The real Mata Hari was born in the little Dutch town of Leeu

[Illustration: Mata Hari]

MATA HARI

_Courtesan and Spy_

By

MAJOR THOMAS COULSON, O.B.E.

[Illustration: Emblem showing a laurel wreath surrounding a flaming

torch held upright between two outstretched hands, with Greek text

inside the wreath.]

HARPER & BROTHERS PUBLISHERS

_New York and London_

1930

MATA HARI

_Copyright, 1930, by Harper & Brothers_

_Printed in the U. S. A._

SEVENTH PRINTING

EIGHTH PRINTING

G-E

_Illustrations are from the collection of

W. Adolphe Roberts_

_To

MITSOU_

_Preface_

The romantic adventures of Mata Hari stirred a certain section of public

opinion to a sympathy rarely accorded to spies. The men and women of

that profession are usually the object of general execration from their

enemies and a somewhat furtive admiration from others who extract

pleasure or consolation from the pursuit of danger, where the degree and

not the motive is the standard. Why, then, should this vaudeville “star”

have excited a contrary emotion? Why should she have as defenders:

princes, statesmen, savants, and artists, as well as genial

_boulevardiers_ who, if lacking in a supersensitive morality, are

without doubt loyal citizens of the nation to which Mata Hari did

incalculable harm?

In the first place, Mata Hari was a woman of unusual beauty, moving

within a veil of sensual mysticism; in the second place, her chosen

forum was Paris. The attention she had drawn as an artist and her subtle

personality account for much of the interest she aroused. The fact that

a Frenchman is never too fat, too old, or too ugly to be interested in a

pretty (and frail) woman supplies the remainder of the answer to the

problem. The average woman spy, outside of the popular romances, is not

a lovable creature. But, endowed with a romantic nature, a rich

imagination, a flair for the sensational, the sentimental, and the

poetic, preaching a gospel of love which had to be communicated in

whispered confidences, has this woman not all the characteristics of an

ideal heroine for a successful novel?

Since the life and death of Mata Hari have become the common property of

writers for the stage and more particularly for the screen, her

fascinating history as a super-spy, dancer, courtesan, and

high-priestess of a lascivious love cult with its wealth of drama,

romance, and bitter tragedy, has been submerged beneath a torrent of

highly imaginative literature which almost completely obscures the

truth. No spy story is too absurd to be associated with her name; no

deep-rooted intrigue too treacherous but that it becomes the more

sinister by being made to revolve about her person. For the most part

these flights of the artistic imagination bear too unmistakably the

stamp of their manufacture to be worth exposing, but others, more subtly

constructed, have passed into the current coin of espionage legend

without any better claim to authenticity. The life of Mata Hari is

romantic enough to require no embellishment, so that in the following

narrative imagination plays no part in the drama it unfolds. No effort

has been made to invent situations or conversations to promote the easy

flow of the story.

Certain phases of Mata Hari’s life are inexplicable to those

unaccustomed to the methods and practices of the secret services, and

for this reason I have tried to illustrate the story with examples of

other spies’ experiences. This knowledge of the German espionage work

was collected while a regimental intelligence officer in Ireland,

England, and France. The quoted examples of other spies are stories told

me, for the most part, by men who were actually engaged in the work of

counter-espionage which revealed their activities. It has been suggested

that the narrative would be more convincing if the names of certain

actors in the sensational story had appeared in the text. This could

only have been done if the great game had terminated with the other

hostilities on November 11, 1918. Unfortunately, that is not so. The

scenes change, the task varies, but the work goes on. Reticence on

certain points became not merely a matter of discretion, but of life and

death to some of the men still engaged in the work of counter-espionage.

For instance, allusion is made in the text to a Russian courier who

carried a draft treaty in the barrel of his fountain pen. I have been

asked who was the courier and what treaty did he carry. To reveal these

details would most certainly lead to the imprisonment, possibly the

death, of a man who is still actively engaged in this dangerous work. It

might be urged that the mere mention of the extraordinary hiding-place

is evidence enough to betray the main characters. Happily it is not. But

danger lies in the explanation. For purely diplomatic reasons other

details may not yet be revealed, as will be understood from a reading of

the text; too many trusted and influential people are involved. It is a

great gulf that separates the foyers of the elegant Champs-Élysées from

the bivouac fires; the vicious luxury of the _demi-monde_, sipping its

cocktail with nice enjoyment, from the beer-swigging soldiers in the

canteens; the lascivious dances of the worship of Siva from the grim

Dance of Death on the crumbling parapets, where riven bodies were a

commonplace. Yet over this yawning gulf between selfish lust and heroic

self-sacrifice went the fluttering feet of the Red Dancer and her

partner, Death, and the injury she did was tragic enough without adding

to it by exposing people who, through accident or indiscretion, became

involved.

T. C.

_Mata Hari_

COURTESAN AND SPY

_Chapter One_

The first time I heard the name of Mata Hari was in the fall of 1916.

