CHAPTER VII.

The Rev. Rowland Ingram, B.D.

On the death of William Paley the Governors at once began the task of

finding a successor. They inserted in the newspapers an advertisement to

the effect that a vacancy had occurred and that candidates would be

examined by the Archbishop of York in Classics, Mathematics, "or any

other Branch of Literature, his Grace may think proper." The salary was

to be from £100--£300 but no house was provided.

There was a very strong field of applicants. A Fellow of Trinity,

Cambridge, Thomas Carr, founder's kin--a Fellow of Hertford--a Fellow of

Queen's, Oxford--a Fellow of Sidney Sussex, Cambridge--Headmasters of

various Grammar Schools, were all candidates. One Isaac Cook--Headmaster

of Ripon--explained as shewing the high value of his Classical

attainments that when he was elected to Ripon he was examined "with

another candidate in Terence, Cicero, Tacitus, the Greek Testament and

Demosthenes, and wrote a Latin Dissertation."

The Archbishop declined the honour of examining the candidates, but

later recommended that they should appoint to the Mastership his

brother--John Sheepshanks--as one eminently suitable. The Headmaster of

Eton was then asked to undertake the examination and was offered "such

pecuniary or other compliment" as he might wish. As he did not even

answer their letter, they wrote to the Rev. W. Stevens, Headmaster of

Sedbergh, who undertook the duty.

[Illustration: REV. ROWLAND INGRAM, M.A.]

In the result the Rev. Rowland Ingram was elected. He had gained "one of

the first Mathematical honours" and had only just failed to win the

Bachelor of Arts Classical Medal. He was a B.D. and a late Fellow and

Tutor of Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge. He was turned thirty-two (his

brother said he was thirty-four) and after being for some years a

private Tutor at Eton had been appointed in Midsummer, 1798, Headmaster

of Ipswich Grammar School, where he had made a considerable name. He was

certainly the strongest candidate who applied and it speaks well for the

Governors that they elected him, notwithstanding the fact that two old

Giggleswick boys were standing--Thomas Carr and the Rev. Thomas Paley,

the former of whom had a very distinguished academic career, and Paley

had been third Wrangler. Ingram began with a salary of £300 a year and

within six months premises were bought from Mr. Geo. Robinson, on which

it was determined to build him a house.

Troubles arose on the staff almost immediately. John Carr who had

succeeded Robert Kidd at £80 a year declared in June, 1800, that he

would not continue to teach under £100. His request was not complied

with, but the Governors made a compromise. They told him that he must

give reasonable notice before he left the School, but that as his

department consisted of a great number of boys and it was impossible for

him to pay proper attention to them all, they had decided to hire an

Assistant. At the same time they required that "teaching the English

Grammar be encouraged."

The recent and rapid growth of the Writing Department is very

significant. Its growth and the importance laid upon it increased step

by step with the Industrial Revolution. It gave an elementary education

and was confined to practical subjects--Arithmetic, Mensuration,

Merchants' Accounts, etc. Some confusion existed in men's minds about

the primary object of a Grammar School. Giggleswick had not been founded

to give elementary instruction but its duty was to impart a sound

knowledge of the Classics, in order to enable its pupils to go up to the

University with a Scholarship and thence enter one of the learned

professions and preferably become a Priest. The boys were welcomed from

whatever homes they came, and though leaving Scholarships were given

with a preference to the poorer boy, everyone received an education in

the higher branches of literature. Not until 1768 was there any mention

of the necessity of promoting the study of elementary subjects. It is

true that the Statutes of 1592 had provided for a Scrivener to teach

writing but he was only to come for three weeks in the year. In 1768 the

Archbishop of York desired that a more permanent teacher should be

chosen and the appointments of Saul, Stancliffe, Kidd, which have

already been noticed, and of John Carr, of Beverley, were the result.

With the nineteenth century the School rapidly developed in importance.

Kidd had in 1798 been paid £70 a year, Carr in the following March

received £80 and clamoured for £100. In 1801 owing to the increase of

numbers the son of Mrs. Mary Bradley acted as his Assistant for a few

months and later in the year Carr engaged his own son, whom the

Governors allowed to remain, until a permanent Assistant was appointed.

The Governors passed and re-passed resolutions on the question of

providing a permanent teacher and Mr. Clementson was appointed in 1805

and taught the boys in a house built by the Governors but lately used as

a school by Mr. Holmes. The proper School was possibly growing too large

and in 1804, the Archbishop had suggested that English should be taught

in a distinct department. The teaching of English grammatically was an

innovation and a natural response to the needs of the time. Earlier ages

had thought that in order to get a thorough grasp of English it was

first necessary to pass through the portals of the Classics but the

get-educated-quick had no time for such methods. Clementson was paid £50

and, when he demanded an increase, was graciously allowed an additional

£20 "so long as his servitude shall be agreeable to the parties."

