. Thus here, out of the deepest penetration of the soul

into itself, as among the Romans out of the fusion of nations, we see

appear the idea of the human race.

§ 233. (3) The progress from the past to the future unfolded the ideal

servant of God who fulfils all the Law, and so blots out the empirical

contradiction that the "Thou shalt" of the Law attains no adequate

actuality. This Prince of Peace, who shall gather all nations under his

banner, can therefore have no other thing predicated of him than

Holiness. He is not beautiful as the Greeks represented their ideal, not

brave and practical as was the venerated _Virtus_ of the Romans; he does

not place an infinite value on his individuality as the German does: but

he is represented as insignificant in appearance, as patient, as humble,

as he who, in order to reconcile the world, takes upon himself the

infirmities and disgrace of all others. The ethnical nations have only a

lost Paradise behind them; the Jews have one also before them. From this

belief in the Messiah who is to come, from the certainty which they have

of conquering with him, from the power of esteeming all things of small

importance in view of such a future, springs the indestructible nature

of the Jews. They ignore the fact that Christianity is the necessary

result of their own history. As the nation that is to be (_des

Seinsollens_), they are merely a historical nation, the nation among

nations, whose education--whenever the Jew has not changed and corrupted

its nature through modern culture--is still always patriarchal,

hierarchal, and mnemonic.

Pedagogics as a System · 第 53 / 82 题