The association of her name with the inexplicable leakage of highly

confidential information will best reveal how the woman’s sinister

activities reacted upon men far removed from her physical existence. It

will help to show why a spy incurs such deadly hatred among men not

disinclined to face death when the danger may be boldly grasped, but who

shudder with apprehension when some nameless and invisible enemy tries

to encompass their destruction under the veil of assumed friendship

which promotes an attitude of indifference among those whose duty it is

to guard against such concealed activity.

Picture, then, a group of English soldiers straining their eyes into the

abyss of night, waiting for the firing of a Verey light which will

illumine a phenomenon just come within their knowledge. A patrol has

just returned with the information that something mysterious has

appeared in No Man’s Land that demands investigation. Scarcity of

numbers in this sector had made increased watchfulness imperative and

there was not a man among them who did not know No Man’s Land as

intimately as he knew the details of his own back yard. But night plays

fantastic tricks with the imagination and the eyes, so that when this

newly returned patrol made its report there was no little uneasiness

about the mysterious object set before their trench. Complete

investigation, however, proved that this was no more than a crude

notice-board bearing the scrawled enquiry, “Why wait for the 29th?”

Thus it came about that the bursting indiscretion of a mischievous Saxon

soldier undid the work of a cunning spy. But we, who were the victims of

the joke, were completely bewildered by this singular message which had

come out of the night. Nor could our staff offer any enlightenment when

we applied to them for an explanation. They were too busy with

statistical computations of the consumption of plum and apple jam to

gratify the misplaced curiosity of an enemy whose sense of humour

usually had a more _macabre_ touch. The incident would have been

overlooked among more pressing anxieties and a tragedy would have

resulted but for a chance visit the following day to some men who were

training in the strictest seclusion for a special minor offensive.

These men were of my own company and at my suggestion were being trained

for a night raid in full daylight. Night training is usually rendered

farcical by the impossibility of adequate supervision, but with darkness

simulated by the use of dark glasses we hoped to achieve a greater

degree of efficiency. The work of these men was conducted in the utmost

secrecy. No one other than about six officers had any idea of either the

purpose, the locale, or the time of the raid. Living in such isolation,

the raiders were always delighted to receive their rare visitors and

listened with delight to the most trifling details of our battalion

activities. As most people whose lives are anything but a joke are

usually entertained by the feeblest jests, I was tempted to tell them of

the enemy’s enigmatic enquiry, “Why wait for the 29th?”

The recital of this incident caused as much consternation as would have

arisen in paradise had the devil dropped in for a social visit. Except,

of course, for the blasphemy; that was supplemental, presumably. It

appeared that the 29th was the date chosen for the secret raid and that

our sector was to be the scene of the outburst. It was then the 26th. In

spite of this unexpected betrayal after such elaborate precautions to

maintain secrecy, the raid was carried out according to program in all

its details except for the date. On the night of the 27th these men

crept quietly out of the trenches, over No Man’s Land, and fell on an

enemy taken completely by surprise. It would have been an unqualified

success but for the unfortunate death of the young officer in command.

On the return from the raid he was shot in the thigh and I was carrying

him back to our trenches, when a bullet whipped through the night,

penetrated his throat, and embedded itself in my shoulder. Just at the

moment this happened he was about to tell me some secret of his last

leave in Paris and his lips had just framed the words, “If we could only

find that damned dancer ...” when they were closed by the great silence

and his eyes turned to that dawn which knows no eventide.

During a convalescence spent in France, I investigated the circumstances

of young Hogg’s last leave and its association with a dancer, never for

one moment imagining that it would lead to a definite result, since

dancers are as numerous as thieves in the City of Light. What I did

discover had no meaning at the time, but its significance was too great

to be forgotten.

In order to obtain the dark glasses which I had recommended for the

training of his men, Hogg and a companion had gone to Paris as being the

only place within reach likely to furnish this extraordinary need. The

pair of youngsters had little or no knowledge of the city and their

ignorance of the language made the simplest purchase as laborious as a

complicated commercial transaction. They, therefore, addressed

themselves to any chance acquaintance for information concerning

spectacle-makers, but, thanks to the direction of their enquiries, their

request was received as something of a pleasantry by everyone whom they

encountered. Their mission was soon being passed from one malicious

little tongue to another along café terraces until their appearance was

hailed with delight in the more popular rendezvous. At last when they

were becoming desperate, and therefore more amusing, one amiable lady

volunteered her assistance. After a brief interview Hogg consented to

accompany her on the quest for dark glasses. There were, I found,

certain hectic celebrations attending the successful execution of the

commission on which neither of the young officers retained clear

recollections—when the stomach is full the head is empty. They returned

to their posts satisfied that the amiable and kind lady would collect

and forward the required glasses as soon as they were ready.

It was possible, at a later date, and with more evidence available, to

ascertain how the terrible Mata Hari did her work. In order to learn

where and when this raid was to take place she had to delay the dispatch

of the dark glasses until after the two young officers had finished

their short leave, and to accept the responsibility of forwarding them

when they were delivered by the optician who had undertaken to secure

them. For this reason she was furnished with the correct address of the

unit to which they were to be sent, and the enemy was thus able to

identify the locale of the raid. The correct date she ascertained by

feigning a great interest in the exploit and a desire to read of its

successful accomplishment in the communiqué issued the following day.

