CHAPTER III.

The three next emperors, Caligula, Claudius, and Nero, were the last

princes who had any connection by blood [Footnote: And this was entirely

by the female side. The family descent of the first six Cæsars is so

intricate, that it is rarely understood accurately; so that it may be

well to state it briefly. Augustus was grand nephew to Julius Cæsar,

being the son of his sister's daughter. He was also, by adoption, the

_son_ of Julius. He himself had one child only, viz. the infamous Julia,

who was brought him by his second wife Scribonia; and through this

Julia it was that the three princes, who succeeded to Tiberius, claimed

relationship to Augustus. On that emperor's last marriage with Livia, he

adopted the two sons whom she had borne to her divorced husband. These

two noblemen, who stood in no degree of consanguinity whatever to

Augustus, were Tiberius and Drusus. Tiberius left no children; but

Drusus, the younger of the two brothers, by his marriage with the

younger Antonia, (daughter of Mark Anthony,) had the celebrated

Germanicus, and Claudius, (afterwards emperor.) Germanicus, though

adopted by his uncle Tiberius, and destined to the empire, died

prematurely. But, like Banquo, though he wore no crown, he left

descendants who did. For, by his marriage with Agrippina, a daughter of

Julia's by Agrippa, (and therefore grand-daughter of Augustus,) he had

a large family, of whom one son became the Emperor Caligula; and one

of the daughters, Agrippina the younger, by her marriage with a Roman

nobleman, became the mother of the Emperor Nero. Hence it appears that

Tiberius was uncle to Claudius, Claudius was uncle to Caligula, Caligula

was uncle to Nero. But it is observable, that Nero and Caligula stood

in another degree of consanguinity to each other through their

grandmothers, who were both daughters of Mark Anthony the triumvir; for

the elder Antonia married the grandfather of Nero; the younger Antonia

(as we have stated, above) married Drusus, the grandfather of Caligula;

and again, by these two ladies, they were connected not only with

each other, but also with the Julian house, for the two Antonias were

daughters of Mark Anthony by Octavia, sister to Augustus.] with the

Julian house. In Nero, the sixth emperor, expired the last of the

Cæsars, who was such in reality. These three were also the first in

that long line of monsters, who, at different times, under the title of

Cæsars, dishonored humanity more memorably, than was possible, except in

the cases of those (if any such can be named) who have abused the same

enormous powers in times of the same civility, and in defiance of the

same general illumination. But for them it is a fact, than some crimes,

which now stain the page of history, would have been accounted fabulous

dreams of impure romancers, taxing their extravagant imaginations to

create combinations of wickedness more hideous than civilized men would

tolerate, and more unnatural than the human heart could conceive. Let

us, by way of example, take a short chapter from the diabolic life of

Caligula: In what way did he treat his nearest and tenderest female

connections? His mother had been tortured and murdered by another tyrant

almost as fiendish as himself. She was happily removed from his cruelty.

Disdaining, however, to acknowledge any connection with the blood of

so obscure a man as Agrippa, he publicly gave out that his mother was

indeed the daughter of Julia, but by an incestuous commerce with her

father Augustus. His three sisters he debauched. One died, and her

he canonized; the other two he prostituted to the basest of his own

attendants. Of his wives, it would be hard to say whether they were

first sought and won with more circumstances of injury and outrage, or

dismissed with more insult and levity. The one whom he treated best,

and with most profession of love, and who commonly rode by his side,

equipped with spear and shield, to his military inspections and reviews

of the soldiery, though not particularly beautiful, was exhibited to

his friends at banquets in a state of absolute nudity. His motive for

treating her with so much kindness, was probably that she brought him

a daughter; and her he acknowledged as his own child, from the early

brutality with which she attacked the eyes and cheeks of other infants

who were presented to her as play-fellows. Hence it would appear that

he was aware of his own ferocity, and treated it as a jest. The levity,

indeed, which he mingled with his worst and most inhuman acts, and the

slightness of the occasions upon which he delighted to hang his most

memorable atrocities, aggravated their impression at the time, and must

have contributed greatly to sharpen the sword of vengeance. His palace

happened to be contiguous to the circus. Some seats, it seems, were open

indiscriminately to the public; consequently, the only way in which they

could be appropriated, was by taking possession of them as early as the

midnight preceding any great exhibitions. Once, when it happened that

his sleep was disturbed by such an occasion, he sent in soldiers to

eject them; and with orders so rigorous, as it appeared by the event,

that in this singular tumult, twenty Roman knights, and as many mothers

of families, were cudgelled to death upon the spot, to say nothing of

what the reporter calls "innumeram turbam ceteram."

But this is a trifle to another anecdote reported by the same

authority:--On some occasion it happened that a dearth prevailed, either

generally of cattle, or of such cattle as were used for feeding the wild

beasts reserved for the bloody exhibitions of the amphitheatre. Food

could be had, and perhaps at no very exorbitant price, but on terms

somewhat higher than the ordinary market price. A slight excuse served

with Caligula for acts the most monstrous. Instantly repairing to the

public jails, and causing all the prisoners to pass in review before him

(_custodiarum seriem recognoscens_), he pointed to two bald-headed

men, and ordered that the whole file of intermediate persons should be

marched off to the dens of the wild beasts: "Tell them off," said he,

"from the bald man to the bald man." Yet these were prisoners committed,

not for punishment, but trial. Nor, had it been otherwise, were the

charges against them equal, but running through every gradation of

guilt. But the _elogia_ or records of their commitment, he would not so

much as look at. With such inordinate capacities for cruelty, we cannot

wonder that he should in his common conversation have deplored the

tameness and insipidity of his own times and reign, as likely to be

marked by no wide-spreading calamity." Augustus," said he, "was happy;

for in his reign occurred the slaughter of Varus and his legions.

Tiberius was happy; for in his occurred that glorious fall of the great

amphitheatre at Fidenæ. But for me--alas! alas!" And then he would pray

earnestly for fire or slaughter--pestilence or famine. Famine indeed was

to some extent in his own power; and accordingly, as far as his courage

would carry him, he did occasionally try that mode of tragedy upon the

people of Rome, by shutting up the public granaries against them. As

he blended his mirth and a truculent sense of the humorous with his

cruelties, we cannot wonder that he should soon blend his cruelties with

his ordinary festivities, and that his daily banquets would soon become

insipid without them. Hence he required a daily supply of executions in

his own halls and banqueting rooms; nor was a dinner held to be complete

without such a dessert. Artists were sought out who had dexterity and

strength enough to do what Lucan somewhere calls _ensem rotare_, that

is, to cut off a human head with one whirl of the sword. Even this

became insipid, as wanting one main element of misery to the sufferer,

and an indispensable condiment to the jaded palate of the connoisseur,

viz., a lingering duration. As a pleasant variety, therefore, the

tormentors were introduced with their various instruments of torture;

and many a dismal tragedy in that mode of human suffering was conducted

in the sacred presence during the emperor's hours of amiable relaxation.