For a brief period of seven weeks in 1806 William Stackhouse worked

under Carr at the rate of £30--Clementson having left--and Carr resigned

in January, 1807. In that month he received a last payment of £5 5_s._,

as a reward for examining candidates for the vacant post. One of them,

John Lockwood, was elected but he was required to teach not only Writing

and Arithmetic but also Mathematics. He rejected the offer and

Stackhouse was appointed permanently at £100 a year. In 1809 he received

£150 and continued at this salary till his death or resignation in 1830.

In his appointment English, as a teaching subject, was neglected, but

later in the same year the Archbishop was approached on the propriety of

establishing an English School and in 1809 a minute of the Governors

declared that none were to be admitted into the Writing School, unless

they were able to read and were under eighteen. This points to an entire

cleavage between the Grammar and the Writing School. They were in

different parts of the building and a member of the one was not of

necessity a member of the other. They were both subsisting on the same

foundation, but the Writing School was an off-shoot, a child and an

illegitimate one. Not until the middle of the century did the old School

shake it off and return to the primary objects of its foundation.

Obadiah Clayton, the Usher, began in June, 1800, to shew signs of

insanity. The particular form that it took was the habit of producing

pistols in School. He was put for a time in an asylum and a Mr.

Tomlinson was to be written to as a successor, but as they did not hear

from the Archbishop to whom they had applied for instructions, nothing

was done. Later Clayton returned from the asylum but possibly for a time

took no part in the School work. In 1802 the Governors went to the

expense of 5_s._ 4_d._ in order to get advice on the propriety of

complying with his request that he should attend a private pupil during

school hours and should be allowed to take the globes from the School.

His request was negatived.

Two years later, matters reached a head, his conduct was not considered

consistent and the Archbishop suggested that they should pay him the

statutory minimum of £50 and hire an Assistant. The difficulty lay in

the fact that he held a freehold and could only with great difficulty

be made to resign. Meanwhile, Carr and Ingram were requested to report

upon his conduct. Ingram declared that Clayton's conversation was of a

wild and incoherent nature, but Carr was more minute. He reported that

Clayton did not attend the School much for three weeks and that during

that time he appeared to be in a deranged state of mind and made use of

expressions such as that he had got a letter from his wife in heaven, or

that the roads on which he walked were paved with fire. Although the

immediate cause of his mental derangement was the death of his wife, he

had never enjoyed good health. One of his testimonials from the Tutor of

Magdalene College, Cambridge, had said that he had been compelled to

leave Magdalene temporarily owing to ill health. He continued however to

teach until 1805, when at his own suggestion he was allowed to absent

himself for four years without giving up his license and he received £50

a year. This permission was characterized by the Archbishop as an act of

humanity, but the legality of thus disposing of the Trust money was

seriously questioned. A year later the Governors received a letter from

him, saying that he had had many difficulties and had visited many parts

of England but his "_dernier resort_" was at Bognor Barracks where he

had enlisted as a private soldier and was anxious to be bought out. Some

neighbouring clergy had interested themselves in his case and the

Bishop of Chichester was willing to provide him with a curacy, provided

that satisfactory answers came from the Governors of Giggleswick.

Clayton begged them therefore to say that the cause of his leaving the

School had been "ill-health." He was released from the Army but probably

did not serve any curacy, for in May, 1808, he was acting as a Chaplain

in the Royal Navy, after which nothing more is known of him though he

continued to be paid his salary till 1810. His position as Usher was

filled in that year by John Armstrong, who had been elected as a

Classical Assistant in 1806; the Governors at that time had proposed to

offer £50 as a fit salary, but as no candidate had appeared on the day

of election, it was raised to £100.

Ingram was an energetic man at the beginning of his Headmastership and

supported by an able Governing Body and a growing revenue, he had wished

to enlarge the numbers of the School and to increase its efficiency.

Advertisements had been put in the Leeds, London, and Liverpool papers

"for the encouragement of the School," money had been annually

distributed among the Scholars to create emulation, the English

Department had been strengthened and it had been decided to teach

English grammatically. Books had been bought more lavishly than ever

before, and also globes celestial and terrestrial, as they were

"considered to be of great use in every department of the School."