Those of us who were amazed at her ability to obtain such confidential

information ceased to wonder at Mata Hari’s skill in this case when we

became familiar with her major activities exercised against more capable

protagonists than two young subalterns.

The words spoken in the presentiment of death are often prophetic.

Months later, when Mata Hari was under trial for espionage, the writer

heard her spoken of as the “Red Dancer,” and the mystery of “Why wait

for the 29th?” became a fragment of an infinitely greater quest which

led to the revelation of the entire life of the woman who was registered

in the German secret service as H21 and who sent thousands like this

young colleague to their death.

_Chapter Two_

This is the Reverse of the Medal. What of its obverse? The story of the

spy H21 is incomprehensible without a knowledge of the “Red Dancer.”

Unless one understands the extraordinary power of fascination she

exercised it is not possible to believe that she could reduce the Second

Bureau, the nerve centre of the French army, to temporary impotence;

could correspond with her espionage chief on paper that bore the heading

of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs; could have conducted an intimate

intrigue with the head of the War Department; and when an outraged army

finally brought her to trial and condemnation, could yet invoke the aid

of princes, ambassadors, and scholars. It is only by a knowledge of what

she called her artistic life that one can realize the nature and extent

of her fatal sorcery. It explains, too, why a band of enthusiastic

pseudo-intellectuals are still endeavouring to invest her with an

aureole of martyrdom, for she claimed the attributes of a high-priestess

of an ancient but little-known religion, and her adorers are willing to

place her in that office within their own degenerate cult.

Not all her believers are to be classed in this coterie. There still

lingers a select band of irreconcilables who steadfastly maintain that

Mata Hari’s claims to be a _bayadère_ were perfectly genuine. One still

meets in the Parisian haunts of the pseudo-intellectuals an occasional

visitor who whispers that on a recent visit to a remote _schloss_ in a

secluded part of Austria he was privileged to attend a repetition of one

of these religious ceremonies dedicated to the god Siva and presided

over by Mata Hari. His words fall on believing ears and there are

murmurs of regret that France should have been the chosen instrument for

inflicting punishment upon this faithful disciple.

In order to realize how she accomplished these astonishing feats one has

to have a picture of her in one of her favourite séances, not a

vaudeville appearance this time (for her public appearances were only

gestures to the mob of unbelievers), but the type of occasion from which

she extracted most enjoyment and most wealth, and which was the

foundation of her amazing power over men of position and influence. It

is such a scene as might be witnessed in the intimacy of the elegant

palaces of, say, the Prince Drago, the Princess Murat, or the Duchess of

Eckmühl. In the voluptuous abandon of the semi-privacy, before a group

of selected guests, reclining in luxurious ease after copious

sacramental libations and surrounded by her worshippers, Mata Hari

invokes the image of her youth.

“I was born,” she says in a soft, languorous tone which the listeners

immediately associated with the mysterious East, “in the south of India

on the coast of Malabar, in the holy city of Jaffnapatam, the child of a

family within the sacred caste of Brahma. By reason of his piety and

pureness of heart my father was called _Assirvadam_, which means ‘The

Blessing of God.’ My mother was a glorious _bayadère_[1] in the temple

of Kanda Swany. She died when she was fourteen, on the same day I was

born. The priests of the temple, having cremated my mother, adopted me

under the baptismal name of Mata Hari, which means ‘Eye of the Dawn.’

From the time when I took my first uncertain steps I was shut up in the

great subterranean hall of the pagoda of Siva, where I was to be trained

to follow in my mother’s footsteps through the holy rites of the dance.

Of these early years my mind retains only vague recollections of a

monotonous existence in which, during the long morning hours, I was

taught to imitate automatically the movements of the _bayadères_, and in

the afternoons was allowed to walk in the gardens while weaving garlands

of jasmine for decorating the altars. When I reached the threshold of

womanhood my foster-mother saw in me a predestined soul and resolved to

dedicate me to Siva and to reveal to me the mystery of love and faith on

the night of Sakty-pudja, in the coming spring....”

Footnote 1:

The _bayadères_ must not be confused with the _nautch_ dancers. The

former are ministrants in the temples and enjoy the respect of the

worshippers. _Nautch_ dancers, on the other hand, are merely

professional dancers engaged to furnish entertainment.

The soft, caressing voice trails off into silence, and at the

recollection of this blissful moment a tremor of religious ecstasy

passes over the exquisitely moulded, amber-tinted body, daringly

revealed for these nocturnal invocations of her sacred youth. Then

suddenly she awakens from her reverie to ask:

“Have any of you an idea of the Sakty-pudja of the Kanda Swany?”

The hypnotized audience, which on occasion included well-known

Orientalists, are compelled to reply that they possess no intimate

knowledge of this festivity of license and religious revelry, so she

proceeds to enlighten them.

