MR. TIBBINS'S NEW-YEAR'S CALL

Mr. Tibbins wishes that his experience in making New-Year's calls may be

made useful as an illustration of the deceitfulness of appearances. He

is one of the gentlemen who do not keep dogs, although he lives in the

country, and who decline social visits to persons who do. Mr. Tibbins

is, however, just and impartial. "My friends," he says, "shall not

complain of any obscurity in my conduct. I simply offer them the

alternative, me or your dog--not both. If your tastes and preferences

are such that you will have large or small animals lying within your

gates, yelping and growling at every person who enters, smelling at

ankles, and producing lively apprehensions which are not in the least

allayed by calling the beast a good fellow, and remarking that he was

never known to bite,--if," says Mr. Tibbins to his friends, "these are

your preferences, we will not quarrel. I respect your idiosyncrasies,

and I beg you to respect mine, while I embrace this occasion to mention

that among the most prominent of mine is an indisposition to have my

ankles smelled at by dogs of any breed or of any size, whether they are

good fellows or not, and an insuperable disgust with the barking of

beasts when I go to make a call. That it is very selfish in you or any

person to subject his friends to such ordeals I do not say; that I leave

entirely to your own judgment, only remarking that although black snakes

and green snakes are not venomous reptiles, and are probably 'good

fellows,' I do not think that those who delight in having them coiling

and gliding about their parlors ought to be vexed with their neighbors

for not calling. The line must be drawn somewhere," says Mr. Tibbins;

"you may not draw it until you come to snakes; I draw it at dogs."

When, therefore, you stroll about the delightful country in his

neighborhood and mark the abodes of the rich and great, and say to him,

"That is a charming place," Mr. Tibbins answers, "Yes, he has dogs; I

never go there." Mr. Tibbins was naturally very much exhilarated by the

hydrophobia excitement last summer, and hoped at one time that the

public feeling might be carefully kindled to a general crusade against

dogs. "I lately read in Mr. Warner's letter from the Nile," he said, "of

an African king who had never seen a horse until Colonel Long came

riding into his capital. Think, oh, my friend, of the happy island

valley of Avillon, where never a dog barked loudly or was ever seen." Of

course so severe a taste as Tibbins's in a world so largely canine

produces inconvenience, as a dislike to butter in a society which holds

to a natural and necessary relation between bread and butter will often

expose the dissenter to difficulty. Such a man, in a crowded and elegant

assembly, who at supper has incautiously bitten a heavily buttered

sandwich, in the midst of a bout of badinage with youth and beauty,

understands the emotion of those who, with Mr. Tibbins, dislike to have

their ankles smelled at by dogs, yet who suddenly, within a neighbor's

grounds and far from help, perceive that a dog is actually engaged in

that office.

But Mr. Tibbins went out merrily upon New-Year's morning, resolved at

least to pay one visit long neglected to a neighbor who had become his

neighbor the summer before, who had given no signs of dogs, and who, as

Tibbins assured himself, was much too sensible a man to allow them about

the house and grounds. Our friend began the day prosperously, finding

everybody cordial and gay, and doing, as he thought, his full share

towards the enlivenment of each call. At last he came to the new

neighbor's, and went humming gayly up the neat plank-walk from the gate,

when, turning briskly around the house--putting it, as it were, between

himself and retreat--he was advancing rapidly towards the front door

when he suddenly stopped, with a sickening sense of betrayal, as it

were, in the house of a friend, for directly before him, within easy

spring, so to speak, lay a large dog upon the door-mat and directly

under the bell. He was asleep, and upon perceiving him Mr. Tibbins, as

if upon tiptoe for silence, reconnoitred the situation. To advance and

ring the bell was simple madness, for the dog would of course awake the

moment a foot struck the step, and in the confusion of sudden awakening

and of close quarters with an intruder he would probably be very

reckless and sanguinary, and not in the least amenable to the "good

fellow" blandishment. Mr. Tibbins, therefore, without moving, looked at

the windows, hoping to see somebody looking out whom he might with

beaming pantomime summon to the door, and so save himself the contact

which seemed to be inevitable. But there was no one looking out, and the

closed windows seemed to him to stare with blank indifference, so that

he says he had had before no idea how cruel windows can be. It then

occurred to him that if he could open communication with the kitchen,

and entice some maid or man to the door without ringing, the difficulty

would disappear, because the maid or man would pacify the dog. But to

reach the kitchen required a lateral movement which would leave the

enemy directly across his line of retreat. Moreover, any movement

whatever exposed Mr. Tibbins to the risk of making a noise, which would

arouse the foe and precipitate the engagement. He therefore maintained

his position, looking hopefully towards the kitchen, but, seeing no one,

he reluctantly held a further counsel with himself.

The obvious heroic course was to step upon the piazza and ring the bell.

But he saw again that it was impossible to touch the bell without

bringing himself close to the dog, who would then, of course, awake and

snap immediately at the nearest object, which would be Tibbins his leg.

And what was the possible use of heroism under such circumstances? He

might as well advance and kick the dog. But was the dog asleep? Was he

not dead? Was he not--why shouldn't he be--a stuffed dog, an old family

favorite, perhaps, now placed upon his familiar resting-place as his

own monument? This thought cleared the prospect for a moment, but

instant gloom shut down again, as Mr. Tibbins saw a slight breathing

motion, and perceived that the beast still lived. One of the advantages,

or misfortunes, of New-Year's Day in the country, according to the point

of view, is the infrequency of visitors. To our friend this infrequency

seemed to be, upon this occasion, a misfortune. Had there only been a

merry group turning the corner at the moment, he would have joyously

joined it, and so long as he could see other legs between himself and

his enemy his soul would have been at rest.

But his position was peculiarly solitary, nor did any other visitor

appear, and Mr. Tibbins remained for some time motionless regarding the

situation. There was no sign of relief. No visitor came to go in, so

none came out. No friendly face shone at the windows, no helping hand

opened the door. At any moment the dog might open his eyes, and, in that

case, he would certainly not be content with a survey of the situation.

Mr. Tibbins, who is no mean classic, remembered Xenophon and various

other great and renowned commanders who retired in good order and not in

the least demoralized, and reflecting that the sage truly defined

prudence as the crown of wisdom, he gently turned and, careful by no

rude noise to disturb the peaceful slumbers of an innocent animal which,

some poets have suggested, might properly share our heaven, he tiptoed

quietly around the house, and rapidly descending the plank-walk, firmly

closed the gate behind him, and felt his heart swelling with gratitude

for a great mercy.

A few days afterwards he met his neighbor, and said to him that he had

designed to call upon him on New-Year's Day, but that he had discovered

a dog in the path, and as he never called where dogs were kept, he had

been compelled to lose the pleasure of a visit. He then told the story

of his attempt, in the midst of which the neighbor broke into the most

prolonged and immoderate laughter, and when Mr. Tibbins had ended, said

to him, "My dear sir, that dog is immemorially old and superannuated,

and he is blind, deaf, and toothless."

"Indeed!" replied Mr. Tibbins. "But he might not have been."

"And yet I will confess," he said to the Easy Chair, later, "that the

incident is a very pretty sermon upon the deceitfulness of appearances,

which I respectfully offer to your acceptance."

From the Easy Chair, Volume 3 · 第 29 / 45 题