Chapter XX

Proof at Last

Reeves went to sit in Gordon’s room when he got back; his own was apt

to be a port of call for stray comers, and he wanted this to be a

_tête-à-tête_.

“I wish to God,” he started, “that I’d never been dragged into this

beastly thing at all.”

“Getting a brain-storm over it? Much better take to golf again;

there’s no sense in worrying over a problem that won’t be solved.”

“I have solved it.”

“What!”

“I have solved it, and I wish to God I hadn’t. Look here, Gordon, I

know who it was who came into my rooms and took out my Shakespeare. It

was Marryatt.”

“Yes, but you don’t mean——”

“It was Marryatt who took out my Shakespeare; he wanted to look up a

quotation for his evening sermon. I know what you’ll say—it was

somebody else who took the Momerie. But it wasn’t; I’ve been into

Marryatt’s room, and I found it there.”

“Good Lord! Lying about?”

“It was on his table, but entirely covered with papers—I thought,

purposely. I didn’t like doing it, but I felt the obvious thing was to

look through those papers on Marryatt’s table. Among them was a

postcard from Brotherhood, dated a week ago, thanking him for the gift

of a copy of Momerie’s _Immortality_.”

“But, look here, the thing’s impossible! Marryatt, I mean, Marryatt

isn’t the least the sort of person——”

“Yes, I know all that. I’ve thought of all that. But just look at the

facts. There’s not the least doubt it was Marryatt who came into my

room, yesterday afternoon, I suppose. He came in, no doubt, for the

pipe-cleaner or for the Shakespeare quotation—I don’t grudge him

either. Then he must have seen the Momerie on the shelf, and I suppose

couldn’t help taking it; he didn’t feel safe as long as the thing was

in my hands. He is, of course, just the height Carmichael mentioned;

he does smoke Worker’s Army Cut; his pipes always are foul.”

“Yes, but he may have wanted the Momerie for anything.”

“Why did he never tell me he’d taken it? Look here, you’ve got to face

the facts. Let me marshal them for you; you can imagine I’ve been

thinking them out pretty furiously. First, Marryatt had a reason for

disliking Brotherhood.”

“For disliking him, yes; but not for wanting to murder him.”

“Of course to you and me it wouldn’t seem so; we don’t know the

clerical temper from the inside. After all, Marryatt has a hard time

of it in any case, trying to knock a little piety out of these

villagers. What must he think of the man who comes and tries to take

away what beliefs they’ve got?”

“All right, go on. Of course, it’s quite impossible.”

“Next point: it was Marryatt who gave Brotherhood that Momerie book.

Brotherhood, of course, took it up to London with him in the train on

Monday, but is it likely that anybody would notice it particularly?

The one man who knew for certain that it was in his possession was the

man who had given it to him.”

“But did Marryatt know anything about Brotherhood’s connection with

Miss Rendall-Smith—about his promise to her?”

“We’ll come to that presently. It doesn’t arise yet, if you consider

the actual wording of the cipher-message. What it said was, ‘You will

perish if you go back upon your _faith_’—I now read that as a purely

theological message, and I know of only one man in the neighbourhood

who would have been likely to send such a message.”

“You seem to be pressing words rather far.”

“Next point: Marryatt did travel by the three o’clock train on

Tuesday. He made no secret of the fact; he told us about it—why?

Precisely because he had arranged the murder so as to look as if it

was connected with the 3.47: the three o’clock train was his alibi,

and he was determined to get his alibi well rubbed in. Don’t you

remember, just before we found the body, the discussion we all had in

the smoking-room about crime, and how Marryatt said it was very

important for the criminal to behave naturally in company, so as to

establish his alibi? Well, that’s what he was doing at the moment.”

“I’d forgotten his saying that.”

“It doesn’t do to forget these things. You’ve probably forgotten that

it was Marryatt who started the whole subject, by saying it was the

kind of afternoon when one would want to murder somebody. You see, he

couldn’t get the subject out of his mind, and he thought the easiest

way to get it off his chest was to start talking about murder, quite

naturally, in an abstract sort of way.”

“You’re making him out a pretty cool customer.”

“He was, up to a point. Remember, he started out on a round, knowing

that the body of his victim lay under the railway arch. Only at the

third tee his nerve deserted him, and he pulled his drive.”

“Yes, but hang it all, anybody——”

“I’m only mentioning the fact; I don’t say there was necessarily

anything significant about it. Anyhow, I sliced mine, and so we came

to find Brotherhood’s body. And that was too much for him; you will

remember that at the moment he was quite unnerved. We had to send him

off to fetch Beazly—and he wasn’t half glad to go. After that,

remember, right up to the time of the inquest, he was in a state of

pitiful agitation. He explained that by telling us that he was nervous

about whether he’d be allowed to bury Brotherhood or not; but when you

come to think of it, does that account for the extraordinary

excitement and nervousness he showed about the whole thing? Anyhow,

the jury found suicide—and remember, he always wanted us to believe it

was suicide—and immediately his trouble vanished. He seemed to lose

interest in the business from then on.

“But over one thing he did give himself away. Do you remember, when

Carmichael produced that photo of Miss Rendall-Smith, Marryatt

professed not to know who it was? Now, I fancy there are aspects of

the case here which we haven’t been able to trace yet. But on the face

of it, it was curious that Marryatt, who has lived here for quite a

long time and knows all the clerical society round here, shouldn’t

know the daughter of the man who used to be Rector of Binver. For some

reason, he preferred not to be in the know. He said he’d take it over

to Binver and identify it. He took it over: it was early-closing day,

and Campbell’s studio must really have been shut. But Marryatt comes

back with some lame story about Campbell not being shut after all; and

he tells us, not only whom the photograph represents, but the whole

life-story of the lady into the bargain. I say, he made a mistake

there. We ought to have been suspicious.