“It was on the purple granite altar of the Kanda Swany that, at the age

of thirteen, I danced for the first time, completely nude.”

Then, in the midst of the superb luxury of her wealthy patron’s home,

inspired by the rich food, by the wines, by the seductive lights, by the

sensuous perfumes (all prearranged) she begins to explain the mysteries

of the Supreme Night on which the holy men of the temple savour in life

the cruel but divine ecstasies of Siva’s paradise, that terrible god

Siva who is the god of all sin, of all misunderstanding, of all cruelty.

This recital is illustrated by poses and gestures more provocative than

plain speech. The earlier stages of this fantastic orgy which she

describes are devoted to meditation in an atmosphere of subtle drugs and

Oriental languors. As the awaited moment approaches, when the wise men

will announce the appearance in the heavens of the sign of the Three

Goddesses, the melodious notes of a concealed orchestra begin to breathe

haunting, dreamy harmonies. From the dark recesses of the waving jungle

a soft voice warns of the awakening of the sacred serpents, who, tempted

by the seductive murmur of the instruments, writhe their long slow

length to the temple where Siva awaits their homage. And there they

dance! Among them whirl the curving, undulating bodies of the dainty

little _bayadères_, as clammily chill and as naked as the serpents. The

remainder of this festivity is indescribable; it eclipses the

bacchanalian fêtes of decadent Rome.

This is the beginning of the legend which has grown up about the modern

high-priestess of the dance as a religious rite. In conversation with

her many admirers she outlines her life as she would have wished it to

be. Having no hand in its origin, the next best thing is to prepare the

origin which is best adapted to the rôle she has assumed. The rest

followed naturally in a romantic sequence which satisfied her love of

the dramatic. Mata Hari told how she followed her profession in the

temple until one day a handsome English officer saw her performance and,

struck by the sadness of her eyes, ventured to violate the sacred rules

of her caste by speaking to her. In accordance with the requirements of

romance, they fell in love with each other and the adventurous officer

by a display of cunning, courage, and resource rescued the little Mata

Hari from the prospect of a life devoted to the adoration of the god

Siva, and married her. Shortly after their marriage a son, Norman, was

born, and by her own account the young mother’s cup of happiness was

filled to the brim with this new rapture. However, she said, the child

did not live long, for a typically Oriental act of poisoning resulted in

his death. During a visit to America Mata Hari described in some detail

how this tragedy so infuriated her that the savage within her nature

rose in revolt, so that with her own hands she strangled the unfaithful

servant who had given the child the poisoned cup.

Thus her own account gives to her life a current of vibrant, barbaric

adventure, heavily coloured by the mystery and romance of the unknown

East, which was rendered all the more plausible by nature’s gifts. For

this Dutch girl, born in Holland of homely parents, was endowed with a

strangely Oriental cast of countenance and an amber-tinted body which

she inherited, not from her Hindu parents, but from Jewish progenitors.

_Chapter Three_

“On the purple granite altar of the Kanda Swany, at the age of thirteen

I was initiated.... When I danced before the rajahs on the banks of the

sacred Ganges....”

These and similar phrases were continually on the lips of Mata Hari as

she sought to bind her audiences, or even individuals, for anything with

ears to hear was sufficient audience for her, by the fascination of her

intimate and secret knowledge of art, beauty, and love. However, there

are two counterweights to her highly imaginative narrative which enable

us to obtain a much truer picture of her earlier life and actions. One

is her own _Life_ and the other the brief, frigidly cold, official

biography collected by the French police. With the aid of these and the

accounts of friends and witnesses it is possible to construct a fairly

comprehensive story of her life, the life of Mata Hari, Red Dancer and

H21 of the German secret service.

The _Life_ is a well-printed volume which enjoys the scarcity of some

rare incunabula. It was published in 1906 and the title page reads, in

translation: “Mata Hari: Mrs. M. G. Zelle MacLeod. History of my

daughter’s life and my charges against her former husband, with

portraits, documents, facsimiles, and supplements, by A. Zelle, czm—C.

L. G. Velat, Amsterdam.” But in spite of the clear attribution of

authorship to the mother, a naïve prefatory note declares that “the

earlier chapters of this book have been entirely written by my daughter.

As for the later ones, since she lacked the time to finish them herself,

they were sent to me from America for completion.” The story is too

obviously directed against the errant husband to carry much weight as a

serious autobiography, and it has only been used by the present writer

to corroborate other testimony or to illustrate her thoughts. While we

must follow the creation of the legend of Mata Hari, the time has come

when she should be stripped of all her improvised art and her specially

invented sacred origins and to judge her as a woman. If she is guilty of

the crimes attributed to her, if her deeds brought death and maiming to

men, tears and mourning to their innocent relatives, then no artistry,

no amorous frailty, no pseudo-sacred origin, no peculiar mental

viewpoint can condone or mitigate her sin.

The real Mata Hari was born in the little Dutch town of Leeuwarden on

August 7, 1876, and was given the baptismal names of Margaret Gertrude.