The result of these horrid indulgences was exactly what we might

suppose, that even such scenes ceased to irritate the languid appetite,

and yet that without them life was not endurable. Jaded and exhausted as

the sense of pleasure had become in Caligula, still it could be roused

into any activity by nothing short of these murderous luxuries. Hence,

it seems, that he was continually tampering and dallying with the

thought of murder; and like the old Parisian jeweller Cardillac, in

Louis XIV.'s time, who was stung with a perpetual lust for murdering the

possessors of fine diamonds--not so much for the value of the prize (of

which he never hoped to make any use), as from an unconquerable desire

of precipitating himself into the difficulties and hazards of the

murder,--Caligula never failed to experience (and sometimes even to

acknowledge) a secret temptation to any murder which seemed either more

than usually abominable, or more than usually difficult. Thus, when

the two consuls were seated at his table, he burst out into sudden and

profuse laughter; and, upon their courteously requesting to know what

witty and admirable conceit might be the occasion of the imperial

mirth, he frankly owned to them, and doubtless he did not improve their

appetites by this confession, that in fact he was laughing, and that he

could not but laugh, (and then the monster laughed immoderately again,)

at the pleasant thought of seeing them both headless, and that with so

little trouble to himself, (_uno suo nutu_,) he could have both their

throats cut. No doubt he was continually balancing the arguments for and

against such little escapades; nor had any person a reason for security

in the extraordinary obligations, whether of hospitality or of religious

vows, which seemed to lay him under some peculiar restraints in that

case above all others; for such circumstances of peculiarity, by which

the murder would be stamped with unusual atrocity, were but the more

likely to make its fascinations irresistible. Hence he dallied with

the thoughts of murdering her whom he loved best, and indeed

exclusively--his wife Cæsonia; and whilst fondling her, and toying

playfully with her polished throat, he was distracted (as he half

insinuated to her) between the desire of caressing it, which might be

often repeated, and that of cutting it, which could be gratified but

once.

Nero (for as to Claudius, he came too late to the throne to indulge any

propensities of this nature with so little discretion) was but a variety

of the same species. He also was an amateur, and an enthusiastic amateur

of murder. But as this taste, in the most ingenious hands, is limited

and monotonous in its modes of manifestation, it would be tedious to run

through the long Suetonian roll-call of his peccadilloes in this way.

One only we shall cite, to illustrate the amorous delight with which he

pursued any murder which happened to be seasoned highly to his taste

by enormous atrocity, and by almost unconquerable difficulty. It would

really be pleasant, were it not for the revolting consideration of

the persons concerned, and their relation to each other, to watch the

tortuous pursuit of the hunter, and the doubles of the game, in this

obstinate chase. For certain reasons of state, as Nero attempted to

persuade himself, but in reality because no other crime had the same

attractions of unnatural horror about it, he resolved to murder his

mother Agrippina. This being settled, the next thing was to arrange

the mode and the tools. Naturally enough, according to the custom then

prevalent in Rome, he first attempted the thing by poison. The poison

failed: for Agrippina, anticipating tricks of this kind, had armed

her constitution against them, like Mithridates; and daily took potent

antidotes and prophylactics. Or else (which is more probable) the

emperor's agent in such purposes, fearing his sudden repentance and

remorse on first hearing of his mother's death, or possibly even

witnessing her agonies, had composed a poison of inferior strength. This

had certainly occurred in the case of Britannicus, who had thrown off

with ease the first dose administered to him by Nero. Upon which he

had summoned to his presence the woman employed in the affair, and

compelling her by threats to mingle a more powerful potion in his own

presence, had tried it successively upon different animals, until he

was satisfied with its effects; after which, immediately inviting

Britannicus to a banquet, he had finally dispatched him. On Agrippina,

however, no changes in the poison, whether of kind or strength, had

any effect; so that, after various trials, this mode of murder was

abandoned, and the emperor addressed himself to other plans. The first

of these was some curious mechanical device, by which a false ceiling

was to have been suspended by bolts above her bed; and in the middle

of the night, the bolt being suddenly drawn, a vast weight would have

descended with a ruinous destruction to all below. This scheme, however,

taking air from the indiscretion of some amongst the accomplices,

reached the ears of Agrippina; upon which the old lady looked about

her too sharply to leave much hope in that scheme: so _that_ also was

abandoned. Next, he conceived the idea of an artificial ship, which, at

the touch of a few springs, might fall to pieces in deep water. Such

a ship was prepared, and stationed at a suitable point. But the main

difficulty remained, which was to persuade the old lady to go on board.

Not that she knew in this case _who_ had been the ship-builder, for that

would have ruined all; but it seems that she took it ill to be hunted in

this murderous spirit, and was out of humor with her son; besides, that

any proposal coming from him, though previously indifferent to her,

would have instantly become suspected. To meet this difficulty, a sort

of reconciliation was proposed, and a very affectionate message sent,

which had the effect of throwing Agrippina off her guard, and seduced

her to Baiæ for the purpose of joining the emperor's party at a great

banquet held in commemoration of a solemn festival. She came by water

in a sort of light frigate, and was to return in the same way. Meantime

Nero tampered with the commander of her vessel, and prevailed upon him

to wreck it. What was to be done? The great lady was anxious to

return to Rome, and no proper conveyance was at hand. Suddenly it

was suggested, as if by chance, that a ship of the emperor's, new and

properly equipped, was moored at a neighboring station. This was readily

accepted by Agrippina: the emperor accompanied her to the place of

embarkation, took a most tender leave of her, and saw her set sail.

It was necessary that the vessel should get into deep water before the

experiment could be made; and with the utmost agitation this pious son

awaited news of the result. Suddenly a messenger rushed breathless

into his presence, and horrified him by the joyful information that his

august mother had met with an alarming accident; but, by the blessing

of Heaven, had escaped safe and sound, and was now on her road to mingle

congratulations with her affectionate son. The ship, it seems, had done

its office; the mechanism had played admirably; but who can provide for

every thing? The old lady, it turned out, could swim like a duck; and

the whole result had been to refresh her with a little sea-bathing. Here

was worshipful intelligence. Could any man's temper be expected to stand

such continued sieges? Money, and trouble, and infinite contrivance,

wasted upon one old woman, who absolutely would not, upon any terms, be

murdered! Provoking it certainly was; and of a man like Nero it could

not be expected that he should any longer dissemble his disgust, or put

up with such repeated affronts. He rushed upon his simple congratulating

friend, swore that he had come to murder him, and as nobody could have

suborned him but Agrippina, he ordered her off to instant execution.

And, unquestionably, if people will not be murdered quietly and in a

civil way, they must expect that such forbearance is not to continue for

ever; and obviously have themselves only to blame for any harshness or

violence which they may have rendered necessary.

It is singular, and shocking at the same time, to mention, that, for

this atrocity, Nero did absolutely receive solemn congratulations from

all orders of men. With such evidences of base servility in the public

mind, and of the utter corruption which they had sustained in their

elementary feelings, it is the less astonishing that he should have

made other experiments upon the public patience, which seem expressly

designed to try how much it would support. Whether he were really the

author of the desolating fire which consumed Rome for six [Footnote:

But a memorial stone, in its inscription, makes the time longer: "Quando

urbs per novem dies arsit Neronianis temporibus."] days and seven

nights, and drove the mass of the people into the tombs and sepulchres

for shelter, is yet a matter of some doubt. But one great presumption

against it, founded on its desperate imprudence, as attacking the people

in their primary comforts, is considerably weakened by the enormous

servility of the Romans in the case just stated: they who could

volunteer congratulations to a son for butchering his mother, (no matter

on what pretended suspicions,) might reasonably be supposed incapable of

any resistance which required courage even in a case of self-defence,

or of just revenge. The direct reasons, however, for implicating him in

this affair, seem at present insufficient. He was displeased, it seems,

with the irregularity and unsightliness of the antique buildings,

and also with the streets, as too narrow and winding, (_angustiis

flexurisque vicorum_.) But in this he did but express what was no

doubt the common judgment of all his contemporaries, who had seen the

beautiful cities of Greece and Asia Minor. The Rome of that time was

in many parts built of wood; and there is much probability that it must

have been a _picturesque_ city, and in parts almost grotesque. But it

is remarkable, and a fact which we have nowhere seen noticed, that the

ancients, whether Greeks or Romans, had no eye for the picturesque; nay,

that it was a sense utterly unawakened amongst them; and that the

very conception of the picturesque, as of a thing distinct from the

beautiful, is not once alluded to through the whole course of ancient

literature, nor would it have been intelligible to any ancient critic;

so that, whatever attraction for the eye might exist in the Rome of

that day, there is little doubt that it was of a kind to be felt only

by modern spectators. Mere dissatisfaction with its external appearance,

which must have been a pretty general sentiment, argued, therefore, no

necessary purpose of destroying it. Certainly it would be a weightier

ground of suspicion, if it were really true, that some of his agents

were detected on the premises of different senators in the act of

applying combustibles to their mansions. But this story wears a very

fabulous air. For why resort to the private dwellings of great men,

where any intruder was sure of attracting notice, when the same effect,

and with the same deadly results, might have been attained quietly and

secretly in so many of the humble Roman _coenacula_?