The numbers of the School increased sometimes to such an extent that

four masters had to be engaged but this was never more than a temporary

expedient. The Charity Commissioners issued a report in 1825 dealing

with the School, in which they gave the numbers of the School as

sixty-three, of whom twenty-three were taught by the Master and forty by

the Usher. It gave no record of the number in the English Department.

These boys had a feeling of distinct hostility against the Grammar

School boys. They were of a less wealthy class, they lived in the

neighbourhood and they were receiving the priceless boon of a practical

and elementary education. The Grammar School boys on the other hand were

not all natives of the place. About twenty-one came from the Parish, ten

were members of families who had come to reside there, and the rest were

wholly strangers. They were compelled to learn Writing and Mathematics,

which they did not consider liberal sciences, and they had to use the

same door of entrance and exit as their enemies. This hostility

developed into open strife and partly accounts for the continual glazing

bills that the Governors had to meet. From 1783-1792 they had been

fairly constant amounting to about a pound a year, but in 1803 5_s._

reward was offered to anyone giving information about persons breaking

School windows, and in 1834 the bill was over £7. It was a very

difficult position. The Report of 1825 recommended that the elementary

education should be continued but if possible in another building

because it supplied a certain need and, if discontinued, would arouse an

even greater hostility in the locality. At the same time it distinctly

recognized that such endowment was probably illegal.

It has already been noticed that the revenues of the School were

expanding. In 1802 the Governors received over £800 from the North Cave

Estate, which five years later was valued at £1,287 but was not let at

this valuation. At the time of the Report of 1825 the rental was

considered to be about £1,140. The Exhibition Fund had also risen from

£26 in 1801 to £37 15_s._ in 1821, and twice it reached £40. The money

at this period was given as a rule to one person for four years and at

the end of that period as re-assigned. There was no examination, the boy

or his father applied to the Governors and the claimant could receive

it, even if he had already been three years resident in the University.

The increased income had been obtained by the purchase of Government

Stock. Between 1810 and 1814 Navy five per cents. were bought to the

extent of £1,190, and in addition to this the Governors had paid off the

debt of £1,120, which had been incurred owing to the enclosure of

Walling Fen. They were paying Ingram £510 a year, John Howson, M.A., who

had been a former pupil of Paley and had become Usher on John

Armstrong's death in 1814, received £205; and William Stackhouse £150.

They had built a house for the Headmaster and had repaired one for the

Usher.

All boys were admitted into the School for whom there was room, but they

now had to bring a certificate of good character for the previous year.

The boarders lodged with the Usher and with people in the neighbourhood,

notably one John King and Mrs. Craggs. These boys paid boarding fees.

When the Governors issued an advertisement for a Writing Master in 1792

they gave the salary as £30 but "as much more can be made by

quarterage." Is it possible that quarterage can mean taking boarders? It

is not certain whether Ingram took boarders, but he probably did. His

house was built gradually. Although the land was bought in 1800, the

mode of a building for Master, Usher and Assistant was still being

discussed in 1802. In October of the same year John Nicholson was

commissioned to erect it at a cost of £700. It was finished in 1804, and

Nicholson undertook to repair a house for the accommodation of the Usher

or Assistant at a cost of £250.

[Illustration: USHER'S HOUSE.]

[Illustration: CRAVEN BANK.]

Carr, the Writing Master, was complaining bitterly of the "numberless

inconveniences" he had suffered, and in January, 1805, was looking

forward to living at last in a good house, though he was not quite sure

whether he would "live to enjoy it." But by March he had not got into it

and working himself up into a fit state of indignation delivered himself

of the following letter to Thomas Paley, one of the Governors:

Sir,

I am very poorly with a cold I have taken by lying in a damp

bed, I thought last night I must have called somebody to my

assistance, I have with difficulty got thro' the fatigues of the

day.

Surely when Nicholson undertook the house, he had not permission

to defer the completing of it _ad libitum_. It was first thought

it would have been done six weeks before Christmas. Mr. N. has

now converted the house into a workshop for the convenience of

his people to carry on the repairs that are to be done to the

dog-kennel: in order to make it habitable for some of Mr.

Armistead's people: and the plasterer has also been absent for

the last two days, I suppose, employed by Mr. N. at Astick. If I

had any tolerable convenience it would be quite another thing;

but I have never had a comfortable place to lie down in since I

have been at Giggleswick, tho' I have been a slave to the

business of the School, and stood much in need of undisturbed

and comfortable rest. I am indeed sorry to trouble you so often,

but not only my happiness, but my life is at stake: and I would

rather leave Giggleswick immediately than go on so any longer.