Her nearest approach to Oriental ancestry was a strain of Jewish blood

through her father’s descent. Adam Zelle was a prosperous business man,

but the mother, a good-looking woman of the typical Dutch type, came

from the better-class family of Van der Meulen. Margaret’s early life

seems to have been no more distinguished by incident than that of the

blond children who accompanied her to the Cammingha-State school, and

who scampered through a happy innocent childhood on the banks of a grey

canal. The girl whose dusky beauty was to enslave so many men in high

places can recall no incident of these commonplace days other than a

preference for one golden-haired little playmate. Doubtless it was the

good Vrouw Zelle’s intention to have her daughter educated in a superior

manner, more in keeping with the Van der Meulen pretensions, which urged

her to send Margaret to a school where the girl would be taught to

conduct herself becomingly. She was admitted to a Catholic convent at

the age of fourteen, precisely the time when, from her own romantic

tale, she was being rescued from the Kanda Swany. Thus, instead of being

torn from the grasp of fanatical devotees of an unknown mystic cult, she

was, in reality, entering the cloistered security of a religious house

where young ladies are protected with zealous care.

There she remained until she had reached the age of eighteen and went to

spend a vacation at The Hague, the Dutch capital. In this town, where

life flows with the turgid tranquillity of its own canal waters, the

romantic girl was noticed by a handsome officer whose elegance was

turning the heads of the simple Dutch maidens home from school. Captain

Campbell MacLeod was no longer a young man, but, said Margaret Gertrude,

enthusiastically, “His age renders him still more adorable.” Margaret

admitted later that she had always suffered from a weakness for

officers.

“Anyone who is not an officer,” she said to a group of these men, “does

not interest me. The officer is a being apart, a kind of artist

breathing the grand air in the brilliant profession of arms, in a

uniform that is always seductive. Yes, I have had a number of lovers,

but they were always good soldiers, brave, ready for battle, and while

waiting for it amiable and courteous. To me the officer is a separate

race. I have loved only the officer and have never been concerned to

know whether the man was German, Italian, or French.”

This quaint conceit might have been adopted to flatter the men to whom

it was addressed, but its spontaneity would have been sufficient proof

of its sincerity if her life had not substantiated her words. What gives

this statement a curious tinge of cynicism was the fact that the man who

married her in no way fits the standard she had adopted for her officer.

MacLeod was of good, even distinguished, Scottish descent and held a

commission in the Dutch Colonial Army. At twenty-one he was a vicious

young satyr; at forty he was a satiated libertine who continued to flout

all decency from acquired habit rather than from active desire. A

handsome man of dandified appearance who caressed a tender growth of

down on his lip with jewelled fingers, while he cast stealthy glances of

admiration upon the shapely young convent-bred girl enjoying her holiday

in a town that is not remarkable for its festal life. The inappeasable

sex-hunger of the unhappy man could be read in his eyes, and it was this

which called to the sensuous Margaret.

They were married and spent a joyous honeymoon among the sedate villas

of Wiesbaden, where those drinking the vile waters (or pretending to)

could, on occasion, inject no little gaiety into their cure. Walking in

the pleasant and orderly public gardens or taking her aperitive at the

Kurhaus she must have seen the resplendent type of creature whom she

idealized as the officer, the aloof, dignified, and powerful officers of

the garrison, so great a contrast to the man whom she had married. Who

knows what promising glances she gave the uniformed gods beneath the

sportive baskets of rosebuds which decorate the Hotel Rosenblume?

After an unsuccessful attempt at conjugal felicity in the house of

MacLeod’s sister, where Margaret proved once again that if man is not

made to live alone, women are not intended to live together, the newly

married couple took a house in the more modern part of Amsterdam. Here

their ill-fated son, Norman, was born shortly after their marriage. One

of the events which left an ineffaceable impression on the luxury-loving

bride dates from this same year. MacLeod had the privilege, as an army

officer, of presenting his wife at court. Possibly it was on this

occasion when she made her first bow before royalty that she conceived

the idea of having kings and princes pay her homage.

Indeed, she now begins to cultivate a new pride. It appears that her

husband was not as wealthy as he was supposed to be and his extravagant

habits led to trouble. Margaret felt that she was being neglected, and

in her loneliness found she was no more than a housekeeper for her gay

husband.

“My grandmother was the Baroness Winjbergen,” she reminds MacLeod when

she revolts against this treatment.

But worse is to come. The accomplished libertine whose name she bore

would not break off his acquired habits; he rarely was to be found at

home. He preferred the companionship of fair but frail ladies, of good

fellows with whom he could gamble with all he possessed and a little

more. In a short time he had reached a stage of threatened ruin from

which nothing but an act of repulsive dishonour saved him. The young

wife was instructed to employ her coy glances, her strange Oriental

beauty, and her nascent powers of fascination upon a certain wealthy man

whose indiscretions made him a suitable object for blackmail. Margaret

was not averse to making the attempt.

“But this man was a great admirer of my eyes,” she explains in recording

this interview in her _Life_, “and I was able to collect several

thousands of guilders without having to be unfaithful.”