The great loss on this memorable occasion was in the heraldic and

ancestral honors of the city. Historic Rome then went to wreck for

ever. Then perished the _domus priscorum ducum hostilibus adhuc spoliis

adornatæ_; the "rostral" palace; the mansion of the Pompeys; the

Blenheims and the Strathfieldsays of the Scipios, the Marcelli, the

Paulli, and the Cæsars; then perished the aged trophies from Carthage

and from Gaul; and, in short, as the historian sums up the lamentable

desolation, "_quidquid visendum atque memorabile ex antiquitate

duraverat_." And this of itself might lead one to suspect the emperor's

hand as the original agent; for by no one act was it possible so

entirely and so suddenly to wean the people from their old republican

recollections, and in one week to obliterate the memorials of their

popular forces, and the trophies of many ages. The old people of Rome

were gone; their characteristic dress even was gone; for already in the

time of Augustus they had laid aside the _toga_, and assumed the cheaper

and scantier _pænula_, so that the eye sought in vain for Virgil's

"Romanes rerum dominos gentemque _togatam_."

Why, then, after all the constituents of Roman grandeur had passed away,

should their historical trophies survive, recalling to them the scenes

of departed heroism, in which they had no personal property, and

suggesting to them vain hopes, which for them were never to be other

than chimeras? Even in that sense, therefore, and as a great depository

of heart-stirring historical remembrances, Rome was profitably

destroyed; and in any other sense, whether for health or for the

conveniences of polished life, or for architectural magnificence,

there never was a doubt that the Roman people gained infinitely by this

conflagration. For, like London, it arose from its ashes with a splendor

proportioned to its vast expansion of wealth and population; and marble

took the place of wood. For the moment, however, this event must have

been felt by the people as an overwhelming calamity. And it serves to

illustrate the passive endurance and timidity of the popular temper, and

to what extent it might be provoked with impunity, that in this state

of general irritation and effervescence, Nero absolutely forbade them

to meddle with the ruins of their own dwellings--taking that charge

upon himself, with a view to the vast wealth which he anticipated

from sifting the rubbish. And, as if that mode of plunder were not

sufficient, he exacted compulsory contributions to the rebuilding of the

city so indiscriminately, as to press heavily upon all men's finances;

and thus, in the public account which universally imputed the fire to

him, he was viewed as a twofold robber, who sought to heal one calamity

by the infliction of another and a greater.

The monotony of wickedness and outrage becomes at length fatiguing

to the coarsest and most callous senses; and the historian, even, who

caters professedly for the taste which feeds upon the monstrous and the

hyperbolical, is glad at length to escape from the long evolution of

his insane atrocities, to the striking and truly scenical catastrophe of

retribution which overtook them, and avenged the wrongs of an insulted

world. Perhaps history contains no more impressive scenes than those in

which the justice of Providence at length arrested the monstrous career

of Nero.

It was at Naples, and, by a remarkable fatality, on the very anniversary

of his mother's murder, that he received the first intelligence of the

revolt in Gaul under the Proprætor Vindex. This news for about a week he

treated with levity; and, like Henry VII. of England, who was nettled,

not so much at being proclaimed a rebel, as because he was described

under the slighting denomination of "one Henry Tidder or Tudor," he

complained bitterly that Vindex had mentioned him by his family name of

Ænobarbus, rather than his assumed one of Nero. But much more keenly he

resented the insulting description of himself as a "miserable harper,"

appealing to all about him whether they had ever known a better, and

offering to stake the truth of all the other charges against himself

upon the accuracy of this in particular. So little even in this instance

was he alive to the true point of the insult; not thinking it any

disgrace that a Roman emperor should be chiefly known to the world in

the character of a harper, but only if he should happen to be a bad one.

Even in those days, however, imperfect as were the means of travelling,

rebellion moved somewhat too rapidly to allow any long interval of

security so light-minded as this. One courier followed upon the heels of

another, until he felt the necessity for leaving Naples; and he returned

to Rome, as the historian says, _prætrepidus_; by which word, however,

according to its genuine classical acceptation, we apprehend is not

meant that he was highly alarmed, but only that he was in a great hurry.

That he was not yet under any real alarm (for he trusted in certain

prophecies, which, like those made to the Scottish tyrant "kept the

promise to the ear, but broke it to the sense,") is pretty evident,

from his conduct on reaching the capitol. For, without any appeal to

the senate or the people, but sending out a few summonses to some men of

rank, he held a hasty council, which he speedily dismissed, and occupied

the rest of the day with experiments on certain musical instruments

of recent invention, in which the keys were moved by hydraulic

contrivances. He had come to Rome, it appeared, merely from a sense of

decorum.

Suddenly, however, arrived news, which fell upon him with the force of a

thunderbolt, that the revolt had extended to the Spanish provinces, and

was headed by Galba. He fainted upon hearing this; and falling to the

ground, lay for a long time lifeless, as it seemed, and speechless.

Upon coming to himself again, he tore his robe, struck his forehead, and

exclaimed aloud--that for him all was over. In this agony of mind,

it strikes across the utter darkness of the scene with the sense of a

sudden and cheering flash, recalling to us the possible goodness and

fidelity of human nature--when we read that one humble creature adhered

to him, and, according to her slender means, gave him consolation during

these trying moments; this was the woman who had tended his infant

years; and she now recalled to his remembrance such instances of

former princes in adversity, as appeared fitted to sustain his drooping

spirits. It seems, however, that, according to the general course of

violent emotions, the rebound of high spirits was in proportion to

his first despondency. He omitted nothing of his usual luxury or

self-indulgence, and he even found spirits for going _incognito_ to the

theatre, where he took sufficient interest in the public performances,

to send a message to a favorite actor. At times, even in this hopeless

situation, his native ferocity returned upon him, and he was believed to

have framed plans for removing all his enemies at once--the leaders of

the rebellion, by appointing successors to their offices, and secretly

sending assassins to dispatch their persons; the senate, by poison at a

great banquet; the Gaulish provinces, by delivering them up for pillage

to the army; the city, by again setting it on fire, whilst, at the same

time, a vast number of wild beasts was to have been turned loose upon

the unarmed populace--for the double purpose of destroying them, and

of distracting their attention from the fire. But, as the mood of his

frenzy changed, these sanguinary schemes were abandoned, (not, however,

under any feelings of remorse, but from mere despair of effecting them,)

and on the same day, but after a luxurious dinner, the imperial monster

grew bland and pathetic in his ideas; he would proceed to the rebellious

army; he would present himself unarmed to their view; and would recall

them to their duty by the mere spectacle of his tears. Upon the pathos

with which he would weep he was resolved to rely entirely. And having

received the guilty to his mercy without distinction, upon the following

day he would unite _his_ joy with _their_ joy, and would chant hymns of

victory (_epinicia_)--"which by the way," said he, suddenly, breaking

off to his favorite pursuits, "it is necessary that I should immediately

compose." This caprice vanished like the rest; and he made an effort

to enlist the slaves and citizens into his service, and to raise by

extortion a large military chest. But in the midst of these vascillating

purposes fresh tidings surprised him--other armies had revolted, and the

rebellion was spreading contagiously. This consummation of his alarms

reached him at dinner; and the expressions of his angry fears took even

a scenical air; he tore the dispatches, upset the table, and dashed to

pieces upon the ground two crystal beakers--which had a high value

as works of art, even in the _Aurea Domus_, from the sculptures which

adorned them.