I remain, Sir,

Yours etc.,

J. CARR.

Monday, P.M.

P.S.--Mr. Ingram could have done a little longer without a

scullery, as well as I can do (if I ever go to it) without a

garden wall and a necessary.

He did not stay many years longer but resigned in 1807. Ingram's house

was known as Craven Bank and in 1829 he added a stable at the cost of

£60. Howson also was having money spent upon his house. In 1817 he had a

new kitchen built at the cost of £100 and seven years later he received

£120 to repair his house, while his salary had already been increased £5

yearly to meet the cost of alterations and repairs.

The closing years of Rowland Ingram's time were not bearing the fruit

that the first decade had promised. But the School turned out at least

one good Scholar--John Saul Howson--a son of the Usher. Born in 1816 he

went up to Trinity College, Cambridge, in 1833, at the age of seventeen.

He won a Scholarship there and also received money from the Tennant

Exhibition Fund. He took some University prizes, and a first class in

both Classics and Mathematics. As Head of Liverpool College for ten

years he did a great educational work, by releasing it from debt and

reforming its system. Later he was appointed Dean of Chester where

eventually he died. As a Churchman he was a notable figure and as a

Christian he will be remembered long.

On the whole the teaching in later years was not efficient. J. S. Howson

relates how before he was eight years old he had said the Latin Grammar

through four times without understanding a word of it. This was a

remarkable achievement but not adequate evidence of supreme genius in

the teacher. Education, like most other things, was everywhere at its

nadir, and Giggleswick was no exception. In the whole of Ingram's time

as Headmaster--43 years--he had three Ushers. One was mad, one died

after four years, and one--John Howson--grew grey-headed with the work.

He had during the same period three Writing Masters, of whom one was

most cantankerous, another stayed twenty-four years, and the third--John

Langhorne--was not wholly a success. He managed the School Accounts from

1839-1845, but they were found to be "so inaccurate and confused" that

Mr. Robinson had to enter them in the book afresh.

The constancy of a staff which from 1814-1831 never varied, and of whom

two were local men, contributed to the depression of the School. Another

contributory cause lay in the constitution of the Governing Body. During

the last decade of the eighteenth century and the first decade of the

next the Governors showed themselves very diligent in the pursuit of the

School's welfare. But as time went on, the increasing revenues created

an increasing thirst for more. The Accounts dealt less and less with

things appertaining to the School, more and more with the management of

the North Cave Estate. Between the years 1810 and 1843 there were not

more than two meetings of the Governors, the minutes of which refer to

the conduct of the School; instead they refer constantly to the growing

balance in the Bank (in 1817 it was over £1,500) and they dissipated it

by gratuities equivalent to half a year's salary to the several Masters

and in profuse expenditure in building and repairs. There was but one

man among them who had known the days when £350 was all they had a year,

and only a tumbledown school to teach in. John Clapham must have looked

back with mixed feelings as he regarded the energy, the efficiency, and

the swelling numbers of that early part of the century and compared them

with later years.

There was one more change of importance in this time. The Potation was

still retained and the cost of the meetings on March 12 grew more and

more. The Governors came to dine but they remained to sup. In 1784

fifteen sat down to a dinner, costing 1_s._ a head, they had eight

bottles of Wine, 12_s._ 6_d._ worth of Punch, and Ale 4_s._ 6_d._ In

1802 ten had dinner at 2_s._ 6_d._ a head, nine had supper. They drank

fourteen bottles of Wine, on Rum and Brandy they spent 15_s._ 6_d._, and

on Ale 4_s._ 6_d._ Similar meetings took place each year. There was also

a change in the boys' share. They probably--there is not always a

record--had Figs and Bread given them every year but, sometimes Ale was

also provided. In 1802 they had 5_s._ 6_d._ worth, and in 1807 they had

some but it cannot be asserted that they always had it and between 1807

and 1825 the practice completely dropped and has never been revived.

Rowland Ingram--old Rowland, as the boys called him--was growing old,

and in 1844 he retired on a pension. His friends and neighbours

determined to give him some substantial recognition of the esteem with

which they regarded him, and in January, 1845, a committee was formed to

decide its nature. In the end a Portrait was painted, and the surplus

was placed in the hands of the Governors, to be expended on the

foundation of a library, to be attached to the School, or in any other

substantial way, such as would seem to them more likely to be

permanently beneficial to the School.

A History of Giggleswick School from its Foundation, 1499 to 1912 · 第 7 / 13 章