The final qualification, if true, would not have been added, even as an

afterthought, a short while later.

After this incident there is a gap in Margaret’s life, until we find her

husband commanding a battalion of the Colonial Army Reserve in Java,

where he is living with his wife and two children. The second child, a

daughter called Jeanne Louise, had been born a short while before they

left Holland. But, by the time their track has been picked up in this

jungle clearing, their domestic relations are the scandal of the Dutch

colony.

“It was at Benjoe-Biroe that I got my first whipping,” Margaret says,

reminiscently.

Shortly after this Margaret began to bombard her father for assistance

to secure a legal separation, and the prosperous burgher laid a formal

complaint against the husband with the local authorities. At the same

time he admonished his daughter to control herself with patience and to

have a witness at the next whipping, as this would facilitate a divorce.

In this humid atmosphere the flowers of evil germinate quickly and burst

into abundant blossoms. Before long the half-demented officer was

threatening his wife with a loaded revolver.

“He was in love with another woman,” Margaret writes, “and was willing

to pay the price of murder for his liberty. He admitted it and warned me

that unless we were divorced very quickly he would kill me.”

This consummation of folly was rendered unnecessary by the termination

of MacLeod’s active service. When he was transferred to the reserve of

officers the ill-assorted pair returned to Amsterdam and a petition for

divorce was promptly instituted. But as if to show her desire for

originality the petitioner continued to live with her husband in his

sister’s home until his incessant drunken revelry led the good lady, or

her respectable lawyer husband, to eject them. The MacLeod _ménage_ then

sought a refuge in a modest dwelling which was not at all in keeping

with Margaret’s high ambitions. From here the husband went out one night

on the familiar pretext of mailing a letter and took their sick child

with him so that she might benefit from the air. He did not return. Or,

rather, he only returned when Margaret had recovered the custody of the

little Jeanne through the aid of the courts, pending a decision of her

petition for divorce. When MacLeod did return to the Van Breestrat home

he promptly installed a new mistress. He then proceeded to settle

accounts with Margaret in a manner characteristic of a man who fails to

give his wife any financial assistance. He caused a notice to be

inserted in the newspapers that he would no longer be responsible for

his wife’s debts.

This pious act of repudiation roused Margaret to a pitch of fury, for

she declared that it was instrumental in closing the doors of all her

friends, even that of her noble and virtuous aunt, Baroness Landes,

where she had found a temporary refuge. But Dutch doors are not so

puritanical that they close automatically upon those whose sole error is

to have contemplated divorce from a savage, drunken husband. Dutch

hospitality has a warmer reputation. Be that as it may, Margaret MacLeod

found herself on the street with a sick child, without clothes, and for

riches the sum of three and a half florins.

At this point we leave the old Margaret. Her apprenticeship among the

cherubim of hell now begins. The Red Dancer begins to take form among

the mists that blow in from the North Sea. It may be added, in passing,

that the Dutch courts, having refused her the divorce for which she

applied, granted it shortly after to her husband, to the profound

indignation of her posthumous admirers.

_Chapter Four_

The Paris début of Mata Hari had a ludicrous termination. Light upon

this stage of her life has been wanting, so that these few scant details

will be interesting since they are new. Finding all havens closed to her

in Amsterdam, Margaret decided to admit failure and returned to the

parental home in The Hague. But the prosperous and highly respected

burgher-father killed no fatted calf for the wanderer. Instead, he was

ready enough to provide the means of removing his daughter from the

neighbourhood. Furnished with the necessary funds, Margaret made for

Paris, determined to make her début as a dancer. But since she had no

professional training and had to find a means of livelihood until her

act was ready, she did what so many other young stage people do—she

posed as a model for painters.

“On the purple granite altar of the Kanda Swany....”

But between the coasts of Malabar and La Rotonde many waters flow.

Margaret was twenty-seven when she knocked one morning at a studio door

in the Montparnasse district.

“I am seeking employment as a model,” she explained to the artist.

“Very good,” he replied. “Let me see your figure.”

“Oh no! I want to pose only for the head,” was her horrified response.

“I am the widow of a colonel who died in the Indies and left me with two

sons. I am trying to educate them but have no resources.”

“In that case your beauty ought to secure you some sittings for the

head, but you will be paid much less than if you will pose for the full

figure, for, from what I can gather, you must have a pretty figure. At

any rate, I don’t insist.”

Margaret lamented the immolation of her modesty, the outrage to her

distinguished family, and, generally, made use of the familiar

arguments, but when the painter told her abruptly that she could do just

whatever she pleased she began to undress.

To this man and to other artists we owe the explosion of another portion

of the bubble of her legendary life. Artists who saw her have all borne

testimony to the beauty of Mata Hari’s figure, several declaring that

they had never seen such lovely shaped arms. But for the employment as a

model she had one grave defect—her bust was pendulous and ugly. During

her dances she never bared her breasts, although this was the only part

of her body which was covered. Invariably she wore a jewelled covering

for her bosom. The Red Dancer had her own explanation to offer for this

and it reflected more to the type of credit she coveted.