He now prepared for flight; and, sending forward commissioners to

prepare the fleet at Ostia for his reception, he tampered with such

officers of the army as were at hand, to prevail upon them to accompany

his retreat. But all showed themselves indisposed to such schemes, and

some flatly refused. Upon which he turned to other counsels; sometimes

meditating a flight to the King of Parthia, or even to throw himself on

the mercy of Galba; sometimes inclining rather to the plan of venturing

into the forum in mourning apparel, begging pardon for his past

offences, and, as a last resource, entreating that he might receive the

appointment of Egyptian prefect. This plan, however, he hesitated to

adopt, from some apprehension that he should be torn to pieces in his

road to the forum; and, at all events, he concluded to postpone it

to the following day. Meantime events were now hurrying to their

catastrophe, which for ever anticipated that intention. His hours were

numbered, and the closing scene was at hand.

In the middle of the night he was aroused from slumber with the

intelligence that the military guard, who did duty at the palace, had

all quited their posts. Upon this the unhappy prince leaped from

his couch, never again to taste the luxury of sleep, and dispatched

messengers to his friends. No answers were returned; and upon that he

went personally with a small retinue to their hotels. But he found their

doors every where closed; and all his importunities could not avail to

extort an answer. Sadly and slowly he returned to his own bedchamber;

but there again he found fresh instances of desertion, which had

occurred during his short absence; the pages of his bedchamber had

fled, carrying with them the coverlids of the imperial bed, which were

probably inwrought with gold, and even a golden box, in which Nero

had on the preceding day deposited poison prepared against the last

extremity. Wounded to the heart by this general desertion, and perhaps

by some special case of ingratitude, such as would probably enough be

signalized in the flight of his personal favorites, he called for

a gladiator of the household to come and dispatch him. But none

appearing,--"What!" said he, "have I neither friend nor foe?" And so

saying, he ran towards the Tiber, with the purpose of drowning himself.

But that paroxysm, like all the rest, proved transient; and he expressed

a wish for some hiding-place, or momentary asylum, in which he might

collect his unsettled spirits, and fortify his wandering resolution.

Such a retreat was offered to him by his _libertus_ Phaon, in his own

rural villa, about four miles distant from Rome. The offer was accepted;

and the emperor, without further preparation than that of throwing over

his person a short mantle of a dusky hue, and enveloping his head and

face in a handkerchief, mounted his horse, and left Rome with four

attendants. It was still night, but probably verging towards the early

dawn; and even at that hour the imperial party met some travellers on

their way to Rome (coming up, no doubt, [Footnote: At this early hour,

witnesses, sureties, &c., and all concerned in the law courts, came up

to Rome from villas, country towns, &c. But no ordinary call existed

to summon travellers in the opposite direction; which accounts for the

comment of the travellers on the errand of Nero and his attendants.]

on law business)--who said, as they passed, "These men are certainly

in chase of Nero." Two other incidents, of an interesting nature, are

recorded of this short but memorable ride; at one point of the road,

the shouts of the soldiery assailed their ears from the neighboring

encampment of Galba. They were probably then getting under arms for

their final march to take possession of the palace. At another point, an

accident occurred of a more unfortunate kind, but so natural and so well

circumstantiated, that it serves to verify the whole narrative; a dead

body was lying on the road, at which the emperor's horse started so

violently as nearly to dismount his rider, and under the difficulty

of the moment compelled him to withdraw the hand which held up the

handkerchief, and suddenly to expose his features. Precisely at this

critical moment it happened that an old half-pay officer passed,

recognised the emperor, and saluted him. Perhaps it was with some

purpose of applying a remedy to this unfortunate rencontre, that the

party dismounted at a point where several roads met, and turned their

horses adrift to graze at will amongst the furze and brambles. Their

own purpose was, to make their way to the back of the villa; but,

to accomplish that, it was necessary that they should first cross

a plantation of reeds, from the peculiar state of which they found

themselves obliged to cover successively each space upon which they

trode with parts of their dress, in order to gain any supportable

footing. In this way, and contending with such hardships, they reached

at length the postern side of the villa. Here we must suppose that

there was no regular ingress; for, after waiting until an entrance was

pierced, it seems that the emperor could avail himself of it in no more

dignified posture, than by creeping through the hole on his hands and

feet, (_quadrupes per angustias receptus_.)

Now, then, after such anxiety, alarm, and hardship, Nero had reached a

quiet rural asylum. But for the unfortunate concurrence of his horse's

alarm with the passing of the soldier, he might perhaps have counted on

a respite of a day or two in this noiseless and obscure abode. But what

a habitation for him who was yet ruler of the world in the eye of law,

and even _de facto_ was so, had any fatal accident befallen his aged

competitor! The room in which (as the one most removed from notice and

suspicion) he had secreted himself, was a cella, or little sleeping

closet of a slave, furnished only with a miserable pallet and a coarse

rug. Here lay the founder and possessor of the Golden House, too happy

if he might hope for the peaceable possession even of this miserable

crypt. But that, he knew too well, was impossible. A rival pretender to

the empire was like the plague of fire--as dangerous in the shape of

a single spark left unextinguished, as in that of a prosperous

conflagration. But a few brief sands yet remained to run in the

emperor's hour-glass; much variety of degradation or suffering seemed

scarcely within the possibilities of his situation, or within the

compass of the time. Yet, as though Providence had decreed that

his humiliation should pass through every shape, and speak by every

expression which came home to his understanding, or was intelligible

to his senses, even in these few moments he was attacked by hunger and

thirst. No other bread could be obtained (or, perhaps, if the emperor's

presence were concealed from the household, it was not safe to raise

suspicion by calling for better) than that which was ordinarily given

to slaves, coarse, black, and, to a palate so luxurious, doubtless

disgusting. This accordingly he rejected; but a little tepid water

he drank. After which, with the haste of one who fears that he may be

prematurely interrupted, but otherwise, with all the reluctance which

we may imagine, and which his streaming tears proclaimed, he addressed

himself to the last labor in which he supposed himself to have any

interest on this earth--that of digging a grave. Measuring a space

adjusted to the proportions of his person, he inquired anxiously for

any loose fragments of marble, such as might suffice to line it. He

requested also to be furnished with wood and water, as the materials

for the last sepulchral rites. And these labors were accompanied, or

continually interrupted by tears and lamentations, or by passionate

ejaculations on the blindness of fortune, in suffering so divine an

artist to be thus violently snatched away, and on the calamitous fate of

musical science, which then stood on the brink of so dire an eclipse. In

these moments he was most truly in an _agony_, according to the original

meaning of that word; for the conflict was great between two master

principles of his nature: on the one hand, he clung with the weakness of

a girl to life, even in that miserable shape to which it had now sunk;

and like the poor malefactor, with whose last struggles Prior has so

atrociously amused himself, "he often took leave, but was loath to

depart." Yet, on the other hand, to resign his life very speedily,

seemed his only chance for escaping the contumelies, perhaps the

tortures, of his enemies; and, above all other considerations, for

making sure of a burial, and possibly of burial rites; to want which, in

the judgment of the ancients, was the last consummation of misery. Thus

occupied, and thus distracted--sternly attracted to the grave by his

creed, hideously repelled by infirmity of nature--he was suddenly

interrupted by a courier with letters for the master of the house;

letters, and from Rome! What was their import? That was soon

told--briefly that Nero was adjudged to be a public enemy by the senate,

and that official orders were issued for apprehending him, in order that

he might be brought to condign punishment according to the method of

ancient precedent. Ancient precedent! _more majorum!_ And how was that?

eagerly demanded the emperor. He was answered--that the state criminal

in such cases was first stripped naked, then impaled as it were between

the prongs of a pitchfork, and in that condition scourged to death.

