WITHOUT VISION

"Where there is no vision, the people perish."--Pro. xxix. 18.

I began this book on Armistice day, and am ending it on Peace day. This

period of about eight months has been a time of great disillusionment.

Even those little inclined to be deceived by the customary exaggerations

of politicians, and little disposed to believe in sudden conversions,

had hoped that the immense effort of this Great War was to awaken the

deadened conscience of the world; to leave a permanent improvement in

social and international relations; making class and individual and sex

competition, as also national rivalry, a less pronounced feature in the

new order; replacing greed by desire for service, war by a League of

Nations to enforce justice. But a war of justice was followed by a peace

of trickery and injustice. The victors (if not every one of them, still

collectively) claimed their spoils as in earlier wars. Clemenceau's

desire for vengeance triumphed over Wilson's principles in the center of

the world stage.

More than ever we search the future with anxiety. Amid the confusions

and compulsions, the changes unavoidable in this time of uncertainty, it

is immensely more difficult to act wisely. In the old days it all seemed

so much easier, as if life could be shuffled, like a pack of cards, into

new arrangements. War has made a difference to the whole of life,

shattered everything, as it were, in our hands, made the daily duties of

most of us much harder. We have been robbed of serenity.

When you stand at the threshold of this new difficult world, knowing, as

I do, that the milestones marking the backward path tell you, with

certainty, that the greater part of your life and your work lies behind

you, then, in these waiting days of urgency, you will want to hold a

reckoning with yourself and with life, in humility to question

everything, your own faith and what you have tried to teach to others

with all the honesty you have.

My task has been a difficult one, and it is made much more difficult by

reason of the uncertainties of our outlook, because there are now so

few principles accepted by all of us as true; every principle is faced

by a counter principle. It is so much easier to have fixed standards of

conduct than to argue every case that occurs. We have failed in every

direction to establish ideals fine enough and complete enough, and

useful enough to hold our imagination and our wills. Everyone seems to

be more or less at loose ends of conflicting purposes. Morals now are

like clothes, made to measure and to fit each wearer. Too often, in

important particulars, they change as easily and foolishly as the

fashions change.

I wish to bring people back to a disciplined freedom; to a recognition

of their own needs and the needs of others--the deepest desires of life.

A morality based on individual values is breaking down in every

direction, under the temptations and unsettlements, increased and

hastened by the war, but brought about primarily by profit seeking, by

the struggle of everyone doing as he likes, by a society so large, so

ill organized and so hurried that personal intercourse gives way to

mechanical relationships.

My position is all the more difficult as, while inclining more to the

spirit of those who, in relation to the moral questions I have dealt

with, are conservative, I yet regard very many of our accepted

conventions and our laws as productive of evil. I realize the way in

which they act so disastrously in hindering the spiritual and physical

health of our society. I am, therefore, eager for certain very

wide-reaching reforms.

I have not great patience with abstract theories of right and wrong,

rather I would test every law and every institution by its usefulness in

helping men and women. However imperfectly I have succeeded, I have set

_this aim of helpfulness_ steadfastly before me in every proposal I have

made for changes in our marriage laws and in the hindering laws which

regulate personal conduct. I do not want to discuss and consider

humanity, life, or anything else as I would like them to be, but, as

honestly as I can, I would observe and then help them as they are.

So many calamities and so much sin that could be prevented are

listlessly accepted by us as inevitable. New ideas and needs are

entangled among old; there is much of the new that is desirable to

preserve, much of the old that needs to be reformed. I would wish to

oppose two tendencies: I would prevent the too ready acceptance of the

fashions of the day, and I would also prevent a too loyal obedience to

the prejudices of yesterday. I would unite the intelligence of the

modern with the passion and sincerity of the ancient.

Such is the immensely difficult task that must be faced by every one of

us to-day. All of us are charged with heavy responsibility. Ours is a

greater inheritance than ever before there has been in the world. We

have all of us become responsible in a new and sterner way; to unite in

our search to find the new right paths. Three generations of

industrialism have created hideous abuses; we have to end them. With our

wider vision and more knowledge, with the lessons we have learned, with

the pain of our suffering, and our sacrifices still branded on our

hearts, we have to unite one with the other and all of us together to

renew and to justify life. We have to remake the world.

Women's Wild Oats: Essays on the Re-fixing of Moral Standards · 第 71 / 87 题