“We were not suspicious; he came and played bridge in my room the same

night. It gave him a very nasty turn when, as we all thought, the

photograph altered its appearance. He was completely unstrung; and the

form his nerves took was an intense desire that we should drop the

inquiry altogether. He had begun to grow superstitious, as so many

murderers do. But he made the best use he could of it, by trying to

shut down our investigations on the strength of it. That failed, but

something even better turned up—Davenant’s hiding in the secret

passage. By the way, I’m pretty well convinced, though I can’t prove

it, that it was Marryatt and not Davenant who took away the copy of

that paper, with the cipher on it. Of course, when we found Davenant,

it not only concealed the fact that he had taken away the cipher, but

also turned the suspicion into quite a different channel.

“Here, I must admit, Marryatt shows up badly. He saw an innocent man

accused, and he took no action to exculpate him. On the contrary, he

stated to me quite emphatically his belief in Davenant’s guilt. But we

mustn’t judge him hardly; he may have meant—he may still mean, for all

we know, to come forward if Davenant is found guilty. Meanwhile,

there’s one more piece of evidence which I understand now, though it

has bothered us a good deal. You remember the thing we call the

‘washing-list,’ the words we found on the back of the anonymous

letter?”

“Yes, rather. What about it?”

“Well, it clearly wasn’t part of the cipher, was it?”

“Probably not—one can’t be certain, but it didn’t look like it.”

“Well then, you’ve got to choose, it seems to me, between two

possibilities. One is that this sheet of paper—it’s only a half-sheet

in any case—was blank until the cipher was written on it. Then it

passed into Brotherhood’s possession, and Brotherhood, looking about

for a piece of paper to jot down a list on, found this one and used

it.”

“That’s what I’d assumed.”

“In that case, it’s hard to see any special significance about the

list, isn’t it? It’s not in Brotherhood’s writing, apparently; but of

course if he wrote it in the train, it’s possible that his handwriting

would be untraceable.”

“What’s the other possibility?”

“Why, just the other way round. That the list, whatever its meaning

may be, was written on that piece of paper first. And then the

murderer, wanting to send the cipher message to Brotherhood, took up

that piece of paper at random to write it on, without noticing that

there were already four words pencilled on the back.”

“That’s possible, certainly.”

“Well, don’t you see, in that case the list becomes very important,

because it was written not by Brotherhood but by the murderer, and it

may accidentally give us a clue to the murderer’s character.

“A rather obscure clue. As far as I remember all it said was Socks,

Vest, Hem, Tins.”

“Yes, but look here: do you remember my asking whether those words

were written on the paper, right at the edge of the paper, before or

after the sheet was torn in half? Well, my own belief has always been

that those are only parts of words, and that the other half, possibly

with a lot more writing as well, was lost to us when the sheet was

torn.”

“And you’ve restored the full words?”

“I think I have. I’m just going to write it out for you.” And, after

scribbling for a moment, he put before Gordon two sheets of paper;

one, which was blank, partly covered the other, so as to hide part of

what had been written on it.

“Well, that’s all correct,” said Gordon: “Socks, Vest, Hem, Tins, all

present. Do you want me to guess the other halves of the words—the

first half, I suppose, in each case? Because I give you fair warning

that I have never guessed a riddle in my life.”

Reeves took away the upper sheet of paper, and made Gordon read again.

“Hassocks, Harvest, Anthem, Mattins—well, I’m blowed! You ought to be

given a fountain-pen for this sort of thing.”

“But seriously, isn’t it almost certain that those were the words of

the original, before the sheet was torn in half? What connected them,

of course, we can’t say. But they’re all ecclesiastical words—at

least, you can say that ‘harvest’ is an ecclesiastical word at this

time of the year, with harvest festivals coming on. Could such a sheet

of paper have been lying about and been taken up carelessly anywhere

but in a clergyman’s rooms? And honestly, doesn’t that clinch the case

against Marryatt?”

“Well, it certainly looks as if one would like to ask Marryatt a few

questions. Though, mark you, I refuse to believe that Marryatt laid

hands on Brotherhood.”

“We can’t ask him questions. We must put him to a test.”

“What sort of a test?”

“Well, surely the stick might come in handy there. If we could somehow

confront him with it suddenly, and see how he takes it—I believe they

do that sort of thing in America.”

“Carmichael, I fancy, would tell you that the system was originally

Danish.”

“Why Danish?”

“Really, Reeves, what is the use of all your researches into _Hamlet_,

if you don’t realize that your present idea is just what Hamlet does

to the King and Queen when the Players come on? I think, you know,

it’s rather a dangerous method, because it’s so easy to suggest things

to a person’s mind when they’re not there already. But this I will

say, if Marryatt recoils from the sight of that stick which you picked

up this afternoon, or shows any trace of confusion when he sees it,

then—I won’t say I’ll be prepared to regard Marryatt as guilty, but

I’ll be prepared to ask him for an explanation.”

“Well, Sadducee, have it your own way. We’ll put that stick and the

golf-ball lying out prominently in my room. At dinner we’ll ask

Marryatt to come along afterwards. We’ll go out of dinner early, and

get into the secret passage. From there we can watch and see what

happens when he comes in.”

“Don’t you think it would be a mistake to ask him in? It might somehow

put him on his guard. . . . Yes, I know, I can make sure that he comes

into your room without being asked. Leave that part to me, and stand

by as soon as dinner’s over. We can go up into the passage by the

billiard-room end.”

The viaduct murder · 第 20 / 25 章