Horror-struck with this account, he drew forth two poniards, or short

swords, tried their edges, and then, in utter imbecility of purpose,

returned them to their scabbards, alleging that the destined moment had

not yet arrived. Then he called upon Sporus, the infamous partner in

his former excesses, to commence the funeral anthem. Others, again, he

besought to lead the way in dying, and to sustain him by the spectacle

of their example. But this purpose also he dismissed in the very moment

of utterance; and turning away despairingly, he apostrophized himself in

words reproachful or animating, now taxing his nature with infirmity of

purpose, now calling on himself by name, with adjurations to remember

his dignity, and to act worthy of his supreme station: _ou prepei

Neroni_, cried he, _ou prepeu næphein dei en tois toidætois ale, eleire

seauton_--i.e. "Fie, fie, then Nero! such a season calls for perfect

self-possession. Up, then, and rouse thyself to action."

Thus, and in similar efforts to master the weakness of his reluctant

nature--weakness which would extort pity from the severest minds, were

it not from the odious connection which in him it had with cruelty

the most merciless--did this unhappy prince, _jam non salutis spem sed

exitii solatium quærens_, consume the flying moments, until at length

his ears caught the fatal sounds or echoes from a body of horsemen

riding up to the villa. These were the officers charged with his arrest;

and if he should fall into their hands alive, he knew that his last

chance was over for liberating himself, by a Roman death, from the

burthen of ignominious life, and from a lingering torture. He paused

from his restless motions, listened attentively, then repeated a line

from Homer--

Ippon m' ochupodon amphi chtupos ouata ballei

(The resounding tread of swift-footed horses reverberates upon my

ears);--then under some momentary impulse of courage, gained perhaps by

figuring to himself the bloody populace rioting upon his mangled body,

yet even then needing the auxiliary hand and vicarious courage of his

private secretary, the feeble-hearted prince stabbed himself in the

throat. The wound, however, was not such as to cause instant death. He

was still breathing, and not quite speechless, when the centurion who

commanded the party entered the closet; and to this officer, who uttered

a few hollow words of encouragement, he was still able to make a brief

reply. But in the very effort of speaking he expired, and with an

expression of horror impressed upon his stiffened features, which

communicated a sympathetic horror to all beholders.

Such was the too memorable tragedy which closed for ever the brilliant

line of the Julian family, and translated the august title of Cæsar

from its original purpose as a proper name to that of an official

designation. It is the most striking instance upon record of a dramatic

and extreme vengeance overtaking extreme guilt; for, as Nero had

exhausted the utmost possibilities of crime, so it may be affirmed that

he drank off the cup of suffering to the very extremity of what his

peculiar nature allowed. And in no life of so short a duration, have

there ever been crowded equal extremities of gorgeous prosperity and

abject infamy. It may be added, as another striking illustration of the

rapid mutability and revolutionary excesses which belonged to what

has been properly called the Roman _stratocracy_ then disposing of

the world, that within no very great succession of weeks that same

victorious rebel, the Emperor Galba, at whose feet Nero had been

self-immolated, was laid a murdered corpse in the same identical cell

which had witnessed the lingering agonies of his unhappy victim. This

was the act of an emancipated slave, anxious, by a vindictive insult to

the remains of one prince, to place on record his gratitude to another.

"So runs the world away!" And in this striking way is retribution

sometimes dispensed.

In the sixth Cæsar terminated the Julian line. The three next princes in

the succession were personally uninteresting; and, with a slight

reserve in favor of Otho, whose motives for committing suicide (if truly

reported) argue great nobility of mind, [Footnote: We may add that the

unexampled public grief which followed the death of Otho, exceeding

even that which followed the death of Germanicus, and causing several

officers to commit suicide, implies some remarkable goodness in this

Prince, and a very unusual power of conciliating attachment.] were

even brutal in the tenor of their lives and monstrous; besides that the

extreme brevity of their several reigns (all three, taken conjunctly,

having held the supreme power for no more than twelve months and twenty

days) dismisses them from all effectual station or right to a separate

notice in the line of Cæsars. Coming to the tenth in succession,

Vespasian, and his two sons, Titus and Domitian, who make up the list of

the twelve Cæsars, as they are usually called, we find matter for

deeper political meditation and subjects of curious research. But

these emperors would be more properly classed with the five who succeed

them--Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, and the two Antonines; after whom comes

the young ruffian, Commodus, another Caligula or Nero, from whose

short and infamous reign Gibbon takes up his tale of the decline of the

empire. And this classification would probably have prevailed, had

not the very curious work of Suetonius, whose own life and period of

observation determined the series and cycle of his subjects, led to a

different distribution. But as it is evident that, in the succession of

the first twelve Cæsars, the six latter have no connection whatever by

descent, collaterally, or otherwise, with the six first, it would be a

more logical distribution to combine them according to the fortunes

of the state itself, and the succession of its prosperity through the

several stages of splendor, declension, revival, and final decay. Under

this arrangement, the first seventeen would belong to the first stage;

Commodus would open the second; Aurelian down to Constantine or Julian

would fill the third; and Jovian to Augustulus would bring up the

melancholy rear. Meantime it will be proper, after thus briefly throwing

our eyes over the monstrous atrocities of the early Cæsars, to spend a

few lines in examining their origin, and the circumstances which favored

their growth. For a mere hunter after hidden or forgotten singularities;

a lover on their own account of all strange perversities and freaks

of nature, whether in action, taste, or opinion; for a collector and

amateur of misgrowths and abortions; for a Suetonius, in short, it may

be quite enough to state and to arrange his cabinet of specimens from

the marvellous in human nature. But certainly in modern times, any

historian, however little affecting the praise of a philosophic

investigator, would feel himself called upon to remove a little

the taint of the miraculous and preternatural which adheres to

such anecdotes, by entering into the psychological grounds of their

possibility; whether lying in any peculiarly vicious education, early

familiarity with bad models, corrupting associations, or other plausible

key to effects, which, taken separately, and out of their natural

connection with their explanatory causes, are apt rather to startle and

revolt the feelings of sober thinkers. Except, perhaps, in some chapters

of Italian history, as, for example, among the most profligate of the

Papal houses, and amongst some of the Florentine princes, we find hardly

any parallel to the atrocities of Caligula and Nero; nor indeed was

Tiberius much (if at all) behind them, though otherwise so wary and

cautious in his conduct. The same tenor of licentiousness beyond the

needs of the individual, the same craving after the marvellous and the

stupendous in guilt, is continually emerging in succeeding emperors--in

Vitellius, in Domitian, in Commodus, in Caracalla--every where, in

short, where it was not overruled by one of two causes, either by

original goodness of nature too powerful to be mastered by ordinary

seductions, (and in some cases removed from their influence by an

early apprenticeship to camps,) or by the terrors of an exemplary ruin

immediately preceding. For such a determinate tendency to the enormous

and the anomalous, sufficient causes must exist. What were they?