“My husband,” she used to say, “often threatened to disfigure me so that

no other man would desire me.”

She claimed that in one of his fits of erotic dementia the man had

attacked her in such a ferocious fashion that she was mutilated. “That

is why,” she would conclude the story, “I have not cared to exhibit my

complete torso.”

However, to return to her application for employment. The disappointment

of the artist that such a promising model was not satisfactory for his

purpose caused him to remark that, after all, she had better pose for

the head alone. Either she felt her modesty was outraged by this, or,

what is more likely, her vanity was shocked, but the innocent statement

produced what the French call a _crise de nerfs_, in which the artist

had to call for his wife’s assistance and, to soothe Margaret’s injured

modesty (or vanity), the painter did make use of her in a poster which

occupied him at the time. She was in the grimly appropriate character of

Messalina! Thus the poster of the Gaîté’s production of Isador de Lara’s

“Messalina” was posed by Mata Hari, and no one has yet commented on the

grim symbolism of the combination.

In 1903 she made her début as a dancer, less than a year after the

inhospitable doors of her virtuous relations had closed upon her. What

success she had or might have reaped from this initial appearance is

only a matter of speculation, because the outraged Scottish husband

clamoured for protection against anyone bearing the honoured name of his

puritanical ancestors consecrating herself to the art of the dance in

the modern Babylon. In the first flush of his outraged pride he wrote an

indignant letter to his wife, threatening to have her enclosed in a

convent if she did not conduct herself with more modesty and dignity.

This unexpected document afflicted Margaret with a mingling of tears,

fear, and revolt. She demanded telegraphic counsel of her relatives, and

as a result of their replies she voluntarily returned to Holland and

went into seclusion amid the austere rusticity of Nimegue, in order to

escape the mediæval vengeance of her irate husband. To the enthusiastic

admirers of Mata Hari this period of her life has been likened to the

Agony in the Garden. The crazy, muddled drug addicts whose celestial

system centres round the more obscure night haunts of Paris and extends

only to the other bank of the Seine, picture life in this little Dutch

town as refined torture for the soul that sought the unbounded liberty

of the stars, the unmeasured spaces of love, and the unplumbed depths of

Siva’s paradise. But they are a little in advance of time. The

constellation of the Three Goddesses was not yet reported to have

appeared in the firmament. None the less, Margaret hated the place.

“Am I to remain here for the rest of my days?” she wails in January of

1904. Truly one who has known the joys of Parisian life will understand

that the innocent festivities of Nimegue are a poor substitute. It was

doubtless the repression of this period which caused her to fly to the

other extreme when she escaped. In place of the glaring footlights which

she coveted was the pale reflection of the sun in the copper dishes on

the walls; the only audience were the curious housewives who peered from

behind discreetly drawn curtains as the woman of the dance-halls flitted

down the silent street; and for music, the joyous music her heart loved,

there was only the metallic clank of the municipal belfry when the

bell-ringers practised their ingenuous hobby. The grey little town which

dwells in the almost perpetual shadow of sea mists must have seemed as

remote from the delights of the City of Light as was Benjoe-Biroe in the

Javanese jungle.

“I shall triumph sooner or later,” she cries defiantly from the

enveloping fog.

And then one day she summons her courage and descends upon the gay Paris

like a thunderclap. Margaret Gertrude Zelle is no more, the curtain

rises definitely on the Red Dancer.

_Chapter Five_

Mata Hari established her reputation in Paris; she achieved the highest

flights of her fame in that city, and her other conquests, in Berlin,

Rome, Vienna, London, were but reflections of her Parisian success. Her

first efforts were in public, on the vaudeville stage, where she

speedily gained a sympathetic reception by the novelty of her dancing.

But it was not as a dancer that she coveted a reputation. Of one thing

about her dancing we may be certain: as an art such as Isadora Duncan

conceived it or as Loie Fuller imagined it, Mata Hari had no conception.

Dancing to her was nothing more than a means of attracting attention, of

displaying the splendour of her beauty, with the ultimate object of

captivating her lovers. Like many another artist who has imagined

herself greater than her art, Mata loved the adulation offered to a

popular favourite, but better than a large audience in a theatre she

loved the intimacy afforded by private engagements in some luxurious

apartment where, before a select audience of refined profligates, and

brilliant, wealthy, dilettantes she could explain with greater freedom

the sensuous rites of the fantastic cult to which she had promoted

herself the high-priestess.

Her ideal was to become a famous—the most famous—courtesan, and to

achieve it she invented her sacred origin and improvised an art. The

opportunity she sought was to exhibit her lovely amber body among gold

and precious stones, to pose rhythmically among sumptuous

transparencies. The rest was only decoration to conceal, justify, and

stimulate the underlying sensual debauch.

“When in my infancy I danced before rajahs on the shores of the sacred

Ganges....”

In point of fact, Mata Hari’s knowledge of the orgies practised in

Brahmanist temples and sanctuaries was derived exclusively from books.