In the first place, we may observe that the people of Rome in that

age were generally more corrupt by many degrees than has been usually

supposed possible. The effect of revolutionary times, to relax all modes

of moral obligation, and to unsettle the moral sense, has been well and

philosophically stated by Mr. Coleridge; but that would hardly account

for the utter licentiousness and depravity of Imperial Rome. Looking

back to Republican Rome, and considering the state of public morals but

fifty years before the emperors, we can with difficulty believe that

the descendants of a people so severe in their habits could thus rapidly

degenerate, and that a populace, once so hardy and masculine, should

assume the manners which we might expect in the debauchees of Daphne

(the infamous suburb of Antioch) or of Canopus, into which settled the

very lees and dregs of the vicious Alexandria. Such extreme changes

would falsify all that we know of human nature; we might _à priori_

pronounce them impossible; and in fact, upon searching history, we find

other modes of solving the difficulty. In reality, the citizens of Rome

were at this time a new race, brought together from every quarter of

the world, but especially from Asia. So vast a proportion of the ancient

citizens had been cut off by the sword, and partly to conceal this waste

of population, but much more by way of cheaply requiting services, or of

showing favor, or of acquiring influence, slaves had been emancipated

in such great multitudes, and afterwards invested with all the rights

of citizens, that, in a single generation, Rome became almost transmuted

into a baser metal; the progeny of those whom the last generation had

purchased from the slave merchants. These people derived their stock

chiefly from Cappadocia, Pontus, &c., and the other populous regions of

Asia Minor; and hence the taint of Asiatic luxury and depravity, which

was so conspicuous to all the Romans of the old republican severity.

Juvenal is to be understood more literally than is sometimes supposed,

when he complains that long before his time the Orontes (that river

which washed the infamous capital of Syria) had mingled its impure

waters with those of the Tiber. And a little before him, Lucan speaks

with mere historic gravity when he says--

------"Vivant Galatæque Syrique

Cappadoces, Gallique, extremique orbis Iberi,

Armenii, Cilices: _nam post civilia bella

Hic Populus Romanus erit_."

[Footnote: Blackwell, in his Court of Augustus, vol. i. p. 382, when

noticing these lines upon occasion of the murder of Cicero, in the final

proscription under the last triumvirate, comments thus: "Those of the

greatest and truly Roman spirit had been murdered in the field by

Julius Cæsar; the rest were now massacred in the city by his son and

successors; in their room came Syrians, Cappadocians, Phrygians, and

other enfranchised slaves from the conquered nations;"--"these in half

a century had sunk so low, that Tiberius pronounced her very senators to

be _homines ad sermtutem natos_, men born to be slaves."]

Probably in the time of Nero, not one man in six was of pure Roman

descent. [Footnote: Suetonius indeed pretends that Augustus, personally

at least, struggled against this ruinous practice--thinking it a matter

of the highest moment, "Sincerum atque ab omni colluvione peregrini et

servilis sanguinis incorruptum servare populum." And Horace is ready

with his flatteries on the same topic, lib. 3, Od. 6. But the facts

are against them; for the question is not what Augustus did in his

own person, (which at most could not operate very widely except by the

example,) but what he permitted to be done. Now there was a practice

familiar to those times; that when a congiary or any other popular

liberality was announced, multitudes were enfranchised by avaricious

masters in order to make them capable of the bounty, (as citizens,) and

yet under the condition of transferring to their emancipators whatsoever

they should receive; _ina ton dæmosios d domenon siton lambanontes

chata mæna--pherosi tois dedochasi tæn eleutherian_ says Dionysius of

Halicarnassus, in order that after receiving the corn given publicly

in every month, they might carry it to those who had bestowed upon them

their freedom. In a case, then, where an extensive practice of this

kind was exposed to Augustus, and publicly reproved by him, how did he

proceed? Did he reject the new-made citizens? No; he contented himself

with diminishing the proportion originally destined for each, so that

the same absolute sum being distributed among a number increased by the

whole amount of the new enrolments, of necessity the relative sum for

each separately was so much less. But this was a remedy applied only

to the pecuniary fraud as it would have affected himself. The permanent

mischief to the state went unredressed.] And the consequences were

suitable. Scarcely a family has come down to our knowledge that could

not in one generation enumerate a long catalogue of divorces within its

own contracted circle. Every man had married a series of wives; every

woman a series of husbands. Even in the palace of Augustus, who wished

to be viewed as an _exemplar_ or ideal model of domestic purity, every

principal member of his family was tainted in that way; himself in a

manner and a degree infamous even at that time. [Footnote: Part of the

story is well known, but not the whole. Tiberius Nero, a promising young

nobleman, had recently married a very splendid beauty. Unfortunately for

him, at the marriage of Octavia (sister to Augustus) with Mark Anthony,

he allowed his young wife, then about eighteen, to attend upon the

bride. Augustus was deeply and suddenly fascinated by her charms, and

without further scruple sent a message to Nero--intimating that he was

in love with his wife, and would thank him to resign her. The other,

thinking it vain, in those days of lawless proscription, to contest a

point of this nature with one who commanded twelve legions, obeyed the

requisition. Upon some motive, now unknown, he was persuaded even to

degrade himself farther; for he actually officiated at the marriage

in character of father, and gave away the young beauty to his rival,

although at that time six months advanced in pregnancy by himself. These

humiliating concessions were extorted from him, and yielded (probably

at the instigation of friends) in order to save his life. In the sequel

they had the very opposite result; for he died soon after, and it is

reasonably supposed of grief and mortification. At the marriage feast,

an incident occurred which threw the whole company into confusion: A

little boy, roving from couch to couch among the guests, came at length

to that in which Livia (the bride) was lying by the side of Augustus,

on which he cried out aloud,--"Lady, what are you doing here? You

are mistaken--this is not your husband--he is there," (pointing to

Tiberius,) "go, go--rise, lady, and recline beside _him_."] For the

first 400 years of Rome, not one divorce had been granted or asked,

although the statute which allowed of this indulgence had always been

in force. But in the age succeeding to the civil wars men and women

"married," says one author, "with a view to divorce, and divorced

in order to marry. Many of these changes happened within the year,

especially if the lady had a large fortune, which always went with her,

and procured her choice of transient husbands." And, "can one imagine,"

asks the same writer, "that the fair one, who changed her husband every

quarter, strictly kept her matrimonial faith all the three months?" Thus

the very fountain of all the "household charities" and household

virtues was polluted. And after that we need little wonder at the

assassinations, poisonings, and forging of wills, which then laid waste

the domestic life of the Romans.

2. A second source of the universal depravity was the growing inefficacy

of the public religion; and this arose from its disproportion and

inadequacy to the intellectual advances of the nation. _Religion_, in

its very etymology, has been held to imply a _religatio_, that is, a

reiterated or secondary obligation of morals; a sanction supplementary

to that of the conscience. Now, for a rude and uncultivated people, the

Pagan mythology might not be too gross to discharge the main functions

of a useful religion. So long as the understanding could submit to the

fables of the Pagan creed, so long it was possible that the hopes and

fears built upon that creed might be practically efficient on men's

lives and intentions. But when the foundation gave way, the whole

superstructure of necessity fell to the ground. Those who were obliged

to reject the ridiculous legends which invested the whole of their

Pantheon, together with the fabulous adjudgers of future punishments,

could not but dismiss the punishments, which were, in fact, as

laughable, and as obviously the fictions of human ingenuity, as their

dispensers. In short, the civilized part of the world in those days

lay in this dreadful condition; their intellect had far outgrown their

religion; the disproportions between the two were at length become

monstrous; and as yet no purer or more elevated faith was prepared

for their acceptance. The case was as shocking as if, with our present

intellectual needs, we should be unhappy enough to have no creed on

which to rest the burden of our final hopes and fears, of our moral

obligations, and of our consolations in misery, except the fairy

mythology of our nurses. The condition of a people so situated, of a

people under the calamity of having outgrown its religious faith, has

never been sufficiently considered. It is probable that such a

condition has never existed before or since that era of the world. The

consequences to Rome were--that the reasoning and disputatious part of

her population took refuge from the painful state of doubt in Atheism;

amongst the thoughtless and irreflective the consequences were chiefly

felt in their morals, which were thus sapped in their foundation.

3. A third cause, which from the first had exercised a most baleful

influence upon the arts and upon literature in Rome, had by this time

matured its disastrous tendencies towards the extinction of the moral

sensibilities. This was the circus, and the whole machinery, form and

substance, of the Circensian shows. Why had tragedy no existence as a

part of the Roman literature? Because--and _that_ was a reason which

would have sufficed to stifle all the dramatic genius of Greece and

England--there was too much tragedy in the shape of gross reality,

almost daily before their eyes. The amphitheatre extinguished the

theatre. How was it possible that the fine and intellectual griefs of

the drama should win their way to hearts seared and rendered callous

by the continual exhibition of scenes the most hideous, in which human

blood was poured out like water, and a human life sacrificed at any

moment either to caprice in the populace, or to a strife of rivalry

between the _ayes_ and the _noes_, or as the penalty for any trifling

instance of awkwardness in the performer himself? Even the more innocent

exhibitions, in which brutes only were the sufferers, could not but be

mortal to all the finer sensibilities. Five thousand wild animals, torn

from their native abodes in the wilderness or forest, were often turned

out to be hunted, or for mutual slaughter, in the course of a single

exhibition of this nature; and it sometimes happened, (a fact which of

itself proclaims the course of the public propensities,) that the person

at whose expense the shows were exhibited, by way of paying special

court to the people and meriting their favor, in the way most

conspicuously open to him, issued orders that all, without a solitary

exception, should be slaughtered. He made it known, as the very highest

gratification which the case allowed, that (in the language of our

modern auctioneers) the whole, "without reserve," should perish before

their eyes. Even such spectacles must have hardened the heart, and

blunted the more delicate sensibilities; but these would soon cease to

stimulate the pampered and exhausted sense. From the combats of tigers

or leopards, in which the passions could only be gathered indirectly,

and by way of inference from the motions, the transition must have been

almost inevitable to those of men, whose nobler and more varied passions

spoke directly, and by the intelligible language of the eye, to human

spectators; and from the frequent contemplation of these authorized

murders, in which a whole people, women [Footnote: Augustus, indeed,

strove to exclude the women from one part of the circension spectacles;

and what was that? Simply from the sight of the _Athletæ_, as being

naked. But that they should witness the pangs of the dying gladiators,

he deemed quite allowable. The smooth barbarian considered; that a

license of the first sort offended against decorum, whilst the other

violated only the sanctities of the human heart, and the whole sexual

character of women. It is our opinion, that to the brutalizing effect of

these exhibitions we are to ascribe not only the early extinction of the

Roman drama, but generally the inferiority of Rome to Greece in every

department of the fine arts. The fine temper of Roman sensibility, which

no culture could have brought to the level of the Grecian, was

thus dulled for _every_ application.] as much as men, and children

intermingled with both, looked on with leisurely indifference, with

anxious expectation, or with rapturous delight, whilst below them were

passing the direct sufferings of humanity, and not seldom its dying

pangs, it was impossible to expect a result different from that

which did in fact take place,--universal hardness of heart, obdurate

depravity, and a twofold degradation of human nature, which acted

simultaneously upon the two pillars of morality, (which are otherwise

not often assailed together,) of natural sensibility in the first place,

and, in the second, of conscientious principle.

4. But these were circumstances which applied to the whole population

indiscriminately. Superadded to these, in the case of the emperor, and

affecting _him_ exclusively, was this prodigious disadvantage--that

ancient reverence for the immediate witnesses of his actions, and for

the people and senate who would under other circumstances have exercised

the old functions of the censor, was, as to the emperor, pretty nearly

obliterated. The very title of _imperator_, from which we have derived

our modern one of _emperor_, proclaims the nature of the government, and

the tenure of that office. It was purely a government by the sword, or

permanent _stratocracy_ having a movable head. Never was there a people

who inquired so impertinently as the Romans into the domestic conduct

of each private citizen. No rank escaped this jealous vigilance; and

private liberty, even in the most indifferent circumstances of taste or

expense, was sacrificed to this inquisitorial rigor of _surveillance_

exercised on behalf of the State, sometimes by erroneous patriotism, too

often by malice in disguise. To this spirit the highest public officers

were obliged to bow; the consuls, not less than others. And even the

occasional dictator, if by law irresponsible, acted nevertheless as one

who knew that any change which depressed his party, might eventually

abrogate his privilege. For the first time in the person of an imperator

was seen a supreme autocrat, who had virtually and effectively all the

irresponsibility which the law assigned, and the origin of his office

presumed. Satisfied to know that he possessed such power, Augustus,

as much from natural taste as policy, was glad to dissemble it, and by

every means to withdraw it from public notice. But he had passed his

youth as citizen of a republic; and in the state of transition to

autocracy, in his office of triumvir, had experimentally known the

perils of rivalship, and the pains of foreign control, too feelingly

to provoke unnecessarily any sleeping embers of the republican spirit.

Tiberius, though familiar from his infancy with the servile homage of a

court, was yet modified by the popular temper of Augustus; and he came

late to the throne. Caligula was the first prince on whom the entire

effect of his political situation was allowed to operate; and the

natural results were seen--he was the first absolute monster. He must

early have seen the realities of his position, and from what quarter it

was that any cloud could arise to menace his security. To the senate or

people any respect which he might think proper to pay, must have been

imputed by all parties to the lingering superstitions of custom, to

involuntary habit, to court dissimulation, or to the decencies of

external form, and the prescriptive reverence of ancient names. But

neither senate nor people could enforce their claims, whatever they

might happen to be. Their sanction and ratifying vote might be worth

having, as consecrating what was already secure, and conciliating the

scruples of the weak to the absolute decision of the strong. But their

resistance, as an original movement, was so wholly without hope, that

they were never weak enough to threaten it.

The army was the true successor to their places, being the _ultimate_

depository of power. Yet, as the army was necessarily subdivided, as the

shifting circumstances upon every frontier were continually varying the

strength of the several divisions as to numbers and state of discipline,

one part might be balanced against the other by an imperator standing

in the centre of the whole. The rigor of the military _sacramentum_, or

oath of allegiance, made it dangerous to offer the first overtures to

rebellion; and the money, which the soldiers were continually depositing

in the bank, placed at the foot of their military standards, if

sometimes turned against the emperor, was also liable to be sequestrated

in his favor. There were then, in fact, two great forces in the

government acting in and by each other--the Stratocracy, and the

Autocracy. Each needed the other; each stood in awe of each. But, as

regarded all other forces in the empire, constitutional or irregular,

popular or senatorial, neither had any thing to fear. Under any ordinary

circumstances, therefore, considering the hazards of a rebellion, the

emperor was substantially liberated from all control. Vexations or

outrages upon the populace were not such to the army. It was but rarely

that the soldier participated in the emotions of the citizen. And thus,

being effectually without check, the most vicious of the Cæsars went on

without fear, presuming upon the weakness of one part of his subjects,

and the indifference of the other, until he was tempted onwards to

atrocities, which armed against him the common feelings of human

nature, and all mankind, as it were, rose in a body with one voice, and

apparently with one heart, united by mere force of indignant sympathy,

to put him down, and "abate" him as a monster. But, until he brought

matters to this extremity, Cæsar had no cause to fear. Nor was it at all

certain, in any one instance, where this exemplary chastisement overtook

him, that the apparent unanimity of the actors went further than the

_practical_ conclusion of "abating" the imperial nuisance, or that their

indignation had settled upon the same offences. In general the army

measured the guilt by the public scandal, rather than by its moral

atrocity; and Cæsar suffered perhaps in every case, not so much because

he had violated his duties, as because he had dishonored his office.