The most she had ever seen were the dances of the tiny Javanese _bayas_

in those villages she had visited while her husband was with the Dutch

colonial forces. Between these diminutive little creatures (more like

automatic toys than flesh and blood) and the _apsaras_ of the Brahman

temples there is a huge gulf. One is the incarnation of some abstract

ancestral rite grown ghostly by its tenuous prolongation through the

ages; the other is the realization of a morbid drug-distorted vision of

bestiality, thinly veiled behind a religious significance.

There may have been moments when she took her charlatanry seriously, but

that Mata Hari’s dances had any religious meaning is the fantasy of

minds not less distorted than her own. As the shadows closed around her

in the prison of Saint-Lazare she gratefully accepted the ministrations

of two Catholic nuns, and on the morning of her execution actually

received the rite of baptism from the hands of an Anabaptist pastor. Two

days after her sentence she begged the prison doctor to obtain for her

some books to beguile the weary hours. Doubtful about her tastes, the

doctor begged for some guidance in the selection, suggesting the works

of such popular writers as Marcel Prévost, Bourget, and Rosny. She

rejected these suggestions with scorn.

“Stories about the middle classes never interested me,” she declared.

“To you I can confess that I have never been able to read through one of

those works which are called comedies of manners. What I do like is

poetry which has mystery, religion, legend, and magic. I firmly believe

that the only means of living in beauty consists in avoiding the

thousand and one daily annoyances which interfere with an existence in

the full ideal. That is why I cannot tolerate European things, not even

the religion.” At which declaration she shook an admonitory finger at

the doctor and continued, “Now do not go and tell that to the poor

religious who are trying so hard to convert me. Those unhappy people do

not understand what the word religion means on my lips and they would

certainly cross themselves piously if they knew that I mingled dances

and caresses in my liturgy.... For I am a Hindu, although born in

Holland. Hindu? Yes, certainly. You who are an intelligent man will say

that there must be something European in me. No, there is not. I am

absolutely Oriental.

“Further, the Orient alone interests me deeply. When one speaks of

motherlands my soul turns to a distant country where a golden pagoda is

mirrored in a winding stream. I do not know exactly what I am or where I

am from. From Benares, from Golconda, from Gwalior, from Madura, what

does it matter? There is a secret in my origin, in my blood. It will be

known sometime later, but, for my own part, I have barely penetrated the

fringe of the secret.”

The doctor said that at this point of the invocation of her illusory

cradle a look of great sadness came over her eyes. This man, who knew

little of her imaginary birth and life, declares that he was baffled by

the complexity of her nature. He maintains that she possessed nothing of

the nature, type, character, culture, mind, or appearance of the women

of Europe; there was something of the primitive savage and at the same

time something sacerdotal and refined about her. Concerning the fuller

development of her studies she continued:

“Formerly, my favourite reading was that which informed me how to love

life and savour voluptuous delights with a passionate, Sybaritical

enjoyment. In the _Prem Sagar_ there are chapters which make the senses

reel as though one was intoxicated with sensuous drugs. And the works of

Kalidasa and his disciples, with their tenderness and picturesque

subtlety, have furnished me with entire days of ecstasy. I smile when I

hear people say that scenic art reaches its apogee in Paris. Yonder, in

India, each passion has its perfume and colour. Thus, love is blue,

pleasure white, tenderness rose, and heroism red. As a new sentiment is

about to dominate a drama the decoration changes tints and the

atmosphere changes its aroma.... The lovers really love, actually engage

in the love embrace on the stage in full view of the audience. They hate

just as truly. The pursuit and attack is real. I have seen blood on the

hands of some of the actors. Ah, those legends of chivalry! those

stories of Rajput warriors who, with a saffron tunic over their coat of

mail, went forth seeking marvellous adventures.... And the romances of

proud Brahmanist daughters enamoured of their pages, imprisoned in a

citadel for years because of their love, without renouncing the hope of

escape which would enable them to flee some day and join the faithful

lovers who awaited them at the door of the pagoda.

“Nothing is more poetic, nobler, or greater than what remains to us of

ancient India.”

Instead of the _Imitation of Christ_, which appears to be the favoured

study of condemned prisoners, Mata Hari chose the _Lotus of Faith_, a

Buddhist book of instruction which teaches a contempt for everything in

life. Even under the shadow of the broad wings of hovering death this

extraordinary woman could command her imagination to furnish the

ecstasies she had formerly been able to realize through the flesh. It is

needless to say that in these confidences her recollections were mere

flights of fancy and not efforts of memory. That artistic touch of the

actors with blood-reeking hands was sheer imagination—the poetic licence

of the story-teller, like so much else in her autobiography. For Mata

Hari’s heart found sustenance in two things—imagination and love of the

carnal kind.

So much, then, for her religion—it was art and love. Yet, to those who

suffered from her deception, she insisted upon the religious

significance of her art. To one admirer she wrote: “As you know, every

true temple dance (not those of the street and the public places) is a

theological treatise and should explain in pose and gesture the rules of

the Vedas, the sacred books.”

Mata Hari · 第 1 / 16 段