It is, therefore, in the total absence of the checks which have almost

universally existed to control other despots, under some indirect shape,

even where none was provided by the laws, that we must seek for the

main peculiarity affecting the condition of the Roman Cæsar, which

peculiarity it was, superadded to the other three, that finally made

those three operative in their fullest extent. It is in the perfection

of the stratocracy that we must look for the key to the excesses of the

autocrat. Even in the bloody despotisms of the Barbary States, there has

always existed in the religious prejudices of the people, which could

not be violated with safety, one check more upon the caprices of the

despot than was found at Rome. Upon the whole, therefore, what affects

us on the first reading as a prodigy or anomaly in the frantic outrages

of the early Cæsars--falls within the natural bounds of intelligible

human nature, when we state the case considerately. Surrounded by a

population which had not only gone through a most vicious and corrupting

discipline, and had been utterly ruined by the license of revolutionary

times, and the bloodiest proscriptions, but had even been extensively

changed in its very elements, and from the descendants of Romulus had

been transmuted into an Asiatic mob;--starting from this point, and

considering as the second feature of the case, that this transfigured

people, _morally_ so degenerate, were carried, however, by the progress

of civilization to a certain intellectual altitude, which the popular

religion had not strength to ascend--but from inherent disproportion

remained at the base of the general civilization, incapable of

accompanying the other elements in their advance;--thirdly, that this

polished condition of society, which should naturally with the evils of

a luxurious repose have counted upon its pacific benefits, had yet, by

means of its circus and its gladiatorial contests, applied a constant

irritation, and a system of provocations to the appetites for blood,

such as in all other nations are connected with the rudest stages of

society, and with the most barbarous modes of warfare, nor even in such

circumstances without many palliatives wanting to the spectators of the

circus;--combining these considerations, we have already a key to the

enormities and hideous excesses of the Roman Imperator. The hot blood

which excites, and the adventurous courage which accompanies, the

excesses of sanguinary warfare, presuppose a condition of the moral

nature not to be compared for malignity and baleful tendency to the

cool and cowardly spirit of amateurship, in which the Roman (perhaps

an effeminate Asiatic) sat looking down upon the bravest of men,

(Thracians, or other Europeans,) mangling each other for his recreation.

When, lastly, from such a population, and thus disciplined from

his nursery days, we suppose the case of one individual selected,

privileged, and raised to a conscious irresponsibility, except at

the bar of one extra-judicial tribunal, not easily irritated, and

notoriously to be propitiated by other means than those of upright

or impartial conduct, we lay together the elements of a situation too

trying for poor human nature, and fitted only to the faculties of an

angel or a demon; of an angel, if we suppose him to resist its

full temptations; of a demon, if we suppose him to use its total

opportunities. Thus interpreted and solved, Caligula and Nero become

ordinary men.

But, finally, what if, after all, the worst of the Cæsars, and those

in particular, were entitled to the benefit of a still shorter and more

conclusive apology? What if, in a true medical sense, they were insane?

It is certain that a vein of madness ran in the family; and anecdotes

are recorded of the three worst, which go far to establish it as a fact,

and others which would imply it as symptoms--preceding or accompanying.

As belonging to the former class, take the following story: At midnight

an elderly gentleman suddenly sends round a message to a select party

of noblemen, rouses them out of bed, and summons them instantly to his

palace. Trembling for their lives from the suddenness of the summons,

and from the unseasonable hour, and scarcely doubting that by

some anonymous _delator_ they have been implicated as parties to a

conspiracy, they hurry to the palace--are received in portentous silence

by the ushers and pages in attendance--are conducted to a saloon, where

(as in every where else) the silence of night prevails, united with the

silence of fear and whispering expectation. All are seated--all look at

each other in ominous anxiety. Which is accuser? Which is the accused?

On whom shall their suspicion settle--on whom their pity? All are

silent--almost speechless--and even the current of their thoughts is

frost-bound by fear. Suddenly the sound of a fiddle or a viol is caught

from a distance--it swells upon the ear--steps approach--and in

another moment in rushes the elderly gentleman, grave and gloomy as his

audience, but capering about in a frenzy of excitement. For half an

hour he continues to perform all possible evolutions of caprioles,

pirouettes, and other extravagant feats of activity, accompanying

himself on the fiddle; and, at length, not having once looked at

his guests, the elderly gentleman whirls out of the room in the same

transport of emotion with which he entered it; the panic-struck visitors

are requested by a slave to consider themselves as dismissed: they

retire; resume their couches:--the nocturnal pageant has "dislimned" and

vanished; and on the following morning, were it not for their concurring

testimonies, all would be disposed to take this interruption of their

sleep for one of its most fantastic dreams. The elderly gentleman, who

figured in this delirious _pas seul_--who was he? He was Tiberius Cæsar,

king of kings, and lord of the terraqueous globe. Would a British jury

demand better evidence than this of a disturbed intellect in any formal

process _de lunatico inquirendo_? For Caligula, again, the evidence of

symptoms is still plainer. He knew his own defect; and purposed going

through a course of hellebore. Sleeplessness, one of the commonest

indications of lunacy, haunted him in an excess rarely recorded.

[Footnote: No fiction of romance presents so awful a picture of the

ideal tyrant as that of Caligula by Suetonius. His palace--radiant with

purple and gold, but murder every where lurking beneath flowers; his

smiles and echoing laughter--masking (yet hardly meant to mask) his

foul treachery of heart; his hideous and tumultuous dreams--his baffled

sleep--and his sleepless nights--compose the picture of an Æschylus.

What a master's sketch lies in these few lines: "Incitabatur insomnio

maxime; neque enim plus tribus horis nocturnis quiescebat; ac ne his

placida quiete, at pavida miris rerum imaginibus: ut qui inter ceteras

pelagi quondam speciem colloquentem secum videre visus sit. Ideoque

magna parte noctis, vigilse cubandique tsedio, nunc toro residens, nunc

per longissimas porticus vagus, invocare identidem atque exspectare

lucem consueverat:"--i. e., But, above all, he was tormented with

nervous irritation, by sleeplessness; for he enjoyed not more than three

hours of nocturnal repose; nor these even in pure untroubled rest, but

agitated by phantasmata of portentous augury; as, for example, upon

one occasion he fancied that he saw the sea, under some definite

impersonation, conversing with himself. Hence it was, and from this

incapacity of sleeping, and from weariness of lying awake, that he had

fallen into habits of ranging all the night long through the palace,

sometimes throwing himself on a couch, sometimes wandering along the

vast corridors, watching for the earliest dawn, and anxiously invoking

its approach.] The same, or similar facts, might be brought forward on

behalf of Nero. And thus these unfortunate princes, who have so long

(and with so little investigation of their cases) passed for monsters or

for demoniac counterfeits of men, would at length be brought back within

the fold of humanity, as objects rather of pity than of abhorrence,

would be reconciled to our indulgent feelings, and, at the same time,

made intelligible to our understandings.

The Caesars · 第 3 / 6 章